crohn's disease pharmascape cv
Embed Size (px)
TRANSCRIPT

C h ‘ diCrohn‘s diseasePharmascapepAll information herein is publically availableThis document is meant only to illustrate Oliver Vit’s professional competencesand does not reflect Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd’s corporate views

Marketed biologics for Crohn‘s disease
Remicade®, infliximab
Humira®, adalimumabHumira®, adalimumab
Tysabri®, natalizumab
C ®Cimzia®, certolizumab
2 Life Cycle ManagementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Remicade® • Chimeric IgG1κ monoclonal antibody targeting TNF-α• Induction via intravenous infusion of 5mg/kg at week-0 & -2, followed by maintenance regimen of
5mg/kg every 6-weeks for responders at week-2• 1st registration trials based on 12- to 26-week endpoints, followed by label extensions in Crohn‘s
disease acheieved with maintenance therapy in 2 large Phase III trials demonstrating efficacy & steroidsparing effects at 1-year in both severe active & fistulating CD as required by REMs
• Results from 5mg/kg 2-week induction regimen followed by 5mg/kg every 8-weeks – ~60% responder rate to 1st administration (n=573)– 51% higher remission rate (CDAI <150 pts) at week-30 (39% Remicade@ vs 19% placebo)– median time to loss of response (↓ in CDAI score to ≥70 pts and ≥ 25% from baseline) was 27 weeks longer than
placebo (46 weeks Remicade@ vs 19 weeks placebo)56% hi h ti t i d i i th h k 54 (25% R i d @ 11% l b )– 56% higher proportion retained remission through week-54 (25% Remicade@ vs 11% placebo)
• Headache, abdominal pain, URTI & infusion site reactions most common reported AE• Black box warnings: malignancies specifically hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma in CD patients, serious
infections inclusive of Hepatitis B reactivation, hepatoxicity inclusive of death and liver transplant, cytopenias, hypersensitivity inclusive of anaphylaxis, demyelinating disorders, Lupus-like syndrome & myocardial infarction reported in rare casesmyocardial infarction reported in rare cases
• 6-13% of CD patients test positive for infliximab NABs which are associated with a higher incidence ofinjection site reactions
• Intermittent therapy is not encouraged due to perceived higher immunogenicity risk• Crohn‘s disease was the 1st licensed indication
3
• Annual cost €21,573/$21,166
Life Cycle ManagementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Remicade® – CD development plan1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 20071995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Phase IIISevere active CD
RA PsA UC
Phase III
ACCENT I
Fistulizing active CD
ACCENT I
ACCENT II
Severe active CD
Fistulizing active CD
SONICAzothioprine/Infliximabcombination
4Launch Fistulas
extensionMaintenance
extensionLife Cycle ManagementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® Humanized IgG monoclonal antibody targeting TNF α• Humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting TNF-α
• Induction via subcutaneous bolus dose of 80mg at week 0 followed by 40 or 80mg at week 2, followed by maintenance regimen of 40mg every other week with a pre-filled syringe orautoinjection pen in Crohn‘s Disease
• Fast acting agent with limited long term respondersg g g p• Results at week-26 maintained through week-56 with 80/40mg induction followed by 40mg EoW
– 44% higher remission rate (CDAI <150 pts) at week-56 (79% Humira®, 50% placebo)
– ~30% of patients achieve corticosteroid-free remission for ≥90 days– 127 days mean time to remission127 days mean time to remission– complete fistula closure achieved in ~30% of patients
• Injection site reaction/irritation most common reported AE• 2 cases of pulmonary tuberculosis and 1 case of MS reported in CHARM trial• Black box warnings: malignancies specifically lymphoma, serious infections inclusive ofac bo a gs a g a c es spec ca y y p o a, se ous ect o s c us e o
bacterial sepsis, TB reactivation, invasive fungal infections reported in rare cases• ≥ 150,000 patients in safety database across all indications as of 2007• 0.4-3.6% of patients test positive for adalimumab NABs• Fourth indication following RA, Psoriatic arthritis & Ankylosing spondylitis
5
g , y g p y• Annual cost €14,700/$20,339
Life Cycle ManagementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – CD development plan2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 200 2006 200 2008 2009 2010 2011 20122000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
CLASSIC-I
RA PsA AS Pso JIA
CHARM
CLASSIC-II
GAIN
CHOICEInfliximab failures
EXTENDMucosal healing
CAREQoL outcomes
PYRAMID
6US
Launch
PYRAMIDLong term safety
Life Cycle ManagementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri® • Monthly 300mg i.v. infusion of humanized monoclonal antibody against α-4 integrin, reducing
T cell traffic through the endothelium into tissueg• ENACT-1 trial failed to show significant induction effects at week-10, however ENCORE
demonstrated significant results at week-830% higher proportion of clinical response (↓CDAI score by 100 pts) at week-4(39% Tysabri® 300mg, 27% placebo)33% higher proportion of clinical response (↓CDAI score by 70 pts) sustained from week-8 to week-12(48% Tysabri® 300mg 32% placebo)(48% Tysabri® 300mg, 32% placebo)38% higher proportion of clinical remission (CDAI score < 150) sustained from week-8 to week-12(26% Tysabri® 300mg, 16% placebo)
• ENACT-2 demonstrated significant benefit upon long-term treatment54% higher rate of clinical response (↓CDAI score by 70 pts) sustained from week-10 to week-36(61% Tysabri® 300mg, 28% placebo)41% higher rate of clinical remission (CDAI score <150) sustained from week-10 to week-36(44% Tysabri® 300mg, 26% placebo)( % ysab ® 300 g, 6% p acebo)
• Injection site reaction/irritation most common reported AE• Rare malignancies & opportunistic infections cited with long-term exposure• Black box warnings: PML, hypersensitivity specifically anaphylaxis, immunosuppression and
hepatotoxicity reported in rare cases• As of 2010 one PML case reported in Crohn‘s Disease patients; in MS patients a total of 68
PML cases reported, inclusive of 14 deaths• ~10% of patients test positive for natalizumab NABs• Licensed exclusively in the US for Crohn‘s disease
$
7
• Annual cost estimated at $37,000 (based on MS figures)
Life Cycle ManagementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri® – CD development plan1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
CD202
CD306
MS Launch Re-launchPML
ENACT-1
ENACT-2
CD306On top of Remicade®
CD305
ENACT 2
ENACT-2 ext
ENCORE
CD305Paediactric
CD352Paediactric
CD INFORMPharmacovigilance long-term safety
8
USLaunch
Life Cycle ManagementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® • Polyethylene glycolated Fab‘ fragment of humanized anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody delivered by
monthly 400mg subcutaneous injectionmonthly 400mg subcutaneous injection• Phase IIb trial failed to demonstrate a benefit at week-12 in the ITT with 400mg against placebo; post-
hoc analysis suggests a correlation between CRP levels >10mg/L and efficacy• PRECISE 1 & PRECISE 2 trials stratify by CRP levels yet fail to establish a correlation between CRP
levels and efficacy, however reach statistical significance at week-6 and week-26
30% higher proportion of patients with baseline serum CRP levels of at least 10mg/L achievinga reduction of ≥ 100 points in the CDAI score at week-6 (37% Cimzia® 400mg, 26% placebo)
45% higher proportion of patients with baseline serum CRP levels of at least 10mg/L achievinga reduction of ≥ 100 points in the CDAI score at week-26 (62% Cimzia® 400mg, 34% placebo)
• Statistical responses begin at week-2• No explanation accounts for the differences between the increased proportion of patients achieving a
reduction in CDAI scores of ≥ 100 points or remission (CDAI total score <150) in PRECISE 2 (64%/43%) as opposed to PRECISE 1 (35%/22%)
• Maintenance of remission was only achieved in PRECISE 2• Maintenance of remission was only achieved in PRECISE 2• Black box warnings: malignancies specifically lymphoma, serious infections inclusive of bacterial
sepsis, TB reactivation, invasive fungal infections reported in rare cases• ~8% of patients test positive for certolizumab NABs• Licensed for use in Crohn‘s disease exclusively in the US; rejected by EMEA in 2007
9
• Annual costs $18,408
Life Cycle ManagementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® – CD development plan1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
CDP870
PRECISE 1
RA
MUSICMucosal healing
PRECISE 2
PRECISE 3Long-term OL for P1/P2
PRECISE 4Long-term OL for P1/P2 withdrawals due to CD exacerbation
C87042Remicade® failures
COSPAR1Corticosteroid sparing - TERMINATED
SECUREPharmacovigilance long-term safety
C87085Induction study
10US
LaunchUS
NDALife Cycle ManagementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Comparative induction capacity at week-4
Active Placebo Difference
Clinical Response (↓CDAI ≥70)
Remicade®, (5mg) 81% 17% 65%
Remicade®, (5, 10, 20mg) 65% 17% 48%
Humira®, (80/40mg induction) 58% 36% 22%Humira®, (80/40mg induction) 58% 36% 22%
Humira®, (40mg maintenance) 52% 34% 18%
Tysabri®, (300mg, ↑ CRP ENCORE) 51% 37% 15%
Cimzia®, (↑ CRP sub-group analysis) 50% 31% 19%
Cimzia®, (400mg, all patients) 44% 31% 10%
p-values 0.011 - 0.001p values 0.011 0.001
Life Cycle ManagementCompetitive intelligence analysis
11

Comparative induction capacity at week-4
Active Placebo Difference
Clinical Remission (CDAI ≤150)
Remicade®, (5mg) 48% 4% 44%
Remicade®, (5, 10, 20mg) 36% 4% 28%
Humira®, (80/40mg induction) 33% 12% 24%Humira®, (80/40mg induction) 33% 12% 24%
Humira®, (40mg maintenance) 21% 7% 14%
Tysabri®, (300mg, ↑ CRP ENCORE) 24% 16% 8%
Cimzia®, (↑ CRP sub-group analysis) 20% 10% 10%
Cimzia®, (400mg, all patients) 19% 11% 8%
p-values 0.018 - 0.001p values 0.018 0.001
Life Cycle ManagementCompetitive intelligence analysis
12

Crohn‘s disease competitors in development
Vedolizumab, MLN0002
Traficet-EN, CCX282-B
CEP-37248
AIN457
Stelara*
Laquinimod
CCX025
CP 690.550
CEP-37247, ART-621
ELND004
Briakinumab, ABT-874**
13
* Rumor: Phase II results positive and support Phase III** Rumor: Clinical development stopped in CD due to negative Phase II results
Life Cycle ManagementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Crohn‘s disease: clinical development environment
CCR9 antagonistα-4-integrin
CCX025antagonist
ELND004CEP-37247
LaunchedPhase II Phase IIIPhase I
CP 690.550
JAK3 antagonistTraficet-ENVedolizumab
LaunchedPhase II Phase IIIPhase I
Laquinimod
Anti-proliferant/replicativeAIN457Stelara
Briakinumab
Anti-IL-17 CEP-37248oral
Anti-IL-12/IL-23
parenteral
14 Life Cycle ManagementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Conclusions
• Remicade® dramatically changed the Crohn‘s disease treatment paradigm; diffcult differentiationbetween Remicade®, Humira®, Tysabri®, and Cimzia® outside of route of administration & rare safetysignals as witnessed by comparable prescription rates
• Response rates are only 30-60% in treatment naϊve patients; discontinuation in the case of inadequateinitial response is recommended in posology label textinitial response is recommended in posology label text
• Although efficacy did not wane during the conduct of the published clinical trials, the presence of NAB titers is associated with a significant loss in efficacy upon extended administration, eg >1yr
• Loss of efficacy & low differentiation drives high switch market between TNF-α agentsConfidential• All registration trials assessed efficacy by ∆CDAI scores, however the index is intrinsically prone tosubjective variability
• Placebo effect appears to be more pronounced over time (up to 47% in Cimzia® trials; average of 19% across 21 randomized CD trials)
Confidential• Alternative efficacy measures available Crohn‘s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS)• Stellara® & briakinumab both demonstrated fast acting potential in other clinical trials, eg psoriasis• Biosimilars to Remicade® & Tysabri® may be available at the time of launch• Effective competitive oral therapy on the horizonEffective competitive oral therapy on the horizon
15 Life Cycle ManagementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Back ups

Crohn‘s Disease Activity Index (CDAI)
Cli i l l b t i bl W i hti f t
Remission of Crohn's disease is defined as a CDAI <150
M d di i d fi d b l f 220 4 0Clinical or laboratory variable Weighting factor
Number of liquid or soft stools each day for seven days x 2
Abdominal pain (graded from 0-3 on severity) x 5
Moderate disease is defined by a value of 220-450
Severre disease is defined as >450
Clinical response is typically defined as a reduction >70
p (g y)each day for seven days x 5
General well being, subjectively assessed from 0 (well) to 4 (terrible) each day for seven days x 7
Presence of complications* x 20
Taking Lomitil or opiates for diarrhea x 30
Presence of an abdominal mass (0 as none, 2 as questionable 5 as definite) x 10
*One point each is added for each set of complications:•the presence of joint pain (arthralgia) or frank arthritis •inflammation of the iris or uveitis•presence of erythema nodosum, pyoderma gangrenosum or aphthous ulcers •Anal fissures fistulae or abscessesquestionable, 5 as definite)
Absolute deviation of Hematocrit from 47% in men and 42% in women x 6
Percentage deviation from standard weight x 1
Anal fissures, fistulae or abscesses•Other fistulae •Fever during the previous week
17 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Loss of response to Remicade®
18 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Loss of response to Remicade®
19 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Loss of response to Remicade®
20 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Loss of response to Humira®
21 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Remicade®
22 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Remicade® – US label; indication
23 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Remicade® – US label; warnings
24 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Remicade® – EU label; indication
25 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

®Remicade® – EU label; warnings
26 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

®Remicade® – EU label; warnings
27 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Remicade® – EU label; warnings
28 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Remicade® – Clinical trials overview• Phase III Induction trial in severe active CD
– 4 week treatment in treatment failures– 5mg/kg, 10mg/kg, 20mg/kg or placebo on top of unsatisfactory background therapy – CDAI endpoints– 108 patients
• Phase III Induction trial in fistulizing active CD (NCT00207662)– 26 week treatment– 5mg/kg, 10mg/kg or placebo– CDAI endpoints– 94 patients
• ACCENT I Phase III Maintenance trial in severe active CD (NCT00207662)– 54 week treatment– 5mg/kg induction followed by 5mg/kg week-2 & 6 followed by 5mg/kg or 10mg/kg every 8-weeks, or placebo– CDAI endpointsp– 573 patients– 11 months recruitment– 6 countries, 55 sites (North America, Europe, IL)
• ACCENT II Phase III Maintenance trial in fistulizing active CD (NCT00207766)– 54 week treatment– 5mg/kg induction followed by 5mg/kg week-2 & 6 followed by 5mg/kg or 10mg/kg every 8-weeks, or placebo– CDAI endpoints
306 patients– 306 patients– 10 months recruitment– 6 countries, 45 sites (BE, CA, CZ, PL, NL, US)
• SONIC Phase III Combination trial with azathiaprine (NCT00094458)– 1 yr trial; 34 week Treatment Period I, 20 week Treatment Period II– 5mg/kg induction followed by 5mg/kg week-2 & 6 followed by 5mg/kg or 10mg/kg every 8-weeks, 2.5mg/kg OD azathioprine or both– CDAI endpoints, mucosal healing, steroid free, clinical response & remission– 508 patients
29 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
– 3 years 9 months recruitment

Remicade® – Phase III active CD; design 1998 FDA label
12-week alternative dosing regimens of Remicade® vs placebo on top ofconventional therapies in patients who failed to achieve adequate response(n=108)
Phase I Phase II Phase III
Remicade® 5mg/kg10mg/kg
Week 0 2 4 8 12 20 28 36 48
Phase I Phase II Phase III
20mg/kgPlacebo
10mg/kg*g g
CDAI assessment
30 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
* Infliximab treatment failures at the 1° endpointreceived a 2nd infusion of 10mg/kg @ week-4

Remicade® – Phase III active CD; results 1998 FDA label
31 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Remicade® – Phase III fistulizing CD; design 1998 FDA label
22-week alternative dosing regimens of Remicade® vs placebo on top of conventional therapies in patients with inadequate response and fistulas ≥ 3-months(n=94)
Remicade® 5mg/kg10mg/kg
Week 0 2 6 10 14 18 22
x x x
x x x
Placebox x x
Fistula assessment
X = administration
32 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Remicade® – Phase III fistulating CD; results 1998 FDA label
33 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Remicade® – Phase III ACCENT I; design 2002 Maintenance infliximab for Crohn‘s disease; the ACCENT I randomised trial
54-week alternative dosing regimens of Remicade® vs placeboin responders to first 2-week induction therapy(n=573)
Open label Double blind
Remicade® 5mg/kg10mg/kg
Week-2 0 2 6 10 14 22 30 38 46 54
Open label Double blind
Placebo
Rescue Tx 5/10/15mg/kgCDAI assessment
IBDQ
Response assessed as CDAI score reduction at week-2
34 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
Response assessed as CDAI score reduction at week-2 from baseline of either:
↓70 points25% total score reduction

Remicade® – Phase III ACCENT I; intent to treat2002 Maintenance infliximab for Crohn‘s disease; the ACCENT I randomised trial;
35 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Remicade® – Phase III ACCENT I; patient characteristics2002 Maintenance infliximab for Crohn‘s disease; the ACCENT I randomised trial;
36 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Remicade® – Phase III ACCENT I; endpoints & results 2002 Maintenance infliximab for Crohn‘s disease; the ACCENT I randomised trial
• Primary endpoints proportion of patients which responded at @ week-2 and in remission
(CDAI<150 points) @ week 30
;
(CDAI<150 points) @ week-30 time to loss of response up to week-54 in responders
• Secondary endpoints ∆ median IBDQ total score from baseline ∆ median CDAI total score from baseline ∆ median CDAI total score from baseline ∆ median CRP levels from baseline
Trial was powered assuming a 60% responder rate to induction to detect a significant difference between dose groups in terms of remission rate at week-30 (95%) and time to loss of response up to week-54 (90%)
37 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
met x not met ~trend

Remicade® – Phase III ACCENT I; endpoints & results 2002 Maintenance infliximab for Crohn‘s disease; the ACCENT I randomised trial;
38 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Remicade® – Phase III ACCENT I; endpoints & results 2002 Maintenance infliximab for Crohn‘s disease; the ACCENT I randomised trial;
39 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Remicade® – Phase III ACCENT I; safety & tolerability 2002 Maintenance infliximab for Crohn‘s disease; the ACCENT I randomised trial
40 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Remicade® – Phase III ACCENT II; design
54-week maintenance Remicade® 5mg/kg vs placebo in responders to first
2004 Infliximab Maintenance Therapy for Fistulizing Crohn‘s disease
6-week induction therapy with fistulas ≥ 3-months(n=306)
Week2 0 2 6 10 14 22 30 38 46 54
Open label Double blind
Remicade® 10mg/kgRemicade® 5mg/kgPlacebo
-2 0 2 6 10 14 22 30 38 46 54
X X
X
PlaceboFistula
assessmentX = re-randomisationX = up-titration possibility
CDAI
IBDQ
41 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
Response assessed as 50% reduction from baseline in total number of fistulas at consecutive visits ≥ 4 weeks apart at week-14 visit

Remicade® – Phase III ACCENT II; intent to treat2004 Infliximab Maintenance Therapy for Fistulizing Crohn‘s disease
42 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Remicade® – Phase III ACCENT II; patient characteristics2004 Infliximab Maintenance Therapy for Fistulizing Crohn‘s disease
43 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Remicade® – Phase III ACCENT II; endpoints & results
• Primary endpoints
2004 Infliximab Maintenance Therapy for Fistulizing Crohn‘s disease
• Primary endpoints 36 weeks longer time to loss of response up to week-54 in responders
(40 weeks on Remicade®, 14 weeks on placebo)• Secondary endpoints
50% higher proportion of responders maintained clinical response @ week-54g @(46% on Remicade®, 23% on placebo)
47% higher number of patients with full response at week-54 (36% on Remicade®, 19% on placebo)
84% higher response rate in patients with CDAI scores ≥220 at baseline(36% on Remicade® 6% on placebo)(36% on Remicade®, 6% on placebo)
median decrease of 26 and 25 points in baseline CDAI scores at week-30 and -54(↓42 & ↓40 on Remicade®, ↓16 & ↓15 on placebo)
median increase of 10 and 5 in baseline IBDQ scores at week-30 and -54(↑14 & ↑10 on Remicade®, ↑4 & ↑5 on placebo)
• Crossover treatment results• Following loss initial response in the placebo maintenance regime, re-administration of
5mg/kg re-established clinical response in 61% of patients• Following loss initial response in the 5mg/kg maintenance regime, up-titration to
10mg/kg re-established clinical response in 61% of patients
44 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
g g p % p
met x not met ~trend

Remicade® – Phase III ACCENT II; endpoints & results 2004 Infliximab Maintenance Therapy for Fistulizing Crohn‘s disease
45 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Remicade® – Phase III ACCENT II; safety & tolerability 2004 Infliximab Maintenance Therapy for Fistulizing Crohn‘s disease
46 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Remicade® – Phase III ACCENT II; safety & tolerability 2004 Infliximab Maintenance Therapy for Fistulizing Crohn‘s disease
47 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira®
48 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – US label; indication
49 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – US label; warnings
50 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – EU label; indication

Humira® – EU label; indication

Humira® – EU label; warnings

Humira® – EU label; warnings

Humira® – EU label; warnings

Humira® – EU label; warnings

Humira® – EU label; warnings

Humira® – Clinical trials overview• CLASSIC-I Phase IIb Induction
– 4 week treatment– 160/80mg, 80/40mg, 40/20mg or placebo (1:1:1:1)– CDAI endpoints– 299 patients– 16 months recruitment– 6 countries, 55 sites (BE, CA, CZ, PL, NL, US)
• CLASSIC-II Phase IIb Maintenance– 56 week treatment– 40mg EoW 40mg weekly or placebo– 40mg EoW, 40mg weekly or placebo– CDAI endpoints– 276 patients– 12 months recruitment– 6 countries, 53 sites (BE, CA, CZ, PL, NL, US)
• CHARM Phase III (NCT00077779)– 56 week treatment– 80/40mg on week 0/2 followed by 40mg EoW, 40mg weekly or placebo
CDAI d i t– CDAI endpoints– 778 patients– 14 months recruitment– 8 countries, 92 sites (AU, CA, LT, PL, RO, TR, US, ZA)
• GAIN Phase III (NCT00105300)– 4-week treatment– 160mg/80mg or placebo – CDAI endpointsp– 325 patients– 12 months recruitment– 4 countries, 52 sites (BE, CA, FR, US)
• EXTEND Phase III (NCT00348283)– 1 yr treatment; 12-week Treatment Period I, Week-13 to Week-52 Treatment Period II– 160mg/80mg/40mg or placebo in Treatment Period I, OL Treatment Period II– Mucosal healing 1° endpoint
135 patients
58 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
– 135 patients– 2 years recruitment– 8 countries, 21 sites (AT, BE, CA, DE, FR, IT, NL, US)

Humira® – Clinical trials overview• CHOICE Phase IIIb (NCT00338650)
– 4 week treatment– 40mg weekly OL– Safety & QoL endpoints– 1000 patients– 1 countries, 97 sites (US)
• CARE Phase IIIb (NCT00409617)– 20 week treatment– 40mg EoW, 40mg weekly or placebo– Clinical remission CDAI endpoints– Clinical remission, CDAI endpoints– 945 patients– 12 months recruitment– 18 countries, 219 sites (AT, BE, CH, CZ, DE, DK, ES, FI, FR, GR, IR, IT, NO, PT, SE, SK, UK, US)
• PYRAMID Phase IV (NCT00524537)– Long term safety registry study– 5000 patients– 24 countries, 416 sites (AT, AU, BE, CA, CZ, DE, DK, ES, FR, GR, HU, IS, IR, IT, NL, NO, NZ, PT, SE, SK, SL, UK, US, ZA)
59 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase IIb CLASSIC-I; design 2006 Human Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Monoclonal Antibody (Adalimumab) in CD: the CLASSIC-I Trial
4-week alternative dosing regimens of Humira® vs placeboAnti-TNF-α treament naϊve patients(n=299)
y ( )
Humira® 160/80 mg80/40 mg
Week Week Week Week Week -2 0 1 2 4
40/20 mgPlacebo
CDAI assessment
administration
IBDQ
60 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase IIb CLASSIC-I; intent to treat2006 Human Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Monoclonal Antibody (Adalimumab) in CD: the CLASSIC-I Trialy ( )
61 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase IIb CLASSIC-I; patient characteristics2006 Human Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Monoclonal Antibody (Adalimumab) in CD: the CLASSIC-I Trialy ( )
62 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase IIb CLASSIC-I; endpoints & results 2006 Human Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Monoclonal Antibody (Adalimumab) in CD: the CLASSIC-I Trialy ( )
• Primary endpoints Induction of remission as measured by CDAI score <150 @ week 4
(36% Humira® 160/80mg 24% Humira® 80/40mg 12% placebo)(36% Humira® 160/80mg, 24% Humira® 80/40mg, 12% placebo)• Secondary endpoints
proportion of patients meeting 70-point reduction @ week 4(59% Humira® 160/80mg, 59% Humira® 80/40mg, 37% placebo)
proportion of patients meeting 100-point reduction @ week 4p p p g p @(50% Humira® 160/80mg*, 40% Humira® 80/40mg, 25% placebo
*statistical significance acheived only with 160/80mg dose group
∆ IBDQ total score from baseline(158 Humira® 160/80mg & 80/40mg, 146 placebo)
Trial was powered (80%) to detect differences between the 80/40mg and 160/80mg dose groups
63 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
met x not met ~trend

Humira® – Phase IIb CLASSIC-I; endpoints & results 2006 Human Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Monoclonal Antibody (Adalimumab) in CD: the CLASSIC-I Trialy ( )
64 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase IIb CLASSIC-I; endpoints & results 2006 Human Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Monoclonal Antibody (Adalimumab) in CD: the CLASSIC-I Trialy ( )
65 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase IIb CLASSIC-I; endpoints & results 2006 Human Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Monoclonal Antibody (Adalimumab) in CD: the CLASSIC-I Trialy ( )

Humira® – Phase IIb CLASSIC-I; safety & tolerability 2006 Human Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Monoclonal Antibody (Adalimumab) in CD: the CLASSIC-I Trialy ( )
67 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase IIb CLASSIC-I; safety & tolerability 2006 Human Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Monoclonal Antibody (Adalimumab) in CD: the CLASSIC-I Trialy ( )
68 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase IIb CLASSIC-II; design 2006 Adalimumab for maintenance treatment of CD: results of the CLASSIC-II Trial
56-week alternative dosing regimens of Humira® vs placeboin patients which acheived remission in CLASSIC-I(n=276)
Humira® 40mg EoW40mg weekly
Week 0 2 4 8 12 16 20 24 32 40 48 56
Placebo
Rescue therapy40mg weekly40mg weekly
CDAI assessment
IBDQ
69 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase IIb CLASSIC-II; intent to treat2006 Adalimumab for maintenance treatment of CD: results of the CLASSIC-II Trial
Majority of CLASSIC-I patientsdid not maintain remission and were therefore ineligible for randomization
70 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase IIb CLASSIC-II; patient characteristics2006 Adalimumab for maintenance treatment of CD: results of the CLASSIC-II Trial
71 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

® C SS C &Humira® – Phase IIb CLASSIC-II; endpoints & results • Primary endpoints
44% higher proportion of patients in remission (CDAI score <150) @ week-56
2006 Adalimumab for maintenance treatment of CD: results of the CLASSIC-II Trial
g p p p ( ) @(79% Humira® 40mg EoW, 83% Humira® 40mg weekly, 44% placebo)
• Secondary endpoints 40% higher proportion of patients in remission @ week-24
(84% Humira® 40mg EoW, 94% Humira® 40mg weekly, 50% placebo) 12%/9% higher proportion of patients meeting 70 point reduction @ weeks 24 & 56 12%/9% higher proportion of patients meeting 70-point reduction @ weeks-24 & -56
(94%/79% Humira® 40mg EoW, 95%/89% Humira® 40mg weekly, 83%/72% placebo) 27%/29% higher proportion of patients meeting 100-point reduction @ weeks-24 & -56
(84%/79% Humira® 40mg EoW, 94%/89% Humira® 40mg weekly, 61%/56% placebo) 16/9 point higher IBDQ total score from baseline @ weeks-24 & -56
(178/176 H i ® 40 E W 186/192 H i ® 40 kl 162/167 l b )(178/176 Humira® 40mg EoW, 186/192 Humira® 40mg weekly, 162/167 placebo) proportion of patients which discontinued steroids without loss of remission @ weeks-24 & -56
• Open label arm • 46% (93/204) of patients acheived remission• 46% (93/204) of patients acheived remission• 72% (1477204) of patients acheived 70-point reduction• 65% (132/204) of patients acheived 100-point reduction• reduction of mean CDAI score of 158.4 points• 58% (21/36) of patients discontinued steroidal treatment from baseline
72 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
( ) pAs an extension of the CLASSIC-I trial, CLASSIC-II was not poweredAll analyses are exploratory, reductions are simply numeric and sample sizes from the RCT are small

Humira® – Phase IIb CLASSIC-II; endpoints & results 2006 Adalimumab for maintenance treatment of CD: results of the CLASSIC-II Trial
73 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase IIb CLASSIC-II; endpoints & results 2006 Adalimumab for maintenance treatment of CD: results of the CLASSIC-II Trial
74 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase IIb CLASSIC-II; safety & tolerability 2006 Adalimumab for maintenance treatment of CD: results of the CLASSIC-II Trial
75 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase III CHARM; design 2007 Adalimumab for Maintenance of Clinical Response and Remission in Patients with CD: The CHARM Trial
56-week alternative dosing regimens of Humira® vs placebofollowing induction with 80mg at week 0 and 40 mg at week 2(n=778)
2007 Adalimumab for Maintenance of Clinical Response and Remission in Patients with CD: The CHARM Trial
Humira® 40mg EoW40mg weekly
Week -2 0 2 4 6 8 12 16 20 26 32 40 48 56 60
Open label Double blind
40mg weeklyPlacebo
Rescue therapypy40mg EoW
CDAI
IBDQ
76 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase III CHARM; intent to treat2007 Adalimumab for Maintenance of Clinical Response and Remission in Patients with CD: The CHARM Trial2007 Adalimumab for Maintenance of Clinical Response and Remission in Patients with CD: The CHARM Trial
~ 30-40% do not respondat week-4
~ 50% of respondersdiscontinue
~ 75% of non-respondersdiscontinue
77 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase III CHARM; patient characteristics2007 Adalimumab for Maintenance of Clinical Response and Remission in Patients with CD: The CHARM Trial2007 Adalimumab for Maintenance of Clinical Response and Remission in Patients with CD: The CHARM Trial
78 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase III CHARM; endpoints & results 2007 Ad li b f M i t f Cli i l R d R i i i P ti t ith CD Th CHARM T i l
• Primary endpoints 58% higher proportion of patients in remission (CDAI score <150) @ week-26
(40% Humira® 40mg EoW, 47% Humira® 40mg weekly, 17% placebo) 67% higher proportion of patients in remission (CDAI score <150) @ week 56
2007 Adalimumab for Maintenance of Clinical Response and Remission in Patients with CD: The CHARM Trial
67% higher proportion of patients in remission (CDAI score <150) @ week-56(36% Humira® 40mg EoW, 41% Humira® 40mg weekly, 12% placebo)
• Secondary endpoints 41% higher proportion of patients in remission @ week-26
(81% Humira® 40mg EoW, 81% Humira® 40mg weekly, 48% placebo) 48%/58% higher proportion of patients meeting 70-point reduction @ weeks-26/-56
(54/43% Humira® 40mg EoW, 56/49% Humira® 40mg weekly, 28/18% placebo) 49%/61% higher proportion of patients meeting 100-point reduction @ weeks-26/-56
(89/71% Humira® 40mg EoW, 82/75% Humira® 40mg weekly, 45/28% placebo) ∆ IBDQ total score from baseline @ weeks-26/-56∆ IBDQ total score from baseline @ weeks 26/ 56 proportion of patients which discontinued steroids without loss of remission @ weeks-26/-56 proportion of patients with fistula remissiono effects of previous/concomitant use of immunosuppressant or TNF-α antagonist Txo 251 days ↑ median time to remission in responders
(378 d H i ® 40 E W 127 d l b )
79 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
(378 days Humira® 40mg EoW, 127 days placebo)met x not met ~trend

Humira® – Phase III CHARM; endpoints & results 2007 Adalimumab for Maintenance of Clinical Response and Remission in Patients with CD: The CHARM Trial2007 Adalimumab for Maintenance of Clinical Response and Remission in Patients with CD: The CHARM Trial
80 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase III CHARM; endpoints & results 2007 Adalimumab for Maintenance of Clinical Response and Remission in Patients with CD: The CHARM Trial2007 Adalimumab for Maintenance of Clinical Response and Remission in Patients with CD: The CHARM Trial
81 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase III CHARM; endpoints & results 2007 Adalimumab for Maintenance of Clinical Response and Remission in Patients with CD: The CHARM Trial2007 Adalimumab for Maintenance of Clinical Response and Remission in Patients with CD: The CHARM Trial
82 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase III CHARM; endpoints & results 2007 Adalimumab for Maintenance of Clinical Response and Remission in Patients with CD: The CHARM Trial2007 Adalimumab for Maintenance of Clinical Response and Remission in Patients with CD: The CHARM Trial
83 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase III CHARM; safety & tolerability 2007 Adalimumab for Maintenance of Clinical Response and Remission in Patients with CD: The CHARM Trial2007 Adalimumab for Maintenance of Clinical Response and Remission in Patients with CD: The CHARM Trial
84 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase III CHARM; intent to treatpost-hoc analysis
2008 Comparison of Two Adalimumab Treatment Schedule Strategies for Moderate-to-Severe CD: Results From the CHARM Trial2008 Comparison of Two Adalimumab Treatment Schedule Strategies for Moderate to Severe CD: Results From the CHARM Trial
85 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase III CHARM; patient characteristicspost-hoc analysis
2008 Comparison of Two Adalimumab Treatment Schedule Strategies for Moderate-to-Severe CD: Results From the CHARM Trial2008 Comparison of Two Adalimumab Treatment Schedule Strategies for Moderate to Severe CD: Results From the CHARM Trial
86 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase III CHARM; endpoints & resultpost-hoc analysis
2008 Comparison of Two Adalimumab Treatment Schedule Strategies for Moderate-to-Severe CD: Results From the CHARM Trial
• Primary endpoints 25% higher proportion of patients in remission (CDAI score <150) @ week-56
(51% Humira® 40mg EoW, 49% Humira® 40mg weekly, 38% placebo)• Secondary endpoints• Secondary endpoints
proportion of patients in remission @ week-24(51% Humira® 40mg EoW, 49% Humira® 40mg weekly, 38% placebo)
proportion of patients meeting 70-point reduction @ weeks-24/-56 proportion of patients meeting 100-point reduction @ weeks -24/-56 ∆ IBDQ total score from baseline @ weeks -24/-56 proportion of patients which discontinued steroids without loss of remission @
weeks -24/-56
• Open label arm• Open label arm • 46% (93/204) of patients acheived remission• 72% (1477204) of patients acheived 70-point reduction• 65% (132/204) of patients acheived 100-point reduction• reduction of mean CDAI score of 158.4 points
87 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
p• 58% (21/36) of patients discontinued steroidal treatment from baseline

Humira® – Phase III CHARM; endpoints & resultspost-hoc analysis
2008 Comparison of Two Adalimumab Treatment Schedule Strategies for Moderate-to-Severe CD: Results From the CHARM Trial2008 Comparison of Two Adalimumab Treatment Schedule Strategies for Moderate to Severe CD: Results From the CHARM Trial
88 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase III CHARM; endpoints & resultspost-hoc analysis
2008 Comparison of Two Adalimumab Treatment Schedule Strategies for Moderate-to-Severe CD: Results From the CHARM Trial2008 Comparison of Two Adalimumab Treatment Schedule Strategies for Moderate to Severe CD: Results From the CHARM Trial
89 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase III CHARM; safety & tolerabilitypost-hoc analysis
2008 Comparison of Two Adalimumab Treatment Schedule Strategies for Moderate-to-Severe CD: Results From the CHARM Trial2008 Comparison of Two Adalimumab Treatment Schedule Strategies for Moderate to Severe CD: Results From the CHARM Trial
90 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase III GAIN; design 2007 Adalimumab Induction Therapy for CD Previously Treated with Infliximab
4-week Humira® vs placebo in Remicade® treatment failures following induction with 160mg at week-0 and 80 mg at week-2(n=387)
2007 Adalimumab Induction Therapy for CD Previously Treated with Infliximab
Humira® 160mg/80mgWeek Week Week Week Week
-2 0 1 2 4
Humira® 160mg/80mgPlacebo
CDAI assessment
IBDQ
91 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase III GAIN; intent to treat2007 Adalimumab Induction Therapy for CD Previously Treated with Infliximab2007 Adalimumab Induction Therapy for CD Previously Treated with Infliximab
92 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase III GAIN; patient characteristics2007 Adalimumab Induction Therapy for CD Previously Treated with Infliximab2007 Adalimumab Induction Therapy for CD Previously Treated with Infliximab
93 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase III GAIN; endpoints & results 2007 Ad li b I d ti Th f CD P i l T t d ith I fli i b
• Primary endpoints 66% higher proportion of patients in remission (CDAI score <150) @ week-4
(21% Humira® 160/80mg, 7% placebo)S d d i t
2007 Adalimumab Induction Therapy for CD Previously Treated with Infliximab
• Secondary endpoints proportion of patients in remission 40%/36%/35% higher proportion of patients meeting 70-point ↓ @ week-1/-2/-4
(35%/52%/52% Humira® 160/80mg, 21%/33%/34% placebo) 40%/44%/34% higher proportion of patients meeting 100-point ↓ @ week-1/-2/-440%/44%/34% higher proportion of patients meeting 100 point ↓ @ week 1/ 2/ 4
(20%/37%/38% Humira® 160/80mg, 12%/18%/25% placebo) ∆ CDAI total score from baseline 11 point ↑ mean IBDQ score from baseline @ week-4
(150 Humira® 160/80mg, 139 placebo) 50% increase in IBQD score from baseline @ week 4 50% increase in IBQD score from baseline @ week-4
(30 Humira® 160/80mg, 15 placebo) ↓ CRP levels from baseline @ week-4
(5.0 mg/L Humira® 160/80mg, 7.0 mg/L placebo)x ↓ number of draining fistulas
94 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
x Fistula remission met x not met ~trend

Humira® – Phase III GAIN; endpoints & results 2007 Adalimumab Induction Therapy for CD Previously Treated with Infliximab2007 Adalimumab Induction Therapy for CD Previously Treated with Infliximab
95 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase III GAIN; endpoints & results 2007 Adalimumab Induction Therapy for CD Previously Treated with Infliximab2007 Adalimumab Induction Therapy for CD Previously Treated with Infliximab
96 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Humira® – Phase III GAIN; safety & tolerability 2007 Adalimumab Induction Therapy for CD Previously Treated with Infliximab2007 Adalimumab Induction Therapy for CD Previously Treated with Infliximab
97 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri®
98 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri® – US label; indication
99 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri® – US label; warnings
100 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri® – Clinical trials overview• CD202 Phase IIb (N0192080633)
– 8 week treatment– 3mg/kg, 2 x 3mg/kg, 2 x 6mg/kg or placebo (1:1:1:1)– CDAI endpoints– 248 patients– 11 months recruitment– 8 countries, 35 sites (BE, CZ, DE, DK, IL, NL, SE, UK)
• CD306 Phase II (NCT00055536)12 week treatment– 12 week treatment
– 300mg & Remicade®, or placebo & Remicade® (2:1)– CDAI endpoints– 79 patients– 11 months recruitment– 1 countries, 17 sites (US)
• ENACT-1 Phase III (NCT00032799)ENACT 1 Phase III (NCT00032799)– CDAI (220 -450)– 12 week treatment– 300mg monthly, or placebo (4:1)– CDAI endpoints– 905 patients– 18 months recruitment– 15 countries, 133 sites (AU, CA, CZ, BE, DE, DK, ES, FR, IL, NL, NZ, RSA, SE, UK, US)
• ENACT-2 Phase III (NCT00032786)– CDAI (0-220)– Up to 56 week treatment– 300mg monthly, or placebo (1:1)– CDAI endpoints– 339 patients– Extension of ENACT-1; no recruitment
101 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
– 15 countries, 133 sites (AU, CA, CZ, BE, DE, DK, ES, FR, IL, NL, NZ, RSA, SE, UK, US)

Tysabri® – Clinical trials overview• ENCORE Phase III (NCT00078611)( )
– 12 week treatment– 300mg monthly, or placebo (1:1)– CDAI endpoints– 509 patients– 12 months recruitment– 8 countries, 114 sites (AU, BE, CA, CZ, DE, HU, NZ, US)
CD INFORM Phase IV (NCT00707512)• CD INFORM Phase IV (NCT00707512)– Pharmacovigilance long term PML monitoring program– 2000 patients– 1 country, (US)
• CD305 Phase II induction paediatric (NCT00055367)– 8 week treatment
3mg/kg– 3mg/kg – PCDAI endpoints– 38 patients– 9 months recruitment– 3 countries, 18 sites (AU, UK, US)
• CD352 Phase II maintenance paediatric (NCT00055367)– 2 year treatment– 3mg/kg – PCDAI endpoints– 24 patients– Extension of CD305; no recruitment– 3 countries, 18 sites (AU, UK, US)
102 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri® – Phase IIb CD202; design 2003 Natalizumab for Active Crohn‘s Disease
12-week alternative dosing regimens of Tysabri® vs placeboCD patients (CDAI 220-450)(n=248)
Tysabri® 3mg/kg + placebo2 x 3mg/kg
Week 0 2 4 6 8 12
2 x 6mg/kgPlacebo
CDAI assessment
IBDQ
CRP levels
103 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
IBDQ

Tysabri® – Phase IIb CD202; patient characteristics2003 Natalizumab for Active Crohn‘s Disease
104 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri® – Phase IIb CD202; endpoints & results
• Primary endpoints
2003 Natalizumab for Active Crohn‘s Disease
• Primary endpointsx higher rate of remission (CDAI score <150) @ week-6
(16% Tysabri® 2 x 6mg/kg, 29% Tysabri® 2 x 3mg/kg, 20% Tysabri® 1 x 3mg/kg , 17% placebo)
• Secondary endpoints higher proportion of patients acheiving clinical response at week-4/-6/-8/-12*
(155 Tysabri® 2 x 6mg/kg, 163 Tysabri® 2 x 3mg/kg, 155 Tysabri® 1 x 3mg/kg, 145 placebo)
higher IBDQ scores at week-6 (155 Tysabri® 2 x 6mg/kg, 163 Tysabri® 2 x 3mg/kg, 155 Tysabri® 1 x 3mg/kg, 145 l b )145 placebo)
~ higher IBDQ scores at week-12*(155 Tysabri® 2 x 6mg/kg, 161 Tysabri® 2 x 3mg/kg, 149 Tysabri® 1 x 3mg/kg, 145 placebo)
lower CRP levels*
*exclusively in dose groups with multiple infusions 3 or 6mg/kg
105 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
met x not met ~trend

Tysabri® – Phase IIb CD202; endpoints & results 2003 Natalizumab for Active Crohn‘s Disease
106 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri® – Phase IIb CD202; safety & tolerability 2003 Natalizumab for Active Crohn‘s Disease
107 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri® – ENACT-1/2; design 2005 Natalizumab Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Crohn‘s Disease
10-week induction with Tysabri® vs placebo CD patients (CDAI 220-450), followed by re-randomisation for patients sustaining response between
k 10 d k 12 (CDAI 220)
py
week-10 and week-12 (CDAI ≤220)(n=905/339)
Week 0 4 8 10 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 54
ENACT-1 ENACT-2
Tysabri® 300 mgPlacebo
CDAI assessment
108 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri® – ENACT-1/2; intent to treat2005 Natalizumab Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Crohn‘s Disease
109 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri® – ENACT-1/2; patient characteristics2005 Natalizumab Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Crohn‘s Disease
110 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri® – ENACT-1/2; endpoints & results 2005 Natalizumab Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Crohn‘s Disease
ENACT 1• Primary endpoints at week-10
x higher proportion of patients achieving clinical response (↓CDAI score by 70 pts)(56% Tysabri® 300mg, 49% placebo)
ENACT-1
• Secondary endpoints at week-10x higher rate of clinical remission (CDAI score <150)
(37% Tysabri® 300mg, 30% placebo)
• Primary endpoints at week-3654% higher proportion of patients achieving clinical response (↓CDAI score by
70 pts)
ENACT-2
70 pts) (61% Tysabri® 300mg, 28% placebo)
• Secondary endpoints scores at week-36 41% higher rate of clinical remission (CDAI score <150)
111 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
41% higher rate of clinical remission (CDAI score <150)(44% Tysabri® 300mg, 26% placebo)
met x not met ~trend

Tysabri® – ENACT-1/2; endpoints & results 2005 Natalizumab Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Crohn‘s Disease
112 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri® – ENACT-1/2; endpoints & results 2005 Natalizumab Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Crohn‘s Disease
113 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri® – ENACT-1/2; safety & tolerability 2005 Natalizumab Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Crohn‘s Disease
114 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri® – ENACT-1/2; safety & tolerability 2005 Natalizumab Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Crohn‘s Disease
115 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri® – ENCORE; design 2007 Natalizumab Treatment of Active Crohn‘s Disease; Results of the ENCORE Trial
12-week induction trial Tysabri® vs placebo CD patients (CDAI 220-450)(n=509)
;
Screening Double-blind Follow-up
Tysabri® 300 mgPlacebo
Week -2 0 4 8 12 20
CDAICDAI assessment
CRP levels
IBDQ
SF-36
116 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri® – ENCORE; intent to treat2007 Natalizumab Treatment of Active Crohn‘s Disease; Results of the ENCORE Trial
117 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri® – ENCORE; patient characteristics2007 Natalizumab Treatment of Active Crohn‘s Disease; Results of the ENCORE Trial
118 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri® – ENCORE; endpoints & results
• Primary endpoints
2007 Natalizumab Treatment of Active Crohn‘s Disease; Results of the ENCORE Trial
• Primary endpoints33% higher proportion of patients acheiving clinical response (↓CDAI score by
70 pts) sustained from week-8 to week-12(48% Tysabri® 300mg, 32% placebo)
• Secondary endpoints 38% higher proportion of patients acheiving clinical remission (CDAI score <
150) sustained from week-8 to week-12(26% Tysabri® 300mg, 16% placebo)
27% higher proportion of patients acheiving clinical response (↓CDAI score by27% higher proportion of patients acheiving clinical response (↓CDAI score by 70 pts) @ week-12(60% Tysabri® 300mg, 44% placebo)
35% higher proportion of patients acheiving clinical remission (↓CDAI score by 150 pts) @ week-12(38% Tysabri® 300mg 25% placebo)(38% Tysabri® 300mg, 25% placebo)
119 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
met x not met ~trend

Tysabri® – ENCORE; endpoints & results
• Tertiary endpoints % C
2007 Natalizumab Treatment of Active Crohn‘s Disease; Results of the ENCORE Trial
44% higher proportion achieving a 100-point decrease in baseline CDAI score at both week-8 and -12(39% Tysabri® 300mg, 22% placebo)
27% higher proportion achieving a clinical response (↓CDAI score by 70 pts) at both week-4 and -8(51% Tysabri® 300mg 37% placebo)(51% Tysabri® 300mg, 37% placebo)
proportion achieving a clinical remission (CDAI score < 150) at both week-4 and -8 26 day reduction in time to clinical response, defined as a 70-point decrease in baseline
CDAI score(31 days Tysabri® 300mg, 57 days placebo)
~ time to clinical remission defined as a CDAI score of 150time to clinical remission, defined as a CDAI score of 150(86 days Tysabri® 300mg, undeterminable for placebo)
proportion achieving a clinical response (↓CDAI score by 70 pts) at week-8 mean change from baseline CDAI score at week-4, -8, and -12
(83 pt mean decrease at week-4 Tysabri® 300mg) mean change from baseline platelet count at week-4 -8 and -12 mean change from baseline platelet count at week-4, -8, and -12
(55% Tysabri® 300mg, 25% placebo restored to normal levels) ↓ mean change from baseline CRP level at week-4, -8, and -12
(15 mg/L Tysabri® 300mg, 24.7mg/L placebo at week-12) 11.5 increase mean change in IBDQ from baseline at week-12
(26.7 pts Tysabri® 300mg, 15.2 pts placebo)
120 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
(26.7 pts Tysabri® 300mg, 15.2 pts placebo)- mean change in the SF-36 or its components from baseline at week-12
met x not met ~trend – not reported

Tysabri® – ENCORE; endpoints & results 2007 Natalizumab Treatment of Active Crohn‘s Disease; Results of the ENCORE Trial
121 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri® – ENCORE; endpoints & results 2007 Natalizumab Treatment of Active Crohn‘s Disease; Results of the ENCORE Trial
122 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Tysabri® – ENCORE; safety & tolerability 2007 Natalizumab Treatment of Active Crohn‘s Disease; Results of the ENCORE Trial
123 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia®
124 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® – US label; indication
125 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® – US label; warnings
126 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® – Clinical trials overview• Phase IIb
– 12 week treatment– 100mg, 200mg, 400mg, or placebo (1:1:1:1)– CDAI endpoints– 291 patients– 10 months recruitment– 10 countries, 58 sites (BE, CA, DE, DK, IR, RS, RU, SE, UK, ZA)
• PRECISE 1 (NCT000152490)– 26 week treatment– 400mg monthly or placebo (1:1)– CDAI endpoints– 662 patients– 12 months recruitment– 22 countries, 157 sites (AT, AU, BE, BG, BY, CA, CZ, DE, DK, ET, GE, HK, HU, IT, LV, NO, PL, RU, SI, SE, UA, US, ZA)
PRECISE 2 (NCT000152425)• PRECISE 2 (NCT000152425)– CDAI (220 -450)– 26 week treatment– 400mg monthly, or placebo (1:1)– CDAI endpoints– 668 patients– 10 months recruitment– 15 countries, 147 sites (AU, DE, DK, ES, HU, IR, IL, LI, NO, NZ, PL, UA, US)
• C87042 (NCT00308581)– Remicade® failures– 26 week treatment– 400mg every other month, 200mg every two weeks, or placebo (1:1:1)– CDAI endpoints– 539 patients– 18 months recruitment
127 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
– 18 months recruitment– 14 countries, 107 sites (AT, BE, CA, CH, DE, DK, ES, FR, IT, NL, NO, SE, UK, US)

Cimzia® – Clinical trials overview• C87085 (NCT00552058)
– 6 week treatment– 400mg or placebo (1:1)– CDAI endpoints– 439 patients– 16 months recruitment– 20 countries, 116 sites (AT, AU, BE, BR, CA, CL, CZ, DE, ET, FI, HK, HU, IL, IT, LV, NZ, PL, RO, RU, UA, US)
• MUSIC (NCT00297648)– Mucosal healing– 54 week treatment– 400mg monthly– CDEIS endpoints– 89 patients– 10 months recruitment– 3 countries, 20 sites (BE, DE, FR)
• COSPAR1 (NCT00349752)– Corticosteroid sparing– 38 week treatment– 400mg monthly or placebo– 174 patients– Terminated due to low recruitment– 3 countries, 68 sites (CA, DE, US)
SECURE (NCT00844285)• SECURE (NCT00844285)– Long term safety– 4000 patients
• Japanese studies– NCT00291668 – NCT00329550– NCT00329420
128 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
– NCT00329420

Cimzia® – Clinical trials overview• PRECISE 3 (NCT00160524)
– 84 month treatment– 400mg– Long-term safety– 595 patients– 20 countries, 168 sites (AT, AU, BE, BG, BY, CA, CZ, DE, DK, ET, GE, HK, HU, IT, LV, NO, PL, RU, SI, SE, UA, US, ZA)
• PRECISE 4 (NCT00160706)– 84 month treatment for PRECISE 1 or 2 withdrawals due to CD exacerbation– 400mg monthly– Long-term safety– 310 patients– 20 countries, 127 sites (AT, AU, BE, BG, BY, CA, CZ, DE, DK, ET, GE, HK, HU, IT, LV, NO, PL, RU, SI, SE, UA, US, ZA)
• COSPAR1 (NCT00349752)– Corticosteroid sparing
38 week treatment– 38 week treatment– 400mg monthly or placebo– 174 patients– Terminated due to low recruitment– 3 countries, 68 sites (CA, DE, US)
• SECURE (NCT00844285)– Long term safety– 4000 patients
• Japanese studies– NCT00291668 – NCT00329550– NCT00329420
129 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® – Phase IIb; design 2005 A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Certolizumab Pegol (CDP870) for the Treatment of Crohn‘s Disease
12-week alternative dosing regimens of Cimzia® vs placeboCD patients (CDAI 220-450)(n=291)
, g ( )
Cimzia® 100mg200mg
Week -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
400mgPlacebo
CDAI assessment
IBDQ
CRP levels
130 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
IBDQ

Cimzia® – Phase IIb; intent to treat2005 A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Certolizumab Pegol (CDP870) for the Treatment of Crohn‘s Disease
131 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® – Phase IIb; patient characteristics2005 A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Certolizumab Pegol (CDP870) for the Treatment of Crohn‘s Disease
132 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® – Phase IIb; patient characteristics2005 A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Certolizumab Pegol (CDP870) for the Treatment of Crohn‘s Disease, g ( )
133 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® – Phase IIb; endpoints & results
• Primary endpoints
2005 A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Certolizumab Pegol (CDP870) for the Treatment of Crohn‘s Disease
• Primary endpointsx higher proportion of patients achieving clinical response (↓CDAI score ≥100 or
remission) @ week-12(44.4% Cimzia® 400mg, 36.1% Cimzia® 200mg, 36.5% Cimzia® 100mg , 35.6% placebo)
• Secondary endpointshigher proportion of patients acheiving clinical response at week-2/-4/-6/-8/-10
(33.3% Cimzia® 400mg, 30.6% Cimzia® 200mg, 29.7% Cimzia® 100mg , 15.1% placebo at week-2; 52.8% Cimzia® 400mg, 30.1% placebo at week-10)
x higher remission rate (CDAI score ≤ 150) at week 12x higher remission rate (CDAI score ≤ 150) at week-12(26.4% Cimzia® 400mg, 19.4% Cimzia® 200mg, 27% Cimzia® 100mg , 23.3% placebo)
lower mean CDAI scores15.9 points higher mean IBDQ scores at week-12p g
(156.4 pts Cimzia® 400mg, 140.5 pts placebo) lower CRP levels
134 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
met x not met ~trend

Cimzia® – Phase IIb; endpoints & results 2005 A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Certolizumab Pegol (CDP870) for the Treatment of Crohn‘s Disease
135 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® – Phase IIb; endpoints & results2005 A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Certolizumab Pegol (CDP870) for the Treatment of Crohn‘s Disease
136 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® – Phase IIb; safety & tolerability 2005 A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Certolizumab Pegol (CDP870) for the Treatment of Crohn‘s Disease2005 A Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial of Certolizumab Pegol (CDP870) for the Treatment of Crohn s Disease
137 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® – Phase IIb; safety & tolerability 2005 A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Certolizumab Pegol (CDP870) for the Treatment of Crohn‘s Disease
138 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® – Precise 1; design 2007 Certolizumab Pegol for the Treatment of Crohn‘s Disease
26-week induction & maintenance study of Cimzia® 400mg vs placeboCD patients (CDAI 220-450)(n=662)
g
Cimzia® 400mgWeek
-2 0 2 4 6 8 12 16 20 24 26
Placebo
CDAI assessment
IBDQ
CRP levels
139 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® – Precise 1; intent to treat2007 Certolizumab Pegol for the Treatment of Crohn‘s Disease
140 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® – Precise 1; patient characteristics2007 Certolizumab Pegol for the Treatment of Crohn‘s Disease
141 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® – Precise 1; endpoints & results 2007 Certolizumab Pegol for the Treatment of Crohn‘s Disease
• Primary endpoints
30% higher proportion of patients with baseline serum CRP levels of at least 10mg/L acheiving a reduction of ≥ 100 points in the CDAI score at week-6 (37% Cimzia® 400mg 26% placebo)(37% Cimzia® 400mg, 26% placebo)
45% higher proportion of patients with baseline serum CRP levels of at least 10mg/L acheiving a reduction of ≥100 in CDAI score at both week-6 and week-26(22% Cimzia® 400mg, 12% placebo)
• Secondary endpoints
23% higher proportion of patients regardless of baseline serum CRP levels acheiving a reduction of ≥ 100 points in the CDAI score at week-6 and at both week-6 and week-26(35% Cimzia® 400mg 27% placebo)(35% Cimzia® 400mg, 27% placebo)
x Higher proportion of patients with baseline serum CRP levels of at least 10mg/L acheiving a remission at week-6 and at both week-6 and week-26
x Higher proportion of patients regardless of baseline serum CRP levels acheiving remission at at week-6 and at both week-6 and week-26
142 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
met x not met ~trend

Cimzia® – Precise 1; endpoints & results 2007 Certolizumab Pegol for the Treatment of Crohn‘s Disease
143 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® – Precise 1; endpoints & results 2007 Certolizumab Pegol for the Treatment of Crohn‘s Disease
144 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® – Precise 1; safety & tolerability 2007 Certolizumab Pegol for the Treatment of Crohn‘s Disease
145 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

26 k i d ti & i t t d f Ci i ® 400 l b
Cimzia® – Precise 2; design 2007 Maintenance Therapy with Certolizumab Pegol for Crohn‘s Disease
26-week induction & maintenance study of Cimzia® 400mg vs placeboCD patients (CDAI 220-450)(n=668)
Screening Open label Double-blind
Cimzia® 400mgWeek
-2 0 2 4 6 8 12 16 20 24 26
g p
Placebo
CDAI assessment
IBDQ
CRP levels
146 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® – Precise 2; intent to treat2007 Maintenance Therapy with Certolizumab Pegol for Crohn‘s Disease
147 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® – Precise 2; patient characteristics2007 Maintenance Therapy with Certolizumab Pegol for Crohn‘s Disease
148 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

• Efficacy at week-6
Cimzia® – Precise 2; endpoints & results 2007 Maintenance Therapy with Certolizumab Pegol for Crohn‘s Disease
• 33% higher proportion of patients acheiving a reduction of ≥ 100 points in the CDAI score at week-6 (64% Cimzia® 400mg, 43% placebo)
P i d i t• Primary endpoints45% higher proportion of patients with baseline serum CRP levels of at least
10mg/L acheiving a reduction of ≥ 100 points in the CDAI score at week-26(62% Cimzia® 400mg, 34% placebo)
• Secondary endpoints43% higher proportion of patients regardless of baseline serum CRP levels
acheiving a reduction of ≥ 100 points in the CDAI score at week-26(63% Cimzia® 400mg, 36% placebo) ( g, p )
40% higher remission rate (total CDAI score < 150) in patients regardless of baseline serum CRP levels at week-26(48% Cimzia® 400mg, 29% placebo)
28% higher IBDQ response rate at week-26(60% Ci i ® 400 43% l b )
149 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis
(60% Cimzia® 400mg, 43% placebo)met x not met ~trend

Cimzia® – Precise 2; endpoints & results 2007 Maintenance Therapy with Certolizumab Pegol for Crohn‘s Disease
150 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® – Precise 2; safety & tolerability 2007 Maintenance Therapy with Certolizumab Pegol for Crohn‘s Disease
151 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis

Cimzia® – Precise 2; safety & tolerability 2007 Maintenance Therapy with Certolizumab Pegol for Crohn‘s Disease
152 Lifecycle managementCompetitive intelligence analysis