determination of igg- and igm-class antibodies to mumps virus by solid-phase enzyme immunoassay
TRANSCRIPT
Journal of Virological Methods, 4 (1982) 249- 251
Elsevier Biomedical Press
249
DETERMINATION OF IgG- AND Ighi-CLASS ANTIBODIES TO MUMPS VIRUS BY
SOLID-PHASE ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY
OLLI MEURMAN’,3, PENTTI HANNINEN’ , RANGACHAR V. KRISHNA3 and THEDI ZIEGLER’,”
1 Department of Virology, and ’ Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Turku, SF-20520
Turku 52, Finland; and 3 Institute of Medical Microbiology, CH- 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland
(Accepted 3 February 1982)
An indirect enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the determination of IgG and IgM antibodies to
mumps virus is described. Viral antigens and control antigens were adsorbed onto polystyrene micro-
titer plates, and antibodies attached to the antigens were detected by subsequent binding of com-
mercial peroxidase-labeled antibodies to the heavy chains of human IgG and IgM immunoglobulins.
A comparison of antibody titers obtained by the EIA and by indirect immunofluorescence test showed
a close concordance between these two tests, with EIA, however, being more sensitive. Occasional cross-
reactions between mumps and parainfluenza antibodies were detected in the IgG antibody test but
not in the IgM antibody test. In sera from 84 patients with mumps infection, all cases were diagnosed
by the EIA IgM antibody assay, 96% from the fist serum specimen. Mumps was diagnosed by comple-
ment fixation (CF) in 71% of these cases: unclear or erroneous results with parainfluenza titer in-
creases in 10% and no diagnosis in 18% of the cases. The EIA IgM antibody assay was thus better than
the CF test for the diagnosis of acute mumps infection.
indirect enzyme immunoassay IgG IgM mumps antibodies
INTRODUCTION
Although the diagnosis of mumps infection in typical cases of parotitis can usually
be made without laboratory tests, a rapid and reliable laboratory diagnosis is important
for the differential diagnosis of other manifestations of mumps infections, such as men-
ingoencephalitis, pancreatitis, or orchitis which often occur without any signs of paro-
titis.
The demonstration of specific IgM antibodies has been shown to be a practical method
for rapid diagnosis in several acute viral infections, including mumps (Nicolai-Scholten
et al., 1980; Ukkonen et al., 1980). In the present report we describe a simple indirect
microtiter plate enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the detection of IgG and IgM antibodies
to mumps virus. The EIA test was applied to the serological diagnosis of mumps virus
infections and compared with the complement fixation (CF) test with respect to sen-
sitivity and specificity.
0166-0934/82/0000-0000/$02.75 @ 1982 Elsevier Biomedical Press
250
MATERIALSANDMETHODS
Patients and sera The study material comprised the following groups: 1) 111 serum specimens from
healthy medical students; 2) paired serum specimens from 84 patients with clinically
typical mumps infection; 3) serial serum specimens from three patients with mumps
infection; 4) paired serum specimens from 10 patients with parainfluenza virus infection
verified by viral antigen detection by immunofluorescence (Gardner and McQuillin,
1980); 5) 22 serum specimens collected from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and
containing rheumatoid factor (RF).
Antigens Mumps virus (a wild strain isolated in this laboratory) was grown in African green
monkey kidney (Vero) cells. Eagle’s minimum essential medium (EMEM) without serum
was used as maintenance medium. When a cytopathic effect (CPE) was seen in 75% of
the cells, the cells were washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4, and
scraped into PBS. The cells were disrupted with ultrasonic treatment, crude cell debris
removed by low-speed centrifugation and the supernatant centrifuged for 2 h at 25,000
r.p.m. in a Beckman SW 27.1 rotor. The pellet was resuspended in PBS and used as anti-
gen in EIA. The optimal dilution of each antigen batch was determined by box titra-
tion with a known positive and a known negative serum. Control antigen was prepared
in a similar way from uninfected Vero cells and diluted to the same protein content as
the virus antigen. Antigen and control antigen were prepared in the same way from para-
influenza type 1 (Sendai) virus grown in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells
and from parainfluenza type 2 and 3 viruses grown in Vero cells.
EIA procedure The antigens and corresponding control antigens were diluted in PBS and 75 ~1 ah-
quots of the antigen suspension incubated in the wells of flat-bottom polystyrene micro-
titer plates overnight at room temperature. After incubation, the antigen suspensions
were aspirated off and the wells allowed to dry in air. The plates were stored at t4”C
and washed with PBS before use.
Seventy-five ~1 aliquots of test sera (four-fold dilutions starting at 1 : 40) were in-
cubated in the antigen and control antigen-coated wells for 2 h at 37°C. A positive and
a negative control serum were included on each plate. After washing with PBS contain-
ing 0.1% Tween 20, 75 /..d aliquots of a 1 : 500 dilution of peroxidase-conjugated swine
anti-human-IgG or -1gM (heavy chain-specific, Orion Diagnostica, Finland) were pipetted
into the wells and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. PBS containing 5% normal porcine serum
and 0.5% Tween 20 was used as diluent for both test sera and conjugated anti-human
immunoglobulins. After washing as before, 75 ~1 aliquots of freshly prepared substrate
(1,2_phenylenediamine, 1 mg/ml, with 0.03% hydrogen peroxide in citrate-phosphate
buffer, pH 5.5) were added. The microtiter plates were incubated in the dark for 30
251
min at room temperature and 150 ~1 aliquots of 4 M sulphuric acid were added to each
well to stop the reaction. The absorbances of the solutions in each well were measured
directly on the plate with a vertically measuring photometer (Titertek Multiskan, Eflab,
Finland) at 492 nm. The end-point titer was regarded as the highest serum dilution where
the absorbance in the virus antigen-coated well was 2.1 times that in the control antigen-
coated well with the proviso that the absorbance value in the virus antigen-coated well
should be at least 0.1.
Indirect immunofluorescence test Mumps virus was grown in Vero cells as mentioned above. At 75% CPE, the cells
were trypsinized into EMEM containing 10% calf serum, washed three times with cold
EMEM and resuspended in EMEM to obtain the optimal cell density for the indirect
immunofluorescence test. Ten ~1 of cell suspension were pipetted into each well of the
polystyrene immunofluorescence plates, the cells were allowed to dry in air and were
then fixed in absolute methanol for 10 min at 4°C. For the IgG antibody assay whole
sera were used while for the IgM antibody assay the sera were fractionated by column
chromatography on agarose and the IgM fractions collected (Pyndiah et al., 1977).
Serial dilutions of the test sera or of the IgM fractions were pipetted into the wells and
incubated for 30 min (IgG antibody assay) or for 3 h (IgM antibody assay) at 37°C.
After washing, the wells were incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-human-IgG or
-1gM (Dako, Denmark) for 30 min at 37°C. The highest dilution of serum or IgM frac-
tion showing clear intracytoplasmic fluorescence was taken as the end point-titer.
Measurement and removal of rheumatoid factor RF levels of the serum specimens were determined by EIA according to Ziola and
Tuokko (1980) and the results expressed as I.U./ml using an international reference
preparation.
Serum specimens were absorbed by incubation with latex particles coated with aggre-
gated human IgG (Vejtorp, 1980).
RESULTS
In both IgG and IgM antibody assays the negative and positive sera produced suffi-
ciently low absorbance values with the control antigen, especially at dilutions of 160
and higher (Fig. 1). Almost similar values were noted when negative sera were incubated
with mumps antigen, although it was a rather constant finding that the negative sera
also gave somewhat higher absorbance values with the mumps antigen than with the
control antigen. A serum which was mumps antibody-positive commonly gave 5-30
times higher absorbance values with the mumps antigen than with the control antigen.
The distribution of mumps IgG and IgM antibodies in sera of 111 healthy medical
students is shown in Table 1. None of the medical students had IgM antibodies to mumps.
IgG antibodies were found in 83% of the sera, whereas 17% of the young adults studied
had no antibodies at the serum dilution 1 : 40.
252
5 1. Y
1.1
0..
t
IgG 1.
.
\ l.l
.
2 4 6 8
.
\, .
‘CtM
Fig. 1. Representative results of mumps IgG (left panel) and IgM (right panel) antibody test obtained
when a positive and a negative serum were tested with mumps antigen and with control antigen-
coated plates. Positive serum, mumps antigen (0). Positive serum, control antigen (0). Negative serum,
mumps antigen (w). Negative serum, control antigen (0).
TABLE 1
Distribution of mumps IgG and IgM antibody titers in sera from 111 healthy medical students mea-
sured by EIA
Class of antibody Number of sera having a mumps EIA titer of
<40 40 80 160 320 640 1280 2560 5120
IgC 19 4 9 10 22 25 14 6 2
IgM 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
The sensitivity of the EIA test was compared to that of the indirect immunofluor-
escence test by parallel examination of 36 serum specimens from patients with acute or
remote mumps infection. The EIA titers obtained were about lo-30 times higher than
the immunofluorescence titers and some additional positives were obtained with EIA.
On the whole, a good agreement between these two tests was observed (Fig. 2).
Rheumatoid factor interference in the EIA IgM antibody assay was studied using 22
sera with variable amounts of RF. None of the mumps IgG antibody-negative sera gave
a false-positive IgM result, irrespective of the amount of RF present. When sufficient
amounts of both RF and mumps IgG antibody were present, false-positive IgM results
were observed. However, in most of the cases these IgM titers were very low and in only
two sera false-positive IgM titers comparable to those detected in acute mumps infections
253
. . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . ::
. . . . . .
:: . . .
~2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
EIA IgG titer (log,xlO)
. . . . . ::
. . . . . . .
. . . .
. . . . .
.‘f. . . . . . .
~2 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
EIA IgM titer (log,xlO)
Fig. 2. Comparison of mumps IgG antibody titers (upper panel) and IgM antibody titers (lower panel)
obtained by enzyme immunoassay (ISA) and by indirect immunofluorescence (IF) in 36 serum speci-
mens. For IgG antibody titers the linear regression T’ = 0.62, and for IgM antibody titers rZ = 0.75.
were obtained. The false-positive results could be avoided by absorption of RF with
aggregated human gamma-globulin (Table 2).
Among 10 patients with parainfluenza virus infection, one (with a type 2 infection)
TABLE 2
Representative results of rheumatoid factor (RF) interference in EIA for mumps IgM antibodies
Patient Mumps
Igc; titer
RF units (I.U./ml) Mumps IgM titer
Before After Before After
absorption absorption absorption absorption
1 < 40 184 NT < 40 NT
2 160 32 1.3 80 < 40
3 2560 30 0.5 320 < 40
4 640 59 2.2 160 < 40
5 2560 126 0.6 320 < 40
6 640 41 0.5 1280 < 40
1 640 553 5.5 1280 < 40
254
showed a significant IgG titer increase to mumps virus. None of the patients had IgM
antibodies to mumps virus.
The appearance and persistence of mumps antibodies were studied by testing serial
serum specimens from three patients with a natural mumps infection. IgM antibodies
reached a maximum level in about one week and started to decline within one month.
All patients still had low levels of IgM antibodies (titers 160-640) when they were
lost from the follow-up about 4 months after the onset of the disease. IgG antibodies
reached maximum levels in l--2 weeks and thereafter remained constant during the
period of study.
The present EIA test was compared with the CF test as a routine diagnostic tool by
testing paired serum specimens (taken 7-21 days apart) from 84 consecutive clinically
typical patients with mumps seen at the Department of Infectious Diseases, University
of Turku, between 1975 and 1977. A significant (four-fold or higher) increase in mumps
CF antibody titer was detected in 67 patients (80%) and, using the mumps EIA IgG anti-
body titer, in 50 patients (60%). If the acute-phase serum specimen was taken during days
O--6 after the onset of illness, the CF test detected increases in 90% and EIA IgG test
in 75% of the patients. Of the acute-phase specimens 32 were negative in the CF test
against only seven in the EIA IgG test. Mumps IgM antibodies were detected by EIA
in all 84 patients and in 81 cases in the first serum specimen examined. The three acute-
phase specimens which were IgM negative had been taken 2,2 and 7 days after the onset
of the disease, respectively.
In the CF test, seven patients with a signi~cant rise in titer to mumps virus there
were simultaneous CF titer increases to one or more parainfluenza viruses. Further-
more, two patients had CF titer increases to parainfluenza 2 virus but not to mumps
virus. All these nine patients had IgM antibodies to mumps. When eight of these patients
were tested for IgG and IgM antibodies to parainfluenza viruses by EIA, IgG antibody
titer increases to parainfluenza types 1, 2, and 3 were detected in 2, 6, and 3 cases, re-
spectively, whereas IgM antibodies to parainfluenza viruses were not detected (Table 3).
DISCUSSION
The serological diagnosis of mumps infections is based mostly on the demonstration
of a signi~cant titer increase between acute and convalescent phase serum specimens
by the CF test. The known disadvantages of this method are the requirement of paired
serum specimens which makes the diagnosis slow, the missing of titer increases by de-
lay in collecting the acute-phase specimen, and the cross-reactions between mumps
and parainfluenza viruses (Lennette et al., 1963). In our 84 patients, the CF test gave
a mumps diagnosis in 60 patients (71%) an unclear result with titer increases to both
mumps and parainfluenza viruses in seven patients (8%), an erroneous parainfluenza
diagnosis in two patients (2%) and no diagnosis at all in 15 patients (18%) the latter
being mostly cases where the acute-phase serum specimen was obtained during the
second week after the onset of illness or later.
255
TABLE 3
Mumps and parainfluenza virus CF and EIA IgG and IgMa antibody titers in paired serum specimens
from mumps patients with significant CT: titer increases to parainflucnza viruses
Patient Days Antibody titer
and
age tyr)
after Mumps Para 1 Para 2 Para 3
onset CF IgG LgM CF IgG CF IgG CF fgG
V.T. (8) 9 64 1280 5120
19 256 5120 20480
E.P. (11) 5 <4 1280 5120
15 64 5120 10240
S.T. (15) 9 16 5120 5120
21 64 5120 10240
A.T. (16) 2 32 640 2560
22 64 1280 2560
P.H. (17) 9 64 10240 20480
23 64 10240 20480
VS.-L. (27) 8 32 2560 2560
16 128 2560 5120
H.U. (40) 9 < 4 320 1280
21 32 1280 1280
E.V. (41) 5 < 4 1280 5120
15 64 5120 10240
<4 320 16 2560 16 1280
4 320 128 10240 16 2560
<4 160 4 80 16 10240
32 640 8 320 32 10240
4 320 16 5120 8 2560
16 1280 16 20480 16 5 120
<4 320 <4 2560 < 4 1280
<4 640 16 10240 < 4 2560
16 640 8 10240 16 5120
32 1280 32 20480 32 5120
4 1280 64 10240 64 5120
32 2560 256 40960 512 20480
16 320 <4 1280 16 2560
256 320 16 2560 256 10240
4 160 32 2560 < 4 5120
8 160 128 20480 4 20480
a IgM antibodies to parainfluenza viruses were negative and are not presented in the table.
The EIA IgG test was not superior to the CF test, since the more rapid appearance
of EIA IgG antibodies made it even more difficult to detect significant titer elevations
between acute and convalescent phase serum specimens. In addition, the EIA IgG anti-
body test was hampered by similar cross-reactions between mumps and parainfluenza
viruses as the CF test.
On the other hand, the EIA IgM antibody test gave a clear diagnosis of mumps in
all 84 patients, and in 81 patients (96%) from the first available serum specimen. Cross-
reactions between mumps and parainfluenza viruses seem not to interfere in the IgM
antibody assays, since neither mumps IgM antibodies in parainfluenza infections nor
parainfluenza IgM antibodies in mumps infections were detected. This is in agreement
with the results of Nicolai-Scholten et al. (1980) and of Ukkonen et al. (1980) who did
not observe false-positive mumps IgM antibody reactions in sera obtained from 23 and
12 patients with parainfluenza infections, respectively. Also, cases where the collection
of specimens has been delayed can be easily diagnosed since mumps IgM antibodies
persist for at least 3-4 months. This rather long persistence of IgM antibodies can, how-
ever, cause difficulties in the timing of the infection by means of the IgM antibody
titer, and careful attention must be paid to the clinical history of the patient, as pointed
out by Nicolai-Scholten et al. (1980).
IgM rheumatoid factor can cause false-positive IgM antibody results in indirect im-
munoassays, e.g. in rubella serology (Meurman and Ziola, 1978, Vejtorp, 1980). For the
diagnosis of mumps, however, this is usually not a serious problem since the patients
are mostly children and young adults without systemic disease and without detectable
RF activity. When false-positive results occur, the titers are mainly low and can be con-
trolled by re-testing after removal of the RF by absorption procedures.
The EIA IgG antibody assay, although not practical for the diagnosis of acute mumps
infections, has been shown to be a sensitive and reliable method for the determination
of mumps immunity (Leinikki et al., 1979). Although in some parainfluenza infections
antibodies which react in the mumps IgG assay are produced, these are mainly of low
titer and possibly transient in nature. The complete agreement between mumps EIA
IgG antibody assay and the neutralization test, reported by Leinikki et al. (1979), as
well as our finding of a lack of immunity to mumps in 17% of adults, although as a
result of childhood infections practically all adults have antibodies to at least one of the
parainfluenza viruses (La Placa and Moscovici, 1962) clearly speak against a serious
interference by parainfluenza antibodies in the mumps EIA IgG antibody assay.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The excellent technical assistance of MS Kaija Johansson is gratefully acknowledged.
This study was supported by a grant from the Emil Aaltonen Foundation, and from
the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, Finland.
REFERENCES
Gardner, P.S. and J. McQuilLin, 1980, Rapid Virus Diagnosis. Application of Immunofluoresence,
2nd ed. (Butterworths, London).
La Placa, M. and C. Moscovici, 1962, J. Immunol. 88, 72.
Leinikki, P., I. Shekarchi, N. Tzan, D.L. Madden and J.L. Sever, 1979, Proc. Sot. Exp. Biol. Med.
160, 363.
Lennette, E.H., F.W. Jensen, R.W. Guenther and R.L. Magoffin, 1963, J. Lab. Clin. Med. 61, 780.
Meurman, O.H. and B.R. Ziola, 1978, J. Clin. Pathol. 31,483.
Nicolai-Scholten, M.E., R. Ziegelmaier, F. Behrens and W. Hopken, 1980, Med. Microbial. Immunol.
168,81.
Pyndiah, N., P. Price, M. Jung, J. Wilhelm and U. Krech, 1977, Experientia 33, 1678.
Ukkonen, P., 0. Vaisanen and K. Penttinen, 1980, J. Clin. Microbial. 11, 319.
Vejtorp, M., 1980, J. Virol. Methods 1, 1.
Ziola, B. and H. Tuokko, 1980, Acta Pathol. Microbial. Stand. 88C, 127.