data talk slides
DESCRIPTION
Seminar for Department Chairs, held at De La Salle High School, summer 2007.TRANSCRIPT
Data-based Decision-making at the Department level
Agenda
1. Appeals for Advanced Placement Courses
2. Department budget analysis
3. Analysis of Quarter Grades
4. Encouraging Professional Development
5. Investigating Counseling Department concerns
6. Common Exams analysis
Appeals for Advanced Placement courses
“The Department Chair will supervise the setting of criteria and the selection of students for Honors coursework. The process begins with the formulation of criteria at the appropriate level meeting followed by full department discussion and vote. Procedures for applying for inclusion in honors courses will be published in the course catalog and conveyed to the students by their current social studies instructor. Criteria are reviewed annually. Students who fail to meet the criteria may appeal to the Department Chair for approval to enroll in the course.”
“The Department Chair will supervise the setting of criteria and the selection of students for Honors coursework. The process begins with the formulation of criteria at the appropriate level meeting followed by full department discussion and vote. Procedures for applying for inclusion in honors courses will be published in the course catalog and conveyed to the students by their current social studies instructor. Criteria are reviewed annually. Students who fail to meet the criteria may appeal to the Department Chair for approval to enroll in the course.”
Department Budget Analysis
Analysis of Quarter Grades
Encouraging Professional Development
Fall, 2005
Fall, 2006
AP US
5.8
20.823.526.1
32.5
22.224.7
19.9
13.610.9
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5
SINational
Investigating Counseling Department concerns
In-class Assignment
Read the next section in the textbook and take notes using the provided guide questions.
When you are finished, get the quiz from the front. You may use the notes you’ve just taken for the quiz.
Data was collected from 352 freshmen.
Data was collected from 352 freshmen.
“Eric,I read your SS minutes. I want to tell you that I really respect the fact that you did a quantitative study concerning the issue of stress with 9th graders and how that might potentially apply to WH1. I respect it, and it kind of made me laugh. A PowerPoint presentation to boot!”
“Eric,I read your SS minutes. I want to tell you that I really respect the fact that you did a quantitative study concerning the issue of stress with 9th graders and how that might potentially apply to WH1. I respect it, and it kind of made me laugh. A PowerPoint presentation to boot!”
Common exams analysis
• Every World History 1 student received the same Spring Final exam consisting of– 25 multiple-choice questions about the Spring– 50 multiple-choice questions about the Fall– 35 geography items– 1 thirty-point essay
Three versions of the test; same layout; same format; same geographic
features; same essay – all to
minimize confounding
variables.
Three versions of the test; same layout; same format; same geographic
features; same essay – all to
minimize confounding
variables.
Conclusion
Data
Reflection
Collaboration(i.e. Work)
Contact Information
Eric E CastroSaint Ignatius College PreparatorySan Francisco, [email protected]://www.siprep.org/faculty/ecastro
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.