Transcript
Page 1: Investing in America’s  Electric Future

Investing in America’s Electric Future

Morry MarkowitzGroup Director, External Affairs

New Mexico Utility Shareholders AllianceOctober 7, 2009

Page 2: Investing in America’s  Electric Future

Demand for Electricity Is Projected to Increase 27% by 2030

2

Page 3: Investing in America’s  Electric Future

3

Annual Electricity Use in the Typical U.S.

Home Has Increased 60% Since 1970Average Annual Kilowatt-hour Sold Per Residential Customer

Page 4: Investing in America’s  Electric Future

4

Electricity Growth Is LinkedTo U.S. Economic Growth

Page 5: Investing in America’s  Electric Future

The Costs of Meeting Future Demand

Page 6: Investing in America’s  Electric Future

6

Investments in Generation

Inefficient, older power plants will be retired; new plants built.

240 gigawatts (GW) of new capacity will be needed by 2030.*

New capacity costs likely will be in excess of $400 billion.

*Source: Energy Information Administration

Page 7: Investing in America’s  Electric Future

7

Transmission Investments

Nearly $75 billion will have been invested between 2000 and 2010.

Customers will benefit from newer technologies and reliability.

Transmission InvestmentsBy Shareholder-Owned Electric Utilities

Page 8: Investing in America’s  Electric Future

8

Environmental Compliance Costs

From 2002-2005, the electric power industry spent at least $21 billion on compliance with federal environmental laws; state and local rules drive costs even higher.

EPA estimates that two rulemakings—the Clean Air Interstate Rule and the Clean Air Mercury Rule—will cost electric utilities and their customers almost $50 billion from 2007 to 2025.*

The research, design, development and deployment of new technologies needed to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions will require additional investments.

* CAMR is currently being resolved in the courts; compliance costs could rise under alternative regulatory regimes

Page 9: Investing in America’s  Electric Future

The Role of Energy Efficiency

Page 10: Investing in America’s  Electric Future

10

Energy-Efficiency and DSM Programs

Are Making a Difference Between 1989 and 2007,

electric company demand-side management (DSM) programs saved 929 billion kilowatthours (kWh) of electricity—enough to power 83 million average U.S. homes for one year.

These savings are equal to the annual electricity output of 147 baseload power plants [rated at 800 megawatts (MW) each and operating at a 90% capacity factor].

Electric utilities have spent nearly $35 billion on DSM programs from 1989-2007.

Page 11: Investing in America’s  Electric Future

11

Page 12: Investing in America’s  Electric Future

The Role of Renewables

Benefits and Challenges

Page 13: Investing in America’s  Electric Future

Benefits of Renewables

Help promote fuel diversity

Produce minimal environmental impact Largely free of carbon dioxide emissions

Low or no fuel costs

13

Page 14: Investing in America’s  Electric Future

Challenges Facing Renewables

High initial capital costs

Geographic limitations

Variable nature

Transmission availability and cost

Frequent expiration of production tax credit

Environmental and aesthetic challenges (NIMBY)

14

Page 15: Investing in America’s  Electric Future

What AboutClimate Change?

Page 16: Investing in America’s  Electric Future

16

EEI supports legislative proposals in Congress to reduce GHG emissions that: Sets targets and timetables for greenhouse gas emissions

reductions that are reasonable and achievable to help prevent sharp increases in electricity prices;

Allocates emissions allowances to the electricity sector for a transitional period;

Includes a “price collar,” or upper and lower limits on the price of emissions allowances; and

Promotes energy efficiency, renewable energy, new nuclear generation, and new advanced coal generation technologies with carbon capture and storage.

* The full text of the EEI climate change principles is available at www.eei.org.

Industry Climate Change Principles

Page 17: Investing in America’s  Electric Future

17

Addressing climate change requires an aggressive and sustained commitment to a full set of technologies, including: Efficiency Renewables Clean coal technologies Carbon capture and storage Nuclear Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles

What Will It Take?

Page 18: Investing in America’s  Electric Future

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030

U.S

. Ele

ctri

c S

ecto

rC

O2 E

mis

sio

ns

(mill

ion

met

ric

ton

s)

EIA Base Case 2008

Technology EIA 2008 Reference Target

Efficiency Load Growth ~ +1.05%/yr Load Growth ~ +0.75%/yr

Renewables 55 GWe by 2030 100 GWe by 2030

Nuclear Generation 15 GWe by 2030 64 GWe by 2030

Advanced Coal Generation

No Heat Rate Improvement for Existing Plants

40% New Plant Efficiency by 2020–2030

1-3% Heat Rate Improvement for 130 GWe Existing Plants

46% New Plant Efficiency by 2020; 49% in 2030

CCS None Widely Deployed After 2020

PHEV None10% of New Light-Duty Vehicle

Sales by 2017; 33% by 2030

DER < 0.1% of Base Load in 2030 5% of Base Load in 2030

EIA Base Case 2007

CO2 Reductions…What’s Technically Feasible?*

*Achieving all *Achieving all targets is very targets is very aggressive, but aggressive, but potentially feasiblepotentially feasible

Page 19: Investing in America’s  Electric Future

19

Auctioning Allowances Would Sharply Increase Costs to Customers

Page 20: Investing in America’s  Electric Future

The Dividend Tax Rate Reduction

Page 21: Investing in America’s  Electric Future

Dividend Tax Rate Reduction

Currently at 15%, set to expire at the end of 2010.

Vital to shareholders and the industry.

Proposals by President Obama and Senator Max Baucus (D-MT) would cap rate at 20%. ($200K for individuals, $250K for families)

Majority of shareholders would remain at 15%.

EEI and AGA coalition to support keeping dividend tax rate low. Visit www.defendmydividend.org .

Sign up today!

21


Top Related