design for excellence pocketguide

244

Upload: szum

Post on 18-Dec-2015

79 views

Category:

Documents


10 download

DESCRIPTION

Pocket version of a design for excellence DMADV^2

TRANSCRIPT

  • Johnson & Johnson 2003

    A team of Design Excellence Subject Matter Expertswithin Johnson & Johnson, with support from out-side consultants, developed this Design Excellencepocket guide for exclusive use by Johnson & Johnsonassociates. These experts represented not only thedifferent company groups within Johnson & Johnson,but also different focus areas (product, process andservice design and development). I would like toacknowledge the passionate and dedicated efforts ofthese individuals and outside consultants indeveloping this pocket guide to enable and improvethe implementation of Design Excellence withinJohnson & Johnson:

    Kent Allen EES, DEx SME Team Leader2000-2002

    Bill Dean MD & DVanessa Evans CPCDoug Fraits PharmJohn Gilbert CPCJerry Mergen CP & NPatrick Murphy JJPE, World HeadquartersBarry Rhein JJPE, AssessmentFilip Vanhoutte Pharm

    Venky Gopalaswamy, Ph.DJJPE, Methodologies and DEx SME Team Leader

    Johnson & Johnson 2005

    A team of Design Excellence Subject Matter Expertswithin Johnson & Johnson, with support from out-side consultants, developed the Design Excellencepocket guide in 2003 for exclusive use by Johnson &Johnson associates. These experts represented notonly the different company groups within Johnson& Johnson, but also different focus areas (product,process and service development). In 2004, the DExcurriculum was revised with new and/or modifiedmaterials to reflect our latest thinking. This versionof the pocket guide reflects the changes to thecourse material. I would like to acknowledge thepassionate and dedicated efforts of these individualsand outside consultants in developing and improv-ing the DEx course material and this pocket guideto enable and improve successful implementation ofDesign Excellence at Johnson & Johnson.

    Gregg Alexander JJPRD, USAKen Creasy DePuy Codman, USATracy Flathmann JJPRD, USABarbara M. Hansen CPC, USACarl Lewis COIM, USAJeff Morris Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, USABarry Rhein JJPE, USAHelen Tai CPC, USAFilip Vanhoutte JJPRD, Belgium

    Venky Gopalaswamy, Ph.DJJPE, Methodologies and DEx SME Team Leader

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

  • Johnson & Johnson 2003 I

    Welcome to the Design Excellence (DEx) PocketGuide. This guide is designed to support youduring the implementation of DEx projects. Thispocket guide is not meant to replace training orguidance from Master Black Belts or SubjectMatter Experts. It is meant to supplement thesesources of information.

    DEx is a set of design tools and methodologies forimproving product/services/processes develop-ment to consistently provide reliable and manu-facturable products/services/processes thatconsistently meet customer requirements. Thisguide highlights key tools used in the phases of theDEx methodology. It is arranged in the phases ofthe methodology Define, Measure, Analyze,Design, Verify/Validate DMADV2. In the next fewpages, representations of the linkage between DExroadmap and New Product Development (NPD /Information System Development Life Cycle (SDLC)are provided. Please use the one that is applicable toyour project.

    Johnson & Johnson 2005

    Welcome to the Design Excellence (DEx) PocketGuide. This guide is designed to support you dur-ing the implementation of DEx projects and notmeant to replace training or guidance from MasterBlack Belts or Subject Matter Experts. It is meant tosupplement these primary sources of DEx subjectmatter expertise. Other supporting materials forDEx deployment include off-the-shelf software andelectronic tool templates, information for which isprovided with the course material.

    DEx is the disciplined application of tools andmethodologies used to design and develop prod-ucts, processes and services that consistently meetor exceed internal and external customer require-ments. This guide highlights key tools used in thephases of the DEx methodology. It is arranged inthe phases of the methodology Define, Measure,Analyze, Design, and Verify/Validate DMADV2.In the next few pages, representations of the linkagebetween DEx roadmap and New ProductDevelopment (NPD/Information SystemsDevelopment Life Cycle (SDLC) are provided. If anexisting NPD/SDLC roadmap in your companysupports your project please make sure you mapthe DEx tools to appropriate design phases.Otherwise, please use one of the applicableroadmaps in this pocket guide.

    INTRODUCTION

    I

    DEx Pocket Guide

  • Johnson & Johnson 2003II

    There are also two tables provided on pages XII-XVIII, one each for New Product Development(NPD) and Services and Processes (S&P). Thesetables include references to DEx tools and the DExphases where they are mostly applicable. Please notethat the linkages in these tables are provided only asreferences based on common practice. These linkagescan be different depending on the emphasis placedon specific tools within your operating company.

    As you move through project implementation, callon your Process Excellence (PE) leaders andMaster Black Belts for assistance and guidance.The PE leaders role is to ensure successfulidentification and completion of projects employ-ing the PE methodology. The role of the MasterBlack Belts is to coach and guide you with thecorrect use of tools and roadmaps to meet yourdeliverables.

    Johnson & Johnson 2005

    There are also two tables provided on pages XII-XVIII, one each for New Product Development(NPD) and Services and Processes (S&P). Thesetables include references to DEx tools and the DExphases where they are mostly applicable. Pleasenote that the linkages in these tables are providedonly as references based on common practice.These linkages can be different depending on theemphasis placed on specific tools within your oper-ating company.

    As you move through project implementation, callon your Process Excellence (PE) leaders and MasterBlack Belts for assistance and guidance. The PEleaders role is to ensure successful identificationand completion of projects employing the PEmethodology. The role of the Master Black Belts isto coach and guide you with the correct use of toolsand roadmaps to meet your deliverables.

    INTRODUCTION

    II

  • Johnson & Johnson 2003

    INTRODUCTION

    III

    CCCCoooonnnncccceeeepppptttt PPPPllllaaaannnnnnnniiiinnnngggg DDDDeeeevvvveeeellllooooppppmmmmeeeennnntttt PPPPrrrreeee----LLLLaaaauuuunnnncccchhhh &&&& SSSSccccaaaalllleeee----UUUUpppp PPPPoooosssstttt----LLLLaaaauuuunnnncccchhhh

    Representations of Design Excellence and NPD linkage in MD&D

    CCCCoooonnnncccceeeepppptttt FFFFeeeeaaaassssiiiibbbbiiiilllliiiittttyyyy DDDDeeeessssiiiiggggnnnn PPPPiiiillllooootttt MMMMffffgggg....IIIImmmmpppplllleeeemmmm....

    Strategy Feasibility DDDDeeeevvvveeeellllooooppppmmmmeeeennnntttt Implementation Base Business

    DDDDeeeeffffiiiinnnneeee MMMMeeeeaaaassssuuuurrrreeee

    AAAAnnnnaaaallllyyyyzzzzeeee DDDDeeeessssiiiiggggnnnn

    VVVVeeeerrrriiiiffffyyyy////VVVVaaaalllliiiiddddaaaatttteeee DDDDMMMMAAAAIIIIIIIICCCC

    DEx Charter MGP Gantt Chart SIPOC Market Research Value Proposition Affinity Diagram

    Market Research QFD Benchmarking Structure Tree Design Scorecards MSA/Gage R&R Process Capability Statistical Analysis Design for X

    Design Scorecards Brainstorming Functional Diagram Process Map FMEA Risk Analysis Reliability Analysis Pugh Matrix

    DOE/Simulations Design Scorecards Functional Diagram/

    Structure Tree Fault Tree/Reliability

    Analysis Tolerancing Robust Design MSA/Gage R&R QFD

    Control Charts Statistical Analysis

    Johnson & Johnson 2005 III

    INTRODUCTION

  • Johnson & Johnson 2003IV

    INTRODUCTION

    Global New Product Process (GNPP) + DEx

    Johnson & Johnson 2005IV

    INTRODUCTION

  • Johnson & Johnson 2003

    INTRODUCTION

    V Johnson & Johnson 2005 V

    INTRODUCTION

  • NNNN PPPPDDDD PPPP

    SSSS tttt aaaagggg eeee

    PPPP uuuurrrr pppp oooo

    ssss eeee

    Analyze a specific product/platform opportunity for its potential, strategic assessment, and preliminary financial attractiveness as efficiently as possi-ble

    Validate the refined business concept and business oppor-tunity against prior assumptions and to develop an initial project plan

    Design the product attributes, primary packaging and manu-facturing technology

    Develop a precommercialization product, process and package that delivers design requirements

    Finalize the commer-cial product, I. e., product, process, claims and indications

    Prepare the market, achieve approval of regulatory submission and validate the manufacturing proc-ess.

    Launch the product. Collect Lesson Learned

    Evaluate the per-formance of the NPDP for the indi-vidual project Monitor the in-market performance of the product on an ongoing basis

    OOOO bbbbjjjj eeee cccc t

    ttt iiii vvvv eeee ssss

    Complete an assumptionbased business opportunity

    Refine assumptionbased business proposition with metrics

    Update business proposition and pro-ject plan

    Updated challenge statements

    Develop design requirements

    Updated business proposition

    Updated challenge statements

    Updated project plan

    Confirmation of design require-ments

    Updated business proposition

    Updated challenge statements

    Updated project plan

    Confirmation of design require-ments

    Updated business proposition

    Updated challenge statements

    Updated project plan

    Confirmation of design require-ments

    Execute Launch

    Collect qualitative and quantitative lessons learned on NPDP for project

    Track in-market performance vs launch metrics (3, 6, 12 month/ Year 1, 2, 3)

    DDDD EEEExxxx

    KKKK eeeeyyyy TTTT

    oooo oooollll ssss a

    aaa nnnndddd MMMM

    eeee tttt hhhhoooo dddd

    Idea Generation & Evaluation

    Multi-Generational Plan

    Voice of Customer Charter Risk Management

    Voice of Customer Market Research Value Proposition Quality Function

    Deployment (House 1)

    Design Score-cards

    Financial Analysis Project Plan-

    ning/Management Metrics Analysis Metrics

    Dashboards Risk management Intellectual Prop-

    erty Packaging Con-

    cept Generation & Evaluation

    Intellectual Property Voice of Customer Quality Function

    Deployment Design Scorecards Critical Parameters Process Mapping Design for X

    (Cleaning) Risk Management Tolerance Design Statistical (Clinical)

    Planning & Analysis

    Statistical Analysis (Clinical)

    Process Mapping Design Scorecards

    and Critical Pa-rameters

    Design of Experi-ments

    Process Capability Analysis

    Measurement Sys-tem Analysis/Gage R&R

    Tolerance Design FMEA Design For Proc-

    essing & Packaging Lean Design Process Control

    Planning Vertical Startup

    Planning Supply Chain Business Qualifica-

    tion

    Marketing Planning Sales Planning Statistical Analysis Process Capability

    Analysis Process Control

    Planning Process Mapping Stability Analysis Verifica-

    tion/Validation Methods

    Design of Experi-ments

    Design Scorecards and Critical Pa-rameters

    Reliability Centered Maintenance

    Engineering Transfer

    Sales Launch Plan-ning

    Dashboards Process Control

    Planning Materials Manage-

    ment Planning Process Validation

    (PQ) Statistical Analysis Engineering

    Transfer

    Process Control Plans

    Master Batch Re-cord

    Statistical Process Control

    Process Improve-ment Strategy (DMAI2C)

    Process Capability Design Scorecards Operational Effi-

    ciency & Effective-ness (OEE)

    Process Control Plans

    Operational Effi-ciency & Effec-tiveness (OEE)

    Statistical Analysis Statistical Process

    Control Root Cause

    Analysis (DMAI2C) Process Im-

    provement Strat-egy (DMAI2C)

    DDDD EEEExxxx DDDDeeeeffffiiiinnnneeee MMMMeeeeaaaassssuuuurrrreeee AAAAnnnnaaaallllyyyyzzzzeeee DDDDeeeessssiiiiggggnnnn VVVVeeeerrrriiiiffffyyyy aaaannnndddd

    VVVVaaaalllliiiiddddaaaatttteeee DDDDMMMMAAAAIIII2222CCCC

    CCCCoooonnnncccceeeepppptttt BBBBuuuussssiiiinnnneeeessssssss FFFFeeeeaaaassssiiiibbbbiiii lllliiiittttyyyy

    SSSSttttaaaaggggeeee IIII DDDDeeeessssiiiiggggnnnn

    SSSSttttaaaaggggeeee IIIIIIII DDDDeeeevvvveeeellllooooppppmmmmeeeennnntttt

    SSSSttttaaaaggggeeee IIIIVVVV LLLLaaaauuuunnnncccchhhh RRRReeeeaaaadddd iiii----

    nnnneeeessssssss

    SSSSttttaaaaggggeeee VVVV LLLLaaaauuuunnnncccchhhh

    SSSSttttaaaaggggeeee VVVVIIII PPPPoooosssstttt LLLLaaaauuuunnnncccchhhh

    SSSSttttaaaaggggeeee IIIIIIIIIIII CCCCoooommmmmmmmeeeerrrrcccciiiiaaaalllliiiizzzz aaaa----

    ttttiiiioooonnnn

    MMMMccccNNNNeeeeiiiillll CCCCoooonnnnssssuuuummmmeeeerrrr aaaannnndddd SSSSppppeeeecccciiiiaaaallllttttyyyy PPPPhhhhaaaarrrrmmmmaaaacccceeeeuuuutttt iiiiccccaaaallllssss

    Johnson & Johnson 2003VI

    INTRODUCTION

    McNeil Consumer and Speciality Pharmaceuticals

    Stage IIICommercializa-

    tion

    Stage IVLaunch

    Readiness

    Johnson & Johnson 2005VI

    INTRODUCTION

  • Johnson & Johnson 2003

    INTRODUCTION

    VII Johnson & Johnson 2005 VII

    INTRODUCTION

  • Johnson & Johnson 2003

    INTRODUCTION

    VIII Johnson & Johnson 2005VIII

    INTRODUCTION

  • Johnson & Johnson 2005

    INTRODUCTION

    IX

    Overview of Phases of DEx

    I. DEFINE Projects

    II. MEASURE Requirements

    II.1 Gather VOC and Competitive Information

    II.2 From Needs to CTQs

    II.3 Design Scorecards

    Review of Measure Phase

    III. ANALYZE ConceptsIII.1 Concept Generation/SelectionIII.2 Concept FeasibilityIII.3 Do It By DesignReview of Analyze Phase

    IV. DESIGN in DetailIV.1 Work Out Detailed DesignsIV.2 Statistical DesignIV.3 Controlling the ProcessIV.4 PilotsReview of Design Phase

  • Johnson & Johnson 2005

    INTRODUCTION

    X

    V. VERIFY AND VALIDATE

    V.1 Plan and Conduct Verification & Validation

    Activities

    V.2 Evaluate Results: Iterate Design

    V.3 Scale Up and Launch

    Review of V&V Phase

  • Johnson & Johnson 2005

    INTRODUCTION

    XI

    WHICH METHODOLOGY BEST FITSYOUR NEEDS?

    Define

    Analyze

    Innovate/

    Improve

    Control

    De

    sig

    n E

    xcelle

    nce

    Six

    Sig

    ma

    Measure

    Does th

    e

    pro

    ce

    ss/

    se

    rvic

    e

    exis

    t?

    Yes

    No Measure

    Isin

    cre

    menta

    lim

    pro

    vem

    ent

    en

    oug

    h?Yes

    No

    Analyze

    Design

    Verify/

    Validate

    Transfer

  • Johnson & Johnson 2005

    INTRODUCTION

    XII

    emaNlooT

    retpahCrebmuN

    dnaegaP

    VDAMDDPNfoesahP 2 nitsomsiloothcihw

    ,enifeD(desuylnommoc,ngiseD,ezylanA,erusaeM

    )etadilaV&yfireVD M A D V2

    strahcwolfytivitcA 701/3 smargaidytiniffA

    suinehrrA 681/4

    gnikramhcneB 05/2 gnimrotsniarB 69/3

    sngisedetisopmoclartneC 861/4 retrahC 2/1

    nalpnoitacinummoC

    weivertpecnoC / sisylanatniojnoC 131/3

    )ytilauQotlacitirC(QTC 34/2 smargaidwolftnemyolpeD 801/3

    rofngiseDytilibarutcafunam

    148/4

    stnemirepxEfongiseD 158/4

    sweiverngiseD 02/1

    sdracerocsngiseD

    Effective team dynamics

    82/2

    8313

    2/38

    1/17

    1/3

    List of Tools Used in DEx for New ProductDevelopment

  • Johnson & Johnson 2005

    INTRODUCTION

    XIII

    emaNlooT

    retpahCrebmuN

    dnaegaP

    VDAMDDPNfoesahP 2 nitsomsiloothcihw

    ,enifeD(desuylnommoc,ngiseD,ezylanA,erusaeM

    )etadilaV&yfireVD M A D V2

    stsetdetacnurteruliaF 182/4sisylanaeerttluaF 123/3

    smargaidwolF 106/3 AEMF 118/3

    spuorgsucoF 33/2 sisylanalanoitcnuF 116/3

    strahCttnaG 13/1

    TLAH 182/4

    SSAH 182/4

    looTepocs-fo-tuo/nI 7/1

    sweivretnI 31/2

    sisylanaPI 86/2

    sisylanaonaK

    tseTsillaW-laksurK 351/3

    noitcnufssoL 73/2

    tseTyentihW-nnaM 351/3

    TSOEM 188/4

    2/40

  • Johnson & Johnson 2005

    INTRODUCTION

    XIV

    emaNlooT

    retpahCrebmuN

    dnaegaP

    VDAMDDPNfoesahP 2 nitsomsiloothcihw

    ,enifeD(desuylnommoc,ngiseD,ezylanA,erusaeM

    )etadilaV&yfireVD M A D V2

    nalPlanoitareneg-itluM 6/1 sngisederutxiM 741/4

    tsetnaidems'dooM 361/3 smargaidkrowteN 10/1

    strahcTREP 41/1 ekoy-akoP 152/4

    nalplortnocssecorP 192/4 ledomssecorP 112/3

    nalptcejorP 9/1 gnipytotorP 137/3 xirtamhguP 115/3

    DFQ 45/2 noitacilppadipaR

    )DAR(tnempoleved3/131

    stsetytilibaileR 182/4nwodwolfstnemeriuqeR 421/4

    tnemeganamksiR 171/3 MSR 601/4

  • Johnson & Johnson 2005

    INTRODUCTION

    XV

    emaNlooT

    retpahCrebmuN

    dnaegaP

    VDAMDDPNfoesahP 2 nitsomsiloothcihw

    ,enifeD(desuylnommoc,ngiseD,ezylanA,erusaeM

    )etadilaV&yfireVD M A D V2

    gnippamnoituloSStability testing

    98/3

    4/191

    sisylanaredlohekatS 15/1 syevruS 35/2

    stsocelcycefillatoT 129/3 ZIRT 100/3

    Value stream mapping 3/109

    COV 24/2 sisylanallubieW 183/4

    erutcurtsnwodkaerbkroW 11/1 801/4

    sisylanaesactsroW

  • Johnson & Johnson 2005

    INTRODUCTION

    XVI

    emaNlooT

    retpahCrebmuN

    dnaegaP

    VDAMDP&SfoesahP 2 nitsomsiloothcihw

    ,enifeD(desuylnommoc,ngiseD,ezylanA,erusaeM

    )etadilaV&yfireVD M A D V2

    strahCwolFytivitcA 071/3smargaiDytiniffA

    gnikramhcneB 2/50 gnimrotsniarB 96/3

    esaCssenisuB 2/1 nalPnoitacinummoC

    sisylanAtniojnoC 3/131strahClortnoC 194/4

    DiagramswolFtnemyolpeD 081/3 sweiveRngiseD 20/1

    sdracerocSngiseD 82/2

    2/38

    1/17

    sisylanAeerTtluaF 123/3 AEMF 181/3

    spuorGsucoF 33/2sisylanAlanoitcnuF 116/3

    13/1

    looTepocS-fo-tuO/nI 7/1

    Gantt Charts

    Effective Team Dynamics 1/3

    List of Tools Used in DEx for Service &Process Development

  • Johnson & Johnson 2005

    INTRODUCTION

    XVII

    emaNlooT

    retpahCrebmuN

    dnaegaP

    VDAMDP&SfoesahP 2 nitsomsiloothcihw

    ,enifeD(desuylnommoc,ngiseD,ezylanA,erusaeM

    )etadilaV&yfireVD M A D V2

    sweivretnI 31/2 sisylanAonaK

    tseTsillaW-laksurK 351/3 noitcnuFssoL 73/2 yentihW-nnaM 351/3

    tseTs'dooM 361/3 nalPlanoitareneG-itluM 6/1

    smargaiDkrowteN 1/10 smargaiDwolFytinutroppO 061/3

    strahCTREP 41/1 snalPlortnoCssecorP 192/4

    retrahCtcejorP 2/1 nalPtcejorP 9/1

    gnipytotorP 137/3 xirtaMhguP 115/3 )QOH(DFQ 45/2

    stseTytilibaileR 182/4

    2/40

  • Johnson & Johnson 2005

    INTRODUCTION

    XVIII

    emaNlooT

    retpahCrebmuN

    dnaegaP

    VDAMDP&SfoesahP 2 nitsomsiloothcihw

    ,enifeD(desuylnommoc,ngiseD,ezylanA,erusaeM

    )etadilaV&yfireVD M A D V2

    sisylanaredlohekatS 15/1 syevruS 35/2

    stsocelcycefillatoT 129/3

    COV 24/2 sisylanallubieW 183/4

    erutcurtsnwodkaerbkroW 1/11

    Value stream mapping 3/109

  • 1 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    I. DEFINE Projects

    Introduction

    The main purpose of the DEFINE phase is to definethe project and the opportunity. This phase is wheremanagement and the team define the objectives,allocate and secure resources (people, money, andequipment), creates a multi-generational plan, devel-ops a project plan based on the scope, and assigns rolesand responsibilities. During the DEFINE phase, theteam also identifies stakeholders, evaluates theirsupport levels, and develops strategies to improvesupport as well as creating a communication plan.When the DEFINE phase activities are not done (or notdone well), the team may find themselves failing tomeet objectives later in the project and will ultimatelyrevisit this phase. This causes time delays, disillu-sioned teams, and generally threatens a projectsviability.

  • 2 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    CharterThe charter is a contract between the organizationsleadership and the team. Its purpose is: To clarify what is expected of the team To keep the team aligned with organizational

    priorities To transfer the project from the champion to

    the team To secure/commit team members and their

    time

    Elements of the charter: Goal Statement Process & Project Scope Business Case Opportunity Statement Project Plan Team Selection

    The Goal Statement defines the deliverables of theproject, but does not specifically describe theproduct/service/process that is yet to be developed.

    The Process & Project Scope defines the boundariesof the project. Two tools for defining scope for DExprojects are: the In/Out-of-Scope Tool and Multi-Generational Plan (MGP).

    The Business Case describes the benefit to thebusiness for undertaking this project. It connects theproject to key business strategies.

  • 3 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    The Opportunity Statement describes the benefitto the customers, or the value added, that the newproduct/service/process will deliver. This can be adescription of problems or challenges that customershave which could be addressed by a new product/service/process. Often key market or customersegments are described here.

    The Project Plan specifies the milestones and datesfor the steps and activities in the project. Sinceprojects can be complex, more attention is given toproject planning for these projects than is usuallynecessary for sigma improvement projects.

    The Team Selection describes team roles andresponsibilities. It is expected that the team and theteam members stay committed for the duration ofthe project.

    Effective Team DynamicsA team is a group of people who are interdependentworking on a common goal. Teams are differentthan work groups because members are interdepen-dent on one another for task accomplishment. Ateam typically:

    1. has a specific business reason, objective, orpurpose for working together

    2. needs each others expertise, ability, coopera-tion, and commitment to obtain mutual goals

  • 4 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    3. believes that working as a group leads to moreeffective output than working alone

    4. is accountable for results in a larger organiza-tional context

    Following are the characteristics of effective teams: Common Purpose Clear Roles and Responsibilities Appropriate Procedures and Processes Open Communication Active Listening Broad Participation and Contribution Shared Leadership Informal, Relaxed Atmosphere Supportive, Cooperative Relationships Confidence, Cohesion and Trust Diversity and Disagreement Valued Consensus Decision Making Planning and Coordination Follow Up and Ongoing Evaluation

    There are many tools available to a team to ensurethat they perform effectively. Two of the key oneswill be highlighted in this section.

    Personal Shield: During the early stages of teamformation, personal shield tool is used to effectivelyidentify and manage needs of all the individuals onthe team.

  • 5 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    Responsibility (RACI) Chart: When the team isgoing through the storming phase, primary attentionshifts from what the team should do to how it shouldbe done. Team members can fight for control, andmany attempts are made to gain influence. Some orall of the team challenges the leader, either overtly orcovertly. To manage the situation better, it isimportant to define responsibilities using tools suchas RACI chart.

    Name:

    Unique Skills: What I Need To BeSuccessful Here:

    My Leadership Credo:

    Something you don'tknow about me:

    DevelopmentNeeds:

  • 6 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    1noitareneG 2noitareneG 3noitareneG

    noisiV

    /tcudorPnoitareneGecivreS

    /seigolonhceTsmroftalP

    Multi-Generation Plan (MGP)The MGP helps communicate the step-wise fashionthe business expects to deliver the ultimate vision.

    A series of releases/transitions which includes: A long-term vision for the desired state,

    product, service, or process A series of generations, with short-term

    results, moving toward that ultimate vision

    Vision Long-term direction for the product orservice based on anticipated evolution of customerneeds and competitor services beyond currentapplications.

    Product/Service Generation Series of service/process releases; each release characterized bydistinct combinations of features or technology(At least three generations planned).

    Technologies/Platforms Service/process competen-cies which can be leveraged to introduce a numberof generations quickly, and to reduce cost of newservice/process development. Ability to executethe MGP with current technology and identificationof needed technological developments includingplatforms for each generation.

  • 7 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    In-and-Out-of-Scope ToolOnce the first generation has been described, it isoften useful to further define what is within thescope of the first generation project. The In-and-Out-of-Scope Tool can help this work.

    Often the team and sponsor will have severaldiscussions about project scope. Using the In-and-Out-of-Scope Tool can help both the team andsponsor be clear about the boundaries of the firstgeneration product/service or process.

    Brainstorm elements of the projectWrite each element on a self-stick note Draw a circle on a flipchart to indicate

    project boundaries Place the notes either inside or outside

    the circles boundaries to show whetherthe element is within the teams scopeor not

    Review with the sponsor

  • 8 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    New functionality

    Redefine jobs

    Use current technology

    New IS platform

    US vs. Metric

    Adding personnel

    IN SCOPE

    IN-AND-OUT-OF-SCOPE

  • 9 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    Project Planning ToolsProject plans often start with identifying keymilestones. Milestones represent important decision

    points. The whole team should participate in de-

    fining and establishing dates for milestones.There should be about 10-15 milestones.

    Once milestones are defined, group theminto logical sequences.

    Use tools such as GANTT Charts, ProgramEvaluation and Review Technique (PERT)Charts, or Network Diagrams to show therelationship between milestones.

    In order to estimate the target date for each mile-stone, the team needs to: Estimate the tasks needed to reach each

    milestone. Estimate the actual work time required for

    each task. Estimate the resources available for each task. Take into account factors such as vacations,

    personal time off, overtime required, learningcurve, meetings, and time for consensus.

    Understand the relationships between thetasks needed to accomplish each milestone.

    Use the above information to determine total dur-ation time for each task and the overall projecttimeline.

  • 10 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    B2

    B1

    B4

    B3

    A2

    A1

    C1

    C2

    C3

    PROJECT START

    PROJECTOBJECTIVE

    ResultPath

    A

    ResultPath

    C

    ResultPath

    B

    Network DiagramsNetwork Diagrams can be useful in helping the teamvisualize the relationships between milestones.

  • 11 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    Work Breakdown StructureTo help map out detailed tasks, an activity schedulershould be used and take into consideration activitiessuch as: Work activities Control activities Commitment activities Communication activities Evaluation activities

  • 12 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    ACTIVITY SCHEDULE

    Lege

    nd:

    Actu

    al c

    ompl

    etio

    n da

    teS

    ched

    uled

    com

    plet

    ion

    date

    Ac

    tiv

    ity

    Sc

    he

    du

    leN

    amed

    Fun

    ctio

    ns/N

    amed

    Per

    sons

    Pro

    ject

    : Jad

    eM

    ilest

    one

    No.

    /Nam

    e: 5

    T4

    5V4

    Cha

    rt Is

    sue

    s/D

    ate

    : A-1

    App

    rove

    d by

    : TH

    Per

    iod

    Leng

    th: T

    wo

    Day

    sT

    arge

    t Com

    ple

    tion:

    30

    Jun

    X

    Exec

    utes

    the

    wor

    k

    D

    Take

    s de

    cisi

    on s

    olel

    yd

    Ta

    kes

    deci

    sion

    join

    tlyP

    M

    anag

    es p

    rogr

    ess

    T

    Pro

    vide

    s tra

    inin

    g on

    the

    job

    C

    Mus

    t be

    cons

    ulte

    dI

    M

    ust b

    e in

    form

    edA

    Av

    aila

    ble

    to a

    dvis

    e

    Wor

    k C

    ont

    Per

    iod

    Per

    iod

    No.

    Act

    ivity

    / Tas

    k N

    am

    e

    Leonard

    Brian

    Angela

    David

    Yolanda

    Cla

    rify

    Ope

    ratio

    ns

    Des

    crib

    e S

    yste

    m J

    ade

    I

    Des

    crib

    e S

    yste

    m J

    ade

    II

    Des

    crib

    e S

    yste

    m J

    ade

    III

    Tra

    nsla

    te E

    nglis

    h/N

    orw

    egia

    n

    Iden

    tify

    Sys

    . Fur

    ies

    I

    Qua

    ntify

    Res

    . Fur

    ies

    I

    Iden

    tify

    Sys

    . Co

    mpa

    ss I

    Qua

    ntify

    Res

    . Co

    mpa

    ss I

    6 4 2 2 2 4 1 4 1

    x

    xC

    CC

    TC

    xC

    C

    TC

    xC

    C

    Cx

    Tx

    C

    x

    Tx

    C

    x

    1920

    2122

    23/4

    30/4

    7/5

    14/5

    21/5

    28/5

    Frank

    George

    Alan

    Lisa

    Ac

    tiv

    ity

    Sc

    he

    du

    leN

    amed

    Fun

    ctio

    ns/N

    amed

    Per

    sons

    Pro

    ject

    : Jad

    eM

    ilest

    one

    No.

    /Nam

    e: 5

    T4

    5V4

    Cha

    rt Is

    sue

    s/D

    ate

    : A-1

    AP

    RA

    ppro

    ved

    by: T

    H

    Per

    iod

    Leng

    th: T

    wo

    Day

    sT

    arge

    t Com

    ple

    tion:

    30

    Jun

    X

    Exec

    utes

    the

    wor

    k

    D

    Take

    s de

    cisi

    on s

    olel

    yd

    Ta

    kes

    deci

    sion

    join

    tlyP

    M

    anag

    es p

    rogr

    ess

    T

    Pro

    vide

    s tra

    inin

    g on

    the

    job

    C

    Mus

    t be

    cons

    ulte

    dI

    M

    ust b

    e in

    form

    edA

    Av

    aila

    ble

    to a

    dvis

    e

    Wor

    k C

    ont

    No.

    Leonard

    Brian

    Angela

    David

    Yolanda

    Cla

    rify

    Ope

    ratio

    ns

    Des

    crib

    e S

    yste

    m J

    ade

    I

    Des

    crib

    e S

    yste

    m J

    ade

    II

    Des

    crib

    e S

    yste

    m J

    ade

    III

    Tra

    nsla

    te E

    nglis

    h/N

    orw

    egia

    n

    Iden

    tify

    Sys

    . Fur

    ies

    I

    Qua

    ntify

    Res

    . Fur

    ies

    I

    Iden

    tify

    Sys

    . Co

    mpa

    ss I

    Qua

    ntify

    Res

    . Co

    mpa

    ss I

    6 4 2 2 2 4 1 4 1

    x

    xC

    CC

    TC

    xC

    C

    TC

    xC

    C

    Cx

    Tx

    C

    x

    Tx

    C

    x

    1920

    2122

    Frank

    George

    Alan

    Lisa

    Lege

    nd:

    Actu

    al c

    ompl

    etio

    n da

    teS

    ched

    uled

    com

    plet

    ion

    date

    Ac

    tiv

    ity

    Sc

    he

    du

    leN

    amed

    Fun

    ctio

    ns/N

    amed

    Per

    sons

    Pro

    ject

    : Jad

    eM

    ilest

    one

    No.

    /Nam

    e: 5

    T4

    5V4

    Cha

    rt Is

    sue

    s/D

    ate

    : A-1

    App

    rove

    d by

    : TH

    Per

    iod

    Leng

    th: T

    wo

    Day

    sT

    arge

    t Com

    ple

    tion:

    30

    Jun

    X

    Exec

    utes

    the

    wor

    k

    D

    Take

    s de

    cisi

    on s

    olel

    yd

    Ta

    kes

    deci

    sion

    join

    tlyP

    M

    anag

    es p

    rogr

    ess

    T

    Pro

    vide

    s tra

    inin

    g on

    the

    job

    C

    Mus

    t be

    cons

    ulte

    dI

    M

    ust b

    e in

    form

    edA

    Av

    aila

    ble

    to a

    dvis

    e

    Wor

    k C

    ont

    Per

    iod

    Per

    iod

    No.

    Act

    ivity

    / Tas

    k N

    am

    e

    Leonard

    Brian

    Angela

    David

    Yolanda

    Cla

    rify

    Ope

    ratio

    ns

    Des

    crib

    e S

    yste

    m J

    ade

    I

    Des

    crib

    e S

    yste

    m J

    ade

    II

    Des

    crib

    e S

    yste

    m J

    ade

    III

    Tra

    nsla

    te E

    nglis

    h/N

    orw

    egia

    n

    Iden

    tify

    Sys

    . Fur

    ies

    I

    Qua

    ntify

    Res

    . Fur

    ies

    I

    Iden

    tify

    Sys

    . Co

    mpa

    ss I

    Qua

    ntify

    Res

    . Co

    mpa

    ss I

    6 4 2 2 2 4 1 4 1

    x

    xC

    CC

    TC

    xC

    C

    TC

    xC

    C

    Cx

    Tx

    C

    x

    Tx

    C

    x

    1920

    2122

    23/4

    30/4

    7/5

    14/5

    21/5

    28/5

    Frank

    George

    Alan

    Lisa

    Ac

    tiv

    ity

    Sc

    he

    du

    leN

    amed

    Fun

    ctio

    ns/N

    amed

    Per

    sons

    Pro

    ject

    : Jad

    eM

    ilest

    one

    No.

    /Nam

    e: 5

    T4

    5V4

    Cha

    rt Is

    sue

    s/D

    ate

    : A-1

    AP

    RA

    ppro

    ved

    by: T

    H

    Per

    iod

    Leng

    th: T

    wo

    Day

    sT

    arge

    t Com

    ple

    tion:

    30

    Jun

    X

    Exec

    utes

    the

    wor

    k

    D

    Take

    s de

    cisi

    on s

    olel

    yd

    Ta

    kes

    deci

    sion

    join

    tlyP

    M

    anag

    es p

    rogr

    ess

    T

    Pro

    vide

    s tra

    inin

    g on

    the

    job

    C

    Mus

    t be

    cons

    ulte

    dI

    M

    ust b

    e in

    form

    edA

    Av

    aila

    ble

    to a

    dvis

    e

    Wor

    k C

    ont

    No.

    Leonard

    Brian

    Angela

    David

    Yolanda

    Cla

    rify

    Ope

    ratio

    ns

    Des

    crib

    e S

    yste

    m J

    ade

    I

    Des

    crib

    e S

    yste

    m J

    ade

    II

    Des

    crib

    e S

    yste

    m J

    ade

    III

    Tra

    nsla

    te E

    nglis

    h/N

    orw

    egia

    n

    Iden

    tify

    Sys

    . Fur

    ies

    I

    Qua

    ntify

    Res

    . Fur

    ies

    I

    Iden

    tify

    Sys

    . Co

    mpa

    ss I

    Qua

    ntify

    Res

    . Co

    mpa

    ss I

    6 4 2 2 2 4 1 4 1

    x

    xC

    CC

    TC

    xC

    C

    TC

    xC

    C

    Cx

    Tx

    C

    x

    Tx

    C

    x

    1920

    2122

    Frank

    George

    Alan

    Lisa

    Frank

    George

    Alan

    Lisa

  • 13 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    GANTT ChartsGANTT Charts are useful in summarizing the flowof tasks across a timeline. Like the PERT chart, thesequencing of tasks is identified.

    emaN

    0002,4rt

    Q1002,1

    rtQ

    1002,2rt

    QQ

    peStc

    OvoN

    ceDnaJ

    beFra

    MrpA

    yaM

    nuJluJ

    sremots

    sde

    s'Q

    stpecnoCpol w

    -hgiHpol

    ngiseDleve

    7weiveR

    ngiseD

    8sliateD

    poleveD

    9noitalu

    miS

    01sisylanAtsoC

    11weiveR

    ngiseD

    tnemer

    noitatnem

  • 14 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    PERT ChartsPERT Charts display tasks and task dependenciesas a flowchart. A box (sometimes called a node)represents each task and a line connecting twoboxes represents the dependency between thetwo tasks. This tool helps to identify the sequenceor parallel tasks.

    Proj

    ect

    Star

    tID

    C

    usto

    mer

    sID

    Nee

    dsD

    evel

    op

    CTQ

    sD

    evel

    op

    Con

    cept

    sR

    evie

    wD

    evel

    op

    Hig

    h Le

    vel

    Des

    ign

    Des

    ign

    Rev

    iew

    Impl

    emen

    tatio

    n

    Proc

    urem

    ent

    Dev

    elop

    Det

    ails

    Des

    ign

    Rev

    iew

    Sim

    ulat

    ion

    Cos

    t Ana

    lysi

    s

  • 15 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    Stakeholder AnalysisStakeholder analysis is the proactive process ofidentifying, understanding, supporting and influenc-ing key individuals or groups to increase theirreadiness to carry out organizational initiatives and,thus, to facilitate the ultimate success of theseinitiatives.

    Stakeholder analysis is important because it canhelp: Gain buy-in and consensus required to make

    implementation of improvement initiativessuccessful;

    Establish sponsorship and support networks,and then leverage these as solutions areimplemented;

    Lay the groundwork, if done early enough inthe project life cycle, for managing inevitableresistance encountered during implementa-tion;

    Minimize the impact of resistance by prepar-ing key stakeholders;

    Understand the communication needs (email,voicemail, meeting involvement, one-on-oneupdates, etc.) of each stakeholder and developa communication plan (including frequency ofupdates) to ensure each stakeholder is gettingthe right amount of information during theproject.

  • 16 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    Steps:1. Plot where individuals currently are with

    regard to desired change (y = current).2. Plot where individuals need to be (X = desired)

    in order to successfully accomplish desiredchange identify gaps between current anddesired.

    3. Indicate how individuals are linked to eachother, draw lines to indicate an influence linkusing an arrow ( ) to indicate who influenceswhom.

    4. Plan action steps for closing gaps.

    semaN ylgnotS tsniagAyletaredoM

    tsniagA lartueNyletaredoMevitroppuS

    ylgnortSevitroppuS

    EXAMPLE OF STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS

  • 17 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    Communication PlanA communication strategy or plan is a proactiveprocess of identifying, planning and deliveringstrategic communications designed to address theunique information needs of different audiences(stakeholders). It is another means of buildingcommitment to change by increasing awareness andproviding relevant information.

    The stakeholder analysis and communication plansare iterative processes to be refined throughout theproject life.

  • 18 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    Project Risk

    It is important to manage potential risksduring the project

    At the end of each step, plan time to assesspotential risks to the projects success:

    Identify potential problems

    Determine the likelihood of theiroccurrence

    Take steps to avoid or deal with the likelyproblems

    Yellow light:Proceed withcaution

    Red light:Address beforeproceeding

    Red light:Do not Proceed

    Red light:Reassessproject

    Green light

    Low

    M

    edi

    um

    H

    igh

    Pro

    babi

    lity

    of O

    ccu

    rren

    ce

    Impact on Project

    Yellow light:Proceed withcaution

    Yellow light:Proceed withcaution

    Yellow light:Proceed withcaution

    Red light:Address beforeproceeding

  • 19 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    Review of Define Phase

    At the end of the DEFINE Phase, the following arein place: Properly chartered project and business case Plan for next generation products/process/

    technology platforms Project plans Project risks are identified, assessed, and

    addressed Stakeholders are clearly defined and priori-

    tized

    Deliverables for the DEFINE Phase include: Aligned team project charter Multi-generational plan Project milestone plan Project risk assessment plus mitigation plan Stakeholder assessment and communication

    plan Project risk analysis

  • 20 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    Design ReviewThe organization and independent reviewerscheck and agree that Product/Service, Process,and Supply chain are ready for rollout. The reviewteam agrees on the Launch strategy. Where app-licable within Johnson & Johnson, a decision aboutreadiness to file to regulatory bodies must also bemade. Typically, while the regulatory authoritiesreview the file, the product/service/process teamgets ready for launch.

    Design ReviewsA design review is a process for objectivelyevaluating the quality of a design at variousstages of the design process.

    It provides the opportunity for voices external tothe design team, including customers, to providefeedback on the design, as the product and serviceis being developed.

    A well-conducted design review helps to ensurethat the design will satisfy customers, and that thedesign process will function effectively to producea high quality product or service. Design Reviewsshould focus on both effectiveness and efficiencyof the design process. This will ensure that cust-omer requirements are well addressed withoutleading to any potential cost-related conflicts.

  • 21 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    Formal design reviews: These are reviews forwhich companies have well-established proce-dures that are part of the project plan for everyproject. They involve external (to the organization,company, or design team depending on thecircumstances) feedback, the results of which areconsistently and systematically reported in thedesign documentation.

    Informal design reviews: These are typicallyinternal reviews conducted regularly or as neededto ensure that the project is on target and toresolve specific technical and coordination issues.

    Design reviews need to be conducted at eachstage of the design process. The rule of thumb is toorganize a design review whenever externalfeedback appears appropriate or when there arecoordination issues. (Also, the design reviewprocess is cyclic, and multiple design reviews maybe needed at each stage of the design process.)

  • 22 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER ONE DEFINE

    This page intentionally left blank.

  • 23 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    II. MEASURE Requirements

    Introduction

    The MEASURE Phase includes: Identifying quantified requirements to provide

    the team the goals they will shoot for toproduce a competitive product, service, orprocess.

    Identifying Critical-to-Quality Requirements(CTQs) that are most important to achieve inthe design.

    Ensuring these requirements are linked tocustomer needs and in tune with the competi-tive environment.

    Creating scorecards to ensure that CTQs areattained during further development.

  • 24 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    II.1 Gather Voice of the Customer (VOC)and Competitive Information

    Voice of the CustomerVoice of the customer, the foundation for projectssuccess, is used to identify and quantify customers needsand their perception of your product or service. TheVOC is critical to an organization to identify andquantify:

    Which products and services to offer Critical features and specifications for products

    and services Baseline measures of customer satisfaction Key drivers of customer satisfaction

    IDENTIFYING CUSTOMERS Identify external and internal customers (SIPOC) Customers should be segmented or grouped

    according to their similar needs for products/services/processes

    Businesses should focus products/services/processes on the customer segment(s) they havechosen to achieve their business strategies

    Businesses should choose their customer segmentsbased upon the businesses capability to serveexisting customer needs profitably today, tomor-row, and in the future, as well as upon the busi-nesses ability to develop the capability to servepotential/new customer needs

  • 25 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    1.Identify

    customersand

    determinewhat you

    need to know

    2.Collect and

    analyzereactive

    system datathen fill gaps

    with proactive

    approaches

    3.Analyzedata to

    generate akey list ofcustomerneeds in

    theirlanguage

    Often a design team will focus only on the ulti-mate customer of the process or service. Somebroader customer groups to consider include:

    Government Regulatory agencies Internal departments Intermediary external customers

    The design teams composition should includerepresentatives (or permanent members or guests) ofinternal departments who are stakeholders (e.g.,human resources, legal, etc.).

  • 26 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    Economic Frequency Size of Customer Cost Revenue

    Descriptive Geographic Demographic Service Feature Channel

    Attitudinal Price Value Service

    WAYS TO SEGMENT CUSTOMERS

    Co-op Other

    FranchiseF

    elyPrivateheld

    Publiclyubliclyheld

    Soleproprietor

    REVENUE

    Num

    ber o

    f Cus

    tom

    ers

    Month

    Price

    Service

    PRICE & SERVICE

  • 27 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    1.Identify

    customersand

    determinewhat you

    need to know

    2.Collect and

    analyzereactive

    system datathen fill gaps

    with proactive

    approaches

    3.Analyzedata to

    generate akey list ofcustomerneeds in

    theirlanguage

    Your process or service is viewed by the customerfrom many different angles.

    There are two basic types of VOC systems, ReactiveSystems (Information comes to you whether you takeaction or notinitiated by customer in the form ofcomplaints, returns, sales, etc.) and ProactiveSystems (You need to put effort into gathering theinformationinitiated by the business in form ofcustomer surveys and market research).

    Existing or readily available customer information isoften mistakenly overlooked. We have a responsibil-ity to our customers to first understand, analyze andact on the information they have already beenproviding before we solicit more information fromthem. This existing information is often called aReactive VOC since it comes unsolicited from the

  • 28 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    customer. By studying the reactive data along withalready existing research we can optimize our timewith the customer.

    Consider these components or dimensions ofquality in planning the type of customer informa-tion you will need to gather as part of customerresearch.

    Additional sources of relevant customer/industryinformation are likely available. Some possibleinformation you may have can be found on the nextpage.

    QUALITYFocus on the benefits, functions/useprovided by the product/service/process

    COSTFocus on how much the benefits costthe customer

    DELIVERYFocus on the timeliness or quantity of the benefits

    SERVICE/SAFETY

    Focus on after sales service, notinjuring the customer

    CORPORATERESPONSIBILITY

    Focus on legal, regulatory, orenvironmental needs

  • 29 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    lo

    oTg

    ninetsiL

    noita

    mrof

    nIfo

    epyT:

    otg

    ninetsiL

    rof

    elbatiuS

    evitatilauQ

    evitatitna

    uQsla

    udividnI

    pu

    orGlla

    mSp

    uor

    GegraL

    )R(gnir

    otino

    Mr

    etneC

    ecivr

    eS/retn

    eCllaCX

    X)R(

    stcatnoClausaC

    XX

    )P(tne

    merus

    eMtni

    ojnoC

    XX

    X)R(

    sw

    ohSedarT

    dnasn

    oitne

    vnoC

    XX

    X)R(

    noitaula

    vEtnedicnIlacitirC

    XX

    X)P(

    slenaP

    re

    motsuC

    XX

    X)R(tiduA

    ecivr

    eSr

    em

    otsuCX

    X)P(

    spuor

    Gsuc

    oFX

    X)R(

    gnirotin

    oM

    noitacinu

    mm

    oCdnu

    obnIX

    X)P(

    hcraes

    eRe

    vitcaretnI

    XX

    X)P(

    sw

    eivr

    etnIX

    XX

    )P(stiduA

    repp

    ohSyr

    etsyM

    XX

    X)P(tn

    emn

    orivnE

    dell

    ortnoC

    :hcraes

    eRn

    oitavr

    esbO

    XX

    )P(tne

    mnori

    vnElarutaN:hcra

    eseR

    noita

    vresb

    OX

    XX

    )R(gnir

    otino

    Msn

    oitacinum

    moC

    dnuobtu

    OX

    XX

    )R(sn

    oitartsigeR

    ecivr

    eS/tcudorP

    XX

    XX

    )P(sl

    enaPtne

    mgeS

    XX

    )P(tne

    merusa

    eM

    ytivitisn

    eSX

    X)P(

    spohskr

    oW

    elcyCeci

    vreS

    XX

    )P(kcabllaC

    enohp

    eleT

    deta

    motuA

    -sy

    evruS

    XX

    )P(sn

    oisseS

    puor

    G-

    sye

    vruSX

    X)P(

    sw

    eivr

    etnIn

    osrep

    -nI-

    sye

    vruSX

    X)P(lia

    M-

    sye

    vruSX

    X)P(

    ecivr

    eS/elaSf

    otnioP

    -sy

    evruS

    XX

    )P(en

    ohpel

    eT-

    sye

    vruSX

    X)P(

    hcraes

    eReulaV

    XX

    X

    ADDITIONAL SOURCES OF INFORMATION

    P =

    Pro

    acti

    ve T

    ool,

    i.e.,

    you

    init

    iate

    the

    info

    rmat

    ion

    requ

    est

    R =

    Rea

    ctiv

    e T

    ool,

    i.e.,

    the

    info

    rmat

    ion

    com

    es to

    you

    whe

    ther

    you

    take

    act

    ion

    or n

    ot

    Not

    e: T

    he

    P

    or

    R

    des

    igna

    tion

    ind

    icat

    es th

    e p

    rim

    ary

    use

    of t

    he to

    ol.

  • 30 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    Three most common methods for gathering proactivecustomer data are interviews, focus groups, andsurveys. In most cases, tools need to be used incombination.

    Tools, used in combination, move you from onelevel of certainty to the next.

    All tools need to move you towards greater

    certainty - uncertain certain more certain. Theissues for selection include:

    How much certainty do you need? How much certainty can you afford? How much uncertainty can you risk?

    Telephone interviews to

    identify baseline issues and opinions

    Focus groups to obtain deeper understanding

    Survey to verifyand quantify

  • 31 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    InterviewsPurposes of using interviews are to learn about aspecific customers point of view on issues, at-tributes, and performance indicators/measures.

    The different types of interviews are:

    fosepyTsweivretnI

    dedeeNnoitamrofnIfoscitsiretcarahC

    laudividnIsevitcepsrepeuqinU

    noitapicitraplevel-roineSremotsucemulov-egralmorftupnI

    puorG

    ralimishtiwsremotsucmorfnoitamrofnIsdeenecivres

    noitapicitraplevel-rewolot-diMamorfelpoepynammorfnoitamrofnI

    tnemgeselgnis

    /enohpeleTliam

    ylediweraohwsremotsucmorftupnIyllacihpargoegdesrepsid

    seussielpmisrocisabnonoitamrofnInoitcellocnoitamrofnifodnuoranrutkciuQ

    Advantages: Flexibility: Able to obtain more detailed

    explanations; can probe and clarify Greater complexity: Able to administer

    highly complex questionnaires/surveys; canexplain questions to interviewee

  • 32 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    Able to reach all population types: Able tointerview populations that are difficult orimpossible to reach by other methods

    High response rate: Degree to whichinformation collection process reaches alltargets is higher

    Assurance that instructions are followedDisadvantages:

    High cost: Process of administering is costly Interviewer bias: The least reliable form of

    data collection the interviewer mayinfluence the responses to the questionnaire

    Less anonymity Limit to 15-20 minutes (business-to-business

    45-50 minutes) Difficult to analyze or to generate supportable

    quantitative evidence Sample size may not be sufficient to draw

    supportable conclusions Positive response bias (people give higher

    ratings in personal interviews)

    TIP: Interviews are generally used to gather

    qualitative information. If your need is forquantitative data, gather information throughwell-designed surveys.

  • 33 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    Focus GroupsFocus groups, lead by a moderator, are typicallycomposed of 7 to 13 participants who share charac-teristics that relate to the focus group topic. Aminimum of three focus groups are conducted askingparticipants to thoroughly discuss a limited numberof topics and are two to four hours in duration.

    Use Focus Groups When: You need to make or confirm market segmen-

    tation decisions Hypotheses about the market and customer

    values need to be developed or tested inexploratory or preliminary studies

    A communication gap appears to exist betweenyour company and the market segment

    Insight is needed into complicated topicswhere opinions and attitudes are conditional

    Synergy among individuals would be useful increating ideas

    Hypotheses need to be developed in prepara-tion for a broad survey or large scale study

    A higher value is placed on capturing open-ended comments than data from the targetaudience

    Do Not Use Focus Groups When: The environment is emotionally charged and

    more information of any type is likely tointensify the conflict

  • 34 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    Highly valid quantitative data is needed Other methodologies can produce either better

    quality or more economical information Selling services

    Steps for conducting a focus group include:

    1. Plan the focus group session: Determine why you are conducting the study Determine who the participants should be Write the research questions keep the list

    short Draft the structure and flow of the session Select focus group location and schedule

    groups Develop a plan and estimate resources needed Test the questions Finalize the questions and the flow of the

    session

    2. Lead the focus group

    3. Analyze the focus group findings

  • 35 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    SurveysSurveys are used to measure the importance andsatisfaction/perception of performance against anattribute or customer characteristic. Some of thedifferent types of surveys are listed in the table onthe following page.

    The wording and question format must be chosenwith care. Wording of the questions should:

    Use simple words Avoid ambiguous words or questions Avoid biased or leading questions Avoid generalizations and estimates Avoid double-barreled questions

    Types of question formats include: open-ended questions multichotomous (fixed alternative) questions dichotomous questions (Yes or No) scales matrix

    The order in which questions are presented can becrucial to the success of the data collection effort andtherefore, the success of the benchmarking effort.

    The questionnaire should have a logical order.Sudden changes in topics or jumping aroundfrom topic to topic should be avoided. Thegeneral order of issues in the questionnaireshould mimic the outline of the final report.

  • 36 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    Use simple, interesting, and nonthreateningopening questions. The first few questionsmay determine whether respondents decide ifthey will even participate in the study. Ifrespondents cannot answer the first questionseasily or find them threatening in any way,they may refuse to look at the rest of thequestionnaire.

    Use the funnel approach. The funnel approachstarts with broad questions and progressivelynarrows down the scope as necessary.

    Design branching questions with care.Branching questions direct respondents todifferent places in the questionnaire based ontheir response to the question at hand. (Forexample If you answered no, go to question17.) These types of questions are moreeffective in a telephone or in-person interviewas they may appear cumbersome or confusingto those responding via the mail.

    Ask for classification information last. Place difficult or sensitive questions through-

    out the questionnaire. Involvement lessens theprobability of negative actions.

    It is useful to first pilot the survey with a group ofpeople who are not part of the project. Their feed-back provides important information on the clarityof the questions as well as the delivery mode.

  • 37 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    DIF

    FER

    ENT

    TYPE

    S O

    F SU

    RVE

    YS A

    ND

    TH

    EIR

    EFF

    ECTI

    VEN

    ESS

    citsiretcarahClia

    Me

    nohPweivret

    nI

    enohP

    detamot

    uAkcaBllaC

    reweivret

    nIderetsi

    nimdA

    puorG

    snoisseSnettir

    Wci

    nortcelE

    stsocnoitcelloc

    ataDw

    oLetar

    edo

    Metar

    edo

    MhgiH

    etared

    oM

    woL

    tcellocot

    deriuqer

    emiTatad

    hgiHw

    oLmuid

    eM

    hgiHmuid

    eM

    woL

    atades

    nopseRetar

    edo

    MhgiH

    etared

    oM

    hgiHhgiH

    hgiH

    saibre

    weivretnI

    enoN

    etared

    oM

    enoN

    hgiHw

    oLen

    oN

    fohtg

    nelelbatpeccA

    yevrus

    gnoL

    trohS

    mumixa

    m(51

    )setuni

    m

    muide

    Mot

    muide

    Mgn

    oLgn

    oLtr

    ohS01

    -5(

    )setuni

    m

    -nepo

    niatboot

    ytilibAses

    nopserded

    new

    oLw

    oLw

    oLhgiH

    hgiHmuid

    eM

    ytimy

    nona

    deviecrePhgiH

    woL

    hgiHw

    oLetar

    edo

    Men

    oN

  • 38 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    Affinity DiagramsAn affinity diagram is a good tool to organizelanguage data into related groups. Unlike other datatools, the creation of an affinity diagram stressescreative or intuitive thinking more than logicalthinking.

    The affinity diagram is used when analyzingqualitative customer data, dealing with complexproblems or issues or organizing ideas, issues, andopinions.

    1. Gather ideas from interview transcripts, surveys, etc.

    Read through your customer notes Highlight statements you think are related to

    customer needs The need statements used for an affinity

    diagram should be in the customers ownlanguage if at all possible

    2. Transfer data onto index cards or self-stick notes Transcribe the strongest of these statements to

    cards or self-stick notes you can use for theaffinity diagram

    One sentence per card Try to identify positive statements turn I

    dont want X into I want Y

    3. Group the cards to find the affinity Shuffle the cards and lay them out, or ran-

    domly place self-stick notes on flipchart

  • 39 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    Theme 2

    Need 3 Need 4

    Need 5

    Need 6

    Need 7

    Title notes identifythemes

    OK to haveclusters ofone note

    Can be severallayers ofclustering

    Theme 2

    Need 3 Need 4

    Need 5

    Need 6

    Need 7

    Title notes identifythemes

    Theme 1

    Need 1 Need 2 Theme 3

    Statements written onindividual cards or notes Notes are clustered

    based on intuition, notlogic

    Theme 1

    Need 1 Need 2 Theme 3

    Statements written onindividual cards or notes Notes are clustered

    based on intuition, notlogic

    OK to haveclusters ofone note

    Can be severallayers ofclustering

    Theme 2

    Need 3 Need 4

    Need 5

    Need 6

    Need 7

    Title notes identifythemes

    OK to haveclusters ofone note

    Can be severallayers ofclustering

    Theme 2

    Need 3 Need 4

    Need 5

    Need 6

    Need 7

    Theme 1

    Need 1 Need 2 Theme 3

    Statements written onindividual cards or notes Notes are clustered

    based on intuition, notlogic

    Theme 1

    Need 1 Need 2 Theme 3

    Statements written onindividual cards or notes Notes are clustered

    based on intuition, notlogic

    Theme 1

    Need 1 Need 2 Theme 3

    Statements written onindividual cards or notes Notes are clustered

    based on intuition, notlogic

    Theme 1

    Need 1 Need 2 Theme 3

    Statements written onindividual cards or notes Notes are clustered

    based on intuition, notlogic

    Theme 1

    Need 1 Need 2 Theme 3

    Statements written onindividual cards or notes Notes are clustered

    based on intuition, notlogic

    Theme 1

    Need 1 Need 2 Theme 3

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    Read each card or note slowly two or threetimes to yourself

    Group cards that seem to fit together~ similar based on feeling and pre-logic

    (right brain sorting)~ let the cards group themselves

    4. Label the groups of cards5. Optional: group the clusters6. Draw the diagram The data can now be taken into a structure tree

    or CTQ Tree

  • 40 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    Kano AnalysisMethod of understanding that product/service/process characteristics relate to different types ofcustomer needs. This model of quality was devel-oped by Dr. Noriaki Kano, one of the most promi-nent figures in Japans quality movement. Heoutlines three basic types of customer reactions toquality features or characteristics.

    Must-Be: For any process or product/service,certain features or characteristics must bepresent or the customer will be frustrated orangry. For instance, when you buy a shirt, youexpect it to have all its buttons. As indicated bythe line on the diagram, the absence of a Must-Be feature will disappoint or anger us, but itspresence can only bring us up to neutral.

    More is Better: Customers view other featuresor characteristics as more is better. A small,skimpy towel in a hotel room might bedisappointing, while a larger, luxurious towelmight be delightful. However, there areusually limits. For instance, wed have troubleusing a towel the size of a bedspread.

    Delighters: Special features or characteristicsthat the customer doesnt expect, but findsuseful when present, are called delighters.The more unexpected and more useful afeature, the more likely it is to create truedelight. Finding a coffee maker and cable TV

  • 41 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    with free movie channels in a budget hotelroom, for instance, might delight us.

    Customer perceptions are a moving target. Some-thing that starts off as a Delighter can soon become aMust-Be (such as remote controls for TVs and VCRs).

    TIPS Customers generally only mention More is

    Better issues. Must-Bes are generally more important to

    them, even though they are taken for granted.Do not omit these Must-Bes from the design.

    The importance of Delighters is generallyguessed at based on expert knowledge fromthe marketplace, since customers seldommention needs they dont know can befulfilled.

    Dont expect that you will get Must-Bes fromthe regular VOC. Must-Bes are generallyunspoken and need to be uncovered throughspecial research, i.e., complaint data, regula-tions, etc.

    Use for trade-offs, prioritization. Focus first on the must-bes and, more

    importantly more is better

  • 42 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    KANO ANALYSIS

    Delighters

    More

    Is Be

    tter

    Must Be

    Delight

    Neutral

    Dissatisfaction

    Custo

    mer

    Satis

    fac

    tion

    Degree ofAchievement

    FulfilledAbsent

    PleasedResignedto Reality

    Taken forGranted

    NotPleased

  • 43 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    1.Identify

    customersand

    determinewhat you

    need to know

    2.Collect and

    analyzereactive

    system datathen fill gaps

    with proactive

    approaches

    3.Analyzedata to

    generate akey list ofcustomerneeds in

    theirlanguage

    IDENTIFY KEY CUSTOMER ISSUES1. Group similar and common statements

    received from customers. Select or adjustcomments from each group to form a singlestatement which best represents the VOC.

    2. Based on clarification gathered throughVOC, state the key customer issue (con-cerns, values or expectations) associatedwith each VOC statement.

    3. Clarify, in measurable and specific terms, thecustomer requirement(s) associated with thekey customer issues.

    4. In gathering the VOC, steer customers awayfrom solutions; keep them focused on needsand wants. This will prevent the design teamfrom prematurely locking into one or twoideas.

    CTQ (Critical to Quality)A design CTQ is a quantifiable (and measurable)characteristic of the product/process/service forwhich targets, allowable variation, and allowabledefect rates (sigma levels) can be established.

  • 44 Johnson & Johnson 2005

    CHAPTER TWO MEASURE

    CTQ

    TR

    EEVoic

    e of

    the

    Cus

    tom

    erK

    ey C

    usto

    mer

    Issu

    eC

    ritic

    al to

    Qua

    lity

    Req

    uire

    men

    t

    Actu

    al c

    usto

    mer

    sta

    tem

    ents

    and

    com

    men

    ts w

    hich

    refle

    ct th

    eir

    perc

    eptio

    n of

    :

    An a

    ttrib

    ute

    of a

    pro

    cess

    or

    serv

    ice

    An e

    xper

    ience

    with

    a p

    roce

    ss o

    f se

    rvice

    or i

    ts de

    liver

    y

    An e

    ncou

    nter

    or e

    xper

    ienc

    e with

    a

    busi

    ness

    pro

    cess

    es o

    r re

    pres

    enta

    tive

    This

    mow

    er s

    houl

    d be

    eas

    y to

    star

    tT

    he c

    ord

    shou

    ldn

    t be

    too

    hard

    to

    pull.

    I w

    ant t

    o ta

    lk to

    the

    right

    per

    son

    and

    don

    t wan

    t to

    wai

    t on

    hold

    too

    long

    .

    This

    pac

    kage

    doe

    snt

    do s

    quat

    The

    real

    cust

    omer

    con

    cern

    s, v

    alue

    s or

    exp

    ecta

    tions

    rega

    rding

    a p

    rodu

    ct

    or s

    ervi

    ce.

    Void

    of e

    mot

    ion

    or b

    ias,

    the

    stat

    emen

    t des

    cribe

    s th

    e pr

    imar

    y is

    sue

    a cus

    tomer

    may

    hav

    e w

    ith th

    e pr

    oduc

    t or s

    ervic

    es.

    Desc

    ribes

    the

    expe

    rienc

    e su

    rroun

    ding

    the

    attri

    bute

    s of

    the

    prod

    uct o

    r ser

    vice

    exp

    ecte

    d or

    de

    sire

    d by

    the

    cust

    omer

    .

    Wan

    ts th

    e m

    ower

    to s

    tart

    quick

    ly an

    d pa

    inle

    ssly

    Wan

    ts to

    talk

    to th

    e rig

    ht p

    erso

    n qu

    ickly

    The

    softw

    are

    does

    wha

    t the

    ven

    dor

    said

    it wou

    ld d

    o.

    The

    spec

    ific, p

    reci

    se a

    nd m

    easu

    rabl

    e ch

    arac

    teris

    tic o

    f the

    pro

    cess

    or s

    ervi

    ce

    M

    ower

    sta

    rts w

    ithin

    two

    pulls

    on

    the

    cord

    M

    ower

    sta

    rts w

    ith a

    n ef

    fortl

    ess

    pull

    on th

    e co

    rd n

    ot e

    xcee

    ding

    24

    in

    leng

    th

    Ad

    d ad

    ditio

    nal m

    enu

    item

    s to

    the

    voice

    syst

    em (b

    ad)

    C

    usto

    mer

    reac

    hes

    corre

    ct p

    erso

    n th

    e fir

    st ti

    me w

    ithin

    30 s

    econ

    ds

    (goo

    d)

    Ev

    ery

    desig

    n fe

    atur

    e ne

    eded

    is

    built

    into

    the

    pack

    age

    Th

    e so

    ftwar

    e is

    fully

    ope

    ratio

    nal

    on th

    e cu

    stom

    ers

    exist

    ing

    syst

    em

    Voic

    e of

    the

    Cus

    tom

    erK

    ey C

    usto

    mer

    Issu

    e

    Actu

    al c

    usto

    mer

    sta

    tem

    ents

    and

    com

    men

    ts w

    hich

    refle

    ct th

    eir

    perc

    eptio

    n of

    :

    An a

    ttrib

    ute

    of a

    pro

    cess

    or

    serv

    ice

    An e

    xper

    ience

    with

    a p

    roce

    ss o

    f se

    rvice

    or i

    ts de

    liver

    y

    An e

    ncou

    nter

    or e

    xper

    ienc

    e with

    a

    busi

    ness

    pro

    cess

    es o

    r re

    pres

    enta

    tive

    This

    mow

    er s

    houl

    d be

    eas

    y to

    star

    tT

    he c

    ord

    shou

    ldn

    t be

    too

    hard

    to

    pull.

    I w

    ant t

    o ta

    lk to

    the

    right

    per

    son

    and

    don

    t wan

    t to

    wai

    t on

    hold

    too

    long

    .

    This

    pac

    kage

    doe

    snt

    do s

    quat

    Actu

    al c

    usto

    mer

    sta

    tem

    ents

    and

    com

    men

    ts w

    hich

    refle

    ct th

    eir

    perc

    eptio

    n of

    :

    An a

    ttrib

    ute

    of a

    pro

    cess

    or

    serv

    ice

    An e

    xper

    ience

    with

    a p

    roce

    ss o

    rse

    rvice

    or i

    ts de

    liver

    y

    An e

    ncou

    nter

    or e

    xper

    ienc

    e with

    a

    busi

    ness

    pro

    cess

    or

    repr

    esen

    tativ

    e

    This

    mow

    er s

    houl

    d be

    eas

    y to

    star

    t.T

    he c

    ord

    shou

    ldn

    t be

    too

    hard

    to

    pull.

    I w

    ant t

    o ta

    lk to

    the

    right

    per

    son

    and

    don

    t wan

    t to

    wai

    t on

    hold

    too

    long

    .

    This

    pac

    kage

    doe

    snt

    do s

    quat

    .

    The

    real

    cust

    omer

    con

    cern

    s, v

    alue

    s or

    exp

    ecta

    tions

    rega

    rding

    a p

    rodu

    ct

    or s

    ervi

    ce.

    Void

    of e

    mot

    ion

    or b

    ias,

    the

    stat

    emen

    t des

    cribe

    s th

    e pr

    imar

    y is

    sue

    a cus

    tomer

    may

    hav

    e w

    ith th

    e pr

    oduc

    t or s

    ervic

    es.

    Desc

    ribes

    the

    expe

    rienc

    e su

    rroun

    ding

    the

    attri

    bute

    s of

    the

    prod

    uct o

    r ser

    vice

    exp

    ecte

    d or

    de

    sire

    d by

    the

    cust

    omer

    .

    Wan

    ts th

    e m

    ower

    to s

    tart

    quick

    ly an

    d pa

    inle

    ssly

    Wan

    ts to

    talk

    to th

    e rig

    ht p

    erso

    n qu

    ickly

    The

    softw

    are

    does

    wha

    t the

    ven

    dor

    said

    it wou

    ld d

    o.

    The

    real

    cust

    omer

    con

    cern

    s, v

    alue

    s or

    exp

    ecta

    tions

    rega

    rding

    a p

    rodu

    ct

    or s

    ervi

    ce.

    Void

    of e

    mot

    ion

    or b

    ias,

    the

    stat

    emen

    t des

    cribe

    s th

    e pr

    imar

    y is

    sue

    a cus

    tomer

    may

    hav

    e w

    ith th

    e pr

    oduc

    t or s

    ervic

    e.De

    scrib

    es th

    e ex

    perie

    nce

    surro

    undi

    ng th

    e at

    tribu

    tes

    of th

    e pr

    oduc

    t or s

    ervi

    ce e

    xpec

    ted

    or

    desi

    red

    by th

    e cu

    stom

    er.

    Wan

    ts th

    e m

    ower

    to s

    tart

    quick

    ly an

    d pa

    inle

    ssly.

    Wan

    ts to

    talk

    to th

    e rig

    ht p

    erso

    n qu

    ickly.

    The

    softw

    are

    does

    wha

    t the

    ven

    dor

    said

    it wou

    ld d

    o.

    The

    spec

    ific, p

    reci

    se a

    nd m

    easu

    rabl

    e ch

    arac

    teris

    tic o

    f the

    pro

    cess

    or s

    ervi

    ce

    M

    ower

    sta

    rts w

    ithin

    two

    pulls

    on

    the

    cord

    M

    ower

    sta

    rts w

    ith a

    n ef

    fortl

    ess

    pull

    on th

    e co

    rd n

    ot e

    xcee

    ding

    24

    in

    leng

    th

    Ad

    d ad

    ditio

    nal m

    enu

    item

    s to

    the

    voice

    syst

    em (b

    ad)

    C

    usto

    mer

    reac

    hes

    corre

    ct p

    erso

    n th

    e fir

    st ti

    me w

    ithin

    30 s

    econ

    ds

    (goo

    d)

    Ev

    ery

    desig

    n fe

    atur

    e ne

    eded

    is

    built

    into

    the

    pack

    age

    Th

    e so

    ftwar

    e is

    fully

    ope

    ratio

    nal

    on th

    e cu

    stom

    ers

    exist

    ing

    syst

    em

    The

    spec

    ific, p

    reci

    se a

    nd m

    easu

    rabl

    e ch

    arac

    teris

    tic o

    f the

    pro

    cess

    or s

    ervi

    ce

    M

    ower

    sta

    rts w

    ithin

    two

    pulls

    on

    the

    cord

    M

    ower

    sta

    rts w

    ith a

    n ef

    fortl

    ess

    pull

    on th

    e co

    rd n

    ot e

    xcee

    ding

    24

    in

    leng

    th

    Ad

    d ad

    ditio

    nal m

    enu

    item

    s to

    the

    voice

    syst

    em (b

    ad)

    C

    usto

    mer

    reac

    hes

    corre

    ct p

    erso

    n th

    e fir

    st ti

    me w

    ithin

    30 s

    econ

    ds

    (goo

    d)

    Ev

    ery

    desig

    n fe

    atur

    e ne

    eded

    is

    built

    into

    the

    pack

    age

    Th

    e so

    ftwar

    e is

    fully

    ope

    ratio

    nal

    on th

    e cu

    stom

    ers

    exist

    ing

    syst

    em

    Voic

    e of

    the

    Cus

    tom

    erK

    ey C

    usto

    mer

    Issu

    eC

    ritic

    al to

    Qua

    lity

    Req

    uire

    men

    t

    Actu

    al c

    usto

    mer

    sta

    tem

    ents

    and

    com

    men

    ts w

    hich

    refle

    ct th

    eir

    perc

    eptio

    n of

    :

    An a

    ttrib

    ute

    of a

    pro

    cess

    or

    serv

    ice

    An e

    xper

    ience

    with

    a p

    roce

    ss o

    f se

    rvice

    or i

    ts de

    liver

    y

    An e

    ncou

    nter

    or e

    xper

    ienc

    e with

    a

    busi

    ness

    pro

    cess

    es o

    r re

    pres

    enta

    tive

    This

    mow

    er s

    houl

    d be

    eas

    y to

    star

    tT

    he c

    ord

    shou

    ldn

    t be

    too

    hard

    to

    pull.

    I w

    ant t

    o ta

    lk to

    the

    right

    per

    son

    and

    don

    t wan

    t to

    wai

    t on

    hold

    too

    long

    .

    This

    pac

    kage

    doe

    snt

    do s

    quat

    Actu

    al c

    usto

    mer

    sta

    tem

    ents

    and

    com

    men

    ts w

    hich

    refle

    ct th

    eir

    perc

    eptio

    n of

    :

    An a

    ttrib

    ute

    of a

    pro

    cess

    or

    serv

    ice

    An e

    xper

    ience

    with

    a p

    roce

    ss o

    f se

    rvice

    or i

    ts de

    liver

    y

    An e

    ncou

    nter

    or e

    xper

    ienc

    e with

    a

    busi

    ness

    pro

    cess

    es o

    r re

    pres

    enta

    tive

    This

    mow

    er s

    houl

    d be

    eas

    y to

    star

    tT

    he c

    ord

    shou

    ldn

    t be

    too

    hard

    to

    pull.

    I w

    ant t

    o ta

    lk to

    the

    right

    per

    son

    and

    don

    t wan

    t to

    wai

    t on

    hold

    too

    long

    .

    This

    pac

    kage

    doe

    snt

    do s

    quat

    The

    real

    cust

    omer

    con

    cern

    s, v

    alue

    s or

    exp

    ecta

    tions

    rega

    rding

    a p

    rodu

    ct

    or s

    ervi

    ce.

    Void

    of e

    mot

    ion

    or b

    ias,

    the

    stat

    emen

    t des

    cribe

    s th

    e pr

    imar

    y is

    sue

    a cus

    tomer

    may

    hav

    e w

    ith th

    e pr

    oduc

    t or s

    ervic

    es.

    Desc

    ribes

    the

    expe

    rienc

    e su

    rroun

    ding

    the

    attri

    bute

    s of

    the

    prod

    uct o

    r ser

    vice

    exp

    ecte

    d or

    de

    sire

    d by

    the

    cust

    omer

    .

    Wan

    ts th

    e m

    ower

    to s

    tart

    quick

    ly an

    d pa

    inle

    ssly

    Wan

    ts to

    talk

    to th

    e rig

    ht p

    erso

    n qu

    ickly

    The

    softw

    are

    does

    wha

    t the

    ven

    dor

    said

    it wou

    ld d

    o.

    The

    real

    cust

    omer

    con

    cern

    s, v

    alue

    s or

    exp

    ecta

    tions

    rega

    rding

    a p

    rodu

    ct

    or s

    ervi

    ce.

    Void

    of e

    mot

    ion

    or b

    ias,

    the

    stat

    emen

    t des

    cribe

    s th

    e pr

    imar

    y is

    sue

    a cus

    tomer

    may

    hav

    e w

    ith th

    e pr

    oduc

    t or s

    ervic

    es.

    Desc

    ribes

    the

    expe

    rienc

    e su

    rroun

    ding

    the

    attri

    bute

    s of

    the

    prod

    uct o

    r ser

    vice

    exp

    ecte

    d or

    de

    sire

    d by

    the

    cust

    omer

    .

    Wan

    ts th

    e m

    ower

    to s

    tart

    quick

    ly an

    d pa

    inle

    ssly

    Wan

    ts to

    talk

    to th

    e rig

    ht p

    erso

    n qu

    ickly

    The

    softw

    are

    does

    wha

    t the

    ven

    dor

    said

    it wou

    ld d

    o.

    The

    spec

    ific, p

    reci

    se a

    nd m

    easu

    rabl

    e ch

    arac

    teris

    tic o

    f the

    pro

    cess

    or s

    ervi

    ce

    M

    ower

    sta

    rts w

    ithin

    two

    pulls

    on

    the

    cord

    M

    ower

    sta

    rts w

    ith a

    n ef

    fortl

    ess

    pull

    on th

    e co

    rd n

    ot e

    xcee

    ding

    24

    in

    leng

    th

    Ad

    d ad

    ditio

    nal m

    enu

    item

    s to

    the

    voice

    syst

    em (b

    ad)

    C

    usto

    mer

    reac

    hes

    corre

    ct p

    erso

    n th

    e fir

    st ti

    me w

    ithin

    30 s

    econ

    ds

    (goo

    d)

    Ev

    ery

    desig

    n fe

    atur

    e ne

    eded

    is

    built

    into

    the

    pack

    age

    Th

    e so

    ftwar

    e is

    fully

    ope

    ratio

    nal

    on th

    e cu

    stom

    ers

    exist

    ing

    syst

    em

    The

    spec

    ific, p

    reci

    se a

    nd m

    easu

    rabl

    e ch

    arac

    teris

    tic o

    f the

    pro

    cess

    or s

    ervi

    ce

    M

    ower

    sta

    rts w

    ithin

    two

    pulls

    on

    the

    cord

    M

    ower

    sta

    rts w

    ith a

    n ef

    fortl

    ess

    pull

    on th

    e co

    rd n

    ot e

    xcee

    ding

    24

    in

    leng

    th

    Ad

    d ad

    ditio

    nal m

    enu

    item

    s to

    the

    voice

    syst

    em (b

    ad)

    C

    usto

    mer

    reac

    hes

    corre

    ct p

    erso

    n th

    e fir

    st ti

    me w

    ithin

    30 s

    econ

    ds

    (goo

    d)

    Ev

    ery

    desig

    n fe

    atur

    e ne

    eded

    is

    built

    into

    the

    pack

    age

    Th

    e so

    ftwar

    e is

    fully

    ope

    ratio

    nal

    on th

    e cu

    stom

    ers

    exist

    ing

    syst

    em

    Voic

    e of

    the

    Cus

    tom

    erK

    ey C

    usto

    mer

    Issu

    e

    Actu

    al c

    usto

    mer

    sta

    tem

    ents

    and

    com

    men

    ts w

    hich

    refle

    ct th

    eir

    perc

    eptio

    n of

    :

    An a

    ttrib

    ute

    of a

    pro

    cess

    or

    serv

    ice

    An e

    xper

    ience

    with

    a p

    roce

    ss o

    f se

    rvice

    or i

    ts de

    liver

    y

    An e

    ncou

    nter

    or e

    xper

    ienc

    e with

    a

    busi

    ness

    pro

    cess

    es o

    r re

    pres

    enta

    tive

    This

    mow

    er s

    houl

    d be

    eas

    y to

    star

    tT

    he c

    ord

    shou

    ldn

    t be

    too

    hard

    to

    pull.

    I w

    ant t

    o ta

    lk to

    the

    right

    per

    son

    and

    don

    t wan

    t to

    wai

    t on

    hold

    too

    long

    .

    This

    pac

    kage

    doe

    snt

    do s

    quat

    Actu

    al c

    usto

    mer

    sta

    tem

    ents

    and

    com

    men

    ts w

    hich

    refle

    ct th

    eir

    perc

    eptio

    n of

    :

    An a

    ttrib

    ute

    of a

    pro

    cess

    or

    serv

    ice

    An e

    xper

    ience

    with

    a p

    roce

    ss o

    rse

    rvice

    or i

    ts de

    liver

    y

    An e

    ncou

    nter

    or e

    xper

    ienc

    e with

    a

    busi

    ness

    pro

    cess

    or

    repr

    esen

    tativ

    e

    This

    mow

    er s

    houl

    d be

    eas

    y to

    star

    t.T

    he c

    ord

    shou

    ldn

    t be

    too

    hard

    to

    pull.

    I w

    ant t

    o ta

    lk to

    the

    right

    per

    son

    and

    don

    t wan

    t to

    wai

    t on

    hold

    too

    long

    .

    This

    pac

    kage

    doe

    snt

    do s

    quat

    .

    The

    real

    cust

    omer

    con

    cern

    s, v

    alue

    s or

    exp

    ecta

    tions

    rega

    rding

    a p

    rodu

    ct

    or s

    ervi

    ce.

    Void

    of e

    mot

    ion

    or b

    ias,

    the

    stat

    emen

    t des

    cribe

    s th

    e pr

    imar

    y is

    sue

    a cus

    tomer

    may

    hav

    e w

    ith th

    e pr

    oduc

    t