design for excellence pocketguide
DESCRIPTION
Pocket version of a design for excellence DMADV^2TRANSCRIPT
-
Johnson & Johnson 2003
A team of Design Excellence Subject Matter Expertswithin Johnson & Johnson, with support from out-side consultants, developed this Design Excellencepocket guide for exclusive use by Johnson & Johnsonassociates. These experts represented not only thedifferent company groups within Johnson & Johnson,but also different focus areas (product, process andservice design and development). I would like toacknowledge the passionate and dedicated efforts ofthese individuals and outside consultants indeveloping this pocket guide to enable and improvethe implementation of Design Excellence withinJohnson & Johnson:
Kent Allen EES, DEx SME Team Leader2000-2002
Bill Dean MD & DVanessa Evans CPCDoug Fraits PharmJohn Gilbert CPCJerry Mergen CP & NPatrick Murphy JJPE, World HeadquartersBarry Rhein JJPE, AssessmentFilip Vanhoutte Pharm
Venky Gopalaswamy, Ph.DJJPE, Methodologies and DEx SME Team Leader
Johnson & Johnson 2005
A team of Design Excellence Subject Matter Expertswithin Johnson & Johnson, with support from out-side consultants, developed the Design Excellencepocket guide in 2003 for exclusive use by Johnson &Johnson associates. These experts represented notonly the different company groups within Johnson& Johnson, but also different focus areas (product,process and service development). In 2004, the DExcurriculum was revised with new and/or modifiedmaterials to reflect our latest thinking. This versionof the pocket guide reflects the changes to thecourse material. I would like to acknowledge thepassionate and dedicated efforts of these individualsand outside consultants in developing and improv-ing the DEx course material and this pocket guideto enable and improve successful implementation ofDesign Excellence at Johnson & Johnson.
Gregg Alexander JJPRD, USAKen Creasy DePuy Codman, USATracy Flathmann JJPRD, USABarbara M. Hansen CPC, USACarl Lewis COIM, USAJeff Morris Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, USABarry Rhein JJPE, USAHelen Tai CPC, USAFilip Vanhoutte JJPRD, Belgium
Venky Gopalaswamy, Ph.DJJPE, Methodologies and DEx SME Team Leader
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
-
Johnson & Johnson 2003 I
Welcome to the Design Excellence (DEx) PocketGuide. This guide is designed to support youduring the implementation of DEx projects. Thispocket guide is not meant to replace training orguidance from Master Black Belts or SubjectMatter Experts. It is meant to supplement thesesources of information.
DEx is a set of design tools and methodologies forimproving product/services/processes develop-ment to consistently provide reliable and manu-facturable products/services/processes thatconsistently meet customer requirements. Thisguide highlights key tools used in the phases of theDEx methodology. It is arranged in the phases ofthe methodology Define, Measure, Analyze,Design, Verify/Validate DMADV2. In the next fewpages, representations of the linkage between DExroadmap and New Product Development (NPD /Information System Development Life Cycle (SDLC)are provided. Please use the one that is applicable toyour project.
Johnson & Johnson 2005
Welcome to the Design Excellence (DEx) PocketGuide. This guide is designed to support you dur-ing the implementation of DEx projects and notmeant to replace training or guidance from MasterBlack Belts or Subject Matter Experts. It is meant tosupplement these primary sources of DEx subjectmatter expertise. Other supporting materials forDEx deployment include off-the-shelf software andelectronic tool templates, information for which isprovided with the course material.
DEx is the disciplined application of tools andmethodologies used to design and develop prod-ucts, processes and services that consistently meetor exceed internal and external customer require-ments. This guide highlights key tools used in thephases of the DEx methodology. It is arranged inthe phases of the methodology Define, Measure,Analyze, Design, and Verify/Validate DMADV2.In the next few pages, representations of the linkagebetween DEx roadmap and New ProductDevelopment (NPD/Information SystemsDevelopment Life Cycle (SDLC) are provided. If anexisting NPD/SDLC roadmap in your companysupports your project please make sure you mapthe DEx tools to appropriate design phases.Otherwise, please use one of the applicableroadmaps in this pocket guide.
INTRODUCTION
I
DEx Pocket Guide
-
Johnson & Johnson 2003II
There are also two tables provided on pages XII-XVIII, one each for New Product Development(NPD) and Services and Processes (S&P). Thesetables include references to DEx tools and the DExphases where they are mostly applicable. Please notethat the linkages in these tables are provided only asreferences based on common practice. These linkagescan be different depending on the emphasis placedon specific tools within your operating company.
As you move through project implementation, callon your Process Excellence (PE) leaders andMaster Black Belts for assistance and guidance.The PE leaders role is to ensure successfulidentification and completion of projects employ-ing the PE methodology. The role of the MasterBlack Belts is to coach and guide you with thecorrect use of tools and roadmaps to meet yourdeliverables.
Johnson & Johnson 2005
There are also two tables provided on pages XII-XVIII, one each for New Product Development(NPD) and Services and Processes (S&P). Thesetables include references to DEx tools and the DExphases where they are mostly applicable. Pleasenote that the linkages in these tables are providedonly as references based on common practice.These linkages can be different depending on theemphasis placed on specific tools within your oper-ating company.
As you move through project implementation, callon your Process Excellence (PE) leaders and MasterBlack Belts for assistance and guidance. The PEleaders role is to ensure successful identificationand completion of projects employing the PEmethodology. The role of the Master Black Belts isto coach and guide you with the correct use of toolsand roadmaps to meet your deliverables.
INTRODUCTION
II
-
Johnson & Johnson 2003
INTRODUCTION
III
CCCCoooonnnncccceeeepppptttt PPPPllllaaaannnnnnnniiiinnnngggg DDDDeeeevvvveeeellllooooppppmmmmeeeennnntttt PPPPrrrreeee----LLLLaaaauuuunnnncccchhhh &&&& SSSSccccaaaalllleeee----UUUUpppp PPPPoooosssstttt----LLLLaaaauuuunnnncccchhhh
Representations of Design Excellence and NPD linkage in MD&D
CCCCoooonnnncccceeeepppptttt FFFFeeeeaaaassssiiiibbbbiiiilllliiiittttyyyy DDDDeeeessssiiiiggggnnnn PPPPiiiillllooootttt MMMMffffgggg....IIIImmmmpppplllleeeemmmm....
Strategy Feasibility DDDDeeeevvvveeeellllooooppppmmmmeeeennnntttt Implementation Base Business
DDDDeeeeffffiiiinnnneeee MMMMeeeeaaaassssuuuurrrreeee
AAAAnnnnaaaallllyyyyzzzzeeee DDDDeeeessssiiiiggggnnnn
VVVVeeeerrrriiiiffffyyyy////VVVVaaaalllliiiiddddaaaatttteeee DDDDMMMMAAAAIIIIIIIICCCC
DEx Charter MGP Gantt Chart SIPOC Market Research Value Proposition Affinity Diagram
Market Research QFD Benchmarking Structure Tree Design Scorecards MSA/Gage R&R Process Capability Statistical Analysis Design for X
Design Scorecards Brainstorming Functional Diagram Process Map FMEA Risk Analysis Reliability Analysis Pugh Matrix
DOE/Simulations Design Scorecards Functional Diagram/
Structure Tree Fault Tree/Reliability
Analysis Tolerancing Robust Design MSA/Gage R&R QFD
Control Charts Statistical Analysis
Johnson & Johnson 2005 III
INTRODUCTION
-
Johnson & Johnson 2003IV
INTRODUCTION
Global New Product Process (GNPP) + DEx
Johnson & Johnson 2005IV
INTRODUCTION
-
Johnson & Johnson 2003
INTRODUCTION
V Johnson & Johnson 2005 V
INTRODUCTION
-
NNNN PPPPDDDD PPPP
SSSS tttt aaaagggg eeee
PPPP uuuurrrr pppp oooo
ssss eeee
Analyze a specific product/platform opportunity for its potential, strategic assessment, and preliminary financial attractiveness as efficiently as possi-ble
Validate the refined business concept and business oppor-tunity against prior assumptions and to develop an initial project plan
Design the product attributes, primary packaging and manu-facturing technology
Develop a precommercialization product, process and package that delivers design requirements
Finalize the commer-cial product, I. e., product, process, claims and indications
Prepare the market, achieve approval of regulatory submission and validate the manufacturing proc-ess.
Launch the product. Collect Lesson Learned
Evaluate the per-formance of the NPDP for the indi-vidual project Monitor the in-market performance of the product on an ongoing basis
OOOO bbbbjjjj eeee cccc t
ttt iiii vvvv eeee ssss
Complete an assumptionbased business opportunity
Refine assumptionbased business proposition with metrics
Update business proposition and pro-ject plan
Updated challenge statements
Develop design requirements
Updated business proposition
Updated challenge statements
Updated project plan
Confirmation of design require-ments
Updated business proposition
Updated challenge statements
Updated project plan
Confirmation of design require-ments
Updated business proposition
Updated challenge statements
Updated project plan
Confirmation of design require-ments
Execute Launch
Collect qualitative and quantitative lessons learned on NPDP for project
Track in-market performance vs launch metrics (3, 6, 12 month/ Year 1, 2, 3)
DDDD EEEExxxx
KKKK eeeeyyyy TTTT
oooo oooollll ssss a
aaa nnnndddd MMMM
eeee tttt hhhhoooo dddd
Idea Generation & Evaluation
Multi-Generational Plan
Voice of Customer Charter Risk Management
Voice of Customer Market Research Value Proposition Quality Function
Deployment (House 1)
Design Score-cards
Financial Analysis Project Plan-
ning/Management Metrics Analysis Metrics
Dashboards Risk management Intellectual Prop-
erty Packaging Con-
cept Generation & Evaluation
Intellectual Property Voice of Customer Quality Function
Deployment Design Scorecards Critical Parameters Process Mapping Design for X
(Cleaning) Risk Management Tolerance Design Statistical (Clinical)
Planning & Analysis
Statistical Analysis (Clinical)
Process Mapping Design Scorecards
and Critical Pa-rameters
Design of Experi-ments
Process Capability Analysis
Measurement Sys-tem Analysis/Gage R&R
Tolerance Design FMEA Design For Proc-
essing & Packaging Lean Design Process Control
Planning Vertical Startup
Planning Supply Chain Business Qualifica-
tion
Marketing Planning Sales Planning Statistical Analysis Process Capability
Analysis Process Control
Planning Process Mapping Stability Analysis Verifica-
tion/Validation Methods
Design of Experi-ments
Design Scorecards and Critical Pa-rameters
Reliability Centered Maintenance
Engineering Transfer
Sales Launch Plan-ning
Dashboards Process Control
Planning Materials Manage-
ment Planning Process Validation
(PQ) Statistical Analysis Engineering
Transfer
Process Control Plans
Master Batch Re-cord
Statistical Process Control
Process Improve-ment Strategy (DMAI2C)
Process Capability Design Scorecards Operational Effi-
ciency & Effective-ness (OEE)
Process Control Plans
Operational Effi-ciency & Effec-tiveness (OEE)
Statistical Analysis Statistical Process
Control Root Cause
Analysis (DMAI2C) Process Im-
provement Strat-egy (DMAI2C)
DDDD EEEExxxx DDDDeeeeffffiiiinnnneeee MMMMeeeeaaaassssuuuurrrreeee AAAAnnnnaaaallllyyyyzzzzeeee DDDDeeeessssiiiiggggnnnn VVVVeeeerrrriiiiffffyyyy aaaannnndddd
VVVVaaaalllliiiiddddaaaatttteeee DDDDMMMMAAAAIIII2222CCCC
CCCCoooonnnncccceeeepppptttt BBBBuuuussssiiiinnnneeeessssssss FFFFeeeeaaaassssiiiibbbbiiii lllliiiittttyyyy
SSSSttttaaaaggggeeee IIII DDDDeeeessssiiiiggggnnnn
SSSSttttaaaaggggeeee IIIIIIII DDDDeeeevvvveeeellllooooppppmmmmeeeennnntttt
SSSSttttaaaaggggeeee IIIIVVVV LLLLaaaauuuunnnncccchhhh RRRReeeeaaaadddd iiii----
nnnneeeessssssss
SSSSttttaaaaggggeeee VVVV LLLLaaaauuuunnnncccchhhh
SSSSttttaaaaggggeeee VVVVIIII PPPPoooosssstttt LLLLaaaauuuunnnncccchhhh
SSSSttttaaaaggggeeee IIIIIIIIIIII CCCCoooommmmmmmmeeeerrrrcccciiiiaaaalllliiiizzzz aaaa----
ttttiiiioooonnnn
MMMMccccNNNNeeeeiiiillll CCCCoooonnnnssssuuuummmmeeeerrrr aaaannnndddd SSSSppppeeeecccciiiiaaaallllttttyyyy PPPPhhhhaaaarrrrmmmmaaaacccceeeeuuuutttt iiiiccccaaaallllssss
Johnson & Johnson 2003VI
INTRODUCTION
McNeil Consumer and Speciality Pharmaceuticals
Stage IIICommercializa-
tion
Stage IVLaunch
Readiness
Johnson & Johnson 2005VI
INTRODUCTION
-
Johnson & Johnson 2003
INTRODUCTION
VII Johnson & Johnson 2005 VII
INTRODUCTION
-
Johnson & Johnson 2003
INTRODUCTION
VIII Johnson & Johnson 2005VIII
INTRODUCTION
-
Johnson & Johnson 2005
INTRODUCTION
IX
Overview of Phases of DEx
I. DEFINE Projects
II. MEASURE Requirements
II.1 Gather VOC and Competitive Information
II.2 From Needs to CTQs
II.3 Design Scorecards
Review of Measure Phase
III. ANALYZE ConceptsIII.1 Concept Generation/SelectionIII.2 Concept FeasibilityIII.3 Do It By DesignReview of Analyze Phase
IV. DESIGN in DetailIV.1 Work Out Detailed DesignsIV.2 Statistical DesignIV.3 Controlling the ProcessIV.4 PilotsReview of Design Phase
-
Johnson & Johnson 2005
INTRODUCTION
X
V. VERIFY AND VALIDATE
V.1 Plan and Conduct Verification & Validation
Activities
V.2 Evaluate Results: Iterate Design
V.3 Scale Up and Launch
Review of V&V Phase
-
Johnson & Johnson 2005
INTRODUCTION
XI
WHICH METHODOLOGY BEST FITSYOUR NEEDS?
Define
Analyze
Innovate/
Improve
Control
De
sig
n E
xcelle
nce
Six
Sig
ma
Measure
Does th
e
pro
ce
ss/
se
rvic
e
exis
t?
Yes
No Measure
Isin
cre
menta
lim
pro
vem
ent
en
oug
h?Yes
No
Analyze
Design
Verify/
Validate
Transfer
-
Johnson & Johnson 2005
INTRODUCTION
XII
emaNlooT
retpahCrebmuN
dnaegaP
VDAMDDPNfoesahP 2 nitsomsiloothcihw
,enifeD(desuylnommoc,ngiseD,ezylanA,erusaeM
)etadilaV&yfireVD M A D V2
strahcwolfytivitcA 701/3 smargaidytiniffA
suinehrrA 681/4
gnikramhcneB 05/2 gnimrotsniarB 69/3
sngisedetisopmoclartneC 861/4 retrahC 2/1
nalpnoitacinummoC
weivertpecnoC / sisylanatniojnoC 131/3
)ytilauQotlacitirC(QTC 34/2 smargaidwolftnemyolpeD 801/3
rofngiseDytilibarutcafunam
148/4
stnemirepxEfongiseD 158/4
sweiverngiseD 02/1
sdracerocsngiseD
Effective team dynamics
82/2
8313
2/38
1/17
1/3
List of Tools Used in DEx for New ProductDevelopment
-
Johnson & Johnson 2005
INTRODUCTION
XIII
emaNlooT
retpahCrebmuN
dnaegaP
VDAMDDPNfoesahP 2 nitsomsiloothcihw
,enifeD(desuylnommoc,ngiseD,ezylanA,erusaeM
)etadilaV&yfireVD M A D V2
stsetdetacnurteruliaF 182/4sisylanaeerttluaF 123/3
smargaidwolF 106/3 AEMF 118/3
spuorgsucoF 33/2 sisylanalanoitcnuF 116/3
strahCttnaG 13/1
TLAH 182/4
SSAH 182/4
looTepocs-fo-tuo/nI 7/1
sweivretnI 31/2
sisylanaPI 86/2
sisylanaonaK
tseTsillaW-laksurK 351/3
noitcnufssoL 73/2
tseTyentihW-nnaM 351/3
TSOEM 188/4
2/40
-
Johnson & Johnson 2005
INTRODUCTION
XIV
emaNlooT
retpahCrebmuN
dnaegaP
VDAMDDPNfoesahP 2 nitsomsiloothcihw
,enifeD(desuylnommoc,ngiseD,ezylanA,erusaeM
)etadilaV&yfireVD M A D V2
nalPlanoitareneg-itluM 6/1 sngisederutxiM 741/4
tsetnaidems'dooM 361/3 smargaidkrowteN 10/1
strahcTREP 41/1 ekoy-akoP 152/4
nalplortnocssecorP 192/4 ledomssecorP 112/3
nalptcejorP 9/1 gnipytotorP 137/3 xirtamhguP 115/3
DFQ 45/2 noitacilppadipaR
)DAR(tnempoleved3/131
stsetytilibaileR 182/4nwodwolfstnemeriuqeR 421/4
tnemeganamksiR 171/3 MSR 601/4
-
Johnson & Johnson 2005
INTRODUCTION
XV
emaNlooT
retpahCrebmuN
dnaegaP
VDAMDDPNfoesahP 2 nitsomsiloothcihw
,enifeD(desuylnommoc,ngiseD,ezylanA,erusaeM
)etadilaV&yfireVD M A D V2
gnippamnoituloSStability testing
98/3
4/191
sisylanaredlohekatS 15/1 syevruS 35/2
stsocelcycefillatoT 129/3 ZIRT 100/3
Value stream mapping 3/109
COV 24/2 sisylanallubieW 183/4
erutcurtsnwodkaerbkroW 11/1 801/4
sisylanaesactsroW
-
Johnson & Johnson 2005
INTRODUCTION
XVI
emaNlooT
retpahCrebmuN
dnaegaP
VDAMDP&SfoesahP 2 nitsomsiloothcihw
,enifeD(desuylnommoc,ngiseD,ezylanA,erusaeM
)etadilaV&yfireVD M A D V2
strahCwolFytivitcA 071/3smargaiDytiniffA
gnikramhcneB 2/50 gnimrotsniarB 96/3
esaCssenisuB 2/1 nalPnoitacinummoC
sisylanAtniojnoC 3/131strahClortnoC 194/4
DiagramswolFtnemyolpeD 081/3 sweiveRngiseD 20/1
sdracerocSngiseD 82/2
2/38
1/17
sisylanAeerTtluaF 123/3 AEMF 181/3
spuorGsucoF 33/2sisylanAlanoitcnuF 116/3
13/1
looTepocS-fo-tuO/nI 7/1
Gantt Charts
Effective Team Dynamics 1/3
List of Tools Used in DEx for Service &Process Development
-
Johnson & Johnson 2005
INTRODUCTION
XVII
emaNlooT
retpahCrebmuN
dnaegaP
VDAMDP&SfoesahP 2 nitsomsiloothcihw
,enifeD(desuylnommoc,ngiseD,ezylanA,erusaeM
)etadilaV&yfireVD M A D V2
sweivretnI 31/2 sisylanAonaK
tseTsillaW-laksurK 351/3 noitcnuFssoL 73/2 yentihW-nnaM 351/3
tseTs'dooM 361/3 nalPlanoitareneG-itluM 6/1
smargaiDkrowteN 1/10 smargaiDwolFytinutroppO 061/3
strahCTREP 41/1 snalPlortnoCssecorP 192/4
retrahCtcejorP 2/1 nalPtcejorP 9/1
gnipytotorP 137/3 xirtaMhguP 115/3 )QOH(DFQ 45/2
stseTytilibaileR 182/4
2/40
-
Johnson & Johnson 2005
INTRODUCTION
XVIII
emaNlooT
retpahCrebmuN
dnaegaP
VDAMDP&SfoesahP 2 nitsomsiloothcihw
,enifeD(desuylnommoc,ngiseD,ezylanA,erusaeM
)etadilaV&yfireVD M A D V2
sisylanaredlohekatS 15/1 syevruS 35/2
stsocelcycefillatoT 129/3
COV 24/2 sisylanallubieW 183/4
erutcurtsnwodkaerbkroW 1/11
Value stream mapping 3/109
-
1 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
I. DEFINE Projects
Introduction
The main purpose of the DEFINE phase is to definethe project and the opportunity. This phase is wheremanagement and the team define the objectives,allocate and secure resources (people, money, andequipment), creates a multi-generational plan, devel-ops a project plan based on the scope, and assigns rolesand responsibilities. During the DEFINE phase, theteam also identifies stakeholders, evaluates theirsupport levels, and develops strategies to improvesupport as well as creating a communication plan.When the DEFINE phase activities are not done (or notdone well), the team may find themselves failing tomeet objectives later in the project and will ultimatelyrevisit this phase. This causes time delays, disillu-sioned teams, and generally threatens a projectsviability.
-
2 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
CharterThe charter is a contract between the organizationsleadership and the team. Its purpose is: To clarify what is expected of the team To keep the team aligned with organizational
priorities To transfer the project from the champion to
the team To secure/commit team members and their
time
Elements of the charter: Goal Statement Process & Project Scope Business Case Opportunity Statement Project Plan Team Selection
The Goal Statement defines the deliverables of theproject, but does not specifically describe theproduct/service/process that is yet to be developed.
The Process & Project Scope defines the boundariesof the project. Two tools for defining scope for DExprojects are: the In/Out-of-Scope Tool and Multi-Generational Plan (MGP).
The Business Case describes the benefit to thebusiness for undertaking this project. It connects theproject to key business strategies.
-
3 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
The Opportunity Statement describes the benefitto the customers, or the value added, that the newproduct/service/process will deliver. This can be adescription of problems or challenges that customershave which could be addressed by a new product/service/process. Often key market or customersegments are described here.
The Project Plan specifies the milestones and datesfor the steps and activities in the project. Sinceprojects can be complex, more attention is given toproject planning for these projects than is usuallynecessary for sigma improvement projects.
The Team Selection describes team roles andresponsibilities. It is expected that the team and theteam members stay committed for the duration ofthe project.
Effective Team DynamicsA team is a group of people who are interdependentworking on a common goal. Teams are differentthan work groups because members are interdepen-dent on one another for task accomplishment. Ateam typically:
1. has a specific business reason, objective, orpurpose for working together
2. needs each others expertise, ability, coopera-tion, and commitment to obtain mutual goals
-
4 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
3. believes that working as a group leads to moreeffective output than working alone
4. is accountable for results in a larger organiza-tional context
Following are the characteristics of effective teams: Common Purpose Clear Roles and Responsibilities Appropriate Procedures and Processes Open Communication Active Listening Broad Participation and Contribution Shared Leadership Informal, Relaxed Atmosphere Supportive, Cooperative Relationships Confidence, Cohesion and Trust Diversity and Disagreement Valued Consensus Decision Making Planning and Coordination Follow Up and Ongoing Evaluation
There are many tools available to a team to ensurethat they perform effectively. Two of the key oneswill be highlighted in this section.
Personal Shield: During the early stages of teamformation, personal shield tool is used to effectivelyidentify and manage needs of all the individuals onthe team.
-
5 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
Responsibility (RACI) Chart: When the team isgoing through the storming phase, primary attentionshifts from what the team should do to how it shouldbe done. Team members can fight for control, andmany attempts are made to gain influence. Some orall of the team challenges the leader, either overtly orcovertly. To manage the situation better, it isimportant to define responsibilities using tools suchas RACI chart.
Name:
Unique Skills: What I Need To BeSuccessful Here:
My Leadership Credo:
Something you don'tknow about me:
DevelopmentNeeds:
-
6 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
1noitareneG 2noitareneG 3noitareneG
noisiV
/tcudorPnoitareneGecivreS
/seigolonhceTsmroftalP
Multi-Generation Plan (MGP)The MGP helps communicate the step-wise fashionthe business expects to deliver the ultimate vision.
A series of releases/transitions which includes: A long-term vision for the desired state,
product, service, or process A series of generations, with short-term
results, moving toward that ultimate vision
Vision Long-term direction for the product orservice based on anticipated evolution of customerneeds and competitor services beyond currentapplications.
Product/Service Generation Series of service/process releases; each release characterized bydistinct combinations of features or technology(At least three generations planned).
Technologies/Platforms Service/process competen-cies which can be leveraged to introduce a numberof generations quickly, and to reduce cost of newservice/process development. Ability to executethe MGP with current technology and identificationof needed technological developments includingplatforms for each generation.
-
7 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
In-and-Out-of-Scope ToolOnce the first generation has been described, it isoften useful to further define what is within thescope of the first generation project. The In-and-Out-of-Scope Tool can help this work.
Often the team and sponsor will have severaldiscussions about project scope. Using the In-and-Out-of-Scope Tool can help both the team andsponsor be clear about the boundaries of the firstgeneration product/service or process.
Brainstorm elements of the projectWrite each element on a self-stick note Draw a circle on a flipchart to indicate
project boundaries Place the notes either inside or outside
the circles boundaries to show whetherthe element is within the teams scopeor not
Review with the sponsor
-
8 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
New functionality
Redefine jobs
Use current technology
New IS platform
US vs. Metric
Adding personnel
IN SCOPE
IN-AND-OUT-OF-SCOPE
-
9 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
Project Planning ToolsProject plans often start with identifying keymilestones. Milestones represent important decision
points. The whole team should participate in de-
fining and establishing dates for milestones.There should be about 10-15 milestones.
Once milestones are defined, group theminto logical sequences.
Use tools such as GANTT Charts, ProgramEvaluation and Review Technique (PERT)Charts, or Network Diagrams to show therelationship between milestones.
In order to estimate the target date for each mile-stone, the team needs to: Estimate the tasks needed to reach each
milestone. Estimate the actual work time required for
each task. Estimate the resources available for each task. Take into account factors such as vacations,
personal time off, overtime required, learningcurve, meetings, and time for consensus.
Understand the relationships between thetasks needed to accomplish each milestone.
Use the above information to determine total dur-ation time for each task and the overall projecttimeline.
-
10 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
B2
B1
B4
B3
A2
A1
C1
C2
C3
PROJECT START
PROJECTOBJECTIVE
ResultPath
A
ResultPath
C
ResultPath
B
Network DiagramsNetwork Diagrams can be useful in helping the teamvisualize the relationships between milestones.
-
11 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
Work Breakdown StructureTo help map out detailed tasks, an activity schedulershould be used and take into consideration activitiessuch as: Work activities Control activities Commitment activities Communication activities Evaluation activities
-
12 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
ACTIVITY SCHEDULE
Lege
nd:
Actu
al c
ompl
etio
n da
teS
ched
uled
com
plet
ion
date
Ac
tiv
ity
Sc
he
du
leN
amed
Fun
ctio
ns/N
amed
Per
sons
Pro
ject
: Jad
eM
ilest
one
No.
/Nam
e: 5
T4
5V4
Cha
rt Is
sue
s/D
ate
: A-1
App
rove
d by
: TH
Per
iod
Leng
th: T
wo
Day
sT
arge
t Com
ple
tion:
30
Jun
X
Exec
utes
the
wor
k
D
Take
s de
cisi
on s
olel
yd
Ta
kes
deci
sion
join
tlyP
M
anag
es p
rogr
ess
T
Pro
vide
s tra
inin
g on
the
job
C
Mus
t be
cons
ulte
dI
M
ust b
e in
form
edA
Av
aila
ble
to a
dvis
e
Wor
k C
ont
Per
iod
Per
iod
No.
Act
ivity
/ Tas
k N
am
e
Leonard
Brian
Angela
David
Yolanda
Cla
rify
Ope
ratio
ns
Des
crib
e S
yste
m J
ade
I
Des
crib
e S
yste
m J
ade
II
Des
crib
e S
yste
m J
ade
III
Tra
nsla
te E
nglis
h/N
orw
egia
n
Iden
tify
Sys
. Fur
ies
I
Qua
ntify
Res
. Fur
ies
I
Iden
tify
Sys
. Co
mpa
ss I
Qua
ntify
Res
. Co
mpa
ss I
6 4 2 2 2 4 1 4 1
x
xC
CC
TC
xC
C
TC
xC
C
Cx
Tx
C
x
Tx
C
x
1920
2122
23/4
30/4
7/5
14/5
21/5
28/5
Frank
George
Alan
Lisa
Ac
tiv
ity
Sc
he
du
leN
amed
Fun
ctio
ns/N
amed
Per
sons
Pro
ject
: Jad
eM
ilest
one
No.
/Nam
e: 5
T4
5V4
Cha
rt Is
sue
s/D
ate
: A-1
AP
RA
ppro
ved
by: T
H
Per
iod
Leng
th: T
wo
Day
sT
arge
t Com
ple
tion:
30
Jun
X
Exec
utes
the
wor
k
D
Take
s de
cisi
on s
olel
yd
Ta
kes
deci
sion
join
tlyP
M
anag
es p
rogr
ess
T
Pro
vide
s tra
inin
g on
the
job
C
Mus
t be
cons
ulte
dI
M
ust b
e in
form
edA
Av
aila
ble
to a
dvis
e
Wor
k C
ont
No.
Leonard
Brian
Angela
David
Yolanda
Cla
rify
Ope
ratio
ns
Des
crib
e S
yste
m J
ade
I
Des
crib
e S
yste
m J
ade
II
Des
crib
e S
yste
m J
ade
III
Tra
nsla
te E
nglis
h/N
orw
egia
n
Iden
tify
Sys
. Fur
ies
I
Qua
ntify
Res
. Fur
ies
I
Iden
tify
Sys
. Co
mpa
ss I
Qua
ntify
Res
. Co
mpa
ss I
6 4 2 2 2 4 1 4 1
x
xC
CC
TC
xC
C
TC
xC
C
Cx
Tx
C
x
Tx
C
x
1920
2122
Frank
George
Alan
Lisa
Lege
nd:
Actu
al c
ompl
etio
n da
teS
ched
uled
com
plet
ion
date
Ac
tiv
ity
Sc
he
du
leN
amed
Fun
ctio
ns/N
amed
Per
sons
Pro
ject
: Jad
eM
ilest
one
No.
/Nam
e: 5
T4
5V4
Cha
rt Is
sue
s/D
ate
: A-1
App
rove
d by
: TH
Per
iod
Leng
th: T
wo
Day
sT
arge
t Com
ple
tion:
30
Jun
X
Exec
utes
the
wor
k
D
Take
s de
cisi
on s
olel
yd
Ta
kes
deci
sion
join
tlyP
M
anag
es p
rogr
ess
T
Pro
vide
s tra
inin
g on
the
job
C
Mus
t be
cons
ulte
dI
M
ust b
e in
form
edA
Av
aila
ble
to a
dvis
e
Wor
k C
ont
Per
iod
Per
iod
No.
Act
ivity
/ Tas
k N
am
e
Leonard
Brian
Angela
David
Yolanda
Cla
rify
Ope
ratio
ns
Des
crib
e S
yste
m J
ade
I
Des
crib
e S
yste
m J
ade
II
Des
crib
e S
yste
m J
ade
III
Tra
nsla
te E
nglis
h/N
orw
egia
n
Iden
tify
Sys
. Fur
ies
I
Qua
ntify
Res
. Fur
ies
I
Iden
tify
Sys
. Co
mpa
ss I
Qua
ntify
Res
. Co
mpa
ss I
6 4 2 2 2 4 1 4 1
x
xC
CC
TC
xC
C
TC
xC
C
Cx
Tx
C
x
Tx
C
x
1920
2122
23/4
30/4
7/5
14/5
21/5
28/5
Frank
George
Alan
Lisa
Ac
tiv
ity
Sc
he
du
leN
amed
Fun
ctio
ns/N
amed
Per
sons
Pro
ject
: Jad
eM
ilest
one
No.
/Nam
e: 5
T4
5V4
Cha
rt Is
sue
s/D
ate
: A-1
AP
RA
ppro
ved
by: T
H
Per
iod
Leng
th: T
wo
Day
sT
arge
t Com
ple
tion:
30
Jun
X
Exec
utes
the
wor
k
D
Take
s de
cisi
on s
olel
yd
Ta
kes
deci
sion
join
tlyP
M
anag
es p
rogr
ess
T
Pro
vide
s tra
inin
g on
the
job
C
Mus
t be
cons
ulte
dI
M
ust b
e in
form
edA
Av
aila
ble
to a
dvis
e
Wor
k C
ont
No.
Leonard
Brian
Angela
David
Yolanda
Cla
rify
Ope
ratio
ns
Des
crib
e S
yste
m J
ade
I
Des
crib
e S
yste
m J
ade
II
Des
crib
e S
yste
m J
ade
III
Tra
nsla
te E
nglis
h/N
orw
egia
n
Iden
tify
Sys
. Fur
ies
I
Qua
ntify
Res
. Fur
ies
I
Iden
tify
Sys
. Co
mpa
ss I
Qua
ntify
Res
. Co
mpa
ss I
6 4 2 2 2 4 1 4 1
x
xC
CC
TC
xC
C
TC
xC
C
Cx
Tx
C
x
Tx
C
x
1920
2122
Frank
George
Alan
Lisa
Frank
George
Alan
Lisa
-
13 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
GANTT ChartsGANTT Charts are useful in summarizing the flowof tasks across a timeline. Like the PERT chart, thesequencing of tasks is identified.
emaN
0002,4rt
Q1002,1
rtQ
1002,2rt
QQ
peStc
OvoN
ceDnaJ
beFra
MrpA
yaM
nuJluJ
sremots
sde
s'Q
stpecnoCpol w
-hgiHpol
ngiseDleve
7weiveR
ngiseD
8sliateD
poleveD
9noitalu
miS
01sisylanAtsoC
11weiveR
ngiseD
tnemer
noitatnem
-
14 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
PERT ChartsPERT Charts display tasks and task dependenciesas a flowchart. A box (sometimes called a node)represents each task and a line connecting twoboxes represents the dependency between thetwo tasks. This tool helps to identify the sequenceor parallel tasks.
Proj
ect
Star
tID
C
usto
mer
sID
Nee
dsD
evel
op
CTQ
sD
evel
op
Con
cept
sR
evie
wD
evel
op
Hig
h Le
vel
Des
ign
Des
ign
Rev
iew
Impl
emen
tatio
n
Proc
urem
ent
Dev
elop
Det
ails
Des
ign
Rev
iew
Sim
ulat
ion
Cos
t Ana
lysi
s
-
15 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
Stakeholder AnalysisStakeholder analysis is the proactive process ofidentifying, understanding, supporting and influenc-ing key individuals or groups to increase theirreadiness to carry out organizational initiatives and,thus, to facilitate the ultimate success of theseinitiatives.
Stakeholder analysis is important because it canhelp: Gain buy-in and consensus required to make
implementation of improvement initiativessuccessful;
Establish sponsorship and support networks,and then leverage these as solutions areimplemented;
Lay the groundwork, if done early enough inthe project life cycle, for managing inevitableresistance encountered during implementa-tion;
Minimize the impact of resistance by prepar-ing key stakeholders;
Understand the communication needs (email,voicemail, meeting involvement, one-on-oneupdates, etc.) of each stakeholder and developa communication plan (including frequency ofupdates) to ensure each stakeholder is gettingthe right amount of information during theproject.
-
16 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
Steps:1. Plot where individuals currently are with
regard to desired change (y = current).2. Plot where individuals need to be (X = desired)
in order to successfully accomplish desiredchange identify gaps between current anddesired.
3. Indicate how individuals are linked to eachother, draw lines to indicate an influence linkusing an arrow ( ) to indicate who influenceswhom.
4. Plan action steps for closing gaps.
semaN ylgnotS tsniagAyletaredoM
tsniagA lartueNyletaredoMevitroppuS
ylgnortSevitroppuS
EXAMPLE OF STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
-
17 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
Communication PlanA communication strategy or plan is a proactiveprocess of identifying, planning and deliveringstrategic communications designed to address theunique information needs of different audiences(stakeholders). It is another means of buildingcommitment to change by increasing awareness andproviding relevant information.
The stakeholder analysis and communication plansare iterative processes to be refined throughout theproject life.
-
18 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
Project Risk
It is important to manage potential risksduring the project
At the end of each step, plan time to assesspotential risks to the projects success:
Identify potential problems
Determine the likelihood of theiroccurrence
Take steps to avoid or deal with the likelyproblems
Yellow light:Proceed withcaution
Red light:Address beforeproceeding
Red light:Do not Proceed
Red light:Reassessproject
Green light
Low
M
edi
um
H
igh
Pro
babi
lity
of O
ccu
rren
ce
Impact on Project
Yellow light:Proceed withcaution
Yellow light:Proceed withcaution
Yellow light:Proceed withcaution
Red light:Address beforeproceeding
-
19 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
Review of Define Phase
At the end of the DEFINE Phase, the following arein place: Properly chartered project and business case Plan for next generation products/process/
technology platforms Project plans Project risks are identified, assessed, and
addressed Stakeholders are clearly defined and priori-
tized
Deliverables for the DEFINE Phase include: Aligned team project charter Multi-generational plan Project milestone plan Project risk assessment plus mitigation plan Stakeholder assessment and communication
plan Project risk analysis
-
20 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
Design ReviewThe organization and independent reviewerscheck and agree that Product/Service, Process,and Supply chain are ready for rollout. The reviewteam agrees on the Launch strategy. Where app-licable within Johnson & Johnson, a decision aboutreadiness to file to regulatory bodies must also bemade. Typically, while the regulatory authoritiesreview the file, the product/service/process teamgets ready for launch.
Design ReviewsA design review is a process for objectivelyevaluating the quality of a design at variousstages of the design process.
It provides the opportunity for voices external tothe design team, including customers, to providefeedback on the design, as the product and serviceis being developed.
A well-conducted design review helps to ensurethat the design will satisfy customers, and that thedesign process will function effectively to producea high quality product or service. Design Reviewsshould focus on both effectiveness and efficiencyof the design process. This will ensure that cust-omer requirements are well addressed withoutleading to any potential cost-related conflicts.
-
21 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
Formal design reviews: These are reviews forwhich companies have well-established proce-dures that are part of the project plan for everyproject. They involve external (to the organization,company, or design team depending on thecircumstances) feedback, the results of which areconsistently and systematically reported in thedesign documentation.
Informal design reviews: These are typicallyinternal reviews conducted regularly or as neededto ensure that the project is on target and toresolve specific technical and coordination issues.
Design reviews need to be conducted at eachstage of the design process. The rule of thumb is toorganize a design review whenever externalfeedback appears appropriate or when there arecoordination issues. (Also, the design reviewprocess is cyclic, and multiple design reviews maybe needed at each stage of the design process.)
-
22 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER ONE DEFINE
This page intentionally left blank.
-
23 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
II. MEASURE Requirements
Introduction
The MEASURE Phase includes: Identifying quantified requirements to provide
the team the goals they will shoot for toproduce a competitive product, service, orprocess.
Identifying Critical-to-Quality Requirements(CTQs) that are most important to achieve inthe design.
Ensuring these requirements are linked tocustomer needs and in tune with the competi-tive environment.
Creating scorecards to ensure that CTQs areattained during further development.
-
24 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
II.1 Gather Voice of the Customer (VOC)and Competitive Information
Voice of the CustomerVoice of the customer, the foundation for projectssuccess, is used to identify and quantify customers needsand their perception of your product or service. TheVOC is critical to an organization to identify andquantify:
Which products and services to offer Critical features and specifications for products
and services Baseline measures of customer satisfaction Key drivers of customer satisfaction
IDENTIFYING CUSTOMERS Identify external and internal customers (SIPOC) Customers should be segmented or grouped
according to their similar needs for products/services/processes
Businesses should focus products/services/processes on the customer segment(s) they havechosen to achieve their business strategies
Businesses should choose their customer segmentsbased upon the businesses capability to serveexisting customer needs profitably today, tomor-row, and in the future, as well as upon the busi-nesses ability to develop the capability to servepotential/new customer needs
-
25 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
1.Identify
customersand
determinewhat you
need to know
2.Collect and
analyzereactive
system datathen fill gaps
with proactive
approaches
3.Analyzedata to
generate akey list ofcustomerneeds in
theirlanguage
Often a design team will focus only on the ulti-mate customer of the process or service. Somebroader customer groups to consider include:
Government Regulatory agencies Internal departments Intermediary external customers
The design teams composition should includerepresentatives (or permanent members or guests) ofinternal departments who are stakeholders (e.g.,human resources, legal, etc.).
-
26 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
Economic Frequency Size of Customer Cost Revenue
Descriptive Geographic Demographic Service Feature Channel
Attitudinal Price Value Service
WAYS TO SEGMENT CUSTOMERS
Co-op Other
FranchiseF
elyPrivateheld
Publiclyubliclyheld
Soleproprietor
REVENUE
Num
ber o
f Cus
tom
ers
Month
Price
Service
PRICE & SERVICE
-
27 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
1.Identify
customersand
determinewhat you
need to know
2.Collect and
analyzereactive
system datathen fill gaps
with proactive
approaches
3.Analyzedata to
generate akey list ofcustomerneeds in
theirlanguage
Your process or service is viewed by the customerfrom many different angles.
There are two basic types of VOC systems, ReactiveSystems (Information comes to you whether you takeaction or notinitiated by customer in the form ofcomplaints, returns, sales, etc.) and ProactiveSystems (You need to put effort into gathering theinformationinitiated by the business in form ofcustomer surveys and market research).
Existing or readily available customer information isoften mistakenly overlooked. We have a responsibil-ity to our customers to first understand, analyze andact on the information they have already beenproviding before we solicit more information fromthem. This existing information is often called aReactive VOC since it comes unsolicited from the
-
28 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
customer. By studying the reactive data along withalready existing research we can optimize our timewith the customer.
Consider these components or dimensions ofquality in planning the type of customer informa-tion you will need to gather as part of customerresearch.
Additional sources of relevant customer/industryinformation are likely available. Some possibleinformation you may have can be found on the nextpage.
QUALITYFocus on the benefits, functions/useprovided by the product/service/process
COSTFocus on how much the benefits costthe customer
DELIVERYFocus on the timeliness or quantity of the benefits
SERVICE/SAFETY
Focus on after sales service, notinjuring the customer
CORPORATERESPONSIBILITY
Focus on legal, regulatory, orenvironmental needs
-
29 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
lo
oTg
ninetsiL
noita
mrof
nIfo
epyT:
otg
ninetsiL
rof
elbatiuS
evitatilauQ
evitatitna
uQsla
udividnI
pu
orGlla
mSp
uor
GegraL
)R(gnir
otino
Mr
etneC
ecivr
eS/retn
eCllaCX
X)R(
stcatnoClausaC
XX
)P(tne
merus
eMtni
ojnoC
XX
X)R(
sw
ohSedarT
dnasn
oitne
vnoC
XX
X)R(
noitaula
vEtnedicnIlacitirC
XX
X)P(
slenaP
re
motsuC
XX
X)R(tiduA
ecivr
eSr
em
otsuCX
X)P(
spuor
Gsuc
oFX
X)R(
gnirotin
oM
noitacinu
mm
oCdnu
obnIX
X)P(
hcraes
eRe
vitcaretnI
XX
X)P(
sw
eivr
etnIX
XX
)P(stiduA
repp
ohSyr
etsyM
XX
X)P(tn
emn
orivnE
dell
ortnoC
:hcraes
eRn
oitavr
esbO
XX
)P(tne
mnori
vnElarutaN:hcra
eseR
noita
vresb
OX
XX
)R(gnir
otino
Msn
oitacinum
moC
dnuobtu
OX
XX
)R(sn
oitartsigeR
ecivr
eS/tcudorP
XX
XX
)P(sl
enaPtne
mgeS
XX
)P(tne
merusa
eM
ytivitisn
eSX
X)P(
spohskr
oW
elcyCeci
vreS
XX
)P(kcabllaC
enohp
eleT
deta
motuA
-sy
evruS
XX
)P(sn
oisseS
puor
G-
sye
vruSX
X)P(
sw
eivr
etnIn
osrep
-nI-
sye
vruSX
X)P(lia
M-
sye
vruSX
X)P(
ecivr
eS/elaSf
otnioP
-sy
evruS
XX
)P(en
ohpel
eT-
sye
vruSX
X)P(
hcraes
eReulaV
XX
X
ADDITIONAL SOURCES OF INFORMATION
P =
Pro
acti
ve T
ool,
i.e.,
you
init
iate
the
info
rmat
ion
requ
est
R =
Rea
ctiv
e T
ool,
i.e.,
the
info
rmat
ion
com
es to
you
whe
ther
you
take
act
ion
or n
ot
Not
e: T
he
P
or
R
des
igna
tion
ind
icat
es th
e p
rim
ary
use
of t
he to
ol.
-
30 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
Three most common methods for gathering proactivecustomer data are interviews, focus groups, andsurveys. In most cases, tools need to be used incombination.
Tools, used in combination, move you from onelevel of certainty to the next.
All tools need to move you towards greater
certainty - uncertain certain more certain. Theissues for selection include:
How much certainty do you need? How much certainty can you afford? How much uncertainty can you risk?
Telephone interviews to
identify baseline issues and opinions
Focus groups to obtain deeper understanding
Survey to verifyand quantify
-
31 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
InterviewsPurposes of using interviews are to learn about aspecific customers point of view on issues, at-tributes, and performance indicators/measures.
The different types of interviews are:
fosepyTsweivretnI
dedeeNnoitamrofnIfoscitsiretcarahC
laudividnIsevitcepsrepeuqinU
noitapicitraplevel-roineSremotsucemulov-egralmorftupnI
puorG
ralimishtiwsremotsucmorfnoitamrofnIsdeenecivres
noitapicitraplevel-rewolot-diMamorfelpoepynammorfnoitamrofnI
tnemgeselgnis
/enohpeleTliam
ylediweraohwsremotsucmorftupnIyllacihpargoegdesrepsid
seussielpmisrocisabnonoitamrofnInoitcellocnoitamrofnifodnuoranrutkciuQ
Advantages: Flexibility: Able to obtain more detailed
explanations; can probe and clarify Greater complexity: Able to administer
highly complex questionnaires/surveys; canexplain questions to interviewee
-
32 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
Able to reach all population types: Able tointerview populations that are difficult orimpossible to reach by other methods
High response rate: Degree to whichinformation collection process reaches alltargets is higher
Assurance that instructions are followedDisadvantages:
High cost: Process of administering is costly Interviewer bias: The least reliable form of
data collection the interviewer mayinfluence the responses to the questionnaire
Less anonymity Limit to 15-20 minutes (business-to-business
45-50 minutes) Difficult to analyze or to generate supportable
quantitative evidence Sample size may not be sufficient to draw
supportable conclusions Positive response bias (people give higher
ratings in personal interviews)
TIP: Interviews are generally used to gather
qualitative information. If your need is forquantitative data, gather information throughwell-designed surveys.
-
33 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
Focus GroupsFocus groups, lead by a moderator, are typicallycomposed of 7 to 13 participants who share charac-teristics that relate to the focus group topic. Aminimum of three focus groups are conducted askingparticipants to thoroughly discuss a limited numberof topics and are two to four hours in duration.
Use Focus Groups When: You need to make or confirm market segmen-
tation decisions Hypotheses about the market and customer
values need to be developed or tested inexploratory or preliminary studies
A communication gap appears to exist betweenyour company and the market segment
Insight is needed into complicated topicswhere opinions and attitudes are conditional
Synergy among individuals would be useful increating ideas
Hypotheses need to be developed in prepara-tion for a broad survey or large scale study
A higher value is placed on capturing open-ended comments than data from the targetaudience
Do Not Use Focus Groups When: The environment is emotionally charged and
more information of any type is likely tointensify the conflict
-
34 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
Highly valid quantitative data is needed Other methodologies can produce either better
quality or more economical information Selling services
Steps for conducting a focus group include:
1. Plan the focus group session: Determine why you are conducting the study Determine who the participants should be Write the research questions keep the list
short Draft the structure and flow of the session Select focus group location and schedule
groups Develop a plan and estimate resources needed Test the questions Finalize the questions and the flow of the
session
2. Lead the focus group
3. Analyze the focus group findings
-
35 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
SurveysSurveys are used to measure the importance andsatisfaction/perception of performance against anattribute or customer characteristic. Some of thedifferent types of surveys are listed in the table onthe following page.
The wording and question format must be chosenwith care. Wording of the questions should:
Use simple words Avoid ambiguous words or questions Avoid biased or leading questions Avoid generalizations and estimates Avoid double-barreled questions
Types of question formats include: open-ended questions multichotomous (fixed alternative) questions dichotomous questions (Yes or No) scales matrix
The order in which questions are presented can becrucial to the success of the data collection effort andtherefore, the success of the benchmarking effort.
The questionnaire should have a logical order.Sudden changes in topics or jumping aroundfrom topic to topic should be avoided. Thegeneral order of issues in the questionnaireshould mimic the outline of the final report.
-
36 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
Use simple, interesting, and nonthreateningopening questions. The first few questionsmay determine whether respondents decide ifthey will even participate in the study. Ifrespondents cannot answer the first questionseasily or find them threatening in any way,they may refuse to look at the rest of thequestionnaire.
Use the funnel approach. The funnel approachstarts with broad questions and progressivelynarrows down the scope as necessary.
Design branching questions with care.Branching questions direct respondents todifferent places in the questionnaire based ontheir response to the question at hand. (Forexample If you answered no, go to question17.) These types of questions are moreeffective in a telephone or in-person interviewas they may appear cumbersome or confusingto those responding via the mail.
Ask for classification information last. Place difficult or sensitive questions through-
out the questionnaire. Involvement lessens theprobability of negative actions.
It is useful to first pilot the survey with a group ofpeople who are not part of the project. Their feed-back provides important information on the clarityof the questions as well as the delivery mode.
-
37 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
DIF
FER
ENT
TYPE
S O
F SU
RVE
YS A
ND
TH
EIR
EFF
ECTI
VEN
ESS
citsiretcarahClia
Me
nohPweivret
nI
enohP
detamot
uAkcaBllaC
reweivret
nIderetsi
nimdA
puorG
snoisseSnettir
Wci
nortcelE
stsocnoitcelloc
ataDw
oLetar
edo
Metar
edo
MhgiH
etared
oM
woL
tcellocot
deriuqer
emiTatad
hgiHw
oLmuid
eM
hgiHmuid
eM
woL
atades
nopseRetar
edo
MhgiH
etared
oM
hgiHhgiH
hgiH
saibre
weivretnI
enoN
etared
oM
enoN
hgiHw
oLen
oN
fohtg
nelelbatpeccA
yevrus
gnoL
trohS
mumixa
m(51
)setuni
m
muide
Mot
muide
Mgn
oLgn
oLtr
ohS01
-5(
)setuni
m
-nepo
niatboot
ytilibAses
nopserded
new
oLw
oLw
oLhgiH
hgiHmuid
eM
ytimy
nona
deviecrePhgiH
woL
hgiHw
oLetar
edo
Men
oN
-
38 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
Affinity DiagramsAn affinity diagram is a good tool to organizelanguage data into related groups. Unlike other datatools, the creation of an affinity diagram stressescreative or intuitive thinking more than logicalthinking.
The affinity diagram is used when analyzingqualitative customer data, dealing with complexproblems or issues or organizing ideas, issues, andopinions.
1. Gather ideas from interview transcripts, surveys, etc.
Read through your customer notes Highlight statements you think are related to
customer needs The need statements used for an affinity
diagram should be in the customers ownlanguage if at all possible
2. Transfer data onto index cards or self-stick notes Transcribe the strongest of these statements to
cards or self-stick notes you can use for theaffinity diagram
One sentence per card Try to identify positive statements turn I
dont want X into I want Y
3. Group the cards to find the affinity Shuffle the cards and lay them out, or ran-
domly place self-stick notes on flipchart
-
39 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
Theme 2
Need 3 Need 4
Need 5
Need 6
Need 7
Title notes identifythemes
OK to haveclusters ofone note
Can be severallayers ofclustering
Theme 2
Need 3 Need 4
Need 5
Need 6
Need 7
Title notes identifythemes
Theme 1
Need 1 Need 2 Theme 3
Statements written onindividual cards or notes Notes are clustered
based on intuition, notlogic
Theme 1
Need 1 Need 2 Theme 3
Statements written onindividual cards or notes Notes are clustered
based on intuition, notlogic
OK to haveclusters ofone note
Can be severallayers ofclustering
Theme 2
Need 3 Need 4
Need 5
Need 6
Need 7
Title notes identifythemes
OK to haveclusters ofone note
Can be severallayers ofclustering
Theme 2
Need 3 Need 4
Need 5
Need 6
Need 7
Theme 1
Need 1 Need 2 Theme 3
Statements written onindividual cards or notes Notes are clustered
based on intuition, notlogic
Theme 1
Need 1 Need 2 Theme 3
Statements written onindividual cards or notes Notes are clustered
based on intuition, notlogic
Theme 1
Need 1 Need 2 Theme 3
Statements written onindividual cards or notes Notes are clustered
based on intuition, notlogic
Theme 1
Need 1 Need 2 Theme 3
Statements written onindividual cards or notes Notes are clustered
based on intuition, notlogic
Theme 1
Need 1 Need 2 Theme 3
Statements written onindividual cards or notes Notes are clustered
based on intuition, notlogic
Theme 1
Need 1 Need 2 Theme 3
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
Read each card or note slowly two or threetimes to yourself
Group cards that seem to fit together~ similar based on feeling and pre-logic
(right brain sorting)~ let the cards group themselves
4. Label the groups of cards5. Optional: group the clusters6. Draw the diagram The data can now be taken into a structure tree
or CTQ Tree
-
40 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
Kano AnalysisMethod of understanding that product/service/process characteristics relate to different types ofcustomer needs. This model of quality was devel-oped by Dr. Noriaki Kano, one of the most promi-nent figures in Japans quality movement. Heoutlines three basic types of customer reactions toquality features or characteristics.
Must-Be: For any process or product/service,certain features or characteristics must bepresent or the customer will be frustrated orangry. For instance, when you buy a shirt, youexpect it to have all its buttons. As indicated bythe line on the diagram, the absence of a Must-Be feature will disappoint or anger us, but itspresence can only bring us up to neutral.
More is Better: Customers view other featuresor characteristics as more is better. A small,skimpy towel in a hotel room might bedisappointing, while a larger, luxurious towelmight be delightful. However, there areusually limits. For instance, wed have troubleusing a towel the size of a bedspread.
Delighters: Special features or characteristicsthat the customer doesnt expect, but findsuseful when present, are called delighters.The more unexpected and more useful afeature, the more likely it is to create truedelight. Finding a coffee maker and cable TV
-
41 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
with free movie channels in a budget hotelroom, for instance, might delight us.
Customer perceptions are a moving target. Some-thing that starts off as a Delighter can soon become aMust-Be (such as remote controls for TVs and VCRs).
TIPS Customers generally only mention More is
Better issues. Must-Bes are generally more important to
them, even though they are taken for granted.Do not omit these Must-Bes from the design.
The importance of Delighters is generallyguessed at based on expert knowledge fromthe marketplace, since customers seldommention needs they dont know can befulfilled.
Dont expect that you will get Must-Bes fromthe regular VOC. Must-Bes are generallyunspoken and need to be uncovered throughspecial research, i.e., complaint data, regula-tions, etc.
Use for trade-offs, prioritization. Focus first on the must-bes and, more
importantly more is better
-
42 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
KANO ANALYSIS
Delighters
More
Is Be
tter
Must Be
Delight
Neutral
Dissatisfaction
Custo
mer
Satis
fac
tion
Degree ofAchievement
FulfilledAbsent
PleasedResignedto Reality
Taken forGranted
NotPleased
-
43 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
1.Identify
customersand
determinewhat you
need to know
2.Collect and
analyzereactive
system datathen fill gaps
with proactive
approaches
3.Analyzedata to
generate akey list ofcustomerneeds in
theirlanguage
IDENTIFY KEY CUSTOMER ISSUES1. Group similar and common statements
received from customers. Select or adjustcomments from each group to form a singlestatement which best represents the VOC.
2. Based on clarification gathered throughVOC, state the key customer issue (con-cerns, values or expectations) associatedwith each VOC statement.
3. Clarify, in measurable and specific terms, thecustomer requirement(s) associated with thekey customer issues.
4. In gathering the VOC, steer customers awayfrom solutions; keep them focused on needsand wants. This will prevent the design teamfrom prematurely locking into one or twoideas.
CTQ (Critical to Quality)A design CTQ is a quantifiable (and measurable)characteristic of the product/process/service forwhich targets, allowable variation, and allowabledefect rates (sigma levels) can be established.
-
44 Johnson & Johnson 2005
CHAPTER TWO MEASURE
CTQ
TR
EEVoic
e of
the
Cus
tom
erK
ey C
usto
mer
Issu
eC
ritic
al to
Qua
lity
Req
uire
men
t
Actu
al c
usto
mer
sta
tem
ents
and
com
men
ts w
hich
refle
ct th
eir
perc
eptio
n of
:
An a
ttrib
ute
of a
pro
cess
or
serv
ice
An e
xper
ience
with
a p
roce
ss o
f se
rvice
or i
ts de
liver
y
An e
ncou
nter
or e
xper
ienc
e with
a
busi
ness
pro
cess
es o
r re
pres
enta
tive
This
mow
er s
houl
d be
eas
y to
star
tT
he c
ord
shou
ldn
t be
too
hard
to
pull.
I w
ant t
o ta
lk to
the
right
per
son
and
don
t wan
t to
wai
t on
hold
too
long
.
This
pac
kage
doe
snt
do s
quat
The
real
cust
omer
con
cern
s, v
alue
s or
exp
ecta
tions
rega
rding
a p
rodu
ct
or s
ervi
ce.
Void
of e
mot
ion
or b
ias,
the
stat
emen
t des
cribe
s th
e pr
imar
y is
sue
a cus
tomer
may
hav
e w
ith th
e pr
oduc
t or s
ervic
es.
Desc
ribes
the
expe
rienc
e su
rroun
ding
the
attri
bute
s of
the
prod
uct o
r ser
vice
exp
ecte
d or
de
sire
d by
the
cust
omer
.
Wan
ts th
e m
ower
to s
tart
quick
ly an
d pa
inle
ssly
Wan
ts to
talk
to th
e rig
ht p
erso
n qu
ickly
The
softw
are
does
wha
t the
ven
dor
said
it wou
ld d
o.
The
spec
ific, p
reci
se a
nd m
easu
rabl
e ch
arac
teris
tic o
f the
pro
cess
or s
ervi
ce
M
ower
sta
rts w
ithin
two
pulls
on
the
cord
M
ower
sta
rts w
ith a
n ef
fortl
ess
pull
on th
e co
rd n
ot e
xcee
ding
24
in
leng
th
Ad
d ad
ditio
nal m
enu
item
s to
the
voice
syst
em (b
ad)
C
usto
mer
reac
hes
corre
ct p
erso
n th
e fir
st ti
me w
ithin
30 s
econ
ds
(goo
d)
Ev
ery
desig
n fe
atur
e ne
eded
is
built
into
the
pack
age
Th
e so
ftwar
e is
fully
ope
ratio
nal
on th
e cu
stom
ers
exist
ing
syst
em
Voic
e of
the
Cus
tom
erK
ey C
usto
mer
Issu
e
Actu
al c
usto
mer
sta
tem
ents
and
com
men
ts w
hich
refle
ct th
eir
perc
eptio
n of
:
An a
ttrib
ute
of a
pro
cess
or
serv
ice
An e
xper
ience
with
a p
roce
ss o
f se
rvice
or i
ts de
liver
y
An e
ncou
nter
or e
xper
ienc
e with
a
busi
ness
pro
cess
es o
r re
pres
enta
tive
This
mow
er s
houl
d be
eas
y to
star
tT
he c
ord
shou
ldn
t be
too
hard
to
pull.
I w
ant t
o ta
lk to
the
right
per
son
and
don
t wan
t to
wai
t on
hold
too
long
.
This
pac
kage
doe
snt
do s
quat
Actu
al c
usto
mer
sta
tem
ents
and
com
men
ts w
hich
refle
ct th
eir
perc
eptio
n of
:
An a
ttrib
ute
of a
pro
cess
or
serv
ice
An e
xper
ience
with
a p
roce
ss o
rse
rvice
or i
ts de
liver
y
An e
ncou
nter
or e
xper
ienc
e with
a
busi
ness
pro
cess
or
repr
esen
tativ
e
This
mow
er s
houl
d be
eas
y to
star
t.T
he c
ord
shou
ldn
t be
too
hard
to
pull.
I w
ant t
o ta
lk to
the
right
per
son
and
don
t wan
t to
wai
t on
hold
too
long
.
This
pac
kage
doe
snt
do s
quat
.
The
real
cust
omer
con
cern
s, v
alue
s or
exp
ecta
tions
rega
rding
a p
rodu
ct
or s
ervi
ce.
Void
of e
mot
ion
or b
ias,
the
stat
emen
t des
cribe
s th
e pr
imar
y is
sue
a cus
tomer
may
hav
e w
ith th
e pr
oduc
t or s
ervic
es.
Desc
ribes
the
expe
rienc
e su
rroun
ding
the
attri
bute
s of
the
prod
uct o
r ser
vice
exp
ecte
d or
de
sire
d by
the
cust
omer
.
Wan
ts th
e m
ower
to s
tart
quick
ly an
d pa
inle
ssly
Wan
ts to
talk
to th
e rig
ht p
erso
n qu
ickly
The
softw
are
does
wha
t the
ven
dor
said
it wou
ld d
o.
The
real
cust
omer
con
cern
s, v
alue
s or
exp
ecta
tions
rega
rding
a p
rodu
ct
or s
ervi
ce.
Void
of e
mot
ion
or b
ias,
the
stat
emen
t des
cribe
s th
e pr
imar
y is
sue
a cus
tomer
may
hav
e w
ith th
e pr
oduc
t or s
ervic
e.De
scrib
es th
e ex
perie
nce
surro
undi
ng th
e at
tribu
tes
of th
e pr
oduc
t or s
ervi
ce e
xpec
ted
or
desi
red
by th
e cu
stom
er.
Wan
ts th
e m
ower
to s
tart
quick
ly an
d pa
inle
ssly.
Wan
ts to
talk
to th
e rig
ht p
erso
n qu
ickly.
The
softw
are
does
wha
t the
ven
dor
said
it wou
ld d
o.
The
spec
ific, p
reci
se a
nd m
easu
rabl
e ch
arac
teris
tic o
f the
pro
cess
or s
ervi
ce
M
ower
sta
rts w
ithin
two
pulls
on
the
cord
M
ower
sta
rts w
ith a
n ef
fortl
ess
pull
on th
e co
rd n
ot e
xcee
ding
24
in
leng
th
Ad
d ad
ditio
nal m
enu
item
s to
the
voice
syst
em (b
ad)
C
usto
mer
reac
hes
corre
ct p
erso
n th
e fir
st ti
me w
ithin
30 s
econ
ds
(goo
d)
Ev
ery
desig
n fe
atur
e ne
eded
is
built
into
the
pack
age
Th
e so
ftwar
e is
fully
ope
ratio
nal
on th
e cu
stom
ers
exist
ing
syst
em
The
spec
ific, p
reci
se a
nd m
easu
rabl
e ch
arac
teris
tic o
f the
pro
cess
or s
ervi
ce
M
ower
sta
rts w
ithin
two
pulls
on
the
cord
M
ower
sta
rts w
ith a
n ef
fortl
ess
pull
on th
e co
rd n
ot e
xcee
ding
24
in
leng
th
Ad
d ad
ditio
nal m
enu
item
s to
the
voice
syst
em (b
ad)
C
usto
mer
reac
hes
corre
ct p
erso
n th
e fir
st ti
me w
ithin
30 s
econ
ds
(goo
d)
Ev
ery
desig
n fe
atur
e ne
eded
is
built
into
the
pack
age
Th
e so
ftwar
e is
fully
ope
ratio
nal
on th
e cu
stom
ers
exist
ing
syst
em
Voic
e of
the
Cus
tom
erK
ey C
usto
mer
Issu
eC
ritic
al to
Qua
lity
Req
uire
men
t
Actu
al c
usto
mer
sta
tem
ents
and
com
men
ts w
hich
refle
ct th
eir
perc
eptio
n of
:
An a
ttrib
ute
of a
pro
cess
or
serv
ice
An e
xper
ience
with
a p
roce
ss o
f se
rvice
or i
ts de
liver
y
An e
ncou
nter
or e
xper
ienc
e with
a
busi
ness
pro
cess
es o
r re
pres
enta
tive
This
mow
er s
houl
d be
eas
y to
star
tT
he c
ord
shou
ldn
t be
too
hard
to
pull.
I w
ant t
o ta
lk to
the
right
per
son
and
don
t wan
t to
wai
t on
hold
too
long
.
This
pac
kage
doe
snt
do s
quat
Actu
al c
usto
mer
sta
tem
ents
and
com
men
ts w
hich
refle
ct th
eir
perc
eptio
n of
:
An a
ttrib
ute
of a
pro
cess
or
serv
ice
An e
xper
ience
with
a p
roce
ss o
f se
rvice
or i
ts de
liver
y
An e
ncou
nter
or e
xper
ienc
e with
a
busi
ness
pro
cess
es o
r re
pres
enta
tive
This
mow
er s
houl
d be
eas
y to
star
tT
he c
ord
shou
ldn
t be
too
hard
to
pull.
I w
ant t
o ta
lk to
the
right
per
son
and
don
t wan
t to
wai
t on
hold
too
long
.
This
pac
kage
doe
snt
do s
quat
The
real
cust
omer
con
cern
s, v
alue
s or
exp
ecta
tions
rega
rding
a p
rodu
ct
or s
ervi
ce.
Void
of e
mot
ion
or b
ias,
the
stat
emen
t des
cribe
s th
e pr
imar
y is
sue
a cus
tomer
may
hav
e w
ith th
e pr
oduc
t or s
ervic
es.
Desc
ribes
the
expe
rienc
e su
rroun
ding
the
attri
bute
s of
the
prod
uct o
r ser
vice
exp
ecte
d or
de
sire
d by
the
cust
omer
.
Wan
ts th
e m
ower
to s
tart
quick
ly an
d pa
inle
ssly
Wan
ts to
talk
to th
e rig
ht p
erso
n qu
ickly
The
softw
are
does
wha
t the
ven
dor
said
it wou
ld d
o.
The
real
cust
omer
con
cern
s, v
alue
s or
exp
ecta
tions
rega
rding
a p
rodu
ct
or s
ervi
ce.
Void
of e
mot
ion
or b
ias,
the
stat
emen
t des
cribe
s th
e pr
imar
y is
sue
a cus
tomer
may
hav
e w
ith th
e pr
oduc
t or s
ervic
es.
Desc
ribes
the
expe
rienc
e su
rroun
ding
the
attri
bute
s of
the
prod
uct o
r ser
vice
exp
ecte
d or
de
sire
d by
the
cust
omer
.
Wan
ts th
e m
ower
to s
tart
quick
ly an
d pa
inle
ssly
Wan
ts to
talk
to th
e rig
ht p
erso
n qu
ickly
The
softw
are
does
wha
t the
ven
dor
said
it wou
ld d
o.
The
spec
ific, p
reci
se a
nd m
easu
rabl
e ch
arac
teris
tic o
f the
pro
cess
or s
ervi
ce
M
ower
sta
rts w
ithin
two
pulls
on
the
cord
M
ower
sta
rts w
ith a
n ef
fortl
ess
pull
on th
e co
rd n
ot e
xcee
ding
24
in
leng
th
Ad
d ad
ditio
nal m
enu
item
s to
the
voice
syst
em (b
ad)
C
usto
mer
reac
hes
corre
ct p
erso
n th
e fir
st ti
me w
ithin
30 s
econ
ds
(goo
d)
Ev
ery
desig
n fe
atur
e ne
eded
is
built
into
the
pack
age
Th
e so
ftwar
e is
fully
ope
ratio
nal
on th
e cu
stom
ers
exist
ing
syst
em
The
spec
ific, p
reci
se a
nd m
easu
rabl
e ch
arac
teris
tic o
f the
pro
cess
or s
ervi
ce
M
ower
sta
rts w
ithin
two
pulls
on
the
cord
M
ower
sta
rts w
ith a
n ef
fortl
ess
pull
on th
e co
rd n
ot e
xcee
ding
24
in
leng
th
Ad
d ad
ditio
nal m
enu
item
s to
the
voice
syst
em (b
ad)
C
usto
mer
reac
hes
corre
ct p
erso
n th
e fir
st ti
me w
ithin
30 s
econ
ds
(goo
d)
Ev
ery
desig
n fe
atur
e ne
eded
is
built
into
the
pack
age
Th
e so
ftwar
e is
fully
ope
ratio
nal
on th
e cu
stom
ers
exist
ing
syst
em
Voic
e of
the
Cus
tom
erK
ey C
usto
mer
Issu
e
Actu
al c
usto
mer
sta
tem
ents
and
com
men
ts w
hich
refle
ct th
eir
perc
eptio
n of
:
An a
ttrib
ute
of a
pro
cess
or
serv
ice
An e
xper
ience
with
a p
roce
ss o
f se
rvice
or i
ts de
liver
y
An e
ncou
nter
or e
xper
ienc
e with
a
busi
ness
pro
cess
es o
r re
pres
enta
tive
This
mow
er s
houl
d be
eas
y to
star
tT
he c
ord
shou
ldn
t be
too
hard
to
pull.
I w
ant t
o ta
lk to
the
right
per
son
and
don
t wan
t to
wai
t on
hold
too
long
.
This
pac
kage
doe
snt
do s
quat
Actu
al c
usto
mer
sta
tem
ents
and
com
men
ts w
hich
refle
ct th
eir
perc
eptio
n of
:
An a
ttrib
ute
of a
pro
cess
or
serv
ice
An e
xper
ience
with
a p
roce
ss o
rse
rvice
or i
ts de
liver
y
An e
ncou
nter
or e
xper
ienc
e with
a
busi
ness
pro
cess
or
repr
esen
tativ
e
This
mow
er s
houl
d be
eas
y to
star
t.T
he c
ord
shou
ldn
t be
too
hard
to
pull.
I w
ant t
o ta
lk to
the
right
per
son
and
don
t wan
t to
wai
t on
hold
too
long
.
This
pac
kage
doe
snt
do s
quat
.
The
real
cust
omer
con
cern
s, v
alue
s or
exp
ecta
tions
rega
rding
a p
rodu
ct
or s
ervi
ce.
Void
of e
mot
ion
or b
ias,
the
stat
emen
t des
cribe
s th
e pr
imar
y is
sue
a cus
tomer
may
hav
e w
ith th
e pr
oduc
t