d district antoinette cordova, v. and tory burch, llc,...oct 19, 2017  · tory burch, llc, et al.,...

2
No. 17-AA-978 llistrict of (!Columbia (!Court of ANTOINETTE CORDOVA, Petitioner, v. 2017 CRB 58 D.C. DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES Respondent, and TORY BURCH, LLC, et al., Intervenors. D fL OCT 1 9 2017 DISTRICT BEFORE: Thompson, Associate Judge, and Farrell and Reid, Senior Judges. ORDER On consideration of this court's September 20, 2017, order directing petitioner to show cause why this petition for review from the Compensation Review Board's August 3, 2017, Decision and Partial Remand Order should not be dismissed as having been taken from a non-final order, and no response having been filed, it is ORDERED that the petition for review is hereby dismissed as having been taken from a non-final order. See Washington Hospital Center v. District of Columbia Dep't of Emp 't Servs., 712 A.2d 1018, 1020 (D.C. 1998) and Warner v. Dep'tofEmp'tServs., 587A.2d1091, 1093 (D.C. 1991). This dismissal is without prejudice to petitioner seeking review upon entry of any final, adverse order by the Compensation Review Board. PERCURIAM

Upload: others

Post on 15-Oct-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: D DISTRICT ANTOINETTE CORDOVA, v. and TORY BURCH, LLC,...Oct 19, 2017  · TORY BURCH, LLC, et al., Intervenors. ~ D fL OCT 1 9 2017 DISTRICT BEFORE: Thompson , Associate Judge, and

No. 17-AA-978

llistrict of (!Columbia (!Court of ~ppeals

ANTOINETTE CORDOVA, Petitioner,

v. 2017 CRB 58

D.C. DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SERVICES

Respondent, and

TORY BURCH, LLC, et al., Intervenors.

~ D fL ~ OCT 1 9 2017

DISTRICT

BEFORE: Thompson, Associate Judge, and Farrell and Reid, Senior Judges.

ORDER

On consideration of this court's September 20, 2017, order directing petitioner to show cause why this petition for review from the Compensation Review Board's August 3, 2017, Decision and Partial Remand Order should not be dismissed as having been taken from a non-final order, and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review is hereby dismissed as having been taken from a non-final order. See Washington Hospital Center v. District of Columbia Dep't of Emp 't Servs., 712 A.2d 1018, 1020 (D.C. 1998) and Warner v. Dep'tofEmp'tServs., 587A.2d1091, 1093 (D.C. 1991). This dismissal is without prejudice to petitioner seeking review upon entry of any final, adverse order by the Compensation Review Board.

PERCURIAM

Page 2: D DISTRICT ANTOINETTE CORDOVA, v. and TORY BURCH, LLC,...Oct 19, 2017  · TORY BURCH, LLC, et al., Intervenors. ~ D fL OCT 1 9 2017 DISTRICT BEFORE: Thompson , Associate Judge, and

No. 17-AA-978

Copy e-served to:

Todd S. Kim, Esquire Solicitor General for DC

Copies mailed to:

Antoinette Cordova 161 7 26th Street S Apaiiment 2 Arlington, VA 22206

Laura S. McKenzie, Esquire 2 North Charles Street Suite 600 Baltimore, MD 21201

cml