crystal reports - sample agency reportchildcareresults.com/downloads/...r_agency_report.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
DRDP-RSpring 2008 and Fall 2007
Preschool Board Level Report
Board/District/Agency Sample
BOARD DISTRICT 3
Prepared By:
About this Report:This report represents a snap-shot of the developmental levels of students in Board District 3. The outcomes of this report should be used as one of many tools to guide the curriculum planning process. The DRDP-R Tool and this report were not designed to "grade" the students, teachers, or the school and should not be used for those purposes.
About the Students: Fall 2007 Spring 2008
# of Students Included 74 139
% English Language 15% 10%Learners
% of Students with IEPs 10% 9%
Please see the Demographic Section at the end of the Report for more information on the students included in these assessments.
O r g a n iz at io n
www.childcareresults.com Page 1 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
About the Desired Results Developmental Profiles and Desired Results Process
Educators are trained in administering the Desired Results Child profiles. Educators assess the children using work samples, observation, and interactions with the child. A final developmental level for each measure is given to each child. Parent Surveys are distributed to Parents Results for each children and families are compiled within each classroom, center, agency, and contract. Program improvements plans are created, submitted, and implemented. Child assessments are repeated in the Winter and Spring and compared to Fall results.
Desired Results for the Developmental ProfilesDR1: Children are personally and socially competentDR2: Children are effective learnersDR3: Children show physical and motor competenceDR4: Children are safe and healthy
Desired Results for the Parent SurveyDR5: Families support their child’s learning and development (Parent Survey)DR6: Families achieve their goals (Parent Survey)
The Goals of the Desired Results Process
1) Identify the measures that demonstrate the achievement of desired results across the development areas for children from birth to age 13 in child care and development programs,
2) Provide information that reflects the contributions made by each of the various types of CDE-funded child development programs in achieving the desired results,
3) Hold programs accountable to Program Standards that support the achievement of desired results and are used to measure program quality,
4) Create a base of information on the relationships between processes and results which can be used to target technical assistance to improve practice in all child development programs.
www.childcareresults.com Page 2 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
A. Desired Results Comparison Member District 3 DRDP-R Report
Insert Desired Results Graph.
Children are effectivelearners
Children are personallyand socially competent
Children are safe andhealthy
Children show physicaland motor competence
36%50% 56%
73%
43%55%
62%73%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Desired Result ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
About this Page:Chart ignores any unrated measures. As a result of this and rounding error, this chart may differ from the tablesand charts in this report.
Note:Total Students Represented by Charts
139 65 74
Total Assessed in Spring 2008
Assessed in Spring 2008 Only
Assessed in Fall 2007 & Spring 2008
www.childcareresults.com Page 3 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
Self Awareness & Self ConceptSocial Interpersonal Skills
Self RegulationLanguage
LearningCognitive Competence
MathLiteracy
Motor SkillsSafety and Health
58%50% 46% 49% 44% 43% 38%
24%
73%
56%60% 57% 56% 50% 54% 50%43%
33%
73%62%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
A. Indicator Comparison
Students Assessed in Spring 2008
Students Assessed in Both Fall 2007 and Spring
Self Awareness & Self ConceptSocial Interpersonal Skills
Self RegulationLanguage
LearningCognitive Competence
MathLiteracy
Motor SkillsSafety and Health
60% 57% 56%50% 54% 50%
43%33%
73%62%
Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
139 65 74
Total Assessed in Spring 2008
Assessed in Spring 2008 Only
Assessed in Fall 2007 & Spring 2008
Member District 3 DRDP-R Report
About this Page:Chart ignores any unrated measures. As a result of this and rounding error, this chart may differ from the tablesand charts in this report.
Note:Total Students Represented by Charts
www.childcareresults.com Page 4 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
C. Self Awareness & Self Concept
##
##
Identity of self1. SELF 1
Recognition of own skills and accomplishments2. SELF 2
Measures Included in this Indicator:
1. Member District 3 DRDP-R Indicator Detail
Female Male
66%
50%
71%
49%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Gender Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Non-ELL Students ELL Students
66%
50%
71%
49%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
English Language Learner Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Desired Result: Children are personally and socially competent
Indicator: Self Awareness & Self Concept (SELF) --Children show self-awareness anda positive self-concept
www.childcareresults.com Page 5 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
C. Self Awareness & Self Concept2. Member District 3 DRDP-R Gender and Ethnicity Detail
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian (Non-Latino) Latino Philipino Others
57% 63% 68%57%
100%
41%
73%
44%59% 64%
50% 50%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Girls by Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian (Non-Latino) Latino Philipino Others
57% 63% 68%57%
100%
41%
73%
44%59% 64%
50% 50%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Boys by Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
www.childcareresults.com Page 6 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
3. Member District 3 DRDP-R Pre-K DetailC. Self Awareness & Self Concept
Female Male
74%69%
89%
76%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Pre-K Gender Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Non-ELL Students ELL Students
74%69%
89%
76%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
English Language Learner Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian(Non-Latino)
Latino Philipino Others
56%
88%80%
73%
100%
50%
76%
56%
94%84%
100%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Pre-K Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
www.childcareresults.com Page 7 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
C. Social Interpersonal Skills
##
##
##
##
##
##
Expressions of empathy3. SOC 1
Building cooperative relationships with adults4. SOC 2
Developing friendships5. SOC 3
Building cooperative play with other children6. SOC 4
Conflict negotiation7. SOC 5
Awareness of diversity8. SOC 6
Measures Included in this Indicator:
1. Member District 3 DRDP-R Indicator Detail
Female Male
57%
46%
69%
46%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Gender Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Non-ELL Students ELL Students
57%
46%
69%
46%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
English Language Learner Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Desired Result: Children are personally and socially competent
Indicator: Social Interpersonal Skills (SOC) -- Children demonstrate effective social and interpersonal skills
www.childcareresults.com Page 8 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
C. Social Interpersonal Skills2. Member District 3 DRDP-R Gender and Ethnicity Detail
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian (Non-Latino) Latino Philipino Others
56% 59% 56%49%
100%
30%
73%
45%55%
64%53%
19%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Girls by Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian (Non-Latino) Latino Philipino Others
56% 59% 56%49%
100%
30%
73%
45%55%
64%53%
19%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Boys by Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
www.childcareresults.com Page 9 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
3. Member District 3 DRDP-R Pre-K DetailC. Social Interpersonal Skills
Female Male
62% 60%
89%
68%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Gender Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Non-ELL Students ELL Students
62% 60%
89%
68%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
English Language Learner Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian(Non-Latino)
Latino Philipino Others
56%
73% 68%57%
100%
50%
76%
58%
92%82%
100%
0%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Pre-K Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
www.childcareresults.com Page 10 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
C. Self Regulation
##
##
##
Taking turns10. REG 2
Shared use of space & materials11. REG 3
Impulse control9. REG 1
Measures Included in this Indicator:
1. Member District 3 DRDP-R Indicator Detail
Female Male
57%
37%
67%
46%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Gender Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Non-ELL Students ELL Students
57%
37%
67%
46%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
English Language Learner Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Desired Result: Children are personally and socially competent
Indicator: Self Regulation (REG) -- Children demonstrate effective self-regulation in their behavior
www.childcareresults.com Page 11 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
C. Self Regulation2. Member District 3 DRDP-R Gender and Ethnicity Detail
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian (Non-Latino) Latino Philipino Others
60%52%
60%
42%
100%
15%
72%
53% 52%59%
75%
15%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Girls by Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian (Non-Latino) Latino Philipino Others
60%52%
60%
42%
100%
15%
72%
53% 52% 59%75%
15%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Boys by Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
www.childcareresults.com Page 12 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
3. Member District 3 DRDP-R Pre-K DetailC. Self Regulation
Female Male
60%
50%
87%
68%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Gender Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Non-ELL Students ELL Students
60%
50%
87%
68%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
English Language Learner Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian(Non-Latino)
Latino Philipino Others
50%
67%73%
50%
100%
17%
81%
67%
88%77%
100%
0%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Pre-K Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
www.childcareresults.com Page 13 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
C. Language
##
##
##
##
Comprehends meaning12. LANG 1
Follows increasingly complex instructions13. LANG 2
Expresses self through language14. LANG 3
Uses language in conversation15. LANG 4
Measures Included in this Indicator:
1. Member District 3 DRDP-R Indicator Detail
Female Male
56%
42%
59%
41%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Gender Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Non-ELL Students ELL Students
56%
42%
59%
41%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
English Language Learner Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Desired Result: Children are personally and socially competent
Indicator: Language (LANG) -- Children show growing abilities in communication and language
www.childcareresults.com Page 14 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
C. Language2. Member District 3 DRDP-R Gender and Ethnicity Detail
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian (Non-Latino) Latino Philipino Others
50%59% 63%
41%
100%
41%
71%
33%
57% 52% 54%
11%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Girls by Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian (Non-Latino) Latino Philipino Others
50%59% 63%
41%
100%
41%
71%
33%
57% 52% 54%
11%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Boys by Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
www.childcareresults.com Page 15 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
3. Member District 3 DRDP-R Pre-K DetailC. Language
Female Male
62% 59%
82%
68%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Gender Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Non-ELL Students ELL Students
62% 59%
82%
68%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
English Language Learner Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian(Non-Latino)
Latino Philipino Others
56%
75% 75%
51%
100%
75%78%
56%
95%
73%
100%
0%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Pre-K Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
www.childcareresults.com Page 16 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
C. Learning
##
##
Curiosity and initiative16. LRN 1
Engagement & persistence17. LRN 2
Measures Included in this Indicator:
1. Member District 3 DRDP-R Indicator Detail
Female Male
52%
36%
69%
39%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Gender Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Non-ELL Students ELL Students
52%
36%
69%
39%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
English Language Learner Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Desired Result: Children are effective learners
Indicator: Learning (LRN) -- Children show interest, motivation, and persistence in their approaches tolearning
www.childcareresults.com Page 17 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
C. Learning2. Member District 3 DRDP-R Gender and Ethnicity Detail
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian (Non-Latino) Latino Philipino Others
33%44% 50% 49%
100%
32%
73%
32%
56% 62%50%
6%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Girls by Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian (Non-Latino) Latino Philipino Others
33%44% 50% 49%
100%
32%
73%
32%
56% 62%50%
6%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Boys by Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
www.childcareresults.com Page 18 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
3. Member District 3 DRDP-R Pre-K DetailC. Learning
Female Male
59%
47%
87%
64%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Gender Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Non-ELL Students ELL Students
59%
47%
87%
64%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
English Language Learner Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian(Non-Latino)
Latino Philipino Others
38%
75%
55% 52%
100%
75%82%
75%
94%
71%
100%
0%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Pre-K Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
www.childcareresults.com Page 19 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
C. Cognitive Competence
##
##
##
##
Memory & knowledge18. COG 1
Cause & effect19. COG 2
Engages in problem solving20. COG 3
Socio-dramatic play21. COG 4
Measures Included in this Indicator:
1. Member District 3 DRDP-R Indicator Detail
Female Male
50%
37%
61%
39%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Gender Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Non-ELL Students ELL Students
50%
37%
61%
39%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
English Language Learner Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Desired Result: Children are effective learners
Indicator: Cognitive Competence (COG) -- Children show cognitive competence and problem-solving skills through play and daily activities
www.childcareresults.com Page 20 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
C. Cognitive Competence2. Member District 3 DRDP-R Gender and Ethnicity Detail
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian (Non-Latino) Latino Philipino Others
46%53% 54%
40%
100%
27%
62%
34%
56% 55%43%
11%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Girls by Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian (Non-Latino) Latino Philipino Others
46%53% 54%
40%
100%
27%
62%
34%
56% 55%43%
11%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Boys by Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
www.childcareresults.com Page 21 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
3. Member District 3 DRDP-R Pre-K DetailC. Cognitive Competence
Female Male
57%50%
80%
58%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Gender Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Non-ELL Students ELL Students
57%50%
80%
58%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
English Language Learner Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian(Non-Latino)
Latino Philipino Others
58%
81%
68%
42%
100%
25%
72%
47%
89%
68%
100%
25%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Pre-K Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
www.childcareresults.com Page 22 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
C. Math
##
##
##
##
##
##
##
Number sense: Understands quantity and counting
22. MATH 1
Number sense: Math operations23. MATH 2
Shapes24. MATH 3
Time25. MATH 4
Classification26. MATH 5
Measurement27. MATH 6
Patterning28. MATH 7
Measures Included in this Indicator:
1. Member District 3 DRDP-R Indicator Detail
Female Male
45%
29%
52%
34%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Gender Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Non-ELL Students ELL Students
45%
29%
52%
34%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
English Language Learner Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Desired Result: Children are effective learners
Indicator: Math (MATH) -- Children demonstrate competence in real-life mathematical concepts
www.childcareresults.com Page 23 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
C. Math2. Member District 3 DRDP-R Gender and Ethnicity Detail
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian (Non-Latino) Latino Philipino Others
39%46% 52%
33%
0%
33%
55%
35% 41% 47% 50%
17%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Girls by Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian (Non-Latino) Latino Philipino Others
39%46% 52%
33%
0%
33%
55%
35% 41% 47% 50%
17%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Boys by Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
www.childcareresults.com Page 24 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
3. Member District 3 DRDP-R Pre-K DetailC. Math
Female Male
51%43%
77%
57%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Gender Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Non-ELL Students ELL Students
51%43%
77%
57%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
English Language Learner Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian(Non-Latino)
Latino Philipino Others
42%
71% 67%
39%
0%
57%69% 65%
82%
65%
100%
0%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Pre-K Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
www.childcareresults.com Page 25 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
C. Literacy
##
##
##
##
##
Interest in literacy29. LIT 1
Letter & word knowledge30. LIT 2
Emerging writing31. LIT 3
Concepts of print32. LIT 4
Phonological awareness33. LIT 5
Measures Included in this Indicator:
1. Member District 3 DRDP-R Indicator Detail
Female Male
32%
15%
38%
29%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Gender Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Non-ELL Students ELL Students
32%
15%
38%
29%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
English Language Learner Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Desired Result: Children are effective learners
Indicator: Literacy (LIT) -- Children demonstrate emerging literacy skills
www.childcareresults.com Page 26 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
C. Literacy2. Member District 3 DRDP-R Gender and Ethnicity Detail
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian (Non-Latino) Latino Philipino Others
21%
40% 37%20%
40%
13%
42%29%
37% 34% 40%
9%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Girls by Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian (Non-Latino) Latino Philipino Others
21%
40% 37%20%
40%
13%
42%29%
37% 34% 40%
9%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Boys by Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
www.childcareresults.com Page 27 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
3. Member District 3 DRDP-R Pre-K DetailC. Literacy
Female Male
37%
19%
62%
53%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Gender Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Non-ELL Students ELL Students
37%
19%
62%
53%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
English Language Learner Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian(Non-Latino)
Latino Philipino Others
25%
65%
44%
21%
40%
0%
60%52%
87%
51%60%
0%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Pre-K Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
www.childcareresults.com Page 28 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
C. Motor Skills
##
##
##
Gross motor movement34. MOT 1
Fine motor skills35. MOT 2
Balance36. MOT 3
Measures Included in this Indicator:
1. Member District 3 DRDP-R Indicator Detail
Female Male
75% 72%81%
65%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Gender Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Non-ELL Students ELL Students
75% 72%81%
65%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
English Language Learner Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Desired Result: Children show physical and motor competence
Indicator: Motor Skills (MOT) -- Children demonstrate an increased proficiency in motor skills
www.childcareresults.com Page 29 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
C. Motor Skills2. Member District 3 DRDP-R Gender and Ethnicity Detail
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian (Non-Latino) Latino Philipino Others
64%
100%
79%71%
100%
61%
80%
57%67%
80%
100%
59%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Girls by Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian (Non-Latino) Latino Philipino Others
64%
100%
79%71%
100%
61%
80%
57%67%
80%
100%
59%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Boys by Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
www.childcareresults.com Page 30 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
3. Member District 3 DRDP-R Pre-K DetailC. Motor Skills
Female Male
79%84%
95%
75%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Gender Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Non-ELL Students ELL Students
79%84%
95%
75%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
English Language Learner Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian(Non-Latino)
Latino Philipino Others
71%
100%90%
76%
100%
83%80%
58%
100%90%
33%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Pre-K Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
www.childcareresults.com Page 31 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
C. Safety and Health
##
##
##
Personal care routines37. SH 1
Personal safety38. SH 2
Understanding healthy lifestyle39. SH 3
Measures Included in this Indicator:
1. Member District 3 DRDP-R Indicator Detail
Female Male
64%
44%
75%
51%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Gender Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Non-ELL Students ELL Students
64%
44%
75%
51%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
English Language Learner Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Desired Result: Children are safe and healthy
Indicator: Safety and Health (SH) -- Children show an emerging awareness andpractice of safe and healthy behavior
www.childcareresults.com Page 32 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
C. Safety and Health2. Member District 3 DRDP-R Gender and Ethnicity Detail
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian (Non-Latino) Latino Philipino Others
47% 41%
78%
59%
100%
39%
78%
43%
64% 68% 67%
30%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Girls by Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian (Non-Latino) Latino Philipino Others
47% 41%
78%
59%
100%
39%
78%
43%
64% 68% 67%
30%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Boys by Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
www.childcareresults.com Page 33 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
3. Member District 3 DRDP-R Pre-K DetailC. Safety and Health
Female Male
68%
57%
89%
75%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Gender Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
Non-ELL Students ELL Students
68%
57%
89%
75%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
English Language Learner Indicator Comparison
Percentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two DevelopmentLevels
African American(Non-Latino)
Asian (Non-Latino) Caucasian(Non-Latino)
Latino Philipino Others
46%
60%
86%
62%
100%
33%
78%
60%
92%84%
100% 100%
Fall 2007 Spring 2008
Indicator
% o
f R
ati
ng
s
Pre-K Ethnicity Indicator ComparisonPercentage of Student Ratings in the Top Two Development Levels
www.childcareresults.com Page 34 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
D. Demographic InformationBoard District 3 DRDP-R Report
42%Latino
2%
Philipino
14%African American
(Non-Latino)13%Asian (Non-Latino)
20%
Caucasian(Non-Latino)
9%Others
EthnicityPercentage of Students by Ethnicity
72%English
17%Spanish
5%Farsi ( Persian )
4%Unknown
4%Others
LanguagePercentage of Students by Primary Language
50%Female
48%Male
1%Unknown
GenderPercentage of Students by Gender
1%IEP
99%No IEP
Special NeedsPercentage of Students with an IEP
www.childcareresults.com Page 35 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report
D. Demographic InformationBoard District 3 DRDP-R Report
4.632
4.517
4.615
4.028
3.810
4.118
4.244
4.325
4.119
4.493
4.550
4.343
3.95
4.32
3.73
3.917
4.08
3.89
Average Age: # of Students
African American
(Non-Latino)
Tota
l
Fem
ale
Mal
e
Asian (Non-Latino)
Tota
l
Fem
ale
Mal
e
Caucasian (Non-Latino)
Tota
l
Fem
ale
Mal
e
Latino
Tota
l
Fem
ale
Mal
e
Philipino
Tota
l
Fem
ale
Mal
e
Others
Tota
l
Fem
ale
Mal
e
Average Age and Number of Students by Ethnicity and Gender
Note: Age in Number of Years.
www.childcareresults.com Page 36 of 36Sample District/Agency/Board DRDP-R Report