Transcript
Page 1: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

KERNEL AND NON KERNEL CLAUSES

Page 2: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

KERNEL CLAUSES

Kernel clause This term is introduced by Chomsky in

1950s. According to him kernel sentences define simple sentences which have not gone through any process of transformation. For example

The cake is nice Harry baked the cake

Page 3: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

NON KERNEL CLAUSES

Non kernel clauses Unlike kernel clause, non kernel clause

is the complex type of clauses. They get through different kinds of transformations which make the complicated. For example if we take the sentences of above kernel clauses, it will become non kernel in this way

The cake which Harry baked is nice

Page 4: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

EXPLANATION

The minimal structure of a sentence is known as KERNEL

Other items may be added to simple sentences

Negation ; Peter does not understand it Interrogation; did you buy the

newspaper today?

Page 5: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

Each of these structures are represented by means of a functional phrase

Negation: Neg P (negative phrase) Interrogation: Int P (interrogative

phrase) Note the movement of the subject is

always a rising one in English

Page 6: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

• There are two kinds of questions closed questions: with an auxiliary but no

wh word. The answer is usually yes or no Open questions: with a wh words • The movement of the interrogative

element, a wh word is direct. It does not jump along the different nodes, as the rising subject does but reaches the top position straight ahead.

Page 7: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

ANALYSIS OF KERNEL CLAUSES

(Your father) (washed the car again). subject predicate Characteristics of “subject”

Form class Position in declarative clauses Position in interrogative clauses Subject-verb agreement Case in personal pronoun Conditions on omissibility

Page 8: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

FORM CLASS

The prototypical subject is an NP; there is no predicate that cannot take an NP as subject

In KERNEL clauses virtually the only other form of subject we find is a subordinate clause

(that he was guilty) in That he was guilty was now clear to

everyone.

Page 9: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

POSITION IN DECLARATIVE CLAUSES

In declarative clauses the normal position for the subject is before the verb or with an intervening adverb phrase as:

Your father very often looses his temper

Page 10: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

POSITION IN INTERROGATIVE CLAUSES In main clauses containing an operator, the

simplest kind of interrogative clause is derived from its declarative counterpart by moving the operator to the left of the subject

Thus the declarative Your father is washing the car again, yields

interrogative Is your father washing the car again Dummy; do, does and did

Page 11: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

SUBJECT VERB AGREEMENT

Person-number properties of the verb are determined by agreement with the subject

Modal operators and past tenses of verbs other than be have no person number properties but we can apply the agreement criterion indirectly in such cases by changing the verb and /or the tense.

Page 12: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

Thus, Tom would not help me, there is no

agreement. But if we replace past modal wouldn’t by

present non modal doesn’t we can see that it is ‘Tom’ that selects doesn’t in contrast to don’t.

Similarly with Your father know them.

Page 13: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

CASE IN PERSONAL PRONOUN

A handful of pronouns, we have noted, have contrasting case forms

Nominative Accusative I me He him She her We us They them

Page 14: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

In finite clauses the subject requires a nominative form, while the object takes an accusative :

They shot him formal/informal it was I/it was

me

Page 15: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

CONDITION ON OMISSIBILITY

In kernel clauses the subject is an obligatory element, along with the predicator

The minimal kernel construction consists of just these two elements.

One respect in which a clause may be non kernel is by virtue of being

elliptical (you) be quiet!

Page 16: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

Subordinate non finites such as infinitival [ Ed remembered ] to take his keyCompare the finite main clause [ Ed took his key ] or present participle [ Liz married Ed before ] hearing of the

incident

Page 17: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

Notice that these particular non finite constructions require a double reference to the subject:

Firstly, The subordinate clause lacks a subject , so

that We understand “Liz married Ed before she

heard of the incident”, not “…………. Before he heard of the incident”

Page 18: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

CONCLUSION

In kernel clauses the subject is very easily identifiable by the criteria we have discussed before,

Some non kernel clauses lack a subject but some leave the subject intact.

For example,

Page 19: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

Coordination [Tom mowed the lawn] and your

father(sub) washed the car again Subordination [He says] that your father(sub)

washed the car again. Negation your father did not wash the car

again.

Page 20: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

PREDICATE

It is what is left of the clause when we remove the subject

I realize(superordinate clause) that he is ill(subordinate clause)

realize that is ill is ill

Page 21: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

Main verb as its ultimate head The predicate position is filled by a verb

phrase. Leaving aside cases of ellipsis, a VP contains

a verb as head optionally accompanied by one or more dependents.

Dependents of the predicator Complements Adjuncts

Page 22: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

EXAMPLE

Your father washed the car againNote: Complement is a function that we

shall be using in the analysis of other constructions than the VP

ComplementsThey are distinguished from adjuncts in

VP structure by following properties:

Page 23: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

Non omissibility Verb lexeme classification Form class

Page 24: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

NON OMISSIBILITY

Complements are sometimes obligatory whereas adjuncts are omissible

Examples He became ill & he used a drill.

Page 25: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

VERB LEXEME CLASSIFICATION

The selection of a complement of a particular type depends on the presence of a verb lexeme of an appropriate class whereas the selection of adjuncts is not lexically controlled in this way :

Take example Your father washed the car again

Page 26: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

There are lots of verbs which exclude the selection of a dependent with the function of the car.

your father hoped/disappointed/relied the car.

And thus “the car” although it is not obligatory , is identifiable as a complement.

“again” , by contrast, can occur with any verb and is accordingly an adjunct.

Page 27: Kernel and Non Kernel Clauses

FORM CLASS

The most central complements are NPs or AdjPs, while the most central adjuncts are AdvPs

The main exception involves temporal NPs like this morning last week,etcWhich although they can function as

complementAs in ‘I wasted this morning’ more often function

as adjunct as in ‘I arrived this morning’


Top Related