curriculum part i.. three versions of curriculum subject centered teacher centered student centered

Download Curriculum Part I.. Three Versions of Curriculum Subject Centered Teacher Centered Student Centered

Post on 19-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents

5 download

Embed Size (px)

TRANSCRIPT

  • Slide 1
  • Curriculum Part I.
  • Slide 2
  • Three Versions of Curriculum Subject Centered Teacher Centered Student Centered
  • Slide 3
  • Slide 4
  • In my K-? Education, I have had. 1. All teacher-centered experiences of curriculum 2. Some Subject-centered experiences 3. Some student-centered experiences 4. An optimal blend of these varieties 5. A blend that had little rhyme or reason to recommend it
  • Slide 5
  • What is the nature of curriculum? Curriculum is something determined by experts and authorities. There is no right curriculum. Curriculum should reflect the real world, be practical, of use. There are many curricula we can learn and negotiate
  • Slide 6
  • Please make your selection... 1. Authorities /Experts Determine 2. There is no right curriculum 3. Curriculum should be the real world 4. There are many curricula we can learn
  • Slide 7
  • Definitions of Curriculum 1. Curriculum is all of the experiences children have under the guidance of teachers. 2. Curriculum encompasses all learning opportunities provided by school. 3. Curriculum is a plan for all experiences which the learner encounters in school. 4. Curriculum is subject to perspectives, debate, change
  • Slide 8
  • Discipline, Discourse, & Theory Discipline an area of study, with its own particular rules and expectations. E.G., the discipline of Economics, or History Discourse a system of statements that provide rules of information and sets of practices within a social milieu (Grant & Gillette, 2006). E.G. discourse of free-market capitalism. Theory an argument about how to think about a discipline or a discourse. Thinking about the Nature of our thinking metacognition. E.G. Theory of the novel, or Theory of Evolution, or Marxist Theory of History
  • Slide 9
  • Who owns the curriculum? A teacher in a public school is an employee of the district, which is an educational entity of the state. It is the state, the governor, the legislature (the state dept. of education or state board of education) which has ultimate responsibility over the curriculum.
  • Slide 10
  • CurriculumThomas Popkewitz I view curriculum as a particular, historically formed knowledge that inscribes rules and standards by which we reason about the world and our self as a productive member of that world. Curriculum is a disciplining technology that directs how the individual is to act, feel, talk, and see the world and the self. As such, curriculum is a form of social regulation.
  • Slide 11
  • Curriculum and Power Relationships Expert knowledge shapes our thinking about much in our daily life. We think of it as natural but it is notit is built from expert systems of thinking. We assume expert knowledge to be true.
  • Slide 12
  • I know for certain that 1. The earth revolves around the sun 2. My friend loves me 3. It is below zero outside 4. There is truth in the world 5. My senses give me factual information
  • Slide 13
  • Curriculum Standards Nothing newin 1909 E.L. Thorndike developed handwriting standards measuring students penmanship performance Standards consider content and performance and remove the need for teachers to guess or make inferences about what students need to know Content standards specify what students should know and be able to do Performance standards specify the evidence needed to demonstrate achievement Tendency toward conservative visions of back to basics since 1983 A Nation at Risk Report Tendency toward internationalism in curricular thinking
  • Slide 14
  • Standards and Curriculum Although most educatorsargue that these standards are not the curriculum, standards do suggest the learning experience and opportunities that students should have under the guidance of the teachers. for many teachers, the standards have become the fusion of teachers public, professional, and personal knowledge that disciplines their choices and possibilities, and must therefore be thought of as the effects of power.
  • Slide 15
  • The Overt Curriculum The overt curriculum is the open, or public, dimension and includes current and historical interpretations, learning experiences, and learning outcomes. Openly discussed, consciously planned, usually written down, presented through the instructional process Textbooks, learning kits, lesson plans, school plays etc.
  • Slide 16
  • Overt Curriculum Provides students with science, history, math, literature Provides students with the knowledge society wants them to havebeyond the academics Social Responsibilitythe overt curriculum should be societys messenger (Benjamin Franklin)
  • Slide 17
  • Societys Messsenger In the 1600sfor religious purposesOld Deluder Satan laws (1642) In order to organize what students should learn and teachers should teach, The New England Primer was published (1690) In the late 1700s and 1800s, Americanization 1900s Progressivism for Democracy in reforms founded on thinking of John Dewey E.D. Hirsch, Cultural Literacy
  • Slide 18
  • The Invisible (Hidden)Curriculum The processesthe noise by which the overt curriculum is transmitted they are also learning and modifying attitudes, motives, and values in relationship to the experiencesin the classroom. The nonacademic outcomes of formal education are sometimes of greater consequencethan is learning the subject matter.
  • Slide 19
  • Results of the Hidden Curriculum Notions of truth, ways of thinking, unstated implications Appraisals of self-worth Social Roles Middle-Class Perspectives Attitudes and Behavior Required for Work
  • Slide 20
  • I see myself 1. As an A kind of person 2. As a future leader in my field 3. As a hard worker 4. As a solid middle class member
  • Slide 21
  • The What Knowledge Debate Colonial moral education 19 th Century Americanization Early 20 th The Scopes trialbefore Scopes, religious faith was the common, if not universal, premise of American thought; after Scopes, scientific skepticism prevailed. A Nation at Risk (1983) return to the basics
  • Slide 22
  • The Null Curriculum When a topic is never taught: too unimportant too controversial too inappropriate not worth the time not essential
  • Slide 23
  • Extra or Co-curricula Beneficial to self-esteem Improved race relations Higher SAT scores, grades Better health for females, gender stereotypes undermined Higher career aspirations
  • Slide 24
  • The Whose Knowledge Debate our arguments over curriculum are also our arguments over who we are as Americans, including how we wish to represent ourselves to our children The Canondefining what is central and what is marginal
  • Slide 25
  • Curriculum Organization Societal levelpoliticians, special committees, experts Institutional levelset at the school, district, collegeusually set along subject matter disciplines Instructional levelteacher planning and teaching students Ideological levellearning theorists and subject matter specialists
  • Slide 26
  • The Reign of the Textbook Textbook adoption states Effects Economies of scale Censorship Mentioning Effect Inauthentic text Timeliness
  • Slide 27
  • Standards Movement Content Standards Whose content? Traditional versus Progressive Todaydebate over Scientifically Based Practices in education.
  • Slide 28
  • NCLB Annual Testing Academic Improvement Report Cards Faculty Qualifications
  • Slide 29
  • Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Underperforming by measurements Students and parents offered options Consequent Loss of Funding Browse State Website?
  • Slide 30
  • State Standards and Test are 1. Desirable, as they create accountability 2. A mistake, they dont measure real learning 3. Positive for unifying educational experience 4. Divisive and not representative of different groups experiences
  • Slide 31
  • Alfie Kohn Individuals lost in sea of tests Learning as exploration, creativity stifled Use of threats and bribery counter to ethical education. Shifting emphasis from real issues to surface issues Detract from teacher autonomy
  • Slide 32
  • Topics in Curriculum / Know these in terms of philosophy topics? Creationism versus Evolution Core Knowledge, the Canon, versus Multiculturalism Multiple Intelligences Critical Thinking Skills Metacognition Critical Pedagogy (and literacy)

Recommended

View more >