critical factors for developing economically viable electricity storage projects
DESCRIPTION
Critical Factors for Developing Economically ViableElectricity Storage Projects.TRANSCRIPT
7/17/2009
1
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Critical Factors forDeveloping Economically ViableDeveloping Economically Viable
Electricity Storage Projects Presented by
Rahul Walawalkar Ph.D., CEM, CDSMSr. Energy Consultant
Customized Energy Solutions Ltd.1528 Walnut Street, 22nd FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103 USA
Phone: 215‐875‐9440Fax: 215‐875‐9490info@ces‐ltd.com
Presented at thePresented at the
Storage WeekStorage WeekSan Diego, CaSan Diego, Ca
July 14July 14thth, 2009, 2009
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Agenda:
Energy Storage Technologies & Electricity Markets
Factors affecting Economic viability of EESEES Design, performance & capabilities
Market Design, Rules & Barriers
Project FinancingOther Factors (Fuel price, environmental regulations & competition)
Questions ???
2
7/17/2009
2
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Overview of Electricity Markets
3Source: FERC: http://www.ferc.gov/industries/electric/indus‐act/rto/rto‐map.asp
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
ts Available for commercial order
o Preconstruction and licensing period
C Finalized cost estimateDesign/construction period
EES for Electric Utility Applications
• Pumped Hydro Energy Storage
• Compressed Air Energy Storage Design/construction period
l First commercial service
at
I 2nd plant in service
pa 3rd plant
C <--estimate actual--> 4th plant 5th plant
t Development period
I cost estimate Mature plant cost---------->
n Simplif ied cost estimate w ith incomplete data
U
p gy g
• Sodium Sulfur (NAS)
• Flow Batteries (VRB/ZBB)
• Flywheels (Beacon)
• Li‐Ion Batteries (Altairnano/ A123)
NAS
4
ZBB
VRB/Prudent Energy
Flywheel
7/17/2009
3
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Opportunities for Energy Storage
Energy Arbitrage Ancillary ServicesAncillary Services
Regulation Operating ReservesVoltage Support
Installed Capacity Deferral of investment in
P ki G tiPeaking Generation Transmission & Distribution
Supporting integration of renewables
5
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Factors Affecting EES Economics
EES Design, Performance & CapabilitiesTechnology selectionPower & Energy ratingLife expectancy Round Trip EfficiencyResponse rate & any other operating considerationsResponse rate & any other operating considerationsFootprint & any special permitting requirementsCapability to meet requirements for different markets
6
7/17/2009
4
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
EES Selection: Discharge Time & System Power Rating
Source: Electricity Storage Association 7
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Round Trip Efficiency & EES Utilization
8
7/17/2009
5
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
~51% increase over daily operation
Net Revenues with different CAES Configurations
CAES ConfigurationHeat Rate
ual Reven
ue $ / M
W
Heat RateEnergy RatioPower RatioRamp rate Response time Storage
0.50 0.75 1.00 (Daily) 1.00 (Monthly) Power Ratio
Ann
u
9
Duration
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Factors Affecting EES Economics
Market DesignAccess to various markets for
energy,
ancillary services
capacity
Generation Supply mix & Demand CurveMarket sizeLocational factors Electric transmission network & interconnection
10
7/17/2009
6
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Comparison of ISOs/ RTOs
11
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Recent changes in Market Design
FERC Orders 890: open regulation markets to non‐gen resources 719: demand response and long term power contracts719: demand response and long term power contracts
PJM & NYISO opened up ancillary service markets for demand side resources during 2007‐08ISO‐NE initiated pilot program for alternative technologies participation in regulation marketCreation of a new category for ancillary services to g y yremove barriers for energy limited resources
NYISO: Limited Energy Storage Resources (LESR)MISO: Stored Energy Resource (SER)
CAISO has proposed a EES Pilot for ancillary services
12
7/17/2009
7
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Factors Affecting EES Economics
EES Revenues & Cost
On Peak Energy Revenues
Off Peak Charging Costs
Ancillary Service Revenues
Capacity revenues
Interconnection costs
Natural Gas price
13
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
NYISO Net Load - 2006
35000
NYISO - Net Load - Yr 2006
n
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
MW
1-Ja
n13
-Jan
25-J
an6-
Feb
18-F
eb1-
Mar
13-M
ar
25-M
ar
6-Ap
r
18-A
pr
30-A
pr
12-M
ay
24-M
ay
5-Ju
n
17-J
un
29-J
un
11-J
ul
23-J
ul
4-Au
g
16-A
ug
28-A
ug
9-S
ep
21-S
ep
3-O
ct
15-O
ct
27-O
ct
8-N
ov
20-N
ov
2-D
ec
14-D
ec
26-D
ec
S1S5S9S13S17S21Days in Year
Hrs in Day
14
7/17/2009
8
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Short Run Marginal Cost Curve
15
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Location, Location, Location
• NYISO • PJM
NY WestNY
EastWest
Central
East
South
16
NYC
• PJM East: AECO, DPL, JCPL, METED, PECO, PPL, PSEG, RECO
• PJM Central: PENELEC, APS• PJM South: DOM, BGE, PEPCO • PJM West: COMED, AEP, DAY, DUQ
• NYC: NYC, Long Island• NY East: Capital, Hudson Valley, Millwood,
Dunwoodie• NY West: West, Genesee, Central, Mohawk
Valley, North
7/17/2009
9
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Congestion Example
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
NYISO & PJM LMP Profiles (2001-09*)
18* Partial year data as of June 2009
7/17/2009
10
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Effect of Location & Efficiency on Net Revenue
19
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Effect of Natural Gas Price in NYISO
20
7/17/2009
11
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Average Daily LMP Curves for each month in NYC
21
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Ancillary Service Revenue
22
7/17/2009
12
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Regulation Price Profiles NYISO (2001-09)
23
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Probability Curve for Expected Regulation Revenues
24
7/17/2009
13
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Capacity Credit
NYISO has a locational ICAP requirement80% for NYC97.5% for Long Island
PJM uses Reliability Pricing Mechanism (RPM) to set up locational capacity pricesFuture capacity prices will be influenced by
demand growth Energy and ancillary service revenuesGeneration addition / retirements as well as DRCost of new generation technologies
25
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Other Factors Affecting EES Economics
Financing FactorsCapital CostsReal estate and taxes Cost of borrowingConstruction, permitting & interconnection period
26
7/17/2009
14
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Impact of capital cost on economics of CAES in NY
27
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Other Factors Affecting EES Economics
Transmission / Distribution UpgradesImpact of wind & renewable integrationImpact of wind & renewable integrationImpact of environmental regulations
Renewable Portfolio Standard mandatesNYS 15x15 Program InitiativeCarbon Tax
28
7/17/2009
15
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Transmission Infrastructure
29National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
PJM: Proposed new transmission projects
30
Source: PJM
7/17/2009
16
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Impact of Renewables
PJM has 40GW + wind projects in interconnection queueCurrent wind penetration is 1.3 GW
NYISO is anticipating more than 3 GW of wind being added on the grid in next 3-4 years
Current wind penetration is 1 GWRepresents around 10% of peak load for NYISO
20-30% of off peak loadMay result in increased regulation and ancillary service requirementsCan improve the case for energy arbitrage by lowering off peak prices
31
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Occurrence of Negative LMPs in NYISO Zones
32
7/17/2009
17
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Distribution of –ve LMPs
33
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Conclusions
• Electricity markets across US allow or are working on allowing EES to participate in energy, ancillary services & capacity markets.
• The economic feasibility of EES will depend on factors including– Design parameters
– Market Structure and location
– Ability to capture multiple revenue streams
– Financing
– Environmental regulations
– For large scale integration of EES it is important that technology developers and market participants, as well as potential investors understand these factor while determining value proposition of EES for different applications.
34
7/17/2009
18
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
Acknowledgements
Co‐authors & Colleagues Netra Thakur, Rick Mancini and Jim Harvilla
I would also like to thankDr. Jay Apt & Dr. Lester Lave (CMU)Dr. Peter Balash (NETL) Joseph Sayer & Mark Torpey (NYSERDA)Haresh Kamath & Robert Schainker (EPRI)
This analysis was supported in part byThis analysis was supported in part byCarnegie Mellon Electricity Industry Center (CEIC)New York State Energy Research Administration (NYSERDA)National Energy Technology Labs (NETL)
35
Analyze.Simplify.Implement.
QUESTIONS ???QUESTIONS ???Dr. Rahul WalawalkarDr. Rahul Walawalkar
215215‐‐875875‐‐94409440rahul@cesrahul@ces‐‐ltd.comltd.comwww.ceswww.ces‐‐ltd.com ltd.com
Customized Energy Solutions Ltd.1528 Walnut Street, 22nd FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103 USA
Phone: 215‐875‐9440Fax: 215‐875‐9490info@ces‐ltd.com