Download - Hoax Speech
-
8/13/2019 Hoax Speech
1/12
ST TISTICS
HOAX
NOT A HOAX
NO OPINION
-
8/13/2019 Hoax Speech
2/12
TOPICS
1. ORIGIN
2. HOAX CLAIMS
3. MOTIVES
4. SCAN CONVERSION
5. PHOTOS6. IONIZING RADIATION AND HEAT
7. COMMUNICATION
8. MECHANICAL ISSUES
9. MOON ROCKS
10.LARGE TELESCOPES AND MOON HOAX
11.MYSTERIOUS DEATHS
-
8/13/2019 Hoax Speech
3/12
1. We Never Went to the Moon:
America's Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle
-Bill Kaysing1974
ORIGIN
2. Capricorn One
-Peter Hyams1978
Film showing mars mission
3. A Man On The Moon-Andrew Chaikin1994
Mentions that conspiracy were on since Dec 1968
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Kaysinghttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Hyamshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Chaikinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Chaikinhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Hyamshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Kaysing -
8/13/2019 Hoax Speech
4/12
HO X CL IMS
1.Complet Hoax:- Van Allen radiations, solar flares
3.Fake Photograph:- Philippe Lheureux in Lights On TheMoon says the photos were faked
2.Partial Hoax:- The astronauts returned halfway
-
8/13/2019 Hoax Speech
5/12
MOTIVES FOR CL IMS
1. COLD WAR:- To win race against Soviet Union..
2. MONEY:- NASA had raised around $30 billion..
3. DELIVERING THE PROMISE:- President Kennedys
words
-
8/13/2019 Hoax Speech
6/12
SC N CONVERSIONBlueprintsand design and development drawings of themachines involved are missing.Apollo 11 data tapes
containing telemetryand the high quality video (before
scan conversion) of the first moonwalk are missing.
Hoax proponents interpret this as support for the case
that they never existed.Only the Apollo 11 telemetrytapes made during the moonwalk are missingand notthose of Apollo 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blueprinthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telemetryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telemetryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blueprint -
8/13/2019 Hoax Speech
7/12
PHOTOS
1. Crosshairsappear to be behind objects.
2. Crosshairs are sometimes misplaced or rotated.
3. The quality of the photographs is implausibly high.
4. There are no starsin any of the photos.
5. The color and angle of shadows and light areinconsistent.
6. Identical backgrounds in photos which, according totheir captions, were taken miles apart.
7. The number of photographs taken is implausibly high.
Up to one photo per 50 seconds.
8. The photos contain artifacts like the two seemingly
matching 'C's on a rock and on the ground.
9. There appear to be "hot spots" in some photographs
that look like a huge spotlight was used at a close
distance.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reticlehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reticlehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reticle -
8/13/2019 Hoax Speech
8/12
IONIZING R DI TION ND HE T
1. The astronauts could not have survived the trip because ofexposure to radiation from the Van Allen radiation beltand
galactic ambient radiation.
2.Film in the cameras would have been fogged by this radiation.
3.The Moon's surface during the daytime is so hot that camera
film would have melted.
4.The Apollo 16crew should not have survived a big solar flare
firing out when they were on their way to the Moon. "They
should have been fried."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_16http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_flarehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_flarehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_16http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Allen_radiation_belt -
8/13/2019 Hoax Speech
9/12
COMMUNICATION
1. The lack of a more than two-second delay in two-way
communications at a distance of a 400,000 km.
2. Typical delays in communication were on the order of half a
second.
3. The Parkes Observatoryin Australiawas billed to the world
for weeks as the site that would be relaying communications
from the Moon, then five hours before transmission they were
told to stand down.
4. Parkes supposedly provided the clearest video feed from the
Moon, but Australian media and all other known sources ran a
live feed from the United States.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkes_Observatoryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkes_Observatory -
8/13/2019 Hoax Speech
10/12
MECH NIC L ISSUES1. No blast crater or any sign of dust scatter as was seen in the
16 mm movies of each landing.
2. The launch rocket (Lunar Module ascent stage) produced no
visible flame.
3. The rocks brought back from the Moon are identical to rocks
collected by scientific expeditions to Antarctica.
4. The presence of deep dust around the module; given the blastfrom the landing engine, this should not be present.
5. The flag placed on the surface by the astronauts flapped
despite there being no wind on the Moon.
6. The Lander weighed 17 tons and sat on top of the sand
making no impression but directly next to it footprints can beseen in the sand.
7. The air conditioning units that were part of the astronauts'
spacesuits could not have worked in an environment of noatmosphere.
8. The alleged Moon landings used either a sound stage, or were
put outside in a remote desert location with the astronauts
either using harnesses or slow-motion photography to make it
look like they were on the Moon and acting in lunar gravity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarcticahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarctica -
8/13/2019 Hoax Speech
11/12
MOON ROCKS
Hoax proponents argue that Wernher von Braun's trip to
Antarcticain 1967 (approximately two years before the July 16,
1969 Apollo 11 launch) was in order to
study and/or collect lunar meteoritesto be used as fake Moon
rocks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braunhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarcticahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_meteoritehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_rockhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_rockhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_rockhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_rockhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_meteoritehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antarcticahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun -
8/13/2019 Hoax Speech
12/12
LARGE TELESCOPES AND MOON HOAX
Hubble Space Telescopeshould be able to take pictures of the
lunar landing sites.
The argument runs that if telescopes can "see to the edge of the
universe" then they ought to be able to take pictures of the lunarlanding sites.
This implies that the world's major observatories (as well as the
Hubble Program) are complicit in the Moon landing hoax byrefusing to take pictures of the landing sites.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_Space_Telescopehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_Space_Telescope