differential model for 2d turbulence

26
Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006 Differential Model for 2D Turbulence Sergey Nazarenko, Warwick, UK In collaboration with Victor Lvov, Weizmann JETP Letters, 2006, Vol. 83, No. 12, pp. 541–545.

Upload: teige

Post on 16-Jan-2016

34 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Differential Model for 2D Turbulence. Sergey Nazarenko, Warwick, UK In collaboration with Victor Lvov, Weizmann JETP Letters, 2006, Vol. 83, No. 12, pp. 541–545. Leith’68 model of 3D turbulence. Kolmogorov solution:. Thermodynamic energy equipartition:. “Warm” cascade. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Sergey Nazarenko, Warwick, UK

In collaboration with Victor Lvov, Weizmann

JETP Letters, 2006, Vol. 83, No. 12, pp. 541–545.

Page 2: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Leith’68 model of 3D turbulence

Kolmogorov solution:

Thermodynamic energy equipartition:

Page 3: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

“Warm” cascade

Analytical solution with both cascade and thermodynamic components, Connaugton & Nazarenko’2004.

Describes the bottleneck phenomenon.

Page 4: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

“warm cascade” (Connaughton, Nazarenko, 2004)

Cascade scaling at low k Thermodynamic at large k

Page 5: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

“gelation” and anomalous wake

Self-similar solution reaching infinite k in finite time Spectrum in the wake is steeper than Kolmogorov

Page 6: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Setup of Kolmogorov

After reaching infinite k, the Kolmogorov spectrum sets up as a reflected from infinity wave

Typical for all finite capacity spectra Previously seen in Weak MHD

turbulence (Galtier, Nazarenko, Newell, Pouquet, 2000)

Page 7: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Page 8: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Page 9: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Page 10: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Page 11: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Page 12: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Superfluid turbulence

Turbulent superfluid and normal components coupled via mutual friction, Lvov, Nazarenko, Volovik’2005; Vinen 2005; Lvov, Nazarenko, Skrbek’2006.

Page 13: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Systems with dual cascades

Gravity wave turbulence on water surface, Hasselmann & Hasselmann’85; Dyachenko, Newell, Pushkarev, Zakharov’91

Page 14: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Differential model for 2D turbulence (DM2D)

Lvov and Nazarenko’2006.

Page 15: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Invariants of DM2D

Page 16: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Energy and Enstrophy Fluxes

Page 17: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Cascade solutions

Page 18: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Predictions for Kolmogorov constants

Ihihara & Kaneda’2001; Danilov & Gurarie’2001 DNS:

CQ/CP=1.9/6=0.32

Lvov, Pomyalov, Proccacia’2002

Page 19: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Effect of friction

Change of scaling like in superfluids?

Change of scaling due to friction in passive scalar (Chertkov’98) and 2D turbulence Boffetta et al’2005)

Page 20: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Nastrom-Gage spectrum

Nastrom & Gage’84,

Friction?Gkioulekas’0

5

Page 21: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Not here…

Now, the -3 exponent is in resonance with the inverse cascade exponent.

Hence a log rather than power-law correction.

Page 22: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Direct cascade with friction

Page 23: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Inverse cascade with friction

Page 24: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Summary of friction effects

There is no Nastrom-Gage shape Friction arrests both cascades at finite scales.

Page 25: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Lilly’89 model Get rid of the thermodynamic

solutions – 2nd order equation:

NG spectrum, Lilly’89

Page 26: Differential Model for 2D Turbulence

Talk by S. Nazarenko, July 18, 2006

Summary

Differential models: put something in in order to get more useful stuff out.

Time evolution. Setup of cascades. Rate of total energy and enstrophy decay.

Mixed solutions with simultaneous cascades and thermal components.

Friction effects and other modifications.