deep mantle matters
TRANSCRIPT
DOI: 10.1126/science.1254399, 800 (2014);344 Science
Quentin WilliamsDeep mantle matters
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only.
clicking here.colleagues, clients, or customers by , you can order high-quality copies for yourIf you wish to distribute this article to others
here.following the guidelines
can be obtained byPermission to republish or repurpose articles or portions of articles
): May 27, 2014 www.sciencemag.org (this information is current as of
The following resources related to this article are available online at
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/344/6186/800.full.htmlversion of this article at:
including high-resolution figures, can be found in the onlineUpdated information and services,
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/344/6186/800.full.html#relatedfound at:
can berelated to this article A list of selected additional articles on the Science Web sites
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/344/6186/800.full.html#ref-list-1, 6 of which can be accessed free:cites 12 articlesThis article
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/collection/geochem_physGeochemistry, Geophysics
subject collections:This article appears in the following
registered trademark of AAAS. is aScience2014 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science; all rights reserved. The title
CopyrightAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published weekly, except the last week in December, by theScience
on
May
27,
201
4w
ww
.sci
ence
mag
.org
Dow
nloa
ded
from
o
n M
ay 2
7, 2
014
ww
w.s
cien
cem
ag.o
rgD
ownl
oade
d fr
om
on
May
27,
201
4w
ww
.sci
ence
mag
.org
Dow
nloa
ded
from
800 23 MAY 2014 • VOL 344 ISSUE 6186 sciencemag.org SCIENCE
INSIGHTS | PERSPECTIVES
ILL
US
TR
AT
ION
: A
DA
PT
ED
FR
OM
E.
GA
RN
ER
O
The lower mantle, lying between ~670-
and ~2890-km depth, comprises most
of the rocky portion of Earth. Convec-
tion processes within this region trans-
fer heat from the iron core upward,
advecting the heat flow that drives
the near-surface tectonic engine. As many
of the largest volcanic events appear to be
correlated with seismic features in the deep
mantle ( 1), the deep lower mantle may also
represent an occasional scourge of our sur-
face environment. In this issue, two sets of
challenging experiments yield new pictures
for how different deep seismic anomalies
might be generated. On page 892, Andrault
et al. ( 2) examine the melting temperature of
oceanic crust (basalt) to core-mantle bound-
ary (CMB) pressures and temperature, and
use that to explain the genesis of areas with
ultralow seismic velocities near the CMB. On
page 877, Zhang et al. ( 3) report the startling
discovery of a new, iron-rich silicate phase
that may be a major component of the lower-
most ~700 km of Earth’s mantle.
Seismic probing has led to a richness of
phenomena being recognized in the inacces-
sible lowermost ~1000 km of Earth’s mantle
(see the figure). Large, blocky structures
beneath Africa and the Pacific with a ~3%
decrease in shear velocity extend up to 1000
km above the CMB (large low-shear-velocity
provinces, LLSVPs) ( 4). Regions with almost
horizontal discontinuities in seismic velocity
~100 to 300 km are present above the CMB
with velocity jumps of 2 to 3% ( 5) (these dis-
continuities define the anomalous D� zone at
the base of the mantle). There are also re-
gions with large reductions in compressional
and shear wave velocity in sporadic places in
the lowermost ~5 to 40 km of the mantle,
with shear velocity decreases as large as 45%
( 6) (ultralow-velocity zones, ULVZs). But all
of these features are volumetrically small
relative to the bulk of the mantle (LLSVPs
are at most a few percent of the lower man-
tle volume, while ULVZs represent a small
fraction of a percent). These features reside
within a lower mantle that has long been rec-
ognized to be dominated by a simple mix of
(Mg,Fe)SiO3-perovskite and (Mg,Fe)O [and
with possibly some exotic behavior associ-
ated with spin transitions in iron ( 7)].
Modeling and experiments at the extreme
pressures and temperatures of the deep
mantle (on the order of 100 GPa and 2000
K) reveal links between variations in phase,
composition, and temperature and the ob-
served seismic anomalies. One explanation
for LLSVPs is that they are associated with
slight iron and (Mg,Fe)SiO3 enrichment
( 8), the seismic discontinuities with a pres-
sure-induced transition from (Mg,Fe)SiO3-
perovskite to a post-perovskite structure
( 9), and the ULVZ with partial melting and
a possible increase in iron content ( 10). But
discerning how these anomalies are gener-
ated is difficult because our direct informa-
tion is confined to a seismic snapshot of the
present-day structure of this region.
The new studies provide process-oriented
constraints on the genesis of ULVZs and
chemical variations within the lowermost
mantle ( 2) and shift the view on the per-
ceived mineralogic simplicity of much of the
lower mantle ( 3). Andrault et al. study the
melting behavior of basalt (ocean crust) to
pressures of the CMB. Basalt is the lowest–
melting temperature rock likely to be present
near the CMB, and is expected to melt when
exposed to the temperatures of Earth’s outer
core ( 11). The picture that emerges is that
subducted plates may carry oceanic crust to
depths near the base of the mantle, where it
can partially melt, forming ULVZs. But An-
drault et al. propose that the melt can only
be retained within the unmelted residue of
the original basalt. Once it migrates into nor-
mal mantle, its chemistry is such that it will
react and form solid magnesian perovskite,
chemically remixing oceanic crust back into
the mantle. As a result, ULVZs should be gen-
erated from, and associated with, subducted
material at depth. Thus, the most abundant
magma at Earth’s surface may also produce
most of the melt near the bottom of Earth’s
rocky mantle—and plate tectonics may play a
fundamental role in the geochemistry of ma-
terial juxtaposed with Earth’s metallic core.
Zhang et al. observe the disproportion-
ation of (Mgx,Fe
1-x)SiO
3-perovskite (where
x within Earth’s mantle is ~0.9) to nearly
pure MgSiO3 and a new, iron-enriched ap-
proximately (Mg0.6
Fe0.4
)SiO3 phase. This “H-
phase” has a hexagonal structure and occurs
at pressures corresponding to depths greater
than ~2200 km. The synthesis of this phase
occurred at high temperatures (2200 K and
above), and this temperature and a low-
Deep mantle matters
Lower mantle
Outer core
ULVZ
CMB
1000 km
LLSVPPV
PPvD”
Disproportionation
reaction
The mantle region. Schematic of seismically characterized features occurring in the lowermost ~1000 km of Earth’s mantle, and experimentally proposed oceanic crustal-associated
ULVZ ( 2) and perovskite disproportionation boundary ( 3). (Note that the ULVZ vertical scale is exaggerated for visibility.) PV, perovskite; PPv, post-perovskite.
By Quentin Williams
Experiments reveal how some deep seismic anomalies near the core-mantle boundary might be generated
GEOPHYSICS
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Published by AAAS
23 MAY 2014 • VOL 344 ISSUE 6186 801SCIENCE sciencemag.org
The mammalian immune system both
suppresses and tolerates tumors, so
understanding this complexity should
benefit the development of cancer
therapies. Macrophages are proposed
to play an important role in suppress-
ing the immune response to cancer cells,
but it is not clear where these immune cells
come from or whether there are distinct
populations of macrophages with specific
roles in this setting. On page 921 of this is-
sue, Franklin et al. ( 1) forge a more coher-
ent view of macrophages that are associated
with tumor growth by assessing their ori-
gin, phenotype, and functions in an animal
model of breast cancer.
Tumor progression can be divided into
three phases—initiation, growth, and me-
tastasis (see the figure). The first phase is
characterized by the cell-autonomous accu-
mulation of genetic defects that leads to cell
transformation. This is followed by clonal
growth of transformed cells within the tis-
sue—the primary tumor site ( 2). Metastasis
results from the successful “engraftment”
of circulating tumor cells into secondary
locations where they proliferate after a
dormancy phase in which metastatic cells
remain quiescent ( 3). In both primary and
secondary tumor sites, the stroma, which
includes mesenchymal cells, macrophages,
and extracellular matrix (3), is thought to
play a role in the initial survival and prolif-
eration of transformed cells. However, as a
solid tumor grows and tumor cells acquire
the potential to escape the primary site, the
stroma becomes a more complex environ-
ment, with newly formed blood and lym-
phatic vessels and the recruitment and/or
proliferation of lymphoid and myeloid im-
mune cells ( 4). Immune cells are proposed
to prevent tumor progression via the elimi-
nation of immunogenic tumor cells by T
lymphocytes (CD8 subtype), a phenomenon
known as immunosurveillance (also called
immunoediting). During this process, tu-
mors that display either reduced immuno-
genicity or enhanced immunosuppressive
activity will escape elimination ( 5). Macro-
phages present in the tumor site can acti-
vate the immune response, but are mainly
thought to contribute to immunosuppres-
sion and tumor progression ( 6, 7), particu-
larly in the mammary gland ( 8). A high
density of macrophages in tumors is also
associated with worse overall survival in pa-
tients with gastric, urogenital, and head and
neck cancers, although it seems to be associ-
ated with better overall survival in patients
with colorectal cancer ( 7).
Franklin et al. carefully explore the con-
tribution of macrophages to tumor growth
in mice that develop a mammary cancer
that is genetically driven by the expres-
sion of an oncogene. In investigating the
development and differentiation of mac-
rophages in the normal mammary gland
and during the progression of a mammary
tumor, the authors identify a population of
macrophages that accumulates during tu-
mor growth called tumor-associated mac-
rophages (TAMs). These cells develop from
bone marrow–derived cells with the charac-
teristics of inflammatory monocytes, which
are recruited to the tumor where they differ-
entiate into macrophages and subsequently
proliferate. Franklin et al. observed that
when signaling by the protein Notch is pre-
vented in these TAMs, their differentiation
is blocked. Interestingly, TAMs are distinct
from macrophages present in normal mam-
mary tissue, which develop independently
of Notch signaling. Depletion of TAMs led to
a reduced tumor burden in the animal and
increased the cytotoxic potential of T lym-
phocytes present in the primary tumor site.
Thus, monocyte-derived Notch-dependent
TAMs are critical for tumor growth in this
mammary gland tumor model, at least in
Identifying the infiltrators
By Elisa Gomez Perdiguero and
Frederic Geissmann
Molecular characterization of macrophages reveals distinct types during tumorigenesis
CANCER IMMUNOLOGYstress environment appear to be critical for
synthesizing this phase.
So why has this new transition not been
observed seismically? One possibility is that
the velocity change across the transition may
be too small and/or the boundary may undu-
late dramatically in its depth. Alternatively,
the temperature of the deep mantle may lie
below the temperature of the disproportion-
ation reaction [which would require that the
mantle be a few hundred kelvin cooler than
currently inferred ( 12)—but this would also
imply that disproportionation could have
been important in the hotter past]. Another
option is that the oxidation state of iron in
the mantle may differ from those within the
experiments. The provocative aspects of this
discovery include not just changing the pos-
sible mineralogy of the deeper lower mantle,
but also that two phases of markedly differ-
ent densities are produced. Whether these
phases could undergo partial segregation,
thus enriching or depleting regions in the
H-phase (particularly in an earlier, hotter,
less viscous, and possibly partially molten
mantle), is unknown. If such segregation did
occur, a natural explanation for the genesis
of LLSVPs might exist. Depending on its elas-
ticity, an enrichment of H-phase within these
regions might provide an avenue to explain
their anomalous seismic signature.
Each of these experiments is the direct re-
sult of developments in high-pressure, high-
temperature techniques and the availability
of high-intensity synchrotron sources. Prob-
ing the sensitivity of the pressure and tem-
perature of melting and the phase transition
to variable oxygen fugacities, shifts in major
and minor elemental abundances, and vola-
tile contents holds the prospect of mapping
out the likely chemical behavior of the lower
mantle. In doing so, the current void of infor-
mation on the differentiation processes that
govern the chemical variations, structural
features, and evolution of Earth’s deepest
rocky reaches will be filled. ■
REFERENCES
1. J. Austermann et al., Geophys. J. Int. 197, 1 (2014). 2. D. Andrault et al., Science 344, 892 (2014). 3. L. Zhang et al., Science 344, 877 (2014). 4. S. Ni, D. V. Helmberger, J. Tromp, Geophys. J. Int. 161, 283
(2005). 5. M. Wysession et al., in The Core-Mantle Boundary Region,
M. Gurnis, M. Wysession, E. Knittle, B. Buffett, Eds., Geodyn. Ser. (American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, 1998), vol. 28, 319–334.
6. M. S. Thorne, E. J. Garnero, G. Jahnke, H. Igel, A. K. McNamara, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 364, 59 (2013).
7. J. F. Lin et al., Rev. Geophys. 51, 244 (2013). 8. F. Deschamps, L. Cobden, P. J. Tackley, Earth Planet. Sci.
Lett. 349-350, 198 (2012). 9. M. Murakami et al., Science 304, 855 (2004). 10. S. Rost et al., Nature 435, 666 (2005). 11. S. Anzellini et al., Science 340, 464 (2013). 12. T. Katsura, A. Yoneda, D. Yamazaki, T. Yoshino, E. Ito, Phys.
Earth Planet. Inter. 183, 212 (2010).
10.1126/science.1254399ILL
US
TR
AT
ION
: V
. A
LT
OU
NIA
N/SCIENCE
Published by AAAS