Download - Minnesota’s New Accountability System

Minnesota’s NewAccountability System

“Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”

education.state.mn.us

• ALL schools will be given an annual Multiple Measurements Rating (MMR)

• MMR consists of four measurements:– Proficiency– Student Growth– Achievement Gap Closure– Graduation Rate

2

Multiple Measurements

• Each domain is worth 25 points.• The MMR is generated by dividing the total

number of points earned by the total number of points possible.

• For most elementary and middle schools, 75 points possible. For most high schools 100 points possible.

• The MMR is a 0-100 percentage for all schools.

Total MMR

Total Focus Rating

• In addition to an MMR, every school gets a Focus Rating

• The Focus Rating measures proficiency and growth of minority students and students receiving special services (EL, Special Ed, Free and Reduced Price Lunch)

• Focus Rating combines Achievement Gap reduction and Focused Proficiency

• Each Domain is worth 25 points, for 50 possible points

education.state.mn.us 5

Multiple Measurement System – Results Page

Multiple Measurement System – Results - Initial 4/30/2012

AYPYear

NCLB ID

DistrictNumber

DistrictType

SchoolNumber

SchoolType

DistrictName

SchoolName

Title12012

SIGSchool MMR FR

MMRDesignation

INITIAL 5000 999901 001 High SchoolEXAMPLEVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT

TWINS SENIOR HIGH N N

63.96%

73.46%

INITIAL 5001 999901 002 Middle SchoolEXAMPLEVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT

VIKINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL N N

17.03%

42.41%

INITIAL 5002 999901 004Elementary School

EXAMPLEVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT

TIMBERWOLVES ELEMENTARY Y N

9.54%

32.58% Priority



WILD ELEMENTARY N N

57.63%

67.28%

Final Multiple Measurement

Rating

Focus Rating. “How are we doing on the Achievement

Gap?”

Was the school given a designation?

Summary Results - MMR

AYP Year

School Type

District Name School Name

2010 Elementary Exampleville School District

Timberwolves Elementary



Initial Elementary Exampleville School District


Multiple Measurement Rating

MMR Eligible

MMR Total Points

MMR Poss. Points

MMR

Y 10.2440389 75 13.66%

Y 4.070109445 75 5.43%

Y 14.31414835 150 9.54%

Did your school have sufficient data to be measured?

Which year is being measured, initial is a combination of 2010 and 2011

How many total points did the school earn?

How many points could the school have earned?

Summary Results – Focus Rate

AYP Year

School Type

District Name School Name





Initial Elementary Exampleville School District


FREligible

FR Total Points

FR Poss. Points

FR

Y 6.974060193 50 13.95%

Y 25.60245161 50 51.20%

Y 32.5765118 100 32.58%

Focus Rate

Did your school have sufficient data to be measured?

How many total points did the school earn?

How many points could the school have earned?

• Proficiency domain uses AYP index model.• Schools earn points based on a weighted

percentage of subgroups making AYP.• Weighting is based on the size of subgroups.• Unlike in AYP calculation, in MMR Proficiency,

groups can’t make AYP through Safe Harbor.

Proficiency

Summary Results – Proficiency Domain

AYP Year

School Name

2010 Timberwolves Elementary


Initial Timberwolves Elementary

Prof. Max Cell Count

Prof. WPC Making AYP

Prof. Percentile Prof. Points

238 0.64017075 0.343473451 8.586836283

252 0.5335153 0.120650954 3.01627385

Proficiency Domain

How many students were included in the measurement?

What was the weighted percentage of subgroups that hit their AYP target?

What is the school's percentile rank among other schools in the same grade range?

How many MMR points did we earn in this domain? (Percentile Rank x 25)

• Growth measures ability of schools to get students to exceed predicted growth.

• Growth predictions based on students’ last assessment result.

• Predictions generated by looking at two cohorts of students, where they scored one year and where they scored the next year.

• Student growth score based on being above or below prediction.

• School growth score is average of student growth scores.

Growth

Summary Results – Growth Domain

Growth Domain

AYP Year

School Name




Unique Growth Student Count

Growth Zscore Average

Growth Percentile Growth Points

153 -0.231967 0.034131737 0.853293413

158 -0.365409 0.01746988 0.436746988



What was the average growth score in the school?


• Measures the ability of schools to get higher levels of growth from lower-performing subgroups than statewide average growth for higher-performing subgroups.

• Growth of individual subgroups of students of color compared to growth of white students, Els compared to non-Els, FRPs compared to non-FRPs, SPED compared to non-SPED.

• Subtract schools’ growth scores for lower-performing groups from statewide averages of higher-performing groups.

• Negative score indicates success.

Achievement Gap Reduction

Summary Results – Achievement Gap Domain

AYP Year

School Name




Gap Unique Student Count

Gap AGR Score Gap Percentile Gap Points

82 0.461564 0.032156368 0.803909206

92 0.54205387 0.024683544 0.617088608

Achievement Gap Domain




What was our Achievement Gap reduction score? (Negative score is good.)

• Uses same methodology as Proficiency domain.• Looks at the percentage of subgroups that made

AYP in graduation rate.• Current AYP grad rate targets are 85%.• Targets are changing next year.• Groups can only get credit for meeting the

target, not through year-to-year improvements.

Graduation Rate

Summary Results – Graduation Rate Domain

AYP Year

School Name

2010 Twins Senior High

2011 Twins Senior High

Initial Twins Senior High

Grad Max Cell Count

Grad WPC Making AYP

Grad Percentile Grad Points

127 1 0.998360656 24.95901639

145 1 0.99829932 24.95748299

Graduation Rate Domain

AYP Year

School Name




Grad Max Cell Count

Grad WPC Making AYP

Grad Percentile Grad Points

0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0




What was the weighted percentage of subgroups that hit their AYP target?

Focused Proficiency

• Like Proficiency Domain, Focused Proficiency uses AYP index model.

• Schools earn points based on a weighted percentage of subgroups making AYP – but excludes the All Students subgroup and the White subgroup.

• Weighting is based on the size of subgroups.

Focused Proficiency Domain

AYP Year

School Name




Focus Max Cell Count

Focus WPC Making AYP

Focus Percentile Focus Points

94 0 0.246806039 6.170150987

105 1 0.99941452 24.985363

Focused Proficiency Domain




What was the weighted percentage of subgroups measured for AGR that hit their AYP target?

education.state.mn.us 18

MMR Designations

Multiple Measurement System – Results - Initial 4/30/2012

AYPYear

NCLB ID

DistrictNumber

DistrictType

SchoolNumber

SchoolType

DistrictName

SchoolName

Title12012

SIGSchool MMR FR

MMRDesignation

INITIAL 5000 999901 001 High SchoolEXAMPLEVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT

TWINS SENIOR HIGH N N

63.96%

73.46%

INITIAL 5001 999901 002 Middle SchoolEXAMPLEVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT

VIKINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL N N

17.03%

42.41%



TIMBERWOLVES ELEMENTARY Y N

9.54%

32.58% Priority



WILD ELEMENTARY N N

57.63%

67.28%

Was the school given a designation?


• MMR used to assign Title I schools to two categories:

127 Reward Schools (15 percent of Title I Schools) 42 Priority Schools (5 percent of Title I schools)

• FR used to assign schools to one category: 85 Focus Schools (10 percent of Title I Schools)

19

Recognition, Accountability and Support


• Annual reporting of more data than ever before• Continued reporting of AYP• Two additional categories of Title I schools

based on MMR starting in August:– Celebration Schools (“Next 10 percent”)– Continuous Improvement Schools (Bottom

25 percent)

20

What about the “other 70 percent”?

Title I Schools Rank Ordered 5 Groups Identified

1- Reward Schools

Top 15 % Identified

2- Priority Schools

Bottom 5% Identified

3- Focus Schools

Middle 10% with Extreme Achievement

Gaps

4- Continuous Improvement

Bottom 25% Identified

5- Celebration Schools

Next 25% Below Reward

May Apply

10% of Applicants Selected

Exit Criteria

• Priority Schools: Two consecutive years out of the bottom 25 percent on the MMR (‘13 & ‘14).

• Focus Schools: Two consecutive years out of the bottom 25 percent on the FR (‘13 & ‘14).

• SIG Schools: Opportunity to exit at end of grant (‘13) if out of bottom 25 percent on MMR that year. Several current SIG schools above cuts.

• Priority or Focus: Immediate exit if a Reward School after any year starting in ‘13.

Current 25th Percentiles and Reward Schools

• Elementary Schools: MMR 33.81%; FR 42.55%; Lowest Reward MMR 73.30%

• Middle Schools: MMR 18.68%; FR 42.96%; Lowest Reward MMR 79.05%

• High Schools: MMR 22.05%; FR 31.99%; Lowest Reward MMR 76.15%

• Numbers will be different every year. This is just an example.

MMR 25th %ile FR 25 %ile Reward School CutElementary 33.81% 42.55% 73.30%

Middle/Jr. High 18.68% 42.96% 79.05%

High School 22.05% 31.99% 76.15%

Current Exit Points

MMR and Designation Release Timeline

• MDE must run the MMR and designate the first round of Priority, Focus and Reward schools before the end of the school year.

• The first MMR and designations will be based off of data from 2010 and 2011.

• There will be no Celebration or Continuous Improvement Schools this year.

• Data from current year testing will be used in MMR released late this summer.

More Information and Help

• Visit http://education.state.mn.us/MDE/Welcome/AdvBCT/NCLBWaiver/index.html for FAQ, Glossary, Summaries, etc.

• Email [email protected] with questions.

http://education.state.mn.us/MDE/Welcome/AdvBCT/NCLBWaiver/index.html



mailto:[email protected]

Download - Minnesota’s New Accountability System

Top Related