data overview szczypka
DESCRIPTION
Assignment #1, Data Overview for my EDUC6240 Fall Class #2TRANSCRIPT
Montclair 2010 All-Staff Meeting
A sneak peek into our students’ performance in math
Data Overview of CSAP Mathematics (Gr. 5 Focus)By: Elizabeth Szczypka
Assignment #1
Take a second to think…
• Because it’s a new school year, I want you to think back to last year….
…Think about the students that were struggling the most. Who were they? Girls? Boys? African-American? Asian?English Language Learners?
• Today we are going to look at CSAP Mathematics data that can give us a starting point into understanding which students are in need of the most help.
• Open your mind and get ready to learn!
28%
29%
25%
14%
1%3%
Montclair 5th Grade Student Population by Ethnicity
Latino/a (n=18)
African American (n=19)
White/Anglo (n=16)
African (n=9)
Native American (n=1)
Middle Eastern (n=2)
Total 5th grade students (n=65)
54%
46%
Montclair Elementary 2010 gr. 5 Gender Distribution
Males (n=35)
Females (n=30)
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
% Unsatisfactory% PartiallyProficient % Proficient
% Advanced% No Score
Pe
rce
nta
ge o
f St
ud
en
ts
Proficiency Level
Montclair Elementary 2010 Mathematics Gr. 5: State, District and School CSAP comparisons
State Average (n=60257)
District Average (n=5553)
School Average (n=65)
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
45.00%
50.00%
2008 2009 2010
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
Year
Montclair Elementary Gr. 5 CSAP Mathematic Proficiency by Year (2008-2010)
Advanced
Proficient
Partially Proficient
Unsatisfactory
-80.00%
-60.00%
-40.00%
-20.00%
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
Grade 3 2008 (n=53) Grade 4 2009 (n=53) Grade 5 2010 (n=65)
Pe
rce
nt
of
stu
de
nts
Montclair Elementary Cohort Trend Gr. 3-5 (2008-2010) CSAP Mathematics Comparison
Advanced
Proficient
Unsatisfactory
Partially Proficient
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
2008, gr. 3 (n=53) 2009 gr. 4 (n=53) 2010 gr. 5 (n=65)
Pe
rce
nt
of
Pro
fici
en
t St
ud
en
ts
Year and Grade Level
Montclair Elementary CSAP Mathematic Scores: Cohort Comparison of Proficient Students by Gender for the Class of 2017
Female
Male
Whole School
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
Unsatisfactory Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
Proficiency Levels
Montclair Elementary 2010 Gr. 5 Mathematics CSAP: Males vs. Females
Male
Female
(n=35)
(n=30)
(n=7)(n=9) (n=11) (n=8)
(n=7)(n=11) (n=9)
(n=3)
-80.00%
-60.00%
-40.00%
-20.00%
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
White Hispanic Black
Montclair Elementary 2010 Mathematics Gr. 5 CSAP Results by Ethnicity
% Advanced
% Proficient
% Unsatisfactory
% Partially Proficient
(n=2)
(n=9)
(n=7)
(n=2)
(n=7)
(n=4)
(n=11)
(n=3)
(n=1)
(n=7)
(n=7)
(n=5)
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
Students withDisabilities
English LanguageLearners
EconomicallyDisadvantaged
Pe
rce
nt
of
Stu
de
nts
Special Group
Montclair Elementary Gr. 5 2010 Mathematics CSAP: Percentage of Proficient Students by Special Groups
School (n=65)
State (n=60257)
Questions:
• Is any of this data
surprising to you?
•What piece of data has
stuck with you the most?
Why?
• Do you feel that the
results from the CSAP
scores are accurately
reflected in your
classroom? Why or why
not?
Discuss with the people at your table and be ready to share!