django-herrajes.s3.amazonaws.com · plastic strain was 1.6 and 1.9 mm, respectively and did not...

9

Upload: others

Post on 22-May-2020

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: django-herrajes.s3.amazonaws.com · Plastic strain was 1.6 and 1.9 mm, respectively and did not exceed the limit values. The test did not show any damage to components, the handles
Page 2: django-herrajes.s3.amazonaws.com · Plastic strain was 1.6 and 1.9 mm, respectively and did not exceed the limit values. The test did not show any damage to components, the handles
Page 3: django-herrajes.s3.amazonaws.com · Plastic strain was 1.6 and 1.9 mm, respectively and did not exceed the limit values. The test did not show any damage to components, the handles
Page 4: django-herrajes.s3.amazonaws.com · Plastic strain was 1.6 and 1.9 mm, respectively and did not exceed the limit values. The test did not show any damage to components, the handles
Page 5: django-herrajes.s3.amazonaws.com · Plastic strain was 1.6 and 1.9 mm, respectively and did not exceed the limit values. The test did not show any damage to components, the handles
Page 6: django-herrajes.s3.amazonaws.com · Plastic strain was 1.6 and 1.9 mm, respectively and did not exceed the limit values. The test did not show any damage to components, the handles
Page 7: django-herrajes.s3.amazonaws.com · Plastic strain was 1.6 and 1.9 mm, respectively and did not exceed the limit values. The test did not show any damage to components, the handles
Page 8: django-herrajes.s3.amazonaws.com · Plastic strain was 1.6 and 1.9 mm, respectively and did not exceed the limit values. The test did not show any damage to components, the handles
Page 9: django-herrajes.s3.amazonaws.com · Plastic strain was 1.6 and 1.9 mm, respectively and did not exceed the limit values. The test did not show any damage to components, the handles