Transcript
Page 1: Why a Chernobyl-type accident cannot happen in CANDU reactors a Chernobyl-type accident... · Why a Chernobyl-type accident cannot happen in CANDU reactors Atomic Energy of Canada

Why a Chernobyl-type accident cannothappen in CANDU reactors

-

sest in

-

ct

The Moscow Summit on Nuclear Safety. Canada has been engaged with other countries in assisting Russia in the upgrading ofsome of its reactors. Canadians are also working on safety improvements at Chernobyl and on long-term preparations for closingthe plant.

Atomic Energy of Canada Limited’s (AECL)approach to safety, the special safety system

all AECL-built CANDU® reactors, and the nature othe Canadian nuclear energy industry and programeliminate the possibility of a Chernobyl-type accideat a CANDU station.

Canada and AECL have played a leading role in analyzing the circumstances surrounding theChernobyl accident, which took place in the formeSoviet Union (FSU) in 1986. The Canadian work indiscoveringthe most likely root cause of the accidehas been accepted by most of the Western world acknowledged by the FSU.

In addition, AECL and Canada continue to activelyparticipate in and lead subsequent work related tooperating conditions and the safety culture at nuclpower plants, especially in the FSU. AECL recentlled a project with several interntional participants tproduce a completely new Safety Report for theIgnalina RBMK plant in Lithuania. This project has

s off

nt

r

ntand

earyo

received high praise from the international reviewteam commissioned by the EBRD.

AECL’s Safety ApproachAECL’s defence-in-depth approach to safety is fundamental to the design, construction, and stationoperation of CANDU reactors. This approach limitthe chance of any accident occurring, and minimizthe possible effects on people and the environmenthe unlikely event that an accident did occur.

There are four key elements of AECL’s defence-indepth approach:

Prevention: Fundamental to the CANDU approachto safety is good design and the application of striquality control to the design, manufacturing and construction of each plant, and during operation and maintenance for its full economic life. Duringoperation, key components are regularly inspectedto prevent accidents. Click here to go to next page

Page 2: Why a Chernobyl-type accident cannot happen in CANDU reactors a Chernobyl-type accident... · Why a Chernobyl-type accident cannot happen in CANDU reactors Atomic Energy of Canada

a-.

e,ons

ly has

A flow visualization test is condutests ensure a clear understandicriteria is the first priority of all

Protection: Accidents can be stopped by control annormal process systems. The reactor can be shutdown by independent and automatic safety system

Mitigation: The reactor core can be refilled throughthe Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) andalternate safety-grade heat sinks are supplied.

Accommodation:The containment building pre-vents the release of radioactivity to the environmen

Special CANDU Systems

In CANDU reactors, the normal computerized systems that control the plant are powerful enoughimmediately and safely shut down the reactor in thevent of most equipment failures or abnormal reacconditions. Special safety systems incorporated inthe plant mitigate any failure caused by equipmenor by human error. These safety systems perform active function in the normal operation of the plantand the reactor can not operate without all beingavailable.

There are four special safety systems in a CANDUplant: two independent, fully-capable and passiveshutdown systems; the emergency core cooling system, and the containment system. The shut-down safety systems are designed to be “fail-safe”This means that if a component of the shutdown system fails, the rest of the system is automaticallyactivated to shut down the reactor.

cted at AECL’s Sheridan Park Engineering Laboratory. Suchng of fuel behaviour in the reactor. Meeting stringent safety AECL systems.

d

s.

t.

toetortot no

.

Shutdown System No. 1 (SDS1):Solid mechanicalshutdown rods drop in from the top of the reactor core and stop the chain reaction by absorbing theneutrons.

Shutdown System No. 2 (SDS2):A concentratedsolution of neutron-absorbing liquid is injectedthrough pipes directly into the low-pressure moderator, also to stop the chain reaction.

Either shutdown system reduces the heat being generated from 100 per cent to 10 per cent in justtwo seconds. Residual heat can be taken away byeither normal or emergency heat removal systems.

Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS):Theemergency core cooling system is designed to re-establish fuel cooling in the unlikely event of aloss-of-coolant accident. The ECCS serves only asbackup cooling supply, as the normal coolant makeup system prevents net loss of fluid from the circuit

The ECCS incorporates three stages: injection stagintermediate stage, and recovery stage. The injectistage uses pressurized air to inject water from tanklocated outside the reactor building into the heattransport system. The intermediate stage supplieswater from the dousing tank. When this water suppis depleted, the recovery stage recovers water thatbeen collected in the reactor building sump andpumps it back into the heat transport system.

Containment:There are normally five barriers thatprevent release of radioactive materials from theplant:

Solid uranium dioxide fuel contains more than 90 per cent of radioactive fission products.

The uranium dioxide is sealed in a metal tube or sheath.

The fuel is inside a sealed heat transport cooling system.

A massive containment building surrounds the cooling system.

There is an exclusion zone between the CANDUplant and residential areas. This dilutes anyradioactive release to the public in the unlikelyevent of an accident.

Click here to go to next page

Page 3: Why a Chernobyl-type accident cannot happen in CANDU reactors a Chernobyl-type accident... · Why a Chernobyl-type accident cannot happen in CANDU reactors Atomic Energy of Canada

pool

Comparison of Safety Systems: CANDU and a Chernobyl Type RBMK Reactor in 1986

Feature CANDU RBMKContainment 1. Full containment 1. Partial containment

2. Concrete building, or multi-unit 2. No upper containment:negative pressure containment, lower containment is concrete surrounding all major piping, with cells surrounding high-pressurewater spray (dousing) to reduce piping and connected to a waterthe building pressure. to reduce the building pressure.

Shutdown Systems 1. Two complete systems: 1. One mechanism:– absorber rods – absorber rods– liquid injection

2. Two seconds to be effective 2. Ten seconds to be effective

3. Effective, independent of 3. Effectiveness depends onstate of plant state of plant

Moderator 1. Cool heavy water 1. Hot solid graphite

i-

se

uc-d

CANDU and RBMK Comparison

CANDU reactors are designed more effectively forsafe operation than RBMKs such as the Chernobystation. CANDU’s advantages include better contament and two emergency shutdown systems, whicoperate independently and shut down the reactormuch faster.

lin-h

Cooperating with Russia

AECL and Ontario Hydro, Canada’s largest electricty utility, cooperated with Russia in safety analysesand in identifying enhanced safety measures forRBMK reactors.

As well, Canada’s Atomic Energy Control Board(AECB) has developed a program to assist thenuclear licensing authorities in Lithuania, Russia and Ukraine. The program provides the staff of theauthorities with the opportunity to review legislationand regulations governing the nuclear industry inCanada. Staff have also received training and instrtion in the AECB’s practices and in procedures useto assess and control acceptable safety levels.

A Chinese delegation visits the control room at the Gentilly 2CANDU 6 station in Canada. The CANDU design features fourspecial safety systems. Click here to go to next page

Page 4: Why a Chernobyl-type accident cannot happen in CANDU reactors a Chernobyl-type accident... · Why a Chernobyl-type accident cannot happen in CANDU reactors Atomic Energy of Canada

fp-d

er-

1996 November960580C R1

CANDU® (CANadaDeuterium Uranium) is a registered trademark of Atomic Energy of CanadaLimited (AECL).

Moscow Summit

The Summit on Nuclear Safety and Security tookplace in Moscow in April 1996. The purpose was tohighlight the highest priority given to the safe use onuclear energy and to strengthen international cooeration in safety and security issues. Canada playea key role at the Summit by continuing its efforts toensure the implementation of a Memorandum ofUnderstanding (MOU) that sets out the principlesand elements of a comprehensive program of coopation for the closing of Chernobyl. Canada is alsoworking on short-term safety improvements atChernobyl, on preparations for closing the plant,and on the longer-term environmental cleanup of the Chernobyl site.

For more information, please contact:

Marketing and SalesAECL2251 Speakman DriveMississauga Ontario Canada L5K 1B2

Tel.: (905) 823-9040Fax: (905) [email protected]

Click here to go to first page


Top Related