disposal of condensed milk by digestion
TRANSCRIPT
Disposal of Condensed Milk by DigestionAuthor(s): David P. BackmeyerSource: Sewage Works Journal, Vol. 21, No. 6 (Nov., 1949), pp. 1076-1077Published by: Water Environment FederationStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25031183 .
Accessed: 18/06/2014 13:59
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
Water Environment Federation is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to SewageWorks Journal.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 185.44.77.146 on Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:59:03 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
1076 SEWAGE WORKS JOURNAL November, 1949
8. Kozma, Albert B., "Sludge Digestion?
Operation and Control." This Jour
nal, 16, 4, 700 (July, 1944). 9. Babbitt, Harold E., "Garbage Disposal
as a Sewage Problem." This Jour
nal, 16, 5, 861 (Sept., 1944). 10. McDonald, John D., "Sludge Disposal
Experiences at Springfield, Mass."
This Journal, 16, 5, 872 (Sept., 1944). 11. Daniels, P. N., "The Care and Operation
of Imhoff Tanks." This Journal,
17, 5, 995 (Sept., 1945). 12. Langford, L. L., "Theory and Operation
of Separate Sludge Digestion Units."
This Journal, 17, 6, 1235 (Nov.,
1945). 13. Schlenz, Harry E. and Buswell, A. M.,
"Important Considerations in Sludge
Digestion." This Journal, 19, 1, 19
(Jan., 1947). 14. Rankin, R. S., "Scum Control in Diges
ters." This Journal, 19, 3, 405
(May, 1947). 15. Rudolfs, W., et al., "A Critical Review
of the Literature of 1947 on Sewage and Waste Treatment and Stream Pol
lution." This Journal, 20, 2, 242
(Mar., 1948).
16. Rankin, R. S., "Digester Capacity Re
quirements. ' '
This Journal, 20, 3, 478
(May, 1948). 17. Walker, J. Donald,
' ' Sludge Digestion and
Methane Production." This Journal,
20, 3, 544 (May, 1948). 18. Kunsch, Walter M., "Sludge Digestion
Experiences with the External Heat
Exchanger." This Journal, 20, 6, 999 (Nov., 1948).
19. "Central States Sewage Works Associa
tion 1948 Operators' Breakfast For
um." This Journal, 20, 6, 1092
(Nov., 1948).
20. Rudolfs, W., et al., "A Critical Review
of the Literature of 1948 on Sewage and Waste Treatment and Stream Pol lution." This Journal, 21, 2, 240
(Mar., 1949).
21. Rudolfs, W., "Principles - of Sewage
Treatment." Bulletin No. 212, Na
tional Lime Association.
22. Doman, Joseph, "The Scum Problem
from the Operators' Standpoint." Water and Sewage Works, 94, 7, R211
(July, 1947).
DISPOSAL OF CONDENSED MILK BY DIGESTION By David P. Backmeyer
Superintendent, Water and Sewage Treatment Utilities, Marion, Ind.
An excellent example of how cooper ation between the municipal sewage treatment plant and industry can help to sidestep trouble for the operator is contained in the recent handling of a
heavy "slug" of otherwise troublesome
produce waste by the Marion, Ind., sewage treatment plant. The circum stances causing the incident were somewhat unusual, and called for an unusual although simple solution.
On August 5, 1949, a local produce plant was involved in a labor dispute and the workers went on strike. On hand was 11,000 gal. of condensed
milk, which the strikers would not allow out of the plant. The milk could not be held indefinitely, and if dumped into the sewers it would seriously upset the activated sludge treatment plant. Obviously, some means of disposal was needed.
With a total dry solids content of 24.5 per cent and a volatile solids con tent of 94.4 per cent, the total volatile solids involved in the 11,000 gal. of
TABLE I.?Gas Production Resulting from Addition of Condensed Milk to
Marion, Ind., Digesters
Date (1949)
Con densed Milk
Added (gal.)
Gas Produced (cu. ft.)
Total Normal From Milk Load
CO? Content
(%)
Aug. 3 4 5 6 73 8 9
10 11
11,0001
74,900 74,621 74,234
126,875 141,6304 87,000 87,000 84,000 76,000
74,900 74,621 74,234 69,500* 59,500? 68,000* 69,500? 71,500* 74,000*
57,375 82,130 19,000 17,500 12,500 2,000
35.6 36.0 36.6 36.2
34.4 34.6 33.8 34.2
1 Approx. 20,000 lb. volatile solids.
2 Estimated from past experience. s
Sunday. 4 Partly estimated by measuring cover drop
on release from dome.
This content downloaded from 185.44.77.146 on Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:59:03 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Vol. 21, No. 6 EXTRACTS FROM OPERATION REPORTS 1077
condensed milk amounted to about
20,000 lb. This was not considered to be too heavy an extra loading for the
plant digesters, as almost all of it would be quickly removed in the form of gas or supernatant.
Consequently, the entire volume of condensed milk was hauled to the treatment plant in the tank trucks
normally used for hauling liquid sludge. At the plant it was dumped into the ground-garbage well for pump
ing to the digesters. Hauling and
loading to the digesters was started on
August 5 and completed on August 6.
Digester temperature was 99? F.
throughout the entire operation. The resulting gas production was
rapid and spectacular. On August 6
it was nearly double the normal daily volume, and on August 7 was so great that the plant gas meters were inade
quate to handle it. Part of the volume
(Table I) was estimated by measuring the drop of the floating cover as the
gas was released directly from the cover dome. The previous gas produc
tion record for the plant (110,000 cu.
ft. per day) was set during the summer
of 1948, when cheese whey was being handled by the same method (see This
Journal, 20, 6, 1115; Nov., 1948). No increase in C02^ content of the
gas was apparent. In fact, no notice
able ill effects of any kind have re
sulted from the unusually heavy shock
load, the digestion system seeming to have taken the material in stride.
INTERESTING EXTRACTS FROM OPERATION REPORTS
? ' When your work speaks for itself, don yt interrupt.
'9
Attention operators! It will be appreciated if copies of all annual reports of both large and small plants are sent to the Federation ofi?ce for abstracting in this section of the
Journal. Carbon copies of typewritten reports will be promptly returned on request.
Please direct annual reports to: Federation of Sewage Works Associations, Room 325,
Illinois Bldg., Champaign, 111.
Seventeenth Annual Report of the Division of Sewage Disposal, Toledo, Ohio, for 1948 *
By A. H. Niles, Engineer-Superintendent
The sharp increase in sewage flow
experienced during the first half of
1947 continued throughout 1948, indi
cating that the flow represents firm
growth, both industrial and domestic.
Gas Engines
The gas engine driven pump, fueled
with digester gas averaged 31.8 m.g.d., or 363 gal. per cu. ft. of gas for the
year. This is the greatest amount
pumped and at the greatest efficiency
* For last previous extract see This Jour
nal, 20, 6, 1114 (Nov., 1948).
in the 12 complete years of operation of the engine. This speaks well for the quality of maintenance not only of the gas engine but also of the 36
m.g.d. rated capacity pump, which is over 26 years old. The 2 gas engines installed late in 1936 at an original cost of $41,075 have now saved a total of $170,909.51 in the cost of electric current used at Bay View Park.
Tol-E-Gro
The tonnage available for the spring of 1948 was the lowest in several years, due to the painting of the superstruc
This content downloaded from 185.44.77.146 on Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:59:03 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions