heritage, heritage tourism and climate change
TRANSCRIPT
For Peer Review
Heritage, Heritage Tourism and Climate Change
Journal: Journal of Heritage Tourism
Manuscript ID: Draft
Manuscript Type: Special Issue Paper
Keywords: cultural heritage, heritage tourism, climate change, natural heritage, emissions, IPCC
Abstract:
Climate change is increasingly recognised as a major threat to the sustainability of tourism, including heritage tourism. Yet despite growth in literature on climate change and heritage there is little specific literature on the relationship between climate change and heritage tourism. The paper introduces a special issue on heritage tourism and climate change. It briefly outlines the future challenges of climate change before commenting on tourism’s role in climate change and the challenge of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Using UNWTO tourism estimates a tentative figure of half of all emissions of tourism could be ascribed to heritage related tourism.
For Peer Review
Heritage, Heritage Tourism and Climate Change
Climate change is increasingly recognised as a major threat to the sustainability of
tourism, including heritage tourism. Yet despite growth in literature on climate change
and heritage there is little specific literature on the relationship between climate change
and heritage tourism. The paper introduces a special issue on heritage tourism and
climate change. It briefly outlines the future challenges of climate change before
commenting on tourism’s role in climate change and the challenge of reducing
greenhouse gas emissions. Using UNWTO tourism estimates a tentative figure of half of
all emissions of tourism could be ascribed to heritage related tourism.
Keywords: heritage tourism, climate change, cultural heritage, natural heritage,
emissions, IPCC
Heritage, Heritage Tourism and Climate Change
Climate change is increasingly recognised as a major threat to the sustainability of
tourism (Scott, 2011; Scott, Hall & Gössling, 2012). However, despite concerns over the
impact of climate change on heritage (Cassar, 2005; McIntyre-Tamwoy, 2008;
Brimblecombe, Grossi & Harris, 2011; Howard, 2013; Brimblecombe, 2014; Maus, 2014;
Perry, 2015; Phillips, 2015; Hall, Baird, James & Ram, 2016), there has been a surprising
dearth of literature on the interrelationships between climate change and heritage
tourism, and cultural heritage in particular.
Climate is generally defined as the weather averaged over a period of time, and
effectively represents the conditions one would anticipate experiencing at a specific
destination and time (IPCC, 2013a). Climate change is defined by the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which is the lead international
forum for developing an international response to climate change, as ‘a change of
climate which is attributed directly or indirectly to human activity that alters the
composition of the global atmosphere and which is in addition to natural climate
variability observed over comparable time periods’ (UNFCC, 1992, Article 1).
This special issue of the Journal of Heritage Tourism seeks to contribute to the
development of a critical mass of work with respect to how climate change may affect
heritage tourism as well as how heritage tourism may provide an opportunity to both
respond to and interpret the implications of climate change. This paper provides a brief
overview of the climate change and tourism relationship before outlining the contents of
this special issue.
Climate Change and the 2013 IPCC Assessment
The reality of climate change is no longer open to scientific dispute (Hall et al., 2015).
The most recent IPCC report on the physical science of climate change concluded in its
summary for policy makers ‘Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and since
the 1950s, many of the observed changes are unprecedented over decades to millennia.
The atmosphere and ocean have warmed, the amounts of snow and ice have diminished,
sea level has risen, and the concentrations of greenhouse gases have increased’ (IPCC,
2013a, p.2). The IPCC go on to emphasise ‘Human influence on the climate system is
clear. This is evident from the increasing greenhouse gas concentrations in the
Page 1 of 12
For Peer Review
atmosphere, positive radiative forcing, observed warming, and understanding of the
climate system’ (IPCC, 2013a, p.13).
In addition to assessing recent climate change the IPCC use a number of models to
project changes in the climate system. These are important not only because of their
assessment of potential environmental, economic, societal and political futures but also
because they act as important drivers for international climate change negotiations, and
therefore directly and indirectly influence the actions of industry, governments and
communities, including with respect to tourism. Table 1 indicates some of the key
findings of the IPCC (2013a, 2013b) with respect to future global and regional climate
change. (For a further analysis of the implications of the most recent IPCC assessment
for tourism see Scott, Hall and Gössling (2016), while Hall and Ram (2016) indicate the
position of heritage within the IPCC reports).
<INSERT TABLE 1 ABOUT HERE>
Tourism and Climate Change
The impacts and science of climate change presents a number of significant challenges
for tourism with respect to its effects on destinations, infrastructure and resources,
generating regions, competitiveness and tourist flows and behaviours as well as
adaptation and mitigation (Gössling & Hall, 2006a; Hall, 2010c; Scott & Becken, 2011;
Scott, Hall & Gössling, 2012; Gössling, Scott & Hall, 2013; Scott, Steiger, Rutty & Johnson,
2014). There is a growing awareness of tourism impacts and the tensions that may exist
in attempting to balance economic development with social and environmental goals
(Scott, Hall & Gössling, 2012; Gössling Scott & Hall, 2013; Haanpää, Juhola & Landauer,
2014). Undoubtedly, the relationship between tourism and climate change reflects some
of the issues faced by other industries and economic sectors (Parry et al., 2007).
However, tourism also has specific characteristics and peculiarities that demand its own
mitigation and adaptation response (Scott, Hall & Gössling, 2012; Scott, Gössling & Hall,
2012; Kaján & Saarinen, 2013; Scott, Gössling, Hall & Peeters, 2016). These include
tourism’s significant role in less developed countries (Hall, 2007; Gössling, Peeters &
Scott, 2008; Gössling, Hall & Scott 2009; Moore, 2010; Pentelow & Scott, 2011) and
biodiversity conservation (Hall, 2010a; Hall, Scott & Gössling, 2011; Zeppell, 2012), as
well as the role of climate, environment, risk and security in influencing tourist travel
patterns (Gössling & Hall, 2006b; Hall, 2010b, 2013; Gössling et al., 2012).
As with other economic sectors tourism therefore both contributes to and is affected by
climate change. However, tourism is often regarded as being among the more
vulnerable sectors because of its dependence on the environment as a factor in the
attractiveness of destinations, although the long term effects of climate change on
tourist decision-making is relatively unknown given the adaptive capacity of tourists
(Gössling, Scott, Hall, Ceron & Dubois, 2012), while there are also significant regional
and sub-sectoral knowledge gaps (Hall, 2008; Scott, Hall & Gössling, 2016).
Tourism and travel contribute to climate change through emissions of greenhouse gases
(GHGs), including in particular CO2, as well as methane (CH4), nitrous oxides (NOx),
hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs) and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6).
There are also various short-lived GHGs that are important in the context of aviation
Page 2 of 12
For Peer Review
(Lee et al., 2009). Because tourism is not recognised within existing industrial
classification schemes, estimating tourism-related emissions is requires the integration
of information on the range of components that comprise the tourism system. Tourism
transport, accommodation and activities are estimated by independent assessments for
the UNWTO-UNEP-WMO (2008) and World Economic Forum (WEF) (2009) to
contribute approximately five per cent to global anthropogenic emissions of CO2 in the
year 2005. Most CO2 emissions are associated with transport, with aviation accounting
for 40% of tourism’s overall carbon footprint, followed by car transport (32%) and
accommodation (21%) (UNWTO-UNEP-WMO 2008). Cruise ships, with an estimated
19.2 Mt CO2, account for approximately 1.5% of global tourism emissions (Eijgelaar,
Thaper & Peeters, 2010). However, and very importantly, the UNWTO-UNEP-WMO
(2008) and WEF (2009) assessments of tourism’s contribution to climate change do not
include the impact of non-CO2 short-lived GHGs. A more accurate assessment of
tourism’s contribution to global warming should include the influence of radiative
forcing (RF) (IPCC, 2013b). Given the range of uncertainty with respect to RF, especially
for aviation emissions, Scott, Peeters and Gössling (2010) estimated that tourism
contributed between 5.2% to 12.5% of all anthropogenic forcing in 2005, with a best
estimate of approximately eight per cent (Gössling, Scott & Hall, 2013). In addition, a
more complete analysis would also have to include food and beverage (Gössling & Hall,
2013), infrastructure construction and maintenance, as well as tourist retail and
services; all of these ideally including a lifecycle perspective accounting for the energy
embodied in the goods and services consumed in tourism (Gössling, 2010, 2013;
Gössling, Scott & Hall, 2013).
The exact proportion of global tourism that can be attributed to heritage tourism is
unknown. However, the UNWTO (2004) have claimed that cultural tourism accounts for
between 35 and 40 per cent of all tourism worldwide and that it is growing much faster
than the rate of growth for general tourism (Failte Ireland, 2006). Although such
estimates are difficult to validate, it does nevertheless point to the significant
contribution that cultural heritage tourism makes to tourism GHG emissions, a figure
that would go significantly higher if natural heritage tourism, which would include
national park and protected area visitation and much ecotourism (Frost & Hall, 2009),
were also to be included in heritage tourism’s contribution (Hall, 2010a), then the figure
could approach half of all tourism if using UNWTO estimates.
The challenge of managing tourism’s future emissions development is enormous given
forecast growth (Hall, 2015). Emissions from tourism will grow because of several
trends, including the growing number of people travelling, increasing frequency of trips,
as well as growth in the average length of trips made, and the growing energy intensity
of the transport modes used, with most of the growth occurring in air travel (Peeters &
Landré, 2011; Scott, Hall & Gössling, 2012; Gössling, Scott & Hall, 2013; Peeters &
Bongaerts, 2015). For example, the International Energy Agency (IEA, 2009) suggests
that air travel will almost quadruple between 2005-2050, with a tripling of energy use
and emissions. Even if the per capita per trip contribution of tourists to GHG emissions
continues to fall as a result of increased efficiencies from technological and management
innovations, as suggested by the UNWTO, WEF, WTTC and IATA, the absolute
contribution will continue to grow as a result of tourism mobility increasing at a faster
rate than efficiency gains (Gössling, Hall, Peeters & Scott, 2010; Hall, 2010c).
Furthermore, there is little consideration of the implications of rebound effects in
forecasts of tourism’s future emissions, even though they could potentially means that
by 2030 the impacts of energy-efficiencies on emissions reduction are potentially be
Page 3 of 12
For Peer Review
more than halved and that the reduction in the potential gains in energy efficiencies
over the period to 2035 are cut by more than 35% (Hall, Scott & Gössling, 2013).
Based on a business-as-usual scenario for 2035, which considers changes in travel
frequency, length of stay, travel distance and technological efficiency gains, UNWTO-
UNEP-WMO (2008) calculate that CO2 emissions from tourism may grow considerably
by 2035. The scenario shows that emissions will increase by about 135 per cent
compared with 2005 (UNWTO-UNEP-WMO 2008), reaching 3059 Mt CO2 by 2035.
These estimates can be compared with a projection for emission growth by the World
Economic Forum (WEF, 2009), which estimates that CO2 emissions from tourism
(excluding aviation) will grow at 2.5% per year until 2035, and emissions from aviation
at 2.7%, which suggests emissions of 3164 Mt CO2 by 2035 (Table 2) (Gössling, Scott &
Hall, 2013).
<INSERT TABLE 2 ABOUT HERE>
Any systematic approach to mitigation needs to be based on a review of emission
intensities (Scott, Hall & Gössling, 2012), meaning an assessment of where emissions
occur as well as an identification of where further growth occurs, possibly in
combination with an evaluation of the underlying reasons for this growth (Scott, Hall, &
Gössling, 2016). This is a significant issue as Scott, Peeters and Gössling (2010) calculate
that even if emissions increases from accommodation and all transport except aviation
fell to zero, overall emissions would still increase, given the strong growth in air travel.
Similarly, out of 26 mitigation scenarios developed by UNWTO-UNEP-WMO (2008), only
one yields absolute emission reductions. This is a scenario combining high energy-
efficiency gains with considerable modal shifts, changes in the choice of destinations,
and increases in average length of stay. The results indicate that only strong pressure on
the subsectors to become more energy efficient via, for example, new forms of carbon
governance, combined with behavioural and structural change in tourism consumption
with respect to where and how people travel, will lead to absolute reductions in
emissions (Gössling, Scott & Hall, 2013; Hall, 2013). Interestingly, Scott, Gössling, Hall
and Peeters’ (2016) suggest that investment in emissions abatement within the tourism
sector combined with strategic external carbon offsets is far more cost effective over
2015-2050 than exclusive reliance on offsetting. They argue that the cost to achieve the -
50% target in GHG emissions through abatement and strategic offsetting, while
significant, represents less than 0.1% of the total estimated global tourism economy in
2020 and only 2.0% in 2050. As they point out, such costs, if distributed equally among
international tourists, are equivalent to many current departure taxes and baggage fees,
and would seem to be a low price to pay for the potential benefits, including with
respect to the conservation of heritage.
Conclusion
The papers in this special issue provide a number of perspectives on the
interrelationships between heritage tourism and climate change. The first paper by Hall,
Baird, James and Ram (2016) provides a review of some of the main themes with
respect to climate change and the conservation of cultural heritage, especially built
heritage, cultural landscapes and heritage management responses. Issues of built
heritage are also examined by Coles, Dinan and Warren (2016) in examining the
adaptation responses of accommodation providers in historic properties in the UK.
Page 4 of 12
For Peer Review
The impact of climate change on heritage can also be used as a means to both reflect on
the nature of heritage but also to interpret anthropogenic change. Mimisbrunnr Climate
Park in Norway provides a case of the development of such climate consciousness
(Vistad, Wold, Daugstad & Haukeland, 2016), while Picken (2016) examines such issues
in a marine context and Powell, Ramshaw, Ogletree and Krafte in the Antarctic tourism
experience. Fernandes (2016) examines the direct impact of increased high-magnitude
weather events on the built heritage of Madiera Island and its associated effects on
tourism while the final paper of the special issue by Hall and Ram (2016) looks at the
place of heritage in the IPCC reports since the early 1990s to the present day.
This brief introduction has highlighted some of the most significant dimensions of
climate change at a global level. It has also emphasised that tourism is both affected by
and contributes to climate change and that heritage tourism is not only affected by such
change but, given its role within tourism, also contributes to climate change especially
given the contribution of transport to emissions in getting to and from heritage sites.
Nevertheless, the papers in this special issue suggest that not only is it possible to
develop strategies to help protect heritage from climate change but that heritage
tourism may be a significant means to further develop climate change awareness. The
major challenge will come in converting that awareness to action on climate change and
the willingness to contribute further to the costs of heritage conservation and protecting
the resources that tourists come to see.
Acknowledgements
The contribution of the anonymous referees to the success of this special issue is
gratefully acknowledged.
References
Brimblecombe, P. (2014). Refining climate change threats to heritage. Journal of the
Institute of Conservation, 37(2), 85-93.
Brimblecombe, P., Grossi, C., & Harris, I. (2011). Climate change critical to cultural
heritage. In H. Gökçekus, U. Türker & J. LaMoreaux (Eds.), Survival and sustainability:
Environmental concerns in the 21st Century (pp. 195-205). Berlin: Springer.
Cassar, M. (2005). Climate change and the historic environment. London: University
College London with the English Heritage and United Kingdom Climate Impacts
Programme.
Coles, T., Dinan, C. & Warren, N. (2016). Carbon villains? Climate change responses
among accommodation providers in historic premises. Journal of Heritage Tourism, in
press.
Eijgelaar, E., Thaper, C., & Peeters, P. (2010) Antarctic cruise tourism: the paradoxes of
ambassadorship, "last chance tourism" and greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of
Sustainable Tourism, 18, 337-354.
Failte Ireland. (2006). Cultural tourism. Making it work for you. A new strategy for
cultural tourism. Dublin: Failte Ireland.
Fernandes, F. (2016). Built heritage and flash-floods: A case-study of hiking trails and
tourism in Madeira Island. Journal of Heritage Tourism, in press.
Frost, W., & Hall, C.M. (Ed.) (2009). Tourism and national parks: International
perspectives on development, histories and change. London: Routledge.
Gössling, S. (2010) Carbon management in tourism: Mitigating the impacts on climate
change. London: Routledge.
Page 5 of 12
For Peer Review
Gössling, S. (2013). National emissions from tourism: An overlooked policy challenge?.
Energy Policy, 59: 433–442.
Gössling, S., & Hall, C.M. (2006a). An introduction to tourism and global environmental
change. In S. Gössling & C.M. Hall (eds.), Tourism and Global Environmental Change:
Ecological, Economic, Social and Political Interrelationships, London: Routledge.
Gössling, S., & Hall, C.M. (2006b). Uncertainties in predicting tourist travel flows based
on models. Climatic Change, 79(3/4), 163-173.
Gössling, S. & Hall, C.M. (2013) Sustainable culinary systems: An introduction. In C.M.
Hall & S. Gössling (eds.), Sustainable Culinary Systems: Local Foods, Innovation, and
Tourism & Hospitality (pp.3-44), Abingdon: Routledge.
Gössling, S., Hall, C.M. & Scott, D. (2009) The challenges of tourism as a development
strategy in an era of global climate change. In E. Palosou (ed.), Rethinking Development in
a Carbon-Constrained World. Development Cooperation and Climate Change (pp. 100-
109). Helsinki: Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Gössling, S., Peeters, P., & Scott, D. (2008) Consequences of climate policy for
international tourist arrivals in developing countries. Third World Quarterly, 29, 873-
901.
Gössling, S., Hall, C.M., Peeters, P., & Scott, D. (2010). The future of tourism: a climate
change mitigation perspective. Tourism Recreation Research, 35(2), 119–130.
Gössling, S., Scott, D., Hall, C.M., Ceron, J-P. & Dubois, G. (2012). Consumer behaviour and
demand response of tourists to climate change. Annals of Tourism Research, 39, 36-58.
Gössling, S., Scott, D., & Hall, C. M. (2013). Challenges of tourism in a low-carbon
economy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(6), 525-538.
Haanpää, S., Juhola, S. & Landauer, M. (2014). Adapting to climate change: perceptions of
vulnerability of down-hill ski area operators in Southern and Middle Finland. Current
Issues in Tourism, online first. DOI:10.1080/13683500.2014.892917
Hall, C.M. (2007). Pro-poor tourism: Do “tourism exchanges benefit primarily the
countries of the South”? Current Issues in Tourism, 10(2-3), 111-8.
Hall, C.M. (2008). Tourism and climate change: knowledge gaps and issues. Tourism
Recreation Research, 33, 339–350.
Hall, C.M. (2010a). Tourism and biodiversity: More significant than climate change?
Journal of Heritage Tourism, 5, 253-266.
Hall, C.M. (2010b). Crisis events in tourism: Subjects of crisis in tourism. Current Issues in
Tourism, 13, 401–417.
Hall, C.M. (2010c). Changing paradigms and global change: from sustainable to steady-
state tourism. Tourism Recreation Research, 35(2), 131–145.
Hall, C.M. (2013). Framing behavioural approaches to understanding and governing
sustainable tourism consumption: Beyond neoliberalism, ‘nudging’ and ‘green growth’?
Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21: 1091-1109.
Hall, C.M. (2015). On the mobility of tourism mobilities. Current Issues in Tourism, 18(1),
7-10.
Hall, C.M., Amelung, B., Cohen, S., Eijgelaar, E., Gössling, S., Higham, J., Leemans, R.,
Peeters, P., Ram, Y., & Scott, D. (2015). On climate change skepticism and denial in
tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(1), 4-25.
Hall, C.M., & Ram, Y. (2016). Heritage in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC) assessment reports: A lexical assessment. Journal of Heritage Tourism, in press.
Hall, C.M., Scott, D., & Gössling, S. (2011). Forests, climate change and tourism. Journal of
Heritage Tourism, 6(4), 353-363.
Hall, C.M., Scott, D., & Gössling, S. (2013). The primacy of climate change for sustainable
international tourism. Sustainable Development, 21(2), 112-121.
Page 6 of 12
For Peer Review
Howard, A. J. (2013). Managing global heritage in the face of future climate change: The
importance of understanding geological and geomorphological processes and hazards.
International Journal of Heritage Studies, 19(7), 632-658.
IEA (International Energy Agency), (2009). Transport, energy and CO2: moving towards
sustainability. Paris: International Energy Agency.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007a). Communication of
uncertainty in the Working Group II Fourth Assessment. In M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P.
Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden & C.E. Hanson (eds), Climate Change 2007: Impacts,
Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (p. 4). Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
IPCC (2007b). Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report 2007: The
Physical Science Basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC (2013a). Summary for policymakers. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science
Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M.
Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex & P.M. Midgley (eds.)].
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC (2013b). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working
Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
[Stocker, T.F., D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V.
Bex & P.M. Midgley (eds.)]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaján, E., & Saarinen, J. (2013). Tourism, climate change and adaptation: A review.
Current Issues in Tourism, 16(2), 167-195.
Lee, D.S., Fahey, D.W., Forster, P.M., Newton, P.J., Wit, R.C., Lim, L.L., Owen, B., & Sausen,
R. (2009). Aviation and global climate change in the 21st century. Atmospheric
Environment, 43(22), 3520-3537.
Maus, S. (2014). Hand in hand against climate change: cultural human rights and the
protection of cultural heritage. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 27, 699-716.
McIntyre-Tamwoy, S. (2008). The impact of global climate change and cultural heritage:
grasping the issues and defining the problem. Historic Environment, 21(1), 2-9.
Moore, W. R. (2010). The impact of climate change on Caribbean tourism demand.
Current Issues in Tourism, 13(5), 495-505.
Parry, M.L., Canziani, O.F., Palutikof, J.P., van der Linden, P.J. & Hanson, C.E. (eds) (2007).
Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working
Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peeters, P., & Bongaerts, R. (2015). The role of aviation in sustainable development of
tourism. In C. M. Hall, S. Gössling & D. Scott (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of tourism
and sustainability (pp. 420-429). Abingdon: Routledge.
Peeters, P., & Landré, M. (2011). The emerging global tourism geography—an
environmental sustainability perspective. Sustainability, 4(1), 42-71.
Pentelow, L., & Scott, D. (2011). Aviation’s inclusion in international climate policy
regimes: implications for the Caribbean tourism industry. Journal of Air Transport
Management, 17, 199–205.
Perry, J. (2015). Climate change adaptation in the world's best places: A wicked problem
in need of immediate attention. Landscape and Urban Planning, 133, 1-11.
Phillips, H. (2015). The capacity to adapt to climate change at heritage sites—The
development of a conceptual framework. Environmental Science & Policy, 47, 118-125.
Picken, F. (2016). Making heritage of modernity: Provoking Atlantis as a catalyst for
change. Journal of Heritage Tourism, in press.
Page 7 of 12
For Peer Review
Powell, R. B., Ramshaw, G. P., Ogletree, S. & Krafte, K. E. (2016). Can heritage resources
highlight changes to the natural environment caused by climate change? Evidence from
the Antarctic tourism experience. Journal of Heritage Tourism, in press.
Rogelj, J., Hare, W., Lowe, J., van Vuuren, D. P., Riahi, K., Matthews, B., Hanaoka, T., Jiang,
K., & Meinshausen, M. (2011). Emission pathways consistent with 2°C global
temperature limit. Nature Climate Change. 1, 413-418.
Scott, D. (2011). Why sustainable tourism must address climate change. Journal of
Sustainable Tourism, 19, 17-34 .
Scott, D., & Becken, S. (2010). Adapting to climate change and climate policy: progress,
problems and potentials. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18, 283–295.
Scott, D., & Gössling, S. (2015a). Scenarios and forecasts in tourism. In C.M. Hall, S.
Gössling, & D. Scott (Eds). Handbook of tourism and sustainability (pp. 305-319).
Abingdon: Routledge.
Scott, D., & Gössling, S. (2015b). What could the next 40 years hold for global tourism?
Tourism Recreation Research. 40(3), in press.
Scott, D., Hall, C.M. & Gössling, S. (2012). Tourism and Climate Change. Impacts,
Mitigation and Adaptation. London: Routledge.
Scott, D., Hall, C.M., & Gössling, S. (2016). A review of the IPCC 5th Assessment and
implications for tourism sector climate resilience and decarbonization, Journal of
Sustainable Tourism, 24(1), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2015.1062021.
Scott, D., Gössling, S. & Hall, C.M. (2012). International tourism and climate change.
WIRES Climate Change, 3(3): 213-232.
Scott, D., Gössling, S., Hall, C.M. & Peeters, P. (2016). Can tourism be part of the
decarbonized global economy?: The policy costs and risks of carbon reduction
strategies. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, in press.
Scott, D., Peeters, P., & Gössling, S. (2010). Can tourism deliver its aspirational
greenhouse gas emission reduction targets? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18, 393-408.
Scott, D., Steiger, R., Rutty, M., & Johnson, P. (2014). The future of the Olympic Winter
Games in an era of climate change. Current Issues in Tourism, online first.
DOI:10.1080/13683500.2014.887664.
UNFCC. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, New York: UN.
UNWTO. (2004). Tourism market trends. Madrid: UNWTO
United Nations World Tourism Organization, United Nations Environment Programme,
and World Meterological Organization (UNWTO-UNEP-WMO) (2008) Climate change
and tourism: Responding to global challenges. Madrid: UNWTO.
Vistad, O. I., Wold, L. C., Daugstad, K., & Haukeland, J. V. (2016). Mimisbrunnr Climate
Park: A network for heritage learning, tourism development and climate consciousness.
Journal of Heritage Tourism, in press.
World Economic Forum (WEF) (2009) Towards a low carbon travel & tourism sector.
Davos: World Economic Forum.
Zeppel, H. (2012). Climate change and tourism in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park.
Current Issues in Tourism, 15(3), 287-292.
Page 8 of 12
For Peer Review
Table 1: Key findings of the IPCC (2013) with respect to future global and regional
climate change
• Continued emissions of greenhouse gases will cause further warming and
changes in all components of the climate system. Limiting climate change will
require substantial and sustained reductions of greenhouse gas emissions.
• Global surface temperature change for the end of the 21st century is likely1 to
exceed 1.5°C relative to 1850 to 1900 for all Representative Concentration
Pathways (RCP)2 scenarios except RCP2.6. It is likely to exceed 2°C for RCP6.0
and RCP8.5, and more likely than not to exceed 2°C for RCP4.5. Warming will
continue beyond 2100 under all RCP scenarios except RCP2.6. Warming will
continue to exhibit interannual-to-decadal variability and will not be regionally
uniform.
• Changes in the global water cycle in response to the warming over the 21st
century will not be uniform. The contrast in precipitation between wet and dry
regions and between wet and dry seasons will increase, although there may be
regional exceptions.
• The global ocean will continue to warm during the 21st century. Heat will
penetrate from the surface to the deep ocean and affect ocean circulation
• It is very likely that the Arctic sea ice cover will continue to shrink and thin and
that Northern Hemisphere spring snow cover will decrease during the 21st
century as global mean surface temperature rises. Global glacier volume will
further decrease.
• Global mean sea level will continue to rise during the 21st century… Under all
RCP scenarios, the rate of sea level rise will very likely exceed that observed
during 1971 to 2010 due to increased ocean warming and increased loss of mass
from glaciers and ice sheets.
• Climate change will affect carbon cycle processes in a way that will exacerbate
the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere (high confidence). Further uptake of carbon
by the ocean will increase ocean acidification.
• Cumulative emissions of CO2 largely determine global mean surface warming by
the late 21st century and beyond… Most aspects of climate change will persist for
many centuries even if emissions of CO2 are stopped. This represents a
substantial multi-century climate change commitment created by past, present
and future emissions of CO2
1 The IPCC use a level of confidence to characterize uncertainty as to the correctness of an
analysis or a statement:
• high confidence about 8 out of 10 chance;
Likelihood refers to a probabilistic assessment of some well defined outcome
having occurred or occurring in the future:
• very likely >90 % probability;
• likely > 66 % probability;
• about as likely as not 33–66 % probability;
2. A set of scenarios of anthropogenic contributions to the climate system which was used for
climate model simulations carried out for the IPCC under the framework of the World Climate Research Programme.
Source: IPCC, 2007a; 2013a
Page 9 of 12
For Peer Review
Table 2: Tourism Sector Emissions and Mitigation Targets
Year
Emission Estimates and
BAU Projections (CO2)
Mitigation Targets
UNWTO-
UNEP-WMO
(2008)
WEF
(2009)
WTTC
(2009)*
5% allocation of CO2 emissions
from a ‘below +2°C scenario’ to
tourism sector **
2005 1.304 Gt 1.476 Gt -
2020 2.181 Gt 2.319 Gt 0.978 Gt 1.254 Gt
2035 3.059 Gt 3.164 Gt 0.652 Gt 0.940 Gt
* - WTTC (2009) aspirational emission reduction targets are -25% in 2020 and -50% in
2035 (both from 2005 levels specified in UNWTO-UNEP-WMO 2008)
** Pathway that limits global average temperature increase to below 2°C; assuming CO2
continues to representing approximately 57% (IPCC, 2007b) of the median estimate of
44 Gt CO2-e total GHG emissions in 2020 and 2035 (Rogelj, 2011) and the tourism sector
continues to represent approximately 5% of global CO2 emissions (UNWTO-UNEP-WMO,
2008; WEF, 2009) over the same time frame (Gössling, Scott & Hall, 2013).
Page 10 of 12
For Peer Review
Table 1: Key findings of the IPCC (2013) with respect to future global and regional
climate change
• Continued emissions of greenhouse gases will cause further warming and
changes in all components of the climate system. Limiting climate change will
require substantial and sustained reductions of greenhouse gas emissions.
• Global surface temperature change for the end of the 21st century is likely1 to
exceed 1.5°C relative to 1850 to 1900 for all Representative Concentration
Pathways (RCP)2 scenarios except RCP2.6. It is likely to exceed 2°C for RCP6.0
and RCP8.5, and more likely than not to exceed 2°C for RCP4.5. Warming will
continue beyond 2100 under all RCP scenarios except RCP2.6. Warming will
continue to exhibit interannual-to-decadal variability and will not be regionally
uniform.
• Changes in the global water cycle in response to the warming over the 21st
century will not be uniform. The contrast in precipitation between wet and dry
regions and between wet and dry seasons will increase, although there may be
regional exceptions.
• The global ocean will continue to warm during the 21st century. Heat will
penetrate from the surface to the deep ocean and affect ocean circulation
• It is very likely that the Arctic sea ice cover will continue to shrink and thin and
that Northern Hemisphere spring snow cover will decrease during the 21st
century as global mean surface temperature rises. Global glacier volume will
further decrease.
• Global mean sea level will continue to rise during the 21st century… Under all
RCP scenarios, the rate of sea level rise will very likely exceed that observed
during 1971 to 2010 due to increased ocean warming and increased loss of mass
from glaciers and ice sheets.
• Climate change will affect carbon cycle processes in a way that will exacerbate
the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere (high confidence). Further uptake of carbon
by the ocean will increase ocean acidification.
• Cumulative emissions of CO2 largely determine global mean surface warming by
the late 21st century and beyond… Most aspects of climate change will persist for
many centuries even if emissions of CO2 are stopped. This represents a
substantial multi-century climate change commitment created by past, present
and future emissions of CO2
1 The IPCC use a level of confidence to characterize uncertainty as to the correctness of an
analysis or a statement:
• high confidence about 8 out of 10 chance;
Likelihood refers to a probabilistic assessment of some well defined outcome
having occurred or occurring in the future:
• very likely >90 % probability;
• likely > 66 % probability;
• about as likely as not 33–66 % probability;
2. A set of scenarios of anthropogenic contributions to the climate system which was used for
climate model simulations carried out for the IPCC under the framework of the World Climate
Research Programme.
Source: IPCC, 2007a; 2013a
Page 11 of 12
For Peer Review
Table 2: Tourism Sector Emissions and Mitigation Targets
Year
Emission Estimates and
BAU Projections (CO2)
Mitigation Targets
UNWTO-
UNEP-WMO
(2008)
WEF
(2009)
WTTC
(2009)*
5% allocation of CO2 emissions
from a ‘below +2°C scenario’ to
tourism sector **
2005 1.304 Gt 1.476 Gt -
2020 2.181 Gt 2.319 Gt 0.978 Gt 1.254 Gt
2035 3.059 Gt 3.164 Gt 0.652 Gt 0.940 Gt
* - WTTC (2009) aspirational emission reduction targets are -25% in 2020 and -50% in
2035 (both from 2005 levels specified in UNWTO-UNEP-WMO 2008)
** Pathway that limits global average temperature increase to below 2°C; assuming CO2
continues to representing approximately 57% (IPCC, 2007b) of the median estimate of
44 Gt CO2-e total GHG [Gigatons CO2 equivalent] emissions in 2020 and 2035 (Rogelj,
2011) and the tourism sector continues to represent approximately 5% of global CO2
emissions (UNWTO-UNEP-WMO, 2008; WEF, 2009) over the same time frame (Gössling,
Scott & Hall, 2013).
Page 12 of 12