The Tools: from Diagnostic to
Implementation
Virginia Tanase
Coherence and consistencyA
PoA Aims
(a) secure access to and from the sea by all means of transport according to applicable rules of international law; (b) reduce costs and improve services so as to increase the competitiveness of their exports; (c) reduce the delivered costs of imports; (d) address problems of delays and uncertainties in trade routes; (e) develop adequate national networks; (f) reduce loss, damage and deterioration en route; (g) open the way for export expansion; (h) improve safety of road transport and security of people along the corridors.
WB
Tra
nspo
rt S
trat
egy Strategic directions
1. Create the conditions for increased support for transport investment and governance2. Deepen engagement in the roads and highways subsector3. Increase engagement in the urban transport subsector4. Diversify engagement in transport for trade- support public and private infrastructure investment to overcome physical or quality bottlenecks in transport so as to enable regional and international trade in goods and services- increased attention to transport services - develop the institutional capacity to implement transport and logistics strategies- corridor approaches used in designing the strategies for major trade routes5. Transport and climate change: control emissions and mitigate impactW
B T
rade
Str
ateg
y Priority areas
1. Trade Competitiveness and Diversification- trade policy ; trade in services as a new means to access international best practices and expand exports; and the design and implementation of specific actions to address market and information failures2. Trade Facilitation, Transport Logistics and Trade Finance- to reduce the costs associated with moving goods along international supply chains, whether these are measured in terms of time, money, or reliability- to enhance the performance of trade corridors used by land-linked developing countries, especially in Africa3. Support for Market Access and International Trade Cooperation4:Managing Shocks and Promoting Greater Inclusion
Road Transport is the dominant mode of transport in overland trade…
• There are significant prospects to reduce trade costs by improving the efficiency of road transport operations
• Most regional road transport markets, outside the EU, are not fully liberalized
• However, most effort goes into building roads rather than undertaking reforms in road transport services
Improved road
condition
Reduce vehicle
operating costs
Reduced transport
prices
Growth, trade and poverty
reduction
The assumption: Roads, Transport Services and Trade
4
Infrastructure Services Services users
Source: Raballand, 2013
1 2 3
International road transport services
• THE victim of market access restrictions, for various reasons:– to penalize the lack of
harmonization of technical standards/parameters
– to protect national carriers– for political reasons– because of bad enforcement
International road transport services
• Multilateral legal instruments (if any) set just the framework, minimal standards, acceptable to all
• Bilateral agreements are still the predominant barrier or tool for facilitation, even in high regional integration areas
Need more focus on road transport services …
• Developing and advocating for regional transport infrastructure
– World Bank invested close to USD14 billion from 1970-2007 in Africa (mostly on corridors)
• But …– Prices are still high in most
regions especially in Africa…
23.5 4
5 5 57
8
11
02468
101214
Paki
stan
Braz
il
US
A
Chi
na
Wes
tern
Euro
pe –
long
dist
ance
Afric
a-D
urba
n-Lu
saka
Afric
a- L
omé
-O
uaga
doug
ou
Afric
a –
Mom
basa
Kam
pala
Afric
a-D
oual
a-N
djam
éna
Ave
rage
tran
spor
t pric
es
(in U
S c
ents
per
tkm
)
• Worth remembering …– Regulation was originally intended to
protect rail traffic and incumbents• But failed in
– Regulating capacity and– Preventing the erosion of rail
transport• Quantity regulation largely
dismantled in developed countries
Bilateral agreements are the instrument of choice ..
• Bilateral agreements are the favored instrument of regulatory control
• There are multitudes of bilateral agreements.
– ECMT in 2002 found around 1,400 bilateral agreements between 43 European countries. Bilateral road transport agreements account for more than 95 percent of road transport operations between EU states and third countries.
– For operators, keeping track of all the agreements can be a significant regulatory burden.
• There is often unequal treatment of operators based on their country of registration.
– Reciprocity and territoriality are key principles in bilaterals
• Yet restrictions are often embedded in such agreements
• Liberalization of transport services can have a significant impact on supply and prices e.g. Laos - Thailand
20002001
20022003
20042005
20062007
20110
20406080
100120140
Agreements are not always concluded for pure transport purposes
• There are two main types of reasons for bilateral road transport agreements:– Economic
• To carry trade exchanges in an equitable manner • To send a signal to markets and develop demand. • In case of large investments performed in infrastructure, to
promote its use, including the development of ancillary activities. • To detail the implementation of broader commitments assumed by
the two parties in international multilateral legal instruments. – Political
• agreement s are used as a starting point to develop or improve the relations between the two countries.
• an economic (partial) solution to a political problem.
What World Bank projects told us
• Lack of traffic and transit rights (loading / unloading at borders)
• Different technical standards between neighboring countries, abusive roadside checks
• Market restrictions• Imposed cargo sharing/tour de rôle• Discrimination on grounds of goods’ origin, vehicle
plates etc• Low level of regional integration• Absence of multilateral agreements or poor
enforcement
What the bilateral agreements told us• Some of the bilateral agreements are quite old
– Often poorly enforced and at same time may lack modern provisions thereby perpetuating unsustainable practices.
• Restrictive bilateral agreements can introduce market distortions and increase costs. – Where bilateral agreements are based on a quota system, the
common practice is to fix the number of permits at the same level for both parties. Ignores potential for supply response.
• All the above lead to:– fragmented supply chains; high costs, transit times, and
uncertainty in cargo flows. – Operators finding it difficult to comply with requirements in
different markets, and a company’s efficient operations in one country may not create positive spillover effects in another country.
The approach …• 4-step process:
– Develop an analytical template and use it to generate an index of openness of cross-border road transport markets.
– Select benchmarks to compare the relative openness of each agreement.
– Select agreements to review.– Conduct a statistical analysis to
assess the relationship between demand for road transport services and the openness of the bilateral agreements between pairs of countries.
• Identified 11 core features:i. limitations of the scope of the agreement ii. transport authorization requirements
and complexities/restrictions of transport permit management
iii. list of types of traffic exempted from permit requirements
iv. list of types of traffic exempted from quota requirements
v. cabotage traffic limitations vi. transit quota limitations vii. third-country traffic limitations viii. prescribed routes and border crossing
points ix. taxation-related limitations x. facilitation measures (driver, vehicle,
cargo) in place xi. transparency requirements.
Agre
emen
ts
revi
ewed
Geographic relation Number of selected bilateral agreements % of total
Europe-Europe 18 23
Asia-Europe 29 38
Africa-Europe 13 17
Asia-Asia 9 12
Africa-Africa 7 9
South America 1 1
TOTAL 77 100
Geographic region
Multilateral agreement Number of countries
Europe (including Caucasus)
Recommended Model Bilateral Agreement on Road Transport between ECMT member countries
45a
South-East European Cooperation Initiative (SECI) Memorandum of Understanding on the Facilitation of International Road Transport of Goods
10
Black Sea Region Memorandum of Understanding on Facilitation of Road Transport of Goods in the BSEC Region; Black Sea Economic Cooperation (BSEC); Agreement on Multilateral Transit Permits
7
Asia (South-East Asia)
Agreement between and among the Governments of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic, the Kingdom of Thailand, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam for Facilitation of Cross-border Transport of Goods and People (CBTA—Cross Border Transport Agreement)
3
Africa Memorandum of Understanding on Road Transportation in the Common Customs Area pursuant to the Customs Union Agreement between the Governments of Botswana, Lesotho, South Africa, and Swaziland
5
SATCC Model Bilateral Agreement on the Regulation of Cross-Border Freight Road Transport
15
Tripartite Agreement on Road Transport Uganda—Kenya—Tanzania 3
South America ALADI Agreement on International Land Transport 7
Mul
tilat
eral
ag
reem
ents
Maximizing benefits for countries
• Start negotiation only when all stakeholders have agreed on the mandate- this will ensure support in implementation!
• Include core elements in any bilateral road transport agreement
• Emphasize qualitative over quantitative and multilateral over bilateral regulation
• Adopt the principle of freedoms
Maximizing benefits for countries (1)
• Harmonize and simplify technical requirements
• Set harmonized and transparent rules for cross-cutting issues
• Nurture effective institutional and implementation arrangements
• Conform with major international obligations
Conclusion• Lack of consistency and transparency in
bilateral agreements reduces efficiency and increases cost of international road transport services
• A comprehensive approach including a model-agreement to reform the regulation of international road transport services is needed
Appeal
Please kindly share with us your bilateral agreements so that we can
continue this important work! Thank you!
