deadly household pollution: a call to action

2
Editorial Deadly Household Pollution: A Call to Action Although an ancient hazard, indoor air pollution in developing countries is an issue of immediacy, for it is now understood to wreak a devastating toll on the health of some of the most vulnerable populations around the world. Consider the following facts: A major source of indoor air pollution in developing countries is the burning of solid fuels such as biomass (animal dung, wood, crop residues) and coal for heating and cooking. Nearly one-half of the world’s population, some 3 billion people, con- tinues to depend on solid fuels for their household needs. Indoor solid fuel burning is, according to WHO, responsible for about 1.6 million premature deaths per year, mainly children and women, and is responsible for 1.3–4.0% of the global burden of disease. This toll is greater than that from malaria, lung cancer, or traffic accidents and about twice that from outdoor air pollution. In the poorest developing countries, indoor air pol- lution is responsible for a greater proportion of ill- health and premature death than any other risk factor except malnutrition, unsafe sex, and poor water and sanitation. Children and women are particularly affected by poor indoor air quality in developing countries, and are often subjected to indoor air pollution that ex- ceeds international health-based guidelines by 20 times or more. A growing body of evidence indicates that women exposed to smoke from solid fuel fires in homes may also have significantly elevated risks of lung cancer, emphysema, and tuberculosis. Rural women often spend many hours each week searching for solid fuels, denying them opportunities for paid employment that would improve the standard of living for their families. In areas of social disruption such as refugee camps, the chore of collecting solid fuels leads to risks of beatings, rapes, kidnappings, and murder of women. In China, household use of coals contaminated with toxic elements such as arsenic and fluorine are poi- soning millions of people. There is evidence that this is a solvable problem given the right commitment from political, corporate, institu- tional, and scientific leaders. Working together with leaders within the affected communities, it is possible to make improvements over short time periods, and to save hundreds of thousands of lives every year. Recent efforts by scientists, policymakers, and cor- porate foundations in rural China, India, East Africa, and elsewhere have shown that low-cost interventions, including community education, improved cooking devices and fuels, improved stove placement and ventilation, or strategies for reduced exposures of children can produce important benefits, although there are few large-scale sustained efforts. The largest and most successful program, in China during the 1980s, introduced more than 150 million improved stoves with chimneys to its rural populations, although more improvement is needed to meet today’s air quality standards. Compared to the billions of dollars spent every year for research and control of outdoor air pollution around the world, however, expenditures for develop- ing and implementing reliable interventions for redu- cing household air pollution among poor communities in developing countries are lagging far behind. Given that there are important environmental and social as well as health benefits of such interventions and the large populations involved, however, there is ample justification for stepping up efforts to develop, test, and deploy improved stoves and ventilation as well as promote cleaner fuels, and other innovations to reduce the global burden from use of household solid fuels. The International Academy of Indoor Air Sciences calls upon the governments, institutions and corpora- tions of the world to take actions to reduce the devastating effects of indoor air pollution in developing countries. We offer the scientific backing and know- ledge to work together to rid human kind of this tragic but very solvable problem. It can and must be done. The solution starts with a collective will. The International Academy of Indoor Air Sciences (IAIAS) is the honor society of the world’s foremost experts on indoor air pollution. The Academy is an independent, international, multidisciplinary, scientific organization whose purpose is to promote international scientific cooperation in the indoor air sciences. Members Indoor Air 2006; 16: 2–3 www.blackwellpublishing.com/ina Printed in Singapore. All rights reserved Copyright Ó Blackwell Munksgaard 2006 INDOOR AIR ISSN 0905-6947 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00416.x 2

Post on 21-Jul-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Deadly Household Pollution: A Call to Action

Editorial

Deadly Household Pollution: A Call to Action

Although an ancient hazard, indoor air pollution indeveloping countries is an issue of immediacy, for it isnow understood to wreak a devastating toll on thehealth of some of the most vulnerable populationsaround the world. Consider the following facts:

• A major source of indoor air pollution in developingcountries is the burning of solid fuels such asbiomass (animal dung, wood, crop residues) andcoal for heating and cooking. Nearly one-half ofthe world’s population, some 3 billion people, con-tinues to depend on solid fuels for their householdneeds.

• Indoor solid fuel burning is, according to WHO,responsible for about 1.6 million premature deathsper year, mainly children and women, and isresponsible for 1.3–4.0% of the global burden ofdisease. This toll is greater than that from malaria,lung cancer, or traffic accidents and about twice thatfrom outdoor air pollution.

• In the poorest developing countries, indoor air pol-lution is responsible for a greater proportion of ill-health and premature death than any other riskfactor except malnutrition, unsafe sex, and poorwater and sanitation.

• Children and women are particularly affected bypoor indoor air quality in developing countries, andare often subjected to indoor air pollution that ex-ceeds international health-based guidelines by 20times or more.

• A growing body of evidence indicates that womenexposed to smoke from solid fuel fires in homes mayalso have significantly elevated risks of lung cancer,emphysema, and tuberculosis.

• Rural women often spend many hours each weeksearching for solid fuels, denying them opportunitiesfor paid employment that would improve thestandard of living for their families.

• In areas of social disruption such as refugee camps,the chore of collecting solid fuels leads to risksof beatings, rapes, kidnappings, and murder ofwomen.

• In China, household use of coals contaminated withtoxic elements such as arsenic and fluorine are poi-soning millions of people.

There is evidence that this is a solvable problem giventhe right commitment from political, corporate, institu-tional, and scientific leaders. Working together withleaders within the affected communities, it is possible tomake improvements over short time periods, and to savehundreds of thousands of lives every year.Recent efforts by scientists, policymakers, and cor-

porate foundations in rural China, India, East Africa,and elsewhere have shown that low-cost interventions,including community education, improved cookingdevices and fuels, improved stove placement andventilation, or strategies for reduced exposures ofchildren can produce important benefits, althoughthere are few large-scale sustained efforts. The largestand most successful program, in China during the1980s, introduced more than 150 million improvedstoves with chimneys to its rural populations, althoughmore improvement is needed to meet today’s airquality standards.Compared to the billions of dollars spent every year

for research and control of outdoor air pollutionaround the world, however, expenditures for develop-ing and implementing reliable interventions for redu-cing household air pollution among poor communitiesin developing countries are lagging far behind. Giventhat there are important environmental and social aswell as health benefits of such interventions and thelarge populations involved, however, there is amplejustification for stepping up efforts to develop, test, anddeploy improved stoves and ventilation as well aspromote cleaner fuels, and other innovations to reducethe global burden from use of household solid fuels.The International Academy of Indoor Air Sciences

calls upon the governments, institutions and corpora-tions of the world to take actions to reduce thedevastating effects of indoor air pollution in developingcountries. We offer the scientific backing and know-ledge to work together to rid human kind of this tragicbut very solvable problem. It can and must be done.The solution starts with a collective will.The International Academy of Indoor Air Sciences

(IAIAS) is the honor society of the world’s foremost

experts on indoor air pollution. The Academy is an

independent, international, multidisciplinary, scientific

organization whose purpose is to promote international

scientific cooperation in the indoor air sciences. Members

Indoor Air 2006; 16: 2–3www.blackwellpublishing.com/inaPrinted in Singapore. All rights reserved

Copyright � Blackwell Munksgaard 2006

INDOOR AIRISSN 0905-6947

doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00416.x

2

Page 2: Deadly Household Pollution: A Call to Action

come from academia, government, research organiza-

tions, and private industry throughout the world. An

important purpose of the Academy is to be a forum for

scientific communication. This is to be accomplished in

part through the provision of scientific advice by publishing

consensus documents on critical scientific and public

health issues. This document is a declaration from the

Academy Congress held September 4, 2005 in Beijing,

China, at the start of the 10th International Conference on

Indoor Air Quality and Climate.

The International Academy of Indoor Air Sciences:The Board at the meeting – Jack Spengler (President),Jan Sundell (Vice President), Shin-ichi Tanabe(Secretary), The Board from 2005 – Jan Sundell(President), Shin-ichi Tanabe (Vice President), BillNazaroff (Secretary).

Editorial

3