Download - SONA TM JNC
State of the National Association Talent Management | Learning and Development
Principles to follow: ✓ Be wary of intellectual arrogance ✓ Have you heard of growth mindset?
WARNING Talent Management | Learning and Development
Late Submissions:
• Thapar • Chandigarh • Hyderabad • Lucknow
• Jaipur • Dehradun • Delhi IIT
Not Submitted/ Incomplete
• Baroda • Surat
• Mumbai • Jodhpur
MC Update Associate Membership:
2 1 0 T M P
A s s o c i a t e M e m b e r s h i p ,
p r o d u c e d
1 1 0 o G C D P
A s s o c i a t e M e m b e r s h i p ,
p r o d u c e d
But is it all worth it?
ANALYSIS FOCUSING
ON 5 MOS FOR TALENT
MEMBER RETENTION
% OF TMP THAT IS PRODUCTIVE
AVERAGE PRODUCTIVITY
ACHIEVEMENT OF TEAM MINIMUMS
% OF VALID PEOPLE ANALYTICS
1 3 0 0 T M P
I n M a r c h a n d A p r i l ,
A I E S E C I n d i a r e c r u i t e d
8 0 0 p i p e l i n e
a n d w e h a d
MEMBER RETENTION
1 3 0 0 T M P
I n M a r c h a n d A p r i l ,
A I E S E C I n d i a r e c r u i t e d
8 0 0 p i p e l i n e
a n d w e h a d N o w ,
A I E S E C I n d i a h a s 1 5 6 2
T M P
MEMBER RETENTION
5 3 9
W e l o s t
m e m b e r s i n 2 m o n t h s .
MEMBER RETENTION
oGCDP Newie Retention Rate
7 0 % u n d e r
7 5 % u n d e r
5 9 % u n d e r
6 9 % u n d e r
iGCDP Newie Retention Rate
oGIP Newie Retention Rate iGIP Newie Retention Rate
MEMBER RETENTION
MEMBER RETENTION
“Is this even accurate?”
5 3 9 W H Y ?
MEMBER RETENTION
“How can we ensure that we increase our retention rate?” “How can we ensure this data is accurate?”
% OF VALID PEOPLE ANALYTICS
0
60
120
180
240
300
JNC Audit May Audit Team Member Program Statistics on the system
“How can we ensure that we increase our retention rate?”
G E T K E E P C O N T R I B U T E
MEMBER RETENTION
“How can we ensure that we increase our retention rate?”
A R E W E R E C R U I T I N G T H E R I G H T P E O P L E ?
A R E W E F U L F I L L I N G T E A M M I N I M U M S ?
A R E O U R M E M B E R S P R O D U C T I V E ?
MEMBER RETENTION
AVERAGE PRODUCTIVITY
1 5 6 2
I G C D P 3 0 3
I G I P 2 4 0
O G C D P 2 6 9
O G I P 1 2 2 A R E O U R
M E M B E R S P R O D U C T I V E ?
AVERAGE PRODUCTIVITY
1 5 6 2
I G C D P 3 0 3
I G I P 2 4 0
O G C D P 2 6 9
O G I P 1 2 2
2180 RA 3.64
A R E O U R M E M B E R S
P R O D U C T I V E ?
2 1 8 0 R A
1 1 0 5 M A
6 2 7 R A 3 0 4 M A 1.26
7 5 3 R A 7 5 7 M A 2.79
1 5 5 R A 5 3 M A 0.43
AVERAGE PRODUCTIVITY
1 . 4 6
A R E O U R M E M B E R S
P R O D U C T I V E ?
4
O u t o f 1 5 6 2 T M P ,
9 3 7 T M P
a r e n o t -p e r f o r m i n g .
6 2 5 p e r f o r m i n g
a n d w e h a v e
% OF TMP THAT IS PRODUCTIVE
A R E O U R M E M B E R S
P R O D U C T I V E ?
of iGCDP is not performing
of oGCDP is not performing
% OF TMP THAT IS PRODUCTIVE
A R E O U R M E M B E R S
P R O D U C T I V E ?
of iGIP is not performing
of oGIP is not performing
% OF TMP THAT IS PRODUCTIVE
A R E O U R M E M B E R S
P R O D U C T I V E ?
% OF TMP THAT IS PRODUCTIVE
What is the hindering our productivity?
The problem is not with increasing productivity, it’s about making more people
productive.
How should you calculate the productivity of back office?
A R E O U R M E M B E R S
P R O D U C T I V E ?
ACHIEVEMENT OF TEAM MINIMUMS
3 0 % O F T H E T E A M S I N
A I E S E C I N D I A H A V E A T E A M
P U R P O S E
1 4 % O F T E A M L E A D E R S G I V E
M O N T H L Y C O A C H I N G C H A T S
8 % O F O F T E A M S H A V E R E F L E C T I O N
A R E W E F U L F I L L I N G
T E A M M I N I M U M S
T E A M M I N I M U M S
1
2
5 3 7
6
Team
Plan
JD
Training
4
Tracking & Coaching
Evaluation
Reflection
85% 0 14% 8%
54% 60% 45%
ACHIEVEMENT OF TEAM MINIMUMS
A I E S E C I N D I A D O E N ’ T H A V E
P R O P E R J D S F O R A N Y O N E
% OF VALID PEOPLE ANALYTICS
No LC’s submitted accurate Talent Management data during Audits
ANALYSIS FOCUSING
ON 5 MOS FOR TALENT
MEMBER RETENTION
% OF TMP THAT IS PRODUCTIVE
AVERAGE PRODUCTIVITY
ACHIEVEMENT OF TEAM MINIMUMS
% OF VALID PEOPLE ANALYTICS
Parameters:
MEMBER RETENTION
% OF TMP THAT IS PRODUCTIVE
AVERAGE PRODUCTIVITY
ACHIEVEMENT OF TEAM MINIMUMS
% OF VALID PEOPLE ANALYTICS
SUSTAINABILITY FACTORS: % of seniors
VPTM PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
LC STANDINGS 5 MOS
FOR TALENT
% OF VALID PEOPLE ANALYTICS
K O L K A T A
D E H R A D U N
H Y D E R A B A D
Top performers in Yellow
D E L H I U N I V E R S I T Y
L E A D P R O C E S S I S H A P H A Z A R D A C R O S S
C O M M I S S I O N N O T R A I N I N G S K I L L S
I N A N Y L C T R A I N I N G S C H E D U L E S
N O T A L I G N E D T O E X C H A N G E P E A K
LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT
L E A D L E A R N I N G
5 3 9
W e l o s t
m e m b e r s i n 2 m o n t h s .
5 9 % u n d e r
O G I P 1 2 2 1 5 5 R A 5 3 M A 0.43
5 5 % o v e r
3 0 % O F T H E T E A M S I N
A I E S E C I N D I A H A V E A T E A M
P U R P O S E
T A 1 E N T
E V E R Y M E M B E R I S I M P O R T A N T
E V E R Y M E M B E R M A T T E R S
T A 1 E N T
E V E R Y M E M B E R I S I M P O R T A N T
E V E R Y M E M B E R M A T T E R S