developing standards of professional activity with semantic mediawiki
DESCRIPTION
Standard is a document to describe the professional. I'm talking how the standards can be written by the community of the professioals using Semantic MediaWiki-based tool. The talk have been presented at SMWCon Fall 2013TRANSCRIPT
SMW for professional standards
Yury Katkov
2
Outline
• What is the professional standard?• Create professional standards today: who and
how• Our solution– Implementing the structure of standard in SMW– Tools for proposing and evaluating versions of
standard parts– Generating the final document
• Pilot
3
What’s the professional standard?
• The standard describes the professional: – What he should do at job– What he should know about the world– What skills should he have– What personal qualities are required for his job
• Standards are used for:– Designing the programs in universities– Designing the requirements for job candidates in
companites
4
What’s the professional standard?
• The standard describes the professional: – What he should do at job– What he should know about the world– What skills should he have– What personal qualities are required for his job
• Standards are used for:– Designing the programs in universities– Designing the requirements for job candidates in
companites
YUMMY!
Example: Demon Hunter
Levels of The professional
RESPONSIbilities
Searching for Demons
Beating the
hell out of demons
Skills
Crossbow mastery
Longbow mastery
Exorcism
SPELLS
UNLOCKING DOORS
KNOWLEDGE
Basic Demonogy
Demon Anatomy
UNDERSTANDING
of the ancient runes
Professionally important qualities
Strength
DExterity
Intelligence
VItality
Leadership and managerial Qualities
Cold Blood and self possesion
25
How we structure all that
• Standard consists of many working functions• Working function consists of: – Responsibility of the worker: type of task to perform– Skills that the worker need to perform the task– Knowledge needed for the task– Professional qualities needed for the task
• Working functions are grouped by:– Categories– Qualification levels
26
How we structure all that
• Standard consists of many working functions• Working function consists of: – Responsibility of the worker: type of task to perform– Skills that the worker need to perform the task– Knowledge needed for the task– Professional qualities needed for the task
• Working functions are grouped by:– Categories– Qualification levels
27
28
How we structure all that
• Standard consists of many working functions• Working function consists of: – Responsibility of the worker: type of task to perform– Skills that the worker need to perform the task– Knowledge needed for the task– Professional qualities needed for the task
• Working functions are grouped by:– Categories– Qualification levels
29
30
Working on the standard: actors
• Fathers of the standard– Small group– Describes the levels, categories– Make decisions about which working functions
will be included to the standard• Industry representatives• Moderators/Facilitators
31
Working on the standard: process
Describing levels
Describing categories
Creating working
functions
Voting for working
functions
Syncronizing the levels
Proposing the new
version of the standard
32
Implementation in SMWMartix of the standard
33
Implementation in SMWMartix of the standard
Implemented with templates!
34
Implementation in SMWMartix of the standard
Implemented with templates!
{{{#if{{{{[[ | ]]
| [[|]] |}}}}}}}
{{{{({{[[#ifeq{[[ | ]] | [[|))]] |}}}}}})}
{{{{{(#switch{{[[
| ]] | [[|]]
|}})#ask}}(}||}}
35
Implementation in SMWMartix of the standard
36
Implementation in SMWMartix of the standard
37
38
39
Voting
• People can vote for or against the working functions
• For now – only the simplest algorithm for average vote
• Super users can freeze the voting or fix any result
• All the results are semantified
40
Voting
41
Voting
• People can vote for or against the working functions
• For now – only the simplest algorithm for average vote
• Super users can freeze the voting or fix any result
• All the results are semantified
42
Voting
43
Why not prefer The Wiki Way?
• People are hesitant to make changes in each other’s content
• Edit wars are hard to understand• Most of the edits change the meaning of the
content• People are busy and prefer voting to writing
44
Evaluting the articles
• Participant can evaluate the working functions by several criteria
• First we’ve used ArticleFeedback extension• Now we’re using our own extension:– Any number of evaluation criteria– Different criteria for different categories– Various widgets for submitting the evaluation
45
Evaluting the articles
• Participant can evaluate the working functions by several criteria
• First we’ve used ArticleFeedback extension• Now we’re using our own extension:– Any number of evaluation criteria– Different criteria for different categories– Various widgets for submitting the evaluation
46
Evaluting the articles
47
Evaluting the articles
• Participant can evaluate the working functions by several criteria
• First we’ve used ArticleFeedback extension• Now we’re using our own extension:– Any number of evaluation criteria– Different criteria for different categories– Various widgets for submitting the evaluation
48
Evaluting the articles
49
Export to MS Word
• Component for export the standard to Word– To show the results to the government
• Extensively uses SMW queries in the code• Generating MS Word is still a horrible task– Hack: create your document template in MS
Word, convert it to html, fill it and rename it to doc
50
Export to MS Word
51
Export to MS Word
• Component for export the standard to Word– To show the results to the government
• Extensively uses SMW queries in the code• Generating MS Word is still a horrible task– Hack: create your document template in MS
Word, convert it to html, fill it and rename it to doc
52
Results and perspectives
• Pilot: standard for the manager is partly accepted by the government
• SMW was good for quickly prototyping the system
• We’ll continue to use SMW as the platform for designing the standards: – Creating reusable libraby of skills and
responcibilities– Define relationships between standards
53
Some other stuff we have
• More projects on strategic foresight and future studies
• Storytelling in wiki!• Some new result formats:– Chap-timeline– Xtags
• More of Semantic Glossary• New input tools:– Hierarchies– Preview input
Тел.: 8 (499) 506 74 31Эл. почта: [email protected]
Сайт: wikivote.ru