delivering sustainable residential development

Aston University Conference Wednesday 14th March 2001

Delivering Sustainable Residential.Developments

Andreas Markides and Chris Pyatt, Directors Colin Buchanan and Partners


3, 47:PPG paragraph

“ Local planning authorities should therefore seek to exploit opportunities to locate largerhousing

developments around majornodes along good quality public transport corridors and seek to ensure that all

-housing developments are accessible by a range of non .carmodes”



NEWBATH



Key Principles:

• Location

• Density

• Nature of land uses

• Juxtopositioning of land uses



HousingDensities



Average Housing Densities

Britain 23 /rooms ha

London 40

Barcelona 200

3NewPPG 400up to



Not necessarily

* 47 % The majority of that may actually drive to work

?Is BuckinghamSustainable47 % of employment population work in Buckingham

itself

* 53 % The remaining may need to drive long distances



Modal Split to Primary Schools

Car Walk Bus

Durham 56% 29% 15%

Henley 61% 38% 1%

Milton Keynes 39% 61% -



• , Housing allocation at Banbury Oxford

• , Station relocation at Ipswich Suffolk

• , FlitwickStation Bedfordshire

• Transport interchange at ClaphamJunction



:QUANTIFICATIONof the effects of :QUANTIFICATIONof the effects of

• Level of public transport provision

• Different site locations

• Otherland uses

• Housing mix

• Housing layout



Delivering Sustainable ResidentialDevelopments

Colin Buchanan and Partners

delivering sustainable residential development

Documents

buckingham sustainable

larger housing developments

housing mix housing

housing allocation

average housing densities

juxtopositioning of

suffolk flitwick station

oxford station relocation