date 2005-02-10 name dr. roland m. wagner interoperability in a national and international context...

•

Date 2005-02-10 Name Dr. Roland M. Wagner

Interoperability in a national and international context– implementing SDIs – NRW Case Study AGI Technical SiG Event

London

Dr. R. M. Wagner Interoperability in a national and international context [email protected]

Environment

• from GDI NRW Perspective

• Common Goal: SDI

OGCISO

EU INSPIRE

GSDI

GDI NRW

Federal Mapping Agencies

State Mapping Agencies

Local Mapping Agencies

Private Data

Provider

Private Data

Provider

SoftwareSupplier

Expert Data

Provider

other GDI

Initiatives

Center forGI

Universities


How to organize this environment successfully?

• Different scopes (e.g. local, expert)

• Different capabilities (e.g. IT investment budget and skilled staff)

• Different characteristics (e.g. operator, software supplier)


GDI NRW initial Situation in 1999/2000

• NRW, a German State (1/16), Capital Düsseldorf

• 17 million inhabitants

• GI Domain decentralized within NRW• e.g. 54 Local Mapping Agencies• All worldwide GIS supplier within NRW

• Clear need for interoperability (with a technical solution, not organizational)


GDI NRW First Phase 1999-2003

• Initial 10 SDI projects with some public sponsorship (e.g. GeoMarket.NRW)

• Driven by software suppliers

• SDI components are too complex and risky to be developed by a single company

• Clear need for co-operation

Instrument LocalTestbeds


Relationship local - global

Iteration

Business Model

Local GDI NRW

Global OGC/ISO Development

Development


Instrument “Local Testbed”

• Preparation in SiGs

• All testbed members must be OGC members

• Formulized with• Open Call for Participation (February)• Deadline (March)• Joint presentation on Fair Intergeo (October)

• Testbed I in 2001

• Testbed II in 2002

• 10 active testbed members


Instrument “Local Testbed”

• First Goal: (Re-)Implementation of OGC (Draft) Specifications

• Later Detection of missing pieces, e.g. WPOS and WAAS, first approaches

• No financial sponsorship

• Principle: Exchange of Services• CS-W, WMS, WMS-SLD, WFS, WPOS,

• Marketing platform

• Data Provider/Operator involved as “Supporter” in GDI NRW Testbed II


Summery First Phase

• Prove-of-concept of SDI components

• Public demonstrations

• Public education within the self organized SiGs

• Specialized Supplier

• Informal Exchange of Information

• Trust within the supplier community

Dr. R. M. Wagner Interoperability in a national and international context 10

[email protected]

GDI Second Phase 2004-(2005)

• Goal direct involvement of provider and other operator

• Application field is much wider than some technical implementations

• Sustainability of SDIs only with operators and business models

Instrument JointProjects


[email protected]

Instrument “Joint Project”

• Goal: Operation, no new development

• Joint activities:• Catalog / Metadata for data and services and• Marketing• Education• Team Spirit• Information Exchange

• Open Call for Participation in February

• Joint Presentation at Intergeo Fair in October


[email protected]

Joint Project 2004

• 25 Projects

• 38 Organizations

• From various application domains

• More than 129 data source contributions • Most via WMS, few WFS

• Strong motivation for local (but “data rich”) municipalities

• Sponsorship (license, cash)

• Coordinated by CeGI, Dortmund


[email protected]

Public Presentation Intergeo Stuttgart

• Certificates and later “best 3 projects”


[email protected]

Contribution Categories


[email protected]

Contributions in Detail• Wind power stations• Wind potential

• Geobasis- und Forestry

• Geomarkting

• ALK (geobasis data)• Heritage Monuments• Soil• Soil Value• Building plans• Building plans -overview• Directmarketing• Noise by Airplanes• FN-Plan• Leisure• Leisure Industry• Industry- und Commercial Areas• Sewer Systems• Klima• Statistic, Municipal• L-Plan• L-Plan-Grenzen• Air quality• Emergency • Settlements• Other municipal Information• Administration borders

Geobasis- und agricultural data

BiotopverbundFFH-GebieteLSGNatural MonumentsNature Protection ZonesSchutzwürdige BiotopeEnvironmentUmweltthemen allg.Bird Protection Zones

Meta dataService Monitoring

DGK5DTK10GeobasisdatenOrthofotosCity Basic MapCity MapTK100TK25TK50

StreetsStreets in NRWStreets, Traffic, Bike streetsTraffic Situation, DisturbancesParking InformationTraffic load

“Fish escalators”WaterWater streamsWater QualityFlood controlFlood protection areasLimnologische SensorsRainPegelTalsperrenWaterwasserhöfigeGebieteWater protection areasWehre

For some data productsmultiple provider=> competition


[email protected]

Joint Project 2005 “Networking Business”

• Need for geoDRM functionalities, e.g. Authentication & Authorization, Pricing & Ordering, already evident in 2004

• New data/service contribution welcomed

• License declaration a “must” in 2005

• Goal: license categories (“geoGNU”s)

• Quality of Service/Infrastructure


[email protected]

Conclusion

• “Testbeds” and “Joint Projects” are successful instruments to build up an active SDI environment

• Relationship between activation investments and started investments by members is very good

• Open to share our experiences

Contact: [email protected]

date 2005-02-10 name dr. roland m. wagner interoperability in a national and international context...

Documents

gdi nrw testbed

international context10

software supplier slide

dortmund slide

organizational slide

supplier community slide

international key issue

gdi nrw initial situation