crossrail line 1 assessment of lighting impacts:...
TRANSCRIPT
Crossrail Line 1Assessment of Lighting Impacts: Technical Report
Crossrail Line 1 Assessment of Lighting Impacts Technical Report Volume 2 of 2 1E0324-G0E00-00001
O
O
C
O
O
O
B
L
L
L
3
O
O
C
O
O
O
O
O
O
C
O
B
L
L
L
5
O
O
O
O
C
O
B
L
4
O
B
L
L
M
2
O
O
O
O
C
O
B
L
L
H
1
Receptors Location
Other
B - Baseline C - Construction O - Operation Site Activity
Criteria + Magnitude
Workplace
ResidentialC - CriticalH - High M - ModerateL - Low
Receptor Group + Sensitivity
Other
Built Environment
Ecological
Dark Area
Astronomers
Pedestrian
Vehicular
Dim
Neutral
Security
Exterior Amenity
Exterior Vehicular/Pedestrian
Exterior Emergency
Exterior Workplace
BrightPerceived Brightness+ Impact
Interior WorkplaceN - Normal Working E - Extended Daytime A - Dusk Till 12.30am O - Dusk Till DawnI - Infrequent/TestingU - Unlit
Illumination Function+ Operational Hours
Site DescriptionCanal Way Junction is located on the south side of the Grand Union Canal in the vicinity of Kensal Green Cemetery.Kensal Green Gasworks is immediately adjacent to the northside of the site.Key Receptors:1. Residents to the south of the rail corridor.
i.e. Sunbeam Crescent.2. Industrial/Commercial Properties on Canal Way.3. Bus Terminus on Canal Way.4. Kensal Green Cemetery.
Lighting SchemeNo artificial lighting was visible within the railway, during thedaytime scoping survey on 07.10.04. Canal Way itself isilluminated by partial cut-off high pressure sodium lanternsMounted on approximately 8-10 metre high columns.
W2Route WindowCanal Way JunctionSite
E3Environmental ZoneCanal WayLocation
Baseline Scoping
Design Proposals and Scoping Assessment Pro-formaSite Location
N/AN/AEngineering Information provided by Crossrail
N/A
Revision
N/A
Date
Relevant Parliamentary Plan Sheets
Reference Documents
Proposals Assessment
CR - Rain M - Mist O - Overcast C - ClearClimatic Conditions
W2-1 to W2-33 InclusivePhotographic Record
07.10.04DateKeith Miller and Efren CartasPersonnel
Assessment
Site DescriptionTrackworks required as the continuation of the Ladbroke Grove work.
Lighting SchemeNo details of any additional temporary lighting provision within the rail corridor available at the time of the daytime scoping survey 07.10.2004.
Construction Design Proposals: Scheme description + Site Diagram
Site DescriptionArea will revert to baseline, but with 4 tracks instead of 6.
Lighting SchemeNo information available.
Baseline Installation Proposals: Scheme description + Site Diagram
Operation Design Proposals: Scheme description + Site Diagram
2
2
Canal Way
11111
2 23
44
5
11111
2 23
44
5
2
11111
2 23
44
5
Site Boundary
Crossrail Line 1Assessment of Lighting Impacts: Technical Report
Crossrail Line 1 Assessment of Lighting Impacts Technical Report Volume 2 of 2 1E0324-G0E00-00001
Scoping and Proposals Analysis Pro-forma Site Location
L
L
L
3
L
L
L
5
L
4
L
L
M
2
L
L
H
1
Receptors LocationCriteria + Magnitude
Workplace
ResidentialC - CriticalH - High M - ModerateL - Low
Receptor Group + Sensitivity
Other
Built Environment
Ecological
Dark Landscape
Astronomers
Pedestrian
Vehicular
OCOCOCOCOCSite Activity Compared to Baseline C - Construction O - Operation
Construction Mitigation
IAIAIAIAIAIdentify Significance ( I ) of Impact or Proceed with Analysis ( A )
P+ PARTICULARLY SIGNIFICANT POSITIVES+ SIGNIFICANT POSITIVENS NOT SIGNIFICANTS- SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVEP- PARTICULARLY SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVE
Residual Impact
Secondary Mitigation
Primary Mitigation
CCCCCCCCCCConclude Assessment ( C ) orIdentify Mitigation ( M )
Action
Identify Significance ( I ) of Impact orProceed with Analysis ( A )
Action
NSNSNSNSNSNSNSNSNSNSP+ PARTICULARLY SIGNIFICANT POSITIVES+ SIGNIFICANT POSITIVENS NOT SIGNIFICANTS- SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVEP- PARTICULARLY SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVE
Significance of ImpactReceptor Sensitivity
MMMMMN - NEGLIGIBLEM - MODERATE ADVERSES - SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE
Potential ImpactDuration of Change
Action
N M N NMNMMNM
Conclude Assessment ( C ) orInstigate Detailed Assessment ( D)
Result
B - BENEFICIALN - NEGLIGIBLEM - MODERATE ADVERSES - SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE
Magnitude of ChangeBrightness Comparison
AnalysisW2Route WindowCanal Way JunctionSite
E3Environmental ZoneCanal WayLocation
Crossrail Line 1Assessment of Lighting Impacts: Technical Report
Crossrail Line 1 Assessment of Lighting Impacts Technical Report Volume 2 of 2 1E0324-G0E00-00001
W2Route WindowCanal Way JunctionSite
E3Environmental ZoneCanal WayLocation
Design Proposals and Scoping Assessment Pro-formaSite Location
W2-1 W2-2 W2-3 W2-4 W2-5
W2-11 W2-12 W2-13 W2-14 W2-15
W2-6 W2-7 W2-8 W2-9 W2-10
Crossrail Line 1Assessment of Lighting Impacts: Technical Report
Crossrail Line 1 Assessment of Lighting Impacts Technical Report Volume 2 of 2 1E0324-G0E00-00001
W2Route WindowCanal Way JunctionSite
E3Environmental ZoneCanal WayLocation
Design Proposals and Scoping Assessment Pro-formaSite Location
W2-26 W2-27 W2-28 W2-29 W2-30
W2-21
W2-16 W2-17 W2-18 W2-19 W2-20
W2-22 W2-23 W2-24 W2-25
Crossrail Line 1Assessment of Lighting Impacts: Technical Report
Crossrail Line 1 Assessment of Lighting Impacts Technical Report Volume 2 of 2 1E0324-G0E00-00001
W2Route WindowCanal Way JunctionSite
E3Environmental ZoneCanal WayLocation
Design Proposals and Scoping Assessment Pro-formaSite Location
W2-31 W2-32 W2-33