Download - Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell response to nano-structured oxidized and turned titanium surfaces
Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cellresponse to nano-structured oxidized andturned titanium surfaces
Marco AnnunziataAdriana OlivaAntonietta BuoscioloMichele GiordanoAgostino GuidaLuigi Guida
Authors’ affiliations:Marco Annunziata, Agostino Guida, Luigi Guida,Department of Odontostomatological, Orthodontic andSurgical Disciplines, Second University of Naples,Naples, ItalyAdriana Oliva, Department of Biochemistry andBiophysics ‘‘F. Cedrangolo’’, Second University ofNaples, Naples, ItalyAntonietta Buosciolo, Michele Giordano, Institute forComposite and Biomedical Materials, NationalResearch Council (IMCB-CNR), Portici, Italy.
Corresponding author:Prof. Luigi GuidaDepartment of OdontostomatologicalOrthodontic and Surgical DisciplinesSecond University of NaplesVia L. De Crecchio6 – 80138 – NaplesItalyTel/fax: þ 39 081 566 5524e-mail: [email protected]
Key words: dental implant, fractal analysis, mesenchymal stem cells, oxidized titanium surface,
surface topography
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyse the topographic features of a novel nano-structured
oxidized titanium implant surface and to evaluate its effect on the response of human bone marrow
mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSC) compared with a traditional turned surface.
Methods: The 10 � 10 � 1 mm turned (control) and oxidized (test) titanium samples (P.H.I. s.r.l.) were
examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) and
characterized by height, spatial and hybrid roughness parameters at different dimensional ranges of
analysis. Primary cultures of BM-MSC were seeded on titanium samples and cell morphology, adhesion,
proliferation and osteogenic differentiation, in terms of alkaline phosphatase activity, osteocalcin
synthesis and extracellular matrix mineralization, were evaluated.
Results: At SEM and AFM analyses turned samples were grooved, whereas oxidized surfaces showed a
more complex micro- and nano-scaled texture, with higher values of roughness parameters. Cell
adhesion and osteogenic parameters were greater on oxidized (Po0.05 at least) vs. turned surfaces,
whereas the cell proliferation rate was similar on both samples.
Conclusions: Although both control and test samples were in the range of average roughness proper
of smooth surfaces, they exhibited significantly different topographic properties in terms of height,
spatial and, mostly, of hybrid parameters. This different micro- and nano-structure resulted in an
enhanced adhesion and differentiation of cells plated onto the oxidized surfaces.
The principle of promoting osseointegration by
modification of implant surface features still
represents one of the most prolific and active
fields of dental implant research. Modern micro-
rough titanium surfaces has been widely im-
proved to promote implant osseointegration,
with respect to traditional smooth turned sur-
faces, both in terms of bone-to-implant contact
rate and retention into the bone (Buser et al.
1991; Ericsson et al. 1994; Gotfredsen et al.
2000; Cho & Park 2003; Shalabi et al. 2006).
The advantages of rough surfaces have been
confirmed also in the clinical field by long-term
data, particularly in the case of compromised
bone sites rather than in ordinary cases (Lambert
et al. 2009; Balshe et al. 2009).
Nevertheless, the research continues world-
wide with the aim to further improve the perfor-
mance of dental implants, accelerating and
maintaining their integration into hard and soft
tissues and/or extending their indications. One
of the most recent frontier in dental implant
research includes the modification of the surface
topography at a nano-scale level (for review
see Mendonca et al. 2008). Surface nano-
textures, providing an increased surface area
and finer surface roughness, may yield better
tissue-titanium mechanical interlocking (Meir-
elles et al. 2008). Furthermore, such nano-scaled
features have been speculated to directly affect
bone cell behaviour different from conventional
sized surfaces (Kubo et al. 2009; Guida et al.
2010), creating a biomimetic relationship be-
tween alloplastic surfaces and host tissues
through the recapitulation of natural cellular
environments at the nano-scale level (Mendonca
et al. 2008).
So far, only few studies have investigated the
importance of nano-scaled structures on implant
osseointegration but they mainly agree that such
structures have an impact on the early bone
healing, although their optimal size and distribu-
tion upon the implant surfaces is still far to be
defined (Wennerberg & Albrektsson 2009).
Date:Accepted 1 March 2011
To cite this article:Annunziata M, Oliva A, Buosciolo A, Giordano M, GuidaA, Guida L. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell responseto nano-structured oxidized and turned titanium surfaces.Clin. Oral Impl. Res. xx, 2011; 000–000.doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02194.x
c� 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S 1
Despite the extensive clinical use of roughed
implants, indeed, the identity of the fundamental
parameters of implant surface topography that are
responsible for improving the rate and extent of
new bone formation remains largely unknown.
This is also due to the lack of standardized methods
and parameters inside the existing literature that
does not allow an easy comparison of the obtained
results. In 2000, Wennerberg and Albrektsson,
after a 10-year study on implant surfaces, formu-
lated a set of guidelines for their topographic
analysis highlighting the importance of reporting
multiple parameters and multi-scale measure-
ments for a proper surface characterization.
An ideal tool to investigate the interaction
between the bone cells and the implant surface
is represented by the bone marrow mesenchymal
stem cells (BM-MSC). BM-MSC are multipotent
cells which are able to self-renew and to differ-
entiate into precursors of several tissues, includ-
ing osteoprogenitor cells (Krebsbach et al. 1999;
Davies et al. 2002). They are involved in the
normal remodelling and reparative mechanisms
of bone, and play a central role in the osseointe-
gration process.
The aim of the present study was to character-
ize the micro- and nano-texture of a novel oxi-
dized titanium implant surface with respect to a
conventional turned one, and to evaluate the
ability of such surfaces to affect the response of
human BM-MSC in terms of adhesion, prolifera-
tion and osteogenic differentiation.
Materials and methods
Products and reagents
All cell culture biologics were purchased from
Gibco BRL (Grand Island, NY, USA), and all
chemicals were from Sigma Chemical Co. (St.
Louis, MO, USA), when not otherwise specified.
Specimen preparation
Two different titanium implant surfaces were
analysed: turned titanium surfaces (control) and
oxidized titanium surfaces (test). All specimens
were provided by a commercial firm (P.H.I. s.r.l.,
San Vittore Olona, Milano, Italy) in form of
10 � 10 � 1 mm samples of commercially pure
titanium. Test samples were produced by a pro-
cess of anodic oxidation in an aqueous solution of
1 M sulphuric acid and 0.15% hydrofluoric acid
at a cell voltage of 20 V at ambient temperature.
For cell culture assays the samples were
sterilized by autoclaving and put at the bottom
of 24-well plates.
Surface topography characterization
Qualitative and quantitative measurements of
titanium surfaces were made by atomic force
microscopy (AFM). In parallel, implant samples
were also imaged by scanning electron micro-
scopy (SEM) to visualize their topographic fea-
tures on a larger spatial range.
AFM technique is based on a tip of atomic
level, which is brought closer to the sample. The
interaction of the forces between the tip and the
sample are recorded by the deflection of a laser
beam reflecting on the cantilever attached to the
tip, in order to produce an accurate three-dimen-
sional map of the outer surface.
The images were obtained with an AFM-
SNOM system: the Multiview 1000 (by Nano-
nics Imaging Ltd, Jerusalem, Israel), scanning probe
microscope operating in AFM tapping mode. The
measuring range available with this system was
75mm in x, y and z direction. Super-thin probes
(cantilevered optical fibre probes, nominal spring
constant � 5 N/m, resonance frequency in the
range 50–100 kHz, by Nanonics Imaging Ltd)
with a tip radius of curvature 5 nm were used in
order to minimize convolution effects.
Images were acquired in four different dimen-
sional ranges of decreasing dimension:
50 � 50mm2 (range I), 15 � 15mm (range II),
5 � 5mm (range III) and 1.5 � 1.5mm (range
IV). For every dimensional range, seven images
were collected on different points, randomly dis-
tributed upon the surface, belonging both to the
centre, and to the edge of the samples. In this
way it was possible to obtain a multi-scale
characterization of the surface topography, from
standard length reported in literature down to the
length scale at which single cell interacts with
the surface.
A Gaussian filter was applied on large area
images (50 � 50 mm) to separate roughness from
errors of form and waviness, as recommended by
Wennerberg & Albrektsson (2000). The evalua-
tion and the images were obtained using SPIPt
(Scanning Probe Image Processor, Image Metrol-
ogy, H�rsholm, Denmark) software. The follow-
ing surface parameters were considered:
Sa (mm)¼ average roughness; average height
deviation from a mean plane within the measur-
ing area.
Sds (mm�2)¼ summit density; the number of
summits per unit area.
Sdr (%)¼developed interfacial area ratio; addi-
tional surface area contributed by the roughness
compared to a totally flat plane.
Sfd¼surface fractal dimension; the degree of
complexity of surface texture.
Preparation of human bone marrow mesenchymalstem cells (BM-MSC)
Samples of human bone marrow were harvested
from healthy donors, after informed consent was
provided, according to the Declaration of Hel-
sinki. Informed consent and research protocol
were institutionally approved. BM-MSC cultures
were initiated as described previously (Oliva et al.
2005). Briefly, heparinized bone marrow sample
was diluted 1 : 5 with complete culture medium
consisting of Opti-MEM containing 10% foetal
calf serum (FCS), 100 units/ml penicillin, 100mg/
ml streptomycin and 50 mg/ml sodium ascorbate,
and incubated at 371C in a 5% CO2 humidified
atmosphere. Although present in the bone mar-
row in a percent extremely low with respect to
the total of mononuclear cells, BM-MSC can be
easily obtained on the basis of their ability to
adhere to polystyrene plates, while the cells of
the haemopoietic lineage remain in suspension
and can be removed. After 48 h, the medium
containing all non-adherent cellular elements
was centrifuged for 10 min at 800 � g in order
to remove the haematopoietic cells, and added
again to the dish. In 3–4 days, several foci of
adherent spindle-like cells appeared and reached
the sub-confluence in 1–2 weeks. The medium
was refreshed every 3 days, each time leaving one
half of the conditioned medium. For this study,
BM-MSC obtained from two volunteers, one
woman and one man, aged 25 and 42 years,
respectively, were used. The cells harvested
from each donor were kept separately and not
pooled. Cultures between the second and fourth
passage were used in the present experiments.
Cell adhesion and proliferation
Control and test samples were put at the bottom
of 24-well plates. BM-MSC were seeded on im-
plant surfaces at a density of 15,000 cells/cm2 in
complete culture medium. Cell adhesion to im-
plant surfaces at 6 h and cell proliferation at 7 days
from plating were assessed by MTT vitality assay.
The key component of this assay is 3-(4,5-di-
methylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bro-
mide (MTT). Mitochondrial dehydrogenases of
living cells reduce the tetrazolium ring, yielding
a blue formazan product, which can be measured
spectrophotometrically. Cells were washed with
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and incubated
with 0.5 mg/ml MTT solution for 4 h at 371C.
At the end of this time, the liquid was aspirated
and the insoluble formazan produced was dis-
solved in isopropanol-HCl 0.1 M. The optical
density was measured at 570 nm, subtracting the
background absorbance determined at 690 nm.
Cell adhesion and morphology were also eval-
uated by SEM analysis. Cells were plated on
titanium surfaces as mentioned above. After 6 h
cells were rinsed three times with PBS and fixed
for 30 min with 2.5% glutaraldehyde. The fixed
cell layers were washed in PBS and dehydrated by
graded ethanol solutions (from 60 to 100%) and
critical point drying. Samples were mounted on
stubs, coated with Au/Pd alloy and examined by
Annunziata et al �BM-MSC response to oxidized and turned implant surfaces
2 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02194.x c� 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S
SEM (Philips SEM XL20, Eindhoven, the
Netherlands).
Osteogenic markers
The effects on cell differentiation were evaluated
analysing the expression of specific markers of
the osteoblastic phenotype, namely alkaline
phosphatase activity, osteocalcin production and
the mineralization of the extracellular matrix.
Alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity
The AP specific activity of BM-MSC grown on
the titanium surfaces was evaluated after 7 and
14 days of culture. Once removed the medium,
the wells were rinsed with 20 mM Tris HCl-
0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.4 (TBS) and the cells lysed
with a specific buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4,
0.5 mM NaCl, 0.25%Triton X-100, 0.5 mM
PMSF, 0.5 mM DTT). AP activity was deter-
mined by measuring the release of para-nitrophe-
nol (PNP) from disodium para-nitrophenyl
phosphate (PNPP). The reaction mixture con-
tained 10 mM PNPP, 0.5 mM MgCl2, diethano-
lamine phosphate buffer pH 10.5, and 10–30mg of
cell lysate in a final volume of 100ml. After
10 min at 371C, the reaction was stopped by
adding 100ml of 0.5 M NaOH. PNP levels were
measured spectrophotometrically at 405 nm. The
AP activity was normalized to the protein con-
tent and expressed as units/mg protein, where
1 U was defined as the amount of enzyme that
hydrolyses 1 nmol of PNPP/min under the spe-
cified conditions
Osteocalcin synthesis
To evaluate osteocalcin synthesis, confluent cul-
tures, grown on the different surfaces for 2 weeks,
were incubated in FCS-free Opti-MEM in pre-
sence of 0.1% bovine serum albumin and
100 nM 1,25-dhydroxycolecalciferol for 48 h.
The levels of polypeptide secreted in the medium
were measured by means of an ELISA kit (Bio-
source International, Camarillo, CA, USA) that
utilizes highly specific monoclonal antibodies
and a peroxidase as a conjugated enzyme. The
amount of osteocalcin was calculated in ng/ml on
the basis of the optical density assessed at 450
and normalized to protein content.
Extracellular matrix mineralization
The ability of titanium surfaces to promote the
extracellular matrix mineralization was tested by
alizarin red staining (ARS). BM-MSC confluent
cultures were incubated for 21 days with an
osteogenic medium composed of 100 nM dexa-
methasone and 10 mM b-glycerophosphate.
Briefly, cell layers were fixed in 10% formalde-
hyde for 15 min before adding 1 ml of 40 mM
ARS (pH 4.1) per well. After a 20-min incuba-
tion, the layers were lysed with 10% acetic acid.
The lysates were then centrifuged at 20,000 � g
for 15 min and the supernatants neutralized with
10% ammonium hydroxide. Finally the samples
were read at 405 nm.
Statistical analysis
All the experiments were performed in quadru-
plicate on two different cell preparations. No
intra-group difference was detected in any of the
investigated parameters. Differences between the
experimental groups were analysed by non-para-
metric statistics (Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test),
with the value of significance set at Po0.05.
Statistical analysis was performed using the
NCSS software (NCSS for Windows, Kaysville,
UT, USA).
Results
SEM images of the two different titanium sam-
ples at 1000 and 10,0000 magnifications are
shown in Fig. 1a and b, respectively. Figure 2
reports representative AFM height images of
control and test sample at different ranges. It is
clearly observable in both SEM and AFM images
that turned sample appear grooved, whereas the
oxidized one showed a more complex micro- and
nano-scaled topography. The grooves upon
turned sample exhibited a preferential direction
with their width and depth decreasing while
reducing the dimensional range: from 4.8 �0.9 mm large and 1.3 � 0.5 mm high in the range
I, to 468 � 43 nm large and 87 � 27 nm high in
the range IV. On the contrary, oxidized sample
shows a uniformly rough surface characterized
by micro-pits with a mean width value of
6.7 � 4.15mm, distributed over the whole
surface, superimposed on a previously grooved
surface.
High magnification SEM images (Fig. 1, panel
b) reveal the effective nano-structure of both
turned and oxidized surfaces. Turned surface at
nano-scale level was characterized by a uniform
granular aspect with nano-particles of mean dia-
meter of 39 � 0.9 nm. On the contrary, the
oxidized surface presents a complex structure
also at nano-scale level: it was covered by tightly
packed grain-like particles (mean diameter
89 � 16 nm) and nano-pores with an internal
mean diameter of 47 � 11 nm arranged in a
honeycomb pattern.
Topographical parameters estimated by AFM
images for such implant surfaces are reported in
Tables 1 and 2 and are discussed in detail below.
For the larger scale images (50 � 50mm) when no
filtering was applied, oxidized samples showed
significantly lower Sa values compared with
turned ones (Table 1). However, when a Gaus-
sian filter was applied, the situation reversed: Sa
was 91 nm for oxidized surface and 67 nm for
Fig. 1. Scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) images of turned and oxidized titanium surfaces at magnification x1000 (a) and
� 100000 (b).
Annunziata et al �BM-MSC response to oxidized and turned implant surfaces
c� 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S 3 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02194.x
turned one. Both Sa values belong to the nano-
scale level, but they are significantly different.
Such filter-dependence of roughness values was
not evidenced for the other parameters measured.
The developed surface area of oxidized surface is
about one order of magnitude higher than that of
turned surface. The fractal dimension (whose
theoretical value is between 2 and 3) of oxidized
surface was very high compared with turned one,
whereas no difference of Sds between the two
surfaces was verified at this length scale. Sa, Sdr
and Sfd values reflect the completely different
texture of the two surfaces as described at the
beginning of the paragraph on the basis of
the multi-scale AFM measurement reported in
Fig. 2.
Regarding the analysis performed at the other
three imaging scales, it is clearly observable from
Table 2 that while decreasing the dimensional
range, all surface parameters related to the oxi-
dized surfaces are always higher compared with
those of the turned ones, except for Sa values in
the range 15 � 15mm.
The following step in the characterization of
these surfaces has been the evaluation of the
effects of their interaction with the human BM-
MSC in terms of adhesion, proliferation and
osteogenic differentiation. The selection of these
cells is supported by their involvement into the
normal remodelling and reparative mechanisms
of bone, as well as in the osseointegration pro-
cess. BM-MSC were seeded at a density of
15,000 cells/cm2 and 6 h after plating cell adhe-
sion to implant surfaces was assessed by SEM
analysis and MTT viability test. Cells appeared
intimately spread on both turned and oxidized
surfaces: many intercellular interactions were
evident, in particular philopodia and lamellipo-
dia, with a veil-like appearance, were in close
contact with the underlying titanium surfaces,
the texture of which was clearly visible (Fig. 3,
panel a, white arrows). The intimate interaction
of cell processes with the surface texture at a
nano-scale level became evident at higher mag-
nification (Fig. 3, panel b).
When 6-h cell viability was measured, a
slightly higher number of cells (as expression of
MTT values) was evidenced on oxidized surfaces
(Po0.05) with respect to turned ones (Fig. 4). At
7 days, the MTT values became comparable
(P40.05) between test and control surfaces, in-
dicating that, after an early differential tendency
to adhere to the substrate, a comparable number
of cells attached successively on both surface
types reaching a similar proliferation rate.
Interestingly, both early and late osteogenic
markers were positively affected by test samples
compared with the control ones (Fig. 5). Alkaline
phosphatase specific activity is commonly con-
sidered an early marker of osteogenic differentia-
tion, being the AP, an enzyme implicated in the
formation of hydroxyapatite crystals during
extracellular matrix mineralization. Comparable
7-day values of AP specific activity between
cells grown onto test and control surfaces were
found, whereas, after 14 days, a significantly
(Po0.05) higher enzyme activity (about 40%)
for oxidized samples compared with turned ones
was evidenced.
This late trend for an enhanced osteogenic
differentiation of BM-MSC grown on oxidized
samples was confirmed by the expression of
Fig. 2. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images of turned and oxidized samples at different analysis ranges.
Annunziata et al �BM-MSC response to oxidized and turned implant surfaces
4 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02194.x c� 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S
greater levels (about 30%) of osteocalcin synth-
esis and a two-fold higher extracellular matrix
mineralization levels with respect to turned sur-
faces (Po0.05).
Discussion
The main finding of the present study has re-
garded the topographical modifications and the
biological performance induced by the oxidation
treatment on titanium implant surfaces. Indeed,
such treatment modified the topographical prop-
erties of titanium surfaces, at both micro- and
nano-scale level, and affected the biological re-
sponse of human BM-MSC to them compared
with control turned surfaces.
The oxidation treatment forms a thick oxide
layer on the titanium implants used as an anode
in a galvanic cell with a suitable electrolyte (Le
Guehennec et al. 2007; Wennerberg & Albrekts-
son 2009). From a micro-topographical point of
view, both oxidized and turned surfaces exhibited
Sa values o0.5mm. Following the classification
proposed by Albrektsson & Wennerberg (2004),
both of them must be considered in the same
category (i.e. smooth); however, their surface
texture appeared considerably different at either
micro or nano-scale level, as evidenced at both
microscopic (SEM) and roughness (AFM) ana-
lyses. In particular, the oxidized samples tested
in the present study were characterized by a more
complex surface texture, with micro-pits and
with nodules and pores of nano-scale dimension.
Such marked difference in terms of surface
texture between the control and test samples
was hardly detected by conventional roughness
analysis (i.e. Sa), which is solely descriptive of
height of surface irregularities, while it was
clearly evident taking into account spatial (i.e.
Sfd) and, mostly, hybrid (i.e. Sdr) roughness
parameters, which include also spatial informa-
tion. This finding highlights what was described
by Wennerberg & Albrektsson (2000) about the
obtaining of an exhaustive characterization of a
surface, that can be obtained only using multiple
roughness parameters and proper filtering proce-
dures. In this study, for instance, non-filtered Sa
values indicated the oxidized surface to be
smoother than the turned one. However, when
a proper filter was applied to exclude errors of
form and waviness, and also spatial and hybrid
parameters were considered, it was possible
to find out the significantly more complex tex-
ture of the oxidized surface and its nano-scale
roughness.
The higher percentage of additional area con-
tributed by the complex nano-roughened oxi-
dized surface could have some implications
from a biological standpoint at either tissue level,
providing larger and more intimate interlocking
between implant surface and bone, or cellular
level, as it will be discussed in succession.
In the present study, oxidized surfaces showed
to affect both cell interaction and behaviour
compared with turned samples. In particular,
BM-MSC adhesion was slightly but significantly
increased on oxidized surfaces. Both direct cell–
surface interactions and indirect protein-surface
interactions may explain this finding (Brunette
1988), which is of pivotal importance, represent-
ing the first step of every following event of the
osseointegration process at the bone–implant
interface.
Unlike cell adhesion, cell proliferation was not
conditioned by oxidized surfaces at 7 days of
culture. This finding indicates that, in an initial
phase after plating, cells adhere faster on the
oxidized rather than on the turned surfaces,
however, subsequently, a comparable number of
cells completes the adhesion process also on the
control sample and cells proliferate at a similar
rate on both surface types.
Furthermore, oxidized surfaces elicited the os-
teogenic potentiality of BM-MSC and induced
them to express at a higher level the parameters
typical of the osteoblastic phenotype. Indeed,
BM-MSC grown on test samples showed an
increase of alkaline phosphatase activity and
osteocalcin levels as well as of the mineralization
of the extracellular matrix, from 7 to 21 days
after plating.
Similar findings in terms of stimulation of cell
biological functions by nano-structured titanium
surfaces were reported also by other studies. Das
et al. (2009) showed enhanced adhesion, prolif-
Table 1. Surface parameters of turned and oxidized titanium surfaces (50 � 50 lm analysis range), with and without Gaussian filtering
Parameter Sa (mm) Sds (mm� 2) Sdr (%) Sfd
Filter size None 49 � 49 mm None 49 � 49mm None 49 � 49mm None 49 � 49mm
Oxidized 0.208 0.091 1.070 1.120 10.60 10.50 2.588 2.295(0.127–0.276) (0.075–0.113) (0.651–1.600) (0.692–1.260) (4.65–24.80) (4.48–24.70) (2.578–2.603) (2.260–2.361)
Turned 0.304 0.067 0.590 0.882 1.18 1.12 2.179 2.081(0.193–0.343) (0.046–0.093) (0.405–1.700) (0.634–1.810) (0.552–4.610) (0.287–4.010) (2.097–2.238) (2.013–2.109)
Signif. n n nn nn nn nn
N¼7/group.nPo0.05 andnnPo0.01 between oxidized and turned.
Data are expressed as medians with minimum and maximum values reported in parentheses.
Table 2. Surface parameters of turned and oxidized titanium surfaces at different analysis ranges
Parameter Range Sa (nm) Sds (mm� 2) Sdr (%) Sfd
Oxidized 15 � 15 mm 129.7 5.18 11.5 2.18(79.7–152.6) (4.31–5.95) (9.6–17.8) (2.16–2.23)
Turned 156 2.91 1.5 2.012(50.6–301.4) (2.58–2.99) (0.7–1.8) (2.007–2.023)
Significance nn nn n
Oxidized 5 � 5 mm 78.11 29.56 28.92 2.188(50.69–113.41) (28.23–33.41) (28.1–33.15) (2.115–2.269)
Turned 46.12 18.88 3.813 1.974(38.55–67.23) (14.29–19.97) (2.917–4.756) (1.910–2.007)
Significance nn nn nn n
Oxidized 1.5 � 1.5 mm 41.41 476 49 2.174(30.76–85.12) (378–567) (38–65) (2.091–2.263)
Turned 13.2 231 3.2 1.987(8.3–25.7) (168–261) (1.3–3.5) (1.929–2.076)
Significance nn nn nn n
N¼7/group.nPo0.05 andnnPo0.01 between oxidized and turned.
Data are expressed as medians with minimum and maximum values reported in parentheses.
Annunziata et al �BM-MSC response to oxidized and turned implant surfaces
c� 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S 5 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02194.x
eration, AP activity and mineralization by hu-
man osteoblasts cultured on oxidized implant
surfaces with nano-pores of 50–100 nm diameter.
Kubo et al. (2009) investigated implant surfaces
with a micropit-and-nano-nodule hybrid topogra-
phy reporting that the addition of nano-structures
to a micro-roughened implant surface was able to
stimulate the proliferation and the differentiation
of osteoblast cells.
In order to correctly interpret these findings,
different factors must be taken into account,
including the chemistry and the structural proper-
ties of the implant surfaces. Although both test
and control samples used in the present study
originated from the same type of commercially
pure titanium, it is noteworthy that every surface
treatment, such as anodization, affects both topo-
graphical and chemical properties of such materi-
als. In the opinion of the authors, the different
cellular response found between the two surfaces
may be mostly attributed to the complex surface
texture of the oxidized samples, with both a
micro- and a nano-scale feature, even if some
influence due to chemical surface alterations
cannot be excluded. Various reports support the
concept that nano- and micro-topography act
synergistically to promote implant osseointegra-
tion. In particular, it has been speculated that
nano-topography could play a role at cellular level
enhancing osteoblastic differentiation, without
directly affecting implant stability, which is pri-
marily conditioned by micro-scale topography
and implant macro-design (Mendonca et al.
2008). With respect to the old smooth surfaces,
the novel moderately rough implants are asso-
ciated with improved in vivo performances; many
of them show nano-scaled surface features (Meir-
elles et al. 2008; Guida et al. 2010), but whether
the nano-topography could have a role in such
improvement remains a matter of debate (Shalabi
et al. 2006; Wennerberg & Albrektsson 2009).
In conclusion, both oxidized and turned sur-
faces must be included in the ‘‘smooth’’ category
basing on their Sa value at a wide (50 � 50mm)
range, however their surface texture at micro and
nano-scale level was considerably different, and
could be properly characterized only using a
multi-range/multi-parameter approach and
proper filtering procedures. Oxidized surfaces
enhanced the adhesion of BM-MSC, as well as
their differentiation toward the osteoblastic phe-
notype, compared with the turned ones. Whether
these findings could be related to the topographi-
cal or to the physico-chemical changes induced
by the applied roughening technologies needs
supplementary analyses. Anyway, the possibility
to affect cell behaviour and, in turn, bone–im-
plant interaction and implant osseointegration,
acting on surface modifications, is particularly
fascinating.
Fig. 4. 6 hour-adhesion (a) and 7 day-proliferation (b) of BM-MSC cultured on turned and oxidized surfaces, as assessed by
MTT test. Data are expressed by box-plots indicating medians with lower/upper quartiles, and minimum/maximum values.
N=8/group; nnP o 0.01.
Fig. 3. SEM images of BM-MSC grown for 6 h on turned and oxidized samples at magnification x2,500 (a) and x100,000 (b).
Annunziata et al �BM-MSC response to oxidized and turned implant surfaces
6 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02194.x c� 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S
References
Albrektsson, T. & Wennerberg, A. (2004) Oral implant
surfaces: part 1 – review focusing on topographic and
chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo
responses to them. International Journal of Prostho-
dontics 17: 536–543.
Balshe, A.A., Assad, D.A., Eckert, S.E., Koka, S. &
Weaver, A.L. (2009) A retrospective study of the
survival of smooth- and rough-surface dental im-
plants. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofa-
cial Implants 24: 1113–1118.
Brunette, D.M. (1988) The effects of implant surface
topography on the behavior of cells. International
Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 3:
231–334.
Buser, D., Schenk, R.K., Steinmenn, S., Fiorellini, J.P.,
Fox, C.H. & Stich, H. (1991) Influence of surface
characteristics on bone integration of titanium
implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature
pigs. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 25:
889–902.
Cho, S.A. & Park, K.T. (2003) The removal torque of
titanium screw inserted in rabbit tibia treated by dual
acid etching. Biomaterials 24: 3611–3617.
Das, K., Bose, S. & Bandyopadhyay, A. (2009)
TiO2 nanotubes on Ti: influence of nanoscale
morphology on bone cell-materials interaction.
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A 90:
225–237.
Davies, J.E., Karp, J.M. & Baksh, D. (2002) Mesench-
ymal cell culture: bone. In: Atala, A. & Lanza, R.,
Fig. 5. Osteogenic markers expressed by BM-MSC grown on turned and oxidized surfaces. Alkaline phosphatase (AP) activity at 7 and 14 days (a), osteocalcin synthesis at 14 days (b) and
Alizarin Red Staining of mineralized extracellular matrix at 21 days (c) were assessed. Data are expressed by box-plots indicating medians with lower/upper quartiles, and minimum/
maximum values. N=8/group; nPo 0.05, nnPo 0.01.
Annunziata et al �BM-MSC response to oxidized and turned implant surfaces
c� 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S 7 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02194.x
eds. Methods of Tissue Engineering, 333–334. San
Diego: Academic Press.
Ericsson, I., Johansson, C.B., Bystedt, H. & Norton,
M.R. (1994) A histomorphometric evaluation of
bone-to-implant contact on machine-prepared and
roughened titanium dental implants. Clinical Oral
Implants Research 5: 202–206.
Gotfredsen, K., Berglundh, T. & Lindhe, J. (2000)
Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface
characteristics: an experimental study in rabbits.
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2:
120–128.
Guida, L., Annunziata, M., Rocci, A., Contaldo, M.,
Rullo, R. & Oliva, A. (2010) Biological response of
human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to
fluoride-modified titanium surfaces. Clinical Oral
Implants Research 21: 1234–1241.
Krebsbach, P.H., Kuznetsov, S.A., Bianco, P. & Robey,
P.G. (1999) Bone marrow stromal cells: characteriza-
tion and clinical application. Critical Reviews in Oral
Biology and Medicine 102: 165–181.
Kubo, K., Tsukimura, N., Iwasa, F., Ueno, T.,
Saruwatari, L., Aita, H., Chiou, W.A. & Ogawa, T.
(2009) Cellular behavior on TiO2 nanonodular
structures in a micro-to-nanoscale hierarchy
model. Biomaterials 30: 5319–5329. Epub July 9,
2009.
Lambert, F.E., Weber, H.P., Susarla, S.M., Belser, U.C. &
Gallucci, G.O. (2009) Descriptive analysis of implant
and prosthodontic survival rates with fixed implant-
supported rehabilitations in the edentulous maxilla.
Journal of Periodontology 80: 1220–1230.
Le Guehennec, L., Soueidan, A., Layrolle, P. & Amouriq,
Y. (2007) Surface treatments of titanium dental implants
for rapid osseointegration. Dental Materials 23: 844–854.
Meirelles, L., Currie, F., Jacobsson, M., Albrektsson, T.
& Wennerberg, A. (2008) The effect of chemical and
nanotopographical modifications on the early stages
of osseointegration. International Journal of Oral and
Maxillofacial Implants 23: 641–647.
Mendonca, G., Mendonca, D.B.S., Aragao, F.J.L. &
Cooper, L.F. (2008) Advancing dental implant surface
technology – from micron to nanotopography. Bio-
materials 29: 3822–3835.
Oliva, A., Passaro, I., Di Pasquale, R., Di Feo, A.,
Criscuolo, M., Zappia, V., Della Ragione, F.,
D’amato, S., Annunziata, M. & Guida, L. (2005)
Ex vivo expansion of bone marrow stromal cells by
platelet-rich plasma: a promising strategy in maxillo-
facial surgery. International Journal of Immuno-
pathology and Pharmacology 18: 47–53.
Shalabi, M.M., Gortemaker, A., Van’t Hof, M.A.,
Jansen, J.A. & Creugers, N.H. (2006) Implant surface
roughness and bone healing: a systematic review.
Journal of Dental Research 85: 496–500.
Wennerberg, A. & Albrektsson, T. (2000) Suggested
guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant
surfaces. International Journal of Oral and Maxillo-
facial Implants 15: 331–344.
Wennerberg, A. & Albrektsson, T. (2009) Effects of
titanium surface topography on bone integration: a
systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research
20: 172–184.
Annunziata et al �BM-MSC response to oxidized and turned implant surfaces
8 | Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02194.x c� 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S