Download - Lottery Case Study

Transcript
Page 1: Lottery Case Study

+

Financial Management Sankar

Akshay GoyalJitesh Agarwal

Srikanth Erraballi

Lottery Winnings

Looks Can Be Deceptive!

Page 2: Lottery Case Study

+Case Description

State Sponsored Lotteries Annual Sales: $1.69 bn Net Revenues: $618.5 Retailer Commission: $120.3 mn Lottery Prizes: $ 920.8 mn

The Big Game 7 States – Georgia, Illinois, Maryland, Massacheusetts,

Michigan, New Jersey & Virginia JackPot: $5 mn -- $ 363 mn Winning Amount: Annuitized Amount of $181.5 mn

The Michigan Lottery Two Ways – Annuity & Lump Sum Income Tax: 27% State Tax: 4.6%

{ Amount> $5,000}

Page 3: Lottery Case Study

+Option 1: Annuity Payments

A total of $181.5 mn is paid over a period of 25 years through 25 equal installments.

Option 2: Cash Payment

60% of the total jackpot amount

Page 4: Lottery Case Study

+ Annuity Option

Future Value (FV) = $181.5 mn

Present Value (PV) = 60% of $181.5 mn = $108.5 mn

Number of Annuities = 25

FV = PV(CVF i,25yrs)

$181.5 mn = $108.5 mn (CVF i, 25yrs)

=> i = 2%

FV= A (CVFA2%, 25yrs)

=> A = $5.67 mn

Page 5: Lottery Case Study

+ Taxation on Annuity Option

Page 6: Lottery Case Study

+Lump Sum Option

Page 7: Lottery Case Study

+Question 1

If you were one of the winners, which option would you select?

ANSWER

Since we get a greater amount through the annuity scheme, we would prefer to receive the lottery amount in annuities for a period of 25 years.

Page 8: Lottery Case Study

+Question 2

If you decide to select the annuity option, how much money would you receive each year after taxes?

ANSWER

As has already been shown, the annuity receivable each year is $3.87828 mn.

Page 9: Lottery Case Study

+Question 3

Is the state of Michigan justified in advertising the prize amount as $363 mn?

ANSWER

No. Since the winner receives only 60% of the prize amount at the time of winning, the prize amount should be advertised as $217.8 mn instead. In the annuity scheme, the advertised amount of $363 mn is the amount receivable after 25 years.

Page 10: Lottery Case Study

+Question 4

If the only option available were an annuity payment plan, what could Larry do to maximize the value of his winnings assuming that the risk free rate of interest is 4%?

ANSWER

Larry could start investing the annuities that he receives at the risk free market rate. This would increase the value he receives after 25 years!

Page 11: Lottery Case Study

+Question 5

Why do most winners select the cash option plan when given a choice?

ANSWER

Since the amounts receivable through both the plans are almost equal (approx. $124 mn), the winners go with the cash option.

A RUPEE IN HAND IS BETTER THAN TWO IN THE FUTURE!

Page 12: Lottery Case Study

+Question 6

If Michigan would like to give the annuity option an equal chance of being selected, how would it have to structure its payments?

ANSWER

Since the future value received through annuities depends more on the amount of each annuity than the number of annuities, the state could increase the annuity amount and decrease the number of years.

Page 13: Lottery Case Study

+

Thank You!!!

Any doubts or queries are welcome


Top Related