Transcript
Page 1: Thermomechanical and surface properties of novel poly(ether urethane)/polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane nanohybrid elastomers

Thermomechanical and Surface Properties of NovelPoly(ether urethane)/Polyhedral OligomericSilsesquioxane Nanohybrid Elastomers

Juanjuan Tan,1,2 Zhiyuan Jia,1,2 Dekun Sheng,1,2 Xin Wen,1,2 Yuming Yang1

1 Key Laboratory of Polymer Ecomaterials, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun 130022, China

2 Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 10080, China

A series of linear polyurethane (PU) elastomerscontaining various amounts (ca. 2–10 wt%) of a diol-functionalized polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane(diolPOSS) were synthesized from organic solventdispersions. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopywas used to characterize the chemical structure of thediolPOSS-reinforced PU. Transmission electron micros-copy (TEM) indicated that the diolPOSS aggregationwas formed in the polymer matrix at the scale of 20–50nm. The introduction of diolPOSS into such system ledto high glass transition temperature, enhanced storagemodulus, and improved stability compared with thepristine PU according to the differential scanning calo-rimetry, dynamic mechanical analysis, and thermalgravimetric analysis, respectively. Moreover, contactangle measurements indicated a significant enhance-ment in surface hydrophobicity as well as a reductionin surface free energy after introducing diolPOSSinto the synthesized PU. The improvement of surfaceproperties could be ascribed to the enrichment ofthe diolPOSS moiety on the surface of the hybrids.POLYM. ENG. SCI., 51:795–803, 2011. ª 2011 Society ofPlastics Engineers

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, organic–inorganic hybrid composites

have undergone a significant evolution because of the

outstanding properties of these materials compared with

pristine polymers [1]. Polyhedral oligomeric silses-

quioxane (POSS)-based polymers are emerging as one

of the most promising high-performance materials for

fundamental studies as well as industrial applications.

POSS, first reported in 1946 [2], is a cube-octameric

molecule with an inner inorganic Si��O��Si framework

that is externally covered with reactive or nonreactive

organic substituents, so it possesses organic–inorganic

hybrid structure at molecular level. POSS moieties can

be incorporated into polymer systems through either

simple melt/solution blending [3, 4] or polymerization

via functional substituents at the vertexes of POSS

cages [5, 6]. The resulting POSS–polymer hybrid sys-

tems displayed various significantly enhanced proper-

ties, including increased toughness, decreased flamma-

bility, ultraviolet stability, and oxidation resistance [7,

8]. In most cases, the enhanced properties are achieved

by incorporation of only small amounts (\10 wt%) of

POSS that are far below the levels needed for tradi-

tional fillers.

Polyurethane (PU), a well-known versatile engineering

material, can be tailored to meet the highly diversified

demands of modern technologies, such as coatings, adhe-

sives, reaction injection molding, fibers, foams, rubbers,

thermoplastics elastomers, and composites [9, 10]. With

the increasing demand in a wide range of application,

considerable academic and industrial efforts have been

devoted to preparing novel PU materials with improved

properties. During the past years, extensive work has been

reported in the literature on the modification of PUs via

POSS. The PU/POSS hybrids are normally obtained from

waterborne dispersions or nondispersions. In previous

studies, two typical kinds of POSS with different func-

tional groups have been synthesized into PU from homo-

geneous aqueous solution [11–14]. The first one is 2,3-

propanediol propoxy-heptaisobutyl-POSS (diol-POSS),

which significantly reduced the surface free energy and

thus increased surface hydrophobicity of PUs [11, 12].

The second one is 3-(2-aminoethylamino) propyl-heptai-

sobutyl-POSS (diamino-POSS), which was incorporated

into aqueous PU dispersions [13, 14] to enhance the ther-

momechanical and surface properties of PU. As for the

Correspondence to: Yuming Yang; e-mail: [email protected]

Contract grant sponsor: Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Contract grant sponsor: Commission of Science Technology and Industry

for National Defense.

DOI 10.1002/pen.21877

Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com).

VVC 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers

POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2011

Page 2: Thermomechanical and surface properties of novel poly(ether urethane)/polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane nanohybrid elastomers

PU/POSS hybrids obtained from nondispersions, Neu-

mann et al. [15] reported the synthesis of an octa(isocya-

nate)-functionalized POSS macromer, which can subse-

quently be used to prepare organic–inorganic hybrid PUs.

Zheng and coworkers [16, 17] used octa-functional POSS

as cross-linking agents to react with PU prepolymer to

form octa-armed star-like PU prepolymer with silses-

quioxane core, and then the chain was extended into PU

networks. Fu et al. [18, 19] prepared PU elastomers con-

taining octasiloxane–POSS used for a chain extender

through one of its corner groups grafting onto the macro-

molecular backbone of PU chains. Janowski and Pieli-

chowski [20] investigated the thermo(oxidative) stability

of PU/POSS nanohybrid elastomers using thermal gravi-

metric analysis (TGA). Oaten and Choudhury [21] synthe-

sized transparent PU hybrid containing an open-cage

POSS for thin film application.

In this work, a new type of diolPOSS was chosen

as precursor for PU synthesis. The whole synthetic pro-

cess was performed in two mixed organic solvents to

improve the dispersion of the monomers and facilitate

the polymerization reaction. The purpose of this article

is to prepare a novel poly(ether urethane)/POSS nano-

hybrid elastomer and investigate the effect of POSS on

the thermomechanical and surface properties of PU

elastomers in detail.

EXPERIMENT

Materials

4,40-Diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI), poly(pro-

pylene glycol) (PPG, Mw ¼ 2000), and dibutyltin dilau-

rate (DBTDL) catalyst were purchased from Aldrich.

MDI and DBTDL were used as received, and PPG was

dehydrated under vacuum at 1108C for 2 hr before use.

Trans-CyclohexaneDiolIsobutyl POSS (C36H78O14Si8,

diolPOSS), a white powder, was obtained from Hybrid

Plastics (USA). The molecular structure is given in

Scheme 1. 1,4-Butanediol (BDO), toluene, and n-hexanewere purchased from Shanghai Chemical Reagent Co.

(Shanghai, China). BDO was distilled under reduced pres-

sure. Toluene and n-hexane were dried over 4 A molecu-

lar sieves and then distilled from sodium benzophenone

ketyl for further purification.

Preparation of Samples

In a dry 250-mL three-necked round-bottom flask

equipped with a mechanical stirrer, a nitrogen inlet, and a

condenser, MDI and diolPOSS were first dissolved into

mixed solvents of toluene and n-hexane under ultrasonic

SCHEME 1. Synthesis of the PU–diolPOSS hybrids.

796 POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2011 DOI 10.1002/pen

Page 3: Thermomechanical and surface properties of novel poly(ether urethane)/polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane nanohybrid elastomers

dispersion and then allowed to react with each other for 30

min with the existence of DBTDL at room temperature.

Later, calculated PPG (NCO Index ¼ 2:1, where [NCO]

and [OH] are the concentration of NCO groups of MDI and

total OH groups of diolPOSS and PPG, respectively) was

charged into the flask while stirring, and the reaction flask

was immersed in an oil bath at 608C. The isocyanate

(NCO) content was monitored during the reaction using the

standard dibutylamine back-titration method [22]. About 1

hr later, the NCO content reached the theoretical NCO

value (the content of left NCO was nearly 50% of that in

the original state). Then, the prepolymer was chain

extended with BDO, and the reaction continued for another

3 hr at 608C to complete polymerization. Finally, the mix-

tures were precipitated with n-hexane after some additional

toluene added and dried under vacuum at 608C for 1 week.

The pristine PU was prepared in the same way without

addition of diolPOSS and n-hexane.The films of the pristine PU and PU hybrids with dif-

ferent concentrations of diolPOSS were hot pressed at

1608C and 10 MPa with a hold time of 3 min, followed

by quenching to room temperature between two thick

metal blocks.

Measurements

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy. Fourier

transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) measurements

were conducted on a FTIR-6100 spectrometer (JASCO,

Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an IMV-4000 multichannel

infrared microscope (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan) and a MCT

detector in the transmission mode at room temperature.

The sample films were prepared by dissolving the poly-

mers with tetrahydrofuran (10 wt%) and then the solu-

tions casting onto KBr windows. The residual solvent was

removed in a vacuum oven at 608C for 2 hr. In all cases,

the spectra was recorded 32 scans at a resolution of 2/cm

in the wavenumber range of 4000–500 cm21.

Wide-Angle X-ray Diffraction. Wide-angle x-ray dif-

fraction (WAXD) experiments were performed by the use of

Rigaku D/Max-II B X-ray diffractometer with a Cu anode

(CuKa1 ¼ 1.5406 A). DiolPOSS powder and 1-mm thick

PU hybrid films were analyzed by WAXD at room condi-

tions. All of the measurements were operated at 40 kV and

200 mA from 4 to 408 at a 2y scan rate of 28/min.

Transmission Electron Microscopy. The morphology

of PU/POSS hybrids was observed using a transmission

electron microscope (TEM) (JEOL JEM-1011). The speci-

men for TEM observations was about 50–60-nm in thick-

ness, which was prepared by ultramicrotoming under

cryogenic conditions using a leica ultramictome (Ultracut

R with FCS).

Differential Scanning Calorimetry. The calorimetric

measurements were performed on a TA Instrument differ-

ential scanning calorimetry (DSC) Q20 with a Universal

Analysis 2000 under a continuous dry nitrogen purge (50

mL/min). Indium was used for temperature and enthalpy

calibration. All samples were sealed in aluminum pans

with mass in the range of 5–10 mg. All measurements

were conducted at a heating rate of 108C/min following

heat–cool–heat procedure from 280 to 1208C. Glass tran-sition temperatures (Tg) were determined by the midpoint

of enthalpy change during the second heating.

Dynamic Mechanical Analysis. The dynamic mechani-

cal tests were performed on DMA/SDTA861e (Mettler

Toledo, Switzerland) in the shear-sandwich mode. The

samples were cut on the 1-mm thick PU films with a di-

ameter of 10 mm and measured under a nitrogen atmos-

phere from 2100 to 1308C at a heating rate of 38C/min,

a frequency of 1 Hz, and a deformation �0.3%.

Thermal Gravimetric Analysis. A Mettler Toledo

TGA STAR gravimetric analyzer was used to investigate

the thermal stability of all PU samples. The specimens

(about 10 mg) were heated under a nitrogen atmosphere

from ambient temperature up to 6008C at a heating rate

of 208C/min in all cases. The temperature at which the

rate of mass loss (Tmax) is up to maximum was evaluated

from the differential thermogravimetry curves.

Contact Angle Measurements. The static contact angle

measurements with ultrapure water and diiodomethane

were performed on a Kruss DSA100 (Germany) apparatus.

A droplet of water (or diiodomethane) was dropped onto

the surface of PU films about 5–10 lm. The evolution of

the droplet shape was recorded by a CCD video camera and

analyzed to determine the contact angle. About 10 inde-

pendent measurements were performed and the average

contact angle was reported. The specimens were dried in a

vacuum oven for 12 hr before measurement.

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. X-ray photoelec-

tron spectroscopy (XPS) experiments of PU hybrid films

were performed on a ThermoElectron ESCALAB 250

spectrometer at room temperature by using an Al and K

X-ray source (1486.6 eV). The spectra were recorded at

908 takeoff angle with 100 eV pass energy. The binding

energies were calibrated by using the containment carbon

(C 1s ¼ 284.6 eV).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Preparation of the Inorganic–Organic Hybrids

The synthesis process of PU–diolPOSS hybrids is illus-

trated in Scheme 1. The contents of diolPOSS in the

hybrids were set at 2, 5, 8, and 10 wt%, and the corre-

sponding samples were marked as PU2, PU5, PU8, and

PU10, respectively. The compositions of the pristine PU

DOI 10.1002/pen POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2011 797

Page 4: Thermomechanical and surface properties of novel poly(ether urethane)/polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane nanohybrid elastomers

and PU–diolPOSS hybrids are summarized in Table 1. To

compensate for the inclusion of diolPOSS monomers, the

content of PPG was reduced from 77 to 65 wt% of the

whole hybrids as the diolPOSS content varied from 0 to

10 wt%. All samples can dissolve completely into polar

solvents such as N,N-dimethylformamide and tetrahydro-

furan, which proved that there was no covalent cross-link-

ing in their molecular structure.

The FTIR spectra of the diolPOSS, the pristine PU,

and PU–diolPOSS hybrids are shown in Fig. 1. For the

pristine PU, the stretching vibrations of the N��H groups

occurred at 3300 cm21, together with the carbonyl bands

at 1732 cm21 were indicative of the presence of urethane

moieties. For the diolPOSS, the broad band above 3000

cm21 was typical of the stretching vibrations of the

hydroxyl groups, and the band at 1106 cm21 was ascribed

to the stretching vibration of Si��O��Si groups in the sil-

sesquioxane cages. For the PU–diolPOSS hybrids, this

band at 1106 cm21 unfortunately overlapped with that of

the aliphatic ether C��O��C. It is worth noticing that the

disappearance of the bands at 2250–2275 cm21, which

are characteristic of isocyanate, indicated the completed

reaction between the hydroxyl and isocyanate groups.

WAXD

Figure 2 shows the WAXD patterns of the diolPOSS

monomer and all synthesized samples. The pure diolPOSS

monomer presented characteristic diffraction peaks at 2yof 8.18, 10.88, 12.08, and 18.98, corresponding to the crys-

tallization of POSS, which are similar to the previous

reports [12, 13]. In particular, the most intense and sharp-

est diffraction peak at 2y of 8.18 is attributed to the 101

reflection of POSS rhombohedral unit cell [23]. In con-

trast, the pristine PU (PU0) showed only one broad amor-

phous halo centered at 2y of 19.58. With the incorporation

of 2 wt% POSS, the pattern of PU2 resembled that of

PU0; with further increase of diolPOSS content, the dif-

fraction for PU0 still existed, and the peak shifted to a

slightly lower angle, indicating that the introduction of

diolPOSS expanded the intermolecular main chain spac-

ing. When the content of diolPOSS was [2 wt%, another

broad peak appeared at 2y of 9.18, which should be

ascribed to the aggregation of diolPOSS, indicating the

partial crystallization of diolPOSS in the hybrids [13, 24].

But the deviation from the diffraction of pure diolPOSS

indicated that the presence of diolPOSS in hybrids was

different from the 3D crystals of pure diolPOSS mono-

mer. It is apparent that the crystallization behavior and

crystal morphology of diolPOSS were influenced by the

pendent state in the long polymer chains.

Morphology of the PU–diolPOSS Hybrids

For further confirming the diolPOSS distribution in the

hybrids, the morphology of the diolPOSS-containing PU

hybrids was observed by TEM. Figure 3 representatively

shows the TEM micrograph of the hybrids containing 5

wt% (PU5) and 10 wt% (PU10) of diolPOSS. According

to the difference in transmitted electronic density between

organic PU polymer and inorganic POSS component, the

TABLE 1. Compositions of PU–diolPOSS hybrids.

Samples

DiolPOSS

% (w/w)

MDI %

(w/w)

PPG %

(w/w)

BDO %

(w/w) Molar ratio of reactantsa

PU0 0.0 19.3 77.2 3.5 2.000:0.000:1.000:1.000

PU2 2.0 19.7 74.7 3.6 2.000:0.053:0.946:1.000

PU5 5.0 20.3 71.0 3.7 2.000:0.128:0.872:1.000

PU8 8.0 21.1 67.1 3.8 2.000:0.202:0.798:1.000

PU10 10.0 21.4 64.7 3.9 2.000:0.244:0.756:1.000

a The reactants are MDI, diolPOSS, PPG, and BDO.

FIG. 1. FTIR spectra of the diolPOSS, the pristine PU, and PU hybrids

containing diolPOSS.

FIG. 2. WAXD patterns of the diolPOSS monomer, the pristine PU,

and PU–diolPOSS hybrids.

798 POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2011 DOI 10.1002/pen

Page 5: Thermomechanical and surface properties of novel poly(ether urethane)/polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane nanohybrid elastomers

dark area is assigned to the POSS domains, whereas the

white region to PU matrix. As can be seen, at relatively

low diolPOSS content such as 5 wt%, only small amounts

of diolPOSS-aggregated spherical particles were found

(Fig. 3a); However, at relatively high diolPOSS concen-

trations such as 10 wt%, significant aggregation was

found, and the particle diameter was about 20–50 nm

(Fig. 3b). The results are in good agreement with those of

WAXD, further suggesting that diolPOSS aggregations

were formed, and the aggregation extent enhanced with

the diolPOSS content increasing.

Thermal Behavior

DSC analysis of samples detected only the glass transi-

tion of the polyether phase (the soft phase), without evi-

dence of other higher temperature thermal transitions (the

hard phase) [12]. The pristine PU and diolPOSS-contain-

ing PU hybrids were subjected to thermal analysis and the

DSC curves are presented in Fig. 4. It can be seen that

the pristine PU displayed a glass transition at 2428C,much lower than room temperature, indicating that this

material is a typical elastomer in the ambient condition.

For the diolPOSS-containing hybrids, all of the DSC ther-

mograms displayed single glass transition temperatures

(Tgs) in the experimental temperature range (280 to

1208C). With an increasing fraction of diolPOSS in the

polymer, the Tg is slightly shifting to a higher tempera-

ture. This result was in good agreement with many other

kinds of POSS-containing materials, such as POSS-rein-

forced epoxy resins [25, 26], POSS/PMMA composites

[27], styrene/styryl-POSS [28], and poly(norbornene-co-norbornene POSS) [29] copolymers. In the reports of Xu

et al. [30], it was interpreted that the Tg of hybrid poly-

mer depended on three factors: (1) inert diluent role of

POSS to reduce the self-association dipole–dipole interac-

tion of parent polymer molecules (negative contribution),

(2) the dipole–dipole interaction between POSS siloxane

and the polar carbonyl of organic polymer species, and

(3) the POSS–POSS inter-and/or intermolecular interac-

tion. In our case, the POSS–PU and POSS–POSS interac-

tion played a dominant role and resulted in an increase of

Tg. It is worth noticing that although the Tgs of the PU

hybrids were higher than that of the pristine PU, they did

not vary significantly with the content of diolPOSS

increasing, and the Tg of the hybrid with 10 wt% dio-

lPOSS only increased to 2358C. In Lee’s opinion [25],

the presence of POSS cages, because of their nanoscopic

size and their chemical incorporation directly into the

polymer chains, effectively hindered the motion of macro-

molecular chains, thus the Tg of the matrix increased. In

the present case, the rigid diolPOSS cages were tethered

to the hard segments of PU macromolecular chains, so

the confinement effect on molecular chain motion of soft

segments was not evident. This speculation will be con-

firmed in the following dynamic mechanical analysis

(DMA) results. Furthermore, it is noted that the width of

FIG. 3. TEM images for the PU containing 5 wt% (a) and 10 wt% (b) diolPOSS hybrids.

FIG. 4. The DSC curves of the pristine PU and PU–diolPOSS hybrids

at a heating rate of 108C/min.

DOI 10.1002/pen POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2011 799

Page 6: Thermomechanical and surface properties of novel poly(ether urethane)/polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane nanohybrid elastomers

the endothermic transition was not affected with the addi-

tion of diolPOSS. This fact suggested that these diolPOSS

cages were completely incorporated within the chains and

did not form macroscopic phase-separated domains.

Dynamic Mechanical Properties

DMA was measured to characterize the dependence of

viscoelastic properties on temperature for the pristine PU

and PU–diolPOSS hybrids. The shear storage modulus

(G0) and loss tangent (tand) for all samples are shown in

Fig. 5a and b, revealing the dependences on diolPOSS

content. As shown in Fig. 5a, it is obvious that the stor-

age moduli of the glassy state for all diolPOSS-containing

hybrids are close to that of the pristine PU. However, the

introduction of diolPOSS brought the enhancement of the

storage modulus in the rubbery state, and the increase

trend was dependent on the diolPOSS loading. The dio-

lPOSS cages were chemically bonded to the macromolec-

ular chains during polymerization, indicating that the

incorporation of diolPOSS into the PU interrupted the

movements of polymer chains because of the reinforcing

effect of diolPOSS [31]. In the glassy state, the molecular

chain segments were frozen, so the rigid cages of dio-

lPOSS had little contribution to the modulus; along with

temperature rising, the molecular chain segments went

into motion, whereas the rigid diolPOSS cages would

hold back.

The loss factor tand, calculated as the ratio of the loss

modulus to storage modulus, is sensitive to structural

transformation of the material. As shown in Fig. 5b, there

were two peaks in the tand � temperature curves for the

pristine PU because the sensitivity of DMA is much

higher than that of DSC [32]. One was located at 2308C,a well-defined relaxation peak, which was attributed to

the glass transition of the soft segments in the matrix.

With the incorporation of diolPOSS, this relaxation peak

shifted to higher temperature regularly accompanied with

significantly broadened width and declined height. But it

was still lower than 2208C when the diolPOSS content

reached 10 wt%. The other, centered at around 358C, wasascribed to the glass transition of the hard segment. It

became weaker and weaker and eventually vanished with

the increase of diolPOSS content. From the synthesis

route in Scheme 1, it should be noted that the diolPOSS

cages were grafted onto the hard segments of the macro-

molecular chains, so they played a greater negative role

in the motion of hard segmental chain than that of the

soft segmental chain.

Thermal Stability

TGA was used to evaluate the thermal stability of the

pristine PU and PU hybrids containing diolPOSS. As

shown in Fig. 6a, all samples displayed similar degrada-

tion profiles, suggesting that the existence of diolPOSS

component did not significantly alter the degradation

mechanism of the polymer matrix. The decomposition

process of all samples in inert atmosphere ran mainly in

two steps, and this result can be observed more obviously

in the derivatives of the TGA curves as a function of tem-

perature (shown in Fig. 6b). The temperature for the first

maximum rate of weight loss, which can be connected

with the degradation of the hard segments of PU [20],

was located at ca. 3508C for the pristine PU, whereas this

temperature for PU hybrids slightly decreased. The sec-

ond maximum weight loss, attributed to the degradation

of soft segments of PU, was situated at ca. 4008C, and it

shifted to higher temperature on the addition of diolPOSS.

With increasing diolPOSS loading, the inorganic ingredi-

ent enhanced, resulting in a higher char yields as

expected. For example, at 6008C, there was about 2.7

wt% residue for the pristine PU and about 4.7 wt% resi-

due for the PU hybrids containing 10 wt% diolPOSS. The

increase in char yields implied that there were fewer vola-

tiles being released from the hybrids at high temperature.

During the decomposition process of PU hybrids, once

the hard segments started to decompose, the bulk materi-

FIG. 5. The dynamic mechanical spectra of the pristine PU and PU–

diolPOSS hybrids, (a) storage modulus (G0) vs. temperature and (b) loss

tangent (tand) vs. temperature.

800 POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2011 DOI 10.1002/pen

Page 7: Thermomechanical and surface properties of novel poly(ether urethane)/polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane nanohybrid elastomers

als were covered with ceramic residue composed of silica,

resulting in a drop of the rate of volatiles’ release from

the materials and leading to an improvement of the ther-

mal stability at high temperature as well. On the basis of

the above results, it is estimated that the thermal stability

of hybrids was not significantly enhanced with the inor-

ganic component tethered into the PU macromolecular

chains [16, 17, 33].

Surface Properties

It is widely known that organosilicon compounds are

generally of low surface energy. In the present case,

the diolPOSS cages were covalently connected with PU

chains. The surface properties of the PU hybrids were

investigated in terms of the measurements of static con-

tact angles against water and diiodomethane. The results

are summarized in Table 2. The contact angle of the

pristine PU was approximately 978 measured with

water. On diolPOSS added to the system, the contact

angle increased with the percentage of diolPOSS rising

and reached up to 114.58 for the PU hybrid containing

10 wt% diolPOSS. This observation indicated that the

hydrophobicity of the materials was significantly

enhanced; that is, the surface free energy of the materi-

als was reduced. The surface free energies of the

hybrids containing various percentages of diolPOSS

were calculated according to the geometric mean model

[34, 35]:

gL 1þ cos yð Þ ¼ 2 gDS gDL

� �12

h iþ 2 gPSg

PL

� �12

h i(1)

gS ¼ gDS þ gPS (2)

where y is contact angle, and gL is the liquid surface

tension; gPL and gDL are the polar and dispersive compo-

nents of gL, respectively. The calculated surface free

energies of the hybrids were also presented in Table 2.

It should be noted that the total surface free energies

of the hybrids were reduced from 36.5 to 18.5 mN�malong with the increasing of diolPOSS content. To

minimize the polymer–air surface tension, the material

with a lower surface energy is located at the surface

[36, 37]. Therefore, there may exist a thermodynamic

driving force for the migration of diolPOSS to the free

surface.

To verify this possibility, the surface elemental compo-

sitions of the PU hybrids were investigated by means of

FIG. 6. TGA measurements for the pristine PU and PU–diolPOSS

hybrids at 208C/min heating rate under a nitrogen atmosphere, (a) TGA

curves and (b) derivative TGA curves.

TABLE 2. Static contact angles and surface free energies of the

pristine PU and diolPOSS-containing PU hybrids.

Samples hH2Oo � rð Þ hCH2I2

o � rð Þ cDS

mN�m�1

cPS

mN�m�1

cS

mN�m�1

PU0 97.0 6 2.3 47.0 6 1.8 36.20 0.29 36.49

PU2 104.3 6 0.6 58.2 6 2.6 30.46 0.05 30.51

PU5 109.4 6 2.7 72.4 6 1.8 21.85 0.12 21.97

PU8 113.5 6 2.1 77.1 6 1.0 19.57 0.03 19.60

PU10 114.5 6 1.6 79.1 6 2.1 18.49 0.03 18.52

FIG. 7. XPS survey spectrum of the PU hybrid containing 5 wt%

diolPOSS.

DOI 10.1002/pen POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2011 801

Page 8: Thermomechanical and surface properties of novel poly(ether urethane)/polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane nanohybrid elastomers

XPS. Figure 7 shows a representative XPS spectrum of

the thin hybrid film containing 5 wt% diolPOSS. The C

1s peak centered at 284.6 eV is responsible for the contri-

bution of several types of carbon atom from the PU and

diolPOSS components. The oxygen atoms present in the

urethane, which were chemically bonded to carbon atoms,

are detected at the peak of a higher binding energy. The

O 1s peak at approximately 532.0 eV is mainly ascribed

to the C��O, C¼¼O of the urethane and a bit to the oxy-

gen present in the diolPOSS cages. The Si atoms from

the silsesquioxane moiety of diolPOSS contributed the Si

2s and Si 2p signals at 153.2 and 103.6 eV, respectively.

The N 1s peak occurred at 400.5 eV corresponding to the

amide group of the urethane. The relative concentrations

of C, O, N, and Si on the surfaces of the PU hybrids, cal-

culated from the corresponding photoelectron peak areas,

are listed in Table 3. It is obvious that carbon and oxygen

were dominant on the detected surfaces of all samples.

The concentrations of elemental Si increased with the dio-

lPOSS content going up in the PU hybrids, and it is espe-

cially noteworthy that its experimental concentrations on

the surface of the hybrids were significantly higher than

its theoretical vales calculated in terms of the feed ratio.

For instance, the surface content of Si is 5.08 mol% when

the concentration of diolPOSS is 5 wt%. This value is

much higher than the theoretical value 0.42 mol%. This

observation suggests that there existed the enrichment of

a Si-containing moiety on the surface of the hybrids [38,

39]. This result helps us to understand the enhancement

of the surface hydrophobicity for the POSS-modified

polymer composites.

CONCLUSIONS

A series of linear poly(ether urethane)–diolPOSS

hybrid elastomers were synthesized using two organic sol-

vents as dispersing agent for the reactant monomers. DSC

results showed that the soft segment chains of the hybrids

displayed increased glass transition temperature in com-

parison with the pristine PU, resulting from the strong

POSS–PU and POSS–POSS interaction. According to

DMA results, it can be seen that the addition of diolPOSS

enhanced the storage modulus of the rubbery state and

caused various degrees of confinement to the soft and

hard segmental chain motions. In terms of TGA, the ther-

mal stability of the hybrids had a limited enhancement,

as evidenced by the rate of volatiles’ release from the

materials and the increased char yields. Contact angle

measurements indicated that the hydrophobicity of the

hybrids was significantly enhanced while the surface

free energy reduced, with regard to the enrichment of the

diolPOSS moiety on the surface of the hybrids, which

was evidenced by XPS.

REFERENCES

1. Y.W. Chen-Yang, Y.K. Lee, Y.T. Chen, and J.C. Wu, Poly-mer, 48, 2969 (2007).

2. D.W. Scott, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 68, 356 (1946).

3. Y.Q. Zhao and D.A. Schiraldi, Polymer, 46, 11640 (2005).

4. F.C.L. Ciolacu, N.R. Choudhury, N. Dutta, and E. Kosior,

Macromolecules, 40, 265 (2007).

5. E. Markovic, S. Clarke, J. Matisons, and G.P. Simon, Mac-romolecules, 41, 1685 (2008).

6. J. Wu, T.S. Haddad, and P.T. Mather, Macromolecules, 42,1142 (2009).

7. J.D. Lichtenhan, N.Q. Vu, J.A. Carter, J.W. Gilman, and

F.J. Feher, Macromolecules, 26, 2141 (1993).

8. A. Fina, H.C.L. Abbenhuis, D. Tabuani, and G. Camino,

Polym. Degrad. Stab., 91, 2275 (2006).

9. S.L. Cooper and A.V. Tobolsky, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 10,1837 (1966).

10. B.M. Walkor and C.P. Rader, Handbook of Thermo-plastic Elastomer, Van Nostrand Reinfold, New York

(1988).

11. S. Turri and M. Levi, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 26, 1233(2005).

12. S. Turri and M. Levi, Macromolecules, 38, 5569 (2005).

13. A.K. Nanda, D.A. Wicks, S.A. Madbouly, and J.U. Otaigbe,

Macromolecules, 39, 7037 (2006).

14. S.A. Madbouly, J.U. Otaigbe, A.K. Nanda, and D.A. Wicks,

Macromolecules, 40, 4982 (2007).

15. D. Neumann, M. Fisher, L. Tran, and J.G. Matisons, J. Am.Chem. Soc., 124, 13998 (2002).

16. H.Z. Liu and S.X. Zheng, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 26,196 (2005).

17. Y.H. Liu, Y. Ni, and S.X. Zheng, Macromol. Chem. Phys.,207, 1842 (2006).

18. B.X. Fu, B.S. Hsiao, H. White, M. Rafailovich, P.T. Mather,

H.G. Jeon, S. Phillips, J. Lichtenhan, and J. Schwab, Polym.Int., 49, 437 (2000).

19. B.X. Fu, B.S. Hsiao, S. Pagola, P. Stephens, H. White,

M. Rafailovich, J. Sokolov, P.T. Mather, H.G. Jeon, S.

Phillips, J. Lichtenhan, and J. Schwab, Polymer, 42, 599

(2001).

20. B. Janowski and K. Pielichowski, Thermochim. Acta., 478,51 (2008).

21. M. Oaten and N.R. Choudhury, Macromolecules, 38, 6392(2005).

22. A.K. Nanda and D.A. Wicks, Polymer, 47, 1805 (2006).

23. A.J. Waddon and E.B. Coughlin, Chem. Mater., 15, 4555

(2003).

TABLE 3. The elemental compositions of the surfaces of diolPOSS-

containing PU hybrids determined by means of XPS.

Samples

Experimental composition

(mol%)

Theoretical composition

(mol%)

C O Si N C O Si N

PU2 72.36 21.19 4.90 1.54 77.94 20.32 0.17 1.56

PU5 72.71 20.49 5.08 1.73 77.65 20.28 0.42 1.64

PU8 73.81 19.01 5.29 1.90 77.36 20.23 0.68 1.73

PU10 71.89 20.56 5.65 1.90 77.14 20.22 0.86 1.78

802 POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2011 DOI 10.1002/pen

Page 9: Thermomechanical and surface properties of novel poly(ether urethane)/polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane nanohybrid elastomers

24. J. Wu, T.S. Haddad, G.M. Kim, and P.T. Mather, Macromo-lecules, 40, 544 (2007).

25. A. Lee and J.D. Lichtenhan, Macromolecules, 31, 4970

(1998).

26. A. Lee and J.D. Lichtenhan, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 73, 1993(1999).

27. L. Liu and W.P. Wang, Polym. Bull., 62, 315 (2009).

28. H.X. Zhang, H.Y. Lee, Y.J. Shin, K.B. Yoon, S.K. Noh, and

D.H. Lee, Polym. Int., 57, 1351 (2008).

29. P.T. Mather, H.G. Jeon, A. Romo-Uribe, T.S. Haddad, and

J.D. Lichtenhan, Macromolecules, 32, 1194 (1999).

30. H.Y. Xu, S.W. Kuo, J.S. Lee, and F.C. Chang, Macromole-cules, 35, 8788 (2002).

31. B.H. Yang, H.Y. Xu, J.F. Wang, S.Y. Gang, and C. Li, J.Appl. Polym. Sci., 106, 320 (2007).

32. D. Bikiaris, J. Prinos, M. Botev, C. Betchev, and C. Pan-

ayiotou, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 93, 726 (2004).

33. J. Choi, S.G. Kim, and R.M. Laine, Macromolecules, 37, 99(2004).

34. D.H. Kaelble and K.C. Uy, J Adhes., 2, 50 (1970).

35. D.H. Kaelble, Physical Chemistry of Adhesion, Wiley

Online Library, New York (1971).

36. Y.M. Yuan and M.S. Shoichet, Macromolecules, 33, 4926(2000).

37. H. Lee and L.A. Archer, Macromolecules, 34, 4572 (2001).

38. K. Zeng and S.X. Zheng, J. Phys. Chem. B, 111, 13919

(2007).

39. K. Koh, S. Sugiyama, T. Morinaga, K. Ohno, Y. Tsujii, T.

Fukuda, M. Yamahiro, T. Iijima, H. Oikawa, K. Watanabe,

and T. Miyashita, Macromolecules, 38, 1264 (2005).

DOI 10.1002/pen POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE—-2011 803


Top Related