critical thinking faculty development workshop (feb 2014)

65
CT Course Faculty Development Workshop February 22, 2014 Center for Teaching and Learning

Upload: mandmeister

Post on 16-Jul-2015

139 views

Category:

Education


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

CT Course Faculty Development WorkshopFebruary 22, 2014

Center for Teaching and Learning

Page 2: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

•what’s your 60-second pitch?

With regard to your upcoming CT course . . .

Page 3: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Introductions

Page 4: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

What our students see . . . When they hear the words public health, psychology, math, history

Page 5: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

What we see in our mind’s eye. . .

Page 6: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

So how do we help our students getfrom HERE to HERE?

Page 7: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

•recall

With regard to your upcoming CT course . . .

important concepts, course topics, ideas, facts, theories, arguments

Page 8: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

•use

With regard to your upcoming CT course . . .

post-it notes and personal “white board” to test conceptual framework

Page 9: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

•explain

With regard to your upcoming CT course . . .

conceptual framework to someone else

Page 10: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

•analyze

With regard to your upcoming CT course . . .

partner’s map for inconsistency b/w explanation & representation

Page 11: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

•assess

With regard to your upcoming CT course . . .

how effectively the map represents & integrates course content

Page 12: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

•integrate

With regard to your upcoming CT course . . .

a visual metaphor that clarifies & amplifies the overall structure of knowledge in the course

Page 13: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)
Page 14: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

But why?

Students who become cognizant of the

conceptual structure of their courses are more

likely to employ appropriate discipline-specific

learning strategies. (Saroyen, Amundsen, &

Donald, 2004)

Page 15: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)
Page 16: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Neo and Co. in the Matrix

Page 17: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Neo outsideof the Matrix

Page 18: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Epiphany

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SdkdQtlF-RU

Page 19: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

BREAK TIME

Page 20: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Purpose of Core I

• We all teach and encourage critical thinking in some form or another. So what’s new about CT courses?– Connections: Helping our students situate critical

thinking within a discipline, especially in lower division courses, so they can make connections to other disciplines

– Early Immersion: Capitalizing on opportunities to practice critical thinking through active rather than passive learning, where students have opportunities to DO as well as to OBSERVE

Page 21: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

For our students

expertise often means

to study

which equals a way of KNOWING

Page 22: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

For professionals in the field

expertise often means

to study

which equals a way of KNOWING

BUT . . .

Page 23: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

AND . . .

For professionals in the field

expertise often means

to cultivate a certain habit of mind

which equals a way of SEEING

Page 24: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

AND . . .

For professionals in the field

expertise often means

to acquire a certain set of practices

which equals a way of DOING

Page 25: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Seeing . . .

the discipline as a structure of knowledge

then backing up further to see

the deep structures of inquiry

that connect the disciplines

Page 26: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)
Page 27: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)
Page 28: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)
Page 29: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Salvador Dali, 1976Gala looking at the Mediterranean Sea which at a distance of 20 meters is transformed into the portrait of Abraham Lincoln (Homage to Rothko)

Page 30: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

The Meta View of General Education

• Peruse the maps of your colleagues

• Look for deep structures of inquiry and

knowledge making that may link or

permeate more than one concept

map

• Jot down your observations

Page 31: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Teaching Habits of Mind

using . . .

discipline-specific concept maps

& integrative inquiry maps

– Instructional strategies? TLA = T + L + A

Page 32: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Teaching Habits of Mind

using . . .

objects as themselves

& objects as metaphor

Page 33: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Changing contexts of “production”

1998, anthology1981, pamphlet1981, toilet paper

Page 34: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Changing contexts of

“production”

JUXTAPOSITION of form and content

• A literary “narrative” is not real.

(It’s fiction!)

• A literary narrative is not unreal.

(It’s material--made of ink, glue,

paper.)

Page 35: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Teaching Habits of Mind

using . . .

objects as themselves

atoms, books, photons, words, children,

terrain, cells, geological formations,

shards, families, kidneys, ideas.

– Instructional strategies? TLA = T + L + A

Page 36: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)
Page 37: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Teaching Habits of Mind

using . . .

objects as metaphors

– Instructional strategies? TLA = T + L + A

Page 38: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Doing. . .

the work of the discipline as a “professional”

then backing up further to see

where the skills in a gen ed discipline

connect to the major

Page 39: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Doing. . .

The Big Secret

Page 40: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Teaching a Set of Practices

What discipline-specific performance

tasks do professionals in your field

regularly engage in?

Page 41: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Teaching a Set of Practices

using . . .

performance tasks in the classroom

• CLA in the Classroom

• Problem Based Learning

• Case Based Learning

• Gaming

• Service Learning

Page 42: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Teaching a Set of Practices

using . . .

instructor modeling

student doing

Page 43: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Reading Like a Literary Scholar:Secondary TextsArmstrong, Nancy. Fiction in the Age of Photography: The Legacy of British Realism. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1999.

The Difference That Realism Makes

That Oliver Twist does not refer to a world in which truth takes a visual form is apparent in the protagonist’s

first view of the city:

A dirtier or more wretched place he had never seen. The street was very narrow and muddy; and the air was impregnated with

filthy odours. There were a good many small shops; but the only stock in trade appeared to be heaps of children, who, even at

that time of night, were crawling in and out at the doors, or screaming from the inside. The sole places that seemed to prosper,

amid the general blight of the place, were the public-houses; and in them the lowest orders of Irish were wrangling with might and

main. Covered ways and yards, which here and there diverged from the main street, disclosed little knots of houses, where

drunken men and women were positively wallowing in the filth; and from several of the doorways, great ill-looking fellows were

cautiously emerging: bound, to all appearance, on no very well-disposed or harmless errands. (49)

Everything in this city is identical to its type. Indeed, it is by means of the continuity ensured by

repetition of the type that things and people come to have identity as such, as Dickens here compresses the

kind of information available in treatises on the moral condition of the working classes for his reader’s

benefit. This passage offers as much auditory and olfactory information as visual description, as if one kind

of information (“filthy odours”) can do as well as any other (“heaps of children . . . crawling in and out at

the doors, or screaming from the inside”). This description is not, in other words, particularly visual.

Although he easily conjures up a picture, Dickens feels no inclination to supply colors, textures, or shades

of light and dark.

Page 44: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

• A dirtier or more wretched place he had never seen. The street was very narrow and muddy; and the air was impregnated with filthy odours. There were a good many small shops; but the only stock in trade appeared to be heaps of children, who, even at that time of night, were crawling in and out at the doors, or screaming from the inside. The sole places that seemed to prosper, amid the general blight of the place, were the public-houses; and in them the lowest orders of Irish were wrangling with might and main. Covered ways and yards, which here and there diverged from the main street, disclosed little knots of houses, where drunken men and women were positively wallowing in the filth; and from several of the doorways, great ill-looking fellows were cautiously emerging: bound, to all appearance, on no very well-disposed or harmless errands. (49)

Reading Like a Literary Scholar:Primary Texts

Page 45: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Teaching a Set of Practices

using . . .

performance tasks

instructor modeling & student doing

• Instructional strategies? TLA = T + L + A

Page 46: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

The Unbearable Lightness of “CT”-ness

• Integration of Gen Ed (connections)

• University Learning Outcomes

(authentic immersion)

Page 47: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Integration of Gen Ed: Core II

• Math

• Composition

• Communication

• Science

• Social Science

• Humanities

• Fine Arts

Page 48: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Integration of Gen Ed: Core II

• Introduce your students to the Core

Curriculum and situate your CT course

in the context of different disciplines

• Further developments/thoughts on

concept mapping?

• Other ideas?

Page 49: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

University Learning Outcomes

• Communication Fluency

• Creative Thinking

• Ethical and Civic Thinking

• Information Literacy

• Inquiry Based Thinking

• Integrative Thinking

• Intercultural Thinking

• Metacognitive Thinking

• Quantitative Thinking

Page 50: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

•recall

know

•use

apply

•explain

understand

Page 51: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

•analyze

analyze

•assess

evaluate• integrate

create

Page 52: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

University Learning Outcomes

Run a learning outcomes diagnostic

• the connections activities (anatomy

of the disciplines)

• the immersion activities (teacher-modeling and student-doing)

Page 53: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

The Rubik’s Cube of Course Design

Page 54: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

New in Box

Learning Outcomes

Teaching & Learning Activities

Assessments

Page 55: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Manipulating the Cube

Learning Outcomes

Teaching & Learning Activities

Assessments

• Basic knowledge of GIS terminology

• Skill in mapping local topography

• Exam: multiple ch. & simulation question• Lecture

• Discussion

Page 56: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Move #1: First Look

Learning Outcomes

Teaching & Learning Activities

Assessments

• Basic knowledge of GIS terminology

• Skill in mapping local topography

• Exam: multiple ch. & simulation question• Lecture

• Discussion

Page 57: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Move #1: Second Look

Learning Outcomes

Teaching & Learning Activities

Assessments

• Basic knowledge of GIS terminology

• Skill in mapping local topography

• Exam: multiple ch. & simulation question• Lecture

• Discussion

Page 58: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Move #1: Third Look

Learning Outcomes

Teaching & Learning Activities

Assessments

• Basic knowledge of GIS terminology

• Skill in mapping local topography

• Exam: multiple ch. & simulation question• Lecture

• Discussion

Page 59: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Move #2

Learning Outcomes

Teaching & Learning Activities

Assessments

• Basic knowledge of GIS terminology

• Skill in mapping local topography

• Exam: multiple ch. & simulation question• Lecture

• Discussion

Page 60: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Move #3: Yay!! We’ve solved

it!

Learning Outcomes

Teaching & Learning Activities

Assessments

• Basic knowledge of GIS terminology

• Skill in mapping local topography

• Exam: multiple ch. & simulation question• Lecture

• Discussion

Page 61: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Move #4

Learning Outcomes

Teaching & Learning Activities

Assessments

• Basic knowledge of GIS terminology

• Skill in mapping local topography

• Exam: multiple ch. & simulation question• Lecture

• Discussion• Field work• Hands-on

programming

Page 62: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Move #4: Second Look

Learning Outcomes

Teaching & Learning Activities

Assessments

• Basic knowledge of GIS terminology

• Skill in mapping local topography

• Exam: multiple ch. & simulation question

• Computer file of a GIS map

• Lecture• Discussion• Field work• Hands-on

programming

D. Fink, Creating Significant Learning Experiences, 2003.

Page 63: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

From technique to strategy

Think globally about your course. How might you package and present these learning activities strategically?

– Over time?

– In a certain sequence?

– More than once?

Strategic goals:

– to demystify your discipline (knowing, seeing, doing)

– to help your students make connections between disciplines

Page 64: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

Syllabus P’s and Q’s

The course title should be written like so:

SOC 200: Introduction to Sociology (CT)

The course description should indicate that this course is a critical thinking course and that it meets a Core I “CT” requirement. (If it meets a Core II requirement too, note that as well.)

Include a list of discipline-specific learning outcomes that you may already have, plus the CORE Learning Outcomes selected for your course.

Use the Master Syllabus Template.

Page 65: Critical Thinking Faculty Development Workshop (feb 2014)

“Completion” of the workshop

• Minor: Submission of draft syllabus

• Major: Submission of course

architecture (the invisible overlay that

drives the decisions you make about

outcomes, TLA’s, assessments, and the

order in which you proceed). See

emailed questionnaire.