digital engineering cobie feedback from phase 2 … events/bim cobie...opportunities/new projects to...
TRANSCRIPT
Digital EngineeringCOBieFeedback from Phase 2 TrialNovember 2013
openBIM/COBie field Trials
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
Introduction
A bit about LORA bit about IFC and our Information ChallengesA bit about the trialThoughts on COBieThoughts in General
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
2016UK Gov
Mandate Level 2 BIM
2017LOR target to “upskill” all
staff resources
2013LOR over 50 projects
worldwide tracked against the BIM deliverables
2012Vision - LOR tender
opportunities/new projects to “start in BIM world”
Hinkley
2011Central DE team grown in
UK to over 50
2011Leadenhall project bid process commences
2010Centralise strategy and
resources
Work WinningCore Services 1 – 13
<2009Ad hoc application across
projects
2013LOR branding to
Digital EngineeringHinkley = DE
2012Acquisition of Symmetry
Our Journey
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved 4
Digital Engineering
Our GSR & UBO
Digital Engineering
DfMA
Engineering Excellence
Delivery Model
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
IFC Timeline
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
The Current Picture - Chaotic
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
Facilities/Asset Management Specification
GeoSpatial Location of Objects & Elements
Around 350 Individual ‘Pieces’ of Information
Costing Requirements
Environmental Requirements
Energy Analysis Requirements
Building Program & Project Meta Data
Building Program & Project Meta Data
Manufacturer Specific Information
Physical Properties of Objects; Dimensions etc
Space/Fixtures Compliance
Code Compliance/ Occupant Safety
Ordering & Procurement Requirements
Construction Logistics & Sequencing
Building Commissioning Requirements
150 from Spec
100 from Manufacturers
150 Can come from the specification i.e. Lux Level. Provided we source the right information and use the right tools
& 100 are LOR Managed
Leaving around 100 to be ‘Managed’ through the Design, Delivery and Operational process by LOR – i.e. Order Placed Date.Needs suitable tools and processes to be achieved .
100 Are manufacturer specific i.e. Warranty Durationprovided we can access their content .
But
The Challenge – Volume of Data & Variety of Sources
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
Unique ID 001
Is the door the right spec?
Is the door the door the right price?
Has the Door been ordered?
When will it be delivered?
Is the room available?
Has the door been installed?
Has the door been approved?
Has the door been paid for?
Procurement Planning Commercial Design Management
The same unique ID in a door could be entered once, and used multiple times
The ID can be entered in to a model but by whom if the product is external?Need smarter tools and processes to effectively manage this information
Bid
D
eliv
ery
Owner/Occupier
Does the door have an asset tag?FM
The Challenge – Managing & Leveraging
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
External Protocols& Documentation i.e. CIC, AEC,
BG6, CPIx PAS/BS 1192 etc
Internal Protocols
Option 2 COBie principles; This Parameter must be populated i.e. FireRating But not prescriptive as to how
Option 3 Enhance the COBie principles; This Parameter must be populated and be named Prescriptively i.e.
FireRating = FD30s
Option 1 Give all the relevant elements in the model a Fire Rating
Protocol Options
Mindful of the impact and context of relationships with supply chain partners
The Challenge – LOD & Transformation
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
The Trial – Our Tools
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
Checking
2 tasks to be completed;One space and Multiple components identified as unclassifiedNote Stories above ground floor don’t have names
The Trial – Classification
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
Classification of Spaces Relatively Easy
Classification sets not picking up relevant model elements.
Syntax in SMC is underscores (correct) ArchiCAD uses hyphens
Exported to excel, fixed and re-imported
Repeated for Types and Systems
The Trial – Classification
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
Listing Spaces
The Trial – Classification
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
Listing Spaces had to be mapped
‘Category’ was re-mapped to embedded Uniclass2 data, and column ‘Name’ was reverted to ‘Category’
The Trial – Classification
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
Listing Spaces had to be mapped But
‘Description’ column to link to an ArchiCAD property set, no ‘Classification References’ visible in the drop-down button (the zones in ArchiCAD have an IFC Property Set with this name).
Also ArchiCAD property set ‘IFC Attributes’ is not visible
The Trial – Classification
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
COBie sheet produced for spaces!
The Trial – Classification
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
Systems All items remained unclassified...
TypesOnly 2 items are classified...so what was special about these two?
Classification of Systems and Types More Difficult
The Trial – Classification
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
Classification Duct Silencers -The only ones with a classification
The Trial – Classification
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
Classification Duct Silencers
Other ducts analysed don’t have IFC Property called ‘Classification Reference’ attached.
Appears Solibri doesn't detected IFC data from the IFC Type Product level in ArchiCAD, only from the IFCEntity level.
The Trial – Classification
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
Fixing the problem
To map Uniclass2 data from ArchiCAD for IFC Entities – classify each IFC EntitiesAll foundation pads needed classifying, then all the components were classified(excluding all openings and all spaces).
The Trial – Classification
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
Listing The Types
The Trial – Issues
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
Listing Types
‘Category’ was re-mapped to the IFC model embedded Uniclass2 data, and column ‘Name’ was reverted to ‘Category’
The Trial – Issues
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
COBie sheet produced for spaces
The Trial – Issues
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
Strengths• Its a start...its a standard like HTML or SMTP it’s there to be used• It could reduce some of the transformation that occurs• Helps foster conversations on information, the right content at the right time
Development Areas• Some confusion between the product and the process• Some think it will just drop out like a schedule• Having to edit/reclassify the source model• Won’t ensure the outline specification, brief or KPI’s are being met on its own• Still work to do to integrate with FM systems and providers – What is COBie?• Drops 1 + 2 are the ‘easy bit’ its all about classification
3-5 need real thought & leadership• Space Race for manufactures content – who will ‘win’?• COBie not de facto – think about how to apply COBie; Who, What, When, Where, How & Why• Data Maturity – when is does it become reliable? i.e. Cost & Performance
Thoughts on COBie
© Laing O’Rourke 2012, all rights reserved
BIM for FM - emerging field and yet to be completely provenInteroperability - Sharing nomenclature and geometry are the biggest barriers to full BIMData standards critical - Software life = 12 months, life of asset = 100 yearsThe Cost of BIM is more than just the creation – need to include for;
1) As Built models not just As Designed/Intended2) The translation of the construction BIM to something useful in FM3) Maintaining that BIM over the lifecycle
Classification is vital but things change post occupancy and during D & CWrong or unsuitable data is worse than no data at allPeople are important – Sophisticated tools/process won’t mean that behaviours & culture followBalance the juxtaposition between solving important problems and creating inertiaProblems precede Solutions; not the other way around
Some things off My Wish list...Need BIM Procurement > Consultants encouraging model sharing > Standard COBie IFC Psets> Vendors share geometry via IFC > Uniclass2 Resolution (No Trades!)
Thoughts on AIM...and...Life in General