Transcript
Page 1: Emergency planning for school safety

Making Schools

Safe Against

Disaster

David AlexanderUniversity College London

Page 2: Emergency planning for school safety

Analysis

• registered• archived• forgotten• ignored

Vulnerabilitymaintained-

• utilised• adopted• learned

Disasterriskreduced

+

LessonsPast

events

The process ofdisaster riskreduction(DRR)

Page 3: Emergency planning for school safety

ResilienceResistance

Risk Susceptibility

Physical(including natural,built, technological)

Social(including cultural,political, economic

EnvironmentAtt

ribut

es

Source: McEntire 2001

Liabilities

Capa

bilities

VULNERABILITY

Page 4: Emergency planning for school safety

Organisationalsystems:management

Socialsystems:behaviour

Naturalsystems:function

Technicalsystems:

malfunction

VulnerabilityHazard

Resilienc

e

Politicalsystems:decisions

Page 5: Emergency planning for school safety

Recoveryand

reconstruction

Mitigationandresilience

Preparationandmobilisation

Emergencyintervention

Quiescence

Crisis

The disastercycle

Page 6: Emergency planning for school safety

Disaster goes to school

Page 7: Emergency planning for school safety
Page 8: Emergency planning for school safety
Page 9: Emergency planning for school safety

[Courtesy ofProf. Omar Cardona]

Page 10: Emergency planning for school safety

This is a school!

Page 11: Emergency planning for school safety

This is another!

Page 12: Emergency planning for school safety

The loss of young, innocent livestouches a common thread of sentiment

in people who otherwise have noconnection with the event.

These events elicit massive outpouringsof public sympathy but are symptomatic

of failure to provide a safeenvironment for children's education.

Schooldisasters:

Page 13: Emergency planning for school safety

• natural disasters: floods, landslides,tornadoes, storms, earthquakes

• shootings, hostage-takings,other acts of terrorism

• fires, structural collapses.

The problem:-

Page 14: Emergency planning for school safety

In the 2003Boumerdes, Algeria,earthquake103 schools collapsed753 were seriouslydamaged and 2160were damaged orotherwise affected.

Page 15: Emergency planning for school safety

In the Bingöl earthquake of 1-5-2003in Turkey (0334 hrs, mag. 6.8,duration 17 secs):

• 3 school buildings totally collapsed

• 10 schools were badly damaged

• 12 schools were moderately damaged

• 3 schools were lightly damaged

• 84 boys died while sleeping in aschool dormitory that collapsed(=50% of overall death toll).

Page 16: Emergency planning for school safety

Repetitive seismic risk: in Turkey,eight million children attend 34,000 schools

that are vulnerable to seismic damage.

Some of the most seismic countries havesome of the youngest populations

(e.g. Iraq, Afghanistan, Indonesia).

Page 17: Emergency planning for school safety

Responsibilities for ensuringsafety are commonly split

between school staffs,education authorities,

municipal engineers andgovernment departments.

It is remarkable howunsophisticated school

emergency preparednessusually is: would

other organisationsof similar complexitypermit such laxity?

Page 18: Emergency planning for school safety

If the1994 Northridge,

California, earthquakehad occurred duringschool time, it wouldhave been necessary

to send 6500 childrenhome, but many of

them would not havefound parents there.

Page 19: Emergency planning for school safety

• children have a full moral right toeducation and safety at school.

• about one billion children of schoolage live in seismically active countries

• perhaps one third go to seismicallyunsafe schools (and one seventh haveno schools to attend at all)

The global situation:-

Page 20: Emergency planning for school safety

Estimate of seismic death tolls in schools:

• over the next decade

• for the 20 most seismic countries

• events of MMI=VIII or greater

• children at school for 6-23%of the year (105-250 days)

• child deaths in collapsed schoolsestimated at 4800 per decade.

• median 100 children per school

• 15-30 earthquakes per year causeschools to collapse, 40% mortality rate

Page 21: Emergency planning for school safety

Reality: in the Kashmir earthquake of 200510,000 schools collapsed

17,000 children died in them.

Page 22: Emergency planning for school safety

Schoolsafety:

someanswersto the

problem

Page 23: Emergency planning for school safety

HOW PEOPLEPERCEIVE RISK

ABILITY TOPERCEIVE RISK

EXPERIENCEWITH RISK

ACCESS TOINFORMATION

ABILITY TOREDUCE RISK:

• money • expertise • knowledge• resources

WHETHERRISK HAS

BEEN ABATED

PEOPLE'S IDEASABOUT POSSIBLE

DAMAGE AND LOSS

PROPENSITYTO DENY RISK

Page 24: Emergency planning for school safety

Riskanalysis

Risk assessment

Risk communication

KnowledgePerception

Institutionallearning

Adaptation

Disaster threat

Risk management

Page 25: Emergency planning for school safety

The arguments for school safety:

• morality and human rights

• duty of care to children (in loco parentis)

• cost-effectiveness

• the need to provide education

• multiple functions of schools in thecommunity: schools as community centresor shelter for homeless survivors.

Page 26: Emergency planning for school safety

• physical hazards (structural & fitments)

• behavioural hazards(what people do in a crisis)

• external hazards that affect thebuilding (such as floods, explosions,earth tremors, landslides, subsidence)

• internal hazards that affect abilityto adopt self-protective behaviour,e.g. fire or collapse of ceilings.

Hazards to schools can be divided into:-

Page 27: Emergency planning for school safety
Page 28: Emergency planning for school safety

• there is no simple rule for self-protective behaviour in school buildings.

• competitive behaviour among childredengendered by panic-induced flighthas been reported during earthquakesin China, Mexico and Egypt

• when buildings collapse, childrenand teachers are very efficientlycrushed under flimsy desks.

Behavioural factors:-

Page 29: Emergency planning for school safety

Evacuation remains the single mosteffective strategy for avoiding danger, but

only if it can be completed in conditionsof relative safety—i.e. rarely

during the main impact or crisisperiod, when there may be:

• distortion of doorways

• overturning or collapse offittings, fixtures and furniture

• severed power lines in puddles outside.

• façade collapse

Page 30: Emergency planning for school safety

• the building should not merely giveshelter but also provide refuge

• procedures for vacating schools duringemergencies should lead the occupantsprogressively further away from danger.

Page 31: Emergency planning for school safety
Page 32: Emergency planning for school safety

Inlocoparentis

Hazards ofevacuation torefuge site

Conve

rgence

reaction

of pare

nts

Convergence reactionof emergency services

Park

ing and

traffic flow

?

Hazard impact to school

Hazards of evacuationto assembly area

Information flow?School

Page 33: Emergency planning for school safety

Sharing the burden and developinga sense of commitment:

• teachers have a highly variable levelof interest in emergency planning

• children are an effective channel forgetting hazard and risk info to families

• children also adapt remarkablywell to unfamiliar situations

• education in risk management is needed

• generally, improved communicationis needed regarding school safety.

Page 34: Emergency planning for school safety

The destruction of 190 unreinforcedmasonry schools in the Long Beach,

California, earthquake of 10-3-1933(M=6.2) led to the Field Act for theengineering seismic safety of schoolbuildings, which was passed exactlyone month after the earthquake.

The importance of legislation

Page 35: Emergency planning for school safety

Procedures for designing school evacuation plans

Page 36: Emergency planning for school safety

Emergency planningis not

rocket science...

Page 37: Emergency planning for school safety

...it's a matter of common sense...

Page 38: Emergency planning for school safety

...and organisation!

Page 39: Emergency planning for school safety

Major eventmanagement

Incidentmanagement

Population(community)protection

Hazardforecasting,monitoring,etc.

Plans,procedures,protocols

Human andmaterialresources

Page 40: Emergency planning for school safety

(1) Assemble materials• local maps• plan of school• describe school

(2) Describe setting of school• surrounding area• location of nearest emergency services.

Page 41: Emergency planning for school safety

(3) Identify and assess local hazards• possible impacts on school

(4) Response scenarios• evacuation routes, with alternatives• assembly points, theirsafety, ease of access

• refuges (churches, communitycentres, etc.) and routes to them.

Page 42: Emergency planning for school safety

(5) Procedures• teachers assemble students at primaryassembly point, take attendance

• monitors conduct asweep of the buildings

• evacuation option chosenand implemented

• students taken to secondary assembly point

(6) Which emergency services, in whatorder, from where, and how soon?.

Page 43: Emergency planning for school safety

(7) Teachers and head to knowwho incident commander isand what emergency forcesare present or on their way

(8) Procedures used tochoose evacuation options

(9) Conduct evacuation drills• permanent signs (colouredarrows) to exits.

Page 44: Emergency planning for school safety

(10) Periodic surveys of access to exits• remove obstacles

(11) Study means of avoiding congestion

(12) Avoid gymnasia or structureswith roofs that could collapseduring an impact.

Page 45: Emergency planning for school safety

(13) Evaluate interior hazards

(14) Procedure for posting anddisseminating disaster plans

• ensure that all personnel have read,understood and remembered

• share plans with town officials.

Page 46: Emergency planning for school safety

(15) Are all exits safefor use in all cases?

(16) Plan role of school'sfirst-aid officer

(17) Can school be re-enteredafter impact?

• designate rooms for first aid.

Page 47: Emergency planning for school safety

(18) Procedure for contacting parentsand safely returning students tothem if school closes

(19) On-site and off-site liabilitycustodial liability (in loco parentis)

(20) Acquaint parents with theschool's evacuation plans andinform them of where theiroffspring can be picked up underparticular evacuation situations.

Page 48: Emergency planning for school safety
Page 49: Emergency planning for school safety

Conclusions

Page 50: Emergency planning for school safety

• like hospitals, schools arecritical facilities of great strategicimportance in disaster situations

• the extent of the risk to them isnot fully appreciated by decision makers

• community involvement canchange risk situations for the better

• the solutions are multi-faceted

• high-priority global security programmesare required, under UN auspices.

Page 51: Emergency planning for school safety

Usage and state of maintenanceof buildings change over time butaggregate vulnerability appears

to remain frustratingly constant.

Page 52: Emergency planning for school safety

No school should be without aproperly tested emergency plan.

• hazard investigations, school designand the observation of building codes

• school construction,maintenance and improvement

• management and use of schools

• evacuation and the care of children

Common standards are needed for:-

Page 53: Emergency planning for school safety
Page 54: Emergency planning for school safety

Personalor privateinterestsPublic

interestCultural

acceptability

LESSONS...LEARNED?

Sustainablelessons Uncertainty,

unpredictability

LESSONS...LEARNED?

Incentivesto learn

Page 55: Emergency planning for school safety

[email protected]/dealexanderwww.emergency-planning.blogspot.com


Top Related