© Apr-18 Math2Market GmbH 1

Sven Linden

Tom Cvjetkovic

Erik Glatt

Jens-Oliver Schwarz

Andreas Wiegmann

Geo-CT Meeting

20. April 2015

Digital Rock Physics

© May-16 Math2Market GmbH 2

Detailed In-situ DRP workflow I

Sampling Imaging Processing

Cropping

Noise reduction

Artifact reduction1

1 H. Andrä et al., „Digital rock physics benchmarks—Part I: Imaging and segmentation,“ Computers & Geosciences, 2013 (43), pp. 25-32.

© May-16 Math2Market GmbH 3

ImportGeoDetailed In-situ DRP workflow IIMulti-stage watershed algorithm1

1 H. Andrä et al., „Digital rock physics benchmarks—Part I: Imaging and segmentation,“ Computers & Geosciences, 2013 (43), pp. 25-32.

CT-Scan

Segmentation

Solids Pore space

© May-16 Math2Market GmbH 4

RockDictDetailed In-situ DRP Workflow III

Numericalcompression

Absolutepermeability

© May-16 Math2Market GmbH 5

Comparison lab versus DRP

Lab measurement DRP simulation

Image courtesy of M. Halisch (LIAG)

© May-16 Math2Market GmbH 6

GeoDictMath2Market Digital Rock Physics Portfolio

Geometrical parameters

Flowparameters

Electricalparameters

Mechanical parameters

Porosity

Pore size distribution

Percolation

Surface area

Tortuosity

Absolute permeability

Relative permeability

Multi-scale flow

Capillary pressure

curve

Formation factor

Resistivity index

Saturation exponent

Cementation

exponent

Elastic moduli

Stiffness

In-Situ conditions

© May-16 Math2Market GmbH 7

Thank you for your attention!