Transcript
Page 1: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Mendon-Upton Regional Mendon-Upton Regional SchoolsSchools

2013 MCAS Results &Accountability Status

Presentation to the Mendon-Upton Regional School

CommitteeOctober 21, 2013

Page 2: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Purpose of Presentation

Provide a broad overview of MCAS performance of the district in relationship to the State in ELA, Math, and Science

Provide a context for MCAS results by examining similar districts’ performance

Clarify the state’s accountability system model

Identify areas that pose a challenge and plans to address those challenges

Page 3: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Strengths

District Math scores improved 5% from 2012 to 2013

District ELA scores improved 3% from 2012 to 2013

Grade 3 ELA scores improved 7 % from 2012 to 2013

Grade 3 Math scores improved 15% from 2012 to 2013

Grade 8 Math scores improved 14% from 2012 to 2013

Grade 10 Math scores improved 7% from 2012 to 2013

Page 4: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

English Language Arts District MCAS Results

Page 5: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

ALL Grades ELA: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher

Page 6: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

3rd Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher

Page 7: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

4th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher

Page 8: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

5th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher

Page 9: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

6th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher

Page 10: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

7th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher

Page 11: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

8th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher

Page 12: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

10th Grade ELA: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher

Page 13: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

MathematicsDistrict MCAS Results

Page 14: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

ALL Grades Math: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher

Page 15: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

3rd Grade Math: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher

Page 16: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

4th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher

Page 17: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

5th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher

Page 18: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

6th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher

Page 19: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

7th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher

Page 20: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

8th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher

Page 21: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

10th Grade Math: MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher

Page 22: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Science, Technology & Engineering District MCAS Results

Page 23: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

5th Grade Science, Tech & Eng. : MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher

Page 24: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

8th Grade Science, Tech & Eng. : MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher

Page 25: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

10th Grade Biology : MURSD vs. State

% of students proficient or higher

Page 26: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Massachusetts’ Accountability System for Schools

Page 27: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Accountability Classifications

• Based on the premise of halving achievement gap by 2017

• Uses CPI (Composite Performance Index) metric• Also uses PPI (Progress & Performance Index)

factors such as moving students to higher categories, SGP, and graduation/dropout rates

• Schools classified as Level 1-5 based upon achievement of target CPI goals for all students and each subgroup based upon multiple years of ELA and math MCAS data as well as PPI factors

• Whatever the lowest rating is for any school within the district, that must be the rating for the district

Page 28: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Proficiency Gap Narrowing Targets for Clough ELA (Grades 3-4)

Com

posi

te P

erfo

rman

ce In

dex

(CPI

)

Page 29: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Proficiency Gap Targets & Results for Clough ELA (Grades 3-4)

Com

posi

te P

erfo

rman

ce In

dex

(CPI

)

Page 30: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Proficiency Gap Narrowing-Targets for Clough Math (Grades 3-4)

Com

posi

te P

erfo

rman

ce I

ndex

(C

PI)

Page 31: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Proficiency Gap Targets & Results for Clough Math (Grades 3-4)

Com

posi

te P

erfo

rman

ce I

ndex

(C

PI)

Level 3

Page 32: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Proficiency Gap Narrowing-Targets for Memorial ELA (Grades 3-4)

Com

posi

te P

erfo

rman

ce I

ndex

(C

PI)

Page 33: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Proficiency Gap Targets & Results for Memorial ELA (Grades 3-4)

Com

posi

te P

erfo

rman

ce I

ndex

(C

PI)

Page 34: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Proficiency Gap Narrowing-Targets for Memorial Math (Grades 3-4)

Com

posi

te P

erfo

rman

ce I

ndex

(C

PI)

Page 35: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Proficiency Gap Targets & Results for Memorial Math (Grades 3-4)

Com

posi

te P

erfo

rman

ce I

ndex

(C

PI)

Level 1

Page 36: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Proficiency Gap Narrowing-Targets for Miscoe ELA (All Grades 5-8)

Com

posi

te P

erfo

rman

ce I

ndex

(C

PI)

Page 37: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Proficiency Gap Targets & 2013 Results- Miscoe ELA

Com

posi

te P

erfo

rman

ce I

ndex

(C

PI)

Page 38: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Proficiency Gap Narrowing-Targets for Miscoe Math (All Grades 5-8)

Com

posi

te P

erfo

rman

ce I

ndex

(C

PI)

Page 39: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Proficiency Gap Targets & Results- Miscoe Math

Com

posi

te P

erfo

rman

ce I

ndex

(C

PI)

Level 2

Page 40: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Proficiency Gap Narrowing-Targets for Nipmuc ELA (Grade 10)

Com

posi

te P

erfo

rman

ce I

ndex

(C

PI)

Page 41: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Proficiency Gap Targets & Results - Nipmuc ELA

Com

posi

te P

erfo

rman

ce I

ndex

(C

PI)

Page 42: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Proficiency Gap Narrowing-Targets for Nipmuc Math (Grade 10)

Com

posi

te P

erfo

rman

ce I

ndex

(C

PI)

Page 43: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Proficiency Gap Targets & Results - Nipmuc Math

Com

posi

te P

erfo

rman

ce I

ndex

(C

PI)

Level 1

Page 44: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Comparison to Neighboring Comparison to Neighboring DistrictsDistricts

District

ELAProficient or

HigherMath Proficient

or Higher

Science Proficient or

HigherBellingham 73% 59% 60%

Blackstone-Millville 68% 61% 56%

Douglas 71% 61% 59%

Grafton 78% 73% 67%Hopedale 80% 69% 64%

Hopkinton 87% 81% 80%

Mendon-Upton 81% 72% 70%

Milford 71% 62% 64%

Northbridge 65% 50% 52%Sutton 72% 63% 60%

Uxbridge 65% 58% 53%

Page 45: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Comparison to like districts Comparison to like districts (DART)(DART)

District ELA Proficient or higher

Math Proficient or higher

Science and Tech Proficient or higher

Georgetown 76% 68% 57%Groton-Dunstable 84% 77% 81%

Hanover 82% 69% 65%Ipswich 82% 69% 65%

Lynnfield 90% 79% 74%Mendon-Upton 81% 72% 70%

Nashoba 83% 80% 70%Newburyport 82% 71% 71%North Reading 83% 76% 70%

Norwell 90% 76% 81%Scituate 86% 82% 71%

Tyngsborough 79% 71% 66%

Page 46: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Challenges Over the past four years, some grades and

subgroups are showing progress in ELA and math MCAS, while others are static or declining

Our high needs subgroup scores are lower than the aggregate- the major driver is the results of our special education students

More students need to move from proficient to advanced

Writing is an identified area in need of improvement

Math proficiency rates take a dip in 5th grade

Page 47: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Immediate Action Steps

Schools have analyzed disaggregated data at all levels and developed action plans

Writing committee formed and research begun on writing resources and programming

Curriculum mapping process launched, team trained in Rubicon Atlas

Vertical conversations on curriculum have begun

Academic Support grant to assist with secondary interventions for high need students

Page 48: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Future Action Steps

Data—Educators need more training in data analysis protocols

Curriculum—Align curriculum to the Common Core StandardsVertically align curriculum using Rubicon Atlas system

High Needs SubgroupIncrease training in inclusive instructional practices for all teachersIncrease use of comprehensive data to target interventions

Page 49: MURSD MCAS Results & Accountability Ratings for 2013

Targeted Investments

Curriculum Development—Time, training and support

Writing Program—Resources and professional development

Increase Non-fiction resources at elementary level

Coaching model for literacy and mathematics


Top Related