dir. of religious affairs vs. bayot
TRANSCRIPT
8/19/2019 Dir. of Religious Affairs vs. Bayot
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/dir-of-religious-affairs-vs-bayot 1/1
THE DIRECTOR OF RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS vs. Estanislao Bayot
A.C. No. L1117
Mar! "#$ 1%&&
FACTS' Estanislao Bayot, an attorney-at-law, is being charged withmalpractice for publishing an advertisement in the Sunday Tribune oering legal
services.
“arriage license promptly secured thru our assistance ! the annoyance of
delay or publicity avoided if desired, and marriage arranged to wishes of parties.
"onsultation on any matter free for the poor. Everything con#dential.
$egal assistance service
%& Escolta, anila, 'oom, %()
Tel. &*%+(.
Thru his attorney, he admitted having caused its publication and
prayed for the indulgence and mercy of the "ourt, promising not to repeat such
professional misconduct in the future and to abide himself to the strict ethical rules
of the law profession.
ISSUE' hether or not an attorney may be charged with malpractice for
advertising legal services.
RULING' $aw is a profession, not a trade. The lawyer degrades himself and his
profession who stoops to and adopts the practices of mercantilism by advertising
his services or oering them to the public. s a member of the bar, he de#les the
temple of /ustice with mercenary activities as the money changers of old de#led the
temple of 0ehovah. The most worth and eective advertisement possible, even fora young lawyer, . . . is the establishment of a well merited reputation for
professional capacity and #delity to trust. This cannot be forced but must be the
outcome of character and conduct. 1"anon &2, "ode of Ethics.3
"onsidering his plea for leniency and his promise not to repeat the
misconduct, the "ourt is of the opinion and so decided that the respondent should
be, as he hereby is, r()ri*an+(+.