Transcript
Page 1: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

EFFECI'S OF SAND BURIAL AND MOVEMENT ON ROCKY INTERTIDAL BENCH COMMUNITIES IN CENTRAL CALIFORNIA

A thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University

and Moss Landing Marine Laboratories

in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the

degree

Master of Science In

Marine Sciences

by

Carolyn Kathryn Bretz

Moss Landing, California

1995

Page 2: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

EFFECTS OF SAND BURIAL AND MOVEMENT ON ROCKY INTERTIDAL BENCH COMMUNITIES IN CENTRAL CALIFORNIA

Carolyn Kathryn Bretz

San Francisco State University

1995

ABSTRACT

Sand burial may play an important role in determining the local, small scale distribution

and abundance of many rocky intertidal species at Waddell Bluffs and Scott Creek. The

purpose of this research was to explore the role of natural sand accumulation in structuring

benthic algal and sessile invertebrate communities within a system seemingly dominated by

this physical disturbance. Intertidal assemblages were influenced by a seasonally recurring

gradient of sediment burial resulting in temporal and spatial heterogeneity. The mosaic

patterns produced were responses to different microhabitats and intercommunity

successional stages created by seasonal disturbance. Seasonal surveys showed areas with

heaviest sediment deposition harbored a mixture of fleshy brown (Pelvetia fastigiata) and

red (Mastocarpus papillatus, Mastocarpus jardinii and Mazzaella splendens) algae, and

extremely low densities of grazing invertebrates, possibly due to their intolerance to

prolonged burial. The green algae, Ulva sp. dominated sites where sand burial was

intermediate. Marine invertebrates were still rare at intermediate sites. Sand covered both

of these assemblages most of the year. The third major assemblage was formed by the

filamentous red alga, Polysiphonia pacifica, which encompassed areas with low, but

persistent sand cover (never more than 5-10 em thick). Other areas with low sand cover

Ill

Page 3: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

were dominated by the anemone, A11tlwpleura elegantissima, and the sand tolerant alga,

Neorlwdomela larix.

Experimental clearings created in each algal assemblage were colonized by the common

algal species surrounding each 1 m2 patch, suggesting that either dispersal was limited or

colonizers were influenced strongly by local habitat characteristics. Recolonization by

limited dispersal in sand-swept habitats could explain these results. These hypotheses were

tested partially in reciprocal transplants of Mastocarpus papillatus and Polysiplwnia pacifiCa

which showed differential survival with varied sand burial depths. M. papillatus persisted

under deep sediment burial for significantly (p<.OS) longer periods than P. pacifica. Cover

of the latter decreased more than 77% after a few weeks of thick sand cover.

These results generally suggest that biotic patterns of distribution and abundance in

sand-impacted areas are influenced by species-specific adaptation to the intensity of

sediment disturbance (e.g. duration and depth of sediment cover) and opportunistic life

histories. Results reported here support the notion that persistent mosaic patterns arise

from species responses to small scale environmental heterogeneity (Whittaker and Levin

1977).

Key words: algae; anemone; California; community structure; disturbance; microhabitat;

mosaic; persistence; rocky intertidal; sand scour; sediment inundation; tolerance

I certify that the Abstract above is a correct representation of the content of the thesis.

Thesis Advisor Date

IV

Page 4: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Alt/wugh nature begins with the cause and. ends with the experience, we must follow the opposite course, to begin with experience and by the mea/IS of it investigate the cause.

Leonardo da Vinci

This thesis went to hell and back. It only seems fitting to thank those that made the

journey with me. Through coursework and discussions, I have received a great deal of

scientific advice and wisdom from my committee members Drs. Michael Foster, James

Barry, and John Oliver. For this I am grateful. Many thanks to Dr. Thomas Niesen who

took time from his hectic schedule to read my thesis and participate as a committee member.

A significant part of my career at Moss Landing Marine Labs was inspired by John Oliver.

John has always encouraged me to follow the rules of science, but to have fun doing it. I

am grateful he took the time to support my interest in pursuing too many projects.

I am eternally grateful to the many friends that rode with me through the best and

worst times. Thanks to those that assisted me in the field and lab, especially Ken Israel,

Cassandra Roberts, Mary Nishimoto, Mike McNulty, Dahnmit McHue, and Gina Crane.

Thanks also to my very supportive friends Diana Steller, Nicole Crane, Sandy Yarbrough

and Sandi O'Neil; and Dr. Andrew DeVogelaere who had a fresh perspective and always

provided a chuckle.

My graduate career would not have been possible without the love and support of

some very special people. I owe alot to my parents, whose avid interest in nature and the

scientific world was an impetus for my own love of science. Special admiration and

respect go to Jim Barry who not only gave unlimited scientific guidance, but was a

personal inspiration in many, many ways.

This work was supported, in part, by a grant from the California Department of

Transportation.

v

Page 5: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OFT ABLES ............................................................................ viii

LIST OFF1GURES .......................................................................... x

INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 1

METHODS AND TECHNIQUES .......................................................... 5

Study Site ........................................................................... 5

Intertidal Survey Stations ......................................................... 5

Physical Environment ............................................................. 6

Species Composition and Cover ................................................. 6

Field Experiments .................................................................. 8

Artificial Clearing ................................................................ 8

Transplant Experiment .......................................................... 9

Statistical Analyses ................................................................. 10

RESULTS ...................................................................................... 12

Species Composition in Intertidal Mosaic ....................................... 12

Sediment Influence on Species Composition and Cover ...................... 13

Clearing Experiments .............................................................. 14

Reciprocal Transplants ............................................................ 16

Herbivore Densities ................................................................ 17

D!SCUSSION ................................................................................. 19

General Patterns .................................................................... 19

Assemblage Patterns ............................................................... 21

Algal Translocation ................................................................ 25

vi

Page 6: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Clearing Experiment ............................................................... 27

Benthic Invertebrates .............................................................. 30

Rocky Shore-Sandy Beach Ecotone ............................................. 31

LITERATURE CITED ....................................................................... 34

vii

Page 7: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

1. Time table showing duration of ol:iservations and experiments ...................... .41

2. Summary of sand deposition at rocky intertidal stations from Waddell Bluffs

and Scott Creek based on monthly samples for 14 months (July 1988 to August

1989). Assemblage type was named for the dominant species characterizing that

station. !=artificially armored shoreline. nd=no data .................................. .43

3. Colonization of algal removal plots in the Ulva, Polysiphonia and Red-Brown

Algal habitat Plots were cleared February 1, 1990 and sampled periodically

until AprilS, April 29 and May 13, respectively. Each data point represents the

mean (±1 SE) of 4-6 plots. Entero-diatom refers to an Enteromorphal

filamentous diatom mix found in the shallow depressions of the rocky bench.

Arrow indicates date of initial clearing .................................................. .4S

4. Single factor analysis of variance (ANOV A) results are shown for seasonal

sand depth versus assemblage (n=14). Student-Neuman-Keuls (SNK) test was

used for pairwise multiple comparisons (Zar 1984). *p<O.OS, ns=non

significant (p>O.OS) ....................................................................... .47

Sa. Results of reciprocal transplant experiments. Data are the mean number (±SE)

of thalli and percent cover of transplants over time for Mastocarpus and

Polysiplwnia, respectively. Comparison of transplants with a cleared border

and non-border are shown. In the field, transplants were marked with coded

PVC to indicate patch type (Mastocarpus {M} or Polysiplwnia {P}), treatment

replicate number (1-S), and treatment type (species and border). Categories for

qualitative observations of unmanipulated plants within recipient patches are as

follows: no change (NC), healthy appearance(+), tissue loss(-), disintegrated

(D), orange, white or bleached appearance (B), gone (0) ........................... .49

Sb. Results of reciprocal transplant experiments. Data are mean sand depth over

time in recipient patches (n=IO). Measurements were made at3, 12, and 2S

weeks ........................................................................................ Sl

viii

Page 8: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

6a. Single factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) results are shown for transplant

experiment recipient site (n=6) versus treatment border (n=3). ANOVA results

demonstrating significance were analyzed with Student-Neuman-Keuls (SNK)

test for multiple comparisons (Zar 1984). *p<O.OS, **p<O.Ol, ns=non

significant (p>O.OS) ........................................................................ 53

6b. Repeated measures ANOVAs {model Ill} were used on pooled data to detect

differences in transplant border effect over time. AN OVA results demonstrating

significance were analyzed with Student-Neuman-Keuls (SNK) test for multiple

comparisons (Zar 1984). *p<O.OS, **p<O.Ol, ns=non significant (p>0.05) ..... .55

7. Relative abundance (per m2) of benthic invertebrates living in rocky intertidal

habitats with and without seasonal sand cover. Quadrats (0.10m2) were

sampled at random locations along 50m horizontal transects at 3 elevations ranging

from -0.1 to 2.5m. Areas were sampled in summer and winter of 1990. Numbers

indicate mean and ±1 stnndard deviation (n=60). *Balanus glandula are recorded as

percent cover and are not included in the category All Species ....................... 57

8. Seasonal differences in invertebrate density were analyzed with two-tniled

independent t-tests between selected seasons, habitnts and sites (n=60).

*p<O.OS, **p<O.Ol, ***p<0.001, ns=non significant (p>0.05) .................... 59

9. Grain size analysis of sediment from algal habitnts and Waddell Creek beach.

Values indicate percentnges from totnl size distribution or sorting value. Bolded

values indicate dominant grain sizes. Sediment class size divisions are: coarse

grain= 2.0-1.0 mm, medium grain= 0.354-0.177 mm, fine grain= 0.125-0.088

mm, and silt= <0.088 mm. N=3. Silty sediment was <1% for both seasons at

all areas ...................................................................................... 61

IX

Page 9: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Page

1. Map of permanent sampling stations"at Waddell Bluffs and Scott Creek in central

California. Numbers indicate station reference markers on rocky shale bench

outlines ...................................................................................... 63

2. Winter (top) and summer (bottom) cover of beach sand over the rocky shale

benches under Waddell Bluffs. Arrows indicate natuml boulder markers ........... 65

3. Field design for the reciprocal tmnsplant experiment. Factors include sand depth

(low, high), and border effect (none, 10 em). Three treatment levels (reciprocal

transplant, reciprocal tmnsplant with a 10 em clearing, and a control translocation)

were used to test the response of tmnsplanted algae to different sand habitats (n=5).

Qualitative "natuml" controls of unmanipulated plants within each recipient patch

were also examined (not shown). Recipient patches (n=6) in high and low sand

habitats dominated by Mastocarpus papil/atus and Polysiplwnia pacifica,

respectively, were chosen mndomly. Percent cover and number of thalli were

measured over a 6 month interval for P. pacifica and M. papillatus,

respectively .................................................................................. 67

4. Seasonal change in sand depth in rock-y intertidal habitats at Waddell Bluffs and

Scott Creek sites. Data were collected monthly for 14 months from May 1988

through August 1989. Each point represents the mean (±1 standard error) of

measurements from random locations (n=10) .......................................... 69

5. Tree diagmm resulting from avemge linkage clustering using Ward Minimum

Variance Method on percent cover data Euclidean distance was used to measure

similarity, demonstmted by clustering of independent stations (and replicates)

into 4 distinct groupings chamcterized by taxonomic relationship. Labels indicate

site (Waddell Bluffs, w, and Scott Creek, s), station number, and replicate number

(1-5) .......................................................................................... 71

6. Percent cover of Viva sp. and sand depth for intertidal sites dominated by Viva sp.

Data were collected monthly from July 1988 through August 1989. Sand depths

X

Page 10: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

6. Percent cover of Viva sp. and sand depth for intertidal sites dominated by Ulva sp.

Data were collected monthly from July 1988 through August 1989. Sand depths

and percent algal cover are the mean (±1 standard deviation) of 10 and 5

measurements from random locations, respectively. nd=no data for percentage algal

cover. Note scale change from a, c to b. Areas indicating an unknown percent cover

due to sand are designated with [?~ followed by a dashed line ........................ 73

7. Percent cover (n=5) of brown and red macroalgae and sand depth (n=IO) for

intertidal sites dominated by this mixed assemblage. Only species which held an

average of >5% cover at some sampling date are included. nd=no data for

percentage algal cover ...................................................................... 75

8. Percent cover (n=S) of Polysiphonia pacifica and sand depth (n=10) for

intertidal sites dominated by Polysiphonia .............................................. ??

9. Percent cover (n=5) of Antlwpleura elegantissima and sand depth (n=IO) for

intertidal sites dominated by the sea anemone ........................................... 79

XI

Page 11: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

INTRODUCTION

Physical disturbance can be important in providing space for colonization by

opportunistic and late successional species and has been shown to maintain diversity in

some systems by preventing monopolization of space by competitive dominants (Dayton

1971; Connell 1972; Sousa 1984; Pickett 'and White 1985). Disturbances, such as the

seasonal shifting of sand causing frequent episodes of burial and scour in intertidal

habitats, have an enormous, but poorly understood, effect on community development and

organization (Daly and Mathieson 1977; Taylor and Littler 1982; Littler et al. 1983). Daly

and Mathieson ( 1977) found that the microhabitats created by sand disturbance were

difficult, if not impossible, to characterize since they reflected both varying depths of burial

and frequencies of abrasion.

The habitat ecotone between exposed rocky shores and adjacent sandy beaches is an

insufficiently understood environment (Stewart 1983; Dethier 1991). Species living within

this environment must have behavioral and physical attributes that allow them to survive the

constraints of both habitats. In addition to factors such as wave exposure, desiccation,

insolation, predation, and grazing associated with rock)' shores, the biota of sand-swept

rocky habitats must endure additional physical stress from scour and burial by sediments

leading to abrasion and light reduction. Relatively few studies of rocky intertidal systems

have assessed the effects of sediments from adjacent beaches on the structure of

populations and communities (Frank 1965; Dalli 1969; Markham and Newroth 1972;

Markham 1973; Daly and Mathieson 1977; Mathieson 1982; Robles 1982; Littler et al.

1983; D'Antonio 1986; Shaughnessy 1986). Most that have addressed this question have

done so for only a few macroalgae and large grazing invertebrates and have not addressed

whole community patterns and how sand may influence the distribution of all or most

species.

Compared to the many studies on vertical zonation of rocky intertidal biota, little

information is available on factors influencing horizontal patterns, although horizontal

1

Page 12: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

gradients are comm·on. Removal of intertidal organisms by seasonal disturbance provides

cleared areas for new recruits and can be important in maintaining a horizontal mosaic of

species on cobble substrates (Davis and Wilce 1987), boulders (Sousa 1979), intertidal

benches (Paine and Levin 1981; Farrell 1989), tidepools (Dethier 1984) and in sediment

(see Thistle 1981 review). According to Whittaker and Levin (1977), a community mosaic

is created as a result of specialized adaptation and/or resilience to particular microhabitat

structure. If the duration and depth of sand cover or other factors vary between habitats,

two or more species may cooccur in the community with each population centered in sites

more favorable for it, thus resulting in community patchiness. The preference of different

species for unique parts of the mosaic thus creates additional potential for cooccurance of

species (see Levin 1974) and may result in the intermingling of subclimax and mature

intertidal communities (Taylor and Littler 1982; littler et a/. 1983). A combination of

physical and biological stresses, at frequencies and intensities dependent upon site

characteristics, will result in environmental quality suitable for some species and unsuitable

for others (Whittaker and Levin 1977; Pickett and White 1985; Farrell 1989). Daly and

Mathieson (1977) suggested that microhabitats may develop in rocky intertidal areas

disturbed by sand which may, ultimately, produce a mosaic pattern of diversity and

abundance of opportunistic annuals and psammophytic species. These patterns may indeed

reflect varying intensities of sand thickness, abrasion, and light exposure as well as

seasonal release from sediment accumulation. D'Antonio (1986) postulated that the relative

abundance of plants in these categories may vary with the depth, duration of cover, and

intensity of the sediment disturbance.

Community mosaics observed at two sites in central California raised questions

about the distribution and cooccurance of saxicolous algae and sessile invertebrates in areas

of seasonal sand accumulation. Initial yearlong observations revealed repetitive temporal

and spatial patterns, indicating the yearly persistence of several intertidal plant and animal

populations. It was not clear whether the persistence of these community mosaic patterns

2

Page 13: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

was due to predictable microhabitat variation in seasonal depth distribution, or was a

successional response to varying disturbance. The accessibility of the study sites provided

the opportunity to investigate the response of patches to physical processes, such as sand

burial.

Objectives

Most studies indicating the importance of sediment disturbance to the persistence of

a particular intertidal community structure have investigated the relationship between

disturbance and population structure using percent sediment cover as the primary measure

of disturbance (Markham and Newroth 1972; Markham 1973; Daly and Mathieson 1977;

Littler and Littler 1980; Mathieson 1982; Seapy and Littler 1982; Littler et al. 1983; Hay

1981; D'Antonio 1986; Gibbons 1988). However, the combined effects of both the cover

and depth of sediment may be more indicative of disturbance severity (i.e., an area with

100% cover could have a sediment thickness of 1 em or 100 em). Distribution studies that

included depth as a variable of disturbance have correlated it with the presence or absence

of single species (Frank 1965; Daly and Mathieson 1977; Mathieson 1982; Pineda and

Escofet 1989). The physical characteristics of the Waddell Bluffs and Scott Creek intertidal

(see Study site) presented a unique opportunity for studying the effects of nonuniform sand

burial on a homogeneous rock substrate. The objectives of this investigation were to

evaluate the effects of duration of burial and sediment depth on the local, small scale

distribution of several intertidal algal and invertebrate species at a site on the outer coast of

central California The following specific questions were addressed:

1) What patterns of sediment burial occur at the rock-y intertidal-sandy beach

interface?;

2) How do distribution patterns of intertidal flora and fauna vary with sediment

distribution at this interface?;

3

Page 14: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

3) Do patches of various species persist through time; and

4) If so, are these mosaic patterns maintained by individual species' tolerance to

heterogenous microhabitats?

Surveys of intertidal sites provide.;) information on seasonal patterns of sand

movement on and off rocky intertidal benches, and the abundance and distribution of algae

and sessile invertebrates during periods of sand subsidence. Correlations were used to

evaluate the relationship between the depth and duration of sediment cover and floral and

faunal distribution. Community development was monitored after the disturbance and

manipulative field experiments were established to emulate natural sediment disturbance.

4

Page 15: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

METHODS AND TECHNIQUES

Study Site

Observations, sampling, and experimental manipulations were made at Waddell

Bluffs (37°06'16 N, 122°17'18 W) and Scott "creek (37°02'31 N, 122°13'56 W), Santa Cruz

County, California (Figure 1). Intertidal study areas at these sites were approximately 600

x 150m and 330 x 250m for Waddell and Scott Creek, respectively.

Waddell Bluffs (Figure 1a) consist of an extremely unstable Franciscan Shale with

highly erodible rocks that are composed of interbedded mudstones and siltstones. As a

result, landsliding is frequent and extensive (Hecht et al. 1973). Sandy beaches and large,

relatively flat shale benches are present in the littoral habitats bordering the bluffs. Sand

moves on and off large sections of the rocky habitat each year (Figure 2). Winter storms

remove sand, exposing the shale benches from the lower to upper intertidal; sand returns

from late spring until fall (Davis and Ethington 1976; Aubrey 1979). Benches may

accumulate as much as 50 centimeters of sand within a 24 hour period. Slight irregular

sediment fluctuations occur throughout the year.

The Scott Creek area (Figure 1b) has a similar stratigraphic composition to Waddell

Bluffs but is less frequently subject to coastal landslides. The physical processes and biota

characterizing the intertidal resemble those at Waddell Bluffs, making it a valuable site for

comparison to the landslide affected site. Large permanent, high-energy beaches occur

south of both areas adjacent to the rock-y terraces.

Intertidal Survey Stations

Sampling strata at Waddell and Scott Creek sites were chosen on the basis of

species composition during winter months. Stations were marked with plastic-capped

stainless steel pipes (visible above the highest sand thickness during summer) fixed to the

substrate with bolts and z-spar epoxy-putty (Kop-CoatMarine Group©, NJ). Percentage cover

5

Page 16: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

of all identifiable species and primary cover of sand were monitored monthly from May

1988 to August 1989 and quarterly from August 1989 to March 1991. Several field

experiments were conducted at selected stations (see Experiments). Table 1 indicates the

duration of sampling and experiments.

Physical Environment

Seasonal changes in beach elevation were measured on the permanent and

temporary beaches at Waddell and Scott Creek using standard profiling techniques (Aubrey

1979) at five meter intervals from fixed markers. To assess temporal changes in beach

configuration, survey profile elevations were taken of both permanent and seasonal beaches

at both Waddell and Scott Creek in 1988, 1990, and 1991. Sediment cores (n=3) were

collected randomly during 1991-1992 from permanent stations within biotic assemblage

patches, the seasonal beach at Waddell, and Waddell Creek beach (permanent beach).

Grain size was determined by a dry-shake method of material separation (Krumbein and

Pettijohn 1938) and fractions weighed to the nearest 0.001g. The textural components of

these analyses are shown in Table 9. Accumulation of sand was recorded within patches at

each pennanent station by measuring sand depth above the underlying shale with a marked

steel rod. Ten random depth measurements were taken monthly at each station from 1988

to 1991. Table 21ists sand depth parameters from July 1988 to August 1989 as the mean

depth measurements (n=10) from each sampling month. Yearly and seasonal sand cover

and movement pattern (approach and subsidence) were also documented in photographs

taken from adjacent cliff overlooks of each intertidal study area. Sampling days each

month were determined by the lowest daylight tides.

Species Composition and Cover

Diversity and abundance of dominant macroalgae and sessile invertebrates were

6

Page 17: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

measured at seven permanent stations at Waddell Bluffs and three stations at Scott Creek

(Figure 1). Station elevations (fable 2) were measured using a standard theodilite and tide

levels predicted in tide tables. Six randomly placed 0.5m2 quadrats were photographed

monthly at each station, five for analyses and one alternate if needed. Species composition

and cover were determined in the laboratory from analyses of the photoquadrats and field

notes. Photographs were projected on to a uniformly spaced one-hundred point "grid

quadrat" (Foster et al. 1991) and percent cover of species was determined by the

interception of algae or sessile invertebrates and grid points. Since plots rarely contained

more than one layer, these analyses were assumed to estimate accurately the total cover of

algae in plots (Foster et al. 1991). Additionally, percentage cover was assessed in the field

using a one hundred point plexiglass grid, when conditions such as rain, low light, or

standing water layer precluded use of photography. When a deep sand layer was present in

plots, estimates of percentage cover included only the visible, primary layer of biota not

covered by sand. The data from the five quadrats were summed and averaged to yield

estimates of mean cover at each permanent station on each sampling date. Although

permanent stations were selected in a stratified random manner from existing patterns,

primary component (cluster) analyses were used to demonstrate an intertidal mosaic of

patches with distinct composition. Randomized percentage cover based on February 1989,

1990 data (n=5) from selected permanent stations (n=lO) were arranged (clustered)

according to similarity using a Systat© clustering program. Cluster analyses were used to

detect distinct spatial patterns and identify relationships between sites.

Herbivore densities were sampled on sand-influenced and non-sand influenced

rocky benches at the Waddell Bluffs site. I hypothesized that the abundance and diversity

of invertebrate grazers in sand-inf1uenced areas would be less than in areas without

seasonal sand inundation. Non-sand inf1uenced outcrops (protected from deposition by

nearshore pinnacles) were near benches exposed to fluctuating sand levels. Abundance of

invertebrate grazers was quantified in sixty random 10 cm2 quadrats placed along 50 m

7

Page 18: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

horizontal transects, parallel to shore, at three separate tidal elevations of @ -O.lm, + 1.4m,

and 2.5m (n=20 quadrats at each elevation) at each area. Placements of horizontal transects

were determined from random points off a single transect running from the upper to lower

intertidal. Data from separate elevations were pooled for analyses, since questions

concerned only species composition, not stratification. Areas were sampled twice, in

August (burial period) 1990 and December (scour period) 1990. Animals were not

excavated in areas with deep sediment (> 10 em) accumulation, but were assumed to be

dead or absent (Daly and Mathieson 1977; Barry 1988; Marshall and McQuaid 1989).

Therefore, these areas were not included in analyses and indicated in results as "nd" (no

data). Barnacle (Balanus glandula) cover was also measured within the above 10 cm2

quadrats using a one-hundred evenly spaced point grid.

Field Experiments

Artificial Clearing

Experimental plots were denuded of plants and animals to document colonization

patterns within different assemblage patches. I proposed that clearings created during a

season other than the scour period may be colonized by species different from those that

recolonize after the natural scour disturbance. Experimental units were 1m2, an area large

enough to avoid marked edge effects (De Vogelaere 1987). Cleared plots were established

in the Polysiphonia pacifica assemblage (n=6), multispecies red and brown algal

assemblage (n=6), and the Ulva sp. assemblage (n=4) at Waddell Bluffs.

Areas were cleared by scraping with a wire brush, then burnt with a propane torch

to eliminate potential regrowth from remaining spores or vegetative material (see Dayton

1971; Emerson and ZecHer 1978; De Vogelaere 1987; Farrell 1989). Plots were marked

permanently with splash zone epoxy-putty and by measured distances to fixed natural

markers. Each treatment was censused bimonthly for percent cover of recruiting algae

using a O.Sm2 one-hundred point plexiglass grid centered in the plots to avoid edge effects.

8

Page 19: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

The condition of surrounding species was assessed qualitatively to help in the evaluation of

patch recovery (i.e., death because of treatment stress). Species lists were made of all

organisms surrounding the treatment plots, species removed from the plots (not necessarily

the same), and those which colonized the plots following manipulation. The experiments

ran from February 1990 when there was limited available space to May 1990 when sand

began to accumulate in the plots.

Transplant/ Translocation Experiment

A reciprocal transplant experiment was conducted at Waddell Beach from June­

November 1991 to test the relative survivorship of algae under varied levels of sand

deposition. I hypothesized that species representative of high and low sand environments

would have different survivorship if transplanted into the opposite characteristic habitat.

Algae representative of areas with low (Polysiplwnia pacifica) and high (Mastocarpus

papillatus) sediment depth (see Results) were reciprocally transplanted to plots within

marked algal patches (Figure 3). Samples of M. papillatus were transplanted to three areas

characteristic of low sediment inundation, whereas, P. pacifica was transplanted to three

areas characteristic of high sediment deposition. Transplanted algae of both species were

taken from surrogate algal patches with the assumption that all algae of those species were

genetically equivalent within that intertidal site. Plant samples used were also chosen from

surrogate patches that had experienced a similar history of sand exposure. Sites had little

or no sand cover during the initial transplantation period. Transplant areas were marked

with 0.3 m and 1 m lengths of steel rebar; individual transplants were marked with 4 em

pieces of PVC, coded with patch number, replicate, and treatment type. Pieces of shale

rock with attached algae were removed using a chisel, transported to experimental recipient

patches (n=6) in a plastic tub filled with natural seawater, and glued onto the recipient shale

with z-spar splash zone epoxy-putty (Kop-Coat Marine Group, NJ). Algal replicates were of

approximate equal size. Three transplant treatment levels were used, and are identified by

9

Page 20: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

the algal species bordering the transplant: transplanted algae of each species (different

border), transplanted algae with a 10 centimeter border to eliminate crowding by other algae

in the recipient patch (cleared border), and translocation controls (movement of algae to a

similar, but foreign, patch of habitat) to test for variability due to physical manipulations

(same border). No replacement controls we~e used; however, natural unmanipulated plants

in each recipient patch were qualitatively examined as additional control treatments.

Transplants were placed randomly, with five replicates of each treatment level in each of the

six randomly selected recipient patches. During the period of sand coverage, sand depths

were measured. Selected transplants, marked with rebar stakes, were periodically

uncovered to determine condition of the plants under continuous burial. Three weeks after

transplanting, one marked transplant from each of the treatments (n=3) was examined in

each recipient patch (n=6), then reburied. At 3 months, the same transplants were

uncovered, in addition to a second marked transplant from each treatment (n=3). At this

time, percent cover of P. pacifica was determined using a circular (embroidery ring) point

quadrat strung with knotted fishing line creating 50 points. M. papillatus thalli> 1 em were

also counted at 3 months. Changes in morphology and color were monitored at each

sampling time as well. The transplants were reburied after these periodic observations.

The experiment ended when the benches/ and plots were naturally uncovered by winter

storms.

Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were executed using Mac! ntosh Statview II program and

occasionally by hand using procedures in Winer (1971) and Zar (1984). Initial data were

tested for normality (g-statistic, Zar 1984) and homogeneity of variances (Cochran's test,

Winer 1971). Data violating assumptions were arcsine and log transformed for percent

cover and counts, respectively, to reduce heteroscedasticity and normalize groups.

Transformed data were then retested. Mean sand depth between assemblages were

10

Page 21: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

compared using a single factor (assemblage) analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by

Student-Neuman-Keuls (SNK) multiple comparison test to detect which means were

significantly different

Differences between treatments within recipient patches in transplant experiments

were tested by one-way A]'JOVA. No signi{icant differences were found for either species

within these treatments, so data were pooled between recipient sites and assumptions

retested. Comparisons of M. papillatus survivorship (thallus count) over time were

compared using repeated measures ANOVA on pooled data for the initial (t=O) to three

month sampling interval. P. pacifica transplant data cover were found to deviate slightly

from normality in the three-six month interval, however ANOVA is fairly robust for data

with considerable heterogeneity, as long as all n's are equal (Zar 1984). These data did not

deviate severely from assumptions and repeated measures ANOVA was used for analysis

of initial (t=O) to six month data. SNK tests were used for pairwise comparisons in both

experiments when ANOV As demonstrated statistical significance.

Seasonal differences in mollusc density were analyzed with 2-sample independent t­

tests between selected seasons, habitats and sites. Cover of experimentally cleared plots

over time was compared graphically.

11

Page 22: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

RESULTS

Sediment accumulated on intertidal benches at Waddell Bluffs and Scott Creek

during late spring and summer throughout the study (Figure 4) by reduced surf and

subsequent shoreward transport of sand. High sand cover persisted until early fall when

large storms moved the sediment into the nearshore environment. The relative accretion

and abatement of beach materials between successive profiles reflected the well-known

seasonal relationship between apparent strength of wave activity and beach erosion and

formation (Shepard 1950; Ingle 1966; and Davis and Ethington 1976). Seasonal

deposition of sediment created a temporary beach in the upper intertidal during summer

months (seasonally ranging from 10.6-6.1 ft above MLLW) which harbored several motile

invertebrate species absent from the site in winter when the beach was absent (unpublished

data). A cobble substrate was exposed during winter months.

Species Composition in Intertidal Mosaics

Assemblages of algae and sessile invertebrates on intertidal benches were

distributed in a mosaic of four well-defined community patches characterized by

Polysiphonia pacifica (Hollenberg); an assemblage containing species of the genus Viva

(hereafter Ulva sp.) including U. taenia/a (Setchell), U. Iobato (Klitz) and U. angus/a

(Setchell & Gardner); Antlwpleura elegantissima (Brandt); or a mixed group of fleshy red

and brown algae (hereafter called Red-Brown) dominated by Mastocarpus papillatus (J.

Agardh) but including Mazzael/a splendens (Setchell & Gardner), Mastocarpus jardinii

(Setchell & Gardner), and Pelvetia Jastigiata (J. Agardh). Cluster analysis revealed the

presence of four distinctive quadrat groups characterized by their cover dominants (Figure

5). The large euclidean distance between main cluster linkages indicated that groupings

were from assemblages that were distinctly dissimilar to one another in total species

composition. Each patch type occurred over a range of tidal elevations (Table 2), but was

significantly related to a distinct pattern along a statistically significant gradient of sand

12

Page 23: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

burial and exposure (single factor ANOVA, p<.001; Table 3). Sand depths characterizing

the A. elegantissima and P. pacifica habitats were found not significantly different (q=0.47;

SNK q.os, z=0.96). No strong correlation was found between sand depth and sand cover

at Waddell Bluffs (n=126, r= 0.014) or Scott Creek (n=56, r= 0.138).

Sediment Influence on Species Composition and Cover

Community type changed dramatically over a relatively short spatial gradient with

change in the depth of seasonal burial by sand. Ulva habitats had a maximum of about 70

em of sand and were bare only for a few winter months when they were colonized (Figure

6) by weedy species, especially Ulva sp. and Porphyra sp. (not shown). Visual cover of

Ulva sp. was greatest when sand depth was less than 8 em. Cover was not known when

sand depth exceeded this level (nd). Any measurement of mean algal cover or large

standard deviation in months of high sediment thickness were likely due to depth

measurements taken outside of the percentage cover quadrats (Figure 6). The substrate

was not entirely uniform (Figure 2) and had areas with small boulders and narrow crevices

along the shale benches. Measurements from these areas allowed for a certain amount of

variability. For example, in March 1989, Waddell station 6 had high algal cover (-90%)

and relatively high sand thickness (-12 em). Large standard deviations shown in June,

August, and October 1988 at Scott Creek station 3 indicate a visually patchy algal cover

poking through the deep sand layer. Algal cover prior to seasonal scour, indicated by the

question mark(?), was also unknown. Patterns of Ulva sp. seasonal recovery and decline

were very similar between stations. Average yearly sand depth at Waddell station 6 was

twice the depth of Waddell stations 2 and 8, and Scott Creek station 3 (Table 2).

Patches dominated by fleshy red and brown algae generally had thick sediment

accumulation for most of the year. Rocky substrata within this habitat were exposed

slightly longer than in the Ulva sp. assemblages. Only species with an average of >5%

cover during at least one sampling date were included as species characteristic of the Red-

13

Page 24: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Brown assemblage type. Although Figure 7 shows the summed percentage cover of all

species, M. papillatus was usually >80% of total algal cover. Like the Ulva habitat, highest

visual algal cover occurred when the sediment thickness was low or absent. Mean algal

cover was usually high one month after sediments were removed (station 4 and 5), but

sometimes patchy between replicate plots .(station 5). Pre-scour algal cover (?) was

unknown. Plant cover rarely exceeded an average of 50% before a new layer of sand

accumulated in spring.

The Polysiplwnia and A11tlwpleura habitats had the shallowest and most similar

mean sand depths (differed an average of only 2 em) and persistent sand cover year-round

(Table 2; Figures 8, 9). The sand level in the Polysiplwnia patches had an average range of

depth from 10 to nearly 0 em. Cover of Polysiplwnia sp. decreased when sand depth

exceeded 10 em; thalli became discolored quickly and disintegrated when handled (pers.

obs.). Cover of Polysiplwnia was highly variable but greater than 40% for most of the year

(Figure 8). Reasons for the decline in cover at station 9 (June) is unknown; however, the

Polysiplwnia was replaced by an abundant cover of small Phyllospadix sp.

The Allthopleura habitat also exhibited high seasonal variability in both sediment

depth and anemone cover (Figure 9), and patterns were not as evident as in the other

habitats. A. elegantissima were not found in plots where sand depths exceeded an average

of 9 em (see Discussion). In some surveys, anemone cover was quantitatively low,

although animals may have been covered by elevated sand levels and not counted in quadrat

point contacts. During summer, and occasionally in winter, anemones were commonly

associated with small patches of the psammophyllic (D'Antonio 1986) alga Neorhodomela

larix.

Clearing Experiments

Rates of recovery within experimental clearings varied considerably between the

three assemblage types. In general, the species of algae surrounding cleared plots

14

Page 25: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

recolonized the open space rapidly. Surprisingly, cleared plots did not accumulate large

amounts of sand which may affect recruitment. Diatoms and an Enteromorpha-diatom

complex, found only in shallow depressions in the shale rock, invaded Ulva sp. and Red­

Brown algal plots (fable 4) immediately following clearing as shown in other studies

(Connell 1972; De Vogelaere 1987; Emerso? and Zedler 1978). Enteromorpha-diatom

cover decreased to nearly 0 in plots after 6 weeks as the abundance other species increased.

No diatoms were observed in plots cleared in Polysiphonia patches.

Ulva sp. colonized cleared space in the Ulva sp. and Polysiplwnia patches within 3

weeks of removal, but became abundant only in plots surrounded by Ulva (fable 4). This

opportunistic alga recruited to plots two weeks after the initial clearing and attained nearly

100% cover after 9 weeks. Polysiplwnia also recruited rapidly to the Ulva sp. clearings,

but percentage cover reached only 8.7% at 2 months, then declined (fable 4).

Polysiplwnia recolonized clearings made within Polysiplwnia habitat after 1.5

months, and reached nearly one hundred percent cover within 4 months. Ulva sp. was

also present in low abundance in these plots. However, as Polysiphonia became

established, Ulva cover decreased (fable 4). These results suggest that facilitative

succession was not an important process in recolonizing manipulated plots within the

Polysiplwnia clearings.

Mastocarpus jardinii (x =12.6%), Mazzaella splendens (9.8%), Mastocarpus

papillatus (49.9%), Fucus gardneri (4.5%) and Pelvetiajastigiata (14.1%) were present in

pre-removal plots in the Red-Brown algal habitat (fable 4). Growth in these plots

resembled a scattered turf of small red blades. The "Petrocelis-stage" of Mastocarpus was

not found in experimental plots at any sampling date. Juvenile brown algae were also

present, but were less abundant throughout sampling periods than reds. Red algae in these

plots, approached a cover of nearly SO% within about 4 months. Mean cover of browns

reached a peak of 13.6% after 3 months. Sand accumulation in plots at this time was <1

em. Percentage cover of unmanipulated, natural adult populations of brown and red algae,

15

Page 26: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

especially M. papillatus, was typically similar to that in cleared plots by the end of the

experiment (see Figure 7). Measurements after May 13 were inhibited by sand

accumulation in the plots.

The anemone habitat was not cleared experimentally due to unsuccessful attempts to

remove pedal discs from the rock substrate .• Anemone body tissue also retained enormous

amounts of seawater which made clearing the substrate with the propane torch impossible.

Reciprocal Transplants

The effects of sand on algal survivorship (number of thalli or cover remaining)

were dramatic. Results indicated that Mastocarpus was more tolerant of sand burial up to 3

months (12 weeks), especially at deep depths, than Polysiphonia. Low sand environments

sustained high cover and thallus number for Polysiplwnia and Mastocarpus, respectively.

Comparisons of initial transplants (t=O) with the final sampling (t=6 months) show the

dramatic change in plant abundance in Mastocarpus recipient patches due to localized

seasonal scour (Table Sa). Transplants within Polysiplzonia recipient patches showed only

slight decrease in abundance from initial to final sampling times. Thallus abundance and

percentage cover did not vary significantly between replicate border treatments (ANOVA,

p>.05) between recipient patches (Table 6a) so these data were later pooled in analyses.

Maslocarpus thallus number decreased slightly (x=2.1, sJ3=0.54 at t=3 months)

when transplanted into Polysiphonia (low sand) patches. Despite loss of thalli, plants

appeared healthy and in good condition over time (pers. obs.). Selected transplant controls

of Mastocarpus lost an average of 1.83 (sE=0.31) thalli after 3 months of burial. In

contrast, Mastocarpus transplant controls after 6 months decreased to zero. Mastocarpus

habitats appear to be naturally cleared (see Discussion-Assemblage Pattem) of existing

biota from winter sand scour. There was no significant difference between M. papillatus

transplants with and without bare rock borders (ANOVA, p>.05; Table 6b). This may

indicate that any change in thallus number over time was not due to crowding (intraspecific

16

Page 27: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

algal border) or instability (10 em cleared border). Mastocarpus survivorship (98%) of

selected plants was significantly higher than Polysiplwnia under 3 months of deep sediment

burial (up to 64.6 em of sand). Standard errors for transplants in low sand habitats were

high due to the loss of two M. papillatus transplants between the 3 week and 3 month

interval. Plants were not measured betwef;I1 3 and 6 months after burial, therefore their

condition during this interim could not be ascertained.

Polysiplwnia transplanted into control patches showed no significant change in

percentage cover over time. There were statistical differences (F=0.23; p<.05) between

transplants with and without cleared borders at all sampling times. During the 0-3 month

interval, percent cover in control patches decreased 1.8% (sE=0.54). Plant cover decreased

an additional 1.4% (sE=0.41) under 6 months of burial. Selected transplants of

Polysiplwnia (n=6) into high sand environments died quickly after 3 weeks of burial and

cover decreased about 77 percent; sand depths at this time exceeded 23.6 em (Table Sb).

Sand accumulation in transplant plots was consistent with average depths recorded

previously in these habitats (Figure 4). Benches were covered with as much as 64.6 em of

sediment 3 weeks after the transplantation experiments were initiated.

Herbivore Densities

Densities of molluscs and barnacles (Table 7) were extremely low (< 14.5 per m2)

in areas of high sediment accumulation. Species coin position was similar between Waddell

and Scott Creek with the exception of Loltia limatula, which was absent in all Waddell

samples. Average sediment deptl1 at the time of sampling in August was 40.1 em and 0.83

em in December.

There was significant difference in mollusc abundance between winter samples over

all areas (Table 8). The difference in invertebrate density during the summer months was

obviously confounded by the presence of sand. In areas affected by seasonal sand burial,

the intertidal periwinkle, littorina keenae, was found on algal thalli and not on bare rock or

17

Page 28: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

sand. These gastropods were significantly more abundant overnll (increase of 24% and

42% for Waddell Beach and Scott Creek sites, respectively) in the winter months when

sand was absent (2-sample independent Hest, p>.05). Other species were not recorded at

sand influenced sites in August, however, these areas were not completely unburied to

assess presence of animals beneath the sand-layer.

Juvenile barnacles recruited to available bare rock in the winter months when the

benches were clear of sediment Mean barnacle cover was greater on benches not affected

by deposited sediment and covered about 28% at the time of sampling (Table 7). Barnacles

were likely absent on sand-influenced sites in the summer months, as suggested by the

absence of adult or large barnacle tests on sand-swept rocks at surveyed sites during sand

subsidence. Winter cover was significantly greater on benches without sand-influence at

Waddell Bluffs (t=8.18, t.os=1.67, p<.OS) and greater on sand-influenced benches at Scott

Creek (t=2.90). The peak brooding season of Balanus glandula in this region (Hines

1978) coincides with the period of minimal sand accumulation at this site. Both juvenile

and adults comprised barnacle cover in non-sand areas.

Mussels were completely absent at sand disturbed sites (pers. obs.). Apparently,

they require several seasons to become established and fully developed

(Stephenson and Stephenson 1977) which would not be possible where disturbance was

frequent.

18

Page 29: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

DISCUSSION

General Patterns

The results of this study demonstrate that sand burial may be an important

component in the local, small scale distribution of several species at Waddell Bluffs and

Scott Creek. Variation in i:he mosaic structfire of the intertidal communities studied was

strongly associated with changes in sediment-related parameters. Thus, even though other

biological and physical processes (e.g., competitive interactions, wave exposure, substrate

availability and type, desiccation, insolation, grazing) may have influenced community

structure, effects of sedimentation appeared to predominate over the spatial and temporal

scales relevant to this study. The distinct intertidal mosaic is certainly correlated with a

natural sediment gradient; but the actual effect of sand on assemblage distribution can only

be speculated from the provided data. Littler et al. (1983) also attributed patterns of

distribution and abundance for several intertidal species to varying degrees of seasonal sand

stress as cover; while the persistence of some perennial species have been shown to be a

consequence of adaptation to sediment movement (Stewart 1983). In general, the

distribution of macroalgae and sessile invertebrates was correlated with the intensity of

seasonal sediment accumulation (i.e., depth and duration of sediment burial).

No significant correlations were found between distance from high tide markers and

tidal elevation, or distance and assemblage composition. The lack of correlation between

tidal elevation and mean sand depth (r-=0.018) indicate that areas of high elevation are not

necessarily those with the least amount of sediment accumulation. Littler et al. (1983)

noted a negative correlation between tidal height and percent sand cover of adjacent

sampling sites. In all likelihood, however, patterns of distribution reflect responses to both

elevation and degree of sediment influence.

Community patches had distinct species compositions and were not simply

midpoints along a horizontal gradient of species (e.g., classification analyses, Figure 5).

Although patch persistence was not measured, I did not observe large scale increases or

19

Page 30: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

decreases in the borders of patches. Station observations and examination of photographs

from adjacent cliff overlooks show that patches remained relatively constant in size

throughout the study (some as large as 30m2 diameter). Also, species composition within

patches remained seasonally consistent over the several years of this study.

Reduced surf and longshore curr(!nts result in seasonal transport of sand from

adjacent permanent beaches to the rocky terraces at each study area. Nearshore surface

currents along the coast near Davenport run generally from north to south; however,

upwelling, strong local wind patterns and eddies off Aiio Nuevo Point (Schwing et al.

1991) create complex surface currents which occasionally deflect surface water towards the

coast (Griggs 1974) that may promote transport and deposition of sediment into the

intertidal areas. The burial period was temporally consistent from year to year, but the

removal of sand was dependent on the first series of winter storms and was somewhat

variable over successive years.

Several studies have shown decreased biotic diversity associated with sand­

influenced rocky intertidal habitat (Stephenson and Stephenson 1972; Daly and Mathieson

1977; Rogers 1990). Species living in this fluctuating habitat must be adapted to

temporally predictable disturbances and take advantage of periods of favorable conditions

(i.e., sand subsidence) for growth and reproduction. uttler et al. (1983) refer to these

habitats as "refuges" for opportunistic and psammophyllic species. Under conditions of

extreme sediment disturbance, communities should be composed mainly of few species and

low diversity overall (Seapy and uttler 1982). Mathieson (1982) found that areas buried

greater than 7-8 months per year had few species. According to Rogers (1990), areas with

heavy sedimentation would have "lower species diversity and percent cover, greater

abundance of forms and species with resistance to sediment smothering, and an upward

shift [in zonation]" relative to those areas of less deposition. Alternate views in subtidal

(Foster 1975) and other intertidal (Sousa 1979; Paine and Levin 1981) habitats associate

sand scour with increased species diversity. At my study sites, the diversity of dominant

20

Page 31: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

species was low as opposed to non-sand influenced areas where qualitative observations

indicate greater diversity. Moreover, nearby areas of similar tidal elevation, but protected

from seasonal sand burial, were occupied mainly by algae different from those in sand­

influenced sites. These conflicting results in the literature appear related to the scale

observed and the degree in which the effec.ts of sedimentation contribute to the physical

heterogeneity of the habitats studied.

Assemblage Patterns

Variation between mosaic intertidal habitats was examined in order to assess the

association of physical and biological parameters concurrently. Intertidal surveys using

combination methods of visual estimation and photographic documentation have been

shown effective in estimating cover of biota (Meese and Tomich 1992). However, in some

instances, 3-dimensional estimation of biotic cover was impeded by increasing sand cover

at permanent stations ("nd": Figures 6 and 7).

Two opportunistic species dominated habitats characterized by intermediate sand

burial. Ulva sp. colonized bare rock within weeks after it was uncovered. Porphyra sp.

was not very common at sampled stations (pers. obs.), but resulted in underestimation of

the cover of Ulva in photoquadrats when present since it was usually found on top of the

Ulva layer. The short period of exposure in the habitat(- 3 months) presumably prevented

establishment of species that grow slowly. Accumulation of sediments in spring, in all

probability, killed the remaining Ulva. Laboratory analyses of Ulva under 20 em of sand

indicated high to total mortality after 1 month burial (D'Antonio 1986). At station Waddell

2, the dashed line from November to December indicates the unknown cover of Ulva sp.

before the December sampling date (Figure 6). I suspect that even if Ulva sp. cover was

>0% during this time, it is unlikely that the plants would have survived the physical

scouring as sand retreated in winter. There was as much as two months between some

sampling dates, so a longer recruitment period between surveys and subsequent high cover

21

Page 32: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

recorded the following month was possible. As stated above, relatively deep sand depth

with high algal cover were due to depth measurements taken outside percent cover

quadrats.

Stations with the Red-Brown algal assemblage experienced longer seasonal bare

substrate exposure than. those with U{va, possibly enabling longer growth and

development, resulting in patches with more species. Abundance of Mazzaella splendens,

Mastocarpus jardinii, Pelvetia fastigiata and Mastocarpus papillatus fluctuated monthly;

however, M. papillatus was greater than so% of the total algal cover at each sampling.

Percentage cover at some sampling dates may have been underestimated due to layering of

some species. M. papillatus is considered the most common and morphologically variable

algal species on the Pacific coast (Abbott and Hollenberg 1976). This phenotypic-plasticity

was evident when comparing non sand-influenced sites to those where sediment was

absent for only 4 to 5 months. Mature Mastocarpus papillatus in sand-influenced areas had

a decreased stature and more bushy appearance compared with nearby plants at non sand­

influenced sites (pers. obs.). Mathieson (1982) noted that growth and reproduction of

species in sand-swept environments were limited to periods of sand subsidence.

Mastocarpus papillatus can respond facultatively to environmental conditions by

either asexual (direct-development of haploid carpospores) or sexual reproduction (Zupan

and West 1988). Modes of algal recovery in naturally or artificially cleared sites in this

study were difficult to identify, since it was possible for adjacent populations to have either

mode of reproduction; from sporophyte (crust) to gametophyte or gametophyte to

gametophyte. It is also revealing to note that the Petrocelis-stage of Mastocarpus was not

found at permanent stations. D'Antonio (1986) suggested that intertidal algae reproducing

sexually must recruit during periods when sand is not present and reach a large enough size

to withstand burial. However, sediment scour alone, rather than burial, may prevent

settling of spores or establishment of germlings (Emerson and Zedler 1978). Red algae

have non-motile spores, and plants may be limited in their ability to disperse and colonize

22

Page 33: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

open space (Hoffmann and Ugarte 1985; Nigg 1988). Daly and Mathieson (1977) suggest

that incomplete life histories may be an advantage in sandy habitats because they would

ensure continued genetic stability. Other literature suggests that sand coverage may limit

algal recruitment, aiding species that can perennate and grow vegetatively (Mathieson 1982;

D'Antonio 1986; Barry 1988; Amsler et al. !992) or from portions of holdfasts remaining

after sand scour (Markham and Newroth 1972; Markham 1973; Zupan and West 1988).

Studies also suggest that some algae can produce small groups of discoid cells (3-4 cells)

prior to seasonal disturbance, such as sand coverage (Mathieson 1982; Zupan and West

1988; Reed, pers. comm.). These cells may be highly resistant to harsh conditions

produced by prolonged burial (e.g., anoxic sediment layer, reduced light). In this study,

the notion that microscopic cells or tissue survive deep burial is supported by the

appearance of very small thalli of red algae shortly after total sand subsidence in winter. It

is not known whether these recruits originated from previously buried tissue or by the rapid

recruitment of spores from adult plants fringing the area. Moreover, the absence of

Pertocelis sp. further augments the presumption of existing algal cells or tissue. Even early

on, Ulva sp. was never found in areas typically dominated by M. papillatus, and it seems

possible that Ulva sp. recruitment was inhibited by the presence of existing species.

Mastocarpus may use this strategy to outcompete other algae (including Ulva) for space

during sand subsidence. Unfortunately, attempts to evaluate this possibility were

inconclusive.

Plant viability was not examined during periods of burial, so it can only be

suggested from depth of sediment at the time of sampling that mature algae in deeply

sedimented areas were indeed negatively affected or absent due to scour. This exposes one

of the problems using measurements of percentage cover from photoquadrats since, unless

modified, this method does not allow for the evaluation of secondary layering. Because

deep sediment cover obscures algae or other species, the presence or absence of buried

species is unknown and likely underestimated. Failure to excavate and examine plants

23

Page 34: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

under heavy summer burial produced the "no data" (nd) shown in Figures 6 and 7. The

viability and reproductive status of these buried plants are essential to evaluate some of the

hypotheses considered. However, even conservative interpretation and results of the

transplant experiments indicate that mortality must have been high under deep sediment

conditions.

Assemblages dominated by Polysiplwnia pacifiCa were typical of areas with low,

but persistent sand cover. This finely branched, turf-forming alga retains sediment,

forming a sediment-algal matrix that may provide greater bed stability (Rawlence and

Taylor 1970; Hay 1981), in addition to creating a more suitable habitat for infaunal

invertebrates. Polysiphonia and Antlwpleura habitats were so similar in their average

sediment depths that the principle factor influencing their distribution may have been

elevation.

Alztlwpleura elegantissima can withstand shallow sand burial by elongation of its

column to extend above the sand layer (Taylor and Littler 1982; Pineda and Escofet 1989).

Studies have shown that the solitary form of A. elegantissima does better in heavily sand­

influenced environments and can survive burial >3 months (Sebens 1980). The clonal

form dominated sampling areas of this study. Although clonal aggregation reduces

desiccation stress, it may limit the distribution of the anemones to areas less inundated with

sediments. Clonal anemones are less mobile and tended to be found in areas where sand

levels did not exceed 9 em. They are tolerant to some complete burial (as indicated by

results in Figure 9), but typically at depths shallower and durations less than those shown

during this study. At deeper depths the smaller (clonal form) anemones could not elongate

the column sufficiently to bring the oral disc above the sand surface (Pineda and Escofet

1989). Dayton (1971) tested the hypothesis that desiccation set distributional limits on A.

elegantissima. He transplanted animals outside their range in Puget Sound and found that

animals survived well in winter, but not in spring when low tides moved to daytime hours.

Anemones at Waddell and Scotts Creek did not appear to suffer desiccation stress even

24

Page 35: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

though they were subjected to afternoon low tides in winter when there was little or no

sand.

Algal Translocation

Results of the transplant experiment .suggest that Polysiplwnia pacifica is intolerant

of high sediment accumulation and thus its distribution may be restricted to sites with

shallow sediment depths. Survivorship results and observations of Mastocarpus papillatus

suggest that its distribution in the study areas is independent of effects from seasonal

sediment accumulation. Other field transplant studies demonstrate variability in the

tolerance of algae to sediment burial. Markham (1972) transplanted Gymnogongrus

linearis to areas of variable wave exposure and sediment accumulation and found the plants

to be tolerant of heavy sand burial and abrasion. Markham (1973) found also that growth

rate and dominance of Laminaria sinclairii was higher in areas where sand burial was the

greatest. Mathieson (1982) documented high survivorship of Plweostrophion irreulare

transplants in sandy areas, but only if surrounding algae were removed. Transplanting

species into patches of dissimilar species did not significantly affect the translocated algae

(Table 6b) within the duration of this study. The general appearance and morphology of

buried plants that had not been experimentally manipulated were compared to transplant

control plants, but no actual measurements were made of these unmanipulated plants.

These evaluations were especially important for M. papillatus transplants which were

heavily buried (>23 em) after 3 weeks. The undisturbed controls were similar to those of

transplanted algae, so I assumed that the transplanting procedure had minimal negative

effect (Figure 4a). Properly designed controls would have included replacing removed

plants to their original locations. Regardless, plants did not seem to be affected by the

transplant procedure- which the additional controls would have tested. A few M. papillatus

plants appeared slightly bleached or orange after 3 months, but little tissue loss was

apparent.

25

Page 36: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Some species may require particular intensities of disturbance (Paine and Levin

1981) and adaptations to chronic disturbances can occur where species become dependent

on predictable perturbations (Dethier 1984). The persistence of Mastocarpus in areas of

heavy sediment inundation may indicate that plants are tolerant of prolonged burial and

repeated sand abrasion. O'Antonio (1986). tested the tolerance of several macroa!gae to

sand burial in the lab and found a definite gradient among species. Mastocarpus papillatus

plants in her lab experiments survived well under 20 em of sand after 1 month, having only

lost reproductive papillae, but lost nearly all tissue after 3 months. At my sites, loss of M.

papillatus thalli was minimal under >50 em of sand after 3 months. D'Antonio (1986)

suggested also that sand may also be linked to the development and persistence of

Neorhodomela larix, another psammophyllic species. In the field, she found that natural

populations of N.larix suffered little damage and remained reproductive under 40 em burial

after 2 weeks. Survival of transplanted Mastocarpus after 6 months was zero due to the

seasonal scouring of rocky benches (Figure 2). However, data concerning Mastocarpus

survival shown in Table Sa may be somewhat misleading since it is quite possible that

plants were not entirely dead and tiny bits of viable tissue remained on the shale rock (see

Assemblage Patter/IS).

Survivorship was defined in my study as the number of thalli or percentage cover

of plants remaining at subsequent sampling periods. Initial numbers of M. papillatus and

percentage cover of P. pacifica were defined to equal 100% survival. Polysiphonla

transplanted in a similar patch type with a shallow sand layer had high survivorship

throughout the sampling period and did not appear to differ from the in situ (non­

transplanted) plants. Higher mortality of P. pacifica transplanted to M. papillatus habitats

with cleared borders versus no border, was likely related to the destabilization of the

sediment-alga! matrix by wave action. Although deep sand layers had no strong anoxic

smell or dark black color during the course of the experiment I assumed that oxygen and

light levels were lower and contributed to decreased survivorship. D'Antonio's (1986)

26

Page 37: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

laboratory examination of Cryptosiphonia woodii (morphologically similar to

Polysiplwnia) demonstrated severe reductions in plant tissue after I month under 15-20 em

sand. Nevertheless, her controls indicate that plant reductions may have been due to

transplant procedures.

Subtidal studies have shown that sand burial can have detrimental effects on

gametophytes through reduced light and reduced gas exchange (Devinny and Valse 1978).

Perennial plants growing in this environment must be adapted to extreme reductions in light

intensity. Even a very thin layer of sediment will reduce light penetration. For example,

Shaughnessy (1986) found a decrease in light level from 627 uE m-2 s-1 (surface

irradiance) to 5 uE m-2 s-1 with a 3 mm sand overlay, and to 0 uE m-2 s-1 under 6 mm

depth. Grain size in the Shaughnessy study was very coarse (0.4-0.8 mm) compared to

the finer sediments at Waddell and Scott Creek (Table 9), so I assume there was little or no

light transmittance under any significant cover of sediment (>0.5 mm) in this study.

Clearing Experiment

Experimental clearings have been used in several studies of succession (Emerson

and Zedler 1978; Foster 1975; DeVogelaere 1987; Farrell 1988), species' distribution

(Marks 1974; Denslow 1980; Foster 1982), competitive interactions (Barry 1988; Gill and

Marks 1991), and grazer effects (Robles 1982). Clearing experiments were employed to

determine if mosaic patterns reflected reproductive time scale (i.e., spore availability) or

tolerance to sediment-related disturbance. I hypothesized that Ulva sp. would colonize

most or all cleared plots, thus dominate initially during any successional sequence,

regardless of the timing of a disturbance. Results in this study indicated that recovery by

dominant species was rapid during the season clearings were created, but not predictably

limited to early successional species. Littler et al. (1983) also recorded rapid recovery of

plots cleared during winter, and noted that predominant species recovered within 5-6

months. Artificial clearings created during different seasons can lead to different sequences

27

Page 38: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

of algal colonizers (Emerson and Zedler 1978; Denslow 1980). Vlva sp. in this study

recolonized available space as the primary successional stage as shown in other

colonization studies (Sousa 1979; Littler 1979; Davis and Wilce 1987; De Vogelaere 1987;

Foster et ai. 1988; Farrell 1989). Viva sp. even recolonized clearings in the Red-Brown

algal patches, although Viva sp. was never found in these areas during previous surveys.

Previous studies by Connell ( 1972) and Sousa (1984) reported that succession proceeds

from bacteria and diatoms to ephemeral green algae, and finally to perennial algae (usually

reds and browns), which persist following colonization. In my clearings diatoms were

present in low abundance. Primary colonizers varied from plot to plot, and there is little

evidence that any of the dominant algae at the sites required the presence of another species

for establishment Connell (1972) suggested that changes result from different breeding

seasons, differential motility of spores, and/or different growth rates. Therefore, failure of

an alga to recolonize a plot after clearing, may be related to the lack of propagules due to the

timing of the reproductive season, even if it was present initially. Some algae may colonize

exposed areas quickly because the surrounding undisturbed area is a source of recruits for

those species (Sousa 1979; Denslow 1980; DeVogelaere 1987). It is also possible that

species rejuvenated from spores that persisted because of insufficient burning techniques.

Emerson and Zedler (1978) noted that the initial invasion by diatoms was followed by

colonization of Enteromorpha flexnosa and Vlva rig ida 2 weeks after disturbance, similar

to my plots cleared in winter. In Polysiplwnia-removai plots (Table 4), Vlva showed a

decline following its peak abundance on March 9, which suggests an inability to maintain

dominance in a site once another species (Polysiphonia) became established. As reds

became dominant in some plots (Table 4), they in turn may have inhibited the reinvasion by

early successional species (Emerson and Zedler 1978). I'm not convinced, however, that

the decline of the Enteromorpha-diatom complex was due to increase of other algae, since it

was invariably restricted to shallow depressions of the rocky benches. Desiccation may

have been the controlling factor for its later absence.

28

Page 39: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

The dispersal range for adult red and brown algae, common to late successional

stages, (Dayton 1973; Sousa 1984) may have had a strong affect on offspring recruitment

to experimental patches. Results indicated that the recovery of experimentally cleared plots

was similar to the dominant algae surrounding each plot. However, at the early stages of

recovery juvenile red and brown algae were .difficult to identify accurately. In this study,

the huge standard error in algal cover (Table 4) indicates patchy recruitment to the clearings

and variability between replicate plots. Colonization in these sediment disturbed areas may

have been influenced strongly by the local availability of propagules and, perhaps, by the

short dispersal ranges of spores. Sousa (1984) related short distance dispersal of

propagules to high abundance of recruits (demonstrated by percent cover of juveniles)

surrounded by high numbers of adult plants. Contrary to this idea, DeAngelis et al. (1979)

noted that recovery of a patch from a nearby spore source was independent of the actual

size of the source patch and was dependent only on the fact that the species existed in the

source patch. If spore dispersal is limited to short distances, as some literature suggests,

then the rapid colonization of red and brown algae to plots would indicate that the

surrounding adults were reproductive at the time of experimental clearing. These results, in

turn, echo other studies (Daly and Mathieson 1977; D'Antonio 1986; Rogers 1990)

indicating that species in areas with temporally predictable disturbances (i.e., seasonal)

should have rapid recruitment and growth. In Red-Brown algal plots, clearings were made

in late winter. Because M. papillatus is reproductive all year with a winter peak (Northcraft

1948), spores were available for recolonization of cleared plots. M. papillntus and the

fucoid Pelvetiopsis have been shown to appear first in plots cleared during winter. In

central California, Sousa (1984) found that M. papillatus reached about 6% cover 2 months

after clearing. Pelvetia fastigiata is reproductive from winter through spring (Gunnill

1980), while Mazzaelln splendens has perennial holdfasts and annual blades. Blades grow

in late winter, reach maximum size in mid-summer, and reproduce and senesce during fall

(Foster et al. 1988). M. splendens was less common at the tidal elevations of the

29

Page 40: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

permanent stations, and would be less likely to recolonize cleared plots. Although the

reproductive status of adults surrounding the plots was not determined, proximity of spore

sources in known to affect recruitment patterns of intertidal algae (Dayton 1973; DeAngelis

et al. 1979; Sousa 1979; Denslow 1980; Sousa 1984; DeVogelaere 1987) and is

undoubtedly important in this study.

Although clearings in the anemone patch type were unfortunately not possible, it

has been documented that removal of A. elegantissima beds provides space for algal

recruits (Taylor and Littler 1982). Apparently, algae associated with anemone beds are

dependent on the beds water-retaining capabilities, and decrease when anemone patches are

removed. Although patches of anemones are commonly associated with sediments,

recruitment to available space by Allllwpleura can be inhibited by sediment abrasion (Barry

1988).

Benthic Invertebrates

Sand accumulation plays an important role in the distribution and abundance of

benthic invertebrates at the surveyed sites. Species diversity on rocky benches without

seasonal sand burial of this study was not as high as that reported for similar habitats.

!Jttler et al. ( 1983) reported that Tegula jwzebralis, Collisela scabra, Lottia gigantea, and

Alztlwpleura elegantissima inhabited areas with minimal (<8.8%) sand cover. Although T.

fimebralis migrates away from heavy sediment deposition (!Jttler et al. 1983; D'Antonio

1986), it is known to be a sand-tolerant species which commonly occurs in clonal

aggregations of Antlwpleura elegalllissima (Francis 1973). T. fimebralis was not found in

sand-influenced areas in this study, although it was the dominant gastropod in nearby

similar habitats without seasonal sand cover (Table 7). The mossy chiton Mopalia mucosa,

and marine polychaetes Phragmatopoma califomica and Sabellaria sp. are also tolerant of

moderate sand burial (Francis 1973), but were absent from sand-stressed areas. The

gastropod l.ittorina keenae accounted for 42% of the molluscan grazers in non-sand areas

30

Page 41: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

and 100% in sand-impacted areas (Table 7). L. keenae was the only grazer present at all

sites in the winter and found strictly on Neorhodomela larix and Polysiplwnia pacifica

plants. Five of the 9 numerically dominant invertebrates counted at all sites were limpets.

A laboratory study by Barry (1988) showed mortality oflimpets and chi tons buried in 2 em

of sand to be 100% after 5 days. Marshall i).lld McQuaid (1989) also found that patellid

limpets did not survive more than 3 days under 15 em of sand due to reduced oxygen

tension. The absence of benthic invertebrates at any sand-influenced station suggests their

intense intolerance even moderate sand accumulation. However, as previously noted, areas

with elevated sand levels were not cleared to determine the presence of live animals beneath

sediments. The relative lack of grazers in my results also indicates that herbivory exerted

little or no influence on the structure of the algal community of these sand-influenced

habitats. However, it is important to note that completely different invertebrate

communities may exist at these sites during high tide, and that these communities may be

influencing algal community patterns.

Sand may have a negative effect on the larval or juvenile stages of invertebrates,

and may dramatically inhibit recruitment in habitats that accumulate a sediment layer

(D'Antonio 1986; Barry 1988). The presence of young barnacles at Waddell and Scott

Creek (Table 5) suggests that although the potential for recruitment may be high, the sand

disturbance inhibits settlement or results in high juvenile mortality or both. The presence of

sand in the intertidal can also modify vertical zonation and the distribution of some

barnacles and mussels has been set by the physical smothering action of sand (Littler 1983)

rather than by biological factors. Frank (1966), Daly and Mathieson (1977), and Littler

(1983) have also noted that the lower limits of limpets, mussels and barnacles have been set

by the seasonal level of sand burial.

Rocky Shore-Sandy Beach Ecotone

Results of my study provide some additional insight into the association between intertidal

31

Page 42: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

community mosaics and sand burial. Although direct evidence of the influence of sand on

biotic distribution is limited in this and other studies, and many conclusions about its affect

on community structure are speculative; these data effectively illustrate the attributes

comprised by inhabitants of areas disturbed by seasonal sedimentation. Species within

sand-swept rocky intertidal. environments cap be defined as ruderal strategists or species

adapted to make use of disturbed habitats (Grime 1977). Plants and animals in sand­

impacted habitats must have adaptations, such as abrasion-resistant morphologies,

opportunistic life histories, and rapid growth that allow them to outcompete other species

for resources in these areas. Results of experimental clearings and natural seasonal patterns

support these notions, where opportunistic and, seemingly, psammophyllic species

dominated. Opportunistic forms have been defined as rapid colonizers, ephemerals, or

perennials with vegetative short-cuts to their life history. However, some species

considered to be late successional, (e.g., red and brown algae), have young thalli

possessing characteristics that parallel opportunistic forms (e.g., Mastocarpus papillatus:

Littler and Littler 1980). Persistence of these communities require specialized growth and

morphological characteristics and/or reproductive patterns that allow recolonization

following seasonal disturbance by sand inundation. The rapid appearance of small red

thalli in study areas following seasonal sand subsidence suggests that these habitats may be

occupied by algal species which utilize an asexual (vegetative) form of colonization. Patch

occupancy will be detem1ined at least initially over ecological time scales by the season of

disturbance [birth of the space] and the local availability of propagules (Paine and Levin

1981). The reverse, that reproductive strategy and season are determined by the probability

of space being available for recruitment (Whittaker and Levin 1977; Emerson and Zedler

1978; Sousa 1979; Littler et al. 1980; Hoffmann and Ugarte 1985), also appears to be true

and likely develops over evolutionary time scales. In habitats studied here, the ability to

dominate areas where other species cannot tolerate the intensity of the disturbance can be

quite beneficial. Perhaps this is supported, in part, by the results of reciprocal transplant

32

Page 43: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

experiment where high survival was determined by position within the sediment gradient.

Species' persistence may be controlled by both limited dispersal (short-term) and tolerance

to burial depth creating different microhabitat characteristics (long-term). Daly and

Mathieson (1977) suggest that the historical sequences of sand inundation determine the

zonation of species, and that reproduction and growth are necessarily synchronized with

seasonal sediment subsidence. Do the distributional patterns of biota in this study reflect

the response of species to variation in sediment distribution? Although speculative, a

simple answer may be, if microhabitats differ in physical properties, such as sand depth,

then sand can define the areas in which the microhabitats, and subsequent associated biota,

may be dispersed. Variation in sediment depth differs according to microhabitat variation

in physical processes, leading to physically defined patch boundaries that are later occupied

(e.g., colonized and/or tolerated) by appropriate species.

33

Page 44: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

LITERATURE CITED

Abbott, I.A. and G.J. Hollenberg. 1976. Marine ~ cl California. Stanford Univ.

Press, 827 pp.

Amsler, C.D., D.C. Reed and M. Neushul. 1992. The microclimate inhabited by

macroalgal propagules. Brit. Phycol. J. 27: 253-270.

Aubrey, D.G. 1979. Seasonal patterns of onshore/offshore sediment movement. J.

Geophys. Res. 84: 6347-6354.

Barry, J.P. 1988. Pattern and process: Patch dynamics in a rocky intertidal community in

Southern Califomia. Doctoral Dissertation, Scripps Institute of Oceanography,

UCSD, 335pp.

Brawley, S.H. and L.E. Johnson. 1991. Survival of fucoid embryos in the intertidal zone

depends upon developmental stage and microhabitat. J. Phycol. 27: 179-186.

Connell, J.H. 1987. Change and persistence in some marine communities. In,

Colonjzatjon, succession, and stabj!jty. 26th Symp. Brit. Ecol. Soc., pp. 339-352.

A.J. Gray, M.J. Crawley, and P.J. Edwards, eds. Blacbvell Scientific Pub!.,

Oxford.

__ 1972. Community interactions on rocky intertidal shores. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.

3: 169-192.

D'Antonio C. M. 1986. Role of sand in the domination of hard substrata by the intertidal

alga Rhodomela larix. Mar. Ecol. Progr. Ser. 27: 263-275.

Dahl, A. L. 1969. The effect of environment on growth and development of Zonaria

farlowii. Proc. Inti. Seaweed Sym. 6: 123-132.

Daly, M. A. and A. C. Mathieson. 1977. The effects of sand movement on intertidal

seaweeds and selected invertebrates at Bound Rock, New Hampshire, USA. Mar.

Bioi. 43: 45-55.

34

Page 45: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Davis, A. N. and R. T. Wilce. 1987. Algal diversity in relation to physical disturbance: a

mosaic of successional stages in a subtidal cobble habitat Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 37:

229-237.

Davis, J.R. and R.L. Ethington. 1976. ~ l!ill! nearshore sedimentation. Soc. Econ.

Pal eon. Mineral., Spec. Pub!. 24, 187 pp.

Dayton, P. K. 1971. Competition, Disturbance, and Community Organization: The

provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecol.

Monogr. 41: 351-388.

__ 1973. Dispersion, dispersal, and persistance of the annual intertidal algae,

Postelsia palmaeformis Ruprecht. Ecology 54(2): 433-438.

DeAngelis, D.L., C. C. Travis and W.M. Post. 1979. Persistence and stability of seed­

dispersing species in patchy environments. Theor. Pop. Bioi. 16: 107-125.

Denslow, J. S. 1980. Patterns of plant species diversity during succession under different

disturbance regimes. Oecologia 46: 18-21.

Dethier, M. N. 1984. Disturbance and recovery in intertidal pools: Maintenance of mosaic

patterns. Ecol. Monogr. 54(1): 99-118.

__ 1991. The effects of an oil spill and freeze event on intertidal community structure

in Washington. U.S. Dept. Inter., Minerals Manage Ser., MMS 91-0002,33 pp.

Devinny, J.S. and L.A. Valse. 1978. Effects of sediments on the development of

Macrocystis pyrijera gametophytes. Mar. Bioi. 48: 343-348.

De Vogelaere, A. P. 1987. Rocky intertidal patch succession after disturbance: Effects of

severity, size, and position within patch. Masters Thesis, MLMU San Francisco

State Univ.

Emerson, S.E and J.B. Zedler. 1978. Recolonization of intertidal algae: An experimental

study. Mar. Bioi. 44: 315-324.

35

Page 46: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Farrell, T.M. 1989. Succession in a rocky intertidal community: the importance of

disturbance size and position within a disturbed patch. J. Exp. Mar. Bioi. Ecol. 128:

57-73.

___ 1988. Community stability: effects of limpet removal and reintroduction in a rocky

intertidal community. Oecologia 75: 19D-197.

Foster, M.S. 1975. Algal succession in a Macrocystis pyrifera forest. Mar. Bioi. 32:

313-329.

__ 1982. Factors controlling the intertidal zonation of Iridaeaflaccida (Rhodophyta).

J. Phycol. 18: 285-294.

Foster, M.S., A.P. DeVogelaere, C. Harrold, J.S. Pearse and A.B. Thurn. 1988. Causes

of spatial and temporal patterns in rocky intertidal communities of central and

northern California. Mem. Cal. Acad. Sci. 1-45.

Foster, M.S., C. Harrold and D.D. Hardin. 1991. Point vs. photo quadrat estimates of

the cover of sessile marine organisms. J. Exp. Mar. Bioi. Ecol. 146: 193-203.

Francis, L. 1973. Clone specific aggregation in the sea anemone Antlwpleura

elegantissima. Bioi. Bull. Mar. Bioi. Lab, Woods Hole, Mass., 144: 64-72.

Frank, P. W. 1965. The biodemography of an intertidal snail population. Ecology 46:

831-844.

Gibbons, M.J. 1988. The impact of sediment accumulations, relative habitat complexity

and elevation on rocky shore meiofauna. J. Exp. Mar. Bioi. Ecol. 122: 225-241.

Gill, D.S. and P.L. Marks. 1991. Tree and shrub seedling colonization of old fields in

central New York. Ecol. Monogr. 61(2): 183-205.

Griggs, G.B. 1974. Nearshore current patterns along the central California coast. Est.

Coast. Mar. Sci. 2: 395-405.

Grime, J.P. 1977. Evidence for the existence of 3 primary strategies in plants and its

relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am. Nat 111: 1169-1194.

36

Page 47: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Gunnill, F. C. 1980. Demography of intertidal brown alga Pelvetia jastigiata in southern

California, USA. Mar. Bioi. 59: 169-179.

Hay, M.E. 1981. The functional morphology of turf-forming seaweeds: persistence in

stressful marine habitats. Ecology 62(3): 739-750.

Hecht, B. and B. Rushmore. 1973. Waddell Creek: rill: environment around .Big~.

Santa Cruz mountains, California. Environ. Studies Office, UCSC and

Semipervirens Fund, 87 pp.

Hines, A.H. 1978. Reproduction in three species of intertidal barnacles from central

California. Bioi. Bull. Mar. Bioi. Lab, Woods Hole. 154(2): 262-281.

Ingle, J.C. 1966. The movement of beach sand. Elsevier Pub!. Co., N.Y. 221 pp.

King, C.A.M. 1951. Depth disturbance of sand on sea beaches by waves. J. Sed. Petrol.

24 (3): 131-140.

Krubein, W.C. and F.J. Pettijohn. 1938. Manual of sedimentary petrography. D.

Appleton-Century Co., Inc.

Levin, S.A. 1974. Dispersion and population interactions. Amer. Nat. 108: 207-228.

Littler, M.M. 1979. Morphological form and photosynthetic performances of marine

macroalgae: tests of a functional/form hypothesis. Bot. Mar. 22: 161-165.

Littler, M. M. and D. S. Littler. 1980. The evolution of thallus form and survival strategies

in benthic marine macroalgae: Field and laboratory tests of a functional form model.

Amer. Nat. 116(1): 25-44.

Littler, M. M., D. R. Martz and D. S. Littler. 1983. Effects of recurrent sand deposition

on rocky intertidal organisms: importance of substrate heterogeneity in a fluctuating

environment. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 11: 129-139.

Markham, J. W. 1973. Observations on the ecology of l11minaria sinclaririi on three

Northern Oregon beaches. J. Phycol. 9: 336-341.

Markham J. W. and P. R. Newroth. 1972. Observations on the ecology of

Gymnogongrus linearis and related species. Inti. Seaweed Sym. 7: 127- 130.

37

Page 48: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Marks, P.L. 1974. The role of Pin Cherry (Prunus Pensylvania L.) in the maintenance of

stability in northern hardwood ecosystems. Eccol. Monogr. 44: 73-88.

Marshall, D.L. and C.D. McQuaid. 1989. The influence of respiratory responses on the

tolerance to sand inundation of the limpets PaJella grmutlaris (Prosobranchia) and

Siplwnaria capensis Q. et G (Pulmonata). J. Exp. Mar. Bioi. Ecol. 128: 191-201.

Mathieson, A.C. 1982. Field ecology of the brown alga Phaeostrophion irregulare

Setchell et Gardner. Bot Mar. 25(2): 67-85.

Meese, R.J. and P.A. Tomich. 1992. Dots on the rocks: a comparison of percent cover

estimation methods. J. Exp. Mar. Bioi. Ecol. 165(1): 59-73.

Nigg, E.W. 1988. Reproductive periodicity and its relationship to recruitment and

persistence of Endocladia muricata and Mastocarpus papillatus. Masters Thesis, San

Jose State University/ Moss Landing Marine Laboratories.

Northcraft, R.D. 1948. Marine algal colonization on the Monterey Pennisula, California.

Am. J. Bot. 35: 369-404.

Paine, R.T. and S.A. Levin. 1981. Intertidal landscapes: disturbance and the dynamics of

pattern. Ecol. Monogr. 51: 145-178.

Pickett, S.T.A. and P.S. White. 1985. The ecology .Qf natuml disturbances and l2l!!£h

dynamics. Academic Press, Inc., 472 pp.

Pineda, J. and A. Escofet. 1989. Selective effects of disturbance on populations of sea

anemones from northern Baja California, Mexico. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 55: 55-62.

Rawlence, D.J. and R.A. Taylor. 1970. The rhizoids of Polysiphonia Ianasa. Can. J. of

Bot. 48: 607-611.

Robles, C.D. 1982. Disturbance and predation in an assemblage of herbivorous diptera

and algae on rocky shores. Oecologia 54: 23-31.

Rogers, C.S. 1990. Responses of coral reefs and reef organisms to sedimentation. Mar.

Ecol. Prog. Ser. 62: 185-202.

38

Page 49: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Schwing, F.B., D.M. Husby, N. Gartield and D.E. Tracy. 1991. Mesoscale oceanic

response to wind events off central California in spring 1989: CTD Surveys and

A VHRR imagery. Cal. COFI Rep. Vol. 32.

Seapy, R. R. and M. M. Littler. 1982. Population and species diversity fluctuations in a

rocky intertidal community relative to. severe aerial exposure and sediment burial.

Mar. Bioi. 71: 87-96.

Sebens, K.P. 1980. The regulation of asexual reproduction and indeterminate body size

in the sea anemone Alztlwpleura elegantissima (Brandt). Bioi. Bull. Mar. Bioi. Lab,

Wodds Hole 158: 370-382.

Shaunghnessy, F.J. 1986. Effects of sand on the density, growth and morphology and

photosynthate of Fucus vesiculosus L. at Seabrook, New Hampshire. M.S. Thesis,

Univ. New Hampshire, 174pp.

Shepard, F.P. 1950. Beach cycles in southern California. U.S. Army Beaeh Erosion

Board, Tech. Mem. 20, 26pp.

Sousa, W. P. 1984. The role of disturbance in natural communities. Ann. Rev. Ecol.

Syst.15: 353-391.

__ 1984. Intertidal mosaics: patch size, propagule availability, and spatially variable

patterns of succession. Ecol. 65: 1918-1935.

__ 1979. Experimental investigations of disturbance and ecological succession in a

rock-y intertidal algal community. Ecol. Mono g. 49(3): 227-254.

Stephenson, T.A. and A. Stephenson. 1972. Life between the tidemarks Qll ~shores.

Freeman and Co., San Francisco, Calif.

Stewart, J. G. 1983. Fluctuations in the quantity of sediments trapped among algal thalli

on intertidal rock platforms in southern California. J. Exp. Mar. Bioi. Ecol. 73: 205-

211.

39

Page 50: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Taylor, P. R. and M. M. Littler. 1982. The roles of compensatory mortality, physical

disturbance, and substrate retention in the development and organization of a sand­

influenced, rocky-intertidal community. Ecology 63(1): 135-146.

Thistle, D. 1981. Natural physical disturbances and communities of marine soft bottom.

Mar. Ecol. Prog. Sec 6: 223-228.

Underwood, A.J. 1981. Techniques of ANOVA in experimental marine biology and

ecology. Oceanog. Mar. Bioi. Ann. Rev. 19: 513-605.

Whittaker, R.H. and S.A. Levin. 1977. The role of mosaic phenomena in natural

communities. Thea. Pop. Bioi. 12: 117-139.

Winer, B.J. 1971. Statistical !?rinciples in extJerimental design. McGraw-Hill, New York,

London.

Zar, J.H. 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall Pub!., 2nd ed., 718 pp.

Zupan, J.R. and J.A. West. 1988. Geographic variation in the life history of Mastocarpus

papilla/us (Rhodophyta). J. Phycol. 24: 223-229.

40

Page 51: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Table 1 Time table showing duration of observations and experiments.

41

Page 52: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

SEDihfENT DEPTH • D B a B

I I

R I .I ALGAUANB.fONE COVER .I I

I .jO>. BEAG! INFAUNALCORES m • a • 1-J pilot 1 I I CLEARING EXPERIMENT

-~- I .I BEACH PRORLES I I I I I

r GRAIN SIZE ANALYSES

I I B

REOPROCALTRANSPLANT

J A J 0 J A J 0 J A J 0 J A J 0 J A J 0 J A J 0

1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992

Page 53: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Table 2 Summary of sand deposition at rocky intertidal stations from Waddell

Bluffs and Scott Creek based on monthly samples for 14 months (July 1988 to August 1989). Assemblage type was named for the dominant species characterizing that station. nd=no data.

43

Page 54: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Sand measurements

Station Distance to Elevation mean sand Std. rum~. min. percent Std. ma"'c rum. months

~ IlQ. shore (m) (ml assemblaoc type n depth fcml D.!;L ...d£J2lh ...d£J2lh £Q.Y.tl D.!;L %cover %cover w/o sand

Waddell Bluffs 70.7 0.7 A. elegantissima 14 3.1 1.3 9.2 0.9 4.8 3.8 15.2 0.0 0 2 42.0 -0.2 U/va sp. 14 24.8 2.5 65.7 0.4 30.1 17.9 100.0 0.0 2 6 53.6 1.0 Ulva sp. 12 54.8 5.1 76.3 0.0 58.4 13.1 100.0 0.0 3 3 54.5 0.2 ?.pacifica 14 4.0 1.2 12.7 1.0 63.3 14.7 88.8 16.0 0 9 0.7 P. pacifica 14 2.0 0.6 6.3 0.9 53.1 8.8 100.0 5.6 0 4 55.5 1.3 Brown and Red algae 14 35.0 3.7 82.3 0.0 50.6 6.8 100.0 0.0 4 5 59.1 0.6 Brown and Red algae 14 38.3 6.2 101.5 0.0 51.8 25.9 100.0 0.0 4

Scott.<; Creek 2 nd 0.3 P. pacifica 14 2.8 1.3 10.2 0.5 23.1 12.8 47.1 7.6 0 3 nd 0.6 Ulva sp. 14 28.1 2.3 49.8 0.3 31.1 14.6 71.2 0.8 4 4 nd 0.2 A. elegantissima 14 2.0 1.0 6.8 0.7 24.2 6.5 100.0 2.8 0

Page 55: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Table 3 Single factor analysis of vmiance (ANOVA) results are shown for seasonal

sand depth versus assemblage (n=14). Student-Neuman-Keuls (SNK) test was used for pairwise multiple comparisons (Zar 1984). *p<0.05, ns=non significant (p>0.05) ..

45

Page 56: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Source

Total Assemblage Error

DEPTH VS ASSEMBLAGE

AN OVA

df

55

MS F p Comparison

561.980 10.635 0.001 mi.xed>Ulva* 3 3917.610

52 368.380 mixed>Polysiphonia* Ulva>Polysiphonia* Polysiphonia~Antlzopleura

Page 57: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Table 4 Colonization of algal removal plots in the Ulva, Polysiphonia and Red­

Brown Algal habitat. Plots were cleared February 1, 1990 and sampled periodically until April 5, April 29 and May 13, respectively. Each data point represents the mean cover (±1 SE) of 4-6 plots. Entero-diatom refers to an Enteromorphal filamentous diatom mix found in the shallow depressions of the rocky bench.

47

Page 58: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Date Febl Feb 8 Feb22 Mar9 Mar23 Apr5 Apr29 MayS I May 13 Cleared plot n (initial)

IDva sp. 4 Ulva 98 ±1.7 1.6 ±21 14 ±5.7 42 ±15.9 86 ±21.1 100- 100- 100-Polysiphonia pacifica 1.5 ±23 2.3 ±3.8 8.7 ±5.7 4.7 ±5.3 0 Entero-diatom 2.5 ±0.7 8.7 ±5.2 1.0 ±2.2 0.3 ±1.6 0 . diatoms 8.5 ±20.8 0

Polysiphonia 6 Uh•a 0.7 ±1.5 1.2 ±1.4 4.5 ±3.7 3.7 ±3.7 0.8 ±1.6 0.2 ±0.9 0.1 ±1.1 0

Polysiphonia pacifica 98 ±5.3 10.0 ±1.1 19.0 ±1.7 45 ±9.7 67 ±10.8 100- 100-

mixed alg!l~ 6 diatoms 8.0 ±4.6 7.5 ±4.3 0.8 ±1.5 0

Entero-diatom 7.0 ±4.3 0 Mastocarpus papillatus 50 ±4.2 Mastocarpusjardinii 13 ±5.3 Pelvetiafastigiata 14 ±3.6

Fucus distichus 4.5 ±10.6 Iridaea splendens 9.8 ±4.0

small red blades 5.8 ±4.6 11 ±5.3 32 ±9.7 34 ±6.6 no data 43.0 ±15.1 juv. browns 4.3 ±3.3 9.1 ±4.6 14 ±4.6 no data 14.1 ±4.3

Page 59: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Table Sa Results of reciprocal transplant experiments. Data are the mean number

(±SE) of thalli and percent cover of transplants over time for Mastocarpus and Polysiplwnia, respectively. Comparison of transplants with a cleared border and non­border are shown. In the field, transplants were marked with coded PVC to indicate patch type (Mastocarpus {M} or Polysiplwnia {P}), treatment replicate number (1-5), and treatment type (species and border). Catagories for qualitative observations of unmanipulated plants within recipient patches are as follows: no change (NC), healthy appearance(+), tissue loss(-), disintigrated (D), orange, white or bleached appearance (B), gone (G).

49

Page 60: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

~ ~Q }3Q[d~( Comrnl Qllalitativ~ r;Qntrnl lG.m~Qlant~Q s12eci~s ~ n (10 em clearing) ~into different sgecies) (into same sgecies) (unmaniEulated E:lants)

[mean± SE)

?.pacifica Ml MZ ll:ll Ml M2 ll:ll fl .E2. £>. fl .E2. £>. percent cover (SE) t=O 5 38.8 (6.2) 43.4 (9.1) 34.6 (6.3) 46.8 (9.7) 35.4 (5.7) 40.0 (10.3) 42.2 (11.6) 46.2 (9.1) 40.2 (10.0)

t=3 8 9 6 10 7 12 32 55 37 + + +

lfl t=l2 2 0 3.5 (0.7) 1.0 (1.4) 3.5 (3.5) 2.5 (3.5) 1.5 (1.2) 35.5 (4.9) 50.5 (6.4) 29.0 (1.4) NC NC NC

0 t=25 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 40.6 (11.1) 45.2 (8.1) 37.4 (9.8) NC NC

M. papilla/us fl .E2. £>. fl .E2. £>. Ml MZ ll:ll Ml MZ ll:ll number of thalli (SE) t=O 5 17.8 (7.8) 17.0 (5.5) 19.6 (5.4) 14.2 (2.9) 16.6 (6.2) 17.2 (5.8) 16.6 (5.5) 14.8 (4.5) 13.8 (3.9)

t=3 9 12 0 11 20 14 15 20 18 + + + t=12 2 14.5 (9.2) 16.0 (5.7) 11.5 (16.3) 13.5 (3.5) 14.5 (6.4) 11.0 (4.2) 17.5 (3.5) 18.0 (2.8) 15.5 (0.7) .+,- .+,B,+ t=25 5 17.0 (4.6) 16.0 (4.6) 15.2 (8.7) 14.2 (2.9) 13.4 (3.6) 14.0 (4.5) 0 0 0 G G G

Page 61: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Table Sb Results of reciprocal transplant experiments. Data are mean sand depth over

time in recipient patches (n=lO). Measurements were made at 3, 12, and 25 weeks.

51

Page 62: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

duration of

sampling date sand burial average depth in centimeters (+1SE)

n Ml M2. Ml fl 1:2. N

June 14, 1991 3 weeks 10 38.5 (5.09) 23.6 (4.92) 26.9 (5.77) 6.6 (0.49) 6.7 (1.09) 6.1 (0.24)

lJl August 12, 1991 3 months 10 64.6 (10.46) 54.6 (2.18) 62.6 (8.31) 6.6 (0.23) 7.3 (0.74) 6.5 (0.89), t-.J November 6, 1991 6 months 10 0.65 (0.55) 1.6 (1.58) 0 3.8 (0.16) 5.0 (1.84) 3.2 (0.27)

Page 63: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Table 6a Single factor analysis of variance CANOVA) results are shown for transplant

experiment recipient site (n=6) versus treatmentborder (n=3). AN OVA results demonstrating significance were analyzed with Student-Neuman-Keuls (SNK) test for multiple comparisons (Zar !984). *p<O.OS, ns=non significant (p>0.05).

53

Page 64: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

TRANSPLANTEXPER~NTS

SITE VS BORDER ANOVA

Source df MS F p

Sit~ (MJ-M2-M3l cleared 2 33.500 1.779 ns different 2 56.368 2.034 ns control (same) 2 16.037 0.44 OS

Sit~ a:J-E2-E1l cleared 2 0.007 0.283 OS

different 2 0.007 0.38 ns control (same) 2 0.016 0.391 OS

54

Page 65: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Table 6b Repeated measures ANOVAs {model Ill} were used on pooled data to

detect differences in transplant border effect over time. AN OVA results demonstrating significance were analyzed with Student-Neuman-Keuls (SNK) test for multiple comparisons (Zar 1984). *p<0.05, **p<O.Ol, ns=non significant (p>0.05).

55

Page 66: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

TIME VS BORDER REPEATED MEASURES ANOV A

Source df MS F p Comparison

E.Kti H-Q IQ !-3 mQnlb~l Fronds (time) 35 0.279 0.53 ns Ho: J.l1=J.l2 reject; different<control Border 2 6.281 17.334 • Ho: J.l1=113 accept; different=clearcd Residual 70 0.362 Ho: 112=113 reject; control>cleared

113 =J.l1 ;t).l2

EXU {t-Q tQ t-3monthsl Cover (time) 35 95.12 0.291 ** Ho: J.l1=J,l2 reject; different<<control Border 2 8005.07 74.649 * Ho: J.l1=113 reject; different>clearcd Residual 70 107.24 Ho: J.l2=113 reject; control>>eleared

(EXP. 2) {t-Q to 1-2 monUJll Cover (time) 53 114.20 0.522 ** Ho: J.l1=J.l2 reject; different<<control Border 2 4831.23 36.72 * Ho: J.l1=113 reject; differcnt>clearcd Residual 106 131.57 Ho: J.l2=113 reject; control>>eleared

113 "111 "112

56

Page 67: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Table 7 Relative abundance (per m2) of benthic invertebmtes living in rocl.:y

intertidal habitats with and without seasonal sand cover. Quadmts (0.10m2) were sampled at random locations along 50m horizontal tmnsects at 3 elevations mnging from -0.1 to 2.5m. Areas were san1pled in summer and winter of 1990. Numbers indicate mean and ±1 standard deviation (n=60). *Balanus glandula are recorded as percent cover and are not included in the category All Species.

57

Page 68: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

l1l 00

Waddell Bluffs

Rocky benches Y.ith no sand burial

All elevations

Rocky benches with sand burial

11.88 2.28 1.72 0.0 (5.20) (138) (1.20)

Summer

1.32 0.68 22.12 0.40 26.12 5.05 (1.00) (0.80) (932) (0.68) (9.60) (7.90)

All elevations nd nd nd nd nd nd 2.80 nd nd

Scott Creek

Rod.')' benches with no sand burial

All elevations

Rock-y benches with sand burial

All elevations

21.76 132 2.80 1.60 1.28 6.68 (732) (0.40) (1.20) (0.68) (1.08) (0.28)

nd nd nd nd nd nd

(2.00)

8.68 0.52 27.04 5.58 (4.12) (6.68) (10.80) (7.16)

2.53 nd nd (2.12)

16,60 132 1.00 (0.68) (0.12) (0.12)

0 0 0

Winter

o.o 0.80 0.52 38.52 032 24.12 {0.68) (0.12) (332) (0.12) (2.12)

7.39 (13.77)

0 0 0 11.60 0 (1.72)

16.91 1.45 (1.24) (·UO)

19.08 1.88 2.52 1.60 132 1.08 532 0.52 19.72 4.16 (1.56) (1.20) (0.20) (0.28} (0.40) (1.08) (0.52) (0.80) (3.72) (6.20)

0 0 0 0 0 0 6.00 0 (1.48)

27.96 0.75 (0.88) (2.11)

Page 69: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Table 8 Seasonal differences in invertebrate density were analyzed with two-tailed

independent t-tests between selected seasons, habitats and sites (n=60). *p<0.05, **p<O.Ol, ns=non significant (p>0.05). Summer/sand comparisons were not made due to limited data

59

Page 70: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

INVERTEBRATE DENSITillS

Comparison t p

Waddell Bluffs

sand vs non-sand winter 16.83 **

winter vs summer non-sand 2.73 *

Scott Creek sand vs non-sand

winter 0.71 ns winter vs summer

non-sand 5.42 *

60

Page 71: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Table 9 Grain size analysis of sediment from algal habitats and Waddell Creek

beach. Values indicate percentages from total size distribution or sorting value. Balded values indicate dominant gmin sizes. Sediment class size divisions are: coarse gmin= 2.0-1.0 mm, medium gmin= 0.354-0.177 mm, fine gmin= 0.125-0.088 mm, and silt= <0.088 mm. N=3. Silty sediment was <1 o/o for both seasons at all areas.

61

Page 72: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Summer 1221 Winter 1222 (sieve diameter in mm) (sieve diameter in mm)

¢ 1.0 0.354 0.250 0.177 0.125 1.0 0.354 0.250 0.177 0.125 0.088

Polysiplzonia pacifica 0.07 0.02 0.781 0.17 <I 0.01 0.71 0.2 0.04 An tho pleura elegantissima 0.03 0.91 0.02 0.02 <I 0.04 0.70 0.06 0.16 <I

0\ Plzyl/ospadix sp. 0.05 0.72 0.18 <I <I 0.51 0.27 0.2 0.'01 t.J

Ulva sp. 0.04 0.47 0.31 0.08 0.05 0.06 0.54 0.09 0.25 0.04

Waddell beach 0.08 0.79 0.03 0.01 0.12 0.68 0.09 0.06 <I Waddell seasonal beach <I 0.66 0.26 0.03 0.03 0.09 0.73 0.08 0.08 <I

Page 73: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Figure 1 Map of pcm1ancnt sampling stations at Waddell Bluffs and Scott Creek in

central California. Numbers indicate station reference markers on rod.)' shale bench outlines.

63

Page 74: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

l ~

~ : 0 0

64

Page 75: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Figure 2 Winter (top) and summer (bottom) cover of beach sand over the rocky shale

benches under Waddell Bluffs. Arrow indicates natural boulder reference mark. Distance between the 2 boulders in the forefront is 36 meters.

65

Page 76: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

66

Page 77: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Figure 3 Field design for the reciprocal tmnsplant experiment Factors include sand

depth (low, high), and border effect (none, 10 em). Three treatment levels (reciprocal transplant, reciprocal tmnsplant with a 10 em clearing, and a control tmnslocation) were used to test the response of transplanted algae to different sand habitats (n=5). Qualitative "natural" controls of unmanipulated plants within each recipient patch were also examined (not shown). Recipient patches (n=6) in high and low sand habitats dominated by Mastocarpus papillalils and Polysiplwnia pacifica, respectively, were chosen mndomly. Percent cover and number of thalli were measured over a 6 month interval for P. pacifica and M. papilla/us, respectively.

67

Page 78: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

DIAGRAM OF RECIPROCAL TRANSPL4.NT EXPERIMENT

Recipient Patches

00 80

M3

Polysiphonia patch

Mastocarpus patch

~ ~--E--1-- translocation control

n-5 in each recipient patcH

~ Mastocarpus papilla/us

~ Mastocarpus papilla/us ~ with !Ocm border

Polysiphonia pacifica

Polysiphonia pacifica with 10 em border

low sand habitat= Po/ysiphonia

high sand habitat= A1astocarpus

Page 79: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Figure 4 Seasonal change in sand depth in rocky intertidal habitats at Waddell Bluffs

and Scott Creek sites. Data were collected monthly for 14 months from May 1988 through August 1989. Each point represents the mean (±1 standard error) of measurements from random locations (n=lO).

69

Page 80: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

120 U/va sp. habitat

120 Red and Brown Algal habitat

--o- Waddeii-Sta. - o<~-- Waddcli-Sb, 4

_ -co _ Waddeii-Sta. 6 --o--- Waddeii-Sta. 5

100 -- Scott-Sta, 3 100

E' 80 E' 80 ~ .s .s _c

_c I o_ o_ 60 I ru 60 u ru u

u u 2 c ~ nl c I w nl 40 w 40 \ I 0 I I 1 I \

20 20 \ / •

/ .S~i.

0 0 J A s 0 N D F M A M J J A J A s 0 N D J F M A M J J A

1988 1989 1988 1989 ...-J 0

Po/ysiphonia pacifica habitat 20 Anthopleura elegantissima habitat

20

----o-- Waddeii-Sta. 3 -o-- Waddeii-Sta. 1

- i;>· - Waddeii-Sta, 9 ---- Scott-Sta. 4

_.._ Scott-Sta. 2 15 15

E E .s .s _c _c o_ o_

10 ru 10 ru u '0 u '0 c c nl nl w w

5 5

JASONDJFMAM J A 1988 1989 1988 1989

Page 81: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Figure 5 Tree diagram resulting from average linkage clustering using Ward

Minimum Variance Method on percent cover data. Euclidean distance was used to measure similarity, demonstrated by clustering of independent stations (and replicates) into 4 distinct groupings characterized by taxonomic relationship. Labels indicate site (Waddell Bluffs, w, and Scott Creek, s), station number, and replicate number (1-5).

71

Page 82: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

r ~ ~

1-1-1-. r

y lr ~

1 1-1-1-1-

L.

~ r

II-1'-lr-II-

' L. t.c r

'--~ ~ 1'-'--~

~ l[

L.

3:JNV .LS 10 NV30 11;)03 0

72

Page 83: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Figure 6 Percent cover of Ulva spp. and sand depth for intertidal sites dominated by

Ulva spp. Data were collected monthly from July 1988 through August 1989. Sand depths and percent algal cover are the mean (±1 standard deviation) of 10 and 5 measurements from random locations, respectively. nd=no data for percentage algal cover. Note scale change from a, c to b. Areas indicating an unknown percent cover due to sand are designated with [?] followed by a dashed line.

73

Page 84: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Waddell Bluffs-st. 2 Waddell Bluffs-st. 6 Scott Creek-st. 3 80 100 100 100 80 100

1'1 sand---

~ U/va-80 80

/I

80 80 60 60

~ ~ I . "' I I > E" I II

~ 0

60 I I I l 0

I I . 60 u ~ I 60

" .c I I I I l "' a. 40 I I I 40 I I I l " .._J <U I I I \ I I l c "0 iH .p.

"0 I 40 40

\~ ~ j \ 40 I 40 <U c:

' ? p I I I [!

"' I j \ <U "' I I I 1 0. 20 I

I 20 } I 20 20 \ 1 l I 0

d I 20 .l I I ? r ~..,\; ,Jl..} • 1-o "'0 "'0 ~· ' '"" f"'O'C-.::J "O"':::!'C"O "'"""""" ' ' ~"8 c c c 1::: ~ = 0 = 1::: = = 1::: = ......... c c c ' 0 0 0 0 0 J A 8 0 N D J M J J A J A 8 0 N D J F M A M J J A J A S D J F M A M J J A

1988 1989 1988 1989 1988 1989

Page 85: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Figure 7 Percent cover (n=5) of brown and red macroalgae and sand depth (n=lO)

for intertidal sites dominated by this mixed assemblage. Only species which held an average of>5% cover at some sampling date are included. nd=no data for percentage algal cover.

75

Page 86: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Waddell Blufls-sl. 4 Waddell Bluffs-sf. 5 120 100 120 100

sand ---

ri~ 100 algae-- 100 80 80

I I ft )l I I

80 "- 80 I I I ~

E I '£' I I If m

I > ~ I I 60 I I 60 0

I I "

.r:: I I I I ro -.J 0. 60 I I 60 I I I 0>

0\ m d I ro "0 I p I "0 I

I q ~ 40 I I <: c: I I

T 40 m

"' II I 9 fe "' 40 ~ I I I I 40 I m

J I I a.

\h I \

I I I I \ I I

20 fl I b' 20

? ~ I 20 I 20

I I I I ., I

I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.. ~ ~ ~ 1l 1l 1l ~ ~ ~ ~ 1l ~

" • • . • " " . . • 0 0 0 • 0 J A s 0 N D J F M A M J J A J A s 0 N D J F M A M J J A

1988 1989 1988 1989

Page 87: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Figure 8 Percent cover (n=S) of Polysiplwnia pacifica and sand depth (n=lO) for

intertidal sites dominated by Polysiphonia.

77

Page 88: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Waddell Bluffs-st. 3 Waddell Bluffs-st. 9 Scott Creek-st. 2 60 100 60 100 60 100

50 50 50 80 80 80

E' 40 "' •10 :;; > -2- 6D 0

" _c m li 30 30 30 0> "' m "' --l

"' 40 40 40 c 00 c: 20 "' Ill 20 20 sand ~ "' Polysiphonfa "' 20 CL

20 1 20 10 "\

10 10

'~~...-a" .f A. I I \ )'-.~.._ o-o-a"' \ -- .. I .._t'l""'.a-11--.n....

0 0 0 0 ~-~ • 0 0 J A A S ON D J F M AM J J A J A S ON D J F M A M J J A

1988 1989 1988 1989 1988 1989

Page 89: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Figure 9 Percent cover (n=S) of Allllwpleura elegantissima and sand depth (n=lO)

for intertidal sites dominated by the sea anemone.

79

Page 90: Effects of sand burial and movement on rocky intertidal bench

Waddell Bluffs-st. 1 Scotts Creek-st. 4

10 100 10 100

sand ---Anthop/eura --

8 80 8 ;:; 80 I

I I I ~

ID

I I I >

E" 0

I I 6

I u

-'!. 6 I I 60 I 60 ID

.c I I I c: 0

00 0. I I E 0 "' I I "' "0

f~\ I ·~ "0 4 I I 40 4 I 40

c:

f\ kt 1~\ I~ I ;:

::l I I ID

I J "' I

\ IL2 "' t 'tl 1~1 I I

o_

2 I I 20 2 20

II r \ .h- I f !'--£'

I I /

'd I 0 0 0 0

J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A J A s 0 N D J F M A M J J A 1988 1989 1988 1989


Top Related