document no.86 risk assessment matrix consequence scale hurst

11
Corrib Onshore Pipeline: Qualitative Risk Assessment 1 Risk Assessment Matrix Consequence Scale: 1 Slight injury 2 Minor injury 3 Major injury 4 1 to 3 fatalities 5 More than 3 fatalities Shell Matrix AS2885 Matrix Trivial Minimal impact Minor Injuries requiring 1 st aid Severe Injury requiring hospital treatment Major Few fatalities Catastrophic Multiple fatalities

Upload: an-ji

Post on 16-Jan-2016

32 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

EDP Audit

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Document No.86 Risk Assessment Matrix Consequence Scale Hurst

Corrib Onshore Pipeline: Qualitative Risk Assessment 1

Risk Assessment Matrix Consequence Scale:

1 Slight injury

2 Minor injury

3 Major injury

4 1 to 3 fatalities

5 More than 3 fatalities

Shell Matrix AS2885 Matrix

Trivial Minimal impact

Minor Injuries requiring 1st

aid

Severe Injury requiring hospital treatment

Major Few fatalities

Catastrophic Multiple fatalities

Page 2: Document No.86 Risk Assessment Matrix Consequence Scale Hurst

Corrib Onshore Pipeline: Qualitative Risk Assessment 2

Risk Assessment Matrix Likelihood Scale:

A Highly unlikely - never heard of in the industry

B Heard of in the industry

CHas happened in UIE* (or more than once per year in the industry)

DHas happened at the location (or more than once per year in UIE*)

EFrequent - has happened more than once per year in the location

Shell Matrix AS2885 Matrix

HypotheticalTheoretically possible but has never occurred on a similar pipeline

Remote Not anticipated for this pipeline at this location

UnlikelyUnlikely to occur within the life of the pipeline, but possible

Occasional May occur occasionally in the life of the pipeline

Frequent Expected to occur once a year or more

*UIE= Upstream International Europe

Page 3: Document No.86 Risk Assessment Matrix Consequence Scale Hurst

Corrib Onshore Pipeline: Qualitative Risk Assessment 3

Overall Risk Assessment MatrixComparison

Catastrophic Major Severe Minor Trivial

Frequent Extreme Extreme High Intermediate Low

Occasional Extreme High Intermediate Low Low

Unlikely High High Intermediate Low Negligible

Remote High Intermediate Low Negligible Negligible

Hypothetical Intermediate Low Negligible Negligible Negligible

AS2885 Matrix

Page 4: Document No.86 Risk Assessment Matrix Consequence Scale Hurst

Corrib Onshore Pipeline: Qualitative Risk Assessment 4

Overall Risk Assessment Matrix ComparisonShell Matrix

5 4 3 2 1

More than 3

fatalities

1 to 3 fatalities

Major injury

Minor injury

Slight injury

E Frequent

D Has happened at location

C Has happened in UIE

B Heard of in industry

A Highly unlikely

Page 5: Document No.86 Risk Assessment Matrix Consequence Scale Hurst

Corrib Onshore Pipeline: Qualitative Risk Assessment 5

5 4 3 2 1

More than 3

fatalities

1 to 3 fatalities

Major injury

Minor injury

Slight injury

E FrequentExtreme Extreme High Intermediate Low

D Has happened at location

Extreme High Intermediate Low Low

C Has happened in UIE

High High Intermediate Low Negligible

B Heard of in industry

High Intermediate Low Negligible Negligible

A Highly unlikelyIntermediate Low Negligible Negligible Negligible

Overall Risk Assessment Matrix ComparisonShell Matrix vs AS2885

Page 6: Document No.86 Risk Assessment Matrix Consequence Scale Hurst

Corrib Onshore Pipeline: Qualitative Risk Assessment 6

Catast-rophic

Major Severe Minor Trivial

FrequentExtreme Extreme High Intermediate Low

OccasionalExtreme High Intermediate Low Low

UnlikelyHigh High Intermediate Low Negligible

RemoteHigh Intermediate Low Negligible Negligible

HypotheticalIntermediate Low Negligible Negligible Negligible

Overall Risk Assessment Matrix Comparison

AS2885

Page 7: Document No.86 Risk Assessment Matrix Consequence Scale Hurst

Corrib Onshore Pipeline: Qualitative Risk Assessment 7

Potential RiskShell Matrix

5 4 3 2 1

More than 3

fatalities

1 to 3 fatalities

Major injury

Minor injury

Slight injury

E Frequent 1D Has happened at

location 2 2 1 1C Has happened in

UIE 3 9 7 4B Heard of in

industry 1 5 6 1A Highly unlikely 1 1

Page 8: Document No.86 Risk Assessment Matrix Consequence Scale Hurst

Corrib Onshore Pipeline: Qualitative Risk Assessment 8

Catast-rophic

Major Severe Minor Trivial

Frequent 1Occasional 2 2 1 1Unlikely 3 9 7 4Remote 1 5 6 1Hypothetical 1 1

Potential Risk

AS2885

Page 9: Document No.86 Risk Assessment Matrix Consequence Scale Hurst

Corrib Onshore Pipeline: Qualitative Risk Assessment 9

Risk Treatment ActionsShell Matrix

5 4 3 2 1

More than 3 fatalities

1 to 3 fatalities

Major injury Minor injury Slight injury

E Frequent 1D Has happened at

location 2 2 1 1C Has happened in UIE 3 9 7 4B Heard of in industry 1 5 6 1A Highly unlikely 1 1

Indentify & implement controls to reduce risk to ALARP and

provide a documented demonstration of ALARP

Identify & implement controls to reduce risk to As Low As Reasonably Practicable

(ALARP)

Manage for continuous improvement through effective implementation of the Safety Management System (SMS)

Page 10: Document No.86 Risk Assessment Matrix Consequence Scale Hurst

Corrib Onshore Pipeline: Qualitative Risk Assessment 10

Catast-rophic Major Severe Minor Trivial

Frequent 1

Occasional 2 2 1 1

Unlikely 3 9 7 4Remote 1 5 6 1Hypothetical 1 1

Risk Treatment Actions

AS2885Reduce risk to intermediate or

lower

Determine management plan for prevention and monitoring for

changes (i.e. SMS)

If possible:• Quantify risk• Reduce risk to low or

negligible; otherwise • Demonstrate ALARP.

Review at next review interval

Page 11: Document No.86 Risk Assessment Matrix Consequence Scale Hurst

Corrib Onshore Pipeline: Qualitative Risk Assessment 11

Risk Treatment Comparison

• Reduce risks to ALARP = 31

• Manage via SMS = 14

• Reduce risks to intermediate or lower = 15

• Reduce to low or demonstrate ALARP = 15

• Determine SMS = 13• Review next time = 2

AS2885Shell