david a. bergeron rosemarie nassif

52
Federal Update State Higher Education Executive Officers 2011 Higher Education Policy Conference David A. Bergeron Rosemarie Nassif Deputy Assistant Secretary for Senior Advisor to the Policy, Planning, and Innovation Assistant Secretary for Office of Postsecondary Education Postsecondary Education

Upload: zocha

Post on 22-Feb-2016

52 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Federal Update State Higher Education Executive Officers 2011 Higher Education Policy Conference . David A. Bergeron Rosemarie Nassif Deputy Assistant Secretary for Senior Advisor to the Policy , Planning, and InnovationAssistant Secretary for - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Federal UpdateState Higher Education Executive Officers

2011 Higher Education Policy Conference

David A. Bergeron Rosemarie NassifDeputy Assistant Secretary for Senior Advisor to the Policy, Planning, and Innovation Assistant Secretary for Office of Postsecondary Education Postsecondary Education

Page 2: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Background How did we get here?

Regulatory Activity Budget Proposals Gainful Employment Meeting President Obama’s

2020 College Completion Goal

TOPICS

Page 3: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Percentage of Undergraduates Applying for Aid

Page 4: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

$3,500

$4,000

$4,500

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

1972

1975

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005Low-income

High-income

Pell Grant Max

Linear (Low-income)

Linear (High-income)

Percentage of High School Graduates Enrolling the Fall After Graduation by

Family Income

Page 5: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Federal Student Aid Available by Type of Aid

2005 2008 2010 2011 CR 2012 Request

$0$20,000$40,000$60,000$80,000

$100,000$120,000$140,000$160,000$180,000

GrantsLoansWork-Study

Fiscal Year

In billions of dollars

Page 6: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

The share of students receiving aid has increased but not uniformly across all sectors of higher education.

  Priva

te for

-profit

2-ye

ar

  Priva

te for

-profit

4-ye

ar

  Priv

ate fo

r-profi

t less-

than-2

-year

  Priv

ate no

t-for-p

rofit le

ss-tha

n-2-ye

ar

  Priva

te no

t-for-p

rofit 2

-year

  Priva

te no

t-for-p

rofit 4

-year

  Publ

ic 4-ye

ar

  Pub

lic les

s-tha

n-2-ye

ar

  Publ

ic 2-ye

ar0

20406080

100

Source: National Postsecondary Student Aid Survey, 2007-08

Percentage of Students Receiving Student Aid By

Sector

Page 7: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Financial aid to students is increasing but, despite significant increases in Pell Grant funding, the increase has primarily been in the form of Federal student loans.

Ten-Year Trend in Student Aid and Nonfederal Loans per FTE Used to Finance Postsecondary Education Expenses in Constant 2009 Dollars, 1999-2000 to 2009-10

99-00

00-01

01-02

02-03

03-04

04-05

05-06

06-07

07-08

08-09

09-10

$0

$1,000

$2,000

$3,000

$4,000

$5,000

$6,000

$7,000

$8,000

GrantsLoans

Source: Trends in Student Aid, 2010, College Board

Trends in Student Aid

Page 8: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Instructional expenses have been relatively constant although the share of funds spent on instruction at for-profit institutions has been declining.

2001-02

2002-03

2003-04

2004-05

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

PublicPrivateProprietary

NOTE: Public institutions not included in 2008-09 due to changing in reporting.Source: IPEDS Data Center

Instructional Expenses as a Percentage of Total Expenses

Page 9: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

  Publi

c 4-ye

ar

  Priva

te no

t-for-p

rofit 4

-year

  Priva

te for

-profit

4-ye

ar

  Pub

lic 2-y

ear

  Priv

ate no

t-for-p

rofit 2

-year

  Priv

ate fo

r-profi

t 2-ye

ar

  Pub

lic les

s-tha

n-2-ye

ar

  Priva

te no

t-for-p

rofit lt

-2-yea

r

  Priva

te for

-profit

lt-2-y

ear

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

20092001

Any Degree or Certificate within Prior 6 Year PeriodBy Type of First Institution Attended

Source: Beginning Postsecondary Students

Page 10: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

  Public

4-year

  Priv

ate not-

for-profi

t 4-ye

ar

  Priv

ate fo

r-profi

t 4-ye

ar

  Public

2-year

  Priv

ate not-

for-profi

t 2-ye

ar

  Priv

ate fo

r-profi

t 2-ye

ar

  Public

less-t

han-2-ye

ar

  Priv

ate fo

r-profi

t lt-2-ye

ar

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

BlackHispanicWhite

Attainment of Any Degree or Certificate within Prior 6 Years, 2009 by Type of First Institution Attended and by Race and Ethnicity

Source: Beginning Postsecondary Students

Page 11: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Budget Proposals

Page 12: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

President’s 2020 Goal High Priority Performance Goals

Reform Struggling Schools Ensure Effective Teacher Corps Develop and Adopt College/Career-Ready

Standards Simplify Student Aid Evidence-based Policy—Invest in What

Works Use Data to Inform Decisions

12

Budget Proposals

Page 13: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

FY 12 Budget Policies Maintain and Sustain Pell Grants

Two Pell Grants in One Year Eliminate Graduate Student In-school Interest

Subsidy Expanded and Modernized Perkins Loan

Program Student Loan Conversion

Presidential Teaching Fellows College Completion Agenda

“First In the World” (FIPSE) College Completion Incentive Grants (States)

13

Budget Proposals

Page 14: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Presidential Teaching Fellows Replace TEACH Grant Program States:

Implement Performance-based Licensure Enhance Teacher Prep Program Accountability Provide for $10,000 One-year Scholarships Three-year Commitment to High-need Subjects in

High-need Schools

14

Budget Proposals

Page 15: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

First In the World Seek Innovative Solutions, Build Evidence

and Improve Higher Education Productivity, Efficiencies and Quality

FIPSE Grant Competition Investing in Innovation with a Strong Research

Component, Rigorous Evaluation, and Dissemination of Effective, Proven Results

Data Driven—Differentiated Funding Tiers Peer Review by Content/Research/Evaluation Specialists

15

Budget Proposals

Page 16: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

College Completion Incentive Grants Encourage State- and Institutional-level

Reform in College Completion Performance-based Funding Reward States and IHEs for Reforms

Leading to Successful Outcomes: Improve College Preparation Facilitate Transfers Among Public IHEs Increase Goals for Graduate Rates & the

Number of Graduates

16

Budget Proposals

Page 17: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

FY 12 Budget Policies Maintain and Sustain Pell GrantsTwo Pell Grants in One YearEliminate Graduate Student In-school

Interest Subsidy Expanded and Modernized Perkins Loan

Program Student Loan Conversion

Presidential Teaching Fellows College Completion Agenda “First In the World” (FIPSE) College Completion Incentive Grants (States)

17

Budget Proposals

Page 18: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Regulatory Activity

Page 19: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Program Integrity October 29, 2010: Effective July 1, 2011 June 13, 2011: Effective July 1, 2012

Foreign Schools November 1, 2010: Effective July 1, 2011

19

Regulatory Activity

Page 20: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Program Integrity Final Regulations Holding Programs Accountable for

Preparing Students for Gainful Employment:◦ Graduation Rate and Job Placement Disclosures◦ Approval of Additional Programs

Protecting consumers from misleading or overly aggressive recruiting practices, and clarifying state oversight responsibilities:

◦ Misrepresentation◦ Incentive Compensation◦ State Authorization

Page 21: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Program Integrity Final Regulations Ensuring that only eligible students receive

federal funds:◦ High School Diploma◦ College Credits◦ Ability To Benefit (ATB)◦ Satisfactory Academic Progress◦ Verification

Clarifying the courses that are eligible for federal aid, and the amount of aid that is appropriate:o Written Arrangemento Retaking Courseworko Determining When a Student Has Withdrawno Disbursing Federal Student Aid Fundo Credit Hour

Page 22: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Negotiated Rulemaking 2011-12 What we were thinking? “Naturally readable” Federal Student

Loan regulations Total and permanent disability student

loan discharge Hearings in Tacoma, Chicago & Charleston Public comment received and under review Announcement of one or more negotiating

committees with tentative agenda forthcoming

22

Regulatory Activity

Page 23: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Gainful Employment

Page 24: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

An educational program is Title IV eligible only if the program: If offered by a public or non-profit institution, leads to a degree; or

If offered by any institution “leads to gainful employment in a recognized occupation”.These programs are referred to as a “Gainful Employment” or “GE” Programs.

24

HEA Requirement

Page 25: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Proprietary institutions All programs except: Programs leading to a baccalaureate

degree in liberal arts offered since January 2009 that has been regionally accredited since October 2007.

Preparatory non-certificate coursework necessary for enrollment in an eligible program.

25

HEA Requirement

Page 26: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Public institutions and not-for-profit institutions

All programs, except for: Programs that lead to a degree; Programs of at least two years in length

that are fully transferable to a bachelor’s degree program; and

Preparatory non-certificate coursework necessary for enrollment in an eligible program.

26

HEA Requirement

Page 27: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Teacher certification programs leading to a certificate awarded by the institution but not to teacher training programs that do not lead to a certificate.

ESL programs leading to a certificate or, if a proprietary institution, a degree.

27

GE Programs include -The Law - HEAHEA Requirement

Page 28: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Two sets of Final Rules published on October 29, 2010, with effective date of July 1, 2011- Program Integrity (included Gainful

Employment Reporting and Disclosures) Gainful Employment – New Programs

Final Rules on metrics to define gainful employment published on June 13, 2011, with effective date of July 1, 2012 or later.

28

The Regulations

Page 29: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

For each GE Program, institution must provide prospective students with specific information (Effective July 1, 2011)

Institutional disclosures to provide information to help students choose among GE programs.

29

Disclosures

Page 30: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

When available, institutions will be required to use a disclosure form provided by the Department. The form was not available by July 1, 2011.

Institutions must comply with these disclosure requirements independently until form is available.

Disclosure Form

Page 31: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

By October 1, 2011 institutions must report information on students who were enrolled in a GE program for the 2006-07 through the 2010-11 award years.

Information includes: Student and program identifying

information; Loan amounts; Enrollment information; and Tuition and Fees (optional).

Gainful Employment Reporting

Page 32: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

32

Adding a New GE Program Must notify ED at least 90 days before

the first day of class. If the first day of class is on or after July 1, 2011 and before October 1, 2011, notification was due by July 1, 2011

If the first day of class is on or after October 1, 2011, institutions must provide notification to the Department at least 90 days prior to the first day of class.

Page 33: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Notice of Intent to Offer an Educational Program must describe: How the institution determined the need for

the program? How the program was designed to meet

market needs? Any wage analysis conducted.

33

Notification Required

Page 34: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

GAINFUL EMPLOYMENT METRICS

What do 90,000 comments look like?

Page 35: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Final Rule Final Rule published on June 13, 2011 –

Defines “gainful employment” to be when a substantial number of the GE Program’s students – Are repaying their Title IV loans –

Repayment Rate Have a reasonable debt burden –

Debt to Earnings Ratio. Informational rates will be issued in 2012 First official rates will be issued in 2013

35

Page 36: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Two Metrics Repayment Rate –

The percentage of loans that the GE Program’s former students are repaying (weighted for loan balance).

Debt to Earnings Ratio –For the GE Program’s completers, the average educational loan annual repayment amount as a proportion of the average borrowers’ income.

36

Page 37: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Failing programs do not lose eligibility immediately.

Standards help programs raise performance.

37

Program ImprovementFinal RuleImpacts

Page 38: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Meeting President Obama’s

2020 College Completion Goal

Page 39: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

46

Percentage of Adults Age 25-34with Postsecondary Education

(Associate Degree of Higher in U.S. per 2008 Current Population Survey, U.S. Census Bureau)

Page 40: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Less than high school10%

High school grad-uate28%

Associate's degree17%

Some college12%

Bachelor's degree23%

Graduate degree10%

47

Education Requirements for Jobs, 2018

Georgetown University, Center on Education and the Workforce, 2010 p. 14 http://www9.georgetown.edu/grad/gppi/hpi/cew/pdfs/FullReport.pdf

Page 41: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

No High

Scho

ol

High Sc

hool

Some C

olleg

e

Associ

ate's D

egree

Bache

lor's D

egree

Master'

s Deg

ree

Doctora

l Deg

ree

Profes

siona

l Deg

ree$0

$20,000

$40,000

$60,000

$80,000

$100,000

$120,000

$19,600 $26,700 $31,000 $32,700 $42,700

$51,100 $68,800 $74,400

$4,700 $7,100

$8,700 $9,300

$13,000

$16,200

$23,100 $25,600

Earnings & Tax Payments by Educa-tional Attainment

Taxes PaidAfter-Tax Earn-ing

Sources: The College Board, Education Pays, 2010

$100,000

$91,900

$67,300

$55,700

$42,000$39,700

$33,800

$24,300

Page 42: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Education for a Vibrant Democratic Society

Informed, effective participation in democratic life.

Capacity to solve the most pressing problems of our time.

Ability to work in diverse environments with diverse cultures, religions, ethnic backgrounds

Global perspectives

Page 43: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

50

AccessClose the opportunity gap by improving affordability and increasing access to college and workforce training, especially for adult learners, low-income students, and under-represented minorities.

QualityFoster institutional quality with accountability and transparency.

CompletionIncrease degree and certificate completion and job placement, with special attention to fast growing first generation, under-represented and economically disadvantaged populations.

Strategic Objectives

Page 44: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Challenges to the Completion AgendaReductions in State funding

Minneso

ta

North D

akota

Alaska

Rhod

e Isla

nd

Hawaii

Arkan

sas

Maine

New Jer

sey

Nebras

ka

Mississ

ippi

Tennes

see

Conn

ecticu

t

Kansa

sUtah Ida

hoTex

asSou

th Caro

lina

Missour

i

Georgi

a

Wiscon

sin

Oregon

Michiga

n

Pennsy

lvania

Califo

rnia

Arizon

a

-60.0%

-50.0%

-40.0%

-30.0%

-20.0%

-10.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

Approximate Percentage Change in FY 2012 State Oper-ating Support for Four-Year Public Universities (AASCU, 7-

2011)

Page 45: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Challenges - Affordability

Page 46: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Achieving the 2020College Completion Goal

Increase the U.S. College Degree Attainment Rate from 40 to 60%

10 million additional Americans ages 25-34 with an associate or baccalaureate degree (includes 8 million beyond projected growth)

3.7 million more high school graduates will become college graduates

6.3 million adult learners will become college graduates

Note: The attainment rate reflects the number of individuals in the population who have attained the degree or diploma. This differs from the graduation/completion rate, which measures the number of individuals within a cohort who graduate or complete their program within a certain amount of time.

Page 47: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Data Collection

Practices to Support College

Completion

State Outreach(SHEEOs, National

Governors Association)

Inter-Agency College

Completion Champions

Institution Outreach and

SupportPublic

Communications

Internal Program

Alignment

College Completion Task Force

President’s Goal: First in the World!

Page 48: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Initiatives Launched / Ongoing College Completion Tool Kit for States Data Dashboard for ED Website Request for Information (RFI)

Page 49: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Tool Kit Action Steps1. Set Goals; Develop an Action Plan2. Embrace Performance-Based Funding3. Align High School standards with College

Entrance Standards4. Make it Easier for Students to Transfer5. Use Data to Drive Decision Making6. Accelerate Learning and Reduce Costs7. Target Adults With Some College

Page 50: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Momentum Forward Data Driven/Research-Based Best Practices Forum of Top Researchers Tool Kit for Higher Education State and Regional Summits/Forums External Stakeholders Map of National Strategies Game Changer

Page 51: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Three Commandments Advance the Conversation Promote Innovation Celebrate Results

[email protected]

Page 52: David A. Bergeron  Rosemarie  Nassif

Questions

59