discourse in “ways of knowing” and “engagement” · discourse in “ways of knowing” and...
TRANSCRIPT
The Henderson Repository is a free resource of the HonorSociety of Nursing, Sigma Theta Tau International. It isdedicated to the dissemination of nursing research, research-related, and evidence-based nursing materials. Take credit for allyour work, not just books and journal articles. To learn more,visit www.nursingrepository.org
Item type Presentation
Format Text-based Document
Title Discourse in Ways of Knowing and Engagement:Advancing Nursing Knowledge in Online Environments
Authors Bankert, Esther G.; Dusaj, Tresa Kaur; Madison, HollyEvans; Cannistraci, Patricia
Downloaded 2-Jul-2018 11:06:13
Link to item http://hdl.handle.net/10755/603856
Discourse in “Ways of Knowing” and “Engagement”
Advancing Nursing Knowledge in Online Environments
Esther Bankert, PhD, RNTresa Kaur Dusaj PhD, RN-BC, CNE, CHSE, CTN-A
Faculty Program Directors Excelsior College (Albany, New York)
4/8/2016
Acknowledgments
STTI Iota Delta Chapter and Faculty Development, SUNY Poly
Center for Excellence in Teaching, Learning and Assessment (CETLA) awarded the Faculty Program Director Scholarship Grant, Excelsior College
Excelsior College School of Nursing Albany, NY
ObjectivesA. Propose a guided, asynchronous discussion for BS and MS students in nursing that: Supports adult learning theory Encourages reflective practice Fosters a learning community.
B. Present a Rubric and Preliminary Outcomes that evaluates discussions through “Ways of Knowing” and “Engagement”.
Background of the Problem
Unrealistic Timeframe Expectations • Initial post by midweek rushed and increases
frustration• Work / family commitment lead to post “late” • Focus of discussion: meeting number of required
responses then disengaged in discussions• Loss of spontaneity with time-driven requirements
Reference Requirement • Pasting in references to meet required sources• Feedback focused on APA format
Question the Purpose: Online Discussion
Forum: Engage learners and
faculty in collegial conversations on academic topics
Reflect on current and past practices
Uncover new insights and understandings
Create a spirit of inquiry and discovery
Community of Learners: Social presence of
engagement and support Value life experiences Opportunity to collaborate Reflective of practices
and openly share knowledge
Respectful discourse to agree and disagree
Trust and acceptance
TheoreticalAssumptions and Principles
Adult Learner
Self directedness & own pace
Draws on experiences Applies new learning Internal motivation Learning schedule
adapts to time constraints
Respectful climate
Reflective Practitioner
Time to develop thoughtful contributions
Passive to active learning Revisit experiences and
examines decisions Enhance self-awareness
of actions Synergistic exchange of
ideas from multiple perspectives
Tenets for Discourse:Our Ah-Ha Moment
Personal Knowing
Personal Knowledge and Understanding of the Nursing Encounter
Ethical Knowing
Moral Reasoning and Question Traditions; Uphold Values and Responsibilities
Empirical Knowing
Theoretical and Empirical Literature
Aesthetic Knowing
Reflective & Discover New Meaning and Insights; Integrate Nursing Knowledge to One’s Own Practice
Engagement
Not restricted by Due Dates-No mid week requirements for initial posting-No restriction for 2 responses
Criteria
Critical Analysis (Ways of Knowing) (50%)
Engagement – 40%
Organization, Writing Style, Grammar, Usage, Mechanics, and Netiquette (10%)
Aesthetic Knowing
Personal Knowing
Ethical Knowing
Empiric Knowing
Exemplary Mastery Developing Beginning Incomplete
50-48 47-43 42-38 37-33 32-0
Preliminary OutcomesAdvantages Learning Moments
Rubric provides prompts to stimulate thoughts and responses to question.
Training period for both faculty and students. (1-2 semesters)
More profound discussions guided by the ways of knowing, promoting the spirit of inquiry.
Some student resistance where many students who earned higher grades were not used to the new method.
Students less focused on quotes and citations and more of a student voice.
Faculty learning curve related to using ways of knowing and inclusion of scholarly references.
Feedback is more objective. Students use headings from 4 ways of knowing to guide responses.
Students and faculty learning curve related to participation,revised posting deadlines and engagement.
ReferencesAnderson-Meger, J. (2014). Examining knowledge beliefs to motivate student learning.
Faculty Focus, (July 21, 2014). Retrieved from http://www.facultyfocus.com/ Carper, B. A. (1978). Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. ANS
Advances in nursing Science, 1(1), 13-23. Chickering, A. W. & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in
undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7): 3-7.Chinn, P. L. & Kramer, M. K. (2015). Knowledge development in nursing: Theory and
process (9thed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier. Heath, H. (1998). Reflection and patterns of knowing in nursing. Journal of Advanced
Nursing, 27, 1054-1059.Johns, C. (1995). Framing learning through reflection within Carper’s fundamental ways
of knowing in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22(2), 226-234.Knowles, M. S. (1968). Andragogy, not pedagogy! Adult Leadership, 16, 35-352, 386.Watson, J. & Smith, M. (2002). Caring science and the science of unitary human beings:
A trans-theoretical discourse for nursing knowledge development. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37(5), 452-461.
Zander, P. E. (2007). Ways of knowing in nursing: The historical evolution of a concept. The Journal of Theory Construction & Theory, 11(1), 7-11.