dimitriu sr 15 poster

1
BACKGROUND In 1996, Garetz and coworkers discovered that supersaturated solutions can be induced to crystallize when illuminated with a high- intensity laser beam and named this process non- photochemical laser induced nucleation (NPLIN). Although many other ways of causing supersaturated solutions to crystallize were already known, NPLIN is especially significant because it represents a non-chemical way of forcing different polymorphs of the solute to emerge for some substances, such as glycine. Since different polymorphs of a substance exhibit differences in properties such as solubility, density and bioavailability, the ability to select a particular polymorph of a substance bears great importance in the pharmaceutical industry. What determines which polymorph is formed in NPLIN is the polarization state of the laser beam, a process called polarization switching. To explain this phenomenon, Garetz et al. hypothesized that NPLIN was based on an optical Kerr alignment: the electric field of the electromagnetic wave (light) induces a certain kind of alignment in the molecules, causing them to organize and eventually form the crystal. MARIA ANDREEA DIMITRIU BS Biomolecular Science 2018 Faculty: Bruce Garetz, Janice Aber LASER-INDUCED CRYSTALLIZATION IN THE PRESENCE OF GOLD NANOPARTICLES Figure 2: Pictures of 4 different crystals after separation and drying ABSTRACT The hypothesis Garetz and coworkers reached, that NPLIN is based on an electric-field-induced alignment, suggests that if one can enhance the strength of the electric field of the laser beam, one could observe NPLIN at lower light intensities. This idea constitutes the basis of our current experiment, which studies the effect that gold nanorods have on solutions of 1.5 supersaturation of glycine dissolved in aqueous sodium citrate when they are shot with linearly- polarized light of wavelength of 1064 nm in the near-infrared spectral region. We have obtained gold nanorods that exhibit plasmon resonances near this wavelength (resonance wavelengths ranging from 660 to 980 nanometers) that magnify the strength of the local electric field. This local electric field amplification makes us expect that samples to which gold nanorods were added will exhibit a higher laser-induced nucleation rate than the ones not containing gold nanorods, and that the intensity threshold for nucleation will be lower in the presence of gold nanorods. METHODS AND TECHNIQUE This experiment’s goal is to draw conclusions regarding differences between spontaneous and laser- induced nucleations. Nucleation is a stochastic process, so large populations must be analyzed in order to obtain significant statistics. Thus, for each kind of solution analyzed several 30-sample batches are prepared. All samples prepared for this experiment are solutions of supersaturation between 1.49 and 1.51 made with 0.675 grams of glycine and 2.000 grams of solvent. The three kinds of solutions being analyzed are: aqueous solutions (where the solvent is pure water), solutions whose solvent is a 2mM aqueous solution of sodium citrate, and solutions made with sodium citrate to which 100 µL of gold nanorods solution are also added. To prepare solutions, we use test tubes of 1.3 centimeter diameter with caps. First, the tubes and caps are cleaned: they are filled with a 1% solution of Micro90 detergent, placed in a Crest Tru-Sweep Ultrasonic Cleaner and sonicated for 60 minutes at 40°C and power 9. Then, the tubes and caps are rinsed 10 times with UV-filtered water and placed in a Fischer Isotemp Oven to dry overnight. The clean tubes are used to prepare the supersaturated solutions: the necessary quantities of each substance are added in the tube, the tube is capped and numbered. Next the samples are sonicated at 60°C and power 5 for around 24 hours, until the glycine dissolves. Then, the sonicator is turned off and all tubes are left inside to slowly cool to room temperature overnight, forming the supersaturated metastable solutions. Solutions are aged for a week during which they are checked for spontaneous nucleation. After a week, the solutions that have not spontaneously nucleated are illuminated with the laser. The optical setup that was used to shoot the samples is shown in Figure 1. The laser used is a Quanta-Ray® Nd:YAG laser, the wavelength is 1064 nanometers, the frequency is 10 Hz; each pulse’s length is 9 nanoseconds. The apertures in the setup shrink the beam to protect the polarizer, which allows only linearly-polarized light to pass. The lens was added to increase the intensity of the beam. Samples are placed at 32 centimeters from the lens, where the laser intensity is around 350 mW/cm 2 , and each sample is shot for 1 minute at maximum energy, 70 Joules per pulse. The mean power obtained in these conditions is around 2.5 Watts. Solutions shot are being checked for nucleation for 24 hours after the shooting, which is the time frame during which it can be assumed that the nucleation is laser-induced. All crystals that are formed are L1 = Laser; A1 = Aperture 1; A2 = Aperture 2; P = Polarizer; L2 = Lens; T = Test Tube Figure 1: Optical Setup Refrences: [1] Sun X. 2008. Polymorph Control in Non-Photochemical Light- Induced Nucleation and Optical Kerr Study [dissertation]. Polytechnic University. [2] Garetz, B.A., & Aber, J. E., & Goddard, N.L., & Young, R.G., & Meyerson, A.S. (1996). Nonphotochemical, Polarization- Dependent, Laser-Induced Nucleation in Supersaturated Aqueous Urea Solutions. Physical Review Letters, 77, 3475-3476. [3] Matic, J., & Sun, X., & Garetz, B.G. (2005). Intensity, Wavelength, and Polarization Dependence of Nonphotochemical Laser-Induced Nucleation in Supersaturated Aqueous Urea Solutions. Crystal Growth & Design, 5, 1565-1567. RESULTS AND FUTURE WORK Batch # Solvent SN # Shot NPLIN % NPLIN 1 Water 2 13 6 46% 6 Citrate 2 25 12 48% 7 Citrate 3 27 9 33% 8 Citrate 9 20 7 35% 9 Citrate 6 24 17 71% 10 Citrate 4 23 12 52% 11 Citrate 12 15 11 73% 12 Citrate 4 25 13 52% 13 Citrate 3 25 15 60% 14 Citrate 10 15 13 86% 15 Citrate 13 12 7 75% Conclusions regarding the nucleation rates of the solutions can be drawn from observation of a large population. The table above shows details regarding the number and type of nucleations for a total of 330 samples. First, it is important to understand that metastable solutions are extremely sensitive to environmental factors such as temperature or movement and conclusions should not be drawn without taking this into account. While most batches showed a relatively low number of spontaneous nucleasions (SN): 2 to 6, batches 11, 14 and 15 exhibited a much higher number. We concluded that those batches were disturbed by constructions taking place in the building, as the batches had just been taken out of the bath at the time the lab was affected by construction. The same batches also exhibit a higher percentage of laser- induced nucleation (NPLIN), which would confirm our suspicions. Excluding those batches, we can conclude that at the intensity of 350 MW/cm 2 (measured at the front of the tube), between 50 and 70% of the samples made with aqueous sodium citrate will nucleate when illuminated with the laser. Also taking into consideration previously reported results, it is apparent that samples made with pure water exhibit a slightly lower laser-induced nucleation rate (below 50%) at the same intensity. From the same data it is observable that as samples age, they become less probable to nucleate when illuminated by the laser

Upload: maria-andreea-dimitriu

Post on 13-Apr-2017

59 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Dimitriu SR 15 Poster

BACKGROUND

In 1996, Garetz and coworkers discovered that supersaturated solutions can be induced to crystallize when illuminated with a high-intensity laser beam and named this process non-photochemical laser induced nucleation (NPLIN). Although many other ways of causing supersaturated solutions to crystallize were already known, NPLIN is especially significant because it represents a non-chemical way of forcing different polymorphs of the solute to emerge for some substances, such as glycine. Since different polymorphs of a substance exhibit differences in properties such as solubility, density and bioavailability, the ability to select a particular polymorph of a substance bears great importance in the pharmaceutical industry.

What determines which polymorph is formed in NPLIN is the polarization state of the laser beam, a process called polarization switching. To explain this phenomenon, Garetz et al. hypothesized that NPLIN was based on an optical Kerr alignment: the electric field of the electromagnetic wave (light) induces a certain kind of alignment in the molecules, causing them to organize and eventually form the crystal.

MARIA ANDREEA DIMITRIU BS Biomolecular Science 2018 Faculty: Bruce Garetz, Janice Aber

LASER-INDUCED CRYSTALLIZATION IN THE PRESENCE OF GOLD NANOPARTICLES

Figure 2: Pictures of 4 different crystals after separation and drying

ABSTRACT

The hypothesis Garetz and coworkers reached, that NPLIN is based on an electric-field-induced alignment, suggests that if one can enhance the strength of the electric field of the laser beam, one could observe NPLIN at lower light intensities. This idea constitutes the basis of our current experiment, which studies the effect that gold nanorods have on solutions of 1.5 supersaturation of glycine dissolved in aqueous sodium citrate when they are shot with linearly-polarized light of wavelength of 1064 nm in the near-infrared spectral region. We have obtained gold nanorods that exhibit plasmon resonances near this wavelength (resonance wavelengths ranging from 660 to 980 nanometers) that magnify the strength of the local electric field. This local electric field amplification makes us expect that samples to which gold nanorods were added will exhibit a higher laser-induced nucleation rate than the ones not containing gold nanorods, and that the intensity threshold for nucleation will be lower in the presence of gold nanorods.

METHODS AND TECHNIQUE

This experiment’s goal is to draw conclusions regarding differences between spontaneous and laser-induced nucleations. Nucleation is a stochastic process, so large populations must be analyzed in order to obtain significant statistics. Thus, for each kind of solution analyzed several 30-sample batches are prepared. All samples prepared for this experiment are solutions of supersaturation between 1.49 and 1.51 made with 0.675 grams of glycine and 2.000 grams of solvent. The three kinds of solutions being analyzed are: aqueous solutions (where the solvent is pure water), solutions whose solvent is a 2mM aqueous solution of sodium citrate, and solutions made with sodium citrate to which 100 µL of gold nanorods solution are also added. To prepare solutions, we use test tubes of 1.3 centimeter diameter with caps. First, the tubes and caps are cleaned: they are filled with a 1% solution of Micro90 detergent, placed in a Crest Tru-Sweep Ultrasonic Cleaner and sonicated for 60 minutes at 40°C and power 9. Then, the tubes and caps are rinsed 10 times with UV-filtered water and placed in a Fischer Isotemp Oven to dry overnight. The clean tubes are used to prepare the supersaturated solutions: the necessary quantities of each substance are added in the tube, the tube is capped and numbered. Next the samples are sonicated at 60°C and power 5 for around 24 hours, until the glycine dissolves. Then, the sonicator is turned off and all tubes are left inside to slowly cool to room temperature overnight, forming the supersaturated metastable solutions. Solutions are aged for a week during which they are checked for spontaneous nucleation. After a week, the solutions that have not spontaneously nucleated are illuminated with the laser.

The optical setup that was used to shoot the samples is shown in Figure 1. The laser used is a Quanta-Ray® Nd:YAG laser, the wavelength is 1064 nanometers, the frequency is 10 Hz; each pulse’s length is 9 nanoseconds. The apertures in the setup shrink the beam to protect the polarizer, which allows only linearly-polarized light to pass. The lens was added to increase the intensity of the beam. Samples are placed at 32 centimeters from the lens, where the laser intensity is around 350 mW/cm2, and each sample is shot for 1 minute at maximum energy, 70 Joules per pulse. The mean power obtained in these conditions is around 2.5 Watts. Solutions shot are being checked for nucleation for 24 hours after the shooting, which is the time frame during which it can be assumed that the nucleation is laser-induced. All crystals that are formed are separated from the remaining solution, dried using a vacuum pump, and stored. Finally, the crystals are analyzed using single-crystal or powder X-ray diffraction to determine details regarding the polymorph of each crystal.

L1 = Laser; A1 = Aperture 1; A2 = Aperture 2; P = Polarizer; L2 = Lens; T = Test Tube

Figure 1: Optical Setup

Refrences:[1] Sun X. 2008. Polymorph Control in Non-Photochemical Light-Induced Nucleation and Optical Kerr Study [dissertation]. Polytechnic University. [2] Garetz, B.A., & Aber, J. E., & Goddard, N.L., & Young, R.G., & Meyerson, A.S. (1996). Nonphotochemical, Polarization-Dependent, Laser-Induced Nucleation in Supersaturated Aqueous Urea Solutions. Physical Review Letters, 77, 3475-3476. [3] Matic, J., & Sun, X., & Garetz, B.G. (2005). Intensity, Wavelength, and Polarization Dependence of Nonphotochemical Laser-Induced Nucleation in Supersaturated Aqueous Urea Solutions. Crystal Growth & Design, 5, 1565-1567.

RESULTS AND FUTURE WORKBatch # Solvent SN # Shot NPLIN % NPLIN

1 Water 2 13 6 46%6 Citrate 2 25 12 48%7 Citrate 3 27 9 33%8 Citrate 9 20 7 35%9 Citrate 6 24 17 71%

10 Citrate 4 23 12 52%11 Citrate 12 15 11 73%12 Citrate 4 25 13 52%13 Citrate 3 25 15 60%14 Citrate 10 15 13 86%15 Citrate 13 12 7 75%

Conclusions regarding the nucleation rates of the solutions can be drawn from observation of a large population. The table above shows details regarding the number and type of nucleations for a total of 330 samples. First, it is important to understand that metastable solutions are extremely sensitive to environmental factors such as temperature or movement and conclusions should not be drawn without taking this into account. While most batches showed a relatively low number of spontaneous nucleasions (SN): 2 to 6, batches 11, 14 and 15 exhibited a much higher number. We concluded that those batches were disturbed by constructions taking place in the building, as the batches had just been taken out of the bath at the time the lab was affected by construction. The same batches also exhibit a higher percentage of laser-induced nucleation (NPLIN), which would confirm our suspicions. Excluding those batches, we can conclude that at the intensity of 350 MW/cm2 (measured at the front of the tube), between 50 and 70% of the samples made with aqueous sodium citrate will nucleate when illuminated with the laser. Also taking into consideration previously reported results, it is apparent that samples made with pure water exhibit a slightly lower laser-induced nucleation rate (below 50%) at the same intensity. From the same data it is observable that as samples age, they become less probable to nucleate when illuminated by the laser (batches 7 and 8 were the oldest and had the lowest nucleation rates). Further work would involve performing X-ray diffraction on all crystals obtained for each batch, in order to be able to establish polymorph formation trends with respect to the nucleation type, as well as any possible effect that the gold nanorods would have on the polymorph formation, which would be noticeable when comparing results for samples containing gold nanorods to those of regular samples.