Preserving History, Culture and Community
Cultural and Historical Preservation Team Proposals
Photo: J Blough
The neighborhood we know as Chinatown began in 1643. Two farm lots extending from Baxter Street past Chatham Square, on either side of a double wagon road -- today’s Bowery -- were given to Domingo Antony and Catelina, widow of Jochem Antony, free Africans. The neighborhood soon became New York’s first African village, the Bouwerij Village.
The Bowery ca. 1750, site of Domingo’s farm at the left, Catelina’s at the right.
In the 19th century, it was known as Five Points, the home of German, Irish, Italian and Jewish immigrants. To house and rent the immigrant refugees, landowners created the first multiple dwelling: the tenement.
These soon became the tallest buildings in New York, the skyscrapers of the day; only church steeples were taller.
Five Points, ca. 1850
At first, tenements were simple like most townhouses and early American architecture.
- 65 Mott Street - oldest tenement
in New York7 stories, c.1820
During the
1860’s and ‘70’s, tenements
followed the English fashion
for Italianate ornaments.
-Eldridge Street -ca. 1865
By the 1880’s, tenements were elaborate and ornamented,
ranging in style from the classical,
Palladian and distinguished
- 66 Bayard -
to the fanciful and unrestrained, covered with terra cotta and multiple architectural
materials:
-162 Henry Street -Renaissance Revival
Herter Bros., Architect
stone,
concrete,
terra cotta,
molded and delicately tinted brick.
…frequently with Italian Renaissance models, but sometimes with Nordic, Wagnerian themes
-86 Madison Street -Eclectic
Rundbogenstil
During the ‘City Beautiful Movement’
-- and after a sweeping housing reform law in
1901 --
tenements expanded in scale and grandeur.
- 253 Grand Street at Chrystie -Beaux Arts - Art Nouveau
New Law tenement
Most of CD1 and CD2 are protected and preserved by special zoning or landmark districting.
New S. Vill
Here are the special zonings(the four zones in CD3 are projected 2nd Avenue subway stations, not preservation zones)
and historic districts in whitethe South Village District proposal (black outline) has been partially designated
New South Village
District
Community District 3 - the Lower East Side - has only one preservation area, Stuyvesant Street
CD3
CD2
CD1
New South Village Hist Dist
Second Avenue subway
Second Avenue subway
Second Avenue subway
Community Districts 1 and 2 are almost entirely protectedwith landmarking and special zoning.
Here’s an example of our spreadsheet from our walk-through
This is one sheet from our Chrystie Street walk-through
and a detailed description of the façade.
whether the building would not contribute to a historic district
We divided this “greater Chinatown” into four areas:Five Points ChinatownTwo Bridges Chinatown expansionLower East Side Chinatown expansion Little Italy Chinatown expansion
LowerEastSide
Little Italy
Five Points
Two Bridges
Also, the Team includes the
CAPZ-Bowery Alliance of Neighbors
preservation plan for the east side of
the Bowery.
(The west side of Bowery is already protected in the
Special Little Italy District and the NoHo Historic
Districts) Five Points
LowerEastSide
Two Bridges
Bowery East
CAPZ-BAN
For the other four areas we propose these preservation tools:
contextual zoningspecial purpose zoning landmark districting
The Team proposes that, to
preserve the history and character of
Chinatown and its community, all four districts
be designated as one or more
New York Historic
District,
except
Division Street and East
Broadway.
Historic District
AndSpecial Purpose Zoning
Historic District and Special Purpose
Zoning
Excluded from landmark district
There are at least three distinct historic districts, Five Points, the Lower East Side Chinatown and Two Bridges.
CB3CD3
CD3
CD2
LESChinatown
5 Points
Two Bridges
The Bowery
The Team also proposes that all three districts be designated Special Purpose Districts by the City Planning Commission to encourage local community businesses and preserve the local character and vitality. The Team proposes the following principles:
Aspects to preserve:Scale -- heights (height caps)Scale -- bulk (FAR limits)Lots -- (prohibit combining storefront lots or big box chains)Street patterns (e.g., Doyers' bend)Masonry (brick)Contextual fenestrationContextual projecting decorative cornicesContextual window surrounds (often stone)Contextual entryways (often stone)Contextual decorative façades (stone, brick, terra cotta)Fire escapesEarly 20th century signs in Chinese charactersContemporary projecting signs
We identified several consequences of a Landmarking:
Property rights (air rights/development rights) are preserved for the owners
Air rights can be transferred further to violate the context nearby
Alterations require LPC permission, an inconvenience for ground floor commerce
Street use and commercial use are not restricted
Buildings are positively protected
The context is positively protected (new buildings in a landmark district must pass through LPC)
Protections inconvenience developers
New signs are usually required to conform with either current styles or historic styles
New repairs or renovations may have to conform to historic models
LPC does not require renovation or restoration
LPC offers financial assistance for some repairs and restoration
Landmarks Conservancy offers financial assistance for maintenance
Also, we identified several consequences of a Special Zoning:
Property rights (air rights/development rights) may be lost to owners
Air rights are severely restricted or obviated, protecting the context
Height caps cannot be modulated to buildings that are lower than the 85% compliance DCP usually requires
Street use, commercial use, future development all may be restricted
Alterations may require only at most DoB permission
Development disincentive helps to protect buildings (though not positively protected)
Disincentive to develop helps to protect the context (though not positively protected)
Protections inconvenience developers.
Finally, we considered their conjunction:
Landmarked air rights may be lost
Aggregation of air rights may be prevented
Buildings are positively protected
Streets and uses positively protected
If one application (landmarks or special zoning) is rejected, the other may still succeed -- so applying both should be considered and considered as if they might be approved alone (e.g., with special consideration for what happens under each tactic).
To facilitate both these preservation tools, the Team proposes that
a Historic Trust Fund be created for Chinatown,
administered by a Chinatown Conservancy.
A Chinatown Conservancy and Historic Trust Fund would assist owners and tenants of historic
properties with compliance issues. This entity could be financed with
assessments on new construction and development in the planning area.
The City also uses contextual rezonings -- zones that preserve the context of a neighborhood by limiting bulk and height and the street wall of new buildings.
So the Cultural and Preservation Team proposes contextual zonings for each of the three areas.
The current zone encourages out-of-scale hotel development at the expense of housing, and threatens eviction for demolitions and redevelopment.
• Current zone: C6-1• FAR 6 commercial• FAR 6.5 community facility• FAR 3.44 residential
Current zoning does not allow large residential buildings, but does allow large hotels. So current zoning encourages many more big hotels, like Hotel Mulberry -- --replacing residents:
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Current zoning allows even larger dormitories
The East Village/LES rezoning prevents any further community destruction from out-of-scale dormitories in the residential blocks of the Lower East Side.
Delancey Street
Today, Five Points buildings still have an average FAR of only 4.2, and 90% of the buildings are lower than 75 feet tall.
The Team proposes that Five Points should be rezoned exactly as the Lower East Side was rezoned, to prevent out-of-scale hotels and dormitories.
In Five Points-Chinatown, identical rezoning from C6-1 to C4-4A will prevent out-of-scale development and will allow underbuilt structures to
be expanded or redeveloped for housing.
For Two Bridges Chinatown, the Team proposes an R8B zone for residential Henry, Madison and Monroe; C4-4A on
commercial Division and East Broadway
C4-4A: FAR 4 80 foot height caps
R8B: FAR 4 75 foot height caps
C4-4A
R8B
Currently, Two Bridges-Chinatown is divided into three zones:•
Division and East Broadway to Pike: C6-1Gcommercial FAR 6residential FAR 3.44community facility 6.5no height limits
Henry, Madison, Monroe: R7-2residential FAR 3.44community facility FAR 6.5no height limits
Pike to Rutgers, Division to East Broadway: C6-2Commercial FAR 6Community facility FAR 6.5Residential up to 6.02No height limits
C6-1G
C6-2
R7-2
R7-2
FAR 6 for hotels,
6.5 FAR for dormitories,
and unlimited heights.Madison Street at Pike, 12 stories
Most buildings in Two Bridges Chinatown are less than 70 feet tall, FAR 3.5, yet the current zoning allows
The C6-1G zone carries all the dangers of out-of-scale hotel development as C6-1.
Rezoning to C4-4A / R8B would be consistent with the Lower East Side rezoning and will protect the neighborhood from out-of-scale hotel development while allow for new housing in soft sites.
C4-4A
R8B
For the Lower East Side Chinatown area, the Team proposes a C4-4A zone, exactly the same
zone as the recent LES protective rezoning.
CB3CD3
CD3
CD2
LES/ Chinatown
Part of the LES area was already rezoned as C4-4A to protect the
neighborhood from out-of-scale hotel development.
The areas that were not rezoned have no protection
unless they are rezoned now
The Team proposes to extend the recent LES rezoning to the LES area of Chinatown so that out-of-scale hotels do not move into the Chinatown neighborhood displacing the local community.
Tenement Museum Historic District(CB3
approved)
LES Chinatown
In the recent LES rezoning, the City Planning Commission upzoned Chrystie Street to C6-3A, which allows FAR 7.52 and 145' heights.
During the rezoning process, CB3 passed a resolution objecting to the upzoning, which they felt was excessive.
At Community Board 3, it was suggested that a proposal to rezone Chrystie Street would give the community an opportunity to revisit that upzoning.
The current zoning on east Bowery is C6-1 and C6-1G, with no height caps.
The East Bowery Plan does not propose any change in the zoning designation, except adding height caps of at 85 feet, or eight stories, conforming to the west side of the Bowery.
The Bowery Plan also proposes protections for buildings of special significance.
* Preserve low-rise historic context of the entire Bowery * Preserve Bowery’s low-rise context in relation to adjacent historic Chinatown, Little Italy, NoHo, East Village, and Lower East Side * Prevent out-of-scale, out-of-context developments * Protect low-rise buildings of special significance * Allow controlled, responsible development, including community facilities, while maintaining low-rise character * Promote retention of mixed socio-economic populations, affordable housing, social services & artists’ live/work spaces * Protect small businesses, including long-established lighting, jewelry, and restaurant supply districts
East Bowery Preservation Plan Goals
These proposals were conceived as goals and principles, not demands. They are intended to offer a guide -- if the CWG endorses them -- for a planning consultant.
The narrow scope of the boundaries were limited by the CWG decision to plan for “Chinatown and surrounding neighborhoods” and the participation of local constituencies.
Three remaining unresolved comments from the August presentation:
1. Review Canal Street west of Baxter and consider keeping it in the Chinatown map.
2. Consider the new city plan to require individual permits for hotels.
3. Work with the Economic Team to locate affordable housing bonus areas and consider their scale and context.
Addendum