data-modeling mindsets and the digital humanities
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Data-modeling Mindsets and the Digital Humanities](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042723/587d57381a28abee158b5d79/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Data-Modeling Mindsetsand the DigitalHumanities
Richard J. UrbanFSU Digital Scholars
November 9, 2015
![Page 2: Data-modeling Mindsets and the Digital Humanities](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042723/587d57381a28abee158b5d79/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Agenda• Mindsets• Model development in the
Linked Women Pedagogues Project
![Page 3: Data-modeling Mindsets and the Digital Humanities](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042723/587d57381a28abee158b5d79/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Mindsets
Iivari, J., Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. K. (1998). A Paradigmatic Analysis Contrasting Information Systems Development Approaches and Methodologies. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 164–193. http://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.164
![Page 4: Data-modeling Mindsets and the Digital Humanities](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042723/587d57381a28abee158b5d79/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Metadata Mindsets
![Page 5: Data-modeling Mindsets and the Digital Humanities](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042723/587d57381a28abee158b5d79/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Knowledge Organization Ontology • Model of “bibliographic universe”
• bibliocentrism
Epistemology Fractured and contested.• Empiricism, Rationalism, Historicism, Pragmatism
(Hjørland)• Operationalism, Referential Theory, Instrumental
Theory, and Systems Theory (Svenonius)• Social epistemology (Shera, Egan; Furner)
Methodology • Design of metadata encoding standards• Specification of rules for description (AACR2/RDA,
etc.)• Development of controlled vocabularies and
classifications• Design of information storage/retrieval systems• Information needs/behaviors study
Ethics • Objectivism/Empiricism (ideal)• Literary warrant vs. cultural warrant
![Page 6: Data-modeling Mindsets and the Digital Humanities](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042723/587d57381a28abee158b5d79/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Machine Readable Cataloging (MARC)Most citation formats.
Functional Requirementsfor Bibliographic Records (FRBR)
CIDOC CRMFRBRoo
![Page 7: Data-modeling Mindsets and the Digital Humanities](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042723/587d57381a28abee158b5d79/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Interstitial Metadata
Knowledge OrganizationData Models
Scholarly Data Models
![Page 8: Data-modeling Mindsets and the Digital Humanities](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042723/587d57381a28abee158b5d79/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
(Graban, 2014)
![Page 9: Data-modeling Mindsets and the Digital Humanities](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042723/587d57381a28abee158b5d79/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Metadata Mapping Project (MDMP)
• Femisist historiographic methodology that digitally portrays rhetorical activity for which there may not be circulating artifacts. (Graban, 2013)
• The work of MDMP, then, is to create an epistemic network that makes visible browseable and dynamic lists that formally represent the kinds of topical relationships believed to exist among a set of data records at any point in time (what [Graban] terms ontologies) and movable maps.
• Visualizations (what [Graban] terms ec0logies)
![Page 10: Data-modeling Mindsets and the Digital Humanities](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042723/587d57381a28abee158b5d79/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
MDMP/LWPOntology Model of rhetorical activity?
• Intellectual topographies• People, Organizations, Events• Publications, Manuscripts, textual
components• Concept thesauriModel for feminist historiography?• Recovery process/provenance• Peer contributions and recognition
Epistemology
• Feminism• Historicism • ?
Methodology • Social/epistemic network analysis• Visualization of rhetorical activities• Crowdsourcing• Historiography• Bibliometrics/altmetrics (Historical altmetrics)
Ethics • ?
![Page 11: Data-modeling Mindsets and the Digital Humanities](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042723/587d57381a28abee158b5d79/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The data
Graban, 2013
![Page 12: Data-modeling Mindsets and the Digital Humanities](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042723/587d57381a28abee158b5d79/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
![Page 13: Data-modeling Mindsets and the Digital Humanities](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042723/587d57381a28abee158b5d79/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
![Page 14: Data-modeling Mindsets and the Digital Humanities](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042723/587d57381a28abee158b5d79/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
People (FOAF/EAC-CPF)
Organizations (Org Ontology/EAC-CPF)
Concepts/Topics (SKOS)
Locations (GeoNames/SKOS)
Artifacts (Dublin Core/EAD)
From MDMP to LWP
Texts? (TEI? )
Rhetorical activities? (CIDOC CRM?)
![Page 15: Data-modeling Mindsets and the Digital Humanities](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042723/587d57381a28abee158b5d79/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
People (FOAF/EAC-CPF)
Organizations (Org Ontology/EAC-CPF)
Concepts/Topics (SKOS)
Locations (GeoNames/SKOS)
Artifacts (Dublin Core/EAD)
Affiliations
Rhetorical activities as kinds of Events
citation
![Page 16: Data-modeling Mindsets and the Digital Humanities](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042723/587d57381a28abee158b5d79/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
People (FOAF/EAC-CPF)
Organizations (Org Ontology/EAC-CPF)
Concepts/Topics (SKOS)
Locations (GeoNames/SKOS)
Artifacts (Dublin Core/EAD)
Annotation Texts? (TEI? )
Description
Definition
Identification
Identification
Feminist Historiography
RecoveryProcess
Other “Scholarly Primitives”
![Page 17: Data-modeling Mindsets and the Digital Humanities](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042723/587d57381a28abee158b5d79/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
References• Graban, T. S. (2014). Re/Situating the Digital
Archive in John T. McCutcheon’s “Publics,” Then and Now. Peitho, 73.
• Graban, T. S. (2013). From Location(s) to Locatability: Mapping Feminist Recovery and Archival Activity through Metadata. College English, 76(2), 171–193.
• Riley, J., & Becker, D. (2010). Seeing Standards: A Visualization of the Metadata Universe. Indiana University Libraries. Retrieved from http://www.dlib.indiana.edu/~jenlrile/metadatamap/
•