critical reasoning

62
Put on your Thinking Caps! www.wordpandit.co m Critical Reasoning

Upload: wordpandit

Post on 18-Jan-2015

16.950 views

Category:

Spiritual


1 download

DESCRIPTION

This presentation is an introductory one for critical reasoning. It introduces the topic and its tips can be used to solve CR questions

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Critical reasoning

www.wordpandit.com

Put on yourThinking

Caps!

Critical Reasoning

Page 2: Critical reasoning

Socrates arrives at a bridge guarded by a powerful lord, Plato, and begs to be allowed to cross. Plato replies:

I swear that if the next utterance you make is true I shall let you cross, but if it is false I shall throw you in the water.

Socrates replies:You are going to throw me in the water.

A Reasoning Teaser

www.wordpandit.com

Page 3: Critical reasoning

Socrates arrives at a bridge guarded by a powerful lord, Plato, and begs to be allowed to cross. Plato replies:

I swear that if the next utterance you make is true I shall let you cross, but if it is false I shall throw you in the water.

Socrates replies:You are going to throw me in the water.

If Plato does not throw him in the water, Socrates has spoken falsely and should be thrown in; but if he is thrown in, Socrates has spoken truly and should not be thrown in.

A Reasoning Teaser

What happens next?Is Socrates thrown in the water or not?

www.wordpandit.com

Page 4: Critical reasoning

Socrates arrives at a bridge guarded by a powerful lord, Plato, and begs to be allowed to cross. Plato replies:

I swear that if the next utterance you make is true I shall let you cross, but if it is false I shall throw you in the water.

Socrates replies:You are going to throw me in the water.

If Plato does not throw him in the water, Socrates has spoken falsely and should be thrown in; but if he is thrown in, Socrates has spoken truly and should not be thrown in.

A Reasoning Teaser

What happens next?Is Socrates thrown in the water or not?

www.wordpandit.com

This is what we call a PARADOX.

Page 5: Critical reasoning

Key Terms: Revised

Each CR argument contains at least one premise. Premises are pieces of information that provide evidence used to support the conclusion of the argument. For the purposes of Critical Reasoning arguments, premises are facts not subject to dispute.

The conclusion is the endpoint of the line of reasoning of an argument. Think of it as the result of the argument. The line of reasoning leading to a conclusion is often where errors in logic are made.

www.wordpandit.com

Premise

Conclusion

Page 6: Critical reasoning

Assumptions are unstated facts and logical connections in an argument. In order for the conclusion of an argument to be true, the assumptions upon which that argument is based must also be true.

Central to every CR question is the argument. An argument is an ordered line of reasoning composed of premises, assumptions, and a conclusion. Understanding the elements of an argument is essential to performing well in this section.

Key Terms: Revised

www.wordpandit.com

Assumption

Argument

Page 7: Critical reasoning

Deductive Logic vs. Critical Reasoning: A comparative

1. Most actors are celebrities.2. Aamir is an actor.3. Therefore Aamir is a celebrity.

Have a look at the argument below:

www.wordpandit.com

Page 8: Critical reasoning

Deductive Logic vs. Critical Reasoning: A comparative

1. Most actors are celebrities.2. Aamir is an actor.3. Therefore Aamir is a celebrity.

The argument above is Deductively invalid as it is not consistent.

Have a look at the argument below:

www.wordpandit.com

Page 9: Critical reasoning

Deductive Logic vs. Critical Reasoning: A comparative

1. Most actors are celebrities.2. Aamir is an actor.3. Therefore Aamir is a celebrity.

The argument above is Deductively invalid as it is not consistent.

The argument above is a fairly good Critical Reasoning (CR)argument as the conclusion is more than likely to occur.

Have a look at the argument below:

www.wordpandit.com

Page 10: Critical reasoning

Deductive Logic vs. Critical Reasoning: A comparative

1. Most actors are celebrities.2. Aamir is an actor.3. Therefore Aamir is a celebrity.

The argument above is Deductively invalid as it is not consistent.

The argument above is a fairly good Critical Reasoning (CR)argument as the conclusion is more than likely to occur.

Additional premises can strengthen and weaken the original argument, in case of an CR argument.

Have a look at the argument below:

www.wordpandit.com

Page 11: Critical reasoning

Deductive Logic vs. Critical Reasoning: A comparative

1. Most actors are celebrities.2. Aamir is an actor.3. Therefore Aamir is a celebrity.

The argument above is Deductively invalid as it is not consistent.

The argument above is a fairly good Critical Reasoning (CR)argument as the conclusion is more than likely to occur.

Additional premises can strengthen and weaken the original argument, in case of an CR argument.

For logicians, the term ‘valid’ is only applicable to Deductive arguments.

Have a look at the argument below:

www.wordpandit.com

Page 12: Critical reasoning

A practical Approach to Critical Reasoning questions

Sample Argument:

A girl said to her friend: See that boy and girl. They are holding hands. They must be committed to each other and must be in a relationship.

www.wordpandit.com

Page 13: Critical reasoning

A practical Approach to Critical Reasoning questions

Sample Argument:

A girl said to her friend: See that boy and girl. They are holding hands. They must be committed to each other and must be in a relationship.

Step 1: Identify the Premise

www.wordpandit.com

Page 14: Critical reasoning

A practical Approach to Critical Reasoning questions

Sample Argument:

A girl said to her friend: See that boy and girl. They are holding hands. They must be committed to each other and must be in a relationship.

Premise Indicator words:

because since for for exampleIn that given that as indicated by due toowing to we know this by this can be seen from for the reason that

Step 1: Identify the Premise

The premises of the argument are: ‘A girl said to her friend: See that boy and girl. They are holding hands.’

www.wordpandit.com

Page 15: Critical reasoning

A practical Approach to Critical Reasoning questions

Sample Argument:

A girl said to her friend: See that boy and girl. They are holding hands. They must be committed to each other and must be in a relationship.

www.wordpandit.com

Page 16: Critical reasoning

A practical Approach to Critical Reasoning questions

Sample Argument:

A girl said to her friend: See that boy and girl. They are holding hands. They must be committed to each other and must be in a relationship.

Step 2: Identify the Conclusion

www.wordpandit.com

Page 17: Critical reasoning

A practical Approach to Critical Reasoning questions

Sample Argument:

A girl said to her friend: See that boy and girl. They are holding hands. They must be committed to each other and must be in a relationship.

Conclusion Indicator words:

thus therefore hence consequently as a resultso accordingly clearly must be thatshows that conclude that follows that for this reason

Step 2: Identify the Conclusion

The conclusion of the argument is: ‘They must be committed to each other and must be in a relationship.’

www.wordpandit.com

Page 18: Critical reasoning

Sample Argument:

A girl said to her friend: See that boy and girl. They are holding hands in public. They must be committed to each other and must be in a relationship.

www.wordpandit.com

Page 19: Critical reasoning

Step 3: Identify the assumption

Sample Argument:

A girl said to her friend: See that boy and girl. They are holding hands in public. They must be committed to each other and must be in a relationship.

www.wordpandit.com

Page 20: Critical reasoning

Step 3: Identify the assumption

Sample Argument:

A girl said to her friend: See that boy and girl. They are holding hands in public. They must be committed to each other and must be in a relationship.

Identify the Assumption Answer: In this case, the girl assumes that anyone who holds hands has to be a girlfriend-boyfriend (that is in a relationship). No that wise an assumption, is it?

www.wordpandit.com

Keep in mind:

An assumption is an unstated premise of the argument: that is, an integral component of the argument that the author leaves for granted and unsaid.

In other words, the Argument can be analogized to a house; the Premises are like walls, the conclusion is like the roof, and the Assumptions are like the foundation (the hidden part of the structure).

Page 21: Critical reasoning

Sample Argument:

A girl said to her friend: See that boy and girl. They are holding hands in public. They must be committed to each other and must be in a relationship.

www.wordpandit.com

Page 22: Critical reasoning

Step 4: Weaken the argument

Sample Argument:

A girl said to her friend: See that boy and girl. They are holding hands in public. They must be committed to each other and must be in a relationship.

www.wordpandit.com

Page 23: Critical reasoning

Step 4: Weaken the argument

Sample Argument:

A girl said to her friend: See that boy and girl. They are holding hands in public. They must be committed to each other and must be in a relationship.

Keep in mind:The key to weaken an argument is to undermine the conclusion, not necessarily destroy it.

Following are some examples of words or phrases used to indicate that yourtask is to weaken the argument:Weaken attack undermine refute counterChallenge damage call into question argue against cast doubt

www.wordpandit.com

Page 24: Critical reasoning

Step 4: Weaken the argument

One way to weaken an argument is to attack the assumption of the argument.

Sample Argument:

A girl said to her friend: See that boy and girl. They are holding hands in public. They must be committed to each other and must be in a relationship.

Keep in mind:The key to weaken an argument is to undermine the conclusion, not necessarily destroy it.

Following are some examples of words or phrases used to indicate that yourtask is to weaken the argument:Weaken attack undermine refute counterChallenge damage call into question argue against cast doubt

www.wordpandit.com

Page 25: Critical reasoning

Step 4: Weaken the argument

One way to weaken an argument is to attack the assumption of the argument.

Sample Argument:

A girl said to her friend: See that boy and girl. They are holding hands in public. They must be committed to each other and must be in a relationship.

Weaken the argument Answer: All we need to say is something as simple as this:A cousin was helping another by holding her hand. (This way they do not have to be in a relationship)

Keep in mind:The key to weaken an argument is to undermine the conclusion, not necessarily destroy it.

Following are some examples of words or phrases used to indicate that yourtask is to weaken the argument:Weaken attack undermine refute counterChallenge damage call into question argue against cast doubt

www.wordpandit.com

Page 26: Critical reasoning

Sample Argument:

A girl said to her friend: See that boy and girl. They are holding hands in public. They must be committed to each other and must be in a relationship.

www.wordpandit.com

Page 27: Critical reasoning

Step 5: Strengthen the argument

Sample Argument:

A girl said to her friend: See that boy and girl. They are holding hands in public. They must be committed to each other and must be in a relationship.

www.wordpandit.com

Page 28: Critical reasoning

Step 5: Strengthen the argument

Sample Argument:

A girl said to her friend: See that boy and girl. They are holding hands in public. They must be committed to each other and must be in a relationship.

Keep in mind:Strengthen questions ask you to support the argument in any way possible. Speaking in numerical terms, any answer choice that strengthens the argument, whether by 1% or by 100%, is correct.

Following are some examples of words or phrases used to indicate that yourtask is to strengthen the argument:Strenghten support helps most justifies

www.wordpandit.com

Page 29: Critical reasoning

Step 5: Strengthen the argument

One way to strengthen an argument is to support the assumption of the argument.

Sample Argument:

A girl said to her friend: See that boy and girl. They are holding hands in public. They must be committed to each other and must be in a relationship.

Keep in mind:Strengthen questions ask you to support the argument in any way possible. Speaking in numerical terms, any answer choice that strengthens the argument, whether by 1% or by 100%, is correct.

Following are some examples of words or phrases used to indicate that yourtask is to strengthen the argument:Strenghten support helps most justifies

www.wordpandit.com

Page 30: Critical reasoning

Step 5: Strengthen the argument

One way to strengthen an argument is to support the assumption of the argument.

Sample Argument:

A girl said to her friend: See that boy and girl. They are holding hands in public. They must be committed to each other and must be in a relationship.

Strengthen the argument: All we need to say is something as simple as this:In modern times, holding hands in public has become the symbol of relationships.(This way they do not have to be in a relationship)

Keep in mind:Strengthen questions ask you to support the argument in any way possible. Speaking in numerical terms, any answer choice that strengthens the argument, whether by 1% or by 100%, is correct.

Following are some examples of words or phrases used to indicate that yourtask is to strengthen the argument:Strenghten support helps most justifies

www.wordpandit.com

Page 31: Critical reasoning

PRACTICE QUESTIONS

www.wordpandit.com

Page 32: Critical reasoning

Q1. Bicycles are safer than scooters. 50 percent of scooter accidents result in death, while only 10 percent of bicycle accidents result in death.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument above?

A. Bicycles are inspected more often than scooters. B. The number of bicycle accidents is several hundred thousand times higher than

the number of scooter accidents.C. Many bicycle owners are known not to stop on traffic lights whereas a most scooter

owners follow the regulation. D. Scooter accidents are generally the fault of car owners, who bang into them and

not those of the ones driving the scooters. E. Bicycles do not carry pillions generally but scooters do.

www.wordpandit.com

Page 33: Critical reasoning

Q1. Bicycles are safer than scooters. 50 percent of scooter accidents result in death, while only 10 percent of bicycle accidents result in death.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument above?

A. Bicycles are inspected more often than scooters. B. The number of bicycle accidents is several hundred thousand times higher than

the number of scooter accidents.C. Many bicycle owners are known not to stop on traffic lights whereas a most scooter

owners follow the regulation. D. Scooter accidents are generally the fault of car owners, who bang into them and

not those of the ones driving the scooters. E. Bicycles do not carry pillions generally but scooters do.

www.wordpandit.com

Correct Answer: B

Page 34: Critical reasoning

Q2. A world-renowned painter recently won a lawsuit against an ice-cream manufacturer for commiserating another graphic designer to design the ice-cream’s packing in a style similar to the painter. Because of the judgment of the case, manufacturers will have to stop asking graphic designers now to copy the freely available designs of famous painters. And the end result will an increase in the cost of package design as employing the services of known artists would cost more than those of graphic designer that merely imitate their style.

The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?

A. People cannot distinguish between an original work and its imitation. B. Manufacturers will continue to use well-known painting styles in their packaging. C. Ice-ream manufacturers around the country are shocked by this judgment. D. Manufacturers will continue to use graphic artists to imitate the artistic style of

famous painters.E. The sale of the product depends on its packaging.

www.wordpandit.com

Page 35: Critical reasoning

Q2. A world-renowned painter recently won a lawsuit against an ice-cream manufacturer for commiserating another graphic designer to design the ice-cream’s packing in a style similar to the painter. Because of the judgment of the case, manufacturers will have to stop asking graphic designers now to copy the freely available designs of famous painters. And the end result will an increase in the cost of package design as employing the services of known artists would cost more than those of graphic designer that merely imitate their style.

The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?

A. People cannot distinguish between an original work and its imitation. B. Manufacturers will continue to use well-known painting styles in their packaging. C. Ice-ream manufacturers around the country are shocked by this judgment. D. Manufacturers will continue to use graphic artists to imitate the artistic style of

famous painters.E. The sale of the product depends on its packaging.

www.wordpandit.com

Correct Answer: B

Page 36: Critical reasoning

Q3. Navneet Pencils manufactures and sells the same pencils as Camlin does. Employee wages account for forty percent of the cost of manufacturing pencils at both factories. Navneet is seeking a competitive edge over Camlin’s supply. Therefore, to promote this end, Navneet’s should lower employee wages.

Which of the following, if true, seriously weakens the argument above?  A. Because they make a small number of specialty artist’s pencils, pencil

manufacturers cannot receive volume discounts on raw materials. B. Lowering wages would reduce the quality of employee work and this reduced

quality would lead to lowered sales. C. Navneet’s Pencils has taken away twenty percent of Camlin’s Supply business

over the last year. D. Camlin’s Supply pays its employees, on average, ten percent more than does

Navneet’s Pencils. E. Many people who work for manufacturing plants live in areas in which the

manufacturing plant they work for is the only industry.

www.wordpandit.com

Page 37: Critical reasoning

Q3. Navneet Pencils manufactures and sells the same pencils as Camlin does. Employee wages account for forty percent of the cost of manufacturing pencils at both factories. Navneet is seeking a competitive edge over Camlin’s supply. Therefore, to promote this end, Navneet’s should lower employee wages.

Which of the following, if true, seriously weakens the argument above?  A. Because they make a small number of specialty artist’s pencils, pencil

manufacturers cannot receive volume discounts on raw materials. B. Lowering wages would reduce the quality of employee work and this reduced

quality would lead to lowered sales. C. Navneet’s Pencils has taken away twenty percent of Camlin’s Supply business

over the last year. D. Camlin’s Supply pays its employees, on average, ten percent more than does

Navneet’s Pencils. E. Many people who work for manufacturing plants live in areas in which the

manufacturing plant they work for is the only industry.

www.wordpandit.com

Correct Answer: B

Page 38: Critical reasoning

Q4. In some cities, many writers have been winning acclaim as artists. But since writing must be useful, writers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product. For this reason, writing is not an art.

Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reason given for that conclusion?

 A. Some books are written to be placed in research labs where they will not be used

by anyone. B. Some writers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the

products they produce. C. Writers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than

they currently are. D. Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products. E. An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the objects’ practical

utility.

www.wordpandit.com

Page 39: Critical reasoning

Q4. In some cities, many writers have been winning acclaim as artists. But since writing must be useful, writers must exercise their craft with an eye to the practical utility of their product. For this reason, writing is not an art.

Which of the following is an assumption that supports drawing the conclusion above from the reason given for that conclusion?

 A. Some books are written to be placed in research labs where they will not be used

by anyone. B. Some writers are more concerned than others with the practical utility of the

products they produce. C. Writers should be more concerned with the practical utility of their products than

they currently are. D. Artists are not concerned with the monetary value of their products. E. An object is not an art object if its maker pays attention to the objects’ practical

utility.

www.wordpandit.com

Correct Answer: E

Page 40: Critical reasoning

5. Unlike the price of gold, the price of silver has fallen considerably in the last year. Thus, although the retail price of jewelry made with silver other than gold has not yet fallen, it will inevitably fall.

 Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?  A. Changes in retail prices always lag behind changes in raw-material prices.B. The price of gold is typically higher than that of the same volume of silver. C. The operating costs of the average retail jewelry shop have remained constant

during the last year. D. The cost of mining all expensive metals other than gold has increased in the last

year. E. The cost of processing silver has increased during the last year.

www.wordpandit.com

Page 41: Critical reasoning

5. Unlike the price of gold, the price of silver has fallen considerably in the last year. Thus, although the retail price of jewelry made with silver other than gold has not yet fallen, it will inevitably fall.

 Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?  A. Changes in retail prices always lag behind changes in raw-material prices.B. The price of gold is typically higher than that of the same volume of silver. C. The operating costs of the average retail jewelry shop have remained constant

during the last year. D. The cost of mining all expensive metals other than gold has increased in the last

year. E. The cost of processing silver has increased during the last year.

www.wordpandit.com

Correct Answer: E

Page 42: Critical reasoning

6. Physician: In itself, exercise does not cause heart attacks; rather, a sudden increase in an exercise regimen can be a cause. When people of any physical condition suddenly increase their amount of exercise, they also increase their risk of heart attack. As a result, there will be an increased risk of heart attack among employees of this company due to the new health program. The conclusion drawn by the physician follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?(A) Employees will abruptly increase their amount of exercise as a result of the new health program.(B) The exercised involved in the new health program are more strenuous than those in the previous health program.(C) The new health program will force employees of all levels of health to exercise regularly.(D)The new health program constitutes a sudden change in the company’s policy(E) All employees, no matter what their physical condition, will participate in the new health program.

www.wordpandit.com

Page 43: Critical reasoning

6. Physician: In itself, exercise does not cause heart attacks; rather, a sudden increase in an exercise regimen can be a cause. When people of any physical condition suddenly increase their amount of exercise, they also increase their risk of heart attack. As a result, there will be an increased risk of heart attack among employees of this company due to the new health program. The conclusion drawn by the physician follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?(A) Employees will abruptly increase their amount of exercise as a result of the new health program.(B) The exercised involved in the new health program are more strenuous than those in the previous health program.(C) The new health program will force employees of all levels of health to exercise regularly.(D)The new health program constitutes a sudden change in the company’s policy(E) All employees, no matter what their physical condition, will participate in the new health program.

Correct Answer: A

www.wordpandit.com

Page 44: Critical reasoning

7. Economist: Technology now changes so rapidly that workers need periodic retraining. Such retraining can be efficient only if it allows individual companies to meet their own short-term needs. Hence, large governmental job retraining programs are no longer a viable option in the effort to retrain workers efficiently. Which one of the following is an assumption required by the economist’s argument?(A) Workers did not need to be retrained when the pace of technological change was slower than it is currently.(B) Large job retraining programs will be less efficient than smaller programs if the pace of technological change slows.(C) No single type of retraining program is most efficient at retraining technological workers.(D) Large governmental job retraining programs do not meet the short-term needs of different individual companies.(E) Technological workers are more likely now than in the past to move in order to find work for which they are already trained.

www.wordpandit.com

Page 45: Critical reasoning

7. Economist: Technology now changes so rapidly that workers need periodic retraining. Such retraining can be efficient only if it allows individual companies to meet their own short-term needs. Hence, large governmental job retraining programs are no longer a viable option in the effort to retrain workers efficiently. Which one of the following is an assumption required by the economist’s argument?(A) Workers did not need to be retrained when the pace of technological change was slower than it is currently.(B) Large job retraining programs will be less efficient than smaller programs if the pace of technological change slows.(C) No single type of retraining program is most efficient at retraining technological workers.(D) Large governmental job retraining programs do not meet the short-term needs of different individual companies.(E) Technological workers are more likely now than in the past to move in order to find work for which they are already trained.

Correct Answer: D

www.wordpandit.com

Page 46: Critical reasoning

8. Thirty years ago, the percentage of the British people who vacationed in foreign countries was very small compared with the large percentage of the British population who travel abroad for vacations now. Foreign travel is, and always has been, expensive from Britain. Therefore, British people must have, on average, more money to spend on vacations now than they did 30 years ago. The argument requires assuming which one of the following?(A) If foreign travel had been less expensive 30 years ago, British people would still not have had enough money to take vacation abroad.(B) If travel to Britain were less expensive, more people of other countries would travel to Britain for their vacations.(C) If the percentage of British people vacationing abroad was lower 30 years ago, then the British people of 30 years ago must have spent more money on domestic vacations.(D) If more of the British people 30 years ago had had enough money to vacation abroad, more would have done so.(E) If British people are now wealthier than they were 30 years ago, then they must have more money to spend on vacations now than they did 30 years ago.

www.wordpandit.com

Page 47: Critical reasoning

8. Thirty years ago, the percentage of the British people who vacationed in foreign countries was very small compared with the large percentage of the British population who travel abroad for vacations now. Foreign travel is, and always has been, expensive from Britain. Therefore, British people must have, on average, more money to spend on vacations now than they did 30 years ago. The argument requires assuming which one of the following?(A) If foreign travel had been less expensive 30 years ago, British people would still not have had enough money to take vacation abroad.(B) If travel to Britain were less expensive, more people of other countries would travel to Britain for their vacations.(C) If the percentage of British people vacationing abroad was lower 30 years ago, then the British people of 30 years ago must have spent more money on domestic vacations.(D) If more of the British people 30 years ago had had enough money to vacation abroad, more would have done so.(E) If British people are now wealthier than they were 30 years ago, then they must have more money to spend on vacations now than they did 30 years ago.

Correct Answer: D

www.wordpandit.com

Page 48: Critical reasoning

9. Some teachers claim that students would not learn curricular content without the incentive of grades. But students with intense interest in the material would learn it without this incentive, while the behavior of students lacking all interests in the material is unaffected by such an incentive. The incentive of grades, therefore, serves no essential academic purpose. The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument(A) take for granted that the only purpose of school is to convey a fixed body of information to students(B) takes for granted that students who are indifferent to the grades they receive are genuinely interested in the curricular material(C) fails to consider that the incentive of grades may serve some useful nonacademic purpose(D) ignore the possibility that students who lack interest in the curricular material would be quite interested in it if allowed to choose their own curricular material(E) fails to consider that some students may be neither fascinated by nor completely indifferent to the subject being taught

www.wordpandit.com

Page 49: Critical reasoning

9. Some teachers claim that students would not learn curricular content without the incentive of grades. But students with intense interest in the material would learn it without this incentive, while the behavior of students lacking all interests in the material is unaffected by such an incentive. The incentive of grades, therefore, serves no essential academic purpose. The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument(A) take for granted that the only purpose of school is to convey a fixed body of information to students(B) takes for granted that students who are indifferent to the grades they receive are genuinely interested in the curricular material(C) fails to consider that the incentive of grades may serve some useful nonacademic purpose(D) ignore the possibility that students who lack interest in the curricular material would be quite interested in it if allowed to choose their own curricular material(E) fails to consider that some students may be neither fascinated by nor completely indifferent to the subject being taught

Correct Answer: E

www.wordpandit.com

Page 50: Critical reasoning

10. Last year a large firm set a goal of decreasing its workforce by 25%. Three divisions, totaling 25% of its workforce, were to be eliminated and no new people hired. These divisions have since been eliminated and no new people have joined the firm, but its workforce has decreased by only 15%. Which one of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the difference in the planned versus the actual reduction in the workforce?(A)The three divisions that were eliminated were well run and had the potential to earn profits.(B)Normal attrition in the retained divisions continued to reduce staff because no new people were added to the firm.(C)Some of the employees in the eliminated divisions were eligible for early retirement and chose that option.(D)As the divisions were being eliminated some of their employees were assigned to other divisions.(E) Employees in the retained divisions were forced to work faster to offset the loss of the eliminated divisions.

www.wordpandit.com

Page 51: Critical reasoning

10. Last year a large firm set a goal of decreasing its workforce by 25%. Three divisions, totaling 25% of its workforce, were to be eliminated and no new people hired. These divisions have since been eliminated and no new people have joined the firm, but its workforce has decreased by only 15%. Which one of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the difference in the planned versus the actual reduction in the workforce?(A)The three divisions that were eliminated were well run and had the potential to earn profits.(B)Normal attrition in the retained divisions continued to reduce staff because no new people were added to the firm.(C)Some of the employees in the eliminated divisions were eligible for early retirement and chose that option.(D)As the divisions were being eliminated some of their employees were assigned to other divisions.(E) Employees in the retained divisions were forced to work faster to offset the loss of the eliminated divisions.

Correct Answer: D

www.wordpandit.com

Page 52: Critical reasoning

11. Every year, new reports appear concerning the health risks posed by certain substances, such as coffee and sugar. One year an article claimed that coffee is dangerous to one’s health. The next year, another article argued that coffee has some benefits for one’s health. From these contradictory opinions, we see that experts are useless for guiding one’s decisions about one’s health. Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the argument above?(A) The argument takes for granted that coffee is dangerous to one’s health.(B) The argument presumes, without providing warrant, that one always wants expert guidance in making decisions about one’s health.(C) The argument fails to consider the nature of expert opinion in areas other than health.(D) The argument presumes, with out providing justification, that because expert opinion is trustworthy in one case, it must therefore be trustworthy in all cases.(E) The argument fails to consider that coffee may be harmful to one’s health in some respects and beneficial in others.

www.wordpandit.com

Page 53: Critical reasoning

11. Every year, new reports appear concerning the health risks posed by certain substances, such as coffee and sugar. One year an article claimed that coffee is dangerous to one’s health. The next year, another article argued that coffee has some benefits for one’s health. From these contradictory opinions, we see that experts are useless for guiding one’s decisions about one’s health. Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the argument above?(A) The argument takes for granted that coffee is dangerous to one’s health.(B) The argument presumes, without providing warrant, that one always wants expert guidance in making decisions about one’s health.(C) The argument fails to consider the nature of expert opinion in areas other than health.(D) The argument presumes, with out providing justification, that because expert opinion is trustworthy in one case, it must therefore be trustworthy in all cases.(E) The argument fails to consider that coffee may be harmful to one’s health in some respects and beneficial in others.

Correct Answer: E

www.wordpandit.com

Page 54: Critical reasoning

12. Mystery stories often feature a brilliant detective and the detective’s dull companion. Clues are presented in the story, and the companion wrongly infers an inaccurate solution to the mystery using the same clues that the detective uses to deduce the correct solution. Thus, the author’s strategy of including the dull companion gives readers a chance to solve the mystery while also diverting them from the correct solution. Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?(A) Most mystery stories feature a brilliant detective who solves the mystery presented in the story.(B) Mystery readers often solve the mystery in a story simply by spotting the mistakes in the reasoning of the detective’s dull companion in that story.(C) Some mystery stories give readers enough clues to infer the correct solution to the mystery.(D) The actions of the brilliant detective in a mystery story rarely divert readers from the actions of the detective’s dull companion.(E) The detective’s dull companion in a mystery story generally uncovers the misleading clues that divert readers from the mystery’s correct solution.

www.wordpandit.com

Page 55: Critical reasoning

12. Mystery stories often feature a brilliant detective and the detective’s dull companion. Clues are presented in the story, and the companion wrongly infers an inaccurate solution to the mystery using the same clues that the detective uses to deduce the correct solution. Thus, the author’s strategy of including the dull companion gives readers a chance to solve the mystery while also diverting them from the correct solution. Which one of the following is most strongly supported by the information above?(A) Most mystery stories feature a brilliant detective who solves the mystery presented in the story.(B) Mystery readers often solve the mystery in a story simply by spotting the mistakes in the reasoning of the detective’s dull companion in that story.(C) Some mystery stories give readers enough clues to infer the correct solution to the mystery.(D) The actions of the brilliant detective in a mystery story rarely divert readers from the actions of the detective’s dull companion.(E) The detective’s dull companion in a mystery story generally uncovers the misleading clues that divert readers from the mystery’s correct solution.

Correct Answer: C

www.wordpandit.com

Page 56: Critical reasoning

13. In speech, when words or sentences are ambiguous, gesture and tone of voice are used to indicate the intended meaning. Writers, of course, cannot use gesture or tone of voice and must rely instead on style; the reader detects the writer’s intention from the arrangement of words and sentences. Which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information above?(A) The primary function of style in writing is to augment the literal meanings of the words and sentences used.(B) The intended meaning of a piece of writing is indicated in part by the writer’s arrangement of words and sentences.(C) It is easier for a listener to detect the tone of a speaker than for a reader to detect the style of the writer.(D) A writer’s intention will always be interpreted differently by different readers.(E) The writer’s arrangement of words/sentences completely determines the aesthetics of writing. 

www.wordpandit.com

Page 57: Critical reasoning

13. In speech, when words or sentences are ambiguous, gesture and tone of voice are used to indicate the intended meaning. Writers, of course, cannot use gesture or tone of voice and must rely instead on style; the reader detects the writer’s intention from the arrangement of words and sentences. Which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by the information above?(A) The primary function of style in writing is to augment the literal meanings of the words and sentences used.(B) The intended meaning of a piece of writing is indicated in part by the writer’s arrangement of words and sentences.(C) It is easier for a listener to detect the tone of a speaker than for a reader to detect the style of the writer.(D) A writer’s intention will always be interpreted differently by different readers.(E) The writer’s arrangement of words/sentences completely determines the aesthetics of writing. 

Correct Answer: B

www.wordpandit.com

Page 58: Critical reasoning

14. Bureaucratic mechanisms are engineered to resist change. Thus, despite growing dissatisfaction with complex bureaucratic systems, it is unlikely that bureaucracies will be simplified. The claim that bureaucratic mechanisms are engineered to resist change plays which one of the following roles in the argument?(A) It is a premise offered in support of the claim that it is unlikely that bureaucracies will be simplified.(B) It is a conclusion for which the only support offered is the claim that dissatisfaction with complex bureaucratic systems is growing.(C) It is cited as evidence that bureaucratic systems are becoming more and more complex.(D) It is used to weaken the claim that bureaucracies should be simplified.(E) It is a conclusion for which the claim that bureaucracies are unlikely to be simplified is offered as support.

www.wordpandit.com

Page 59: Critical reasoning

14. Bureaucratic mechanisms are engineered to resist change. Thus, despite growing dissatisfaction with complex bureaucratic systems, it is unlikely that bureaucracies will be simplified. The claim that bureaucratic mechanisms are engineered to resist change plays which one of the following roles in the argument?(A) It is a premise offered in support of the claim that it is unlikely that bureaucracies will be simplified.(B) It is a conclusion for which the only support offered is the claim that dissatisfaction with complex bureaucratic systems is growing.(C) It is cited as evidence that bureaucratic systems are becoming more and more complex.(D) It is used to weaken the claim that bureaucracies should be simplified.(E) It is a conclusion for which the claim that bureaucracies are unlikely to be simplified is offered as support.

Correct Answer: A

www.wordpandit.com

Page 60: Critical reasoning

15. Philosopher: Scientists talk about the pursuit of truth, but like most people, they are self-interested. Accordingly, the professional activities of most scientists are directed toward personal career enhancement, and only incidentally toward the pursuit of truth. Hence, the activities of the scientific community are largely directed toward enhancing the status of that community as a whole, and only incidentally toward the pursuit of truth. The reasoning in the philosopher’s argument is flawed because the argument(A) Improperly infers that each and every scientist has a certain characteristic from premise that most scientists have that characteristic(B) Improperly draws an inference about the scientific community as a whole from a premise about individual scientists(C) Presumes, without giving justification, that the aim of personal career enhancement never advances the pursuit of truth(D) Illicitly takes advantage of an ambiguity in the meaning of “self-interested”(E)Improperly draws an inference about a cause from premises about its effects

www.wordpandit.com

Page 61: Critical reasoning

15. Philosopher: Scientists talk about the pursuit of truth, but like most people, they are self-interested. Accordingly, the professional activities of most scientists are directed toward personal career enhancement, and only incidentally toward the pursuit of truth. Hence, the activities of the scientific community are largely directed toward enhancing the status of that community as a whole, and only incidentally toward the pursuit of truth. The reasoning in the philosopher’s argument is flawed because the argument(A) Improperly infers that each and every scientist has a certain characteristic from premise that most scientists have that characteristic(B) Improperly draws an inference about the scientific community as a whole from a premise about individual scientists(C) Presumes, without giving justification, that the aim of personal career enhancement never advances the pursuit of truth(D) Illicitly takes advantage of an ambiguity in the meaning of “self-interested”(E)Improperly draws an inference about a cause from premises about its effects

Correct Answer: B

www.wordpandit.com

Page 62: Critical reasoning

Thank You!Hope you had a pleasant

learning experience.Feel free to contact us:

[email protected]

www.wordpandit.com