Transcript
Page 1: Architectural Portfolio

Architectural Portfolio 2009-14

Page 2: Architectural Portfolio
Page 3: Architectural Portfolio

Contents

Part i

Academic Work:

Puget Point / Studio 6

Otis College of Art & Design

March - May 2013

Part ii

Collaborative Work:

re.LAX / Shashi Caan-Master Class

Otis College of Art & Design

March 2013

A+C Design School / Studio 5

Otis College of Art & Design

August - December 2012

TAUT / Design Collaboration - GILLIS

A+D Museum Los Angeles, CA

April - June 2012

Part iii

Professional Work:

Barker Block Lofts / Nakada+Associates

Los Angeles, CA

Completed 2014

100 LBB, Edison / Nakada+Associates

Long Beach, CA

June 2012 - Present

Part iv

Personal Work:

Figure Studies

Page 4: Architectural Portfolio

“Climate change does not respect border; it does not respect who you are -

rich and poor, small and big. Therefore, this is what we call 'global

challenges', which require global solidarity.”

- Ban Ki-Moon

Page 5: Architectural Portfolio

Puget Point

Global Warming and climate

change have been a pressing

issue for many, and e8ects

all. It has been identi;ed

as a problem that will take

a substantial amount of time

to recover from and has a

direct correlation with the

amount of participants.

In the immediate future, the

necessity for the education

of youth and the general

public will become more

vital. Empowered by

knowledge gained, more

people will begin to

comprehend the daunting task

at hand. This will cause the

number of participants to

rise and will expedite the

process of positive change.

Seattle, Washington

Puget Point is an immediate

response to the process of

educating the public. It is

a Research Facility with the

main goal of enriching the

lives of the general public

through R&D. It serves other

functions as well; creating

habitats for the dwindling

salmon population of Puget

Sound, initializing swell

breaks, and altering its

original function to become

a safe haven in times of

crisis.

Page 6: Architectural Portfolio

The current sea +oor at Puget Sound is primarily

man-made, much like the arti9cial island Olympia

permanentely docked at the mouth of Puget Sound. Once

a thriving salmon zone, the sea creatures were slowly

pushed out due to increased boat traAic and the major

terra-forming that took place at the sea bed which

+attened out the sea +oor; thus, destroying the

natural habitat that once protected salmon from

predators.

At the head of the Duwamish Waterway (located East of

the primary site). There is high potential for swells

and surges if the water level were to rise signifcant-

ly, leading to the loss of primarily residential land.

The proposal is for extended terra-formation that

would provide an extension of the beach out into the

waters. The new land formation would be supported by a

series of “stilts” that would recreate a habitable

zone for local sea creatures.

terra-formed beach extenstion

project building site

points of interest / ferry locations

main roadways

ferry-ways

Page 7: Architectural Portfolio

1. The &oor-plate of the ocean

above the Duwamish Waterway is

man-made and therefore &at.

This causes fast underwater

currents and a lack of habit-

able places for local wildlife

to breed and rest.

3. The newly developed beach

acts as a bu>er for the shore-

line in times of storm surges.

This allows rushing sea water

to gradually make its way up a

controlled slope.

5. The strips are then

stretched and compressed hori-

zontally to maximize land to

water ratio, maximizing bu>er-

ing ability.

2. Pillars are raised to dis-

rupt disturbing under-currents

which aids in repolulation of

local wildlife through creation

of habitable areas. It also

begins to frame the structure

of the beach extension.

4. To increase the e>ective-

ness of the beach, the land is

parcelled into strips that

would undulate vertically and

control the direction of the

rising sea water.

6. Puget Point acts as an

extension of the beach bu>er,

acting as research center,

storm surge bu>er, as well as a

habitable environment for wild-

life.

1 2

5 6

3 4

Page 8: Architectural Portfolio

WATER / STRUCTURE RELATIONSHIP

CURRENT WATER LEVEL

WATER LEVEL

WATER/LAND

LAND

+ 5’-0” + 10’-0” + 15’-0” + 25’-0”

Page 9: Architectural Portfolio

Prevention Education Protection

1 5

3 7

1

4

2 6

PROGRAM ALLOCATION

1. CORE

- Main Atrium

- Emergency Shelter

- Main Circulation

2. LIBRARY WING

- Library

- 4D Simulation Room

- Fire Prevention Games

- Rain/Quake Simulation

3. UNDERWATER ATRIUM

- Light/Water Well

- Visitor Area

- Meeting Area

4. ADMINISTRATION

- Admin Room

- Conference Hall

- OKice Space

5. MAIN ENTRANCE

- Entrance

- Lobby

- Training Evaluation

- Orientation

- Cafe

- Children’s Area

6. PLANETARIUM WING

- Planetarium

- Seminar Training Halls

- First Aid Training Room

- Fire Fighting Training

7. STAFF ATRIUM

- Light/Water Well

- Employee Common Area

- Meeting Area

- Liquefaction/Quake

Mech Experiment Room

- Emergency Room

FOCUS ON THREE CORE ASPECTS

The program of Puget Point revolves around three fundamental

principles: Prevention, Education, and Protection. It is designed to

encompass the past, present, and future welfare of the general

public.

Page 10: Architectural Portfolio

1. 4D Simulation Room

2. Smoke Maze Room

11. Children’s Area

3. Planetarium

4. Planetarium Storage

5. Desk Storage

6. Planetarium Desk

7. Liquefaction/Quake Mech

Experiment Room

8. Emergency Communication

Experiment Room

9. Medical Room

10. Restaurant

12. Public Tourist Atrium

15/16. Rainstorm/Quake

Simulation Room

13. Conference Room

14. Administrative Work Area

17. Fire Prevention Game Stations

18. First Aid Training Room

19. Storage

11

1 2

3

4 56

7 8

9

10

12

15/16

19

18

13

14

17

-20’-0” BELOW WATER LEVEL (BWL) -10’-0” (BWL) WATER LEVEL

6. Planetarium Desk

7. Liquefaction/Quake Mech

Experiment Room

10

12

15

PLANS

Page 11: Architectural Portfolio

20. Orientation Area

21. Performance Evaluation

22. Seminar Training Area

23. Fire;ghting Training Room

24. Meeting Terrace

25. Storage

26. Cafe

27. Orientation / Lobby

22. Seminar Training Area

27. Orientation / Lobby

28. Library

24

23

22

2525

26

2721

20

22

22

28

27

+15’-0” ABOVE WATER LEVEL (AWL) +25’-0” AWL

PLANS

Page 12: Architectural Portfolio

SECTION A

SECTION B

SECTIONS

Page 13: Architectural Portfolio

SECTION C

SECTION D

SECTIONS

Page 14: Architectural Portfolio

points of interest (upper levels)

points of interest (lower levels)

points of interest (bike lane)

interior circulation

exterior circulation

LEFT: Glass curtain wall / Structure RelationshipTOP/RIGHT: Exterior & Interior CirculationBOTTOM/RIGHT: Basic Structure Formation

SKIN / FRAME

LIBRARY WING /

MAIN ENTRANCE /

UNDERWATER ATRIUM

PLANETARIUM WING /

ADMINISTRATION /

STAFF ATRIUM

UNDERWATER STRUCTURAL

FRAMING

Page 15: Architectural Portfolio
Page 16: Architectural Portfolio
Page 17: Architectural Portfolio

A+C design school

As designers, the process of

creating, improving,

discovering, and

experiencing is often taken

for granted. The art world

as we know it, is select and

exclusive. Few are fortunate

enough to be inspired and

even fewer are inspirations.

Downtown Los Angeles is

experiencing a gentri>cation

that could be an opportunity

to experience both.

A+C Design School is

intended to have a multitude

of programs that are

centered around the Arts.

From Childrens Arts and

Crafts to the highest level

of Culinary Training. In the

spirit of acceptance, the

Doors nearest to the public

pedestrian walkway are

purposely left exposed.

Inviting and bright.

Los Angeles, California

The structure of the build-

ing is intended to be both

functional and experiential.

Constantly casting dynamic

shadows and allowing

pedestrians to physically

interact with the buildings

“bones”.

A+C strays from its

surrounding buildings.

Escaping the monotonous

elegance of downtown

buildings while nodding to

the Bradbury Building across

the street with an open

central atrium that borrows

its illumination from the

sun.

The program is a gradient of

densities from sparce on the

lower Doors to dense towards

the top due to the programs

need for privacy at the

uppermost Door.

Page 18: Architectural Portfolio

envelope

site map voronoistructure

/oor plates

proposedstructure

streetlevel

2nd level

3rdlevel

4thlevel

Page 19: Architectural Portfolio

Program allocation &Proximity studies - Hierarchy of program - Usage - Vantage Points - Accessibility - Entertainment

Structural Determination - Language - Purpose - Functionality - Experience - Flexibility

Target Audience - Students - Faculty - Pedestrians - Cyclists - TouristsPoint of Convergence - Atrium

The open air atrium illumi-nates every unit within the structure. The ground Foor is open to pedestrians with high transparancy for viewing Work-shops.

structural study - south view

structural study - west view

ence

nates every unit within the structure. The ground Foor is open to pedestrians with high transparancy for viewing Work-shops.

- - - -

ogram allocation &oximity studies

Hierarchy of program

ProgProx -

Structural Determination - Language - Purpose

Target Audience - Students - Faculty

Pedestrians

public / sales

public / sales

admin / oJices

admin / oJices

classrooms

classrooms

classrooms

storage /

workshop area

storage /

workshop areastorage /

workshop area

private living

quarters

public / sales

PUBLIC: 62.5%

/ PRIVATE: 37.5%

PUBLIC: 62.5%

/ PRIVATE: 37.5%

PUBLIC: 0%

/ PRIVATE: 100%

PUBLIC: 25%

/ PRIVATE: 75%

1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor 4th Floor

Th ir triu illumi

Page 20: Architectural Portfolio

2’ 4’ 8’ 16’ 2’ 4’ 8’ 16’

PLANS

1. Store

2. Material Storage

3. Reception

4. Registration O6ice

5. Gift Shop

6. Locker Room (M)

7. Locker Room (F)

8. Student Foyer

9. Outdoor Seating

10. Directors O6ice

11. Conference Room

1. 6.

7.

8.

2.

9.

10.

11.

2.

3. 4.

A

A

BB

A

A

BB

PLAN @ 6’-0” PLAN @ 18’-0”

Page 21: Architectural Portfolio

2’ 4’ 8’ 16’ 2’ 4’ 8’ 16’

PLANS

12. Fabrication Stage

13. Classroom (Hands On)

14. Restroom (M)

15. Restroom (F)

16. Guest Instructor Living

Quarters

17. Classroom

18. Restaurant

19. Common Area

A

A

BB

A

A

BB

12.12.12.

12.

12.

12. 12.

14. 15.

13.

13.

13.

19.

16. 16.

17. 17. 17.

18.

17.

16.

16.

9.

PLAN @ 36’-0” PLAN @ 51’-0”

Page 22: Architectural Portfolio

SECTIONS

2’ 4’ 8’ 16’ 2’ 4’ 8’ 16’SECTION A

Broadway Blvd

SECTION B

Page 23: Architectural Portfolio
Page 24: Architectural Portfolio

TOP/LEFT: View into Vertial Circulation from Workshop.ABOVE: View down to Vertical Circulation from Outdoor Seating @ Restaurant.BOTTOM/LEFT: View up from Main AtriumLEFT: View from 3rd St, LA, CA - North.

Page 25: Architectural Portfolio
Page 26: Architectural Portfolio

Collaborative Project Design Team Instructor - Shashi Caan Participants: Donghia Masters Class (14)

Timeframe Project Conception - Completion: 10 Days

Page 27: Architectural Portfolio

re.LAX

The 21st Century has devel-

oped into a period where

people are surrounded by

technology and design.

Design, as an essential

component of the creative

industry, has become a ne-

cessity today. Designers work

to help understand, address,

and improve the “human con-

dition”. The objective of the

2013 Donghia Master Class

was to address the issues of

the “human condition” which

involves the quality of

life, wellbeing, and

happiness.

With an in-depth discussion,

the general agreement was

that all three issues are

important. Opinions were put

forth stating that quality

of life was not related to

happiness and that people

don’t need the quality of

life (QOL) to be happy;

while QOL and wellbeing,

together, shape society and

culture

Los Angeles, California

acting as tools to happi-

ness. The one fundamental

question was “What does it

mean to be happy?” Happi-

ness, as discussed, was what

allowed people to “do

better” and have a “peace of

mind”.

There are three things

people can not live without:

the human body – the physi-

cal machine that allows

people to experience, the

brain – what allows people

to think and function, and

the heart – the mind of the

soul. Just as those three

make up a person, quality of

life, wellbeing, and happi-

ness combined make up the

human condition that people

live and breathe. With that

the group continued to fur-

ther address three addition-

al critical issues informing

the project: mobility, densi-

ty, and work/play.

Page 28: Architectural Portfolio

PLAYA VISTA

MARINA DEL REY

LAX AIRPORT

WESTCHESTER

WETLANDS

BUTTERFLY

RESERVATION

AREA

SITE ANALYSIS

As both the qualitative (human

condition) and the quantitative

(issues) criteria began to shape

the direction of the project goals,

a site was necessary. The group

came to a general consensus that

the site would be located some-

where near OTIS College of Art and

Design due to the relationship the

team had with the area. Further

research or site analysis was done

to help narrow down possible op-

tions for a proposal of the site.

The site analysis, speciEcally

the demographics research, provid-

ed important information that

helped to determine the site. The

demographics research indicated a

distinct border between two commu-

nities: a community populated by

older people with higher income

and a community populated by a

younger generation with lower

income working at or near LAX. The

results of the site analysis helped

to determine criteria for the site

selection which consisted of:

- To End a place that can

enhance the livelihood of the

diversity of the demographics and

create a densiEcation where the

diJerent age groups and the cre-

ative community can interact.

- A site that can provide

accessibility to LAX and OTIS Col-

lege of Art and Design.

The site that best Ets into the

criteria was the plot of land next

to OTIS, which the airport owns

and have plans for development.

Additional challenges the project was required to address were the revitalization of the

community by gathering people at a central place and thereby, raise the quality of life

for all. The challenge of drawing people into a central meeting place, as inspired by the

idea of a “watering hole” or a natural place to gravitate, was usually identiEed as a

place to be occupied. This void then proposed couple project concepts which involve a

radial/nodal organization, which addresses the challenge of bringing people to a central

meeting and destination point. The second concept involves the project being a temporari-

ly permanent place, which would accommodate both the constantly transient nature of the

LAX population and the Exed or more permanent nature of the Westchester population.

Page 29: Architectural Portfolio

The goal of creating a diversity and density within the site started to deter-

mine di5erent “nodes” or points of interest near the site or within the city.

The connections to the di5erent “nodes” are critical:

- The Beach – is a public attraction and yet there was no former connection

from the neighborhood.

- Downtown – is important as a cultural community that’s distinctive of Los

Angeles and showcases the busy city life of LA that also ties in the Hollywood

culture.

- Culver City – provides accessibility to the di5erent amenities and will

help to revitalize the community.

- The Wetlands – allows for a fresh, natural, and unique place that can

showcase environmental maturity and progression.

- LAX – is the gateway to the world that allows for a global connection and

becomes the income source to the site, also allowing the site to help brand LA.

initial sketchestransporation pod

Page 30: Architectural Portfolio

Collaborative Project Design Team Head Designer - Matthew Gillis Project Designers: Derek Yi Rodrigo Zayas Dami Kim Lori Choi Ashley Lim

Timeframe Design Development 2 Months Fabrication 2 Weeks

Page 31: Architectural Portfolio

2x8 TAUT

For the ten-year anniversary

celebration show of the AIA

event 2x8, an exhibit design

competition, Matthew Gillis

was selected as the designer

of the exhibition. Matthew

Gillis is the principal of

G I L L I S, a design studio

of architecture and

interiors in Los Angeles.

His work integrates ecologi-

cal research, digital

design, and architectural

fabrication to create

sensually dense environments

and experiences.

The exhibit creates an

identity through two

contradictory elements, the

discrete and the homogenized

or the individual and the

community.

Twenty-four independent

projects from twelve partic-

ipating architecture schools

are displayed in discrete

two foot by four foot dis-

plays.

Los Angeles, California

In opposition to a typical

exhibit where displays are

placed at the periphery or

minimized into thin screens

accommodating an open free

space plan, the 2x8 exhibit

aggregates mass to intensify

spatial individuality

engendering a terrain of

contemporary academic

trends. Six masses cull the

twenty-four displays into

four project display or two

school modules. Dynamic

adjacencies between the

aggregated masses are uniIed

into a collective entity,

made monolithic by a

continuous plastic skin.

Chromatic intensities within

the skin amass to provide

relief and grain feeds back

into reading tensions

between the discrete modules

and the homogenizing skin as

TAUT.

Page 32: Architectural Portfolio

Interior plywood light box displays

were stacked, staggered and screwed

together to create the aggregated

masses. Polyethylene sheets were

cut into two patterned sheets for

each mass based on both digital and

physical models of a variety of

aggregations. Seams and darts were

heat welded on the patterns, then

pulled loosely over the masses and

heat shrunk using an industrial

propane gun. Back-lit Durst panels

mounted on acrylic were printed by

ARC and the Cuorescent back lights

donated by Barco Lighting. Loose

“umbilical cords” or clear PVC

tubing electrically connects each

mass to the existing track lighting

grid. 2x8 committee members sten-

ciled a graphic Jeld of the exhibit

name on the west wall of the museum

space providing additional texture

and scalar play with the exhibit

design.

typical displayelevations

typical displayunit dimensionplan

Page 33: Architectural Portfolio
Page 34: Architectural Portfolio

Professional Project Architect: Nakada+AssociatesClient: The KOR GroupStatus: Completed 2014Completion Date: July 2014Building Type: 5B

Project Team:Nakada+Associates Derek Yi - Project Designer

Involvement Design Development Construction Documentation Construction Administration

2014 Los Angeles Architectural Award

Housing Award - Multi-family (Market Rate): Barker Block Warehouse No.1.

Page 35: Architectural Portfolio

Barker Block

The Barker Bros. Building

was once a storage facility

for the furniture department

store company Barker Broth-

ers. It then was abandoned

for nearly 20 years before

recent gentri=cation of the

Arts District in Downtown

Los Angeles. The intent

behind The Barker Block is

to create a space in which

artists or creative minds

would be able to freely

manipulate based on their

needs and wants.

Due to the large size of

this project, the contstruc-

tion process was divided

into four diEerent phases

that focused on individual

buildings.

The structures that congre-

gate together to become

Barker Block all have sig-

ni=cant history in

Los Angeles, California

ADAPTIVE RE-USE ProjectDesign Build

Los Angeles and one of the

goals was to enrich the past

rather than to erase it.

Much of the original =nishes

are kept intact and the

residents are presented with

tangible structure from the

original building within

their own units. All struc-

tural elements have been

modernized and brought up to

the regulations of City

Building Code.

Because Barker Block is

geared towards the artist,

there is an in-house gallery

with work from local artists

as well as a large open

court space directly adja-

cent to a retail area which

now is a high end restau-

rant. Currently all condo-

miniums in the complex are

sold out.

Page 36: Architectural Portfolio

arartitititistststststststst a a a a a a alllllllllllllllleyeyeyeyeyeyeyey u u undndndndndndndndndererererererererererer c cononononononstststststststststruruructctctioioionnn

scscscalale e e momomomomodedel view (N)N)N)N)

Page 37: Architectural Portfolio

Photo: 2014 L.A. Architectural Awards

completed - arartitistst a alley cococococompmpmpmpmpmpmpmpmpmpleleleleleleleleteteteteteteteteted d d d d d d d d d d - viviviviviviewewewew ( ( ( (N)N)N)N)

ininteteririoror - - - r r resesesidididenentitial h h halalallwayayay

cocococococompmpmpmpmpmpleleleleleleleleleteted : gagagagagagagagallllerererery y y y y spspspspace

Page 38: Architectural Portfolio

Professional Project Architect: Nakada+AssociatesClient: The KOR GroupStatus: Under ConstructionCompletion Date: 2015 (3rd Q)Building Type: 1A

Project Team:Principal: Steven NakadaArchitect: Edward KonoProject Designer: Derek YiProject Designer: Annie LinProject Designer: Rodrigo Zayas

Involvement Schematic Design Design Development Construction Documentation Construction Administration

Page 39: Architectural Portfolio

100 LBB

To be environmentally

friendly and leaving the

smallest carbon footprint,

has been somewhat of a co-

nundrum for the general

public. Hybrid vehicles,

solar panels and recycling

are all words that have been

thrown around to describe,

idealistically, what a

person could do to be more

“green”. There are issues to

these ideas, however. It is

a proven fact that driving

an old vehicle till its

death is signi>cantly green-

er than selling an old

clunker and buying a new

hybrid vehicle due to the

chemical emissions of the

manufacturing process. Addi-

tionally, the sold vehicle

will once again be driven by

another user or scrapped.

Both of which are not envi-

ronmentally friendly. Solar

panels, while they do

Long Beach, California

ADAPTIVE RE-USE ProjectDesign Build

the edison

produce energy, are diCicult

to dispose once the lifespan

is over.

One way that I believe de-

signers and architects could

contribute to being greener

is to take older used build-

ings and repurpose them to

serve another function,

therefore extending the

lifespan of a structure much

like driving an old clunker

to the ground. It also is

bene>cial if the newly pro-

grammed building proves to

be a catalyst for gentri>ca-

tion or bridging two diverse

cultures.

This project proves to serve

as both a cultural bridge

between an Older Long Beach

City and a rather New one.

It also revitalizes a rather

abandoned area of a Kourish-

ing city.

Page 40: Architectural Portfolio

exit stair-well / stripped core tytytytypipipicacacacal totowewer r 1o1o1ooror slalalalalalalalalalalalalalabbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb

mememezzzzzzzzzzanananine e lelelelelevevel l l l l cacacacatwtwtwtwtwtwtwtwtwtwalalalalalalalalalalalkkkkk

100 Long Beach Blvd, aka the Edison Building

and City Hall East, is located on the northeast

corner of Long Beach Blvd and 1st St. The

building site consists of a 10-story steel

frame oAice tower of approximately 143,000 GSF

and an adjacent 4-split level 153 stall park-

ingstructure built in the 1960’s. The building

is a prominent mid-century modern oAice build-

ing designed by renowned Long Beach architect,

Kenneth S Wing, Sr. FAIA.

Page 41: Architectural Portfolio

ststststststststststststststrururuructctctctctctctctctctcturururururururururalalalalalalalalalalalalalal c c cononononononononononononononononnenenenenenenenenectctctctctctctctctctctctctctctioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioioionsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsns mamamainin elelevavavatotor shshshafafaft (s(strtripipippepepeped)d)d)

cucucucucucucucucucucucucurtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtrtaiaiaiaiaiaiaiaiaiaiaiaiaiain-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-wwwwwwwwwwwalalalalalalalalalalalall l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l glglglglglglglglglglglglglglglglazazazazingngngngngngngngngngng m m mock-k-k-upup

The building is sited on a rectangular corner

parcel with approximately 150’ of frontage

along Long Beach Blvd and 250’ along 1st St for

a total of 37,500 SF. The site is zoned PD-30,

downtown Planned Development District, and is

also designated under the City’s General Plan

Area 7 as “Mixed Use” which includes residen-

tial, commercial oPice, retail and restaurant

uses.

CHANGES:

The Ground Floor uses will primarily be resi-

dential townhome or live/work units along Long

Beach Blvd or 1st St with residential amenities

within the North Pavilion.

The Typical Floors are converted from 11,800 SF

of former commercial space to residential

units ranging from studio units to two bedroom

units.

A new Penthouse Level is also constructed

along with a roof top terrace, lap pool and

lounge area.

Page 42: Architectural Portfolio

view: W/S

view: S/E

PROJECT DATA

Page 43: Architectural Portfolio

While the majority of the original building from 1959 is kept intact and reused, the

penthouse level with the pool deck and the Common Lounge is to be added as a complete-

ly new structure. In order to achieve this, the original elevator machine room located

on the roof had to be removed and a new slab was put in. The slab was then raised to

match the existing parapet level thus creating an interstitial space that is used for

HVAC units as well as new elevator machine closets for the newly added machine

room-less elevators. The elevation of the new Loor slab is done using stilts and steel

reinforcement to mitigate dynamic forces that would be applied to the new Penthouse

Floor.

Page 44: Architectural Portfolio

Figure Studies

Page 45: Architectural Portfolio

Figure Studies

Personal Work

grgrapaphihitete / / c chaharcrcoaoal l onon brown bututchcherer p papaperer3 3 hrhrss

Page 46: Architectural Portfolio

grgrapaphihihitete / / c c chaharcrcoaoal l onon b brorownwn b bututchchcherer p papapaperer5 hrhrss

To understand the human -gure, one must -rst

have a grasp on the anatomy of the human

body including major bones, muscles, connec-

tion points, and weight.

In all the sketches, the general outlines of

the aforementioned should be readily visible

as well as sighting lines and contour lines.

Page 47: Architectural Portfolio

5 5 hrss 5 hrhrsgrgrapaphihitete / / c chaharcrcoal ononon bonond d d papapeper grgraphite / c chaharcoal l on bond papapepepeperrrr

Page 48: Architectural Portfolio
Page 49: Architectural Portfolio

resumeD e r e k Y iYiDerekH@gmai l .com323 . 333 . 3765

EDUCATION 2009 -

2013

EXPERIENCE 2013 -

2014

Otis College of Art and Design BFA - Architecture / Landscape / Inter iors

Nakada+Associates Project Designer Involved in al l aspects of a project - Schematic Design - Design Development - Construct ion Documentat ion - Construct ion Administrat ion - RFI / City Submittal

Jul ius Shulman Emerging Talent Award Nominee

2006 -

2009

Santa Monica College AA - Pol i t ical Economy

2002 -

2006

Loyola High School High School Diploma

AWARDS

2012

2013

I IDA : Bright Ideas In the Spotl ight / Ris ing Stars - Competit ion Publ icat ion

PUBLICATIONS 2013

Metropolis Mag Point of View - Student Works Publ icat ion

2013

AIA 1:2 Student Charette Competition : The Hil l 3rd - $4,000

2013

Calibre25 Student Scholarship Awards I IDA 2nd - $4,000

2013

Otis Named Scholarship $20,000

2011 -

2013

Alexis Riekeman Scholarship $2,700

2010 -

2011

Ben Maltz Scholarship $10,000

2009 -

2010

G I L L I S Intern 2x8 AIA : TAUT (2012) Los Angeles, CA - Design Mock up test ing - F loor-plan Development - Digita l Model Fabricat ion - F inal Fabricat ion

EXHIBITIONS 2013

SOFTWARE

HARDWARE

adobe

Dwell on Design - Young Guns Gallery LA Convention Center - Student Work

Photoshop, I l lustrator , InDesign

autodesk AutoCAD, Revit

chaos group Vray for Rhino & Sketchup

google Sketchup

mcneel Rhino

microsoft

grasshopper

3D / CAD

saws

sanding

mill ing

Grasshopper 3D, Weaverbird

Rapid Prototyping, Laser Cutt ing

Band-Saw, Table-Saw, Ski l l -Saw, J ig-Saw

Vert ical / Osci l lat ing

CNC

2013 Dwell on Design LA Convention Center - Student Work

2013 Venice Art Crawl Venice, CA - Student Work


Top Related