crowsnest fire final version

10
Crowsnest Fires August 2003 Figure 1: Background image 1

Upload: mdaele

Post on 29-Jun-2015

330 views

Category:

Entertainment & Humor


0 download

DESCRIPTION

this one includes credits for graphics

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Crowsnest Fire final version

Crowsnest Fires

August 2003

Figure 1: Background image1

Page 2: Crowsnest Fire final version

Crowsnest Fires• The Origin of the Fire

– When: Aug. 2l, 2003.• Random seasonal wildfire • Changed direction and transformed into a giant fire.

Figure 2: Firelight2

Page 3: Crowsnest Fire final version

Crowsnest fires• Features of the Fire

– 6-km wall of flame– reached 50 m into the sky, – Equivalent energy of an atomic explosion every 30

minutes.

Figure 3: Aerial image3

Page 4: Crowsnest Fire final version

Crowsnest Firesan eye witness account

• Home Alone: Elaine Hruby, – Husband up north in Fort McMurray.

• At 10 a.m. authorities told her to leave. Immediately.

“I didn’t know what to take,” says Hruby, recalling her anxious departure, “You start

doing crazy things.”

Page 5: Crowsnest Fire final version

Crowsnest Firesan eye witness account

• Hruby– Collected:

• Cat, dog, mining lamp, her jewelry (but not his), and a little plastic Buddha.

– Mezmerized:• drove to lookout to watch fire• From her vantage point could watch the fire descend on

Hillcrest

Despite her horror, she couldn’t stop looking

Page 6: Crowsnest Fire final version

Crowsnest Firesan eye witness account

“I felt masochistic, sitting on the

outcropping,” Hruby recalls, “But those flames were like a

magnet.”

Figure 4 Forest fire4

Page 7: Crowsnest Fire final version

Crowsnest Firesthe fallout

• Crowsnest Fire blaze (2003)– burned over 20,000 hectares of forest– Affecting:

• Timber industry, local businesses, tourism (especially hard hit

– But• local dry cleaners, gas stations, restaurants and office

services maintained a steady business.

Page 8: Crowsnest Fire final version

Crowsnest Firesthe fallout

• Example: Spray Lake Sawmills • Benefits:

– able to use a significant amount of the burnt lumber.– With large salvage quota (28%) able to ensure burnt

lumber not wasted

• Difficulties:– Root scorch– cost of accessibility– Debarking dilemma

• burnt bark is not useable but de-barking the trees will keep the chips clean and reduce the carbon content.

Page 9: Crowsnest Fire final version

Crowsnest Firesthe fallout: Ecological Pros and Cons

Positive• Certainly a burned area is

black and looks devoid of life.

• A burned area creates ecological diversity and allows for the development of rich undergrowth that wasn’t there before.

Negative• Over time burned area

creates diversity that wasn’t there before

• Large stands of timber smother the light and inhibit undergrowth – even though large stands of trees are aesthetically pleasing and profitable for the lumber industry.

Page 10: Crowsnest Fire final version

Crowsnest firesGraphic sources

Figure #:1. Image obtained from: Jason Knight. (2003). Lost Creek Fire, Looking South:

July 2003, [Online Image]. Retrieved September 17, 2009, from: http://www.geog.ubc.ca/courses/geog376/students/class06/fire/lost_creek_fire_south.jpg/

2. Image obtained from: Jason Knight. (2003). Hillcrest Fire: August 2, 2003, [Online Image]. Retrieved September 17, 2009, from: http://www.geog.ubc.ca/courses/geog376/students/class06/fire/hillcrest.jpg

3. Image obtained from: Jason Knight. (2003). Ridge Forest Fire, [Online Image]. Retrieved September 17, 2009, from: http://www.geog.ubc.ca/courses/geog376/students/class06/fire/ridge_forest_fire.jpg

4. Image obtained from: Photographer unknown. (2007). Special 2 Me: Damage Control vs teaching, [Online Image]. Retrieved September 17, 2009, from: http://specialedandme.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/forest-fire.jpe?w=310&h=192