determining the level of technical and specific physical training in performance weightlifting

7/27/2019 Determining the Level of Technical and Specific Physical Training in Performance Weightlifting

1/6

THE ANNALS OF DUNAREA DE JOS UNIVERSITY OF GALATI

FASCICLE XV ISSN14549832 - 2011

period before competitions and the competition

improves and the model of team play and training, in

practice the idea of a modern game adapted technical

and tactical peculiarities of the age.

References1. Alexe, Niklas (1978) - Cyber modeling and programmingin contemporary theory and practice of athletic training.No EFS Magazine. 11.

2. Bota, I.; Colibaba - Evule, D. (1998) - Sports Games.Theory and Methodology, Publishing Bold.

3. Dragnea, A. (1987) - Measurement and evaluation inphysical education and sport; Ed Sports - Tourism

Bucharest.

4. Drjan, C-tin., Ionescu, Del.. (1997) - Training andperformance in junior basketball to children, teaching

and educational publishing house, Bucharest.5. Ghitescu Julia Gabriel, Daniela Alina Moanta (2008) -

Fundamentals of Basketball "Matrixrom House,

Bucharest.

DETERMINING THE LEVEL OF TECHNICAL AND SPECIFICPHYSICAL TRAINING IN PERFORMANCE WEIGHTLIFTING

Ulreanu Marius Viorel,

Ecological University of Bucharest

Abstract:The paper aims at determining the level of technical and specific physicaltraining in performance weightlifting. For this purpose we have considered that an

optimum relationship of technical training and specific physical training in

performance weightlifting will contribute to the improvement of performances

achieved in competition.The study was centered round the training programs in order to test the level of

technical and specific physical training; a monitoring of performance parameters

evolution has been made statistically. The statistical processing was done in Word

and KyPlot programs, calculating the usual statistical indices and the test of

linear correlation. To highlight the level of technical and specific physical training

during the training of performance weightlifters, a study was conducted within the

Weightlifting Olympic Team. The study was carried out throughout two annual

cycles period (2008 - 2009), formed of 10 macro-cycles, applied on a group of 9

athletes, aged 18-24, at juniors, youth and seniors classes.The results of the study highlight the level of technical and specific physical training

of the weightlifters-subjects of the study and the dynamics of their performances in

2008-2009 training cycles.

In conclusion, we are able to confirm that the provision of optimal relationships

between specific physical training and technical training in performance

weightlifting helps to improve performances in competition.

Key words: weightlifting, physical training, technical training, control trials,

performance.

IntroductionPhysical training is one of the most

important factors and, in some cases, the most

significant ingredient of sports training in

achieving the high performance. The main

objectives of physical training are the increase

of athletes physiological potential and the

development of the biometrical traits up to the

highest level (T. Bompa, 2002).

The specific physical training content is

mainly oriented towards the growth of effortcapacity that characterizes this sport branch,

and towards the increase of the involved motor

skills combined in a primarily and

differentiated way. Thus is determined the

specific yield. In some sport branches, the

performance is stri ctly establ ished by thedevelopment level of a motor skill (in

weightlifting by strength, in rowing by

endurance) or of a complex of motor skills

(sports games, combat sports, etc) (A. Dragnea,

1996). The expert use of strength exercises

helps to restore the effort capacity; the

alternation of the less involved muscle groups

and of muscle groups with maximum stress is a

condition of workouts effectiveness (A. Nicu,

1993).

Learning the techniques used in various

sport branches is generally characterized by thelaws and phases of motor skills and actions, of

course, with some differentiating, specific

notes, determined by the particularities of sport

branches. (A. Dragnea, 1996). The relations

between technical elements and technical

procedures are not present in al l branches ofsport, some of them having technical procedures


2/6



only (weightlifting) (A. Dragnea, S. Mate-

Teodorescu, 2002)

One of the major problems in

performance weightli ft ing re fers to athletes

gradual training for the execution of

competition exercises at snatch lift and cleanand jerk lift with a certain weight of the barbell,

when the athletes body status must be maximal.

The factor that ensures optimum conditions for

solving these problems is the rational sportstechnique (without breaking the regulations of

the competition), which helps the athlete to use

efficiently the physical, functional and

psychological tr aits when li ft ing the barbell

with maximum weight (L.S.Dvorkin, 2005).

Purpose of the paper: to determine thelevel of technical and specific physical training

in performance weightlifting.

HypothesisWe consider that an optimum

relationship of technical training and specific

physical training in performance weight lift ing

will contribute to the improvement of

performances achieved in competi tion.

Methods of research and procedures

The study was centered round the

training programs in order to test the level of

technical and specific physical training,monitoring statistically the evolution of

performance parameters . The stat is tical

processing was made in Word and KyPlot

programs, calculating the usual stat is ticalindices and the test of linear correlation.

Subjects, protocol of conduct

In order to emphasize the level of

technical and specific physical training during

the workouts of performance weightlifters, a

study was conducted within the WeightliftingOlympic Team. The study was carried out

throughout two annual cycles period (2008 -

2009), formed of macro-cycles, applied on agroup of 9 athletes, 18-24 years old, in juniors,

youth and seniors categories.

Results

Table 1. Results of specific physical training level

No. Control trial Initial

testing

Final Testing

t P

_

X m

_

X m

1 Back squats (max 1 rep) 220.58.84 237.29.24 6.86 P


3/6

THE ANNALS OF DUNAREA DE JOS UNIVERSITY OF GALATIFASCICLE XV ISSN14549832 - 2011

In table no. 2 are shown the results of

technical training level testing, evaluated by the

assessment of technical execution phases at

snatch and clean and jerk lifts, regarding the

arithmetical mean in initial and final testing and

the correlation of the differences between

means.

Table no. 3. Results of performances in 2008 competitions (initial testing)

No. Full name Competition Category Weight Snatch Clean &jerk

Total Ranking

Sn C&J Total

1 Buci A. Olympics 62 61.66 130 165 295 4

NC Seniors 62 61.98 121 146 267 2 2 2

2 Martin R. EC Seniors 69 67.82 125 155 280 20 17 19

Olympics 69 130 158 288 19

NC Seniors 69 68.74 130 163 293 2 2 2

WC Juniors 69 68.20 134 161 295 5 5 5

EC Juniors 69 68.75 135 167 302 4 2 2

3 Rou A. EC Seniors 69 69 137 170 307 8 6 6

Olympics 69 136 - - - - -

NC Seniors 77 76.72 141 180 321 1 1 14 Stoichi

P.EC Juniors 69 68.58 126 162 288 7 6 7

NC Seniors 69 68.99 127 161 288 3 3 3

5 Scrian

G.

European

Cup

85 79.91 132 172 304 1 1 1

NC Seniors 77 75.26 140 160 300 2 2 2

6 Rusu R. Olympics 77 140 170 310 18

NC Seniors 94 85.01 147 184 331 2 1 2

WC Juniors 85 82.88 140 173 313 10 11 9

EC Juniors 85 83.06 140 181 321 13 8 9

7 Olaru G. European

Cup

62 56.79 93 126 219 1 1 1

EC Juniors 56 56.6 93 126 219 6 3 6

NC Seniors 56 55.46 95 120 215 2 2 28 Danciu M. EC Juniors 85 83.76 141 173 314 11 10 11

NC Seniors 94 87.33 130 170 300 3 3 3

9 Gscan M. NC Seniors 56 55.92 97 130 227 1 1 1

X 72.25 70.6 127.5 159.6 286.8 5.2 4.35 5.86

Em 2.27 2.25 3.32 3.8 7.17 1.12 0.95 1.21

S 11.1 10.3 16.2 18.2 34.4 5.03 4.25 5.81

Cv 15.4 14.6 12.7 11.4 12.0 96.7 97.8 99.1

Table no. 4. Results of performances in 2009 competitions (final testing)

No. Full name Competition Category Weight Snatch Clean &Jerk

Total Ranking

Sn C&J Total

1 Buci A. EC Seniors 62 61.80 121 - - 6 - -

2 Martin R. WC Juniors 69 68.81 143 170 313 4 5 3EC Juniors 69 69 144 175 319 1 1 1

3 Rou A. EC Seniors 77 75.50 148 180 328 7 6 6

NC Seniors 77 76.96 143 176 319 2 1 2

EC Youth 77 76.10 142 173 315 8 7 8

4 Stoichi P. WC Juniors 69 68.62 135 170 305 6 4 5

EC Juniors 69 68.65 135 168 303 3 2 2

NC Seniors 69 69 125 170 295 1 1 1

EC Youth 69 68.65 130 171 301 6 3 5

5 Scrian G. EC Seniors 77 76.51 143 177 320 10 7 9

NC Seniors 85 82.52 - 172 - - 4 -

EC Youth 85 83.55 150 170 320 6 10 7

6 Rusu R. EC Seniors 85 82.54 150 188 338 17 12 16

NC Seniors 94 86.04 150 175 325 2 3 27 Olaru G. EC Seniors 56 55.67 100 131 231 10 6 8


4/6



NC Seniors 62 60.6 100 136 236 6 3 6

EC Youth 56 55.74 96 135 231 9 2 5

8 Danciu M. WC Juniors 85 84.70 156 175 331 5 12 8

NC Seniors 94 87.99 141 176 317 3 2 3

EC Youth 85 84.10 145 170 315 8 11 10

9 Gscan M. EC Seniors 56 55.79 95 129 224 13 9 9

NC Seniors 62 61.72 105 135 240 4 4 3

X 73.4 72.1 131.6 164.6 296.4 6.22 5.22 5.66

Em 2.42 2.17 4.23 3.84 8.31 0.84 0.76 0.8

S 11.6 10.4 19.8 18.01 38.1 3.95 3.61 3.69

Cv 15.8 14.4 15.09 10.9 12.8 63.4 69.08 65.1

In tables no. 3 and 4 are listed the

results of the performances achieved in local

and international competitions within 2008-

2009 annual training cycles, highlighting the

weight class, the athletes weight incompetition, his performances at the two lifts

and his ranking.

Figure no. 1 and no. 2 show the

dynamics of weightlifters sports performances

during 2008-2009 training period, exemplified

by the results of the athletes R.R, M.R., SP,

D.M. at snatch, clean and jerk and total.

163 161 167170

331

130 130 134135 143 144 Martin R

Smuls 125

158175 Martin RAruncat 155

295 302313

319 Martin R

293288Total 280

147 140140 150

Smuls 140150 Rusu R

188181173184

Aruncat 170

175 Rusu R

338321

313Total 310

325 Rusu R

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

CE Seniori

2008

JO 2008 CN Seniori

2008

CMJuniori

2008

CEJuniori 2008 CM Juniori

2009

CE Juniori

2009

kg

Figure no. 1. Dynamics of weightlifters sports performances achieved over 2008-2009 period

161170 170156

141

130 Stoichi PSmuls 126 127135 135 125

Aruncat 162

168 171 Stoichi P

305 303295 301 Stoichi P

288Total 288

145 Danciu MSmuls 141 130

170Aruncat 173 175

176

170 Danciu M

300

331317

315 Danciu MTotal 314

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

CE Juniori 2008 CN Seniori 2008 CM Juniori 2009 CE Juniori 2009 CN Seniori 2009 CE Tineret 2009

kg

Figure no. 2. Dynamics of weightlifters sports performances achieved over2008-2009 period


5/6



Conclusions

Increased level of specific physical training

in all control trials at final testing and significant

differences between averages of each trial.

Improved level of technical training of snatch

lift and clean and jerk lift execution phases andsignificant differences between averages of each

stage.

The dynamics of weightlifters sports

performances throughout the biannual training cycleemphasizes the relationship of weight classes and

body weight in the competition; improvement of

performances at snatch lift by 4.1kg, clean and jerk by

5kg and total by 9.6kg versus 2008 annual cycle and a

better evolution in the total of theses lifts.

In conclusion, we can confirm that theprovision of optimal relationships between specific

physical training and technical training in

performance weightlifting helps to improveperformances in competition.

References

1. Bompa, T., Periodization: Theory and Methodology ofTraining. Ex Ponto Publishing House, Bucharest, 2002(48).

2. Dragnea A., Sports Traini ng. Didactical and PedagogicalPublishing House, R.A. Bucharest, 1996, (136, 165).

3. Dragnea A., Mate- Teodorescu S., Theory of Sport. FESTPublishing House, Bucharest, 2002, (283).

4. Dvorkin L.S., Manual of Heavy Athletics. SovetskijSport Publishing House, Moscow, 2005, (220).

5. Nicu A., Modern Sports Traini ng. Editis PublishingHouse, Bucharest, 1993, (321).

Determinarea nivelului pregtirii fizice specifice i

tehnice n haltere de performanRezumat: Scopul lucrrii l constituie determinareanivelului pregtirii fizice specifice i tehnice nhaltere de performan. Pentru aceasta, amconsiderat c asigurarea unei relaii optime ntre

pregtirea fizic specific i pregtirea tehnic nhaltere de performan va contribui la mbuntirea

performanelor n concurs.n studiu au fost luate programele de pregtire nvederea testrii nivelului pregtirii fizice specifice itehnice, urmrindu-se statistic evoluia parametrilor

de performan. Prelucrrile statistice au fost fcuten programele Word i KyPlot, calculnd indiciistatistici uzuali i testul decorelare liniar. Pentru aevidenia nivelul pregtirii fizice specifice i tehnicen cadrul pregtirii halterofililor de performan,

s-a organizat un studiu n cadrul Lotului Olimpic dehaltere. Studiul s-a desfurat n perioada a doucicluri anuale (2008 - 2009), alctuit din 10macrocicluri, aplicate pe un grup de 9 sportivi, cuvrste cuprinse ntre 18-24 ani, la categoriile juniori,

tineret i seniori. Rezultatele studiului evideniaznivelul pregtirii fizice specifice i tehnice ahalterofililor aflai n studiu i dinamica

performanelor n cadrul ciclurilor de pregtire 2008-2009. n concluzie, putem confirma c asigurarea

unei relaii optime ntre pregtirea fizic specific ipregtirea tehnic n haltere de performancontribuie la mbuntirea performanelor nconcurs.Cuvinte cheie: haltere, pregtirea fizic, pregtireatehnic, probe de control, performan.

Dtermination du niveau de lentranement

physique spcifique et technique dans

lhaltrophilie de performanceRsum: Le but de cet ouvrage est de dterminer leniveau de la prparation physique spcifique ettechnique en haltrophilie de performance. Pour cela,

nous avons considr que la ralisation dunerelation optimale entre lentranement physiquespcifique et lentranement technique enhaltrophilie de performance va contribuer lamlioration des performances en concours.

Ltude a t axe sur les programmesdentranement visant tester le niveau de la

prparation physique spcifique et technique, enobservantde point de vue statistique lvolution des

paramtres de performance. Les traitements dedonnes statistiques ont t faits dans les programmesWord et KyPlot, en calculant les indices

statistiques usuels et le test de corrlation linaire.

Afin de mettre en vidence le niveau de lentranementphysique spcifique et technique dans la prparationdes haltrophiles de performance, on a organis unetude dans lquipe olympique dhaltrophilie.

Ltude a t mene au cours de deux cycles annuels(2008 - 2009), composs de 10 macro - cycles,appliqus un groupe de 9 athltes, gs de 18 24ans, dans les catgories juniors, jeunes et seniors.

Les rsultats de ltude mettent en vidence le niveaude lentranement physique spcifique et techniquedans la prparation des haltrophiles - sujets deltude et la dynamique des performances dans lescycles dentranement 2008-2009.

En conclusion, nous pouvons confirmer quunerelation optimale assure entre lentranement

physique spcifique et lentranement technique danslhaltrophilie de performance contribue lamlioration des performances en concours.Mots-cls: haltrophilie, entranement physique,entranement technique, preuves de contrle,

performance.


6/6

Copyright of Annals of the University Dunarea de Jos of Galati: Fascicle XV: Physical Education & Sport

Management is the property of Dunarea de Jos University of Galati and its content may not be copied or

emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission.

However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.

determining the level of technical and specific physical training in performance weightlifting

Documents