data analysis retreat: may 19-21, 2010
DESCRIPTION
Data Analysis Retreat: May 19-21, 2010. School of Education Campbellsville University. Why? Standard 2: Assessment System and Unit Evaluation. The unit has an assessment system that collects and analyzes data on applicant qualifications, candidate performance, graduate performance and - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Data AnalysisRetreat: May 19-21, 2010
School of Education
Campbellsville University
Why? Standard 2: Assessment System and Unit Evaluation
• The unit has an assessment system that collects and analyzes data on
– applicant qualifications,– candidate performance, – graduate performance and– unit operations
• Purpose– to evaluate and improve the performance
of candidates, the unit and its programs.
Why? NCATE Standard 2b:
• Candidate assessment data are regularly and systematically collected, compiled, aggregated, summarized and analyzed to
– Improve candidate performance– Improve program quality– Improve unit operations
Why? NCATE Standard 2c
• The unit regularly and systematically uses data, including candidate and graduate performance information to evaluate the efficacy of its
– Courses– Programs– Clinical experiences
Why? NCATE Standard 2c
• The unit analyzes program evaluation and performance data to initiate changes in
– Programs– Unit operations
Overview• Data for 2009
– Compared to 2006-2008
• Undergraduate Programs– CAPs 1, 2, 3, 4 – Praxis II – Diversity Proficiencies
• Graduate Programs: MAE/SED/Rank I– CAPs 5, 6 and 7
• Faculty/Course Evaluations
CAP 1: Admission to TE 2009
• Number AdmittedSp09: 27 F09: 22 2009 Total: 49Analysis: 9-14 < previous three yearsAnalysis: 9-14 < previous three years
• GPASp09 3.46 F09 3.44 09 Av. 3.45 06-08 Av. 3.40> previous three years> previous three years
CAP 1 Competency Exams: 2009
ACT PPST: R PPST: M PPST: WSP09 23.60 177.20 174.60 175.60
F09 23.28 176.25 172.25 173.75
09 Av. 23.45 176.78 173.56 174.78
06-09 Av.
23.51 177.21 174.53 174.58
Analysis < 07, 08
<06Overall average
>06
< 07, 08
<overall average
>previous 3 years and overall average
< 06, 07
>08 & overall average
CAP 1 Dispositions 2009
• Average 2009 4.36• Average 2006-2009 4.17
• Sp 09 4.35 ; F 09 4.37• Highest (4) Honest/Ethical 4.53
(1) Caring 4.40• Lowest (3) Values Ind. Differences 4.27
(5) Responsible Class. Behavior 4.27
CAP 1 Dispositions 2009SP/Fall 2009
AverageAnalysis
Overall 4.35, 4.37 4.36 < all previous
1-Caring 4.48, 4.37 4.40 < all previous
2-Respects 4.35, 4.39 4.37 <all previous
3- Values individual
Differences*
4.25, 4.28 4.27 < all previous
4-Honest & ethical
4.56, 4.52 4.53 <all previous
5.Responsible Classroom Behavior*
4.21, 4.29 4.27 <all previous
CAP 1 Interviews 2009Overall
Interview
GPA Disposi-tions
Experience
Oral
Comm.
*Impact/Student
Learning
Sp09 4.00 3.47 4.27 3.60 4.20 3.53
F09 4.56 3.70 4.40 4.30 4.20 4.30
09 Av. 4.22 3.56 4.32 3.88 4.20 3.84
06-09 Av.
3.96 3.43 4.04 3.53 4.11 3.55
Analysis > Previous years
> Previous years
> Previous years
>
Previous years
> Previous years
F09 >
Previous years
CAP 1: Admission by Major 2009Major # Adm.09 Analysis
P-5 Sp=7; F=4
(11)
< last three years F09 ‘way’ down
5-9
Opt.1
Eng 3
Math 3
Sc 1; SocSt 1
F09=8
<previous 3 years
2 in fall 09
1 English; 1 Math.
5-9
Opt. 2
0 06=8
07=4
08=2
8-12 Eng=1/2
Math=3/1
Bio=1/0
Chem=0/1
SS=2/5
E=3,1, 6
M=3, 4, 4
B= 0, 1, 2
SS= 6, 7, 3
1 chemistry last four years; biology & chemistry lowest
P-12 Art=0/2
Music=4/3
PE=1/1
Health=2/1
Art=2, 3, 1
Music=10, 5, 10
PE=5, 5, 5
Health=0, 0, 0
Art/ Physical Education- lowest for admissions
CAP 1: Diversity 2009• Age: most common range—16-25, 83/91% • Gender 76% females ; 24% males • Ethnicity 96/91% white;
Black 4%; Hispanic 2%• Exceptionality 26% < previous
21% GT; .5% LD; 1% visual; .5 ADD; 76% unidentified
• 2nd Language 15% 7% Spanish
• Religion Baptist- 59%; Christian-26%;
Catholic-7%; Methodist-4%
CAP 1: Diversity 2009• Live at home: 13%, < all previous • Work: 30%, < all previous• Income:
80% Blank
2% 25,401-42,802
9% 42,803-67,326
More did not answer.
• FatherHigh school: 65%; College: 11%; Graduate: 11%
• Mother:High school: 54 %; College: 22%; Graduate: 13%
CAP 2: Continuation in TE 2009• 39 Approved
– Overall GPA: • 3.40/3.29 3.36 average• < all previous and 06-09 average
– Professional GPA:• 3.75/3.70 3.73 average• < all previous
– Field Hours: 40, > previous– PPD Hours: 11, > previous
CAP 2 Dispositions 2009SP/Fall 2009
AverageAnalysis
1-Caring 4.52, 4.13 4.43 < 07
2-Respects 4.54, 4.18 4.45 <08
3- Values individual
Differences*
4.49, 4.18 4.42 < all previous
4-Honest & ethical
4.66, 4.35 4.59 >all previous
5.Responsible Classroom Behavior*
4.43, 4.35 4.41 <08
CAP 3: 2009Admission to Student Teaching
• Total 2009: 47 • GPA:
– Overall GPA: 3.39 – Major GPA: 3.42– Prof. GPA: 3.77
• Dispositions: – Overall: 4.59 – Education Professor: 4.24 – Cooperating Teacher: 4.77 – Self Evaluation: 4.53– Instrument changed fall, 2006
CAP 3: Field/PPD Hours 2009• Total: Field hours-130.35; PPD-32.57
• Type:• Assisting 96%, consistently high• Instructing 91%, consistently high• Observing 96%, consistently high• Research 55%, comparable to previous• Tutoring 64%, < f08• Participating in education related community events• Interacting with families of students• Attending school board meetings
• Diversity:• Ethnicity 92%, comparable to 06 & 08• Exceptionality 89%, < previous years• Gender 89%• Linguistic * 55%, < previous• Race 81%, < 07, 08• Religious 62%• Socio-econ. 87%
CAP 3 Portfolio Holistic Scores
2.22.32.42.52.62.72.82.9
3
F2008
2009
CAP 3: Portfolios 2009• Portfolio Mean Holistic Score 2.49
< fall, 2008 2.70• Changeover to KTS in fall 2008
• 2009 Highlights– Highest
• KTS 3 Climate 2.90• KTS 1 Content 2.78
– Lowest• KTS 5 Assessment 2.44• KTS 7 Reflection 2.46• KTS 8 Collaboration 2.54
CAP 3 Portfolios Holistic Scores: Past
NTS-Spring, 2008
Highest – NTS 4 Assessment 2.73– NTS 2 Climate 2.68
Lowest – NTS 5 Reflection 2.54– NTS 6 Collaboration 2.46
– NTS 3 Implement 2.42
KTS Fall, 2008Highest
– KTS 3 Climate 2.91– KTS 10 Leadership 2.85
Lowest– KTS 5 Assessment 2.51
P-5 CAP 3 Portfolios 2008-09
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3
Holis
ticSc
ore
KTS
1Co
nten
t
KTS
2De
sign
KTS
3Cl
imat
e
KTS
4De
sign
KTS
5As
sess
KTS
6Te
chno
logy
KTS
7Re
flect
KTS
8Co
llabo
rate
KTS
9 Pr
of.
Gro
wth
KTS
10Le
ader
ship
Fall 2008
Year,2009
5-9 CAP 3 Portfolio Scores 2008-09
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3
Holis
ticSc
ore
KTS
1Co
nten
t
KTS
2De
sign
KTS
3Cl
imat
e
KTS
4De
sign
KTS
5As
sess
KTS
6Te
chno
logy
KTS
7Re
flect
KTS
8Co
llabo
rate
KTS
9 Pr
of.
Gro
wth
KTS
10Le
ader
ship
Fall 2008
Year, 2009
8-12 CAP 3 Portfolio Scores 2008-09
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3
Holis
ticSc
ore
KTS
1Co
nten
t
KTS
2De
sign
KTS
3Cl
imat
e
KTS
4De
sign
KTS
5As
sess
KTS
6Te
chno
logy
KTS
7Re
flect
KTS
8Co
llabo
rate
KTS
9 Pr
of.
Gro
wth
KTS
10Le
ader
ship
Fall 2008
Year, 2009
P-12 CAP 3 Portfolio Scores, 2008-09
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3
Holis
ticSc
ore
KTS
1Co
nten
t
KTS
2De
sign
KTS
3Cl
imat
e
KTS
4De
sign
KTS
5As
sess
KTS
6Te
chno
logy
KTS
7Re
flect
KTS
8Co
llabo
rate
KTS
9 Pr
of.
Gro
wth
KTS
10Le
ader
ship
Fall 2008
Year, 2009
CAP 3: Portfolios by Majors- 2009
• Comparisons:– P-5:
• Highest KTS 3 Climate; Lowest KTS 4 Design
– 5-9 • Highest KTS 3 Climate; Lowest KTS 6 Technology,
KTS 5 Assessment
– 8-12:• Highest KTS 3 Climate; Lowest KTS 5 Assessment
KTS 7 Reflection
– P-12:• Highest KTS 3 Climate; Lowest KTS 8 Collaboration
KTS 5 Assessment
CAP 3 Portfolio Scores 2009
22.12.22.32.42.52.62.72.82.9
3
P-5Grades 5-9Grades 8-12Grades P-12
CAP 3 Growth Areas 2009
• KTS 5 Assessment– Communicating learning results 2.14– Allows student self assessment 2.20
• KTS 7 Reflection– Uses data to reflect and identify areas
for professional growth 2.26
CAP 4: 2009• 63 Approved Spring/Fall
Represents a steady increase over last four years
• Cumulative GPA: 3.55> than previous
• Major GPA: 3.62 (3.70/3.49)Overall > than last four years; f09 is <last two years
• Professional GPA: 3.76Comparable to previous
CAP 4 Clinical Experiences 2009
• Diversity– Ethnicity 97% >08, 07– Exceptionality 95% – Language 67% (59/81%) <– Race 92% < 08, 07– Religion: 76% >– Socioeconomic: 98% >– Gender: 98% > than previous
CAP 4 Clinical Experiences 2009
• Assisting: 100% > last 2• Instructing: 100% = to previous• Observing: 98% > 08, 06• Research: 75% < 06, 07• Tutoring: 79% < previous• Attend school board meetings• Interacting with families• Participate in education related
community events
CAP 4 Dispositions 2009* F06: New Instrument
Analytic
SP/F
Analysis
Overall 4.82/4.64 > 06,07; < 08
1. Caring 4.81/4.62 > 06,07; < 08
2. Respects 4.88/4.70 > 06, 07; < 08
3. Values ind. Diff.*
4.72/4.54 > 06, 07; < 08
4. Honest & ethical
4.93/4.74 > 06; < 08, =07
5. Responsible* 4.75/4.57 > 06, 07; < 08
CAP 4: Dispositions
2009
Holistic
Analysis
Cooperating Teacher 1
4.81 > 06, 07; < 08
Cooperating Teacher 2
4.73 > 06, < 08, 07
Supervising Teacher
4.63 > 06, < 08
Self Evaluation 4.85 > 08, 07, 06
CAP 4 Dispositions 2009
Univ. Supv. Self
• #1 Caring 4.62 4.87
• #2 Respects others 4.63 4.90
• #3 Values indiv. Diff.* 4.52 4.76
• #5 Honest/ethical 4.78 4.92
• #6 Responsible 4.57 4.77
classroom behavior*
CAP 4 Portfolios Fall 2009Holistic: 2.90/2.79
Analysis
KTS 1 2.92/2.77 2nd Highest (Content)
KTS 2 2.81/2.76
KTS 3 3.00/2.92 Highest (Climate)
KTS 4 2.89/2.78
KTS 5* 2.80/2.69 2nd Lowest (Assess.)
KTS 6 2.81/2.54 (Lowest NTS)
KTS 7* 2.79/2.80 Lowest (Reflection)
KTS 8 2.84/2.85
KTS 9 2.91/2.92 (Highest NTS)
KTS 10 2.91/2.81
CAP 4: Portfolios by Major, 2009Portfolio Scores: KTS
P-5 2.95 <5-9 3.00 8-12– Biology– English 2.33 <– Math 3.00– Soc. St. 2.75 <
P-12– Art 3.00– Music 2.82 <– PE 3.00
CAP 4 Portfolio Growth Areas 2009• KTS 5
– Lowest is ‘Communicates learning results’– Next lowest are ‘Describes, analyzes and
evaluates performance data’ &
‘Allows student self assessment’
• KTS 7– Lowest: ‘Uses data to reflect on and
identify areas for professional growth’
CAP 4: Univ. Supv./Coop. Tchr, Eval. 1-3 2008
NTS/KTS Univ. S Coop.T Analysis
KTS 1 Content 2.55-2.94 2.64/2.96 CT-Improved from MT to final
KTS 2 Design 2.61-2.95 2.71/3.00
KTS 3 Climate 2.72-2.92 2.79/3.00
KTS 4 Implement
2.44-2.88 2.59/2.98 CT-Improved most
KTS 5 Assessment
2.33-2.85 2.58/2.90 CT-Began lowest
KTS 6 Technology
2.69-2.89 2.77/2.98
KTS 7 Reflection
2.40-2.95 2.66/2.91
KTS 8 Collaboration
2.33-2.98 2.79/2.93 US-3rd most improved
KTS 9 Professional Gr
2.21-3.00 2.58/2.95 US-began lowest
US-most improved
KTS 10 Leadership
_____________
Holistic A + B
2.30-2.98 2.72.2.92
________
2.56/2.96
US-2nd most improved
CAP 4: Video Evaluations-Prof./Self
KTS Professor Self
EvaluationAnalysis
KTS 1
Content2.89/2.90 2.87/3.00
KTS 2
Design2.94/2.67 2.89/3.00
KTS 3
Climate2.91/2.85 2.92/3.00
KTS 4 Implement
2.82/2.86 2.68/3.00 Self-lowest overall
Professor-2nd lowest overall
KTS 5
Assess2.91/2.72 2.81/3.00 Self-2nd lowest overall
Professor-lowest overall
KTS 6
Technology3.00/2.81 2.88/3.00
CAP 4: Interview Ratings 2009Indicator Rating Trend over semestersPoised 4.79 > Last 2 years, highest
Articulate 4.56 < Last 2 years
Content Knowledge
4.54 < than 2/3
Pedagogy 4.49 > 2/3 years, lowest over time
Reflection 4.59 > Last 3 years
Q1: Meet KTS
4.54 > Last 2 years
Q2: Student Learning
Overall
4.45
4.56
Previous yearsPrevious years
CAP 4: Praxis Data--2009
• PLT: Passing Score of 161– P-5: 0522 177.58 < 06, 08– 5-9: 0523
• English-168; Math-180; Science; 176; Soc. St. 181• Soc. St/English-185; Math/Soc.St.-180
– 8-12: 0524 • English-158; Biology-179; Soc. St.-176; Math-184
– P-12 (Choice)• Music 169• Art 169• PE/Health 174
CAP 4: Praxis II Data 2009
• Level Passing Mean• P-5 148 168.42• 5-9
– English 158 159– Math 148 166– Science 144 148– Social St. 149 154– SocSt/Eng 149/158 160/192– Math/SocSt 148/149 166/168
Praxis II Data 2009 Passing Mean• Biology 146 185• English 160/155 181/158• Math 125/141 139/161• SocSt. 151/159 163/165
• Art 154/158 160/161• Music 145/154 148/161• PE/Hlth 147/151/630 152/158/677
Diversity Proficiencies: NTS Sp, 2008NTS CAP3
Port.CAP4 Port.*
NTS CAP4 Video CAP4 Co.T
CAP4 Un.T
1c 2.55 2.60 1-4,5 4.67 4.55
1d 2.87 2.85 4.62
1f 2.65 2.73
2b 2.74 2.85 2-3 4.78 4.40
2d 2.83 2.85
3c 2.57 2.49 3-4 4.64
3d 2.75 2.60
4d 2.67 2.58 4-1 4.61
5a 2.71 2.83 5-1 4.73
6a 2.58 2.70 8-2,5 4.73
8c 2.54 2.68 8-1,3 4.47 4.64 4.31
8e 2.63 2.73 9-9 4.58 4.20
9d 2.54 2.48 9-8 3.93 4.70
Diversity Proficiencies: KTS 2008/09KTS CAP 3
Portfolio
CAP 4 Portfolio
Coop.
Teacher
Univ. Supervisor
Video Evaluation
Indicator
1b 2.64/ 2.65
2.73/ 2.70
2.81*/ 2.84
2.77/ 2.88
2.76 2.72/2.78
Connects content to life experiences
1d 2.49/ 2.50
2.58*/ 2.83
2.82/ 2.83
2.79/ 2.86
2.62
2.72/2.68
Guides students to understand content from various perspectives.
2b 2.55/ 2.58
2.84/ 2.81
2.86/ 2.85
2.90/ 2.93
2.69
2.78/2.70
Uses contextual data to design instruction relevant to students.
3c 2.77/ 2.67
2.84/ 2.80
2.88/ 2.88
2.77/ 2.81
2.78
2.71/2.80
Values & supports student diversity & addresses individual needs
4b 2.43*/ 2.33*
2.78/ 2.67
2.82/ 2.80**
2.67*/ 2.85**
2.45*2.69*/2.76
Implements instruction based on diverse student needs and ….
5c 2.73/ 2.38*
2.81/ 2.50*
2.91/ 2.85
2.80/ 2.73*
2.682.81/2.65*
Regularly integrates technology …meet diverse student needs.
CAP 1 IECE: Fall 2009• Approved: 29 all locations• Overall GPA: 3.37• ACT: 22.13• PPST: 176.25 Reading 172.75 Mathematics 174.50 Writing
Note: IECE programs began in Fall 2009. Data for IECE are presented separately from other data; the IECE data will also be disaggregated by location.
CAP 2: IECE Fall, 2009
• Number approved: 6
• Grade point average: 3.40
• Foundations courses: 3.77
• Field Hours: 177.50
• PPD Hours: 20.25
IECE: Diversity Data 2009
• Age: 42% 26-35 38% 16-25%• Gender: 100% F• Exceptionality: 97% no• 2nd language:
100% No
• Father: 12% College• Mother: 27% College• Religion:
– 42% Christian– 24% Baptist– 15% Catholic– 9% Methodist
IECE Disposition Data: Fall, 2009
Prof. Prof. Prof. Self Overall
• Caring: 4.0 4.83 4.85 4.63 4.76
• Respects: 4.0 4.50* 4.85 4.69 4.63
• Values: 4.0 4.71 4.62* 4.56* 4.63
• Honest: 5.0 4.92 4.85 4.88 4.89
• ProfResp. 5.0 4.46 4.83 4.63 4.60*
MAE: CAP 5 Admission 2009
• 2009: 2 (13-2008)<from previous
• GPA: 3.69> all previous years
• Dispositions Mean: 5.00> all previous
MAE: CAP 6 & 7, 2009
• CAP 6 Continuation– Number approved: 9– Number of hours completed: 19– GPA: 3.96
• CAP 7 Exit – Number approved: 14– GPA: 3.93– Action Research project grade: 93.71/94.38<
previous year
MAE: Diversity Data 2009• Age: 60%-26-35; others 16-25
• Gender: 82% female, > previous
• Race/Ethnicity: 100% white
• Exceptionality: 0%, < previous
• Father’s Education: 100% HS
• Mother’s Education: 35% College
• Second Language: 0%
• Religion: – 40% Baptist– 25% Methodist– 20% Christian
Rank I Data: 2009/08• CAP 5:
– Number admitted 13/9• DOSE certification: 2/4• Gifted endorsement: 2/2• Professional specialty: 9/3
– GPA: 3.90/3.84
• CAP 6:– Number approved: 7; GPA: 3.96
• CAP 7:– Number approved: 7; GPA 3.95
Rank 1 Diversity Data 2009
• Age: 50% 36-45; 44% 26-35• Gender: 99% female• Race: 100% white• Exceptionality: 20% (66% GT; Asthma 33%)
• Father: 58% hs; 31% college• Mother: 66% hs; 32% college• 2nd Langauge: 7% Spanish• Religion: 46% Baptist; 25% Christian;
12% Catholic
Rank 1 Program Data 2009
• Dispositions:– CAP 5: 4.41– CAP 6: 4.52– CAP 7: 4.78– Overall: 4.60
• Culminating Project Average: 198/200
SED TRAC 2 Data 2009• CAP 1
– Admitted 06 & 07: 6– GPA: 3.75
• CAP 2– Approved 06 & 07: 7– GPA: 3.14– Field Hours: 73
• CAP 3– Approved 06-08: 6– GPA: 3.17– Field Hours: 103.14
SED TRAC 2 DATA 2009 Field Experiences CAP 3 CAP 4
– Assisting: 23% 100%– Instructing: 57% 100%– Observing: 57% 50%– Research: 55% 50%– Race/Ethnicity: 100% 50%– Exceptionality: 57% 100%– Gender: 57% 50%– Language: 2% 0%– Religion: 2% 0%– Socioeconomic -- 50%
SED TRACs 3 & 4 Data 2009• CAP 5
– 61 admitted (48-T3; 13-T4)
< previous years– Undergraduate GPA
• T3: 2.87; T4: 2.70 < than previous
– GRE• Verbal: T3: 363; T4: 334
T3> than previous; T4 < previous• Quantitative: T3: 375; T4: 385
< 08• Analytical: T3: 3.45; T4: 3.13
T3: >previous years: T4: < previous years
SED CAP 6 Tracs 3 & 4--2009
Approved 59/79
T3: 43;
T4: 16
< 06, 08
GPA T3: 3.91
T4: 3.66
T3: <07, 08
T4: < previous
Field Hours
T3: 38
T4: 38
>06, 07
< 08
SED: TRACs 3 & 4, CAP 7 2009
Approved T3: 38; T4: 22
Total: 60
< previous
GPA T3: 3.88; T4: 3.83 Similar
Field Hrs. T3: 72; T4: 45 <07, 08
Praxis II 0353: 157 Pass
T3: 159; T4: 167
0542: 172 Pass
T3: 180; T4: 179
T3 < previous
T4> 07, 08
SED: TRACs 3 & 4 Diversity 2009Age 56%: 26-35 years
15%: 16-25 years
22%: 36-45 years
Similar to previous years and average
Difference in Trac 3 & 4
Gender 73%F 27% male Fewer males than previously
Ethnicity 85.0% White
12.5% Black
2.5% Asian
Whites increasing
Exceptionality
0% < previous
Income 28%-$25-43,000
17%-$10-25,000
15%-$42-67,000
Fewer in lower two brackets
Father 55%-High School
19%-College
Similar to previous years
SED TRACs 3 & 4 Diversity 2009
Mother 59%-HS
8%-College
19%-Graduate
> Graduate
Language 4% Yes < previous
Spanish
Religion 29%-Baptist
30%-Christian
8%-Catholic
14%-Methodist
Fewer Methodists
SED: TRACs 3 & 4, CAP 7 Portfolios 2009KTS 1 2.76 Content: > 06-08
KTS 2 2.76 Design: > 06-08
KTS 3 2.81 Climate: > 06-08 Highest
KTS 4 2.76 Implement: > 06-08
KTS 5 2.62 Assess: > 06-08
KTS 6 2.58 Technology: > 06, 08; < 07 Lowest
KTS 7 2.63 Reflect: > 06-08
KTS 8 2.70 Collaborate: > 06-08
KTS 9
KTS 10
2.70
2.73Professional Growth: > 06, 07
Leadership: NA
SED TRACs 5 & 6, CAP 5 2009
Approved T5: 42; T6: 7
Total 49
> 06, 07; < 08
GPA 3.37/3.06
3.85/4.0
T5: > previous; T6 < 08, 06
Age 50%: 26-35
36%: 16-25
Fewer from 36-45 years
Gender 53%-Female
47%-Male
Number of males increasing
Ethnicity 74%-White
10%-Hispanic
15%-Black
> Blacks
Except. 0% Yes > 07, 05; GT, Hearing, Visual
SED: TRACs 5 & 6 Data 2009CAP 6: # App. 54 Comparable to 08; >
07, 06
GPA 3.83/3.88
Field Hours 33/37 <07, 08
CAP 7: # App. 43, 8 More T5, Fewer T6
GPA 3.88/3.92 Comparable
Field Hours 68/71 Comparable
Praxis II 0353 T5--176.84
T6--179.67> previous
0542 T5--184.6
T6—177.8T5<08, >06, 07
T6 < 07, 08; >06
Faculty Evaluations: Fall, 2008• All scores 4.0 & above, except 24 (Class.)• Highest scoring questions
– Q14: 4.55 Provides prompt feedback– Q11: 4.53 Communicates effectively…– Q16: 4.44 Available during office hours
• Lowest scoring questions– Q10: 4.00 Communicates interest in course…– Q1: 4.03 Objectives/requirements made clear– Q13: 4.09 Routinely holds class full period
• Scores lower than campus wide– Q10: -.26—Communicates interest; – Q1: -.24—Objectives requirements made clear– Q2: -.08 (Relates); Q3: -.05 (Mat.); Q17: -.05 (Compared.)
Faculty Evaluation Data f09• Regular Program:
– Instructor give sufficient number of tests to ensure fair evaluation (4.15/4.28)
– Materials are utilized (4.23/4.27)
• SED– I feel free to raise questions and participate
(3.70)– Variety of presentation techniques (3.97)
• ECE– Grading practices are fair (4.60/4.28)
• IECE– Course is well organized (4.20/4.25)
Additional Data Needed• Faculty Evaluations
– Evidence of using data for program improvement
• Plan for Follow-up Surveys of recent grads from all programs
• SACS: employment status of graduates
Title II UpdateWestat: Federal Database• Admission/completion/certified
• Annual Goals– Shortage areas of math, science, special education, ELL
instruction
• 7 Assurances1. Training responds to needs of local educational agencies2. Training linked to needs of schools3. Core academic subjects4. Training for children with disabilities, 5. Limited English proficiency 6. Low income families, 7. Urban/rural schools
Summary: Growth AreasTraditional Programs
– Dispositions: Lowest at CAP 1, 3 and 4• 3. Values individual differences• 5. Demonstrates responsible classroom behavior
– CAP 1 & 4 Interviews: • Impact on student learning (3.84/4.45)
– KTS (CAP 3 & 4, Video)• Assessment (communicates learning results)
– CAP 3 lowest for overall,5-9, 8-12, P-12, SED
• Reflection (using data for pd)– CAP 3 lowest for overall 2.46
– Diversity• 4b implement instruction based on individual student
needs• 5c regularly integrate technology to meet diverse student
needs• Ensure field/clinical experiences with linguistic diversity
Summary: MAE/Rank I Growth Areas
• MAE:– Data on major assessments used in the
program-Action Research project– Capability to show evidence of KTS– Diversity: 100% white
• Rank I– Collect evidence of KTS
Summary: Growth Areas-SED
• TRACs 3 & 4:– Portfolio: KTS 5/6 lowest (assessment &
technology)
• TRACs 5 & 6:– Major assessment data for KTS
Growth Areas: Progress• Collaboration: improvement
• New Teacher Survey– Old: #2 Community/background in planning
• Improved; still –.12
– New: #5 Designing/Using formative assessments to provide feedback to students and guide their learning -.18
• Diversity– Recruit diverse candidates and faculty
• Need to reinstate Pathways or other ‘good faith efforts’
– Implement unit diversity plan