direct retainers in removable partial dentures

103

Upload: shebin-abraham

Post on 02-Jul-2015

1.915 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


12 download

DESCRIPTION

direct retainers in removable partial dentures

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures
Page 2: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

DIRECT RETAINERS

By

Dr Shebin Abraham

Dept. of Prosthodontics

Page 3: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Contents

Introduction

Definitions.

Classification.

Basic part of clasp assembly.

Analysis of tooth contour.

Basic Principles of clasp design.

Cast circumferential clasp.

Bar clasp.

Other types of clasp.

Intracoronal retainers.

Conclusion.

Page 4: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Introduction

Page 5: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Types of retention

Primary retention.

1. By clasps

Secondary retention.

2. Acting through

polished surface of the

denture.

3. Tissue coverage.

Page 6: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Definition:-

Direct retainer:-

“That component of a partial removable dentalprosthesis used to retain and prevent dislodgment,consisting of a clasp assembly or precisionattachment” GPT-8

Direct retention :

“Retention obtained in a partial removable dental prosthesis by the use of clasps or attachments that resist removal from the abutment teeth” –GPT-8

Page 7: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Classification Of Direct Retainers.

Intra coronal Extra coronal

Precision attachment

Semi precision

attachment

Retentive clasp

assemblies

Attachments

Supra bulge clasp

Infra bulge clasp

Clinical removable prosthodontics:- STEWART’S 3rd edition

Page 8: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Intracoronal

Proposed by Dr Herman E S Chayes in 1906.

Cast or attached within the contours of natural teeth(abutment).

Keyway and key…..Opposing vertical walls provides retention.

Retention is achieved by frictional resistance.

1. Precision attachment manufactured by high precision technique andinstruments

2. Semi precision attachment less intimate contact between matrix andmatrix component. Unlike precision attachment they consist oftapering walls and are casted from wax or plastic pattern.

Page 9: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Extracoronal attachment.

First proposed by Henry H Boos 1900 later modified byEwing F Roach in 1908.

Located outside the teeth.

Retention frommechanical resistance.

Permit vertical movement during vertical loading.

Minimize potentially damaging forces to abutment Stressbreaking or stress directing effects.

Page 10: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Occlusally approaching / Suprabulge / Ney Type I clasp / Circumferential:

• Approaches the tooth

undercut from an occlusal

direction

• It is attached to metal

framework above the

height of contour.

Gingivally approaching / Infrabulge/ Bar/ Roach / Ney

Type II Clasp:

• The retentive arm originates

from the metal base or

denture framework

traverses soft tissue and

• Approaches the tooth

undercut area from a

gingival direction.

EXTRACORONAL DIRECT RETAINERS

Page 11: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

The basic parts of a clasp assembly include the following:

Page 12: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

It is the part of the clasp that lies on the occlusal, lingual or incisal surface

of a tooth and resist (tissue ward) movement of the clasp by ensuring

that the retentive terminals of the clasp remain fixed in the desired or

planned depth of undercut.

RES

T

Page 13: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Body of the clasp

It is the part of the clasp that connects the rest and shoulder of the clasp

to the minor connector.

It must be rigid.

Above the height of contour.

Page 14: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Shoulder

It is the part of the clasp that connects the body to the clasp

terminals.

The shoulder must lie above the height of contour and provide

some stabilization against horizontal displacement of the

prosthesis.

Page 15: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Reciprocal arm

A rigid clasp arm placed above the height of contour on the

side of the tooth, opposing the retentive clasp arm.

Page 16: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Retentive arm

It is the part of the clasp comprising the shoulder which is not flexible and is located

above the height of the contour

It is the terminal end of the retentive clasp arm. It is the only component of the

removable partial denture that lies on the tooth surface cervical to the height of the

contour. It possesses a certain degree of flexibility and offers the property of direct

retention.

Page 17: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Approach arm

It is a component of the bar clasp.

It is a minor connector that projects from the

framework, runs along the mucosa and turns to cross

the gingival margin of the abutment tooth; to

approach the undercut from a gingival direction.

Page 18: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Analysis of tooth contour:-

Before moving on to principles of clasp design its vitallyimportant to consider how tooth contour & RPD componentsmust be related to allow a stable prosthetic function.

What is path of insertion??? path of removal ??and height ofcontour???

Point of maximum convexity or the term height of contour Dr Edward Kennedy in 1985.

This critical area of an abutment that provide for retention &stabilization can only be identified with the use of dental castsurveyor.

Page 19: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Prothero’s concept

Proposed “cone theory” of clinicalcrown in 1916.

Provided conceptual basis of mechanicalretention.

Contours of clinical crown resembles twocones sharing a common base.

The line formed at the junction of thisbase represents the greatest diameter ofthe tooth.

This greatest diameter is called height ofcontour or point of maximum convexity.

Page 20: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Devan [1955] referred to thesurface occlusal to the height ofcontour as suprabulge, & thesurface inclining cervically asinfrabulge.

suprabulge

infrabulge

Page 21: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Angle of convergence

Page 22: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

o When the surveyor blade contacts a tooth on the cast at itsgreatest convexity, a triangle is formed.

o The apex of this triangle is at the point of contact of surveyorblade with the tooth and base is towards the gingival tissues.

o This apical angle is called angle of cervical convergence. Theimportance of this angle lies in its relationship to the amountof retention.

Page 23: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Basic Principles of clasp design

Page 24: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

According to Stewart basic principles are:-

1. Retention.

2. Stability.

3. Support.

4. Reciprocation.

5. Encirclement.

6. Passivity.

Page 25: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Retention

“Retention is the inherent quality of the claspassembly that resists forces acting to dislodgecomponents away from the tooth structure.”

No single component of a clasp assembly is solely responsiblefor prosthesis retention.

Rather, it is effective design and accurate construction thatmake the removable partial denture retentive.

Page 26: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

The amount of retention designed into a removable partialdenture should always be the minimum necessary to resistreasonable dislodging forces.

A rigid clasp flexing over the height of contour may transferharmful stresses to an abutment during insertion, removal, andfunctional movement of the prosthesis.

An only a minimum area of contact should be seen.

Page 27: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Amount of retention

Factors that effect retention can be divided into -

1. Tooth factors

Size of angle of cervical convergence

How far clasp is placed in angle of cervical convergence.

2. Prosthesis factors

Clasp length

Clasp diameter

Clasp cross-sectional form[ shape]

Material used for making clasp[ alloy]

Page 28: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Prosthesis factors:-

Length of clasp arm-

Longer the clasp arm the more flexible it will be.

Circumferential clasps more retentive than bar clasp for a given clasp length.

The clasp arm should taper from the point of origin to provide its flexibility.

Page 29: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures
Page 30: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Diameter of the clasp:

The greater the diameter of a clasp arm the less flexible itwill be.(only in uniform taper)

If its taper is absolutely uniform ,the avg diameter will be ata point midway between its origin & its terminal end.

But if taper is not uniform a point of flexure –therefore apoint of weakness will exist.

Page 31: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Cross-sectional form: Flexibility may exist in any form, but is limited to only one direction in the case

of the half-round form

The only universally flexible form is the round form.

Clasp arm should only flex away from tooth so half round is used.

Round shaped clasp arm used only in distal extension denture bases so that itcan flex in all directions during functional movement and minimize stresses.

Page 32: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Material used for construction:

Gold alloy greater flexibility than chrome alloys ,

Disadvantage of cast gold alloys bulk of the prosthesiscostly.

Chrome alloys have a higher modulus of elasticity & thereforeless flexibility.

So in less undercut areas CoCr alloy can be used but in casesof deep undercut wrought metal can be used.

Page 33: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Relative uniformity of

retention:

1. Retention on all principal abutments should be as equal aspossible.

2. Retentive clasp arms should be located so that they lie in thesame approx.. Degree of undercut on each abutment tooth.

3. Retentive clasp positioning should also be same on thecontralateral side of arch.(atleast for one teeth).

Page 34: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Support

“Support is the quality of a clasp assembly that resistsdisplacement of a prosthesis in an apical direction.”

Provided by occlusal rest.

1. A properly prepared rest seat and corresponding rest serve to resistdisplacement of the prosthesis toward the supporting teeth and softtissues, thereby ensuring that the clasp assembly maintains its intendedrelation to the abutment, and

2. Transmit functional forces parallel to the long axes of the abutments.

Page 35: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Stabilization.

“Stability is the quality of a clasp assembly that resistsdisplacement of a prosthesis in a horizontal direction.”

It helps the denture be steady constant firm and resistdisplacement due to function stresses and also preventchange in position of the denture.

It is provided by :-

1. Reciprocal element.

2. The shoulder(s) of a cast circumferential retentive clasp.

3. Vertically oriented minor connectors.

Page 36: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Reciprocation

“Reciprocation is the quality of a clasp assembly that counteracts lateral displacement of an abutment when the retentive clasp terminus passes over the height of contour.”

As the retentive arm passes over the height of contour it flexes creating lateral forces damage to the tooth.

The reciprocal element may be a

1. Retentive arm of clasp

2. Lingual plating,

3. Combination of mesial and distal minor connectors.

Page 37: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Points to be remembered while

providing reciprocation

1. To optimize reciprocation, the axial surface of an abutmentshould be prepared parallel to the path of insertion and removal.

2. It should be placed above the height of contour.

3. To provide true reciprocation, the reciprocal clasp arm must bein contact during the entire period of retentive claspdeformation.

Page 38: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Encirclement.

“Encirclement is the characteristic of a clasp assembly that prevents

movement of an abutment away from the associated clasp assembly”.

Clasp assembly 180 degrees contact.

Page 39: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

The engagement can be in the form of continuous contact, such

as circumferential clasp, or discontinuous contact, such as Bar

clasp.

Both provide tooth contact in at least 3 areas encircling the

tooth-

Page 40: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Passivity.

“Passivity is the quality of a clasp assembly thatprevents the transmission of adverse forces to theassociated abutment when the prosthesis iscompletely seated.”

When fully seated it should be passive.

Should be activated only when dislodging forces are applied.

Page 41: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Other principles

1. Retentive clasp element should always be placed on facial surface of tooth.(mainly in premolars)

2. Only one retentive element should be used per tooth opposed by a reciprocal element.

3. Clasp retainers on the abutment adjacent to distal extension bases should be designed so they will avoid direct transmission of tipping & rotational forces to the abutment.

4. The path of escapement for each retentive clasp terminal must be other than parallel to the path of removal for the prosthesis to require clasp engagement with resistance to deformation.

Page 42: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

CRITERIA FOR CLASP SELECTION

Survey line

Requirements of retention and stability depending on the number, configuration of edentulous areas.

Nature of support

Root size and form

Esthetics

Presence of excessive tissue undercut

Oral hygiene and patient awareness

Page 43: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Cast circumferential clasp.

Page 44: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

First proposed by Dr N B Nebbit. Later modified by Dr Polk E Aker.

Simple and easy to construct

Large amount of tooth surface that is covered by the clasp assembly leads to enamel decalcification.

Page 45: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Design rules..

1. The clasp should arise from the main body of the claspassembly above the height of contour. The retentive armshould extend cervically and circumferentially in a gentlyarcing manner.

2. All the components of the C clasp should be present abovethe height of contour except the retentive tip.

3. The retentive terminus should always be directed towardsthe occlusal surface never towards the gingiva.

4. It should always terminate at the mesial or distal line anglenever at midfacial or midlingual surface.

Page 46: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

5. The retentive arm should be positioned as far apically on theabutment as is practical.(not impinging the gingiva)

6. Special considerations in case of distal extension case:-

A cast circumferential clasp should not be used to engage (a) themesiofacial surface of an abutment adjacent to a posterior edentulousspace or

the distofacial surface of an abutment adjacent to an extensive anterioredentulous space.

Page 47: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Simple circlet clasp.

It is one of the most commonly used clasps retentive and stabilizing ability.

The basic design consist of

1. buccal retentive arm and

2. a lingual reciprocal arm originating from a common body.

3. Occlusal rest.

With retentive arm projecting away from the edentulous space.

Page 48: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Advantages:-

1. Fulfils the design requirements of support, stability, reciprocation, encirclement, and passivity.

2. Its uncomplicated design features make it easy to construct and relatively simple to repair.

Disadvantages:-

1. If used in distal extension base due to fulcrum rotation of the clasp it can cause damage to teeth.

2. Can increase the circumference of teeth and lead to food accumulation and decalcification.

Page 49: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Reverse circlet clasp

Used when undercut is located at the facial distoangle adjacent to an edentulous space.

Design

It consists of a mesial occlusal rest, a horizontal reciprocal arm, and a retentive arm engaging the distobuccal undercut adjacent to the edentulous area.

Advantages:-

Decreases the harmful stresses to teeth.

Disadvantages:-

Week clasp if sufficient preparation is not done.

Poor aesthetics' if used in premolars and cuspids.

Page 50: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Multiple circlet clasp:

A multiple circlet clasp design involves two simple circletclasps joined at the terminal aspects of their reciprocalelements.

Used in periodontally weekend teeth to splint them

Disadvantages are same as circlet clasp.

Page 51: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Embrasure clasp

Also known as the Bonwill clasp.

fabrication of unmodified Class II or Class III partial denture situation;

when there are no edentulous spaces available on the opposite side of the arch to aid in clasping.

Page 52: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Design:-

Double occlusal rests, two retentive clasp arms and the two reciprocal clasp arms either bilaterally or diagonally opposed.

Prevent interproximal wedging by the prosthesis, which could cause separation of the abutment tooth and result in food impaction and clasp displacement.

In addition to providing support, occlusal rests also serve to shunt food away from the contact area.

Disadvantages:-

Improper clearance can give rise thin section of clasp leading to breakage.

Page 53: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Ring clasp

Circumferential clasp encircles nearlyall of the tooth from its point of origin.

It is usually used when a proximalundercut cannot be approached by anyother means.

In case of tilted molars

A support strut is provided on the nonretentive arm.

Page 54: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Advantages:-

Provides adequate encirclement.

excellent retention with adequate flexibility due to increased length of clasp arm

Disadvantages:-

Decalcification of teeth

Increased occlusal table.

Poor structure of clasp.

Page 55: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Hairpin clasp or reverse action or

fish hook clasp

A simple circlet clasp in which the retentive arm loops back to engage an undercut apical to the point of origin.

Used when a distofacial undercut is present adjacent to the edentulous space.

Retentive arm has two horizontal components.

1. The occlusal portion minor connector and must be rigid.

2. The apical portion pass over the height of contour to engage the desired undercut.

Page 56: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Consideration:-

Sufficient clinical crown height.

Space between occlusal and apical arm.

Occlusal arm shouldn’t interfere within the occlusion

This clasp is indicated when the

1. soft tissue contour precludes use of a bar-type clasp and

2. when the reverse circlet cannot be considered becauseof a lack of occlusal clearance.

Page 57: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Half and half clasp

It consists of a circumferential retentive arm arising from one direction and a reciprocal arm arising from another.

used only for unilateral partial denture design.

Combination clasp

Given by O C Applegate.

This type of clasp consists of a wrought wire retentive clasp arm and a cast reciprocal clasp arm.

Wrought retentive arm is circular in cross section.

Used in deep undercut case.

Page 58: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Onlay clasp:-

Indicated when the occlusal surface of the abutmentlies noticeably apical to the occlusal plane.

occlusal surfaces of the abutments are covered withcrowns clasp arms arises

It establishes the occlusal plane.

Indicated in caries free individual.

Occlusal surface should be restored with gold acrylicinserts.

Page 59: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Infrabulge clasp/bar clasp/roach clasp.

Page 60: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Popularized by Ewing Roach in 1930 called it the Bar Clasp.

An infrabulge clasp approaches the undercut region of an abutment from an apical direction.

Push type retention.

Flexibility of clasp from length and taper.

More aesthetic than c clasp.

Ex :- y clasp, t clasp, I clasp.

Page 61: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Design rules…

1. The approach arm of an infrabulge clasp must not impinge onthe soft tissues adjacent to the abutment.

2. The approach arm should cross perpendicular to the freegingival margin. It shouldn’t impinge the underlying gingiva.

3. Shouldn’t be used in area of tissue undercut.

4. Uniform length and adequate taper should be given forsufficient flexibility.

5. The clasp terminus tip should be placed as apical as possibleon the abutment teeth.

Page 62: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

T clasp

Name is from the shape of the retentiveterminal.

Used in class 1 and class 2 situation.

distofacial undercut is seen.

The retentive terminal consist of horizontaltwo projection the one on the distal sideengages the undercut and the one on themesial side is above the height of contour.

T clasp is contraindicated when the height ofcontour is at the occlusal one thirds.

Page 63: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

In modified t clasp the non retentive arm isabsent.

Y clasp is similar to t clasp with the approacharm ending cervical to the retentive arm.

I clasp lack the horizontal retentive arms butonly a horizontal retentive tip.

Only the retentive tip contacts the abutmentsurface only at the undercut region.

The amount of contact is about 2 to 3mm inheight and 1.5 mm in width.

Page 64: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Other types of clasp philosophies.

RPI,

RPA

DeVan’s Clasp

VRHR clasp or Grasso clasp

Euipose clasp

Page 65: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

RPI concept.

RPI stands for Rest Proximal plate I bar.

Introduced by Kratochvil in 1963 it consisted of threedifferent parts connected to the metal framework.

Mesial occlusal rest, a distal guide plan, and an I barretainer.

The guide plan contacts the full length of the of theproximal surface of the tooth.

Page 66: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

This design had certain basic disadvantages:

Physiologic relief was required to prevent impingement

of gingival tissues during function.

Since the proximal plate covers a greater surface area

of the tooth, the functional forces are directed in the

horizontal direction, thus the tooth is located more

than the edentulous ridge.

Page 67: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Krol in 1973 made certain modifications in the design

under the “minimal coverage criteria”

Rest preparations are less extensive in the RPIsystem.

Rests extend only into the triangular fossa, even inmolar preparations, and canine rest

2-3mm guide plane in which only 1mm contact wasseen from the guide plate.

Arthur Krol JPD 1973;23;408-415

Page 68: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures
Page 69: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

BASIC PRINCIPLES OF RPI

CONCEPT

The mesiobuccal rest with the minor connector is placed

into the mesiolingual embrasure, but not contacting the

adjacent tooth.

A distal guiding plane, extending from the marginal ridge

to the junction of the middle and gingival thirds of the

abutment tooth, is prepared to receive a proximal plate

Page 70: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

The proximal plate in conjunction with the mesial occlusal

rest and minor connector provides the stabilizing and

reciprocal aspects of the clasp assembly.

The I-bar contributes to the retentive aspect and should be

located in the gingival third of the buccal or labial surface of

the abutment in 0.01 inch undercut.

Page 71: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Three different approaches

to RPI clasp

These approaches are based on the location of proximal plate ,location of the I bar

Page 72: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

RPA clasps

The rest-proximal plate-Aker’s clasp was developed and

described by Eliason in 1983.

It consists of a mesial occlusal rest, proximal plate and a

circumferential clasp arm, which arises from the superior

portion of the proximal plate and extends around the

tooth to engage the mesial undercut.

Page 73: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

De VAN CLASP

Also called as the mirror view clasp

Two occlusal rest on the lingual side of the teeth.

M.M.DeVan JPD 1955;5,208-14

Page 74: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

VRHR Clasp

The vertical reciprocal horizontal retentive arm concept was developed by Grasso in 1980 and is characterized by:

A distal occlusal rest supported by a minor connector.

A lingual vertical reciprocal component originating from the major connector.

A horizontal retentive arm attached to either the major connector or the retention latticework for the denture base.

Joseph Grasso JPD 1980,43;618-21

Page 75: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Equipoise clasp

Proposed by J. J. Goodman in 1990, it is an esthetic retentive

concept for distal extension situations.

Rests are placed away from edentulous span. Vertical inter-

proximal reduction of 1 mm between abutment and adjacent

tooth is done.

Optional bucco-lingual retentive groove at mid and gingival

third junction on distal surface of abutment tooth is provided.

Quintessence Int. 1996

May;27(5):333-40.

Page 76: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Metal free-

1. Natural-flex

2. Optiflex

3. Proflex clear wire

4. Valplast

5. Cu-sil

Page 77: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Occlusally and gingivally approaching clasps:

Relative merits and demerits

Page 78: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Bar claspThe bar clasp approaches the

undercut from below the height of contour pushes towards the occlusal surface abutment tooth

• Easier to seat and more difficult to remove

Circumferential clasp

• Above the height of contour • Pulls towards the occlusal

surface from the undercut to resist dislodgement.

retention

Page 79: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Bar clasp

It is more flexible because of which it provides less bracing or stability against lateral stresses.

Circumferential clasp

• Because of its rigidity it provides very good stability or

bracing

bracing

Page 80: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Bar clasp

It allows a certain degree of functional movement of the distal

extension base dissipate the stresses and lessen the load on

the abutment

Circumferential clasp

Potential to torque abutment teeth in distal extension based

partial denture situations.

Stress breaking effect

Page 81: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Bar clasp

Minimal tooth contact and less damage to tooth

Circumferential clasp

More tooth contact leading to food accumulation

Contact with tooth structure

Page 82: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Bar clasp

Minimum relief can lead to tissue damage to mucosa under the approach arm

Circumferential clasp

Damage to gingiva can take place during improper

removal of clasp

Damage to oral tissues

Page 83: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Bar clasp

Very less metal display so high aesthetics

Circumferential clasp

Increased metal display so poor Esthetics.

Esthetics

Page 84: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

INTRACORONAL RETAINERS/

precision attachments

Page 85: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

The intracoronal retainer is usually regarded as an internalattachment or precision attachment.

Definition:-

“A retainer consisting of a metal receptacle (matrix) and a

closely fitting part (patrix); the matrix is usually contained within

the normal or expanded contours of the crown on the abutment

tooth and the patrix is attached to a pontic or the removable

partial denture framework.”

Page 86: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

INDICATIONS

To provide movable joint in Removable Bridgework, fixed removable bridges.

To stabilize unilateral saddles.

Pier abutments.

Titled molars. F.P.D's in severely misaligned abutments.

Use in Over dentures (different forms of retainer are bar, telescopic, use of auxillary attachments).

Fixed removable implant restorations.

Page 87: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

LIMITATIONS

1. Large pulp size which is usually related to the age of

patient.

2. Length of the clinical crown, not used in short or

abraded teeth.(6mm crown)

3. Expensive

4. Distal extension denture bases.

Page 88: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

ADVANTAGES

1. Esthetically acceptable, because not much of metal display

like extracoronal retainers.

2. It is preferred in many of the situation because of its

vertical support through a rest seat located more favorable

to the horizontal axis of the abutment tooth.

Page 89: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

3. Stimulation to the underlying tissues greater when internal

attachment are used because of the intermittent vertical

massage.

4. It permits proper tooth form to be maintained and allows

for control of vertical, mesiodistal and buccolingual

displacement of the prosthesis.

Page 90: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

5. It provides for excellent retention of the prosthesis on

account of frictional resistance between opposing

parallel vertical walls that serve to limit movement and

resist removal of the partial denture.

Page 91: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Disadvantages of intra coronal

retainers

1. They require preparation of abutment tooth and

casting.

2. Difficult clinical and laboratory procedure.

3. They eventually wear, result in loss of frictional

resistance to denture removal.

Page 92: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

4. Difficult to repair and replace.

5. They are effective in longer teeth and least effective

in shorter teeth.

6. Difficult to place completely in the abutment teeth.

Page 93: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

MATERIAL OF CHOICE

Pt, Iridoplatinum, Gold and Pt, Gold and Pd.

Type III and IV type of gold is to be used for crown castings.

Base metal alloys are also used now a days as low cost

2 alternate ways to construct crown and rest seat.

Rest seat may be cast against the full coverage restoration

Rest seat may be soldered into place.

Page 94: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Classification

Classification by Good Kind and Baker in 1976 :

1)Intra coronal

a. resilient

b. non resilient

Page 95: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Intracoronal retainers

Frictional resistance.

Tapered and parallel-walled boxed and tubes.

Adjustable metal plates

Springs

Studs:

Locks

Magnetic resistance.

Page 96: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

How To Choose An Attachment?

It is the length of attachment, not its width that is main criteria inchoosing attachments.

For each length there are 3 different sizes (width) of precision attachments(anterior, bicuspid, molar.)

Width is measured from one side of rest to other.

Full length of a precision attachment is 8 mm for full benefit of bracing,support and retention a minimal of 5mm height is must.

This means that the clinical length of crown must be at least 7 mm so as toaccommodate an attachment of 5mm and in addition a minimum of 2mmbetween the gingival floor of attachment and gingival margin.

Otherwise a periodontal problem may be created.

Page 97: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Precision attachment

selection

Kennedy’s class I and class II partially edentulous

arches

The most difficult type of treatment plan.

Some practitioners advocate non rigid and resilient attachments and some advocate

resilient attachment in distal extension to minimize rotation and torquing of the

abutment tooth, when the components of an attachment are rigidly connected.

Int J Prosthodont. 1990 Mar-Apr;3(2):169-74

Page 98: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Another philosophy , known as the stable base precision attachment

RPD concept or floating denture base concept recommends

incorporation of rigid internal attachments and a cast metal base

made from mucostatic impression of the residual ridge.

The male portion of the attachment is connected to the denture

base , allowing the complete seating within the abutment.

Page 99: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Kennedy’s class III partially edentulous arch.

• Rigid internal attachments are recommended .

• Provides good retention, support and brazing because of its rigid

interlocking components.

• If the posterior abutment prognosis is questionable then a resilient

type of attachments are recommended with anterior abutment.

Page 100: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Kennedy’s class IV partially edentulous arch

The ideal RPD design for such situation

involves the use of a tissue bar placed close to

the edentulous ridge and connected as a fixed

unit to the abutment teeth on either side of

the space using crowns.

Page 101: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Conclusion

Keep the prosthesis design as simple as possible…

Make RPD more comfortable, more efficient andaffordable to the patient.

Page 102: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

References

1. Clinical removable prosthodontics:- STEWART’S 3rd edition

2. Mc cracken removable partial denture prosthodontics – 12th edition.

3. Davenport J.C., Baskar R.M., Heath J.R., Ralph J.P. “A color atlas of RPD”, Wolfe Medical Publications Ltd., 1988.

4. Krol A.J. “Clasp design for extension base RPD”. J. Prosthet. Dent., 1973; 29 : 408-415.

5. M.M.DeVan JPD 1955;5,208-14

6. Joseph Grasso JPD 1980,43;618-21

7. Quintessence Int. 1996 May;27(5):333-40.

8. Burns DR, Ward JE. Int J Prosthodont. 1990 Mar-Apr;3(2):169-74

Page 103: Direct retainers in removable partial dentures

Thank you