Transcript
Page 1: Thermophilic and mesophilic methane production from anaerobic degradation of the cyanobacterium Spirulina maxima

Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 1 (1988) 19-26 19 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V./Pergamon Press plc - - Printed in The Netherlands

Thermophilic and Mesophilic Methane Production from Anaerobic Degradation of the Cyanobacterium Spirulina Maxima*

V.H. VAREL, T.H CHEN and A.G. HASHIMOTO

Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Clay Center, NE 68933 (U.S.A.)

(Received June 4, 1987; accepted in revised form September 9, 1987)

ABSTRACT

Methane production from fermentation of the cyanobacterium, Spirulina maxima, as the sole substrate was investigated in 200 mL working-volume anaerobic digesters maintained at 35 and 55°C. Digesters were fed once-per-day with a feed concentration (Sto) of 22.5 g volatile solids (VS) per liter, at retention times (0) of 8, 12, and 16 days. Digester contents were mixed for one min before and after feeding. After 3 volume turnovers, effluent samples were obtained on four consecutive days. Methane production rate (L CH4/L-day ) and methane yield (B) ( L/g of COD fed) at 35°C were 0.47 and 0.09, 0.41 and 0.15, and 0.31 and 0.15 at the respective 0 of 8, 12, and 16 days; at 55°C they were 0.20 and 0.05, 0.31 and 0.11, and 0.19 and 0.09, respectively. The ultimate methane yield (Bo) after 105 days of batch fermentation was 0.22 L CH4 per g COD fed (0.33 L CH4/g VS fed). COD degradation at these retention times and temperatures was between 23 and 40%, ammonia nitrogen between 1.12 and 1.86 g/L, and alkalinity between 7.0 and 7.8 g CaCOJL. The concentration of total volatile acids at 35°C was 4.07, 2.58 and 3.13 at 0 =8, 12, and 16 days, respectively; at 55 °C they were 6.78, 4.18, and 4.07, respectively. These results indi- cate that the biomass of S. maxima can be used as a sole nutrient for methane production at mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures. However, the methane production rates at these re- tention times are higher at the mesophilic temperature. These rates are significantly lower than those obtainable with cattle or swine wastes because greater maximum loading rates can be ob- tained with these wastes before digester failure occurs.

INTRODUCTION

Spirulina maxima is a rapidly growing microscopic cyanobacterium (blue-green alga) that is easily separated from its growth medium by simple filtration, is highly digestible as a food source, and contains up to 70% protein of excellent quality [ 1,2 ]. It grows in a high alkaline medium, pH 9-10, which eliminates many potential contaminating microorganisms. Many studies sug-

*Mention of commercial or proprietary products in this report does not constitute a recommen- dation or an endorsement of these products by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Page 2: Thermophilic and mesophilic methane production from anaerobic degradation of the cyanobacterium Spirulina maxima

20

TABLE 1

Composition of medium for growth of S p i r u l i n a m a x i m a a

Component (g/L)

NaHCO~ 16.8 K2HP04 0.5 NAN03 2.5 K~S04 1.0 NaC1 1.0 MgS04" 7H20 0.2 CaC12.2H20 0.04 FeSO4.7H20 0.01 EDTA 0.08 Solution A (mL/L) b 1.00 Solution B (mL/L) c 1.00

aReferences [ 6 ] and [ 7 ] ; final p H was 9 .5-10 .0 bSolution A contained (g/L): H3B03, 2.85; MnC12-4H20, 1.81; ZnS04-7H2, 0.22; CuSO4-5H20, 0.08; Na2MoO4" 2H20, 0.015. cSolution B contained (g/L) : NH4V03, 0.023; KCr (S04) 2" 12H20, 0.096; NiS04- 7H20, 0.048; Na2WO4-2H20, 0.018; Ti2(SO4)a, 0.04; COC12"6H20, 0.044.

gest that it is an excellent food source for man and animals because of its high protein content, low content of nucleic acids, high concentrations of vitamins and other growth factors, and the presence of a cell wall that is easily digestible when compared to that of yeast or algae. Because it has these qualities and the fact that it is easily harvested, due to its spiral shape and presence of gas vac- uoles, it is a potential feedstock or energy crop for the production of methane by anaerobic bacteria [ 3,4 ]. S. maxima is capable of using atmospheric carbon dioxide as a carbon source, has the potential to grow in sea water [ 5 ], or can use agricultural waste products as a growth substrate [ 6,7]. The objectives of these studies were to compare mesophilic (35 ° C) and thermophilic ( 55 ° C) fermentations at short retention times using biomass of the cyanobacterium, S. maxima as the sole substrate for methane production.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

S. maxima was cultured at room temperature (25°C) in 38-L aquariums using the medium listed in Table 1 [6,7]. The organism was harvested and concentrated to a slurry containing 12% total solids with an Amicon DC2 hol- low-fiber ultra-filtration system using HIP-100-20 filter cartridges (Amicon Corporation, Danvers, MA ), placed on a 38 p m ( 400 mesh) screen, rinsed with distilled water, bottled at a specific VS concentration, and stored at - 2 0 ° C until used.

Daily fed digesters consisted of 500 mL aspirator bottles operated with a 200

Page 3: Thermophilic and mesophilic methane production from anaerobic degradation of the cyanobacterium Spirulina maxima

21

mL working volume. They were placed in chambers maintained at 35 and 55 ° C. Inocula for the digesters came from cattle waste digesters maintained at the same temperatures. Digesters were fed once-per-day with S. maxima biomass at 2.25% VS and at retention times (0) of 8, 12, and 16 days. Digester contents were mixed with a magnetic stir bar for one min before and after feeding.

Slurries fed and withdrawn from the digesters were analyzed for total solids, VS, alkalinity (to pH 3.7), pH, and total volatile acids (TVA or actic acid, silicic acid method) using standard methods for waste water analyses [8]. Organic nitrogen (Kjeldahl) was determined as described by Wael and Gehrke [9]. Individual volatile fatty acids were measured using a Hewlett Packard Model 5840A gas chromatograph with dual flame ionization detectors. Coiled glass columns {0.32 cm ID by 183 cm) packed with 15% SP-1220 and 1% H~PO4 on 100/200 mesh Chromosorb WAW (Supelco, Inc., Bellefonte, PA) were used for the separation of acids. Nitrogen carrier-gas flow was 40 mL/min and injector, oven and detector temperatures were 200, 125 and 250 ° C, respec- tively. Ammonia was determined colorimetrically using phenol hypochlorite [ 10 ]. Chemical oxygen demand (COD) was determined using the Standard Ampule Method (O.I. Corporation, Ampule C.O.D. Operating Procedure Manual, Dallas, TX) .

Biogas from digesters was collected in gas-impermeable bags. Gas volume was measured by solution displacement (water saturated with NaC1) and cor- rected for temperature and pressure to standard conditions. Gas composition was analyzed by gas chromatography as previously described [ 10 ].

Digesters were assumed to be in steady-state conditions after three volume turnovers. Samples were analyzed on four consecutive days once steady state was achieved. Retention time was then reduced to the next lower level. Each temperature (35 and 55 °C ) and 0 (8, 12, 16 days ) were replicated.

Batch digesters maintained at 35 ° C were used to determine ultimate meth- ane yield (Bo). These digesters, which were run in duplicate, consisted of 120 mL serum bottles with a 50 mL working volume. They were started with in- oculum from the daily fed digesters. A mineral-salts solution [ 11 ] was added to control digesters in place of the cyanobacterial substrate. The 35 °C diges- ters were incubated for 105 days, during which time gas volume was periodi- cally determined as described by Owen et al. [ 12 ], and composition as described above. The ultimate methane yield (Bo) was calculated by subtracting the average accumulated methane volume of the inoculum from the average ac- cumulated methane volume of the cyanobacterium plus inoculum, and the dif- ference was divided by the mass of cyanobacteria fermented.

RESULTS

Preliminary studies indicated that the cyanobacterial biomass as harvested from the growth medium (Table 1 ) generated a pH greater than 8.0 in the 35

Page 4: Thermophilic and mesophilic methane production from anaerobic degradation of the cyanobacterium Spirulina maxima

22

TABLE 2

Data from fermentation of Spirulina maxima at 35 ° C a

Parameter Retention t ime (days)

8 12 16

Methane production L CH4/L-day 0.47 + 0.01 0.41 _+ 0.008 0.31 _+ 0.003 L CH4/g COD fed 0.09 _+ 0.002 0.15 _+ 0.005 0.15 +__ 0.001

CH4 (%) 61.2 ___0.2 65.6 _+1.4 61.7 _+0.3 COD reduction (%) 27.8 _+1.3 39.8 _+2.0 37.4 _+ 1.9 Total VFA's (g/L) 4.07 _+ 0.06 2.58_+ 0.08 3.13 _+ 0.03

Acetate 2.87 _+ 0.10 2.16_+ 0.07 2.67 _+ 0.03 Propionate 0.40 _+ 0.03 0.11 _+ 0.008 0.16 _+ 0.006 Butyrate 0.09 _+ 0.003 0.01 _+ 0.002 0.15 _+ 0.001 Isobutyrate 0.21 _ 0.001 0.04 _+ 0.003 0.58 _+ 0.001 Valerate 0.01 -+ 0.001 0 0 Isovalerate 0.47 _+ 0.01 0.26 -+ 0.005 0.22 _+ 0.001

Organic nitrogen (g/L) 2.65 _+ 0.08 2.52 _+ 0.10 Ammonia nitrogen (g/L) 1.55 _+ 0.17 1.12 _+ 0.10 Alkalinity (g C a C O J L ) 7.00 _ 0.07 7.03 _+ 0.05 7.03 _+ 0.06 pH 7.05 _+ 0.01 7.27 _+ 0.02 7.20 _+ 0.01 /(0 1.6 1.5 2.1

aMean _+ S.E. from four analyses on four consecutive days. Feed concentration (Sto) was 22.5 g VS/L. bKinetic parameter [ 14].

and 55 °C digesters, which eventually caused the fermentations to fall. Thus, it was necessary to rinse the biomass with water after it had been harvested to dilute the mineral salts which created the high alkaline conditions. Once this was done no further problems were experienced with high pH.

Results from Table 2 indicate that the maximum amount of methane pro- duced from fermentation of S. maxima at 35 ° C was 0.47 L CH4/L-day at 0 -- 8 days. This compares to 0.31 L CHt/L-day at 0-12 days for the 55°C digesters (Table 3). The percentage of CHt in the biogas was slightly higher for the 35°C digesters (maximum 65.6% at 0=12 days) than the 55°C digesters (maximum 63.2% at 0=12 days). The biogas in the 55°C digesters at 0=8 days contained 48.7% CHt, which suggeted that some form of inhibition was occurring at this 0. COD reduction ofbiomass was greater in the 35 ° C digesters with a maximum reduction ( 39.8% ) occurring at 0 = 12 days.

The total VFA's in both the 35 and 55 ° C digester contents were much higher than what might be expected from digesters containing an equivalent amount of organic matter in the form of animal waste [ 11,13 ]. The contents from the 55 ° C digester, 0 = 8 days, contained the highest level of acids, 678 g/L, which again suggested that some factor was inhibiting the fermentation. The concen-

Page 5: Thermophilic and mesophilic methane production from anaerobic degradation of the cyanobacterium Spirulina maxima

TABLE 3

Data from fermentation of Spirulina maxima at 55 ° C a

23

Parameter Retention t ime (days)

8 12 16

Methane production L C H J L - d a y 0.20 ± 0.005 0.31 ± 0.10 0.19 4- 0.004 L C H J g COD fed 0.05 ± 0.001 0.11 _ 0.003 0.09 ± 0.001

CH4 (%) 48.7 _+0.2 63.2 _+0.9 57.2 ±0.8 COD reduction (%) 22.6 ± 1.2 31.8 ± 1.9 30.9 ± 1.6 Total VFA's (g/L) 6.78 ___ 0.11 4.18 ± 0.11 4.07 ± 0.09

Acetate 4.17 _ 0.08 1.81 ± 0.08 1.83 ± 0.07 Propionate 1.17 ___ 0.01 1.30 ± 0.01 1.15 ± 0.03 Butyrate 0.26 ± 0.006 0.08 ± 0.007 0.06 ± 0.004 Isobutyrate 0.36 ± 0.006 0.31 ± 0.003 0.20 ± 0.005 Valerate 0.01 ___ 0.001 0.02 ± 0.002 0.03 ± 0.001 Isovalerate 0.78 ± 0.01 0.59 ± 0.008 0.82 ± 0.01

Organic nitrogen (g/L) 2.66 ± 0.08 2.56 ± 0.10 Ammonia nitrogen (g/L) 1.86 ± 0.17 1.20 ± 0.06 Alkalinity (g C a C O J L ) 7.80 ± 0.07 7.85 ± 0.03 7.83 ± 0.05 pH 6.97 ± 0.04 7.47 ± 0.02 7.45 ± 0.03 / ~ 13.7 6.4 11.4

aMean + S.E. from four analyses on four consecutive days. Feed concentration (Sto) was 22.5 g VS/L. bKinetic parameter [ 14].

"~ 0 , 2 5 . 2 c l 0 o 0.20,

I 0 .15. r,D

.-J

d O.lO. ..J w >-

w z 0 . 0 5 -

I

0.00 0 2'o 4'o do go 15o

Doy

Fig. 1. Ultimate methane yield (Bo) from batch fermentation of S. maxima at 35 ° C.

trations of branched-chain acids, isobutyrate and isovalerate, were proportion- aly higher than the concentration of these acids found in typical animal waste fermentations, and higher than the respective straight-chain acids, presum-

Page 6: Thermophilic and mesophilic methane production from anaerobic degradation of the cyanobacterium Spirulina maxima

24

ably because of the high protein content of the algal biomass. Organic and ammonia nitrogen varied little between the contents of the 35 and 55 °C diges- ters. The ammonia nitrogen was approximately 3 to 5 times higher in these digesters than in digesters fed swine manure at a similar substrate concentra- tion [14]. The pH of the digesters remained in a range (6.97 to 7.47) satisfac- tory for methanogenic fermentation after washing the biomass. The washing reduced the pH of the substrate from 9.5 to 8.0.

Figure 1 shows the change in ultimate methane yield with time during the batch fermentation of S. maxima at 35 ° C. Approximately 90% of the methane is produced in the first 20 days of the fermentation. After 105 days, the meth- ane yield was 0.22 L CH4/g COD fed or 0.33 L CH4/g VS fed.

DISCUSSION

The data in Tables 2 and 3 indicate that biomass from S. maxima can serve as the sole substrate for methane production at 35 or 55 ° C. No advantages were found with the thermophilic fermentation. The methane yield from S. maxima at 0 = 12 and 16 days is approximately 80 to 90% that of beef cattle manure at 35°C, but only 50 to 60% at 55°C [15]. This suggests that some nutrients may be lacking, a poor C/N ratio exists, or toxic compounds are present or are generated in the fermentation at 55 ° C. Less stability at 55 °C was observed as indicated by the higher concentration of volatile fatty acids and pH below 7.0 at 0 -- 8 days. The kinetic parameter (K) was calculated for each set of conditions by the procedures described elsewhere [ 14 ] and shown in Tables 2 and 3. The K values ranged from 1.5 to 2.1 for the 35°C fermen- tations and from 6.4 to 13.7 for the 55 ° C fermentations. The higher K values for the thermophilic fermentations indicate that they were inhibited much more than the mesophilic fermentations. Thus, a mesophilic fermentation may be the preferred temperture for methane production from S. maxima. This agrees with the study of Samson and LeDuy [ 4 ] in which they found 35 ° C to be more efficient than 52 ° C in degradation of this alga to methane.

Although the ultimate methane yield at infinite hydraulic retention time from the cyanobacterial biomass at 35 ° C may be comparable to that obtained from cattle waste [ 15 ], the maximum methane production rate is significantly lower than that obtainable with cattle or swine waste because loading rates can be greater with these wastes before digester failure occurs. It was not possible to successfully operate the S. maxima digesters at 0 = 6 days, whereas cattle waste digesters are routinely operated at this 0 and lower [ 10,16,17]. Methane production rates of 4.5 [15] and 6.1 L CHt/L-day [14] have been obtained with cattle waste and 3.2 L CHt/L-day with swine waste [13]. The highest methane production rate we obtained in this study and that obtained by Sam- son and LeDuy [ 4 ] with S. maxima biomass was 0.47 and 0.40 L CH4/L-day, respectively. Thus, from a practical viewpoint, a much greater volume of meth-

Page 7: Thermophilic and mesophilic methane production from anaerobic degradation of the cyanobacterium Spirulina maxima

25

ane can be produced from cattle or swine waste in a shorter period of time if the digester size is constant. Therefore, with the high protein content of S. maxima, future studies may be warranted to look further into feeding the bio- mass to livestock. Some studies have already shown promising potential in this area [6,7].

Comparing results from this study and that of Samson and LeDuy [ 4 ], sug- gest that loading rate appears to be a sensitive parameter governing perform- ance at thermophilic temperatures, which is not overcome by a longer retention time. The digesters used here at 55°C, fed at 22.5 g VS/L and 0=12 days produced 0.31 L CH4/L-day; while the digesters of Samson and LeDuy at 52 ° C, fed 40 g VS/L and 0 = 20 days, produced only 0.07 L CH4/L-day. Volatile acids (g/L) , alkalinity (g/L) and ammonia nitrogen values (g/L) for this study were 4.2, 7.8 and 1.2, respectively; while the values from Samson and LeDuy's study were 8.3, 12.1 and 2.7, respectively, which are normally considered too high for an efficient methane fermentation.

The preliminary studies conducted (data not shown ) indicated that contin- uous mixing was not beneficial to the cyanobacterial biomass fermentation. This agrees with Samson and LeDuy [ 4 ] who found that intermittent mixing was adequate.

The ultimate methane yield we obtained in this study after 105 days at 35 ° C (0.33 L/g VS fed) is higher than the yield (0.26 L/g VS fed) reported for S. maxima fermented at 0 -- 33 days [ 3 ], and for the marine alga Ulva sp. (0.22 to 0.33 L/g VS fed) and Gracilaria tikvahiae (0.19 to 0.22 L/g VS fed) batch- fermented for 58 days [ 17 ]. However, it is very similar to Samson and LeDuy's later study [4] with S. maxima in which they reported 0.35 L/g VS fed with digesters operated at 0--30 days and a loading rate of 20 g VS/L. Anaerobic degradation of biomass from Scenedesmus spp. and Chlorella spp. produced a maximum methane yield of 0.31 L CH4/g VS fed [ 18].

Further studies with the anaerobic digestion of S. maxima should include those in which the C/N ratio is adjusted. Samson and LeDuy [4] reported a C/N ratio of 4.2 with biomass of S. maxima, which is well below the ideal ratio of 12 to 14. Addition of municipal refuse or straw, which are high in carbon and low in nitrogen may have some potential in increasing the methane pro- duction rate.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We appreciate the technical assistance of Dave Sypherd.

Page 8: Thermophilic and mesophilic methane production from anaerobic degradation of the cyanobacterium Spirulina maxima

26

REFERENCES

1 Ciferri, O., 1983. Spirulina, the edible microorganism. Microbiol. Rev., 47: 551-578. 2 Ciferri, O. and Tiboni, O., 1985. The biochemistry and industrial potential of Spirulina. Ann.

Rev. Microbiol., 39: 503-526. 3 Samson, R. and DeDuy, A., 1982. Biogas production from anaerobic digestion of Spirulina

maxima algal biomass. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 24: 1919-1924. 4 Samson, R. and LeDuy, A., 1986. Detailed study of anaerobic digestion of Spirulina maxima

algal biomass. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 28: 1014-1023. 5 Materassi, R., Tredici, M. and Balloni, W., 1984. Spirulina culture in sea-water. Appl. Mi-

crobiol. Biotechnol., 19: 384-386. 6 Wu, J.F. and Pond, W.G., 1981. Amino acid composition and microbial contamination of

Spirulina maxima, a blue-green alga, grown on the effluent of different fermented animal wastes. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 27: 151-159.

7 Chung, P., Pond, W.G., Kingsbury, Walker, Jr., E.F. and Krook, L., 1978. Production and nutritive value of Arthrospira platensis, a spiral blue-green alga grown on swine wastes. J. Anim. Sci., 47: 319-330.

8 American Public Health Association, 1975. Standard methods for examination of water and waste water. American Public Health Association, Inc., New York, NY, 14th edn.

9 Wael, L.L. and Gehrke, C.W., 1975. An automated total protein nitrogen method. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 48: 1221-1226.

10 Varel, V.H., Hashimoto, A.G. and Chen, Y.R., 1980. Effect of temperature and retention time on methane production from beef cattle waste. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 40: 217-222.

11 Hashimoto, A.G., Varel, V.H. and Chen, Y.R., 1981. Ultimate methane yield from beef cattle manure: Effect of temperature, ration, constituents, antibiotics, and manure age. Agric. Wastes, 3: 241-256.

12 Owen, W.F., Stuckey, D.C., Healy, Jr., J.B., Young, L.Y. and McCarty, P.L., 1979. Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Res., 13: 485-492.

13 Varel, V.H. and Hashimoto, A.G., 1981. Effect of dietary monensin of chlorotetracycline on methane production from cattle waste. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 41: 29-34.

14 Hashimoto, A.G., 1984. Methane from swine manure: Effect of temperature and influent substrate concentration on kinetic parameter (K). Agric. Wastes, 9: 299-308.

15 Hashimoto, A.G., 1982. Methane production from cattle wastes: Effects of temperature, hy- draulic retention time and influent substrate concentration on kinetic parameter (K). Bio- technol. Bioeng., 24: 2039-2052.

16 Varel, V.H., Isacson, H.R. and Bryant, M.P., 1977. Thermophilic membrane production from cattle waste. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 33: 298-307.

17 Habig, C., De Busk, T.A. and Ryther, J.H., 1984. The effect of nitrogen content on methane production by the marine algae Gracilaria tikvahiae and Ulva sp., Biomass, 4: 239-251.

18 Golueke, C.G., Oswald, W.J. and Gotass, H.B., 1957. Fermentation of algae biomass from oxidation ponds. Appl. Microbiol., 5: 47-54.


Top Related