dagan asrm 2009 abstract o268

13
Comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage Dagan Wells, PhD, FRCPath [email protected]

Upload: smunne

Post on 12-Nov-2014

1.055 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

clinical results after the use of CGH, blastocyst biopsy and vitrification: implantation improves from 28% to 67% (p

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Dagan Asrm 2009 Abstract O268

Comprehensive chromosomal screening at the blastocyst stage

Dagan Wells, PhD, FRCPath

[email protected]

Page 2: Dagan Asrm 2009 Abstract O268

Less than half the chromosomes tested

Spreading requires skill and can be inconsistent

Limitations of conventional embryo screening techniques

Cells are in interphase

Mosaicism

Limited range of fluorochromes

Poses a significant problem for diagnosis. However, most mosaic cleavage stage embryos are aneuploid in every cell.

- use FISH

Cleavage stage biopsy may represent a cost to the embryo

Page 3: Dagan Asrm 2009 Abstract O268

Kallioniemi et al 1992; Wells et al 1999, 2002; Voullaire et al 1999; Wilton et al 2001; Gutierrez et al 2004, 2005; Fragouli et al 2006, 2007

• Technique related to FISH

• Allows the copy number of every chromosome to be determined

Normal Trisomy Monosomy

Normal DNATest DNA

Comparative genomic hybridization- CGH

Gai

n

Los

sN

orm

al

Chromosome 15

Page 4: Dagan Asrm 2009 Abstract O268

Embryo screening using CGH

• All chromosomes tested

Benefits

• DNA-based

• No spreading of cells on slides

But what about mosaicism and the impact of biopsy?

Page 5: Dagan Asrm 2009 Abstract O268

Comprehensive chromosome screening of blastocysts

Trophectoderm biopsy-

3-10 cells (mean 5) biopsied and tested

Courtesy of M. Katz-Jaffe and J. Stevens, CCRM

Page 6: Dagan Asrm 2009 Abstract O268

Diagnosis more robust and accurate

• Biopsy of several cells is possible

Less risk of misdiagnosis due to mosaicism

Analysis of blastocyst stage

• Can overcoming the principal challenges to accurate screening allow PGS to fulfill the potential predicted by theory?

Reduced impact of embryo biopsy

• Blastocyst cryopreservation (vitrification) necessary

Comprehensive chromosome screening of blastocysts

Page 7: Dagan Asrm 2009 Abstract O268

•Near 100% survival after biopsy, freeze and thaw

• 170 patients, mean age 38 years, 1-6 previous failed IVF cycles (mean 2)

• Pregnancy rate per cycle with transfer 87%

• Birth rate per cycle with transfer 79%

• Implantation rate per embryo 67%

Blastocyst CGH- clinical results

72%

60%

28% *

Control group matched for: maternal age, day-3 FSH, day of transfer, # oocytes retrieved, # of failed cycles

*p<0.0003 - Extremely promising for single embryo transfer

Page 8: Dagan Asrm 2009 Abstract O268

• Embryo loss rates are low

• 91% of embryos that produced a fetal sac resulted in an ongoing third trimester pregnancy or live birth

• 97% of embryos that produced a fetal heart beat resulted in an ongoing third trimester pregnancy or live birth

• Expected pregnancy loss rate for IVF patients in this age range is ~25%

Blastocyst CGH- rates of pregnancy loss

Page 9: Dagan Asrm 2009 Abstract O268

Blastocyst CGH- Pregnancy rates

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

30-34 35-38 39-42 43-500

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Positive pregnancy per transfer

Positive pregnancy per cycle with biopsy

Pregnancy rate per transfer shows only a small decline with advancing age

Pregnancy rate per cycle shows a significant decline

Page 10: Dagan Asrm 2009 Abstract O268

Blastocyst CGH- aneuploidy and implantation rates

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

30-34 35-38 39-42 43-500

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Implantation rate

Aneuploidy rate

Cycles with all embryos aneuploid

Why does age still lead to reduced pregnancy rates despite aneuploidy screening?

Page 11: Dagan Asrm 2009 Abstract O268

• Pregnancy rates were above those typically achieved for all age groups.

• However, pregnancy rates were lower for older patients due to the increased frequency of cycles with no euploid embryos.

• Spontaneous abortion rates were reduced for all patients, including those with a history of multiple miscarriage

• Chromosomally normal embryos from older patients have a similar chance of producing a child as those derived from young patients.

• Aneuploidy is likely to be the principal factor causing reduced IVF success with advancing maternal age

Conclusions

Page 12: Dagan Asrm 2009 Abstract O268

• Can the results obtained in the current study be replicated in a randomized controlled trial?

• An RCT is currently underway

• What patient groups will benefit the most from this type of screening?

• Young patients may benefit, particularly in countries where single embryo transfer is mandatory

Questions

Page 13: Dagan Asrm 2009 Abstract O268

United Kingdom (Oxford)Elpida Fragouli

Samer Alfarawati

United States (Livingston, NJ)Pere Colls

Tomas EscuderoN-neka Esprit-Ngachou

Jill FischerCristina Gutierrez-Mateo

Santiago MunneRenata PratesJorge Sanchez

Sophia TormasiJohn Zheng

[email protected]

Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine

Mandy Katz-JaffeJohn Stevens

Bill Schoolcraft